This is Why the B-2 Spirit was Never Caught in 30 Years

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 18 тра 2024
  • Since its introduction in 1997, the B-2 Spirit stealth bomber has flown countless missions all around the world and has never been engaged or shot down. Watch the video to find out about the insane engineering that made this possible and how one of the biggest screw ups of the Soviet Union lead to this incredible aircraft design.
    For more documentaries about insane feats of engineering, please subscribe to / @insane.engineering
    Inspired by:
    • B-2 Stealth Bomber - F...
    • The Unbelievable Power...
    • Stealth - How Does it ...
    #engineering #documentary #b2 #stealth #bomber
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 185

  • @tpespos
    @tpespos 2 місяці тому +102

    The most powerful stealth bomber in service is like telling your only child they are your favorite

    • @reed510
      @reed510 2 місяці тому +1

      There is the B-21

    • @xodiaq
      @xodiaq 2 місяці тому +3

      @@reed510hasn’t entered service yet

    • @LunarSecrets
      @LunarSecrets 2 місяці тому

      It's safe to say some children will probably never be publicly acknowledged.

    • @Shadow__133
      @Shadow__133 2 місяці тому +3

      ⁠@@xodiaqOr has it... you just haven't seen it? 🤔

    • @Sajuuk
      @Sajuuk 2 місяці тому

      😂😂👍

  • @swlak516
    @swlak516 2 місяці тому +19

    Great video!
    However, I thought the background music was a bit too loud.
    Keep up the good work.

  • @glenn_r_frank_author
    @glenn_r_frank_author 2 місяці тому +5

    Loved the video.. love the B-2. Can't wait to see the B-21 Raider go into full service!

  • @user-cz4so5up3i
    @user-cz4so5up3i 3 місяці тому +30

    Just keep at it man, your stuffs too good to go unnoticed

    • @Insane.Engineering
      @Insane.Engineering  3 місяці тому +2

      Thanks, will do!

    • @yoJuicy
      @yoJuicy 2 місяці тому

      @@Insane.Engineering increase your volume a little. It was a little quiet

  • @arturwisniewski3747
    @arturwisniewski3747 2 місяці тому +2

    well done! good, informative and with nice rhythm. keep up good work!

  • @markstrickland8736
    @markstrickland8736 2 місяці тому +5

    The music makes it difficult to understand the narrator.

  • @studido
    @studido 2 місяці тому +19

    New sub, this channel is going to blow up if you continue with this quality 100%
    Edit: He had 336 subs when I made this comment

    • @ardaokay6862
      @ardaokay6862 2 місяці тому

      Well I guess you are right 🗿

  • @technik27
    @technik27 2 місяці тому +9

    nope, the problem is not flat surfaces or spherical surfaces. The problem is surfaces at 90 degrees to each other, because the double reflection reflects the biggest fraction of light (radio) back to the source. Look up how reflectors work, or Fresnel reflectance.

    • @martin309
      @martin309 2 місяці тому +1

      Op knows, but thats true a sphere is bad on all directions as stated. Your exemple (2 surfaces at 90°) would be ok from the back to +45° in two directions so just fly in reverse and you're better off than a sphere.

    • @technik27
      @technik27 2 місяці тому

      @@martin309 a good way to see why a sphere is not really too bad is thinking of it as a mirror. If you look at yourself in a mirror that's shaped like a sphere (like a small metallic ball, or a ball bearing), you will notice that your reflection looks very tiny. It would be the same with radar. Spheres actually scatter incoming light across all directions, which is exactly what you want to do for stealth. The reason two 90 degrees surfaces are bad, is because they weill back-scatter from any direction you look at it. The first surface reflects on the second, and 90 deg + 90 deg make 180, so light comes back to where it came from, no matter the angle.

    • @martin309
      @martin309 2 місяці тому

      @@technik27 hey, not gonna lie at first I thought exactly like you. With radar absorbant materials your waves goes through not only the first and second face but back to the first so albeit a sphere would be smaller on radar, wave would be reduced one time only and on all directions.
      As you do when you go through radar's field.
      To prove my point a worse case radar return would be a surface flat face at the radar at all times, which is what a sphere does if you think about it...

