Jiang Zemin was a very sophisticated well versed and well educated chinese president, he doesn't get much global recognition as he deserved. Eventhough he rarely speaks english in public, but he speaks perfect english.
Jiang Zemin passed away today at the age of 96. As a leader, he had lead China on a path of economic progress and prosperity from 1989 to 2002. He will be remembered.
苟利国家生死以，岂因祸福避趋之 One should uphold his country’s interest with his life, he should not do things just to pursue his personal gains and he should not be evade responsibilities for fear of personal loss.
Jiang's family is very privileged in China and have built up a wealth of over $1.5 billion through corruption. He was more powerful than Hu Jintoa. On par with Xi Xinping. Deng Xiaoping could have been President for life but gave it up, dying in early 2000's.
So many years have passed, Jiang 's wisdom is emerging with time. A lot of military and economy basement is built by him. I used to mock him on many Chinese online platforms, while now I really respect him.
I’m amazed how witty Jiang was in the interview. If you didn’t get it, the interviewer asked Jiang if he admired the courage of “that man” at Tiananmen Square, Jiang replied that he admired the courage of the tank driver not running the protestor down. 9:00
Kind of gives insight into American culture and Chinese culture. Of course the American would emphasize the lone individual. Chinese culture emphasizes society over the individual.
16:02 speaking as an American, never gets any less ridiculous seeing Americans so shocked that people in other countries know about America’s current affairs and history; like just listen to him, he acts like Jiang just told him that he can grow wings and fly
I laughed and joked about this interview 7 years ago and now I realize how foolish I was as this was indeed a great interview. Both sides demonstrated respect and thrived on the mutual aim of diminishing misunderstanding between people of the two nations. Not to mention that Mr.Wallace threw out difficult yet valued questions which made the interview worth watching. Time has gone and quality conversations like this are so hard to find on conventional medias (if there's any). My respect to 江主席 and Mr.Wallace.
I don't think there is much respect... Americans at that time clearly had no idea how China works. They should read about history of China before judging.
@@carkod well I can understand whatever such drastic difference between the culture of the two countries could create. Maybe my expectations was low to begin with and there's no obligations for Americans to learn Chinese history anyway :) Things will work out between the two countries eventually.
@@SprintingHead No, but in terms of electing your leader, you would a-point those who understand deeply about nations that are diplomatically engaged with your country. At least that was what your where suppose to do.
I absolutely love finding these older interviews. As a millennial I can’t consume enough of this type of content. Everything put out today is absolute garbage with no real content value. I want to find an archive of everything like this
its not the content...its people's patient....by that time TV interview is a precious resource and film is expensive(money wasted when thing go wrong) nowadays? people will response "fake news" and move on to their own source of release
Mike Wallace was a national treasure. This interview is very good, it is easy to see why Jiang Zeman was in the position he was in as a politician. Very diplomatic, charming and clearly intelligent
pretty sure he was given a script of the answers beforehand, its common practice for most interviewees to ask for the questions they will be asked so they can prepare
@@caspers50calibermachinegun36 60min specifically said it was a candid interview. Candid meaning zero prep or knowledge of questioned being asked beforehand for the interviewee
I remember his interviews on American television 60 minutes with Mike Wallace and televison host Barbara Walters. The journalists were baffled how sophisticated Jiang Zemin was in answering the questions even the controversial ones. Though he never gave interview in english, but not many people knew he can speak perfect english and is very fond of english literature himself.
@@sebastianoyan7643 perfect english is when you bring the message across understandably. some people who speaks english do not even know how to bring the message across clearly.
@Aleatoriedade Quântica since we are going to generalise, I would like to point out that right wing guys are legendary in seeing imaginary things behind a non existence facade. A trait that was on full display during the last US elections. Matter of fact, there is a group without the basic knowledge of what an audit just finished 'Auditing" the ballots and the balloting machine in Arizona. They were not able to show any evidence for a dozen of stuff they claim they saw during the elections. Not one.
@@TheGrmany69 Why? You mean to imply his polite demeanor wasn't so? Perhaps you are referring to his strong and unwavering demeanor? He was basically being interrogated in this interview. You don't think he had the right and obligation to defend his country and people? He was very respectful to Bob Anderson, anyway.
Indeed. Jiang had a very interesting approach to dealing with media trick questions, and his concise way of explaining issues from the perspective of the CPC is quite commendable.
This wasn't an interview. It was an interrogation. The interviewer forgot himself. Journalists deal in facts, not speculation or arbitrary ideas like "heart" like he brought up many times. Even at the end while Jiang talked about promoting mutual understanding, the interviewer rudely continued to cross his arms and act defiantly. The man was literally a guest invited by the president of China.
Wallace was candid about his views, but his finger pointing was offensive. Like many, he really could not comprehend the underlying philosophies and realities about life and politics of a very different culture. And like many, his unwarranted sense of superiority, prevented him from at least trying to understand or acknowledge counter-points which the former President was trying to explain. No wonder Sino-American relations have been difficult.
I felt the same. Decorum -wise, Wallace should have shown more humility and manners. He could have put his questions and POV across within his offensive hand gestures, grimacing and tone.
when the interviewer did this interview, I can not find any intention for him to try to understand china as you can easily see from the arrogant attitude. this is common sense. if two person have a discuss with mutual respect, then they are trying to understand each other. so clearly there is a mission behind it why the interviewer tries every means to diminish Presedant. Jiang. To show off his or american's superiority, that's it, so simple. Nothing but show off typical american arrogance. After 22 years, you can tell how hypocritical american are. where is human right when people protest on wallstreet, and the police use violence against them. why suddenly Trump was blocked from the whole internet, where is freedom speech? the examples are countless. the old saying never goes outdated, that a man speaks value all the time, he is counting business all the time. its true for capitalism, dont forget capitalism literally means captial is above everything. value is nothing infront of captial.
Mike Wallace was his own man. He was never one to respect the rules. I guess I see it differently. I think Wallace was so passionate in his objections precisely because he understood the power and weight that Zemin held. I think the two respected each other. Just my take.
I would admire President Jiang's candidness, elegance and tolerance during the interview. Can any one tell me that Wallace's gestures and even style of interrogating indicate his sense and tones of superiority?
Yeah, I'd like to see how old Mike would have handled a foreign power instigating a colour revolution in his country, or even run a country as China. It's easy to be condescending and wag fingers when you're just some disposable reporter.
Excellent interview. I share Jiang Zemin's sentiment that one day we can have mutual understanding. I believe the people of America and China want this as well.
I really like him ,he is wiser than most of leaders in the world .and now we have a happy,rich and stable life ,wish you long live and be happy all the time ❤
yea. Seems like Jiang was cool with Mr. Wallace though. At least in his other video he praised the interviewer skills of mr wallace in comparison to the chinese reporters
On the contrary, it makes President Jiang looks great. It's the words in reply that counts. When petty western media portray China in bad light, it is always noticeable.
