The Coming Ambiguity Anarchy w/ Dr. Ralph Martin
Вставка
- Опубліковано 12 чер 2024
- 📺 Full Episode: • The Synod, The State o...
Matt and Dr. Martin talk about how Pope Francis' Ambiguity is going to harm the laity. They also discuss why it is more important than ever that the laity stand up for orthodoxy and the Truth.
🟣 Join Us on Locals (before we get banned on YT): mattfradd.locals.com/
🖥️ Website: pintswithaquinas.com/
🟢 Rumble: rumble.com/c/pintswithaquinas
👕 Merch: shop.pintswithaquinas.com
🚫 FREE 21 Day Detox From Porn Course: www.strive21.com/
🔵 Facebook: / mattfradd
📸 Instagram: / mattfradd
We get a small kick back from affiliate links. - Розваги
"Even if Catholics faithful to Tradition are reduced to a handful, they are the ones who are the true Church of Jesus Christ.” - St. Athansius
Amongst his various letters and responses, Pope Francis has said "We can't bless sin", "Any sexual activity outside of marriage is a sin" and "Marriage is between a man and a woman". And yes, he then also clarified that we can't bless gay unions in a way that confuses them with marriage, which is true even if you want to claim its ambiguous. But clarity has been offered in other places, and it shouldn't be ignored.
At the same time, he passively tolerates the blessing of same-Sex unions by the German bishops while going after traditional Catholics…
@philkhz Fair enough, I agree the German Bishops should also be addressed. It's confusing why they aren't, but let's not cause more confusion by taking the Pope out of context or not reading statements in light of things he's already said and clarified. And then use that as further evidence to claim "I think the Pope is intending to be ambiguous and cause confusion."... when in actuality, Martin is the one causing the confusion, whether he intends to or not.
Yes but his occasional statements that support some degree of orthodoxy are in conflict with other public statements and behaviors. That ambiguity.
@steelmongoose4956 Atheists make the same claims about the Bible. That it's self-contradicting, confusing and ambiguous enough to split Christianity.
But our faith informs us that seemingly contradictory passages can be harmonized, and so we strive to do so.
Likewise, do we believe the papal magisterium can promote heresy or not? The traditional Catholic faith is that it can't, and if the Rad Trads strived to harmonize Pope Francis with traditional teachings, they could. The clarity has been offered. But instead, they pick and choose, then often use that as a reason to defend dissenting from the Pope or sedevecantist positions.
@@steelmongoose4956 It is clear that the Holy Father wants to uphold orthodoxy, while at the same time not being openly hostile to catholics who have fallen prey to the liberal cultural zeitgeist.
There are many people who pray the Rosary, go to Confession and receive the Eucharist, but innocently believe that it's charitable and compassionate to be in favor of same sex unions or abortion. Perhaps he is worried that they might leave the Church if she shows herself aggressively opposed to these issues.
He is clear on the topics. To anyone who knows where to look, his position is unambiguous: Pope Francis upholds the tradition. But these statements aren't as easy to find as I'd like. It's a matter of prudence which he has the right to exercise and we have the right to disagree on.
Confusion is from the devil.
Mr. Gómez Dávila is the same that once said:
“Swimming against the current is not idiotic if the waters are racing toward a waterfall.”
Pray for Clarity in the Church.
There is no ambiguity, the Dubia explicitly says that there can’t be rites neither sacraments done that could misguide someone to think that something can be equal or have similarities to marriage (A blessing is a rite). And it also says that marriage is between man and woman. It also says that people or groups of people can be blessed, but if your read the parts before, you would conclude that it doesn’t refer to couples, but individuals and groups of individuals (like people from Courage and so on). There is no ambiguity, people who don’t understand is because they don’t want to. Once the heart is hardened it is difficult to have charity and love.
German Bishops should be getting a correction any day now, then. 👍🏻
@@EpoRose1 I don’t understand why people can’t accept that something’s good and have to mix topics. There can be mistakes on other things, but when talking about just ambiguity and the Popes following of doctrine, it has nothing to do with Germany or other administrative things.
Amen
That isn’t the part that is ambiguous. No one is claiming that the Pope is equating a same sex union as a marriage. At least Martin isn’t claiming that in this snippet.
The ambiguity is the Pope leaving the door open for a priest to exercise his own discretion to give a form of blessing to a same sex union. Because in the Pope’s words, when a blessing is asked it’s a plea to God to “live better”. Which begs the question. Live better how? In accordance with God’s standard or man made standards that vary with the mores of the times?