    • @technik27
      @technik27 2 місяці тому

      But a sphere only has an infinitesimal area pointed in the radar's direction at any time, so the backscatter is really small. A 90 deg reflector, on the other hand, will reflect a high percentage of radar back to the incoming direction, even when it's not intentionally oriented. This used to increase the radar cross section on aircraft because wings would be mounted at 90 degrees to the body and act like reflectors. And the engine intakes of old jets had a similar issue. Until people started understanding Fresnel better and avoiding 90 deg angles. I'm not making this up, this is just how the math works out.

  • @BrentLeVasseur
    @BrentLeVasseur 2 місяці тому +48

    Actually it’s not invisible to radar, and in fact the older WWII era lower frequency radar can detect any and all stealth aircraft, including the B2. What it IS stealthy to is the higher frequency tracking and targeting radar that is used to guide missiles to a target. So in reality you CAN see it and know it’s in the area, but it’s incredibly difficult to accurately target and shoot down due to the fact that you can’t use the older radar to accurately guide missiles to a target. It’s also visible to phased array radars where you have two or more radars linked together with multiple receivers. However, its again hard to target. Much of this was addressed, supposedly in the newer B21 Raider which was launched last year and is more stealthy than the B2.

    • @sabundus590
      @sabundus590 2 місяці тому

      How many people are still believing the low frequency myth from the Kosovo war… no, low frequency cannot detect stealth planes. It just messes up your radar.

    • @pavlesrepfler2900
      @pavlesrepfler2900 2 місяці тому +1

      Jedan je vidjen i oboren iznad Srbije.

    • @CoochSmooch
      @CoochSmooch 2 місяці тому

      why cant u use older low frequency radar to guide missles? and how did the B21 get around that flaw?

    • @BrentLeVasseur
      @BrentLeVasseur 2 місяці тому +2

      @@CoochSmooch Because of the wavelength of the signal is too large to accurately plot the plane’s position over time in order to guide a missile to hit it. As for how the B21 solves some of those issues… I said ‘supposedly’ because I don’t know for sure. I’m pretty sure it was part of the design, but since it’s classified, I have really have no idea if they succeeded or not, or exactly what they did to solve those issues. Over time as the B21 is used in real world missions, we will discover if the engineers at Lockheed were successful or not, and possibly learn how and what they did. But right now, there isn’t much publicly available information since the plane is still relatively new and very classified.

    • @colereynolds2080
      @colereynolds2080 2 місяці тому

      @@BrentLeVasseur B21 is a Northrop plane. And you have it backwards. B2 is hidden from long range, low frequency radar.

  • @milk-it
    @milk-it 2 місяці тому +2

    Facts and footage with neutral narration. This is the recipe for an empirical documentary. Subbed and liked.

  • @klephenthurry3284
    @klephenthurry3284 2 місяці тому +5

    I subbed. The overview of the Stealth Technology combined with the "Doom Eternal" style music is top tier!!!

  • @randyrobertson4686
    @randyrobertson4686 2 місяці тому +4

    The most undetectable aircraft including highly advanced avionics and stealth technology for its time and it eventually got hit and the United States was just like…”yeah, go ahead and keep it…it’s eons ahead of your tech but I guess we’ll throw you a bone and let you waste your time reverse engineering it”. “That’s 1970’s tech and an you all are still trying to figure out the doorknob, we have a few new things that will blow your mind, so keep it…merry Christmas”. Even the SR-71 was Kelly Johnson’s creation and he started on that project in the 60’s.

    • @mike7652
      @mike7652 2 місяці тому +1

      That was an F-117, not a B-2.
      You tried though!

  • @jdub5981
    @jdub5981 2 місяці тому +1

    Great video! Subbed

  • @edp5226
    @edp5226 2 місяці тому +1

    keep making quality educational videos. i see potential.

  • @jamiekirkland2474
    @jamiekirkland2474 2 місяці тому +7

    The F117 nighthawk was NOT a bomber. The F stands for fighter, the B in B2 or B21 stands for bomber

    • @brandonadams7837
      @brandonadams7837 2 місяці тому +8

      Correct in its classification, except it’s not actually a fighter. No air to air missiles, no guns. In practicality it was just a small bomber.

