Symbiosis: A surprising tale of species cooperation - David Gonzales

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 24 лип 2024
  • View full lesson: ed.ted.com/lessons/symbiosis-a...
    Different species often depend on one another. David Gonzales describes the remarkable relationship of the Clark's nutcracker and the whitebark pine, to illustrate the interdependency known as symbiosis.
    Lesson by David Gonzales, animation by Sunni Brown.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 125

  • @zaxseline5849
    @zaxseline5849 4 роки тому +57

    Anyone else have a teacher who has a link to this and if we wanted to we couldnt go to school cuz the corona virus

  • @bonto42
    @bonto42 11 років тому +10

    It's interesting how the bird's intent to bury the seeds is simply for it's own benefit to retrieve later to eat. By accident, simply because it can't remember where it buried all the seeds (or it already has what it needs), more trees will grow.

  • @thepixelatedpug8952
    @thepixelatedpug8952 7 років тому +23

    Symbiosis is not always just the two depending on each other. You have only described mutualism, while ignoring parasitic and commensalism.

    • @reasull
      @reasull 4 роки тому +3

      He’s talking about symbiotic mutualism

  • @rika4keio2worldpeace
    @rika4keio2worldpeace 2 роки тому +3

    How wonderful and educational-- there seem more than 40 different languages available for the captions!
    字幕選択にはウクライナ語も含めて40種もあるのですね。TED-ed ありがとうございます😊

  • @tetrammine
    @tetrammine 12 років тому +6

    I always get so giggly and happy whenever the TED Education intro song plays (:

    • @hannan5666
      @hannan5666 4 роки тому

      same it happened to me in class

  • @Syeal7
    @Syeal7 11 років тому +2

    Thanks for the refreshing of memory. Yeah you are right - remember that now from when I studied biology.

  • @darkdragonsoul99
    @darkdragonsoul99 11 років тому +16

    Symbiosis is so strange to me maybe it's because I'm a member of a species that can't even get along with it's self.

  • @suryasudharsan3815
    @suryasudharsan3815 7 місяців тому

    which term comes under symbiosis: two species helping each other intentionally or unintentionally or both

  • @FreeFromWar
    @FreeFromWar 12 років тому +14

    Two different species help each other, but we being one similar species, kill one another. The irony..

    • @penand_paper6661
      @penand_paper6661 6 років тому

      Not necessarily. Multitudes of species do that. Still tho...

    • @mirzasaifullah1509
      @mirzasaifullah1509 3 роки тому +1

      Hi ,,peace,,we,hve been finding u for years

  • @sirprize5191
    @sirprize5191 6 років тому +1

    I know it's old but humans are special as heck and if someone says "first thing I'd remove from earth is humans" then you should answer with "start with yourself" and cease interaction with this person if possible

  • @jiberish001
    @jiberish001 12 років тому

    If you did consider it, that's good, and I thank you for respecting the thought. I made it a point to let you know I was not taking a side, in the beginning, for a reason, that being so you would focus on the thought and not on my none existent position. But I fear you may have done just that. You indicate this first by playing semantics with a word I used, even though the definition I was using was clear from the context, so that you could argue with me despite me taking a side to be argued....

  • @lhrmeonom
    @lhrmeonom 12 років тому

    oh I get it now, thanks!!!! never thought of natural selection!!

  • @dclx5i
    @dclx5i 12 років тому +2

    It's strange for the tree to evolve the positioning of the pine cone to suit the bird. For it to make such a decision some sort of communication system has to exist - that too between the trees themselves. How else would a tree know that the seeds carried this particular bird have resulted in successful offspring? Geez, looks like trees are much more interactive than I thought :-/

  • @steezmonster92
    @steezmonster92 12 років тому

    @wrightmderek i was just about to state the same point.

  • @spliceosome
    @spliceosome 12 років тому

    more cool examples!!

  • @floydsteel1703
    @floydsteel1703 8 років тому +2

    Is it me or did he pronounce symbiosis two different ways?

    • @peyton8306
      @peyton8306 5 років тому +1

      yeah he did i literally just watched the whole video again to see

  • @jebc4652
    @jebc4652 5 років тому

    the symbiosis is incredible and maintains the natural balance.

  • @jessepigpiggg
    @jessepigpiggg 11 років тому

    where's the Chinese(traditional) sub? i've translated it for couple of days!