I still remember when Vladimir Putin was interviewed on NBC, they used a photo of him where he was looking up and they edited the photo to be darker and make his eyes harder to see. They basically tried to make it look like a villain in a comic book movie. It was embarrassing. Yet we mock other countries for their propaganda.
Wallace is putting himself in a poor light. Why is it necessary to point his finger repeatedly at the interviewee no matter what he is thinking about him? This surely is an unfriendly and impolite body posture.
Jiang was no ones fool. He spoke multiple languages (including english, japanese, korean), studied multiple cultures, and was a gifted diplomat and speaker. Im not a fan of his personal politics, but, incredibly intelligent man.
Actually he studied electronic engineering in CTU（today SJTU ranked 50 or so in QS）and he could play the guitar（ukulele）and chinning 24 times persistently.
As a Chinese I can confidently tell you he is a good leader, I wish for democracy, I’m against dictators like Xi Jinping. But democracy doesn’t mean everyone selects their leader, in his term most of the people were granted the basic human right, and his contribution to economy of China is just too significant. You might say he’s corrupt and persecuted falun going, but his accomplishment far overweight these flaws .
@ethanhu4960 Falun Gong is a cult anyway. They run a newspaper in the US called Epoch Times and espouse extremely right wing, fascist views and spread qanon and love Trump.
During Jiang’s tenure 93-03, China’s GDP increased fourfold. He introduced the village level local election ( this is extent of direct election china can tolerate btw). Liberal spirit fills the air. Massage parlors were out of control. Not like now. You know what I mean. Deng is good at rural policy. Jiang is good at building up manufacturing bases and reforming state owned enterprises.
China can tolerate a lot, it's persisted in some form or other through the ages. Who knows if China could benefit from regional elections or the like as well? (It works in HK and Taiwan after all). Or maybe not elections but some other form of formal political participation, other than trying to make your way up through the CCP. If the society can factually tolerate more democratic elements is obviously not the immediate concern - of course it could in some way. It is merely the party that deems it more beneficial to its own, and thereby presumably the countries future, and most people nowadays just accept that as true.
Jiang Zemin really demonstrating patience here, the questions were all emotional stuff, the definition of dictatorship was nothing one could actually respond to but some weird metaphor and the question about the tank man was leading as well. Not really a way of interviewing that'll lead to understanding the Chinese system of governing or what actually went down in '89, but I guess that's American TV.
Actually, it's the exact way of interviewing to understand Chinese governance, or any politician for that matter. Notice the way he was happy to hide behind kind words? Interviewers should strive to make the other party elaborate and defend their point of view. The definition of dictatorship can easily be defended against. The CCP isn't a dictatorship, simple. The issue is the totalitarianism slant of the regime
@@niceshotmano but why should we argue over the definition of a word, an abstract concept, rather than what is ACTUALLY happening? I mean, the tiananmen standpoint was more realistic, but they were just pointing out the 1 man, and Zemin explained the Chinese perspective over the matter
Let me answer. At that time, there were two factions of the Chinese Communist Party, one reformist conservative, the other reformist radical. It went on for days when China had no police security equipment, only the military. Students were not killed, and soldiers were killed by spies who mingled with the crowd. To incite bloodshed. The United States, Hong Kong and Taiwan are behind the event. If troops are not mobilized, China may split. Like the breakup of the Soviet Union, like the Arab Spring.
I don't think a single word that came out of his mouth is controversial. The US and China are completely different places across the world and have completely different history and culture. What is best for us isn't always what's best for them
That's a stupid smoke screen. There is no inconceivable cultural mystique lurking in the shadows & the US's ills stem mostly from its lack of democracy (the Senate which should be abolished, the Electoral College which should be abolished, Gerrymandered districts, irregular & unjust primary rules that allow incumbents to run unopposed, lifetime rather than 12 year SCOTUS terms with 3 judges appointed in the 1st year of each Prez mandate, the ability of states to deprive voting rights to felons (along with a blatantly pay-to-play legal & criminal justice system), private & for-profit prisons, an all pervasive surveillance state where the NSA still in 2024 can watch Americans through their cell phone cameras even when turned off & all their texts (since authorizing programs of project PRISM were never ended but in fact strengthened earlier this year), the fact that elections are sold to the highest bidder, the lack of federally funded education system throgh university level so that all can access the necessary tools to high-level economic & informed political participation, the list goes on and on).
Mike was such a legend in the world of journalism. SEVEN DECADES worth of work in the field, interviews with some of the most influential people in the world, dozens of Emmys. May he rest in peace.
Great interview and very eye opening to how one of China's leaders thought. Very different demeanor compared to prideful western leaders who believe they know what is best for different countries. I find it very nice to share similar sentiments about governing and politics with a man like Zemin even though I live on the over side of the world. If only American politicians would put their pride aside and focus on what this country really needs.
To all democrats questioned Jiang back then on why he banned Evangelicals and the cult Falungong in this video, i Hope in 2020 on how much false information they used to support Trump champion can give you guys an idea.
@John Clemens P. Rubi shaolin and Muslims are legit organization/religion, the majority members have unharmful belief. In comparison, Falungong Is a cult. Putting Falungong alongside with Shaolin and Muslim Is a massive assault to shanlin and Muslim! Seriously, please don't compare these three. Please research a little more even just on their website, you will realize how crazy that cult Is.
@John Clemens P. Rubi Tibetan who burnt themselves and extreme Muslims are very limited cases of some extremist members or abnormal behavior in a certain time. Whereas Falungong' Li Hongzhi managed to make people believe he's the chosen one, a combination of Jesus and Buddha. Falungong also suggest people DO NOT take medicine when sick but practice Falungong, which caused many death. Please understand the difference between cult and religion then do your own research about Falungong. But yeah i don't blame you for having trouble to do much search about them. There aren't enough resources in English online.
Interviewers should be at the same level with whoever he is talking to. At least just at the room. If someone is dominant, nothing truthful will come out.
its good you sharing your oppinions or facts with the rest of the world, but do so in a language we can understand, else your preaching the choir and we learn nothing from it, and you gain nothing from it.
I disagree with that, he drives china went thru curved path but he probably not the best one. Each Chinese leaders get elected for a reason and they are tough just like other.
Jiang era is about corruption and under table money. China was quite poor that time, weak per GDP capita. I will say is easier to do illegal and succeed at that time and he close eyes on that. Its subjective, legit person respect Xi era more. Illegal person respect jiang as best.
I agree that the premier was respectful and polite. Mike Wallace was not disrespectful. It is his job to hold politicians and other powerful people to account. You can’t do that without asking tough questions. Have a look at HardTalk on the BBC for similarly tough interviews.
