Everyone is forgetting that no war is won without boots on the ground. autonomous devices are simply support weapons. Support weapons need support and that is boots on the ground.
Boots on the ground are nothing more than targets for the enemy! What's needed today is what you are seeing, along with tactical backup, staying ahead of our enemies has to be a priority when faced with the extreme sized forces I hope we never have to face! Consider these weapon systems disposable! Wars can no longer be won by brute force alone but will be won by ingenuity and science! U.S. Army Sgt. Bill Fitzpatrick 67th MP Co. 1970-72
@@billfitzpatrick6202 I appreciate your experience as a buck sergeant military policeman from the Vietnam Era. But I'll defer to an infantryman who fought on the ground in three wars. "You can kill 'em all. You can destroy everything they have. But no battle is won until a 19-year-old with a rifle stands on a hill unopposed."
@@TomSwift-wy1gx No battle is one if the other side has air superiority. Once that is established, drones on the ground can finish the job without boots. Just becasue drones don't wear boots doesn't mean they cannot do an even better job.
Well good comments all. No system is perfect and can be destroyed, but, I can see many uses for the Ripsaw and it can save lives by being unmanned. I like how it has its own drone helicopter and ground crawler. Perhaps an anti-drone weapons system can be developed as an add on package. Creativity and imagination are key. Very fine start.
The ripsaw was first seen in the GI-Joe Movie with the Rock. He drove it. It's a Cheaper than a tank or training of a soldier. Drones and FPV's have Changed the battle field like how tanks did 100 years ago. Must Keep Up!
If you look at the old hasbro toys from the 80’s and 90’s, the two brothers must have gotten some inspiration, which led to what you reminded us of here. Pretty cool, actually.
Hollywood and US military at work. Here reality: the KF51 Panther"best tank according to experts" is now a joint-venture from Leonardo/Rheinmetall 50/50%, HQ is Rome, 60% will be build in Italy and 40% in Germany. Italy ordered 230 KF51 and 800 Lynx. Beside that from Auto-loader to the top notch electronic devices, they are provided by Leonardo, the loader is similar to that of the Centauro, Auto and Hand,of course big difference in size and stabilizers, the great engineering of the tank and cannon is provided by Rheinmetall. Leonardo provide also the Hitfact for the US Stryker DRS, and Greece will upgrade their Leo1A5 with Leonardo Hitfact turret
@@andyknolls8735 Vehicles can have shielded electronics so EMP's aren't always effective. Humvee's are also shielded. Abram Tanks can be operated without electronics. US military has learned from the innovation in technology.
My first thought is whether the Ripsaw can mount the Skyranger 30 or 35mm AAA turret. A good and mobile anti-drone and anti-helicopter 'Flakpanzer Junior' would certainly be welcome, especially if it can be remotely operated ir work semi-autonomous.
@@dadejazzba402 They could but the Ukrainians tried it against Russia with tanks and infantry véhicules, it did not turn in their favor. The Ripsaw is a nice "tank" but it would need to be built to military standards to to stand a chance in an actual real war with planes, tanks and other vehicles the enemy has.
@@micheltremblay4774When was this? I think the issue here is the video, not the real thing. The key to this is autonomous versions made at costs that allow them to be deployed in high numbers and in mined environments.
As long as the Army doesn't think it has an autonomous fighting vehicle, this thing should prove useful. Used as a remotely operated vehicle, it would be able to perform a variety of tasks without putting a crew in danger.
I defer to negative comments, by this simple idea; Use it Wisely! It has abilities not seen since the Hellcat Tank-Destroyer. It's almost 'Quiet' and could get much more silent. It has a Low Thermal Image, as well. And, lastly, It's a LOT QUICKER than most other craft out-there. The Studebaker 'Weasel' was a Recon Favorite in WW-2, because, it was amphibious, quiet, quick and Nimble, and 101st AB used it to great advantage, even-though, it was usually Un-Armed! Give it GUNS, and, the Battle-of-the-Bulge wouldn't have been.... This Is, that; and in a Modern war-front, it DOES NOT ALWAYS need a Human on-board. Not a Game-changer it was a decade ago, but, it'll add to Flexible Response.