From personal experience I can say that I don’t know of any gay or lesbian couple that sought a formal union who were seeking to live better in accordance with the Christian faith by abandoning their lifestyle. Rather the opposite. They wanted the world to know that they are committed to their same sex relationship.
@@maximillianwylde5163 only is they're celibate.
With all the backlash Ralph Martin (a moderate Charismatic btw) is getting, I totally understand why Matt hasn't interviewed a Fraternity priest. The comments would just be absolute bedlam
What fraternity?
@@Psyrus88 Priestly Fraternity of St. Peter
"Ambiguity is intentional" So true.
I think the ambiguity is intentional as well..........make a mess
This is another example of letting the World influence the church and distorting scripture in order to make people feel better.
🔴 if Pope Francis want it ... 😂👍
⚫ Bergoglio is the Master of Confusion ✅
The bass is really high, especially on the guest mic. This isn't new, it would be great to get that balance fixed.
Go to Reason and theology for that
Those that erode the gospel truths of the Holy Trinity with regard to sexual immorality and sexual confusion and work to dismantle objective truth whether they are laity, priests or bishops -- they do grave, grave harm to individuals, families, communities and nations and quite frankly objective truth that underpins science, morality, law and reason. As a person that lived in the world of LGBT for decades and who converted to Catholicism, if not for the clarity of the Catholic church on the subject of morality, the objective truth, and of the church teachings based in sound reason, I would never had the courage to set aside the disordered thinking of secular society and return to being a true follower of Christ in truth, purity of heart, mind and soul and take the hand of Jesus Christ once more. Church leaders that think we need to just get with it, evolve with the times and thus complying with sexual mores of a secular world that has disdain for God, are just at best emotional dupes of the Spirit of the Age or well, just evil. Truth matters. God bless the Bride of Christ.
Amen and amen!
My Jesus, mercy!
It seems the Synod is an endaround which is how Francis works. So glad the talk about the inevitable confusion and double messaging that is happening now
Clarity. We need Truth. Simple Clear Truth.
They only way your can sustain a battle with any kind of sexual disorder, wheather straight or gay is: Daily Mass, Monthy Confession, at least one hour of prayer everyday. I pray 3 hours everday. I say 15 decades of the rosary everday along with other devotions. I also read the bible everyday. I consectrated myself to the Blessed Mother, that really works believe it or not. I am straight but struggled with a particular sin for most of my life. The things I mentioned above is what saved me. I still have the temptation with this particular mortal sin, however with Gods grace it is very manageable. It cannot over power me like it did before. Its like St Augustine. He said his lust for women never completely left him but he was able to contain it through Gods grace. The thing that irritates me about this gay blessing is, It is going to help anybody, it will do just the opposite. The pope is supposed to be smart. He is a dummy on this one. Mis-guided compassion. And that is being gentle. I pray for him, but I dont like him. He is revolting to me. Also he is tempting priests to commit a grave sin by doing a blessing. Its insanity in the catholic church.
Thsnks very much WILBUR for your Testimony / WITNESS /Endurance by your co- operstion with CHRISTS GRACE. 🇦🇺
@@tonygarbellotto1926 God bless you, Never give up and try to become more and more holy and closer to God. If your heart is open to Him, He will help you.
I’m not sure why dr Martin left out the part where it also states that if the person is “willing and prepared”. That should cover his concerns about if they repent or are ready to live a life according to Gods will
That is so vague it could mean virtually anything.
@@willl676especially within the context of Catholicism!!1!
@@willl676 Martin also left out that it was stated they can receive baptism "under the same conditions as other believers." And what are the conditions for other believers? A willingness for repentance.
@@pjelpers Now that is better defined.
Not only that, but the very first paragraph in the document says that transsexual people can be baptized "under the same conditions as any other faithful", AND THAT MEANS REPENTANCE IS REQUIRED.
Weaponized ambiguity, remember Vigano’s words.
Loved listening to the interview. I should have stopped there as some of the comments were so extreme! People no longer listen openly and thoughtfully.
And yet here we are with the recently released "Fiducia Supplicans". I asked this elsewhere but how is a priest supposed to bless the very thing the church calls intrinsically immoral and contrary to the divine order?
