Exclusive interview with Jermaine Jenas as he finds out he’s been sacked by BBC |

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,7 тис.

  • @andywilson8524
    @andywilson8524 2 місяці тому +951

    So today we learnt there are two sides to a story but he can’t talk about it. saved you all 8 minutes of your life, thank me later

  • @stephenholmes1036
    @stephenholmes1036 2 місяці тому +46

    When Mr Jenas said it is in the hands of his solicitors. The journalist should have politely ended the interview

  • @Travis_22
    @Travis_22 2 місяці тому +568

    Pity they didn't sack Jimmy Savile 60 years ago

    • @justinstocks5040
      @justinstocks5040 2 місяці тому +19

      Now then! Now then!

    • @TotalFreakUK
      @TotalFreakUK 2 місяці тому +6

      @@justinstocks5040 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @watts18269
      @watts18269 2 місяці тому

      They were all his good friends who helped cover it up whilst using him as the scapegoat to hide the fact they were all doing it too. The bbc and government is absolutely hoaching with savilles.

    • @Ridiculousman3
      @Ridiculousman3 2 місяці тому

      Starmer was the one that signed off that there wasn't enough evidence to convict him. And now he's running the country

    • @missmusiq6150
      @missmusiq6150 2 місяці тому +8

      Exactly

  • @CorridorJ
    @CorridorJ 2 місяці тому +12

    Guys I got a sneaky suspicion that he can’t talk about it and that he is going to talk to his lawyers about the situation and that he isn’t happy about it and he is going to leave it in the hands of the lawyers and there is definitely two sides to the story…and listen to his lawyers.

    • @mal_752
      @mal_752 2 місяці тому +1

      @@CorridorJ 🤦🏿‍♂️🤦🏿‍♂️🤦🏿‍♂️🤦🏿‍♂️😂😂😂😂

  • @Kiinell
    @Kiinell 2 місяці тому +536

    It's not an interview if he didn't answer even one question. What a waste of time.

    • @nobbytart27
      @nobbytart27 2 місяці тому +14

      Totally agree, its like watching a crime program, with someone charged in a cell repeatadly saying "no comment" why did he even bother to do this interview

    • @Jon-hb6gx
      @Jon-hb6gx 2 місяці тому +7

      Yep, worst exclusive of all time.

    • @KINGKING10109
      @KINGKING10109 2 місяці тому +3

      Legal proceedings tho mate.
      He can’t say anything yet

    • @greg434
      @greg434 2 місяці тому +3

      It's an interview - not a police interigation...

    • @barryj388
      @barryj388 2 місяці тому +1

      ​@@KINGKING10109 He could have said "it's not true" in response to whether he sent "unsolicited texts" and denied any wrong doing. He didn't do that.

  • @dazza9448
    @dazza9448 2 місяці тому +9

    I quite liked the part where he said he “cant talk about it”
    What exhilarating stuff !!

  • @RobbieB2606
    @RobbieB2606 2 місяці тому +300

    I don't think he can talk about it. Aside from the fact he wasn't able to answer any questions, what a worthwhile interview 🙄

    • @TheAntsNest
      @TheAntsNest 2 місяці тому +5

      Still, at least he can leave it with the lawyers tho 😂

    • @PeakDennisReynolds
      @PeakDennisReynolds 2 місяці тому +1

      He's got nothing to worry about. He'll find a assistant coach job or one of those other total bull positions for a club that earn a ridiculous amount of money for telling grown men how to kick a football when they already are doing it professionally, and his wife won't leave him despite him being a pig to her because of the £. Even Adam's Johnsons wife stayed with him lol.

    • @DaveJohns-c3f
      @DaveJohns-c3f 2 місяці тому

      Always new he was a racist wrongun.
      As a man of god I can almost see the evil sizzling out of certain people.

  • @rabc9292
    @rabc9292 2 місяці тому +27

    Maybe the worst interview I’ve ever seen

    • @Gehri_soch2.0
      @Gehri_soch2.0 2 місяці тому +1

      Worse than Prince Andrew?

    • @rabc9292
      @rabc9292 2 місяці тому

      Context being an interviewers job is to get as much as possible out the interviewee

    • @zeeone4492
      @zeeone4492 2 місяці тому

      ​@@Gehri_soch2.0Don't sweat it

  • @comradeozzbug
    @comradeozzbug 2 місяці тому +160

    Ironic the title of this video is called an “exclusive interview”. They could have interviewed a cardboard cutout of Jenas and got the same interview 😂

    • @stephenholmes1036
      @stephenholmes1036 2 місяці тому +2

      He couldn't say anything in all honesty

    • @dingopisscreek
      @dingopisscreek 2 місяці тому +1

      Dibble could have interviewed me about it - you would have learned as much as you did from this.

