Insane Engineering
Insane Engineering
  • 36
  • 171 476
The Most Insane Hidden Features of the F-35
When the F-35 participates in training exercises, it typically defeats adversary aircraft at a rate of better than 20-to-1. Watch the video to find out what are the most insane hidden features that makes the F-35 fighter jet a real badass plane.
For more documentaries about insane feats of engineering, please subscribe to www.youtube.com/@Insane.Engineering
#f35 #stealth #engineering #documentary
Переглядів: 4 674

Відео

What Does Boston Dynamics Want With Atlas?
Переглядів 716Місяць тому
Boston Dynamics' Atlas is probably the world's most well-known humanoid. It has been entertaining the world for a more than decade with videos on UA-cam. But why is Boston Dynamics building it? What is the ultimate goal? Shortly after making of this video, Boston Dynamics has released a video of a new version of Atlas. I will make a video about the new Atlas soon, but in the meantime I invite y...
Meet Optimus: Why is Tesla Building a Robot?
Переглядів 6 тис.Місяць тому
Elon Musk recently started to develop a general purpose humanoid robot named Optimus. In this video, we will learn all about it and discuss why Elon Musk thinks it will change the world's economy forever. For more documentaries about insane feats of engineering, please subscribe to www.youtube.com/@Insane.Engineering Inspired by: ua-cam.com/video/cpraXaw7dyc/v-deo.html ua-cam.com/users/shorts8v...
Da Vinci: Is the Best Surgeon a Robot?
Переглядів 162Місяць тому
World-class surgeons can use the Da Vinci robotic system to perform robotic surgery and treat a range of complex surgeries including cancer and other severe conditions. Watch the video to find out everything you need to know about the world’s most advanced surgical robotic system. For more documentaries about insane feats of engineering, please subscribe to www.youtube.com/@Insane.Engineering I...
How Taipei 101 withstands Earthquakes and Typhoons
Переглядів 9603 місяці тому
Taipei 101 is the most iconic structure in Taipei, if not in all of Taiwan. It is one of the tallest buildings built inside an earthquake zone, the tower is located just 200 meters (660 feet) away from a major fault line. In this video, we discuss how Taipei 101 is able to withstand extreme earthquakes and typhoons. For more documentaries about insane feats of engineering, please subscribe to w...
Starlink: Genius Innovation or Astronomical Menace?
Переглядів 1,5 тис.3 місяці тому
Starlink: Genius Innovation or Astronomical Menace?
How the Large Hadron Collider Found the "God Particle"
Переглядів 1,3 тис.3 місяці тому
How the Large Hadron Collider Found the "God Particle"
This is Why the B-2 Spirit was Never Caught in 30 Years
Переглядів 146 тис.4 місяці тому
This is Why the B-2 Spirit was Never Caught in 30 Years
Colonizing Mars with Starship: The Method Behind the Madness
Переглядів 4014 місяці тому
Colonizing Mars with Starship: The Method Behind the Madness
ITER: How the World’s Biggest Fusion Energy Project Advances
Переглядів 4,5 тис.4 місяці тому
ITER: How the World’s Biggest Fusion Energy Project Advances
Seattle’s Insane Tunnel: Is It Really Earthquake-Proof?
Переглядів 1434 місяці тому
Seattle’s Insane Tunnel: Is It Really Earthquake-Proof?
How the ALMA Telescope Can See Black Holes and Merging Galaxies
Переглядів 1515 місяців тому
How the ALMA Telescope Can See Black Holes and Merging Galaxies

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @jyy9624
    @jyy9624 13 годин тому

    Hahahaha free world allies all have nighthawks

  • @Cody38Super
    @Cody38Super 2 дні тому

    I wonder if you will mention in the Su-57 video that's it's actually an Su-27 Flanker with a fiberglass body kit, Flanker Avionics, Flanker weapons Systems and Flanker Engines....making it a 4th Gen aircraft with the same VARIFIED RADAR CROSS SECTION as an F/A-18 Super Hornet(or just a tiny bit less) and that it is NOT a STEALTH AIRCRAFT! ? ! ? Perhaps, if they can steal more technology from us now, in 30-40 years, Russia might be able to produce an aircraft as advanced as our 27 year old plane is now in the F-22!