God bless Bishop Strickland
Ralph Martin and Matt Fradd really did a great job anticipating the continuing ambiguity that is plaguing the RCC, but in a very respectful and charitable way. Both seem to have a good sense of where the RCC is and where it is currently heading.
An old game. Bad pols write regs loosely worded on purpose and then use "policy" to twist things the way they want.
Welp..
The Popesplainers have got some 'splainin to do.
Fernández’s full response to LifeSiteNews is as follows:
What the Church said is that the homosexual union is not blessed, because it [the Church] has the clear definition of marriage which is a union between a male and female open to new life.
Only that is called matrimony - marriage, only that reality is called that way.
So the blessing that could confuse and not make clear about this reality is not good for the Church.
But perhaps also [they] need blessings, not only one isolated person, but two persons who are asking for a blessing because they want to be faithful to God, they want to be better, they want to grow in their Christian life.
The blessing is not a sacrament. And we mustn’t ask the same conditions [for] a simple blessing that we ask for a sacrament.
Blessing is a sign of the “opera pastorale” [pastoral work], to every people in every situation, and we [need to] know nothing [about] the people with how is his Christian life, the morals and other things [in order] to give the blessing.
They visit a Priest & can individually seek prayer & this is highly desireous for there ETERNAL SALVATION.
THEY are not a union, so all this bergoglian ambiguity needs to be abhored & called out as DECEPTION.
I watched this video after the publication of Fiducia Supplicans. Dr Martin, unfortunately is prescient in his thoughts presented here.
However, one is forced to confront the question: Is the magisterium of Pope Francis more holy than all those preceding him, leading souls with more surety to Heaven?
Every Pontificate from now until the end of time will be controversial thanks to the 24/7 Catholic social media industrial-complex filled with endless hot-takes & commentary.
😂 you said it better than I could.
It goes both ways. We should practice digital hygiene and be aware of harmful influence and distortions created by the media technology and the way we interface with it…. BUT as LEADERS the Church should also be concerned with how these technologies disrupt the channels of communication. It’s not just mainstream media giving us “misinfo” about Church politics. There are active disinfo media people working for the church creating this parallel “media magisterium”. The Church has been hijacked in a similar way to how Vatican II was hijacked by Big Media and the picture they want to paint for the public.
It doesn't matter if the subject is controversial or not. What needs to be seen is whether the decision upholds Christ teachings or not.
Exactly people don't realise the effect of information overload.
Not really true. If the Pope and his helpers wanted to give clarity they sure would have the means to do it. It would be sufficient to:
1) be straightforward in his comments and declarations
2) stop the blatant use of double standard when they "fix" problems/situations/bishops or at least motivate the evident use of double standard
3) really motivate some very questionable and discriminatory choices
Out there, plenty of catholic podcaster/ youtube channel/ etc can't wait to have the means to defend the Pope. Most of them stopped to defend him simply because the Pope itself (and the Curia) never provided the necessary means.
The last example sounds like it would cause scandal and thus would not be allowed, per the document.
But not allowed by who? I go to a parish with openly gay couples wearing rings. What priest today will say no, I can't bless your union and then have the potential to face the media firestorm that causes? Meanwhile, Pope Francis ejects the most traditional bishops, like Bishop Strickland, and he does nothing about Father James Martin, so where will the Vatican be when a priest tries to avoid scandal? You can read the dubias with charity but also admit that it gives zero comfort to a priest who legitimately wants to avoid scandal.
@@lahair5751 the document is suggested guidance for practicing charity towards others who might have different values than you.
Is the meaning ambiguity kinda like being or having double standard?
I think something is unclear nowadays. A bad Pope is not someone who change the doctrine, because if we believe in the Church and in the Holy spirit we also believe that He will never allow a Pope to teach an heresy ex catedra. A bad Pope is a Pope who has a bad moral conduct and/or doesn't defend the doctrine of the Church and/or doesn't bring clarity on doctrinal matter when confusion and ambiguity arise. Sure, Pope Francis has never openly taught heresy and we can almost be certain of his personal orthodoxy as we are also pretty sure he is a good person. Nevertheless not only he didn't bring certainty in situation of ambiguity but he himself caused most of them, not to mention that he often had a discriminatory double standard when dealing with certain situations/groups. In conclusion (obviously in my opinion) for very (VERY!) different reasons I classify as "bad popes" both Alexander VI and Pope Francis and I think I can reasonably say this and still be a catholic. I really hope to change my mind before the end of this pontificate but I fear I won't.