    • @user-zr6ee6lb9m
      @user-zr6ee6lb9m 2 місяці тому +3

      The same could be said of his punditry. You'd not notice the difference

    • @TheAntsNest
      @TheAntsNest 2 місяці тому

      ​@@user-zr6ee6lb9mhis punditry was fine stop whining like an infant 😂🤣

    • @michaelhickland4450
      @michaelhickland4450 2 місяці тому +1

      thats because there are legal proceedings ongoing so he can't comment

  • @seaniek9175
    @seaniek9175 2 місяці тому +274

    Jermaine is as insightful in this interview as his football punditry.

  • @pipmoore2006
    @pipmoore2006 2 місяці тому +8

    I know Jermaine Jenas isn’t the first to be sacked for “Inappropriate Behavior”, but by god the BBC were quick to pull the plug, shame they didn’t do the same for all the corrupt people from the past.

    • @iangascoigne8231
      @iangascoigne8231 2 місяці тому

      @@pipmoore2006 They pulled the plug on Jason Mansford pretty quickly. So what are you saying, he shouldn’t have been given the bullet because they hadn’t dealt with people in the past?

  • @Megaman2DK
    @Megaman2DK 2 місяці тому +263

    Karen from the BBC HR Department sacked Jenas on the spot but decided to only Suspend Hew Edwards on full pay. ICANT

    • @ceel7068
      @ceel7068 2 місяці тому +2

      😮😮😮

    • @karensimpson4869
      @karensimpson4869 2 місяці тому +9

      Don’t make sense does it

    • @toph8298
      @toph8298 2 місяці тому +25

      Jenas was apparently hired as a contractor while Edwards was a BBC employee. Easy to fire one and a nightmare to dismiss the other.

    • @jamesb821
      @jamesb821 2 місяці тому +4

      Well when you put it like that….you certainly have a point

    • @Charlie3vans
      @Charlie3vans 2 місяці тому +6

      Plus a £40k pay rise.

  • @connoisseurm103
    @connoisseurm103 2 місяці тому +12

    Cutting edge journalism at its finest! 🙄

  • @PaulThorpeOfficial
    @PaulThorpeOfficial 2 місяці тому +173

    I trust the BBC like I'd trust a hungry fox around a chicken shed and Times Radio aren't a lot different.

    • @EncoreASMR
      @EncoreASMR 2 місяці тому +10

      Nice to see you here

    • @plackerfigurecollector
      @plackerfigurecollector 2 місяці тому

      I wudnt trust him or the bbc as far as I cud throw him

    • @markcarson8
      @markcarson8 2 місяці тому +6

      Totally agree

    • @plackerfigurecollector
      @plackerfigurecollector 2 місяці тому +3

      @@PaulThorpeOfficial nice to see my comments arnt getting thru again

    • @MrKeefy1967
      @MrKeefy1967 2 місяці тому +2

      Good for you. Thanks for your contribution - it's been enlightening.

  • @SensibleMoniker
    @SensibleMoniker 2 місяці тому +22

    He was a diversity hire given his lack of quality so he won't be a loss

    • @mal_752
      @mal_752 2 місяці тому

      😂😂😂🤦🏿‍♂️🤦🏿‍♂️🤦🏿‍♂️🤦🏿‍♂️

    • @zeeone4492
      @zeeone4492 2 місяці тому

      He's certainly no Jimmy Savile

  • @nickfisher427
    @nickfisher427 2 місяці тому +274

    Surely being inappropriate is required for a BBC position!

    • @acptelford1307
      @acptelford1307 2 місяці тому +4

      Was Philip Schofield on the BBC then?

    • @cancon88
      @cancon88 2 місяці тому +2

      Quite right

    • @dylanwestren
      @dylanwestren 2 місяці тому +1

      😂 👏

    • @harrysmith8090
      @harrysmith8090 2 місяці тому +4

      @@acptelford1307think he was too overqualified for the job

    • @johnwalsh128
      @johnwalsh128 2 місяці тому

      Wasn't he on the BBC when he shoved his hand up that gophers arse?​@@acptelford1307

  • @md-ps2hx
    @md-ps2hx 2 місяці тому +5

    "What part of I can't talk about it do you not understand??" is what Jenas should have said!

  • @samdavidson8918
    @samdavidson8918 2 місяці тому +63

    I think he’s going to speak to his lawyers..

    • @ceel7068
      @ceel7068 2 місяці тому +5

      He has no other choice but to speak to his lawyer. I'm not surprised. This is how they treat "some people," while others are allowed to do whatever they want, break the rules 1 billion times, and notify one g. I pray that whatever is in the dark will come to light. In the end, the truth will be known!!

    • @HdHd-hp6qz
      @HdHd-hp6qz 2 місяці тому +3

      If the bbc have sacked him on the spot they’ve seen the text messages that he has sent. And now it’s down to his legal team to mitigate and cast doubt against the allegations. His career is well and truly over regardless.

