Jared, you speak wonderfully, and I enjoy listening to many of the things you say. This was awesome poetry. Please forgive my nievete; please explain this to me as though I'm a 5th grader... Thank you Sir. 😅😂🤣👍
Thanks, Jared. I do have a question. At the beginning you say that the magistrates must obey their master (God) and those who do not are unfit to be magistrates. In Rom. 13 though, Paul doesn't seem to only be referring to 'obedient to God' magistrates specifically, but to really all who hold the position (obedient and even disobedient). My point being that the focus in Rom. 13 isn't on whether these magistrates are born-again obedient magistrates, but that ALL magistrates are there by the will and hand of God and ought to be somehow honored and respected (at least to some degree). I don't think means allowing the Hitlers and sado-mascistic rulers to run amuck. But if you narrow the definition down to only magistrates who are '''born again obedient' (is there another definition of obedient you mean?) then it seems to be overreading something in the text. Curious your thoughts here though and thanks for sharing👍
7:10 I haven't heard hardly any credobaptists say the Abrahamic covenant was not a covenant of grace. Rather, that is often said of the Mosaic covenant by baptists. Thanks for your content, Jared.
@@ProclaimingtheLight That’s unfortunate. There’s a lot of truth in what theocast presents. They are not the only ones I hear raising concerns either. You can still affect the culture while maintaining a clearer law gospel distinction.
I love the theocast guys. My pastor is close with their pastor but they missed it and your reference to the "law Gospel distinction proves it." General Equity Theonomy is the outworking of the Gospel in society. When 70 percent of people love Jesus they ask "How can we obey Jesus in our politics?" That's the point.
Also, anyone who ever listened to ANY G.E.T. guys preach the Gospel wouldn't even know we were general equity theonomists bc there is such a clear distinction.
@@ProclaimingtheLight I’m not sure I see the value in reaction videos to heathens behavior for example. Other than entertainment of course. I also think only about 3% - 10% of christians understanding the theology correctly (including the gospel) is a fairly serious issue particularly when you’re trying to change a democracy. We can go back and forth but at the end of the day I guess it makes for entertaining content but is that want we need?
I’m a Baptist and ready to boogie!!
I'm a Baptist and I don't dance to that tune.
@@recalltolife3478 Baptists shouldn't be dancing to any tune ;-)
Jared, you speak wonderfully, and I enjoy listening to many of the things you say. This was awesome poetry. Please forgive my nievete; please explain this to me as though I'm a 5th grader... Thank you Sir. 😅😂🤣👍
I'm a Baptist n I am a Mere Christendom breakdancer. #DatPostmill
I’m a Baptist, but I only want a sanctified Fox-Trot. 😉
Thanks, Jared. I do have a question. At the beginning you say that the magistrates must obey their master (God) and those who do not are unfit to be magistrates. In Rom. 13 though, Paul doesn't seem to only be referring to 'obedient to God' magistrates specifically, but to really all who hold the position (obedient and even disobedient). My point being that the focus in Rom. 13 isn't on whether these magistrates are born-again obedient magistrates, but that ALL magistrates are there by the will and hand of God and ought to be somehow honored and respected (at least to some degree). I don't think means allowing the Hitlers and sado-mascistic rulers to run amuck. But if you narrow the definition down to only magistrates who are '''born again obedient' (is there another definition of obedient you mean?) then it seems to be overreading something in the text. Curious your thoughts here though and thanks for sharing👍
I’m a baptist and never thought I wasn’t in. #Datpostmil even Assemblies of God are part of God’s creation.
This was helpful.
7:10 I haven't heard hardly any credobaptists say the Abrahamic covenant was not a covenant of grace. Rather, that is often said of the Mosaic covenant by baptists. Thanks for your content, Jared.
Anyone seen the theocast episodes on theonomy on youtube? Pretty good stuff.
I did. They missed the point. Apologia tries to correct them.
@@ProclaimingtheLight That’s unfortunate. There’s a lot of truth in what theocast presents. They are not the only ones I hear raising concerns either. You can still affect the culture while maintaining a clearer law gospel distinction.
I love the theocast guys. My pastor is close with their pastor but they missed it and your reference to the "law Gospel distinction proves it." General Equity Theonomy is the outworking of the Gospel in society. When 70 percent of people love Jesus they ask "How can we obey Jesus in our politics?" That's the point.
Also, anyone who ever listened to ANY G.E.T. guys preach the Gospel wouldn't even know we were general equity theonomists bc there is such a clear distinction.
@@ProclaimingtheLight I’m not sure I see the value in reaction videos to heathens behavior for example. Other than entertainment of course. I also think only about 3% - 10% of christians understanding the theology correctly (including the gospel) is a fairly serious issue particularly when you’re trying to change a democracy. We can go back and forth but at the end of the day I guess it makes for entertaining content but is that want we need?
Why do you even need the Baptists? Haven't you all invited the Catholics to shake a leg in this Danse Macabre? Just wondering.
Braptist
Need might be too strong of a word. It would be nice however for all of the brethren including Baptists to be a part of a renewed Christendom.
@@mkshffr4936 I can't help but think that the Baptists will be allotted the lower seats at the table in the "renewed Christendom."