#heisstillthePope #prayforPopeFrancis
I happen to be a gay guy who is asexual. IF I had a partner I would want him to be a asexual as well. Could we have a blessing to help us live a morally correct life? Perhaps a blessing on a gay union would help them be more aware of God's call to be chaste and follow His will.
Biblically, two men cannot become one. If you had a partner of the same sex, you would not show the fruits of a person putting his or her faith in Christ. If you are in Christ, you would no longer desire to be identified as gay.
Where in my comment did I say I would be one with my partner? And who are you that you have the right to say I am not putting my faith in Jesus? You don't even know me. I was at mass this morning and received communion. Do you even know what asexual means?@@mattb4249
If that's what you truly want... ask God for that grace.
God does not author confusion.
Can you have Michael Lofton on the show?
Yes, this needs to be cleared up, ie the errors in Dr Martins interview.🙏
Why, the guy is a joke and does nothing but lie. Follow good truthful people, he's a disgrace.
@boom-botz444 I hear the claim that he is biased quite a bit, but respectfully, I just don't see his bias. A big reason why I like him is because of his extensive use of direct sources and reading directly from papal documents. I hope this is coming across in a respectful way, because that is how I intend it.
@@boom-botz444Dave Gordon vs Tim Gordon on these issues would be fun
@@boom-botz444bad take.
Studied ambiguity
Christ wasn’t ambiguous.
Sometimes he was. "Why call me good, no one is good but God."
@@eabm1984 Good point. I was referring to His teachings on divorce, marriage, and gender.
@@pf4005 neither has Pope Francis been ambiguous on marriage, gender, or divorce. People need to stop listening to people who have an anti-Catholic agenda. The Pope has been clear, it's his critics who are muddying the waters.
@@eabm1984How is that ambiguous?
@@eabm1984That is a horrible way of thinking, there is a difference between criticism and hate. It's not wise to view every disagreement as a hateful attack, you will end up ignoring valid criticisms that could be beneficial.
Strange that Fernandez statement contradicts what Ralph Martin claims. Read below its there in the public forum. Ralph Martin has made an error.
maybe there should be clarity about how the religion actually started, and what the corruptions and error of thought were at the beginning, so ppl who dont deserve it wont have to suffer for it. gays suffered enough, time to look inside instead of outside.
Michael Lofton actually quoted a part in the dubia where it clearly implies repentance. That needs to be addressed. If you are saying your infallible pope is going to allow ambiguity for non-repentance, either your pope is not infallible and that means you have no business to being Catholic anymore, or you are misinterpreting the dubia with malice because you assume your infallible pope is heretical. Call a spade a spade. Either become Orthodox or defend your pope. This is silly.
No no no
You DON'T need the Pope to tell you it's a sin. Just read the Bible on Sodomy.
Exactly
I think rather than blessing them they should receive anointing of the sick.
Michael Lofton has recently attempted to “correct” both of you, Scott Hahn, Brian Holdsworth, and others talking about Pope Francis, Bishop Strickland and many others who aren’t in lockstep with the Vatican. I’d love to see him in an in person interview with several of you.
Michael Lofton is the most ridiculous papal boot-licker I’ve ever come across in my life. If Pope Francis said clearly, in English, that homosexuality is not a sin, Lofton would defend it and jump on people criticizing it.
He is the ONLY Catholic UA-camr being in any way responsible with these documents. This is outrageous.
@@catholickirbyYes, this is truly tragic. Pints with Aquinas used to be my favorite Catholic show, but that's changing. I'd love to see Matt and Lofton talk in person, but alas....
I'm finding that people would rather ignore Michael Lofton and say they don't like him, instead of actually engaging his arguments.
@@catholickirby what documents?
gotta love that these people still exist. "aur naur my magic book says you can’t do this"
BINGO, read Veritatis Splendor, its getting ignored and trampled on...
The long video was bad enough, but reposting these lies as a clip. I appreciate Matt's pushback, but still. Smh😔
No kidding, I'm losing respect for PwA.
Blessings for drunks and bank robbers is next week
Is alcoholism as sinful as robbing banks?
@@IONov990Jesus indicated that, by their nature, all sins are equal to God. In His Sermon on the Mount, the Lord mentioned two “big” sins-murder and adultery-and equated them with unjustified anger and lustful thoughts (Matthew 5:21-22, 27-28). Anger, murder, lust, and adultery are all sins, and we need to take them all seriously.