    • @archietheanarchist
      @archietheanarchist 2 місяці тому +3

      that's pure speculation on your part. I have no idea where you people get these ideas from!

    • @brimkathstampex2306
      @brimkathstampex2306 2 місяці тому

      @@HdHd-hp6qz Thank goodness.

    • @brimkathstampex2306
      @brimkathstampex2306 2 місяці тому

      Does he know how to speak, or will he have to consult his lawyers first?

  • @flames1441
    @flames1441 2 місяці тому +6

    Jermaine Jenas, Noel Clarke… these dons will never learn

  • @paulweller3179
    @paulweller3179 2 місяці тому +3

    Pull the race card Jermaine,you'll soon get your job back.

  • @allanashton5187
    @allanashton5187 2 місяці тому +69

    I don’t think Jenas can talk about it.

    • @toph8298
      @toph8298 2 місяці тому +10

      Apparently it’s now in the hands of his lawyers.

    • @fuckthis81
      @fuckthis81 2 місяці тому

      It's very hard to tell 😂😂

    • @Trail717
      @Trail717 2 місяці тому +7

      ⁠@@toph8298he’s not happy, you can tell by his reaction.

    • @paddyconn3344
      @paddyconn3344 2 місяці тому +5

      There’s two sides.

    • @paddyconn3344
      @paddyconn3344 2 місяці тому +4

      Like in a football game there are two sides or two teams

  • @tomite2001
    @tomite2001 2 місяці тому +4

    The most dangerous place to work is a corporate office.

  • @toph8298
    @toph8298 2 місяці тому +44

    I’m getting the impression that he can’t talk about it and is leaving it in the hands of his lawyers.

    • @MarkPearce-u7m
      @MarkPearce-u7m 2 місяці тому +1

      I think you may well have a point there. 😂

    • @Charlie3vans
      @Charlie3vans 2 місяці тому +2

      Well deduced Homes, I hadn't thought of that, but now you mention it I think you're on to something 😂😂😂

    • @toph8298
      @toph8298 2 місяці тому +1

      @@Charlie3vans Elementary, Watson!

    • @african-history-fountain
      @african-history-fountain 2 місяці тому

      How insightful.

    • @toph8298
      @toph8298 2 місяці тому

      @@african-history-fountain Thank you, sir.

  • @jziffi
    @jziffi 2 місяці тому +4

    What was the point of doing this interview?

  • @missmusiq6150
    @missmusiq6150 2 місяці тому +108

    But the BBC kept Jimmy Savile going for decades 😮

    • @lescorlett4133
      @lescorlett4133 2 місяці тому +2

      Because he had enough dirt on them and the Royal family.

    • @neesense258
      @neesense258 2 місяці тому +5

      They keep their secrets - m8’s protecting m8’s

    • @MarcoSpeaksNadsat
      @MarcoSpeaksNadsat 2 місяці тому +4

      So you would rather they kept doing the same?

    • @stephengoddard5093
      @stephengoddard5093 2 місяці тому

      Exactly.. hypocrisy at its best isn't it?

    • @brain8484
      @brain8484 2 місяці тому

      what has that got to do with this ?

  • @afc1589
    @afc1589 2 місяці тому +2

    So glad. I never liked him on MOD or the One Show. at least the BBC acted, trying to gain some credibility back with all the scandal that goes on there..

  • @Danko31
    @Danko31 2 місяці тому +121

    Why on earth has he agreed to an interview on the same day he's been sacked, if he can't answer a single question.

    • @tttt4029
      @tttt4029 2 місяці тому +4

      Didn't they say he was working for them so was in the building ?

    • @HdHd-hp6qz
      @HdHd-hp6qz 2 місяці тому +3

      Because he works for them so can’t refuse to attended the meeting but can say no comment.

    • @SJ-dm3eb
      @SJ-dm3eb 2 місяці тому

      Because he's an idiot.

    • @bbdi548
      @bbdi548 2 місяці тому +2

      @@HdHd-hp6qzbut hes been sacked. So he no longer worked for them at the time of the interview

    • @conor9436
      @conor9436 2 місяці тому

      @@bbdi548 He works for TalkSport (as well as BBC). He was in the TalkSport studio broadcasting and was then interviewed for TalkSport news.

  • @planethoth1238
    @planethoth1238 2 місяці тому +1

    His wife is a very weak woman as she kicked him out rather than confronting the problem head on. Jermaine Jenas is obviously remorseful about what he did and he even said he is getting help, so rather than supporting her husband she chooses to kick him out and rage about it. Are those the characteristics of a loving and supporting wife, no, these are the characteristics of a weak, childish and immature little girl.

  • @carolinewaterstone2624
    @carolinewaterstone2624 2 місяці тому +77

    What on Earth was the point of this meeting?! He was not going to answer a single question, no matter how hard you tried! 😫

    • @Jon-hb6gx
      @Jon-hb6gx 2 місяці тому +7

      It wasn't a meeting, he was already on air. I agree though, that was painfully boring.