  • @pauldean8638
    @pauldean8638 4 дні тому

    I see people mentioning NGAD , I heard that for 20 years 🤭. So where does a 29% operational US f35 fleet fit in ? , don’t non of you watch the senate ? That was the admission by the airforce under Matt geatez questioning . Hunters enter service this year and they built to stalk stealth fighters.

  • @MrChosenOne757
    @MrChosenOne757 4 дні тому

    This is what they allow you to know and this just the F-35 imagine what the F-22 have as well as the NGAD for the Air Force and FX-XXX for the Navy

    • @lesseirgpapers9245
      @lesseirgpapers9245 4 дні тому

      They keep it a secret, that you can use it as a bathtub and as a paperweight. 🤣

    • @MrChosenOne757
      @MrChosenOne757 4 дні тому

      @@lesseirgpapers9245 This is not China remember that

  • @Diafragmates
    @Diafragmates 4 дні тому

    good video but quit the little sfx

  • @stanislavt6376
    @stanislavt6376 4 дні тому

    The US Army does not adopt these planes. Because the F-35 is good only on paper and commercial

  • @silentblackhole
    @silentblackhole 4 дні тому

    Note: It's Joint Strike Fighter. Not Joint Striker Fighter. It sounds weird when you say it like that. I enjoyed the high quality footage and 3D animations.

    • @mikeelmwood547
      @mikeelmwood547 4 дні тому

      The first two times he said it correctly, it's just a small mispronunciation by accident or bad audio recording.

    • @belushipumpkin
      @belushipumpkin 3 дні тому

      Yeah, man... Give Mr. Crazy Design a break.

  • @Constantlybusyimproving
    @Constantlybusyimproving 11 днів тому

    Stolen from German's

  • @j_william_winchester
    @j_william_winchester Місяць тому

    Now you know why electricity prices are getting higher

  • @harbifm766766
    @harbifm766766 Місяць тому

    Mostly to scam investors money..did its early robot make any real money?!!

  • @EricJS
    @EricJS Місяць тому

    Great video but it's missing mention of the new Atlas system. The hydraulic version has been completely retired

    • @Onimirare
      @Onimirare Місяць тому

      I was also expecting to hear about the new Atlas. This video was posted 15 days after Boston Dynamics presented the new Atlas and yet this guy just didn't bother to add anything about it lol

    • @Insane.Engineering
      @Insane.Engineering Місяць тому

      It takes a while to make a video and unfortunately this one was finished just when the new Atlas was presented. I'm going to make a sequel about it soon.

  • @gregorybibbs5571
    @gregorybibbs5571 Місяць тому

    The most saddest part of this whole thing is he trying to put humans out of work muskets is starting to get greedy and crippled American people this insane way destroy workers at fast food restaurants and hospitals and auto places think about it hard if he looking to replace workers what are you going to do

  • @_Ragnarocket
    @_Ragnarocket Місяць тому

    Just a note regarding Boston Dynamics Atlas, they have retired their hydrolic version and their new all electric Atlas looks very different check it out, I'd argue it's the coolest humanoid robot currently.

    • @Insane.Engineering
      @Insane.Engineering Місяць тому

      Thanks, I saw the video just a few days ago. It’s interesting, although not surprising, to see that the new Atlas is also purely electric. Unfortunately I just finished my video about the older version, so I will upload that sometime next week and then make one about the new Atlas.

  • @nils9741
    @nils9741 Місяць тому

    I'm watching a video about robots and I'm not sure if this video is AI generated. This is a dark time.

  • @zados9609
    @zados9609 2 місяці тому

    You deserve a lot more visibility on this video and on the others too! Keep going and please don’t stop, success will come soon 💪

  • @aerocynix
    @aerocynix 2 місяці тому

    Hey man! How do i contact you.

  • @oxcart4172
    @oxcart4172 2 місяці тому

    Your channel is very promising. Good luck.

  • @milk-it
    @milk-it 2 місяці тому

    You honestly couldn't cram more information into 12 minutes any more succinctly. Kudos on a job, done!

  • @vycka369852
    @vycka369852 2 місяці тому

    Imagine what they really have if we are allowed to see this 😮

  • @Sajuuk
    @Sajuuk 3 місяці тому

    Stealth aircraft CAN be detected by radar, they're just detected much later i.e. instead of being detected at 300km its only detected at 30km. It's also hard to achieve a lock by SAM systems and identity the type, which in turn means the kill chain is interrupted and the aircraft cannot be fired upon by missiles. Firing active seeker missiles into the general area and expecting the missile's radar to detect it will again be met by the same problems.