  • @godzilla964
    @godzilla964 Рік тому

    Could the relation between humans and dogs be a type of symbiosis?

    • @chourouk-gr9qg
      @chourouk-gr9qg 6 місяців тому

      No i don't think so
      We just live together

  • @luzalex
    @luzalex 5 років тому

    is very important in awar world thanks for video😍😍😍💕💕💕💖💖💖❤❤❤

  • @S0vereignX
    @S0vereignX 11 років тому +1

    just a thought here, is it possible to train birds like this to plant crop, i wouldn't expect perfect lines or nothing but just some kind of concentration of a crop. just thinking out loud, or i guess these days mean via my exo-mental implant gadget the internet, lol

  • @TommyFoo7
    @TommyFoo7 12 років тому

    Those bears are crazy! 0:58

  • @ToClose2Human
    @ToClose2Human 12 років тому

    We should try this sometime...

  • @yunxecxx
    @yunxecxx 2 роки тому +1

    공생체라는 단어를 잘 아시나요? 이 단어는 꿀벌과 꽃과 같은 두개의 다른 종 사이의 동반자적 관계를 칭하는 환상적인 뜻이에요. 공생체에서는 두 종 모두가 서로에게 의지합니다. 제가 작은 새의 한 종인 캐나다 산갈가마귀와 거대한 백송나무 사이의 놀라운 공생 관계에 대해 이야기 해볼까 합니다. 백송은 와이오밍주나 몬나타주 혹은 다른 주의 산악지대에서 자라죠. 이 나무에는 임관이라고 하는 커다란 가시덤불과 수 많은 가시가 있어요. 임관은 나무위를 덮어서 다른 동식물을 보호하기도 하죠. 그리고 백송나무는 숲을 먹여 살리기도 하죠. 백송의 방울에는 단백질이 꽉 차있거든요. 다람쥐는 방을을 위에서 부터 갉아 먹어서 방울이 땅에 떨어지도록 하죠. 그리고는 잽싸게 뛰어 내려와 덤불이나 가지 더미속에 방울을 숨겨요. 그래도 그 방울들을 모두 다 갖지는 못해요. 회색곰이나 검은 곰들이 덤불 속을 뒤지는 걸 좋아하거든요. 공생 관계에는 하나의 종이 다른 종을 먹여 살리는 것 이상의 것이 있답니다.ㅏ 갈가마귀의 경우에는 자신도 되갚아 주기도 한다는거죠. 씨를 모으면서 나무를 다시 심게 된다는 거죠. 이런겁니다. 자신의 강력한 부리를 사용하여 갈가마귀는 가지 끝에 달린 방울을 쪼아댑니다. 씨를 빼내는 거죠. 그리고는 최대한 80개 까지 그 씨를 목 안에 있는 주머니 속에 저장합니다. 그런 다음 숲을 날아다니며 씨를 숨길 장소를 물색하러 다녀요. 땅쏙 이점오미터 깊이에 여덟개까지 씨를 감추죠. 갈가마귀는 한 해에 씨를 구만개까지 모아두고는 그걸 다시 찾으로 겨울과 봄에 되돌아오죠. 이 새들은 영리해요. 이 녀석들은 그 씨를 어디에 숨겼는지 모두 기억하니까요. 이 녀석들은 주변에 표시를 해두기도 합니다. 나무나 가지 동강, 바위에도 하죠. 쌓인 눈 아래 깊숙히 감춰둔 씨를 삼각형 표시합니다. 이녀석들이 찾아내지 않은 씨들이 다시 백송 나무로 자라게 됩니다. 이런 공생 관계는 두 종에게 모두 매우 중요해서 서로에 맞춰 변화를 거듭하기도 하고 진화하기도 합니다. 갈가마귀는 방울 속의 씨를 꺼내기 위해 길고 단단한 부리를 가지게 되었고 백송나ㅜ의 가지는 방울을 끝에 달고 모두 위쪽으로 향해 있어서 근처를 날아다니는 갈가마귀에게 씨를 내줍니다. 이런 공생관계예요. 두 종이 서로를 위해서 서로에게 도움을 주며 협력하며 사는거죠.

  • @dylansweeney1433
    @dylansweeney1433 7 років тому +1

    is this true

  • @aic53
    @aic53 11 років тому

    A very beautiful tale.