    • @Benaam007-z5s
      @Benaam007-z5s 2 місяці тому

      The interviewer just stretched it

    • @zeeone4492
      @zeeone4492 2 місяці тому

      Just like his football punditry

  • @bobbugwithoneeyeskingiskin8974
    @bobbugwithoneeyeskingiskin8974 2 місяці тому +5

    He identified as a footballer, but that broke his contract as it wasn’t true!

  • @DdotRay86
    @DdotRay86 2 місяці тому +22

    This isnt an interview. It's you asking questions to a brick wall.

  • @NomadSupreme911
    @NomadSupreme911 2 місяці тому +1

    From a nation that once ruled the Earth to a nation that destroys it's men for flirting🤣

    • @corkion
      @corkion 2 місяці тому

      Have he not got a wife .he is only a plonker

  • @prash_t
    @prash_t 2 місяці тому +19

    He can't talk about that. That's 8 minutes that I will never get back

  • @Mythic1875
    @Mythic1875 2 місяці тому +3

    If the tv career is over then politics is his thing, never answered a bloody question. Save yourselves 8mins.

  • @dmgsoultogetherness6667
    @dmgsoultogetherness6667 2 місяці тому +28

    no point in asking him

  • @veedubgeezer
    @veedubgeezer 2 місяці тому +3

    There's three sides to every story. There's one side, there's the other side and there's the truth.

    • @G4MER28
      @G4MER28 2 місяці тому +2

      we cant really talk about it

  • @MrDingDongPong
    @MrDingDongPong 2 місяці тому +56

    Jermaine "i cant talk about it" Jenas

  • @npj943
    @npj943 2 місяці тому +1

    What is the point of this?

  • @beausexon7546
    @beausexon7546 2 місяці тому +16

    The very strong rumor from my friend at the bbc is he was having an affair with a crew member who reported him when they split up.

    • @thealchemist7871
      @thealchemist7871 2 місяці тому +9

      Well that sounds like a bitter woman

    • @CountMackula
      @CountMackula 2 місяці тому +2

      Can't be sacked for that surely

    • @GregOrCreg
      @GregOrCreg 2 місяці тому

      I hope that's what it was. No doubt we'll be accused of 'misogyny' for believing that, but what ever happened to 'Black Lives Matter'? Is that all yesterday's news? Only #MeToo matters for now? Maybe the non-racists among us could give a Black guy a chance to defend himself.

    • @GregOrCreg
      @GregOrCreg 2 місяці тому +2

      @@CountMackula Not for that, no. But it depends upon the allegation made against him.

    • @gilliangroundsell665
      @gilliangroundsell665 2 місяці тому +7

      Anybody can say anything they want about somebody else. Its the way things are nowdays

  • @SimonPutney
    @SimonPutney 2 місяці тому +5

    He should of been sacked ages ago when he said infamous bombers in ww2
    What he said was a disgrace to this country and the people who fought for this country defend the BBC they were heroes

    • @mal_752
      @mal_752 2 місяці тому

      😂😂😂😂🤦🏿‍♂️🤦🏿‍♂️🤦🏿‍♂️🤦🏿‍♂️🐂🐂🐂🐂

    • @Del_bb
      @Del_bb 2 місяці тому

      The people who his country . Are we talking great Britain aka. Colonist 😂😂😂😂

    • @Gamer-do7qv
      @Gamer-do7qv 2 місяці тому

      @Del_bb cry 😢 😢

  • @stefangrant1989
    @stefangrant1989 2 місяці тому +24

    Full credit for trying to get a statement from Jermaine but it’s clear he can’t talk about, which he repeated as an answer to each question……

    • @richard_1111
      @richard_1111 2 місяці тому +4

      Became ridiculous after the 3rd

    • @brimkathstampex2306
      @brimkathstampex2306 2 місяці тому

      It's clear he can't even talk.

    • @stephenholmes1036
      @stephenholmes1036 2 місяці тому +1

      Correct , He will have been instructed to say nothing. After the 3rd question the journalist should have said, Mr Jenas can you comment on anything concerning this matter?
      Response No.
      Ok thank you Mr Jenas for talking to me.

  • @elainehernen286
    @elainehernen286 2 місяці тому +2

    What exactly is the point of this hasn’t denied anything 😮

  • @Oddmen1
    @Oddmen1 2 місяці тому +16

    Why did agree to an interview and say absolutely nothing?

    • @hoto31
      @hoto31 2 місяці тому

      he never agreed but interviewers asked him

  • @johncollins5178
    @johncollins5178 2 місяці тому +1

    "NO COMMENT! NO COMMENT! NO COMMENT!" That has to be THE 'interview' of the century!!!"🙄🤣🤣🤣

  • @ainsbrittain8954
    @ainsbrittain8954 2 місяці тому +28

    Clearly GARY LINEKER is UNTOUCHABLE, As he should have sacked himself A LONG TIME AGO

    • @Random-xw1fg
      @Random-xw1fg 2 місяці тому +1

      Why?

