In the history of visual arts we learned about his abstracts only. I had no idea that he can do it all and that is what makes an great artist. Thank you for showing it.
It's almost ridiculous to think otherwise. I think it betrays a cynicism like oh abstract artists are just phonies trying to get attention, like no there are just ideas behind them you don't want to take the time to understand 😂
I am familiar with Mondrian's geometric works. I wasn't as aware of his stylized representational works. That's why I love this channel, I am so often surprised by the depth of our favorite artists.
When I first showed my father my beginning psychedelic cartoon pictures, he would roll his eyes and utter, "Mondrian!". But, my art is nothing like his. Except for my second picture which has some rough rectangles, I almost never draw squares or rectangles or even just straight lines. And then, it ends up Mondrian was a quite good Impressionist (which I will call blurred realism), which I also am not. Mom would call out, "Mondrian!" sometimes, too. I'd say Klee...
The piano playing was a bit repetitive, but those paintings were extraordinary! What splendid, luminous, and dazzlingly beautiful images the fellow made. I liked the flowers, windmills, the repeated images of the tower-like building, the women model looking upwards, the haystacks, the river landscapes, the night sky portrait with a smiling E.T. looking at the observer, the stunning use of colors, both naturalistic, and abstract, as much, or more than the abstract black and white grids, filled in by the primary colors, for which he's mostly famous. This stuff wasn't in my Arthur Jansen art history book for some reason. What an inspired painter Mondrian was. Long live Piet, Vincent, Rembrandt, the dude who painted The Goldfinch, and the other Dutch masters who made such superb art work! I see a red ember glowing in the dark. Those dudes are better than cheap cigars!
You are doing exquisite and quiet stunning work with this collection and many, many others. Bravo! Very well done, LearnFromMasters. We are students before you. DMSwanson .
I dont mean to be off topic but does anyone know of a method to get back into an Instagram account?? I somehow forgot the login password. I would appreciate any assistance you can offer me!
@Axton Payton i really appreciate your reply. I found the site through google and im in the hacking process atm. Takes quite some time so I will get back to you later with my results.
The painting seems to be signed bottom right...perhaps the name at the top could be the dogs or the owner of the dog...or a place...Isar being a river...
Who’s music is this please? It’s very lovely music and it should be mentioned here. But I can’t see any mention of either the composer or the musician.
What nature represents is good. Maybe those drawings with a few lines on a white background had nothing to do with it. The musical background is disturbing because there is only one theme that is repeated dozens of times
@Isabela Nica........turn off the music, slow the video down to x .5 speed, get a glass of wine and watch the paintings in silence. As if in an art gallery. That should take care of it.
Very interesting artist. As of late, Is his sguares as mathatical algorithms, patterns even in realist work speculations on the metaphysics off moments?! My mentor , William Stanley Hayter claimed as a scientist, / Artist leaning toward surrealist views. That the human perception of space , volume is based on our mind configurations of our perceptions reality. Not what matter is. As in Religion, the need for configurations of the hereafter. Not that within matter , is the all powerful. As a moving force. Like the melucar cells in our bodies are in constant movements . Mondrian try to abstractly dive up space and color, aside his realism studies. Lights , color , reflections. Interesting the need to set thing down to concrete perception, when it's really a mind illution. Leonardo da Vinci sensed just that. Artist have always been on a Holy Grail as to the why's.🎨👀⚡⏳🇺🇸🇩🇰
Yeah, I don't get that colored squares stuff. It's boring. Look at it for five seconds, got it, never have to look again. Is it us... is there something wrong with us?