@@vladtheinhaler8940 I guess one seems more detrimental to human life than another 🌞
This an excellent video clip, and I couldn't agree more. No one including the pope himself can't change Catholic Doctrine, and teaching.
And he hasn't change anything! He said you can't bless the sin or the union but you can bless the person to lead a better life. Also Dr Martin missed the bit at the start where it says that for a Trans person to get baptised it needs to be under the same conditions as everyone else which is repentance.
@@davidproudlock7517 so much for avoiding the occasion of sin, now we are blessing it and making it permanent...
The ambiguity seems oddly selective. Pope Francis seems to be fairly unambiguous about what he sees as errors of the right, such as capital punishment. It's only errors of the left where the ambiguity is so prevalent.
It seems that you guys block me in my other channel. I'll be unsubcribing from this channel. I cannot support a channel that promotes slanders against the Pope.
The slander against the Pope is astounding.
The devotion to a fallible man as if he speaks for God is what's disturbing.
@@vladtheinhaler8940 I guess you would not have followed John the baptist or any of the prophets I guess.
First and foremost, a pope can't be a heretic, according to saint Bellarmine, and a private individual can't judge a pope regarding doctrinal error (according to pope Hadrian in the 8th ecumenical council). Michael Lofton (from Reason and Theology) has many videos regarding this topic demontrating just that. Furthemore, the response to the dubia was very clear that the homosexual union is not blessed, but the person requesting the blessing can. Cardinal Fernandez even said in an exclusive interview with LifeSite News (which they kept hidden for weeks and misrepresented), that the Church teaches that the homosexual union is not blessed, but the person, even if they are homosexuals they can still receive the blessing.
Hogwash...Popes have been heretics....in their private teaching.....they can't teach error when they preach Ex Cathedra, this is the teaching of Vatican I's Dei Filius
You should reflect my friend, what was the need for this?
@@bruno-bnvm who is this quote for? I was simply stating facts, yes, a Pope can be a heretic, in fact one was, in his private teaching...Pope Honorius...they are prevented from teaching error Ex-Cathedra, such as the Major dogmas or when Canonizing a saint...
@@glennlanham6309 Hello my friend. I also thought once that pope Honorius was a heretic, as well as John XXII... But after a bit more of research they were not.
@@glennlanham6309 As far as I can see in tradition, a pope could (maybe) believe in material heresy as a private theologian or roman bishop, but they cant teach material nor formal heresy in their universal magisterium.
Please tell Dr. Martin to let you, Matt, and others to speak a little more without his interruptions. He is so very intelligent, for sure, but let others share. Thank you.
???
Exactly the Opposite here.
Matt seems to be beating around the bush & Ralphs Clear responses are cut short. An UNCOMFORTABLE session here with ??? motivations.
The primary ambiguity is coming from mouths like Dr Martin who are misrepresenting the magesterium
? This isn’t Fr James Martin
Yes, this is the second time that Ralph Martin has gone off on UA-cam completely misrepresenting the facts and being uncharitable to the Holy Father / his Magisterium as a result.
@@catholickirbyI agree. In this case, the transgender dubia is pretty clear and only people that are looking to read the Pope suspiciously could possibly be confused by it.
its clear you folks are too young to remember the clarity and charity of John Paul II, as I say above, read the Encyclical Veritatis Splendor, it contradicts all this blessing sin mess
@@glennlanham6309 Nowhere does this document or any other document from this Pontificate say that we can bless sin. You and others are interpreting things uncharitably.
BEGUM ORDODOX
We need Michael Lofton on the show to be fair to pope Francis
Matt when do you finally become a "rad-trad" we are getting proven with each passing day
maybe its the only way out of the Apostasy going on? I hate to admit it, been to one Latin mass in my life...
@@glennlanham6309 Been going to the TLM for over 25 years have not looked back...and yes Vatican 2 is part of the problem
Your nasty slur regarding Pope Francis is sinful. Jesus promised that the Holy Spirit would always be with the pope. Think before you speak.
Yeah, let's ignore the letters and responses that clarify.
Let's get swept up by political media.
Let's start accusing the holy father of teaching heresy.
For shame. You people should be ashamed.
No Bergoglio should be ashamed....for the destruction he has caused
@@sergesavard636 What destruction did he specifically cause?
On the day you die and you meet God, and God tells you that you falsely accused Pope Francis, what are you going to do? Argue with God?