  • @crazyasianskills
    @crazyasianskills 12 років тому +1

    Haha they reuploaded this to fix a typo in the animation.

  • @jiberish001
    @jiberish001 12 років тому

    I don't wish to take a side on this, but here's a thought for you.
    Those seeds the birds eat, are technically baby trees. It doesn't serve a seed to be eaten. :]

  • @GHhurrduurr
    @GHhurrduurr 12 років тому

    Only if the dogs support the human in a physical (and sometimes mental relationship, not love, so don't even try.) The human for example in hunting fowl will shoot the bird, then the dog will go and fetch it, (creation of the golden retriever.) The human then takes care of the dog, as long as the dog fetches the food for the human. This then creates a respectable relationship between the two creature, usually resulting in the formation of a fucking chihuahua or some other type of rat.

  • @Arausita
    @Arausita 12 років тому +1

    The bears look high!

  • @Holygiant
    @Holygiant 12 років тому

    Animation reminds me immensely of Monty Python.

  • @jiberish001
    @jiberish001 12 років тому

    You indicated your focus a second time by drawing attention again to my none existent position by implying that there was some hidden reason that I brought the issue up, and questioning why I "involved" myself in such a way, while stating that it was "having nothing to do with the point i was making", which isn't true, neither did it need to be. It is as if you want to me to have argument so that you can defend your position, and you'll even give me one if need be.

  • @Kurrrk91
    @Kurrrk91 12 років тому

    When we see it happen it will (wich we already did) then it will still be a theory. i think your confusing hypothesis with theory here.

  • @tepa19510
    @tepa19510 12 років тому +7

    why cant humans be like that...

    • @JoseELeon
      @JoseELeon 6 років тому

      because they are d--ks

    • @penand_paper6661
      @penand_paper6661 6 років тому

      Actually, we do have an important part in the world. We burn down select areas of forest to replenish the soil and spread conifer seeds, of which their cones burst with high heat. Please look up "Controlled forest fires", friend.

    • @billpage5900
      @billpage5900 6 років тому

      Dogs and humans are symbiotic

  • @user-fb9ss4op6n
    @user-fb9ss4op6n Рік тому +1

    Symbiosis is the most difficult niche of evolution.Симбиоз - самая трудная ниша эволюции.

  • @7689Lucy
    @7689Lucy 12 років тому +1

    I like the comments on these. They're usually smart sometimes.

    • @tutterthemouse152
      @tutterthemouse152 4 роки тому +1

      i like how i saw these comments and when i scrolled down i saw someone say: the bears look high! pretty smart yeah.

  • @Snaut1
    @Snaut1 12 років тому

    And other planets (If we advance that far). :)

  • @lhrmeonom
    @lhrmeonom 12 років тому

    But how does the tree evolve to grow pines at the end of the branch?

  • @shofianhadi4946
    @shofianhadi4946 3 роки тому

    Sure

  • @stalkingcat123
    @stalkingcat123 12 років тому

    And?

  • @Iamvillainous
    @Iamvillainous 12 років тому

    Oh you found it did yah?

  • @TurboBronco239
    @TurboBronco239 12 років тому

    !awesome!

  • @WhistlePigZILLA
    @WhistlePigZILLA 12 років тому

    That's only mutualism. A symbiosis in which both species benefit. What of commentialism and parasitism? Commentialism is a symbiosis in which one species benefits, but the other is unharmed such as a remora on a shark. The remora gets a ride and food scraps from the shark but the shark is unharmed. Parasitism is a symbiosis in which one species benefits at the expense of the other species, or the "host," if you will. A common example of this would be a deer tick on a dog.

  • @stalkingcat123
    @stalkingcat123 12 років тому

    hemp and humans

  • @stalkingcat123
    @stalkingcat123 12 років тому

    ???

  • @wrightmderek
    @wrightmderek 12 років тому

    symbioses dont have to be beneficial to all though..... he should have stated that it is a mutalistic symbiosis... as opposed to paracitic and commensal ones.

  • @alli6828
    @alli6828 3 роки тому

    yo what are the answers

  • @cdzn5781
    @cdzn5781 3 роки тому +2

    online school brought me here

  • @kulwindersingh-mf9cz
    @kulwindersingh-mf9cz 4 роки тому

    burb it is. soooooo digesting

  • @TenDividedBySix
    @TenDividedBySix 12 років тому

    ....There's an irony there somewhere.