@@nelsonx5326 Into the twentieth century, its just with technology the globalist mafia families (developing their Central Bank strategy - eventually devolving into the current petro-dollar debt slave system) were able with film and TV, to not only solidify their control over those propaganda outlets, but with the telephone, gave them immediate connectivity to each other in a way never possible before. Actual talent being the utmost criteria for recognition at the highest levels hung on until about 1950 - the last really honored workmanship after Art Nouveau style being Art Deco. There are still mind-blowingly good painters, but they are not recognized at the very top levels - meaning they are not given one man shows at MOMA or The Met and are not touted as the best artists of our age at the Biennales, etc, etc, (and as far as sculpture, forget about it - there may be a handful who can reproduce the genius of what we see in the Louvre - but what gets promoted as genius now in sculpture a pipe-welding plumber can do aluminum boxes and boards leaned up against the wall - and 99% of human likeness sculpture if you haven't noticed are completely wooden crappy mannequins) - instead the most absurd, ridiculously simple crap a child, if not a monkey could paint is touted. There is a very good reason for that and goes back to the globalist mafia criminal families. The reason is that what is more important now in art is the propaganda power of the person chosen to be the "art darling" or the "best artist of our time" - The globalist mafia families/Central Bankster criminals who with their trillions made from drug/child/weapons trafficking (playing both sides of wars and conflicts) have absolutely bought up 100% all the fine art world at the highest and most prestigious levels. And to insure their continued perpetuity, of course just like royals of old did - EXCEPT with one in a million talent being the royals of old's criteria - no, instead, these twentieth century "royals - read criminal oligarchs" find it not only easier but much more effective and easy to find a beautiful-faced gay man or lesbian who arranges garbage on the floor or makes angry neon signage to echo their propaganda without question - it's harder to find actually one in a million genius artists that you can control 100% - no, what they want are perfectly empty vessels with no moral qualms to be simple spokespersons for whatever new perversion and abomination they want to have promoted "through art" - and oh such glorious, subtle and in synch with the times art - at least what their equally paid-off toady critics will say - and of course the equally paid-off toady curators showcase the pile of garbage like its Michelangelo's Pieta - and the greedy collectors already knowing that the garbage, just like worthless paper money, has officially stamped upon it a million dollars by the former groups simply by their advocacy and promotion of it, brainwash all the billions of the masses into believing it is "special" and worth something - although there are some who realize the game that its only this incestuous world of art criminals hyping and inflating their own crap to make money off it, and can make a lot of money quickly since the crap is easy and quick to make - unlike some hyper realist large canvas or sculpture that would take years and require a real artist that might not be on board with being their propaganda spokesperson (and forfend! might actually be ideologically opposed to them!!!! -- can't have that threat !!!) So, in short, the squares are easy to make - a competent middle schooler who is somewhat neat with paint and patient could make one in a day - the thing to remember is that there a lot of people in this world in the top 5% of wealth, and perhaps power, who all want in on making a lot more money (as well as impressing their friends ) and they don't care if its simple squares on a canvas or lavender circles on their ass, as long as its got that million dollar rubber stamp of authenticity by the art world criminals. But at bottom what is really going on is the power and influence of the ones who are made into the "art geniuses" of our time despite the garbage they produce, because its an information war now and what those people say and their ideological belief, whether real or feigned, carries a lot of weight and influences people - you certainly can't afford promoting the wrong person up the ladder and have them liking Trump!
Понятия не имел, что Мондриан был такой тонкий пейзажист. Но стал он всемирно знаменит не благодаря своим замечательным пейзажам, а своему дебильному "абстракционизму". Для того чтобы стать знаменитым в ХХ веке с хорошей живописью надо было распрощаться.
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
In the history of visual arts we learned about his abstracts only. I had no idea that he can do it all and that is what makes an great artist. Thank you for showing it.
All the great artists knew how to paint realism before they got tired of it and wanted to move into abstracts. So refreshing to see these.
It's almost ridiculous to think otherwise. I think it betrays a cynicism like oh abstract artists are just phonies trying to get attention, like no there are just ideas behind them you don't want to take the time to understand 😂
I am familiar with Mondrian's geometric works. I wasn't as aware of his stylized representational works. That's why I love this channel, I am so often surprised by the depth of our favorite artists.
Thank you for allowing these to be on this media, a thousand gold stars.
Thank you for making this stunning collection available. It is greatly appreciated.
When I first showed my father my beginning psychedelic cartoon pictures, he would roll his eyes and utter, "Mondrian!". But, my art is nothing like his. Except for my second picture which has some rough rectangles, I almost never draw squares or rectangles or even just straight lines. And then, it ends up Mondrian was a quite good Impressionist (which I will call blurred realism), which I also am not. Mom would call out, "Mondrian!" sometimes, too. I'd say Klee...
The piano playing was a bit repetitive, but those paintings were extraordinary! What splendid, luminous, and dazzlingly
beautiful images the fellow made.
I liked the flowers, windmills, the
repeated images of the tower-like building, the women model looking upwards, the haystacks,
the river landscapes, the night sky portrait with a smiling E.T. looking
at the observer, the stunning use of colors, both naturalistic, and abstract, as much, or more than
the abstract black and white grids,
filled in by the primary colors, for which he's mostly famous. This stuff wasn't in my Arthur Jansen art history book for some reason.