@@marcuscrowley6496 If anybody talks to you whilst sneering at you and pointing finger to your face - what would you react? Do you really think that is the right way anybody should be treated? You can ask hard questions, but please do it in a respectful manner. The interviewer is a pompous, condescending, and disgusting figure to say the least. 👎👎👎
You just saying that it is a worse mistake to point a finger on a dictator than the dictator who is responsible for murdered of millions of innocents 1989 student protest. What a great judgement you people are pointing.
Greetings to you Sir, it seems you are from China? I have always wanted to keep in touch with someone from China, As I would be very interested in talking to you, if it's ok with you we can gets to communicate better outside the forum and share some bussiness ideas together in respect of your country that Can be of so much benefits to you.. thanks I will be waiting for your reply
Jiang Zemin drew circles around Mike Wallace! If I were Chinese I would feel proud of his performance. I say that while still believing that China is an autocracy with hefty doses of meritocracy at many different levels.
Jiang definitely got there because of his merit, and he is an incredibly intelligent person -- he got into one of the best universities in china pre CCP. He wasn't a dictator per se. Back then, a politburo with 9 committee member decided most issues. It's not a meritocracy anymore. Xi appointed his yes man to all positions.
Zemin practically laughing at Wallace naivete re: bombing of Belgrade embassy was a mistake! Also: "we have friends in the leadership of both parties" 😂
I think the 90s culminating in 2000 was a pretty dope time to be alive. If there was a time machine that let you live in one time forever, 2000 might be a pretty hot destination
I didn't see this originally. I didn't even understand why they were showing it until I read that he had passed. This is an incredible incredible insightful view into the Chinese Communist party 22 years ago. I expect from some point many of the beliefs are still the same and some have changed just as we have our Republican party that was on one track at one time and on a completely different track now. Incredibly insightful conversation that has taught me more about China and I think I even understood.
Xi is basically bringing China back to Mao thinking. Dissent is being crushed without remorse. They are cracking down on LGBTQ big time. They recently issued guidance saying no ‘feminine-acting’ or ‘feminine-looking’ men can be shown on TV. This is in direct reference to what they perceive as K-Pop influence. LGBTQ groups are being silenced harshly. Some cities were beginning to have small pride celebrations in 2019, but there are now none in any city
This looks more like an interrogation than an interview. The way Wallace had his arms crossed during most of the interview shows he is not willing to take in whatever Jiang has to say (i.e. not willing to have a conversation). Wallace is just asking questions and he thinks he already knows the answers. Unfortunately, this kind of arrogance is adopted by most of the US politicians/decision-makers as well and really put the US at a disadvantage in a US-China standoff that looks increasingly unavoidable (just think how much China knows about the US vs. the otherway around).
@@VacuumDweller you must be blind. Wallace was straight disrespectful to Jiang, and ignore his responses by behaving like blah blah blah, is that the qualities of US interview? 😂
late to this but as a politician your job is to speak for the people you should be interviewed hard and fairly. There is no bullshitting in this interview, as there should be no bullshitting in speaking for the people you work to look after
Bruh, he didnt forget. He was thinking what would happen if he says yes or no back at the States. Good answer is abstain, just like the President continually did
US bombed China's embassy with three missiles. This US journalist pointed his figure at China's president and asked "why don't you think it wasn't an accident and what would the US get out of it"? Imagine a Saudi or Afghan journalist asking Bush "why don't you think 911 is an accident?"
Bombing the embassy was a accident it wasn't on purpose.....what about the commercial plane China blew up killing majority chinese on the plane and then covered up the high speed train accident from Beijing and Shanghai 10 years ago I believe
@@jeffrey7737 Your logic is great. Here is an analogy of what you just said: "I killed your family but it was an accident; why don't you agree (pointing your finger at me)? And btw, you killed your cousin 10 years ago". Let me reply: "I don't think it is an accident, and am entitled to my own opinion based on facts and my own judgement. I decided to move on but you are not even making sincere apologies. Btw, the people of Somalia, Iraq, Syria and Libya are suffering more due to your involvement than under dictators just so you know. And also, put your fingers away, and do not point at me. You owe me an apology, not the other way around!"
@@gongchang02 we said sorry didn't we? Even public....even our own media attacked the mistake.....has chinese media attacked China for Spies we catch ? For students we catch spying ? Had chinese government and media attacked the higher ups about blowing up the plane ? China is Syria with its big brother Russia don't you know?
@@lavenderli767 Asian 太分裂了。asian被欺负被打被仇恨 真是罪有应得。把对中国的恨 转移到美国华人身上来吧。 American Asian is a wired group which hates themsevles. Please move all your hate of China to American Asian. And many people hate Asians because they cannot go to China, but they can see lots of American Asians everyday.
20 years on, China has helped 600mil of its people punch above poverty line. Whereas Americans full freedom mindset caused 300k people died of covid, and racism continued to prevail.
Mike Wallace was allowed to point and finger wag, he's earned that right it was also in good spirited conversation and jest. Relax lemmings. The President and Mike clearly displayed mutual respect to one another.
@@gustavoabreu3097 The Tiananmen incident was caused by the students' opposition to capitalism and the abolition of job assignments. The coup d'etat by China's chairman Zhao Ziyang and his secretary took advantage of these students.
In terms of answering interview questions, Jiang did well. He’s not as nerdy as the Chinese leaders in the knowledge of most people. But quite to the opposite. People have different opinions on him in China.
@@MegaWarell Well that was back then when Xi is not even close to the top. Scripted or not it was a true interview and you can point out the disinformation if there was any. You can start now
Jiang Zemin owned this reporter like how MJ owns the slow white guy on a basketball court. When JZ was questioned about being a dictator, he was corrected that the entire party has to agree on the decisions that he makes which is anything but a dictatorship, then Anderson tried to bring up tank man as if he could make a point without realising that the man was trying to stop the tanks from LEAVING the tanks. Anderson was trolling but was outsmarted. Simple as that.
its good you sharing your oppinions or facts with the rest of the world, but do so in a language we can understand, else your preaching the choir and we learn nothing from it, and you gain nothing from it.
“Too young too simple, sometimes naive. ”
- Chairman Jiang Ze-min
After growing up i finally realized he was right. We were young too simple sometimes naive.
Jiang Zemin was a very sophisticated well versed and well educated chinese president, he doesn't get much global recognition as he deserved. Eventhough he rarely speaks english in public, but he speaks perfect english.
Jiang Zemin passed away today at the age of 96. As a leader, he had lead China on a path of economic progress and prosperity from 1989 to 2002. He will be remembered.
Indeed he will. Unlike that totalitarian goon Xi Jinping.
Atleast he wasn't worse than Xi
And could take criticism and jokes pretty well. How did we get Winnie the Pooh as leader.
@@rosec_rose6661how can’t xi take criticism
@@Dee-wl8yjcall him a Winnie the Pooh on Chinese internet in China without a VPN. You’ll get a visit from the Chinese police very soon.