    • @G4MER28
      @G4MER28 2 місяці тому +4

      we cant really talk about that

    • @iangascoigne8231
      @iangascoigne8231 2 місяці тому +1

      Why? Has Lineker ever acted inappropriately towards colleagues? Or is it that he speaks the truth and says things you don’t like? Though you forgot the exclamation marks and emojis to go with the capitals.

    • @bradr7607
      @bradr7607 2 місяці тому

      🤡

    • @andrewburman9469
      @andrewburman9469 2 місяці тому

      This has got old very quickly.
      He now says he let his family down. So when he says he,s not happy it would seem that he,s not happy he,s been called out.
      Step.1 Indignation
      Step. 2 speak to my lawyers.
      Step 3 I am so ashamed.
      Step 4 Probably get involved in helping people understand how not to do what he,s done.
      Step.4 Back on the BBC.

  • @cgj3888
    @cgj3888 2 місяці тому +1

    Good to hear the sacking has taken place - he should never have been allowed to join the BBC with his record

  • @ChrisVaughan-gj7ve
    @ChrisVaughan-gj7ve 2 місяці тому +45

    Oh no they didn’t find out he used to play for Tottenham?

  • @SISU889
    @SISU889 2 місяці тому +1

    Mmm.... Shame they weren't as assertive with Mr Edwards ! Which we all know was more henious crime !

  • @bishyeahbish3758
    @bishyeahbish3758 2 місяці тому +19

    To be fair, he is a bit of a muppet. I went out for dinner with my group of friends one of which used to play football with jermaine and both groups joined for dinner. He was very keen to tell anyone who'd listen how much money he was making/is making/and will be making in the future, he talked about his cars his holidays (his Everything basically), his favourite topic is himself and he really loves to go on aaaaand oooooon about himself. He offered to pay for dinner but then made a point of telling all the ladies one by one that it was him who hadpaid for dinner, it was clear to see he needed everyone to know that it was him who'd paid but kept saying it was "no big deal" so much so that we started joking that it obviously WAS a big deal if he'd gone round the whole group one at a time to tell us all "yeah don't worry about dinner I've taken care of it" and then stand there waiting for his thankyou's. What an absolute dingledoosher. Such a bragger, he talked about nothing but himself telling people things about himself that nobody had asked before moving on to another story about himself or something he owned. He was/is just boring tbh, repetitive and plain old boring😴. So I'm really not bothered to see him getting fired I honestly don't think much of him at all, hopefully it'll humble him the way he needs to be humbled. Not gonna wish him luck because I'd be lying....I couldn't care less either way tbh its just an idiot I met once

    • @WilliamFoley-d3y
      @WilliamFoley-d3y 2 місяці тому +2

      Take a look at my comments, they start with " The big question is how on earth did this muppet average footballer etc...... you were lucky it was only one night, I've heard from a few ex players that he's a egotistical braggard, so enjoyed you're comments

    • @preciousjewels2468
      @preciousjewels2468 2 місяці тому +2

      You really talk too much 😂

    • @julielumala3645
      @julielumala3645 2 місяці тому +3

      Jealousy

    • @G4MER28
      @G4MER28 2 місяці тому

      @@preciousjewels2468 unlike Jermaine, he CAN talk about it.

    • @russky68
      @russky68 2 місяці тому

      Bobby Robson has his number…
      Great hospital career though 👍🏻

  • @jono_young
    @jono_young 2 місяці тому +1

    He’s not happy, he can’t talk about it, he’s doing lots of talking to his lawyers.
    Best exclusive interview EVER 😂

  • @troggmeister
    @troggmeister 2 місяці тому +29

    So if he is found innocent and he is given a huge payout after claiming unfair dismissal , who pays ? . Us the licence fee payers i presume !

    • @eddiel7635
      @eddiel7635 2 місяці тому +2

      correct

    • @JohnJohn-cu7nk
      @JohnJohn-cu7nk 2 місяці тому

      MORE THE mug you !.
      I have never paid for it in over 30 years as an adult.

    • @eddiel7635
      @eddiel7635 2 місяці тому

      @@JohnJohn-cu7nk adult in the loosest sense of the word

    • @HdHd-hp6qz
      @HdHd-hp6qz 2 місяці тому +1

      Impossible. The bbc would have only sacked him if the evidence was clear. What can happen is he can negotiate an involuntary resignation. So he resigns on his own accord with full pay and nothing to answer for. That’s his very best option. If an adjudication finds him guilty of sexual harassment then he is then looking at criminal charges sex offenders register etc.

    • @BadAppleBlues
      @BadAppleBlues 2 місяці тому +3

      If he is found innocent then the woman who made the allegations against him should be sacked, prosecuted and have to pay Jenas vast amounts of compo.