@@videonmode8649I would be more concerned about your unbiblical authority given to the pope. Do you really think God will judge someone harshly for following scripture and rejecting the false doctrines of a fallible man.
@@vladtheinhaler8940
Jesus gave authority to the apostles to forgive/withhold sin, and Peter was given authority over the church that Christ established.
What part of the Bible said Jesus established his scripture before he ascended into heaven?
Jesus condoned, even approved of, homosexuality. (Gospel according to Eugenius, chapter V, 5-6 and Chapter XI, 9).
No, He really did not.
I used to like this channel but with guest like this Dr not much. Why you invite people that bring confusion and lies?
sorry, but it seems to me that the "confusion" is coming from the vatican. Why make unclear statements that confuses people and sometimes just sounds weird/wrong when you can be very explicit about your stance on these kinds of issues? There's already enough confusion in this world. The last place we want any form of confusion/controversy is in the church. God help us.
@@michaelvik870 you know I used to get confused depending on who I followed. Since I started to follow “Reason and Theology” channel on UA-cam now I understand most clearly the things that pope says. Because you can’t judge the pope just for what he says today you have to listen what he said yesterday and then you will understand better. But this people just talk bad about the pope for what he said today because he was not clear but why they don’t check what he said yesterday about the same topic
@@apologeticasanmiguelarcangel yeah true. But making statements that sound so ambiguous that their interpretation is almost dependent on how the reader interprets them, doesn't help either. My major concern is why all the ambiguity? And I also watch "Reason and theology" too, nice channel.
@@michaelvik870 you know we all want another Saint Paul in every pope we have but they are all different and they act according to their personality
@@michaelvik870 I am astounded by the lack of catechesis in the comments...the very Catechism contradicts what's going on...
Mr. Martin is wrong here. It isn’t ambiguous unless you want it to be. What PF said in 2021 hasn’t repudiated.
Just another Catholic I used to respect going down the dark route of dividing the Church
that's where this is so blind, itS FRANCIS dividing the church, by departing from every other Pope in history re: sexual morality
@@glennlanham6309 how has he deviated? Please site your sources
@@ajmeier8114 his own head of the CDF, Cardinal Ladaria, in response to the gay marriage controversy, said "You can't bless sin" (unquote). Now Francis is allowing priests, 3 years later, to bless gay unions. I don't need a source. Its public domain. And you still can't bless sin. Period. As I keep repeating, read Veritatis Splendor, Chapters 1 and 3 specifically, where St. JPII says you can't modify the truth to meet someone's life situations. Some actions are always intrinsically evil.
@@ajmeier8114 may I spin this question, in rabbinic fashion, back at you? Name ONE SINGLE POPE, besides Francis, who said you can bless a sinful relationship....in 2000 years?
@@glennlanham6309 this is a lie. PF clearly said you can’t bless gay unions. He never said this. Read the documents yourself. Don’t reply on others
There is no ambiguity . How do you justify misrepresenting what the Pope has said? Read the documents and you will see it is clear. No gay marriage, you have to repent to be a godparent if you have been in sin, if you are a invalid marriage you need to go to confession and work to correct it before you can receive the Eucharist.
Ralph Martin really needs to stop what he’s doing and actually see what’s going on. He himself (probably without meaning to) is the one spreading ambiguity and uncertainty about what the Popes are teaching and reaffirming. If a sincere Catholic would actually read the documents that are straight from the Vatican instead of relying on hearsay, none of the current tempests in a teapot would bother them.
Ambiguity? You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
If there is a heretical interpretation, it is intentional, so stop making that interpretation seem ambiguous. “I think I can see how that might be okay” is not good enough. Such is the point of the many dubias sent to Bergoglio, and always, the most heretical interpretation possible is the one that he validates, if he answers at all.
Pope Francis = G.O.A.T
Huh? Why?
@@adjd1576This guy trolls on Trent’s channel too.
@@LLL-tr2dy You mean I make valid arguments that Christians get upset over??
Ba ha ha ha ha ha hanha ha.. worst pope since Alexander VI
@@thomaskeane6076 another who thinks he knows more than the former head of the CDF
Why give this guy a platform?
The Pope isn't entertaining blessing sin... He's Calling All To Come To Jesus Christ! He's calling all to repentance from where they are!!!
We can't bless sin, this isn't now being repudiated. The guy is confused Matt.
All this can be laid at the feet of Bergoglio....since he will not stop it