He will be remembered for dealing with the Tiananmen Square issue, that's for sure
苟利国家生死以，岂因祸福避趋之
One should uphold his country’s interest with his life, he should not do things just to pursue his personal gains and he should not be evade responsibilities for fear of personal loss.
活捉朽木
疫情当中有没有勤锻炼
苟利国家生死以 岂因福祸避趋之？
赶紧来续一秒
卧槽，我看的视频你是不是都看过
Condolence to the Chinese people and to the bereaved family of Pres. Jiang
😀❤
Jiang's family is very privileged in China and have built up a wealth of over $1.5 billion through corruption. He was more powerful than Hu Jintoa. On par with Xi Xinping. Deng Xiaoping could have been President for life but gave it up, dying in early 2000's.
Of course he knows more about China than the interviewer does. But he seems to know about America more than Americans do.
Very good! It’s also very disrespectful of the white man to keep pointing his damn finger at people.
@@laqueenawilliams4762 Mike Wallace is white?
@@TwoPyramid yeah!!! What happened to Mike Wallace’s face??? Too much self-suntan creme?!?!
Know yourself and know the enemy, and you can fight a hundred battles with no danger of defeat
Mr.Jiang of course,is broad minded 😂
So many years have passed, Jiang 's wisdom is emerging with time. A lot of military and economy basement is built by him. I used to mock him on many Chinese online platforms, while now I really respect him.
@Xu Zheng 同行们是谁？ 😂 不会是川普们吧？ 还是国内的其他同行？
nashville evidence chinese inside job or lazer attack you decide - worldtruthvideos.org/watch/DCHh2StxbOT6tqd
well these days you'd be locked up for that
@@festusbojangles7027 such a pity I'm still healthy and sound
Now you can’t mock anyone can you 😂
I’m amazed how witty Jiang was in the interview. If you didn’t get it, the interviewer asked Jiang if he admired the courage of “that man” at Tiananmen Square, Jiang replied that he admired the courage of the tank driver not running the protestor down. 9:00
😂 You call this witty ????
Kind of gives insight into American culture and Chinese culture. Of course the American would emphasize the lone individual. Chinese culture emphasizes society over the individual.
Whether you are native speaker or not, you should definitely learn some English
@@josephluo7463 You should definitely learn some Chinese as well as Chinese culture if you do want to understand a retired president from China
That's not what he said at all. What are you even talking about?
16:02 speaking as an American, never gets any less ridiculous seeing Americans so shocked that people in other countries know about America’s current affairs and history; like just listen to him, he acts like Jiang just told him that he can grow wings and fly
I laughed and joked about this interview 7 years ago and now I realize how foolish I was as this was indeed a great interview. Both sides demonstrated respect and thrived on the mutual aim of diminishing misunderstanding between people of the two nations. Not to mention that Mr.Wallace threw out difficult yet valued questions which made the interview worth watching. Time has gone and quality conversations like this are so hard to find on conventional medias (if there's any). My respect to 江主席 and Mr.Wallace.
this is character development right here
I don't think there is much respect... Americans at that time clearly had no idea how China works. They should read about history of China before judging.
@@carkod well I can understand whatever such drastic difference between the culture of the two countries could create. Maybe my expectations was low to begin with and there's no obligations for Americans to learn Chinese history anyway :) Things will work out between the two countries eventually.
@@SprintingHead No, but in terms of electing your leader, you would a-point those who understand deeply about nations that are diplomatically engaged with your country. At least that was what your where suppose to do.
@@zezhixia9784 哈哈哈哈哈哈哈
Shocked and saddened to learn that former president Jiang Zemin passed away at 96 years of age.
He was 96
@@BristolBerg way to old if you ask me.
I absolutely love finding these older interviews. As a millennial I can’t consume enough of this type of content. Everything put out today is absolute garbage with no real content value. I want to find an archive of everything like this
I can share some clips with you
Exactly. When is CBS going to put the 60 minutes archive online?
its not the content...its people's patient....by that time TV interview is a precious resource and film is expensive(money wasted when thing go wrong)
nowadays? people will response "fake news" and move on to their own source of release
i feel fully the same way i find this type of very fascinating ....
Yeah thing is ...
the exact same PedoMedia then is the exact same PedoMedia now.
He is surely knowledgable and profound. Both of them. This was a true high level interview.
Mike Wallace was a national treasure.
This interview is very good, it is easy to see why Jiang Zeman was in the position he was in as a politician. Very diplomatic, charming and clearly intelligent
what a smart person Jiang Zemin is, knew how to answer even the tough questions
pretty sure he was given a script of the answers beforehand, its common practice for most interviewees to ask for the questions they will be asked so they can prepare
@@caspers50calibermachinegun36 of course but he was prepared
@@caspers50calibermachinegun36 60min specifically said it was a candid interview. Candid meaning zero prep or knowledge of questioned being asked beforehand for the interviewee
talking to each other is always better than just talking behind each one's back
I remember his interviews on American television 60 minutes with Mike Wallace and televison host Barbara Walters. The journalists were baffled how sophisticated Jiang Zemin was in answering the questions even the controversial ones. Though he never gave interview in english, but not many people knew he can speak perfect english and is very fond of english literature himself.
what's the definition of perfect English
@@sebastianoyan7643 perfect english is when you bring the message across understandably. some people who speaks english do not even know how to bring the message across clearly.
一进来就是一个+1s，很快啊！
I felt that he answered very politically and diplomatic. (Although this interview came across as an interragation).
@AI 5 Exactly. "He's very polite" give me a break.
because he was the president of china,not usa
@Aleatoriedade Quântica since we are going to generalise, I would like to point out that right wing guys are legendary in seeing imaginary things behind a non existence facade.
A trait that was on full display during the last US elections.
Matter of fact, there is a group without the basic knowledge of what an audit just finished 'Auditing" the ballots and the balloting machine in Arizona.
They were not able to show any evidence for a dozen of stuff they claim they saw during the elections.
Not one.
@@TheGrmany69 I can speak mandarin, and he is indeed polite, the translator makes him sound so aggressive
@@TheGrmany69 Why? You mean to imply his polite demeanor wasn't so? Perhaps you are referring to his strong and unwavering demeanor? He was basically being interrogated in this interview. You don't think he had the right and obligation to defend his country and people? He was very respectful to Bob Anderson, anyway.
Rest in peace. The real legend that brought us Modern Day China.
JIANG's insights are amazing. Look back, he is correct on many issues 20 years ago.
Indeed. Jiang had a very interesting approach to dealing with media trick questions, and his concise way of explaining issues from the perspective of the CPC is quite commendable.
Ur wrong all Chinese leader are killers
I love how Jiang isnt offended by Mike Wallace
Yeah, I liked when instead of answer one question he just laughed as he took a sip of tea!