    • @jamiekirkland2474
      @jamiekirkland2474 2 місяці тому

      @@brandonadams7837 fair enough

    • @shenmisheshou7002
      @shenmisheshou7002 2 місяці тому

      @@brandonadams7837 I agree but I would have said that its Military Unified Designation System (the "F") was for Fighter, but the aircraft was indeed an attack aircraft, and should have been designated "A-117". A in the system is attack. Now had the designated it F/A such as is the case with the F/A 18, that would have worked. The F-105 was another case where the aircraft carried the "Fighter" designation, but was mostly built as an attack aircraft, though it did have more gun kills during Vietnam than the "Last Gunfighter" F8. The 105 had about 25 gun kills, and the F8 only had one pure gun kill, with a couple of more being planes that were finished off with guns after being hit with sidewinders. Interestingly, the F/A 18 and F/A-18 and FA-18E/F arereally the only US aircraft I know that had the F/A designation. The F-125 should likewise be redesignated as F/A-35 but the Air Force does not like the term "Attack" and prefers the more scary "Fighter" designation, though it is unlikely that a US F-35 will ever shoot down a Russian or Chinese Air Force plane. Even the F-22 has never shot down anything but a balloon. Wow.

    • @3dpyromaniac560
      @3dpyromaniac560 Місяць тому

      ​​​​​@@shenmisheshou7002i mean yeah, but for how much smarter the USAF is than everyone else (in their opinion), they have the most fucked implementation of universal designation. Constantly reused designations, nonsequential numbering, purposefully designating certain aircraft with incorrect mission types (looking at you U-2), and lets never forget the B-21 raider was designated as such because _"The designation B-21 recognizes the Raider as the first bomber of the 21st century."_

    • @3dpyromaniac560
      @3dpyromaniac560 Місяць тому

      Seriously though, here is a quick sampling of high profile bomber aircraft designations from the air force alongside service life
      B-2 Condor : 1929-1934
      B-3 : 1929-1940
      B-17 : 1935-1959
      B-24 : 1939-1968
      B-25 : 1940-1979
      B-26 : 1940-1946
      B-29 : 1942-1960
      B-32 : 1942-1945
      B-47 : 1947-1977
      B-50 : 1947-1965
      B-52 : 1952-2050
      B-58 : 1956-1970
      B-1 : 1974-"mid 2020s"
      B-2 : 1989-"mid 2020s"
      B-21 : "mid 2020s"-?

  • @slyarts1
    @slyarts1 2 місяці тому +11

    Hey mate you’re making great videos. One issue is your voice over audio!
    You need to 2x the gain on your microphone or adjust track loudness for your voice. Remember the people who aren’t using a phone or headphones.
    Your story, timeline, narrative and concept is great and I thoroughly enjoyed this video.
    Thank you!

    • @Insane.Engineering
      @Insane.Engineering  2 місяці тому +2

      Thank you for your feedback! Someone else has already pointed out the same thing. In the video after the next one the sound volume will be lower.

  • @ASDLVR
    @ASDLVR 3 місяці тому +7

    this channel is insanley underrated, idk you only have 42 subscribers, this video mustve been hard to make aswell.

    • @Insane.Engineering
      @Insane.Engineering  3 місяці тому +1

      Thanks! It exists only since about a month ago, that‘s why. I hope it starts growing soon! Like, share and subscribe… 😉

  • @endecy
    @endecy 2 місяці тому +1

    Great stuff!

  • @TheSoloist1Alone
    @TheSoloist1Alone 2 місяці тому

    2:55 what a great accomplishment to be ahead of your time 🙏🏾✊🏾💯

  • @Sajuuk
    @Sajuuk 2 місяці тому +1

    Stealth aircraft CAN be detected by radar, they're just detected much later i.e. instead of being detected at 300km its only detected at 30km.
    It's also hard to achieve a lock by SAM systems and identity the type, which in turn means the kill chain is interrupted and the aircraft cannot be fired upon by missiles.
    Firing active seeker missiles into the general area and expecting the missile's radar to detect it will again be met by the same problems.

  • @SoloSailing77
    @SoloSailing77 2 місяці тому +8

    I don't live close to any Air Force bases. We did have a great air show until they got greedy. I watched an F-14 display, an F-117 and B-2 Spirit flyover. I also spotted a NASA SR-71 surveying the Great Lakes, way back. Hard to believe the B-2 Spirit has a radar cross section of a marble, when you are standing under one flying overhead. The new B-21 Raider is much smaller than a marble. The B-21 went into production within a week of its first test flight.

  • @fieryweasel
    @fieryweasel 2 місяці тому +1

    The B2 greets targets by saying "LO" and then dropping its payload.