  • @angysamuel7615
    @angysamuel7615 2 місяці тому +1

    No matter what, he shouldn't be sacked on air. Bbc choices who to suspend and who to sacked on the spot. Equality!!

  • @ianharley1726
    @ianharley1726 2 місяці тому +9

    I'm absolutely shocked...... that he was paid £200,000 just for MOTD! evidentally 'the one show' is a private entity so his salary for that is a secret, yet it's aired on the publicly funded BBC. This organisation needs to be broken up!

    • @johnkeilloh2682
      @johnkeilloh2682 2 місяці тому

      You make zero sense, BBC shows lots of programs they don’t make. Every US show for instance. The one show is produced by a private company, and the bbc buys the show. What’s difficult to understand? MoTD is produced by the bbc itself so that’s why they said what they’d paid him.

    • @mrpenguin815
      @mrpenguin815 2 місяці тому

      ​@@johnkeilloh2682 It's filmed in the BBC HQ and produced by BBC Studios Limited which is wholly owned by the BBC. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck then it probably is made by the BBC.

    • @johnkeilloh2682
      @johnkeilloh2682 2 місяці тому

      @@mrpenguin815 it’s not how it works though regardless of how you want it to be, the company that makes that show is registered as a private company that does not receive public funding directly, therefore it’s not a public company. It’s created to keep your licence fee down by selling television worldwide

    • @albertreynolds9287
      @albertreynolds9287 2 місяці тому

      I agree the BBC should be disbanded shut the BBC down

    • @albertreynolds9287
      @albertreynolds9287 2 місяці тому +1

      He's not so smarmy now

  • @carlatkins9096
    @carlatkins9096 2 місяці тому +1

    One final question, "is there any point in this interview"?😂

    • @Johnboy14z
      @Johnboy14z 2 місяці тому

      I can't talk about it

  • @nottooherbal
    @nottooherbal 2 місяці тому +19

    Interview probably more interesting than the endless brain numbing talking about sport .

  • @xplaybwoix
    @xplaybwoix 2 місяці тому +4

    Two Observations that others already know.
    1) BBC has a consistent track record of hiring people who end up doing extremly messed up stuff. Again and again.
    What is it going to take for the licence fee to stop. When or what will be the final straw on that camel. It is not fit for purpose anymore and should fund itself. Complete abuse of tax payer money.
    2) Jermaine Jenas was not a great presenter. He got lucky.These journalists are treating him like a legend! So what if he is fuming?This guy has no natural talent for any of this. He is extremly forgetable imo. I am tired of tv stations relying on the same face when there are SO SO many unique and superb presenters waiting in the background. Stop giving us ex footballers are presenters or celebrities. Let unknowns be given a chance.

  • @Randomest_Stories
    @Randomest_Stories 2 місяці тому +12

    😂😂😂😂 All the fellow said is "I can't talk about that" to every question! What was the point???

    • @eddiel7635
      @eddiel7635 2 місяці тому +1

      so now we know he can’t talk about it and that there are in facts two sides to this story

    • @G4MER28
      @G4MER28 2 місяці тому +1

      @@eddiel7635 and that it is now in the hands of a team of lawyers

    • @brimkathstampex2306
      @brimkathstampex2306 2 місяці тому +1

      Because he couldn't talk about it.

  • @adamshove6902
    @adamshove6902 2 місяці тому

    Nothing was said, can someone please explain to me what was exclusive

  • @pathogen788
    @pathogen788 2 місяці тому +11

    Waste of time! Why do the interview?? Jenas has always been an incompetent commentator with an arrogant edge in my opinion. That doesn’t influence whether he has or hasn’t done anything wrong but the BBC, his agent and Talk Sport must have some foundation to cut ties.

  • @GoodGuyChucky-666
    @GoodGuyChucky-666 2 місяці тому +2

    He is wasting his time by doing any media interviews by saying he can't talk about it, when it's inevitable that any journalist will ask him what are the factors behind his firing from the BBC, he should have waited until he talked to his lawyers and see where they go from there or wait until the dust settles

    • @JillGalloway-lg7wh
      @JillGalloway-lg7wh 2 місяці тому +1

      Aw never mind he got paid for that very informative interview . Poor wife she’s just found out he’s a 💩

  • @CIMAmotor
    @CIMAmotor 2 місяці тому +13

    Not much of an interview really. Not worth the bother.

  • @casualdav5685
    @casualdav5685 2 місяці тому +3

    Geeza got sacked for putting it on a few birds at work.

    • @paulfitness5157
      @paulfitness5157 2 місяці тому

      Joke it is , women are dangerous in workplaces

  • @SpotlessLeopard
    @SpotlessLeopard 2 місяці тому +19

    People are assuming the texts were somehow of a sexual nature, but what if they were so incredibly boring that the woman's face melted off?