Beta imperialist: "You are the last major Communist dictatorship"
Alpha socialist: *starts singing anti-colonialist songs*
It is a dictatorship. Your only argument is always whataboutism
Giga Chad Democratic Person: *Reject All Authoritarian Ideas*
man he was so smart, not falling into traps
Great journalism. If only media held US government officials to this level of criticism
Exactly
This wasn't an interview. It was an interrogation. The interviewer forgot himself. Journalists deal in facts, not speculation or arbitrary ideas like "heart" like he brought up many times. Even at the end while Jiang talked about promoting mutual understanding, the interviewer rudely continued to cross his arms and act defiantly. The man was literally a guest invited by the president of China.
Jiang's face when he said "of course, this is big mistake!" and pointed at the sky had me bent over
Jiang zemin is profoundingly intelligent and well balanced
RARE IN USA
and a great singer
And very precise. The man was honest in a very appreciable way as well.
Lol you apparently know nothing about “the toad” hahaha
The human toad is responsible for genocide
watch the interview made 20 years ago,
it is getting clear, what is right and what is wrong ......
It's clear Jiang Zemin was right!
It's clear that capitalism didn't bring democracy to China (or to America).
@@Hermes_Agoraeus There won’t be true democracy exist in the world even in the US
@@jl3802 Related, if interested: poets.org/poem/let-america-be-america-again
Jiang is not a dictator, Xi is.
Wallace was candid about his views, but his finger pointing was offensive.
Like many, he really could not comprehend the underlying philosophies and realities about life and politics of a very different culture.
And like many, his unwarranted sense of superiority, prevented him from at least trying to understand or acknowledge counter-points which the former President was trying to explain.
No wonder Sino-American relations have been difficult.
Orang putih selalu merasa bahwa mereka adalah ras unggul, tidak heran orang ini berlaku demikian.. Bangsa koboy tidak tahu etika adat orang timur.
I felt the same. Decorum -wise, Wallace should have shown more humility and manners. He could have put his questions and POV across within his offensive hand gestures, grimacing and tone.
when the interviewer did this interview, I can not find any intention for him to try to understand china as you can easily see from the arrogant attitude. this is common sense. if two person have a discuss with mutual respect, then they are trying to understand each other. so clearly there is a mission behind it why the interviewer tries every means to diminish Presedant. Jiang. To show off his or american's superiority, that's it, so simple. Nothing but show off typical american arrogance. After 22 years, you can tell how hypocritical american are. where is human right when people protest on wallstreet, and the police use violence against them. why suddenly Trump was blocked from the whole internet, where is freedom speech? the examples are countless. the old saying never goes outdated, that a man speaks value all the time, he is counting business all the time. its true for capitalism, dont forget capitalism literally means captial is above everything. value is nothing infront of captial.
@@lovemusic-kl5pl Exactamente
Mike Wallace was his own man. He was never one to respect the rules. I guess I see it differently. I think Wallace was so passionate in his objections precisely because he understood the power and weight that Zemin held. I think the two respected each other. Just my take.
how is 60 minutes not verified
Here is the whole 60 minutes video. ua-cam.com/video/BO23ZWII8R8/v-deo.html
You are verified
because they always make fake news.
Google knelt to China that's why
@@mu0FFpu0FF maybe because all you hear about China is not right.
I would admire President Jiang's candidness, elegance and tolerance during the interview. Can any one tell me that Wallace's gestures and even style of interrogating indicate his sense and tones of superiority?
you are right dear friend. I live near Barcelona Spain.
Mike Wallace is an arrogant guy in a very bad manner. I wouldn't tolerate him if I were Jiang. Maybe that's why he could be the president :)
He was condescending.
He is Jews you know About Zionism no suprise how Mike Wallace Behave
Yeah, I'd like to see how old Mike would have handled a foreign power instigating a colour revolution in his country, or even run a country as China. It's easy to be condescending and wag fingers when you're just some disposable reporter.
7:30 "im very willing to answer this question"
*immediately cuts away*
You know he made an excellent point that US media didn't want to show lol.
You are right.
k
Excellent interview. I share Jiang Zemin's sentiment that one day we can have mutual understanding. I believe the people of America and China want this as well.
It’s hard to not like this guy, so homely and honest
I really like him ,he is wiser than most of leaders in the world .and now we have a happy,rich and stable life ,wish you long live and be happy all the time ❤
The finger wagging and finger pointing arrogance. It is pretty ill mannered move regarded in almost every culture.
@Secularism is Paganism hahahaha. Stop running defense for a man which imprisoned 2 million fallun gong.
60min programme interviewer is always hostile and aggressive to the interviewee, it is the characteristic of the show.
@@fuck4317 boo hoo, the cultists didn't get their way
yea. Seems like Jiang was cool with Mr. Wallace though. At least in his other video he praised the interviewer skills of mr wallace in comparison to the chinese reporters
@@peihenglan1089 I wouldn't say all, but that gives the hard off the cuff jóurnalism.
Notice the different angles to picture Jiang and Wallace. A normal picture for Wallace and a strange one for Jiang, which made him look indecent.
Jiang was leaning half sideways in a of his shots.
yes, that’s their trick, just like BBC CNN have to use grey lense whenever shooting China to make China gloomy and “oppressed”
On the contrary, it makes President Jiang looks great. It's the words in reply that counts. When petty western media portray China in bad light, it is always noticeable.
I still remember when Vladimir Putin was interviewed on NBC, they used a photo of him where he was looking up and they edited the photo to be darker and make his eyes harder to see. They basically tried to make it look like a villain in a comic book movie. It was embarrassing. Yet we mock other countries for their propaganda.
Good eyes
Rest in peace, comrade Jiang Zemin. Always complex, never naive~
Wallace is putting himself in a poor light. Why is it necessary to point his finger repeatedly at the interviewee no matter what he is thinking about him? This surely is an unfriendly and impolite body posture.
Great interview, now please upload the Wallace interview of Deng Xiaoping.
yeah i need to see that
@@spectator8285 his dead now 😭
@@sumeersamarat706 thats why we need video
I really want to see that. I don't understand why 60 Minutes does not upload these interviews more frequently.
Jiang was no ones fool. He spoke multiple languages (including english, japanese, korean), studied multiple cultures, and was a gifted diplomat and speaker. Im not a fan of his personal politics, but, incredibly intelligent man.
@DennisEstrada I'm not a bot. Just search Jiang English Interview and it'll pop right up. He spoke four languages.
@DennisEstrada He does. Put some effort in and look for the videos yourself.
Actually he studied electronic engineering in CTU（today SJTU ranked 50 or so in QS）and he could play the guitar（ukulele）and chinning 24 times persistently.
As a Chinese I can confidently tell you he is a good leader, I wish for democracy, I’m against dictators like Xi Jinping. But democracy doesn’t mean everyone selects their leader, in his term most of the people were granted the basic human right, and his contribution to economy of China is just too significant. You might say he’s corrupt and persecuted falun going, but his accomplishment far overweight these flaws .