  • @donquixote1502
    @donquixote1502 2 місяці тому +1

    What a wonderful design. ❤ from Sweden.

  • @marvinochieng6295
    @marvinochieng6295 2 місяці тому +1

    i feel bad you dont have more subs. Great content

    • @Insane.Engineering
      @Insane.Engineering  2 місяці тому +1

      Thanks! It‘s a very new channel and I‘m still learning to make better videos… I‘m sure more people will subscribe soon 😊

  • @oxcart4172
    @oxcart4172 2 місяці тому +1

    Your channel is very promising. Good luck.

  • @stevenlarratt3638
    @stevenlarratt3638 2 місяці тому +4

    New sub here, #keepitgoing.

  • @45pints87
    @45pints87 2 місяці тому

    Great channel

  • @mikepod637
    @mikepod637 2 місяці тому

    I remember I was at a ND vs Air Force game and they flew this as the fly over pregame. Couldn’t see it til it was right over us. Couldn’t imagine that being ur last sight before getting bombed to pixie dust

  • @dosmastrify
    @dosmastrify 2 місяці тому +1

    A channel named insane engineering?
    Brian McManus has entered the chat

  • @tomsmith2587
    @tomsmith2587 2 місяці тому +3

    This thing is crazy and it's been around since the 90's! Imagine the insane engineering and technology of the B-21!

    • @King-ui8gz
      @King-ui8gz 2 місяці тому

      Afghanistan and sirya don't have any advanced radar systems, Right now Russia and china have the capability to detect it😊

    • @davisklein5720
      @davisklein5720 2 місяці тому +2

      @@King-ui8gzyou’re clueless

    • @mike7652
      @mike7652 2 місяці тому

      ​@@King-ui8gz

  • @MatthewMurrayPhD
    @MatthewMurrayPhD 2 місяці тому

    It would be great if you could do a show on Burt Rutan's Long EZ airplane.

  • @erk1920
    @erk1920 2 місяці тому

    Great video. Can you given the name of the referencces shown in the video?

  • @ChrisMorton
    @ChrisMorton 2 місяці тому +1

    Please could you do a documentary on three gorges dam. Also something else of interest might be evolution of rockets and the space shuttle.

    • @Insane.Engineering
      @Insane.Engineering  2 місяці тому +1

      Thanks for the idea! It will take a while to make these videos, so please be patient.

  • @falvegas511
    @falvegas511 3 місяці тому +2

    Great Bomber

  • @vycka369852
    @vycka369852 2 місяці тому

    Imagine what they really have if we are allowed to see this 😮

  • @AB-nv7bz
    @AB-nv7bz 2 місяці тому +1

    Was it ever tested by air defenses? Seems like we would eradicate the defenses with missiles, then sent in a b2 so we could tell the press.

  • @preppertrucker5736
    @preppertrucker5736 2 місяці тому

    B-21 Raider has entered the chat……

  • @World-427
    @World-427 2 місяці тому

    Nice job with the information and animation. Just one small problem, you're speaking a bit too slowly, maybe an increase of 25-50% in the speed is more desirable.

  • @Istandby666
    @Istandby666 2 місяці тому

    From 1984 to 1992, I grew up in the Mojave desert around Edwards Air Force Base. My biological father worked there and at Groom Lake aka Area 51.
    Growing up in the Above Top Secret Government black projects was a great life.
    It's nice to see how people of today think these old ass aircraft are interesting. Imagine growing up and knowing about these aircraft before the public ever knew.

  • @robertmukuka8565
    @robertmukuka8565 2 місяці тому

    its never met the s400 triumph yet...

  • @TheLfamily24
    @TheLfamily24 2 місяці тому

    “WE ARE NOT A WASTE IF MONEY” US Government

  • @AnthonyDixon-vq4yn
    @AnthonyDixon-vq4yn 2 місяці тому +1

    Is stealth aircraft carrier

  • @IlikeCatF
    @IlikeCatF 2 місяці тому

    Seems like this information is classified.

  • @shenmisheshou7002
    @shenmisheshou7002 2 місяці тому

    The B2 is absolutely detectable but most jihadist don't have the money for an S band radar. Thousands of missions is not the same as thousands of combat missions. It has only been used in about 60 combat missions and all against third world opponents.