Sounds like a new type of war equipment. Unmanned Tracked Vehicle (UTV). Extremely cool. Many are suggesting that drone warfare is the future, and I would not disagree. Anything that saves lives is good in my book. I think I would want some of these in my group. Now we have drones that have their own drones.
Any tanks in Ukraine. You have to understand NATO weapons are much different than what Ukraine has. The intelligence apparatus that NATO hardware is plugged into has the capability of taking out drones by the dozens. Hundreds even.
@@lance3540 when America builds weapons, it doesn't plan its weapons against China or Russia. It builds them against itself. Neither Russia or China have the capability of keeping up or being any threat to nato weaponry. America already has a way to defeat drones. With more coming online everyday. We're dicking around with lasers and anti-missile stuff. Wow. Ukraine and Russia are taping together. Homemade drones. None of what you see in Ukraine would work against NATO... You don't spend as much on the military as everybody else on the planet and not have an advantage on the battlefield....
Interesting and thanks, how much a copy? Any tank is subject to serious, possibly disabling, counter fire. So how much? The latest and greatest version of Arnold?
@@williamlloyd3769 The films production team bought an existing early model Ripsaw from Howe and Howe. They had a lot of trouble with it, and were frustrated. But, honestly, I never heard what caused the issues. Possibly it was the early prototype, and not fully developed, possibly it was hard to modify into the Gigahorse prop vehicle, possibly a Us vs Metric issue, or all 3 plus shit I never thought of. But it does indicate there may be weaknesses in the design.
Maybe it should have 5 attack drones that follow it,cuz that thing is fast,wth drones protecting it ,it would be effective but it would need it,with eyes on inside seeing whats out there ,if it was a robot thst would save on personnel!
I have seen cleetus McFarland break one i personally don't think there's anything cleetus can't break i hope that boy never gets ahold of a m1 god only knows what he could destroy
This effort would be a great help in the Ukraine where the ground conditions change dramatically. The speed and weight getting the vehicle over mine fields without damage. A wheeled mud version would do great too. Seasonal restrictions are a reality in the Ukraine.
Ukraine has shown that remote control and programmed drones and weapons can be hacked, there is always a counter to any new weapon so anticipating such counters is essential.
But what impact will this have on the battlefield? Probably little or none, unless one of the big military industrial complex defense companies buys them out. They're not about to let a small company steal their pork.
Why should this tank change everything? What makes it a game changer? Nothing. It is just another weapon with advantages and disadvantages as compared to other weapons. Stop boring me with this hyperactive, lying hyperbole. Thank you.
Because it can do missions that are to dangerous and it can get to enemy positions whit out being noticed and it can be used to send ahead of infantry so that no live will be lost on missions
Unfortunately, an autonomous, or even a remotely driven tank will never be able to refuel/resupply itself, perform field maintenance or wash its optics.
Yep it did change everything, especially when they got blown up by the cheap drones even before reaching the battle field as the world witnessed in Ukraine. The Ukrainians were told not to use them by the Americans.
@@sirdenisde4 nah. Too expensive and another easy prey to drones. It doesn’t have anything too game changing. There is no point for it to be unmanned if it still does need infantry support,a ne what if it breaks and no one can repair it on the field
This tank is good for Hollywood movies But Can't withstand the contested battlefield scenarios No armour no protection no safety measures Even heavy tanks r struggling to survive in the current contested battlefield scenarios Loitering drones will kill it easily at current battlefield scenarios
Watch Ukraine planes destroy tanks. The aircraft is equipped with visuals that remove the picture's noise, making the targets extremely easy to spot. In fact, it makes them look like shooting fish in a clear glass fishbowl. The pilot can see everything. The men on the ground cannot hide, and the vehicles cannot evade the pilot's visuals, leaving them nowhere to hide. There is no safe tank!
@@stefanschleps8758nah. Drones are almost impossible to counter right now. They are impossible to shotdown if they are FPV ones. Some drones use AI so it’s impossible to use ECM on them.