What an inspired painter Mondrian was. Long live Piet, Vincent, Rembrandt, the dude who painted
The Goldfinch, and the other Dutch masters who made such superb art work! I see a red ember glowing in the dark. Those dudes
are better than cheap cigars!
so inspiring on my artist journey - thank you for collating
Fantastiskt att få se hur mångsidig och intressant hans konst (var) är! Tack 🎨🖼
So beautiful are these paintings!
Огромное благодарение за прекрасный ролик.Любовь и ☮️ Мир ВСЕМ !
I didn't know Mondrian's landscape paintings are so good.Thanks.
You are doing exquisite and quiet stunning work with this collection and many, many others. Bravo! Very well done, LearnFromMasters. We are students before you. DMSwanson .
Still awesome paintings.
Amazing, beautiful, and nostalgic use of color and technique.
Thank you. That was great.
Um artista que aprendi a gostar
Author with guts to draw whatever he wants, and in whatever style he wants.
I dont mean to be off topic but does anyone know of a method to get back into an Instagram account??
I somehow forgot the login password. I would appreciate any assistance you can offer me!
@Liam Christian Instablaster =)
@Axton Payton i really appreciate your reply. I found the site through google and im in the hacking process atm.
Takes quite some time so I will get back to you later with my results.
@Axton Payton It worked and I actually got access to my account again. I am so happy:D
Thanks so much, you saved my ass!
@Liam Christian Happy to help :D
I don’t like how you jump all over from one period and style of his paintings to another.
I wish they would caption titles and years also
Sorry but the work at 10:33 dog's portrait doesn't seems to be from Mondrian, signed "Isar Hablemia", can u explain us ?
The painting seems to be signed bottom right...perhaps the name at the top could be the dogs or the owner of the dog...or a place...Isar being a river...
Pinturas adoravel
Domage que Mondrian ait délaissé la puissante expression picturale de ses premières oeuvres pour la platitude de la peinture abstraite !
What was the music? Great collection. I had no idea he had such depth to his work. Some of those landscapes are enchanting.
Music is by : John Stockton. Slow Drag
Who’s music is this please? It’s very lovely music and it should be mentioned here. But I can’t see any mention of either the composer or the musician.
Art is language...each painter has 'its' code of touch/inflection...for the viewer a silent feeling comes through
Exactly. And that makes each artist at least bi-lingual!
More than the "Composition in Colour"
Aren't we all more than what is seen?
Grande
I can see why. That is why I keep making houses in my paintings.
Great Artist....
Awesome
Fine ill be a mondrian fan
What nature represents is good. Maybe those drawings with a few lines on a white background had nothing to do with it. The musical background is disturbing because there is only one theme that is repeated dozens of times
@Isabela Nica........turn off the music, slow the video down to x .5 speed, get a glass of wine and watch the paintings in silence. As if in an art gallery. That should take care of it.
Very interesting artist. As of late, Is his sguares as mathatical algorithms, patterns even in realist work speculations on the metaphysics off moments?!
My mentor , William Stanley Hayter claimed as a scientist, / Artist leaning toward surrealist views. That the human perception of space , volume is based on our mind configurations of our perceptions reality. Not what matter is. As in Religion, the need for configurations of the hereafter. Not that within matter , is the all powerful. As a moving force. Like the melucar cells in our bodies are in constant movements . Mondrian try to abstractly dive up space and color, aside his realism studies. Lights , color , reflections. Interesting the need to set thing down to concrete perception, when it's really a mind illution. Leonardo da Vinci sensed just that. Artist have always been on a Holy Grail as to the why's.🎨👀⚡⏳🇺🇸🇩🇰
Bello
Just realized we share the same birth day i hope im him reincarnated lol
I have just been educated.
Quantum entanglement and string theory
great ! but the music repetitions are unbearable , not for musical people...
Early on works show talent, but the latter stuff was just a con pandering to the criminals that took over the art market.
Yeah, I don't get that colored squares stuff. It's boring. Look at it for five seconds, got it, never have to look again. Is it us... is there something wrong with us?
@@nelsonx5326 Into the twentieth century, its just with technology the globalist mafia families (developing their Central Bank strategy - eventually devolving into the current petro-dollar debt slave system) were able with film and TV, to not only solidify their control over those propaganda outlets, but with the telephone, gave them immediate connectivity to each other in a way never possible before.