  • @mikepod637
    @mikepod637 3 місяці тому

    I remember I was at a ND vs Air Force game and they flew this as the fly over pregame. Couldn’t see it til it was right over us. Couldn’t imagine that being ur last sight before getting bombed to pixie dust

  • @iosebchikvashvili1864
    @iosebchikvashvili1864 3 місяці тому

    If successful Depend what we mean under the word "successful" To run the machine at low beta forces us to build so huge machines. Disability to heat the plasma more than 15 kEv forces us to keep plasma long time and to focus on only DT reaction. High neutron flux (1 MW/m^2 as far as I know) will damage first wall very quickly forcing us to replace costly vacuum chamber very quickly. We still very far from commercial fusion.

    • @NinjaInTheFirstDegree
      @NinjaInTheFirstDegree Місяць тому

      I think I saw a projection they hope to See ITER connect to the grid by 2035, I have hope.

  • @marsmarshall2486
    @marsmarshall2486 3 місяці тому

    X Elon

  • @robertmukuka8565
    @robertmukuka8565 3 місяці тому

    its never met the s400 triumph yet...

  • @marvinochieng6295
    @marvinochieng6295 3 місяці тому

    i feel bad you dont have more subs. Great content

    • @Insane.Engineering
      @Insane.Engineering 3 місяці тому

      Thanks! It‘s a very new channel and I‘m still learning to make better videos… I‘m sure more people will subscribe soon 😊

  • @jdub5981
    @jdub5981 3 місяці тому

    Great video! Subbed

  • @richbrown9690
    @richbrown9690 3 місяці тому

    electrogravitics

  • @shenmisheshou7002
    @shenmisheshou7002 3 місяці тому

    The B2 is absolutely detectable but most jihadist don't have the money for an S band radar. Thousands of missions is not the same as thousands of combat missions. It has only been used in about 60 combat missions and all against third world opponents.

  • @SuperEr90
    @SuperEr90 3 місяці тому

    It’s only stealthy against 3rd world countries

  • @dosmastrify
    @dosmastrify 3 місяці тому

    A channel named insane engineering? Brian McManus has entered the chat

  • @markstrickland8736
    @markstrickland8736 3 місяці тому

    The music makes it difficult to understand the narrator.

  • @chrisstrebor
    @chrisstrebor 3 місяці тому

    They've never fought anyone worthwhile thats why.

  • @sanmasano7696
    @sanmasano7696 3 місяці тому

    Why, when you mention the Soviet Union, you talk about the "Russian" territory. Unfortunately, there were 15 countries, 15 republics in that "union". Therefore, in the future, I would like to see a more precise definition in your videos.

  • @emubabu4873
    @emubabu4873 3 місяці тому

    It's mission success ratio is only 27%. It can't fly in rain under any thunderstorms. Such an overrated & expensive junk of piece of military avaition.

  • @MatthewMurrayPhD
    @MatthewMurrayPhD 3 місяці тому

    It would be great if you could do a show on Burt Rutan's Long EZ airplane.

  • @TheLfamily24
    @TheLfamily24 3 місяці тому

    “WE ARE NOT A WASTE IF MONEY” US Government

  • @jamiekirkland2474
    @jamiekirkland2474 3 місяці тому

    The F117 nighthawk was NOT a bomber. The F stands for fighter, the B in B2 or B21 stands for bomber

    • @brandonadams7837
      @brandonadams7837 3 місяці тому

      Correct in its classification, except it’s not actually a fighter. No air to air missiles, no guns. In practicality it was just a small bomber.

    • @jamiekirkland2474
      @jamiekirkland2474 3 місяці тому

      @@brandonadams7837 fair enough

    • @shenmisheshou7002
      @shenmisheshou7002 3 місяці тому

      @@brandonadams7837 I agree but I would have said that its Military Unified Designation System (the "F") was for Fighter, but the aircraft was indeed an attack aircraft, and should have been designated "A-117". A in the system is attack. Now had the designated it F/A such as is the case with the F/A 18, that would have worked. The F-105 was another case where the aircraft carried the "Fighter" designation, but was mostly built as an attack aircraft, though it did have more gun kills during Vietnam than the "Last Gunfighter" F8. The 105 had about 25 gun kills, and the F8 only had one pure gun kill, with a couple of more being planes that were finished off with guns after being hit with sidewinders. Interestingly, the F/A 18 and F/A-18 and FA-18E/F arereally the only US aircraft I know that had the F/A designation. The F-125 should likewise be redesignated as F/A-35 but the Air Force does not like the term "Attack" and prefers the more scary "Fighter" designation, though it is unlikely that a US F-35 will ever shoot down a Russian or Chinese Air Force plane. Even the F-22 has never shot down anything but a balloon. Wow.