  • @chrisstrebor
    @chrisstrebor 2 місяці тому

    They've never fought anyone worthwhile thats why.

  • @TrusePkay
    @TrusePkay 2 місяці тому

    Stealth is not forever

  • @albertgerard4639
    @albertgerard4639 2 місяці тому +1

    Old host was so bad😂

  • @julyseven808
    @julyseven808 2 місяці тому +1

    F117 was shot down in 1999.🧐🧐😎

    • @cruisinguy6024
      @cruisinguy6024 2 місяці тому +1

      Yes but only because they got extremely lucky due to poor mission planning by the usaf

    • @walkingtree6732
      @walkingtree6732 2 місяці тому

      ​@@cruisinguy6024 also extremely lucky as the radar waves were only able to get reflected back at the radar because the bomb bay doors were open

  • @tylerdurden4006
    @tylerdurden4006 2 місяці тому

    You should probably ask turkey how the f 35 isn't stealth since they use the Russian S-400 anyi air system and they could see and track it over the black seas, which is why this "fighter" will never be deployed east against Russia.

    • @Coinz8
      @Coinz8 2 місяці тому

      Thats a fucking LIE

    • @tylerdurden4006
      @tylerdurden4006 2 місяці тому

      ​@Coinz8 that is actually really easy to search on the internet.

  • @pedda66
    @pedda66 2 місяці тому +1

    Get rid of the annoying "music " which is too loud and makes it difficult to hear your voice. Otherwise very good.

    • @Insane.Engineering
      @Insane.Engineering  2 місяці тому +1

      Will do in upcoming videos. Thanks for the feedback!

    • @user-lm4zw5kf2l
      @user-lm4zw5kf2l 2 місяці тому +1

      I agree, actually, it's just a little loud

    • @blink182bfsftw
      @blink182bfsftw 2 місяці тому

      Must be your speakers, sounds fine on my headphones

  • @danielbarnes7559
    @danielbarnes7559 2 місяці тому +1

    No stealth aircraft is invisible to radar just really "dim", like a cb radio radio radars have a "squelch" feature to minimize the amount of stuff the operator has to deal with, most US stealth aircraft have such a low radar return the typical radar settings of opponents will just ignore them

    • @TrusePkay
      @TrusePkay 2 місяці тому

      Stealth is not forever

  • @allenzophy4262
    @allenzophy4262 2 місяці тому

    Sir, the United States has no peer in terms of air power

  • @damianlabon265
    @damianlabon265 2 місяці тому

    Air Force didn't exist in 1943. it was the US Army then

  • @alfonsovelasco9627
    @alfonsovelasco9627 2 місяці тому

    One thing is to be detected and another tracked and successfully engaged. If you claim the B2 has NEVER being detected, you are seriously
    misguiding your audience. With all due respect.

  • @sanmasano7696
    @sanmasano7696 2 місяці тому

    Why, when you mention the Soviet Union, you talk about the "Russian" territory. Unfortunately, there were 15 countries, 15 republics in that "union". Therefore, in the future, I would like to see a more precise definition in your videos.

  • @wilmerpola5548
    @wilmerpola5548 2 місяці тому

    Lmfao how does it work????

  • @rushzeen
    @rushzeen 2 місяці тому

    because it never flew over the skies it was designed and supposed to fly, it was busy in the middleast region.. can it survive over chinese or russian skies

    • @TrusePkay
      @TrusePkay 2 місяці тому

      I tell you, just like the F-117, it will carry out successful missions and survive the first few weeks, and when the first one is suddenly downed, the US government will prepare its retirement

    • @Coinz8
      @Coinz8 2 місяці тому

      Wrong@@TrusePkay

  • @richbrown9690
    @richbrown9690 2 місяці тому

    electrogravitics

  • @ImReverseGiraffe
    @ImReverseGiraffe 2 місяці тому

    Its nuclear, not nucular. There is only one u in nuclear.

  • @user-ku4gl3iy2k
    @user-ku4gl3iy2k 2 місяці тому +3

    เครื่องบินทิ้งระเบิดปรมณูของสหรัฐอเมริกาอยู่ที่ผม1ลำมหัศจรรย์แท้ฯ

  • @OMG2SEXY
    @OMG2SEXY 2 місяці тому +3

    Radar detection is not how aircraft are detected any longer. There are classified satellites that detect anything with a radiation signature such as infrared, radio wave emission, unnatural atmospheric friction etc…

    • @uberdisco
      @uberdisco 2 місяці тому

      This is incorrect.