These brothers had very short lived tv program. They were entertaining to watch.
i remember watching that was pretty good show, shame it wasn't renewed, enjoy engineering programs like that, Howe and Howe they used to be called
They should make a 105mm towed field artillery version with an autoloader. That would be the ultimate shoot 'n scoot.
Everyone is forgetting that no war is won without boots on the ground. autonomous devices are simply support weapons. Support weapons need support and that is boots on the ground.
Boots on the ground are nothing more than targets for the enemy! What's needed today is what you are seeing, along with tactical backup, staying ahead of our enemies has to be a priority when faced with the extreme sized forces I hope we never have to face! Consider these weapon systems disposable! Wars can no longer be won by brute force alone but will be won by ingenuity and science! U.S. Army Sgt. Bill Fitzpatrick 67th MP Co. 1970-72
@@billfitzpatrick6202 I appreciate your experience as a buck sergeant military policeman from the Vietnam Era. But I'll defer to an infantryman who fought on the ground in three wars. "You can kill 'em all. You can destroy everything they have. But no battle is won until a 19-year-old with a rifle stands on a hill unopposed."
@@billfitzpatrick6202It has no brains still. It can't do a mission without someone controlling it.
@@TomSwift-wy1gx No battle is one if the other side has air superiority. Once that is established, drones on the ground can finish the job without boots. Just becasue drones don't wear boots doesn't mean they cannot do an even better job.
BUT WAIT - there's more!!! So you don't forget order before midnight tonight. Free set of Ginsu Knives!
How much would you pay now? But wait there’s more! 😂
🤣🤣🤣
BUT WAIT - there's more. If you order 9 Ripsaws in the next 20 minutes, the tenth one is FREE!!!!!
They can be ordered off Temu!
🤣
Well good comments all. No system is perfect and can be destroyed, but, I can see many uses for the Ripsaw and it can save lives by being unmanned. I like how it has its own drone helicopter and ground crawler. Perhaps an anti-drone weapons system can be developed as an add on package. Creativity and imagination are key. Very fine start.
Funny, the track sponsons on the Ripsaw look very similar to those found on the WWII M4 Sherman tank.
I’m glad to see such a vehicle that will save lives
The ripsaw was first seen in the GI-Joe Movie with the Rock. He drove it. It's a Cheaper than a tank or training of a soldier. Drones and FPV's have Changed the battle field like how tanks did 100 years ago. Must Keep Up!
yes, drones are nice, until they get hit with electronic warfare, then they become useless expensive pieces of jumnk.
If you look at the old hasbro toys from the 80’s and 90’s, the two brothers must have gotten some inspiration, which led to what you reminded us of here. Pretty cool, actually.
I recognize the Ripsaw from the show where I saw them developing it.
Major league cool!
Hollywood and US military at work. Here reality: the KF51 Panther"best tank according to experts" is now a joint-venture from Leonardo/Rheinmetall 50/50%, HQ is Rome, 60% will be build in Italy and 40% in Germany. Italy ordered 230 KF51 and 800 Lynx. Beside that from Auto-loader to the top notch electronic devices, they are provided by Leonardo, the loader is similar to that of the Centauro, Auto and Hand,of course big difference in size and stabilizers, the great engineering of the tank and cannon is provided by Rheinmetall. Leonardo provide also the Hitfact for the US Stryker DRS, and Greece will upgrade their Leo1A5 with Leonardo Hitfact turret
@@andyknolls8735
Vehicles can have shielded electronics so EMP's aren't always effective. Humvee's are also shielded.
Abram Tanks can be operated without electronics.
US military has learned from the innovation in technology.
Tank no IFV, the turret says it all. Also love the Sherman like suspension.
It would be a great off road buggy. Really cute.
Thanks. ✌🏻👊🏼
My first thought is whether the Ripsaw can mount the Skyranger 30 or 35mm AAA turret. A good and mobile anti-drone and anti-helicopter 'Flakpanzer Junior' would certainly be welcome, especially if it can be remotely operated ir work semi-autonomous.