    • @thealchemist7871
      @thealchemist7871 2 місяці тому +4

      😂

    • @SpotlessLeopard
      @SpotlessLeopard 2 місяці тому +3

      @@thealchemist7871 Or even if they were sexual, he went, ooh I'd like to have it off with you.
      Then he just kept saying will you go out with me?
      Then he wrote a 57 point list of demands including only doing it with the lights out, never after 10pm because it's too late at night, he must keep his socks on at all times, and only let's get ready to rumble by ant and dec could be played during the act.

    • @thealchemist7871
      @thealchemist7871 2 місяці тому

      @@SpotlessLeopard apparently he was having an affair with sum1 on set and nw they have reported him

    • @SpotlessLeopard
      @SpotlessLeopard 2 місяці тому +3

      @@thealchemist7871 It's a shame if his careers over.
      He was well on the way to being the new Sandy Toksvig.

    • @andrewbowen6875
      @andrewbowen6875 2 місяці тому +1

      lol that’s pure gold

  • @Bobby.2000
    @Bobby.2000 2 місяці тому +14

    This interview was about as informative as his football punditry

  • @user-lx8vz6oc2b
    @user-lx8vz6oc2b 2 місяці тому +2

    he was a token gesture to get a presenter job. most people have never heard of him and another bbc member thats been caught out again

  • @MiniUsyk
    @MiniUsyk 2 місяці тому +13

    'You're a major bbc star' lawyers just phoned up to deny that.

    • @StuartRead-q5w
      @StuartRead-q5w 2 місяці тому

      😂A major misrepresentation of the truth right there

  • @michaeldoolan7595
    @michaeldoolan7595 2 місяці тому

    Was there any point in this interview?

  • @Chris_13aker
    @Chris_13aker 2 місяці тому +22

    Awful football pundit, although the rest are equally woeful.

    • @RegiyThornton
      @RegiyThornton 2 місяці тому +3

      Can’t remember him saying one thing that was good for a pundit , just an NPC presenter

    • @whitetroutchannel
      @whitetroutchannel 2 місяці тому +2

      i wonder what the viewing figures where for football focus, id wager its the lowest ranked opening show in its history

    • @leanatale7251
      @leanatale7251 2 місяці тому

      You can't trust em

  • @GerGerDaLerLer
    @GerGerDaLerLer 2 місяці тому +1

    My favourite part was the bit he can't talk about and is going to leave to his lawyers

  • @dawnmancaloriankeebals4262
    @dawnmancaloriankeebals4262 2 місяці тому +7

    Well, that's 8 minutes of our lives wasted!

    • @ivorsmith3999
      @ivorsmith3999 2 місяці тому

      Not mine. I switched off after 4 :-)

  • @edwinoseruvwoja9268
    @edwinoseruvwoja9268 2 місяці тому +1

    What on earth would lawyers do if everything was easy to understand ?? 🤔

  • @britrhodesia09
    @britrhodesia09 2 місяці тому +6

    Surely the licence fee payers have a right to know the reason it’s not a private company.

    • @stephenholmes1036
      @stephenholmes1036 2 місяці тому +2

      If it could be contested in court, No they cannot comment for legal reasons

  • @velogoo
    @velogoo 2 місяці тому

    does anyone know if he’s able to talk about it?

  • @burrrrrrrrrrrrrrp
    @burrrrrrrrrrrrrrp 2 місяці тому +4

    Innocent people always say I can’t talk about that 😜

  • @CineRanter
    @CineRanter 2 місяці тому

    Completely unrelated to his sacking, but I have to say he was a really boring, generic pundit

  • @Ntklm
    @Ntklm 2 місяці тому +22

    Silly journalism! Whats the point of all this????? Its just happened how can he possible make comments in this fake news era.

    • @carolelangat-fortune4557
      @carolelangat-fortune4557 2 місяці тому +2

      Exactly!"❤

    • @stephenholmes1036
      @stephenholmes1036 2 місяці тому +1

      He will have been instructed by his solicitors to say nothing.
      After the 3rd question the journalist should have politely ended the interview

  • @debmckoy
    @debmckoy 2 місяці тому +1

    What was the point of this interview?

  • @stuartprice9683
    @stuartprice9683 2 місяці тому +4

    Dont know if hes thought about talking about it but id definitely contact his lawyers if i was him

    • @G4MER28
      @G4MER28 2 місяці тому

      if you was him, you wouldnt be able to talk about it.

  • @adam28xx
    @adam28xx 2 місяці тому

    Why is the questioner constantly asking the same questions when it's clear JJ isn't going to answer any of them?

  • @bardo0007
    @bardo0007 2 місяці тому +5

    Interviewer asking 100 questions, I can't talk about it, I need to talk to my lawyers first

  • @peterbaker3429
    @peterbaker3429 2 місяці тому

    After the recent debacle involving a certain ex News Reader, I'm surprised this clown ever thought he could get away with it.