    • @3dpyromaniac560
      @3dpyromaniac560 2 місяці тому

      ​​​​​@@shenmisheshou7002i mean yeah, but for how much smarter the USAF is than everyone else (in their opinion), they have the most fucked implementation of universal designation. Constantly reused designations, nonsequential numbering, purposefully designating certain aircraft with incorrect mission types (looking at you U-2), and lets never forget the B-21 raider was designated as such because _"The designation B-21 recognizes the Raider as the first bomber of the 21st century."_

    • @3dpyromaniac560
      @3dpyromaniac560 2 місяці тому

      Seriously though, here is a quick sampling of high profile bomber aircraft designations from the air force alongside service life B-2 Condor : 1929-1934 B-3 : 1929-1940 B-17 : 1935-1959 B-24 : 1939-1968 B-25 : 1940-1979 B-26 : 1940-1946 B-29 : 1942-1960 B-32 : 1942-1945 B-47 : 1947-1977 B-50 : 1947-1965 B-52 : 1952-2050 B-58 : 1956-1970 B-1 : 1974-"mid 2020s" B-2 : 1989-"mid 2020s" B-21 : "mid 2020s"-?

  • @ChrisMorton
    @ChrisMorton 3 місяці тому

    Please could you do a documentary on three gorges dam. Also something else of interest might be evolution of rockets and the space shuttle.

    • @Insane.Engineering
      @Insane.Engineering 3 місяці тому

      Thanks for the idea! It will take a while to make these videos, so please be patient.

  • @cruzmizzl
    @cruzmizzl 3 місяці тому

    Don't forget how they crapped all of Sadam's palaces- n his Repubican Guard during the 1st. Gulf War. Same Guard who'd smack any middle east nation any time he wanted. Except Israel [in Operation Opera].

  • @lusqwerty
    @lusqwerty 3 місяці тому

    If that plane went into battle with a real enemy with real arms. But instead it exist in a time where countries are struggling. Where countries cannot even afford to arm themselves. US is engaged in a so called war on terror where even the enemy is low tech approach they even did not manage to win in Iraq and Afghanistan. Despite pouring all of their resources billions of dollars but no single victory earned. But only dead american soldiers.

  • @ImReverseGiraffe
    @ImReverseGiraffe 3 місяці тому

    Its nuclear, not nucular. There is only one u in nuclear.

  • @MrLucidity
    @MrLucidity 3 місяці тому

    "Radar Waves"? WTAF! p.s The bots are out n force n your comment section hahahaa!

  • @thegenerictanker6953
    @thegenerictanker6953 3 місяці тому

    This is really high quality keep up the good work

  • @sagebiddi
    @sagebiddi 3 місяці тому

    6:20 lmao....are they tablet size or are they table size ?

  • @NoBetterBentley
    @NoBetterBentley 3 місяці тому

    This channel is fantastic

  • @allenzophy4262
    @allenzophy4262 3 місяці тому

    Sir, the United States has no peer in terms of air power

  • @preppertrucker5736
    @preppertrucker5736 3 місяці тому

    B-21 Raider has entered the chat……

  • @45pints87
    @45pints87 3 місяці тому

    Great channel

  • @TrusePkay
    @TrusePkay 3 місяці тому

    Stealth is not forever

  • @rushzeen
    @rushzeen 3 місяці тому

    because it never flew over the skies it was designed and supposed to fly, it was busy in the middleast region.. can it survive over chinese or russian skies

    • @TrusePkay
      @TrusePkay 3 місяці тому

      I tell you, just like the F-117, it will carry out successful missions and survive the first few weeks, and when the first one is suddenly downed, the US government will prepare its retirement

    • @Coinz8
      @Coinz8 3 місяці тому

      Wrong@@TrusePkay