You can literally put anything on it. The 30mm chain gun is the current proposal
It would not survive a 50 caliber rifle or machine gun. It's an oversize snow mobile.
It could be used in a swarm
It can suvive both depending on where its hit and the guys operating those guns defenitly wont survive the rip saws gun
@@dadejazzba402 They could but the Ukrainians tried it against Russia with tanks and infantry véhicules, it did not turn in their favor.
The Ripsaw is a nice "tank" but it would need to be built to military standards to to stand a chance in an actual real war with planes, tanks and other vehicles the enemy has.
@@micheltremblay4774When was this?
I think the issue here is the video, not the real thing. The key to this is autonomous versions made at costs that allow them to be deployed in high numbers and in mined environments.
è un costosissimo giocattolo per fare soldi, le armi per vincere la guerra sono un'altra cosa
Ripsaw is a very valuable autonomous vehicle fit for different usage by fire department,swat,and police departments in various
States.
As long as the Army doesn't think it has an autonomous fighting vehicle, this thing should prove useful. Used as a remotely operated vehicle, it would be able to perform a variety of tasks without putting a crew in danger.
That suspension looks vulnerable.
very and 60mph, I think that was on the stripped down version. But he, it was in the fast and furious so it must be good right.
It's just a cheap quick platform to mount more guns on.
Seems like wasted money to me.
@@samipso But it was in the fast and furious!!!!
The mechanics on MadMax Fury Road had no end of trouble with theirs. Called it an absolute piece of shit.
With all the autonomous vehicles, drones, etc., how will they survive in a heavy EMP environment?
I defer to negative comments, by this simple idea; Use it Wisely! It has abilities not seen since the Hellcat Tank-Destroyer. It's almost 'Quiet' and could get much more silent. It has a Low Thermal Image, as well. And, lastly, It's a LOT QUICKER than most other craft out-there. The Studebaker 'Weasel' was a Recon Favorite in WW-2, because, it was amphibious, quiet, quick and Nimble, and 101st AB used it to great advantage, even-though, it was usually Un-Armed! Give it GUNS, and, the Battle-of-the-Bulge wouldn't have been.... This Is, that; and in a Modern war-front, it DOES NOT ALWAYS need a Human on-board. Not a Game-changer it was a decade ago, but, it'll add to Flexible Response.
è un costosissimo e inutile giocattolo per impressionare i paesi disarmati. Le armi che fanno vincere le guerre sono ben altra cosa.
@@Maurizio4672 unarmed countries or their countries civilian population. That what this looks like to me.
Sounds like a new type of war equipment. Unmanned Tracked Vehicle (UTV). Extremely cool. Many are suggesting that drone warfare is the future, and I would not disagree. Anything that saves lives is good in my book. I think I would want some of these in my group. Now we have drones that have their own drones.
Hasn't the war in Ukraine just proved a hundred dollar drone can destroy any tank?
Air counters tanks and tanks counter infantry
Any tanks in Ukraine. You have to understand NATO weapons are much different than what Ukraine has. The intelligence apparatus that NATO hardware is plugged into has the capability of taking out drones by the dozens. Hundreds even.
And do you not think that equipment won't adapt
@@lance3540 when America builds weapons, it doesn't plan its weapons against China or Russia. It builds them against itself. Neither Russia or China have the capability of keeping up or being any threat to nato weaponry. America already has a way to defeat drones. With more coming online everyday. We're dicking around with lasers and anti-missile stuff. Wow. Ukraine and Russia are taping together. Homemade drones. None of what you see in Ukraine would work against NATO... You don't spend as much on the military as everybody else on the planet and not have an advantage on the battlefield....
Australia has developed a system to take on drones that can be mounted different vehicles
Id there s remote controlled model om the drawing board?
Sounds like stuff out of GI Joe cartoons from the 80's and 90's brought to life.
We need an effective anti drone drone.
Something that flies faster than current drones and has the weapons to shoot down enemy drones.