@ethanhu4960 Falun Gong is a cult anyway. They run a newspaper in the US called Epoch Times and espouse extremely right wing, fascist views and spread qanon and love Trump.
平心而论，长者这个采访表现相当好
这还是被剪出来的。按照一般套路是要把表现不佳的部分拉出来，如果这些是不佳的部分不知道其他更的那确实更是谈笑风生了
老江水平很高的，轮子骂归骂，但确实有水平。
@@dokingjonson6173 没水平能把轮子弄出中国，江主席做的这件事功在千秋
@@任舒云 弄出了中国现在在西方给中国惹麻烦，也不是上上策
中国国内没有反对党，只有在外部有反对力量，某种程度上是共产党自己养蛊
During Jiang’s tenure 93-03, China’s GDP increased fourfold. He introduced the village level local election ( this is extent of direct election china can tolerate btw). Liberal spirit fills the air. Massage parlors were out of control. Not like now. You know what I mean. Deng is good at rural policy. Jiang is good at building up manufacturing bases and reforming state owned enterprises.
China can tolerate a lot, it's persisted in some form or other through the ages. Who knows if China could benefit from regional elections or the like as well? (It works in HK and Taiwan after all). Or maybe not elections but some other form of formal political participation, other than trying to make your way up through the CCP. If the society can factually tolerate more democratic elements is obviously not the immediate concern - of course it could in some way. It is merely the party that deems it more beneficial to its own, and thereby presumably the countries future, and most people nowadays just accept that as true.
Make brothels great again!
@Edward Laferriere of course the brothels were good. Xi is an idiot for banning the sex industry.
Jiang Zemin really demonstrating patience here, the questions were all emotional stuff, the definition of dictatorship was nothing one could actually respond to but some weird metaphor and the question about the tank man was leading as well. Not really a way of interviewing that'll lead to understanding the Chinese system of governing or what actually went down in '89, but I guess that's American TV.
Actually, it's the exact way of interviewing to understand Chinese governance, or any politician for that matter. Notice the way he was happy to hide behind kind words? Interviewers should strive to make the other party elaborate and defend their point of view.
The definition of dictatorship can easily be defended against. The CCP isn't a dictatorship, simple. The issue is the totalitarianism slant of the regime
@@niceshotmano Well said.
@@niceshotmano but why should we argue over the definition of a word, an abstract concept, rather than what is ACTUALLY happening? I mean, the tiananmen standpoint was more realistic, but they were just pointing out the 1 man, and Zemin explained the Chinese perspective over the matter
@@friskasmaniacalabomination2372 Before raising debates over something, one needs to ensure that his/her opponents interpret the topic the same way.
Let me answer. At that time, there were two factions of the Chinese Communist Party, one reformist conservative, the other reformist radical. It went on for days when China had no police security equipment, only the military. Students were not killed, and soldiers were killed by spies who mingled with the crowd. To incite bloodshed. The United States, Hong Kong and Taiwan are behind the event. If troops are not mobilized, China may split. Like the breakup of the Soviet Union, like the Arab Spring.
我靠，60分钟竟然放出了长者访谈！！！
以前就有，只不过是加上另外的素材和报道一起播，凑够它的60分钟。
这次的是高清完整版。
这是高清修复版啊
@@luwenjun9504 这种本身就是电磁信号的，不存在什么修复不修复的问题，只要把放在库房里当年的播出带拿出来到电脑上采集一下，都会比之前那些民间VHS家用录像带的要清楚很多。。。这是CBS自己的频道，找个清晰的版本不是难事。
I don't think a single word that came out of his mouth is controversial. The US and China are completely different places across the world and have completely different history and culture. What is best for us isn't always what's best for them
That's a stupid smoke screen. There is no inconceivable cultural mystique lurking in the shadows & the US's ills stem mostly from its lack of democracy (the Senate which should be abolished, the Electoral College which should be abolished, Gerrymandered districts, irregular & unjust primary rules that allow incumbents to run unopposed, lifetime rather than 12 year SCOTUS terms with 3 judges appointed in the 1st year of each Prez mandate, the ability of states to deprive voting rights to felons (along with a blatantly pay-to-play legal & criminal justice system), private & for-profit prisons, an all pervasive surveillance state where the NSA still in 2024 can watch Americans through their cell phone cameras even when turned off & all their texts (since authorizing programs of project PRISM were never ended but in fact strengthened earlier this year), the fact that elections are sold to the highest bidder, the lack of federally funded education system throgh university level so that all can access the necessary tools to high-level economic & informed political participation, the list goes on and on).
Mike was such a legend in the world of journalism. SEVEN DECADES worth of work in the field, interviews with some of the most influential people in the world, dozens of Emmys. May he rest in peace.
15:50 dude what a boss Jiang turned the table completely here.
After 4 years of Trump, this guy sounds really reasonable and democratic.
Sad but true. At least the orange clown will be gone soon.
Nothing to see her, just american leftists boot-licking the CCP.
You might want to learn how to spell the word “here” if you want your opinion to be taken with any kind of seriousness.
@@ayopac Not very credible given Drumps fealty to Vladimir Putin. You might want to quit while you're behind
😂😂😂
Look at the way they stare at each other in the eye.It speak a thousand word.
THUMBS UP TO THIS COURAGEOUS LEADER ON ANSWERING ALL THOSE QUESTIONS IN WHICH SOME AREN'T ANY LOGICAL QUESTION AT ALL
这么多年以后来看，长者这次的采访水平还是好高。让我们为长者续上+1s
A中国不能没有欺诈共产党? 什么坏事共产党都干了!中国共产党亡-天定的。中共一直在用宣传，洗脑，谎言，欺骗，诱惑和暴力干掉了太多中国和世界人们的道德规范和人性。20多年来惡魔中共迫害至死上百万平和的法轮功佛法修炼人。还有良知的人退出中共惡魔党，团，队组织，拒绝中共, 弃恶归善吧. 中共和它的追随者要面对历史的淘汰！
@@lavenderli767 扎不多得勒😅
@@xiaoking7684 他在表达自己的观点，跟你有什么关系 shut up
@@David-ih8gh 怎么还惹上轮子了，真他娘的晦气
@@David-ih8gh 这就是言论自由吗？
Great interview and very eye opening to how one of China's leaders thought. Very different demeanor compared to prideful western leaders who believe they know what is best for different countries. I find it very nice to share similar sentiments about governing and politics with a man like Zemin even though I live on the over side of the world. If only American politicians would put their pride aside and focus on what this country really needs.
The uncut version is even better, it make more sense and more clear on the answers.
@@mikemountain7630 can you please link the uncut version I can’t find it
@@bennelong8451 ua-cam.com/video/BO23ZWII8R8/v-deo.html
Uncut version begin at 26 minutes
@@mikemountain7630 thanks bro
@@bennelong8451 np bro
This was a very interesting video plus didn’t even know that there was an interview with Jiang Zemin.