    • @Primus54
      @Primus54 2 місяці тому

      Sure… and everyone knows that developing, launching, and operating a fleet of such satellites is easy and cheap, right? 🙄

  • @felixlarbi1523
    @felixlarbi1523 2 місяці тому

    Why do u keep telling your adversaries everything about u

  • @MrLucidity
    @MrLucidity 2 місяці тому

    "Radar Waves"? WTAF!
    p.s The bots are out n force n your comment section hahahaa!

  • @SuperEr90
    @SuperEr90 2 місяці тому

    It’s only stealthy against 3rd world countries

  • @uberdisco
    @uberdisco 2 місяці тому +78

    Never been engaged or shot down? How many times did this plane fly against a peer adversary? Dropping bombs in Afghanistan and Syria where air superiority is achieved against a non peer enemy is nothing to write home about but hey, you do you.

    • @GabelhelmSogarbraten
      @GabelhelmSogarbraten 2 місяці тому +57

      I honestly dont think there is anything as a peer adversary for the US military
      Sure russia and china may claim to be but there is a huge difference between propaganda and actual capabilities

    • @Primus54
      @Primus54 2 місяці тому +32

      So… after a well researched and produced video explaining stealth technology that’s understandable to a broad audience, THAT’S your focus? 🙄

    • @benjibernardino1728
      @benjibernardino1728 2 місяці тому +2

      😂

    • @robertojofre15
      @robertojofre15 2 місяці тому

      Good point

    • @nightbladexxx
      @nightbladexxx 2 місяці тому +23

      You don't think the Russians helped out Syria and sent their best air defense radars and systems since they know the B2 was in the air and they wanted first hand knowledge?

  • @Liam_219
    @Liam_219 2 місяці тому

    Not the ai generated thumbnail 💀

  • @emubabu4873
    @emubabu4873 2 місяці тому

    It's mission success ratio is only 27%. It can't fly in rain under any thunderstorms. Such an overrated & expensive junk of piece of military avaition.

  • @DonWan47
    @DonWan47 2 місяці тому

    Because it was never used against a peer adversary. Bombing goat farmers without an IADS is hardly testing its stealth capabilities.
    Awful video.

  • @josephforrest3713
    @josephforrest3713 2 місяці тому +2

    Beeeeecause there's less of them than there are SU57's, and because they where so incredibly expensive to operate, they didn't see much service. Plus they never actually engaged a true peer threat...
    Just sayin'...

    • @Primus54
      @Primus54 2 місяці тому +1

      A “pear” threat? I don’t think the B-2 was designed to counter attacks by fruit. 🙄

    • @josephforrest3713
      @josephforrest3713 2 місяці тому

      @@Primus54 What?

    • @Primus54
      @Primus54 2 місяці тому +1

      @@josephforrest3713 Fast edit.

    • @josephforrest3713
      @josephforrest3713 2 місяці тому +1

      @@Primus54 :p

  • @7timecenturycyclistvespada982
    @7timecenturycyclistvespada982 2 місяці тому

    I flew the stealth bomber in several top secret incursions into the USSR during the Cold War in the 1970’s yes we had it then that’s why it’s called top secret was fun times also I am a very successful ocean front property in Antarctica real estate agent if interested look me uo

  • @MS-wz9jm
    @MS-wz9jm 2 місяці тому

    Why was it never caught? What a silly title. The US never fights a capable force, it has never once gone up against a country with long range attack, or large layered integrated air defence. In short the US has never fought anyone. To say that goat herders could not shoot down a B-2 doesnt mean much..

    • @roderickxuan4573
      @roderickxuan4573 2 місяці тому +1

      So you are saying that we never tested the B-2 against our own IAD and other ranges like the one at Red Flag? In radar testing, radar contact is just as good as a missile contact. So from that perspective, the B-2 gone against the best.

  • @user-cn3vp1on3m
    @user-cn3vp1on3m 2 місяці тому

    Because it has always been used against unarmed and weak militaries like syria iraq iran (at one time weak country) so it was never caught. 😂😂😂😂😂

    • @cruisinguy6024
      @cruisinguy6024 2 місяці тому +1

      lol what? Iraq had the most defended air space in the world before the US came along and had a massive army