Put the main gun, counter weight support equipment, fire control and ammo on this and it won't be scooting for long.
Interesting and thanks, how much a copy? Any tank is subject to serious, possibly disabling, counter fire. So how much? The latest and greatest version of Arnold?
Interesting , Thank You . I hope it works
Yeah still the drones will get it
Thought the Ripsaw was derived from a Mad Max bullet town vehicle.
@@williamlloyd3769 The films production team bought an existing early model Ripsaw from Howe and Howe. They had a lot of trouble with it, and were frustrated. But, honestly, I never heard what caused the issues. Possibly it was the early prototype, and not fully developed, possibly it was hard to modify into the Gigahorse prop vehicle, possibly a Us vs Metric issue, or all 3 plus shit I never thought of. But it does indicate there may be weaknesses in the design.
Awesome machine
i remember watching this on discovery years ago
This actually doesn't surprise me...the M-16 was modeled after a TYCO toy by ArmaLite.
Maybe it should have 5 attack drones that follow it,cuz that thing is fast,wth drones protecting it ,it would be effective but it would need it,with eyes on inside seeing whats out there ,if it was a robot thst would save on personnel!
Drones don’t care if it fast, FPV drones can go like 120 km/h and one and it’s destroyed
Reminds me of Soundwave from the transformers who would lauch all type of little drones.
I have seen cleetus McFarland break one i personally don't think there's anything cleetus can't break i hope that boy never gets ahold of a m1 god only knows what he could destroy
I saw the picture and knew right away.. Howe and Howe tech. from tv... Save America.
How is the jamming of GPS and electronic interference going to be delt with to prevent the Ripsaw becoming a useless bot?
more lives would be saved if the US provided Healthcare to its people.
Or education.
In the meantime the Ruskies are moving towards the same vehicles used by the Jawa in the first Star Wars movie
This effort would be a great help in the Ukraine where the ground conditions change dramatically. The speed and weight getting the vehicle over mine fields without damage. A wheeled mud version would do great too. Seasonal restrictions are a reality in the Ukraine.
ideal for forward aggressive SF FOB, Ranger. Marines
Not sure ground based ROVs will ever have the viability that air and even water based ROVs will have😊
Ha, the dude that built the OG lives in my state… backyard genius.
That's cool.
That suspension looks like high maintenance
How
Ripsaw was actually used first onscreen in GIJOE 2 Retalliation
Expensive Paperweight, 1 💲500 Drone 💥🔥 Cause and Effect
Will be awesome for the Airborne
I never see sensors for hidden buried mines that can be seen immediately.
What? They powered it with a Chebby engine? Otherwise, it's cool. I also love the MILREM Themis platform.
strip it down ,change it into and evac vic, for wounded and supply while in trinch warfair. Electrify for no IR signa,
ture!
every new tank changes everything... for some days...
Ukraine has shown that remote control and programmed drones and weapons can be hacked, there is always a counter to any new weapon so anticipating such counters is essential.
I knew it! it's a different platform, I know there a purpose they could apply with this quick track
At best it could have a SWAT application.
Do they have fat tracks for deep mud. It might get the nickname " the bug".
Worst case scenario. These are deployed against American civilians piloted by kids who think they are playing War Thunder.
But what impact will this have on the battlefield? Probably little or none, unless one of the big military industrial complex defense companies buys them out. They're not about to let a small company steal their pork.
Obviously, the US Army has never watched the Terminator series
Is there anyway to block all the darn harris mooch adds?
How vulnerable is it to drone attack?
Why should this tank change everything? What makes it a game changer? Nothing. It is just another weapon with advantages and disadvantages as compared to other weapons. Stop boring me with this hyperactive, lying hyperbole. Thank you.
Because the title brings views.
Because it can do missions that are to dangerous and it can get to enemy positions whit out being noticed and it can be used to send ahead of infantry so that no live will be lost on missions
Nothing in the video was a lie
@@marijnnn4992 I agree that it can save soldiers lives by doing things instead of soldiers, but it doesn't do anything really new or better.