Full interview video is here , ua-cam.com/video/BO23ZWII8R8/v-deo.html
It was very famous among youth in China
Fascinating interview. RIP
Jiang zemin is a strong character. He got guts to answer the American.
To all democrats questioned Jiang back then on why he banned Evangelicals and the cult Falungong in this video, i Hope in 2020 on how much false information they used to support Trump champion can give you guys an idea.
What do you mean ?
@@3Dside13?which part you don't understand? Evangelicans like Kenneth copeland, or falungong mass media organization?
@@3Dside13 Just look up The Epoch Times. It's so propagandistic it's laughable.
@John Clemens P. Rubi shaolin and Muslims are legit organization/religion, the majority members have unharmful belief. In comparison, Falungong Is a cult. Putting Falungong alongside with Shaolin and Muslim Is a massive assault to shanlin and Muslim! Seriously, please don't compare these three. Please research a little more even just on their website, you will realize how crazy that cult Is.
@John Clemens P. Rubi Tibetan who burnt themselves and extreme Muslims are very limited cases of some extremist members or abnormal behavior in a certain time. Whereas Falungong' Li Hongzhi managed to make people believe he's the chosen one, a combination of Jesus and Buddha. Falungong also suggest people DO NOT take medicine when sick but practice Falungong, which caused many death.
Please understand the difference between cult and religion then do your own research about Falungong. But yeah i don't blame you for having trouble to do much search about them. There aren't enough resources in English online.
The sense of superiority of Wallace, now 20 yrs later looking back, is so laughable.
Interviewers should be at the same level with whoever he is talking to. At least just at the room. If someone is dominant, nothing truthful will come out.
Yes Wallace was so arrogant and rude, no idea what made him so superior
You should know Mike Wallace in the US. He’s way above you all. I and he talked and laughed comfortably.
美国的华莱士，比你们不知道高到哪里去了，我和他谈笑风生。
lets all agree that Jiang Zemin himself was a good President no matter under what Political system or by any countries Standard
well .. no one is perfect but relatively he was very good for China and the world ... brought the world decades of peaceful development.
好总统？不可能的事
Yes, he's my favorite of the Chinese leaders.
Better than Xi Jinping
Falun Gong says "hi".
the tank driver is the most patient man I have ever seen.
You haven't seen the full footage of the video. The tank driver let the man into his tank and they left.
@@skazka3789 哥啊，看清楚再发言啊。
@@watercutterlan1401 ua-cam.com/video/qq8zFLIftGk/v-deo.html
Yep you haven't seen the full footage then
@@skazka3789 大哥 实在不行你用百度翻一下我的句子啊。
@@watercutterlan1401 What you said made no sense, don't use Google Translate next time
I am too young and naive… respect for leader who is knowledgeable and candid
被当面骂，依然笑脸相迎。二十年后看，老华莱士才是too young too simple.
Wallace 已经凉了8年了，自以为是啊，江还是厉害！王者！ 不知道现在的领导人是否可以迎接这样的interview。
@@c2h2c2h210 儿子都凉了
@@tcphuma
人云亦云。
你知道个球
@@tcphuma
你和轮子一样。躺在家里。每天做视频。中南海里发生什么都知道。
its good you sharing your oppinions or facts with the rest of the world, but do so in a language we can understand, else your preaching the choir and we learn nothing from it, and you gain nothing from it.
When he was in charge, I thought he was the worst; but now he becomes the best one.
I disagree with that, he drives china went thru curved path but he probably not the best one. Each Chinese leaders get elected for a reason and they are tough just like other.
Jiang era is about corruption and under table money. China was quite poor that time, weak per GDP capita. I will say is easier to do illegal and succeed at that time and he close eyes on that. Its subjective, legit person respect Xi era more. Illegal person respect jiang as best.
went back from tucker carlson's interview with putin
The premier was incredibly respectful and honest. The interviewer was terribly disrespectful and condescending. Honestly it was difficult to watch.
I agree that the premier was respectful and polite. Mike Wallace was not disrespectful. It is his job to hold politicians and other powerful people to account. You can’t do that without asking tough questions. Have a look at HardTalk on the BBC for similarly tough interviews.
@@marcuscrowley6496 If anybody talks to you whilst sneering at you and pointing finger to your face - what would you react? Do you really think that is the right way anybody should be treated? You can ask hard questions, but please do it in a respectful manner.
The interviewer is a pompous, condescending, and disgusting figure to say the least. 👎👎👎
@@marcuscrowley6496 image he was interviewing Trump😂
You just saying that it is a worse mistake to point a finger on a dictator than the dictator who is responsible for murdered of millions of innocents 1989 student protest.
What a great judgement you people are pointing.
@@tashisamdup2159 Millions? Really? Have a look here.
wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/89BEIJING18828_a.html
"Once elected, they will be friendly"
This man was a TRUE LEADER!!! RIP
Very charismatic, wise and charming man, Zemin.
Hope to see the interview with Deng !!!
Greetings to you Sir, it seems you are from China? I have always wanted to keep in touch with someone from China, As I would be very interested in talking to you, if it's ok with you we can gets to communicate better outside the forum and share some bussiness ideas together in respect of your country that Can be of so much benefits to you.. thanks I will be waiting for your reply
RIP. the immortal spirit from and to the people
现在来看这段真是感慨万千，再也不会那么naive了。
Jiang Zemin drew circles around Mike Wallace! If I were Chinese I would feel proud of his performance. I say that while still believing that China is an autocracy with hefty doses of meritocracy at many different levels.
“Presidents are selected, not elected.” ― Franklin Delano Roosevelt
Jiang definitely got there because of his merit, and he is an incredibly intelligent person -- he got into one of the best universities in china pre CCP. He wasn't a dictator per se. Back then, a politburo with 9 committee member decided most issues.
It's not a meritocracy anymore. Xi appointed his yes man to all positions.
@@wngmv let him xi. First times once of times elect 3 times
Wallace was way, way, softer on tobacco companies.
Zemin practically laughing at Wallace naivete re: bombing of Belgrade embassy was a mistake! Also: "we have friends in the leadership of both parties" 😂
loool
Di Dongsheng: And we still do!
what did the us have to gain by bombing the embassy. what was the point? why would it be anything other than a mistake?
@@bloodyplebs u have proof that was a mistake?
@@zeflute4586 you have proof otherwise? Your the one making the claim.
I think the 90s culminating in 2000 was a pretty dope time to be alive. If there was a time machine that let you live in one time forever, 2000 might be a pretty hot destination
2000 was a great year. But none of us knew how important it was to appreciate it.
I didn't see this originally. I didn't even understand why they were showing it until I read that he had passed. This is an incredible incredible insightful view into the Chinese Communist party 22 years ago. I expect from some point many of the beliefs are still the same and some have changed just as we have our Republican party that was on one track at one time and on a completely different track now. Incredibly insightful conversation that has taught me more about China and I think I even understood.