  • @chunk032
    @chunk032 12 років тому

    More proof or intelligent design yay

  • @beb0126
    @beb0126 11 років тому

    this video was cool, but it only showed the mutualism side of symbiosis. Symbiosis is not exclusively mutually benefiting both species. Communalism and parasitism are also types of symbiosis. In reality, symbiosis doesn't mean "two different species who help eachother" It really is just a relationship between two different species in which at least one species is benefited.

  • @azulmoreno4787
    @azulmoreno4787 4 роки тому

    Venom is a symbiote. See movies are educa4tional and fun. School should be tuaght by movies

  • @jiberish001
    @jiberish001 12 років тому

    Typical UA-camr : Don't like the opinion of the other? Misconstrue or completely reverse what they say, attack their grammar, and then accuse them of being a troll. I was hoping that you might see the errors in your hasty argument against a point not made, and the attitude you had taken from an implied inaccurate first impression. So I guess I failed at that.
    "and honestly if you can tell that someone is intellegent from a few flamey comments on a video, thats pretty impressive" -VeilxILLia

  • @jiberish001
    @jiberish001 12 років тому

    That's just grasping at straws. Of curse there are exceptions, but you know I was talking about those seed that really do get eaten, and not just pass through a digestive system. You could have actually given it some thought, instead of just playing semantics with the word "eaten".

  • @LondonWalkability
    @LondonWalkability 11 років тому

    Don't you mean [almost] all living organisms? Everything respires with the use of Oxygen :)
    Unless you're an obligate anaerobe!

  • @murshidanajnin3694
    @murshidanajnin3694 3 роки тому

    Awwwwwww

  • @Leftistattheparty
    @Leftistattheparty 12 років тому

    Those seeds are like crack.

  • @A7KeLT
    @A7KeLT 12 років тому

    SPORE

  • @InsiyaAbbas-kl6cm
    @InsiyaAbbas-kl6cm 18 днів тому

    👏🏻👍🏻

  • @Voingous
    @Voingous 12 років тому

    It is evolution though.

  • @d26neil
    @d26neil 12 років тому

    Bravo! ;_;

  • @jesusstudentbrett
    @jesusstudentbrett 7 років тому

    Great presentation but it would be nice to leave the subtle conjectures implied as if observable, and therefore certain, out of the presentation. You said the nutcracker "developed" long hard beaks when the fact that is observable is they HAVE long hard beaks. Whether they developed over time is speculation albeit maybe yes or maybe no... but don't mislead ...just present what is certain. Be sure to point out what is theory versus observation. Young minds have not yet learned to distinguish between speculation and investigation of facts.

  • @jessepigpiggg
    @jessepigpiggg 11 років тому

    Why are the translators' names not on the video? It's not showing respect to the translators.

  • @TheZachary86
    @TheZachary86 12 років тому

    dogs and humans?

  • @hensonpedroleon7787
    @hensonpedroleon7787 7 місяців тому +1

    God did!

  • @GlennPaulWills
    @GlennPaulWills 12 років тому

    Bloody shame that the White Bark Pine is going to be extinct in 50 years. I hope the Clark's nutcracker is able to eat other gymnosperm seeds.

  • @mkwarlock
    @mkwarlock 11 років тому

    Game theory :)

  • @alial-ali865
    @alial-ali865 3 роки тому

    BIOL

  • @VeradoonKing
    @VeradoonKing 12 років тому

    LOLL

  • @Linkfandylontillo
    @Linkfandylontillo 12 років тому

    LOLOLOL

  • @chourouk-gr9qg
    @chourouk-gr9qg 6 місяців тому

    Well, god doesn't play with dice 🎲

  • @VeradoonKing
    @VeradoonKing 12 років тому

    gg

  • @Xziro3
    @Xziro3 12 років тому

    did you really not understand that or are you joking? Weed help ppl get high and people help plant weed...

  • @Linkfandylontillo
    @Linkfandylontillo 12 років тому

    Weed and people, lol.

  • @andrewcarnegie4565
    @andrewcarnegie4565 4 роки тому +1

    Human activities are killing all these beautiful life forms.

  • @Iamvillainous
    @Iamvillainous 12 років тому

    no shit

  • @shampoodaking
    @shampoodaking 12 років тому

    why cant god and evolution be real?not that i am a a believer