  • @GrahamJackson-j2s
    @GrahamJackson-j2s 2 місяці тому +7

    They didn't sack Jimmy Saville that quick so god knows what he's done.

    • @spybaz
      @spybaz 2 місяці тому +1

      Jimmy Saville was white...

    • @Manysuchsneed
      @Manysuchsneed 2 місяці тому

      ​​@@spybazalso a lot more connected tbh

    • @vordman
      @vordman 2 місяці тому

      Savile was a monster, but he was highly intelligent too. He put safeguards in place to cover his perversions. Whereas Jenas is just a thick ex-footballer.

  • @uncontrollable343
    @uncontrollable343 2 місяці тому +1

    Wow this investigations moving quickly. Very quickly compared to the Savile case 🤔

  • @coopzi
    @coopzi 2 місяці тому +5

    He can't talk about that right now

  • @samperryman9738
    @samperryman9738 2 місяці тому +1

    Times radio this is earth shattering journalism thanks for the clarity

  • @babyshoe5653
    @babyshoe5653 2 місяці тому +5

    The man who left Newcastle because he didn’t want to live in a goldfish bowl then spends all the time he can on the box, what a thicko!

  • @alfieb6711
    @alfieb6711 2 місяці тому +5

    1:45 That means yes he did

    • @eddiel7635
      @eddiel7635 2 місяці тому

      i’ve sent messages to female colleagues but definitely didn’t get the sack for it

  • @truthhitman7473
    @truthhitman7473 2 місяці тому +1

    Jermaine Jenas sacked but Hew Edwards only suspended ? 😳🤔

    • @G4MER28
      @G4MER28 2 місяці тому

      No, Edwards has been sacked, and will probably do time in prison.

    • @truthhitman7473
      @truthhitman7473 2 місяці тому

      @@G4MER28
      But Edwards was suspended the first time round. They only sacked him recently.

  • @jameshollyoak8230
    @jameshollyoak8230 2 місяці тому +6

    He’s boring , how did he get a job as an interviewer

    • @G4MER28
      @G4MER28 2 місяці тому +2

      he cant talk about that.

    • @brimkathstampex2306
      @brimkathstampex2306 2 місяці тому

      Interviewer?? He could hardly read the autocue! He had to have second autocue to show him where the real autocue was, but even then he failed 9 times out of 10. Who is the BBC plonker who gave him the job in the first place? What were his qualifications?

    • @matthewwilliams3827
      @matthewwilliams3827 2 місяці тому

      @@G4MER28😂😂😂

  • @ColinGarner-h1t
    @ColinGarner-h1t 2 місяці тому +1

    Why ask questions of the guy when clearly he’s not going to say anything.

  • @samsamboi4042
    @samsamboi4042 2 місяці тому +17

    I reckon he didn't do anything

    • @kingflynxi9420
      @kingflynxi9420 2 місяці тому +2

      I mean, he's too boring. It's probably workplace bullying

    • @Ivc406
      @Ivc406 2 місяці тому

      How is he a major BBC star get a grip he was a pundit on motd and one show major star,but he gets a start on talk sport !!!!!???

    • @jonsweeney3845
      @jonsweeney3845 2 місяці тому +1

      Really? Look up him and Phil neville match of the day.

    • @paulturner8372
      @paulturner8372 2 місяці тому +1

      He didn't seem woke enough for them.

    • @G4MER28
      @G4MER28 2 місяці тому +1

      even if he did, he cant really talk about it

  • @interestedbystander196
    @interestedbystander196 2 місяці тому +1

    Why was it "important to air that"?

  • @ps5andstuffhere
    @ps5andstuffhere 2 місяці тому +2

    This is very strange stuff

  • @carolelangat-fortune4557
    @carolelangat-fortune4557 2 місяці тому +1

    Why try having him to comment on a developing story when he hasn't had a chance to review all the issues! 😒😒😡😡😡

  • @meichong8278
    @meichong8278 2 місяці тому +4

    Exclusive interview !! ........ Where ?....

  • @eddiehockley4144
    @eddiehockley4144 2 місяці тому +1

    Jermaine should do a podcast about the BBC with the other guy Huw Edwards. He could call it "
    "Huw Jenas".

  • @carolphillips4624
    @carolphillips4624 2 місяці тому +4

    They didn’t act that fast with Huw either

  • @Gius3pp3K
    @Gius3pp3K 2 місяці тому +2

    Jermaine Jenas was punished for not flushing the toilet after dropping a log 😂😂😂

  • @walters720
    @walters720 2 місяці тому +10

    Wasn't he gay and woke enough.

  • @dannyjonze
    @dannyjonze 2 місяці тому +1

    why didnt he just write a statement

    • @G4MER28
      @G4MER28 2 місяці тому

      He cant really write about it.