It’s modular and potentially autonomous.
Just make it a little bigger and put a 75 mm main gun instead of a 20mm and even a 105 mm main gun
It will NEVER replace the M-1... It's about only good for Recon... PERIOD!!!
Is this a trade show video? Am I going to get home, take this out of the box, and be disappointed?
Unfortunately, an autonomous, or even a remotely driven tank will never be able to refuel/resupply itself, perform field maintenance or wash its optics.
the over used phrase. this changes everything lets see you hear that 40 times a day right and nothing changes
The better the tank the harsher the missile
Yep it did change everything, especially when they got blown up by the cheap drones even before reaching the battle field as the world witnessed in Ukraine. The Ukrainians were told not to use them by the Americans.
It's a WWII Locust tank... modernized. They look exactly alike.
It doesn’t look like a weapon to surpass Metal Gear.
this will definitely be a game changer
Yea it wont
@@Lwaww it will
@@sirdenisde4 nah. Too expensive and another easy prey to drones. It doesn’t have anything too game changing. There is no point for it to be unmanned if it still does need infantry support,a ne what if it breaks and no one can repair it on the field
Will*@@Lwaww
@@Lwawwits not an easy pray to drones drones wil be an easy pray to it
Yeah these have been around for a while for civilians though
It's a big target for a drone or a mine. Unless it has a force field and phasers, it's still just a steel coffin.
It’s autonomous so no body on board.
make tanks 1meter thick armour with 155mm cannon main and 35mm auto cannon front and back, 3x7.62mm mg with 3000hp engine
Reminds me of the old M22.
But will it deliver my pizza in under 30 minutes??
Si, diciamo che gli USA in quanto a costruzione di costosi giocattoli stanno dando il massimo, ma le armi sono un'altra cosa.
Yeah your gonna need a bigger main gun from what I see it's underpowered in the weapons category
😮😮😮
Hi @sumansingha4882, thanks for your comment. We hope you enjoyed the video 😎
Now have it able to carry and launch small remote boats with little torpedoes and explosive packages.
This tank is good for Hollywood movies
But
Can't withstand the contested battlefield scenarios
No armour no protection no safety measures
Even heavy tanks r struggling to survive in the current contested battlefield scenarios
Loitering drones will kill it easily at current battlefield scenarios
Did the brothers sell the ripsaw rights?
By glass of Port hasn't changed...
in the modern world all war equipments are remote control.
Cyberdyne core situation system..
I'm gonna be the 1st kid on my block to order and own my very own Ripsaw!!! 😃
I forsee many friendly fire incidents.
Drone finished in five minutes
😮 2:03
Drones can be jammed by a modern army ...
Haven't any of you seen terminator???
Watch Ukraine planes destroy tanks. The aircraft is equipped with visuals that remove the picture's noise, making the targets extremely easy to spot. In fact, it makes them look like shooting fish in a clear glass fishbowl. The pilot can see everything. The men on the ground cannot hide, and the vehicles cannot evade the pilot's visuals, leaving them nowhere to hide. There is no safe tank!
SiFi stuff of yesterday meats corporate profit-making in 2014 and that is how it will fail. Yes, make it to speck as defined by the lowest bidder...
The Terminator is coming....
Ps - its too big , should have a Javelin Missile mounted- could be made much smaller - and electric - its too noisy doh
It looks pretty but can it fight? 😂
But wait there's more...
I played with a smaller toy one if these 20 years ago- its not Rocket Science
It’s worthless now that drones are around
Nope. ECM is adapting to that. By this time next year most drones will be obsolete. 😢
@@stefanschleps8758nah. Drones are almost impossible to counter right now. They are impossible to shotdown if they are FPV ones. Some drones use AI so it’s impossible to use ECM on them.
Kt can easly shoot down the drones and the drones are ganna have a hard time finding it
@@Lwawwmost fpv drones dont use ai so they can be jammer whit eas and it can Just shoot them down
@@marijnnn4992 from how it looks it looks expensive. It would useful if it would cost around 2-4 millions max and produced in high numbers