Actual talent being the utmost criteria for recognition at the highest levels hung on until about 1950 - the last really honored workmanship after Art Nouveau style being Art Deco. There are still mind-blowingly good painters, but they are not recognized at the very top levels - meaning they are not given one man shows at MOMA or The Met and are not touted as the best artists of our age at the Biennales, etc, etc, (and as far as sculpture, forget about it - there may be a handful who can reproduce the genius of what we see in the Louvre - but what gets promoted as genius now in sculpture a pipe-welding plumber can do aluminum boxes and boards leaned up against the wall - and 99% of human likeness sculpture if you haven't noticed are completely wooden crappy mannequins) - instead the most absurd, ridiculously simple crap a child, if not a monkey could paint is touted. There is a very good reason for that and goes back to the globalist mafia criminal families.
The reason is that what is more important now in art is the propaganda power of the person chosen to be the "art darling" or the "best artist of our time" - The globalist mafia families/Central Bankster criminals who with their trillions made from drug/child/weapons trafficking (playing both sides of wars and conflicts) have absolutely bought up 100% all the fine art world at the highest and most prestigious levels. And to insure their continued perpetuity, of course just like royals of old did - EXCEPT with one in a million talent being the royals of old's criteria - no, instead, these twentieth century "royals - read criminal oligarchs" find it not only easier but much more effective and easy to find a beautiful-faced gay man or lesbian who arranges garbage on the floor or makes angry neon signage to echo their propaganda without question - it's harder to find actually one in a million genius artists that you can control 100% - no, what they want are perfectly empty vessels with no moral qualms to be simple spokespersons for whatever new perversion and abomination they want to have promoted "through art" - and oh such glorious, subtle and in synch with the times art - at least what their equally paid-off toady critics will say - and of course the equally paid-off toady curators showcase the pile of garbage like its Michelangelo's Pieta - and the greedy collectors already knowing that the garbage, just like worthless paper money, has officially stamped upon it a million dollars by the former groups simply by their advocacy and promotion of it, brainwash all the billions of the masses into believing it is "special" and worth something - although there are some who realize the game that its only this incestuous world of art criminals hyping and inflating their own crap to make money off it, and can make a lot of money quickly since the crap is easy and quick to make - unlike some hyper realist large canvas or sculpture that would take years and require a real artist that might not be on board with being their propaganda spokesperson (and forfend! might actually be ideologically opposed to them!!!! -- can't have that threat !!!)
So, in short, the squares are easy to make - a competent middle schooler who is somewhat neat with paint and patient could make one in a day - the thing to remember is that there a lot of people in this world in the top 5% of wealth, and perhaps power, who all want in on making a lot more money (as well as impressing their friends ) and they don't care if its simple squares on a canvas or lavender circles on their ass, as long as its got that million dollar rubber stamp of authenticity by the art world criminals. But at bottom what is really going on is the power and influence of the ones who are made into the "art geniuses" of our time despite the garbage they produce, because its an information war now and what those people say and their ideological belief, whether real or feigned, carries a lot of weight and influences people - you certainly can't afford promoting the wrong person up the ladder and have them liking Trump!
The art market completely rejected his De Stijl movement lol, you have it completely backwards
@@apes4days254 no, I have it perfectly figured out
@@turquoise770 well one of your criticisms is based on a fallacy, so no, you don't have it figured out.
Понятия не имел, что Мондриан был такой тонкий пейзажист. Но стал он всемирно знаменит не благодаря своим замечательным пейзажам, а своему дебильному "абстракционизму". Для того чтобы стать знаменитым в ХХ веке с хорошей живописью надо было распрощаться.
GOSTARIA SABER SOBRE ESSE ARTISTA NAO SEI NADA
@@lourdesbonfim4346 An interesting artist to study and the Baughouse designers.
Did he use drugs?
Don't care about his squares and rectangles, I don't get it.
Did anybody else see ET at 10.22 ?
Anybody could paint these with crayons and a ruler! How is this “master” work?
I see God in most of his paintings...
Très varié mais pas tellement intéressant....
This certainly proves Mondrian was a poor painter.
My younger brother not, but my oldest siter, absolutely.
Exactly :-) Gonn geta me some paint a.s.a.p.
I prefer Musee d'Orsay, impressionism is a good starter
Karl Georges Who are you to deny his skill ?
just because you don't like his style or work, don't put it down.