Xi is basically bringing China back to Mao thinking. Dissent is being crushed without remorse. They are cracking down on LGBTQ big time. They recently issued guidance saying no ‘feminine-acting’ or ‘feminine-looking’ men can be shown on TV. This is in direct reference to what they perceive as K-Pop influence. LGBTQ groups are being silenced harshly. Some cities were beginning to have small pride celebrations in 2019, but there are now none in any city
Holycrap the pronunciations of the Chinese leaders' names were spot on 👌🏻
I love this dude. He was right.
Such an interview could never be conducted today with Xi, the power dynamic between American and China has completely changed in the last two decades
我为长者续一秒，May God bless Jiang Zemin
一个全日制高材生，精通八国语言，才华横溢，有血有肉，能屈能伸，可以脱稿在世界各地谈笑风生的人！长者一路走好！致敬！
精通怎么说？这个视频提现了他一般般的英语口语水平，处处是语法错误。怎么算精通？
@@bragbounce9179 看看其他领导人就知道了。他的英语算很好了
@@WildScientist 他要拿他跟其他领导人比，当我没说。很多领导人一辈子还没见过说一次英语呢
This man speaks smart and from the heart he knows how the system works well knowledged very wise and extremely intelligent
Jiang is a fascinating character. Anyone who sits down with Mike Wallace has balls.
He loves to find out if anybody near him is naive, so he is a master at exposing naiveté.
@@Yatukih_001 that is a trait of sociopath
This looks more like an interrogation than an interview. The way Wallace had his arms crossed during most of the interview shows he is not willing to take in whatever Jiang has to say (i.e. not willing to have a conversation). Wallace is just asking questions and he thinks he already knows the answers. Unfortunately, this kind of arrogance is adopted by most of the US politicians/decision-makers as well and really put the US at a disadvantage in a US-China standoff that looks increasingly unavoidable (just think how much China knows about the US vs. the otherway around).
sure thing Chang, keep pumping out that propaganda, maybe one day you'll be a real country instead of a third-world moonscape
@@VacuumDweller You are qualified to run for political offices in the US :)
@@VacuumDweller you must be blind. Wallace was straight disrespectful to Jiang, and ignore his responses by behaving like blah blah blah, is that the qualities of US interview? 😂
late to this but as a politician your job is to speak for the people you should be interviewed hard and fairly. There is no bullshitting in this interview, as there should be no bullshitting in speaking for the people you work to look after
15:45 HAHAHAHA GOT HIM
Amazing how it seems that Mike didn’t realize what he was doing, what point he was making
Bruh, he didnt forget. He was thinking what would happen if he says yes or no back at the States. Good answer is abstain, just like the President continually did
US bombed China's embassy with three missiles. This US journalist pointed his figure at China's president and asked "why don't you think it wasn't an accident and what would the US get out of it"? Imagine a Saudi or Afghan journalist asking Bush "why don't you think 911 is an accident?"
Exactly!!!
Bombing the embassy was a accident it wasn't on purpose.....what about the commercial plane China blew up killing majority chinese on the plane and then covered up the high speed train accident from Beijing and Shanghai 10 years ago I believe
@@jeffrey7737 Your logic is great. Here is an analogy of what you just said: "I killed your family but it was an accident; why don't you agree (pointing your finger at me)? And btw, you killed your cousin 10 years ago". Let me reply: "I don't think it is an accident, and am entitled to my own opinion based on facts and my own judgement. I decided to move on but you are not even making sincere apologies. Btw, the people of Somalia, Iraq, Syria and Libya are suffering more due to your involvement than under dictators just so you know. And also, put your fingers away, and do not point at me. You owe me an apology, not the other way around!"
@@gongchang02 we said sorry didn't we? Even public....even our own media attacked the mistake.....has chinese media attacked China for
Spies we catch ? For students we catch spying ? Had chinese government and media attacked the higher ups about blowing up the plane ? China is Syria with its big brother Russia don't you know?
Obviously, Wallace's intention is same as American's intention in MiddleEast. They think nobody know it, but even a child knows it.
华莱已乘黄鹤去，长者依旧笑春风！+1s
Wallace is dead, Jiang Zemin is alive
wallace was born in 1918 and zemin was born in 1926
A中国不能没有欺诈共产党? 什么坏事共产党都干了!中国共产党亡-天定的。中共一直在用宣传，洗脑，谎言，欺骗，诱惑和暴力干掉了太多中国和世界人们的道德规范和人性。20多年来惡魔中共迫害至死上百万平和的法轮功佛法修炼人。还有良知的人退出中共惡魔党，团，队组织，拒绝中共, 弃恶归善吧. 中共和它的追随者要面对历史的淘汰！
i do not read and speak Mandarin Chinese
@@lavenderli767 梦里啥都有
@@lavenderli767 Asian 太分裂了。asian被欺负被打被仇恨 真是罪有应得。把对中国的恨 转移到美国华人身上来吧。
American Asian is a wired group which hates themsevles. Please move all your hate of China to American Asian. And many people hate Asians because they cannot go to China, but they can see lots of American Asians everyday.
Amazing, candid interview
Farewell, President Jiang❤️
Twenty years proved a lot, I'm grateful to what I have today.
what you have today??? Lol....
50 cent army
@WizardOfAus Yes cuz y’all getting killed for COVID
20 years revealed many things. The tech booming China has today was planned at his time.
20 years on, China has helped 600mil of its people punch above poverty line. Whereas Americans full freedom mindset caused 300k people died of covid, and racism continued to prevail.
Mike Wallace was allowed to point and finger wag, he's earned that right it was also in good spirited conversation and jest. Relax lemmings. The President and Mike clearly displayed mutual respect to one another.
May God bless this man always!!... And may the world remember him always and be thankful for his work on behalf of humanity.
The guy who committed the tianammen square massacre?
@@gustavoabreu3097 then what you will do if people trying to take you down?
Well he is an atheist
@@gustavoabreu3097 He was not in charge of army in 1989, so don't ascribe everything to him.
@@gustavoabreu3097 The Tiananmen incident was caused by the students' opposition to capitalism and the abolition of job assignments. The coup d'etat by China's chairman Zhao Ziyang and his secretary took advantage of these students.
不敢置信，居然回顾了这次采访
想看邓小平的
Something classy about those old times and old journalism
In terms of answering interview questions, Jiang did well. He’s not as nerdy as the Chinese leaders in the knowledge of most people. But quite to the opposite. People have different opinions on him in China.
Politicians should give interviews like this. I believe Xi never ever done a interview.
@@MegaWarell Not true. Come on man Xi's interview about his past is right there on UA-cam
@@zeflute4586 That was a scripted interview by Chinese state media. Definitely not worthy to be called an interview like this one.
@@MegaWarell Well that was back then when Xi is not even close to the top. Scripted or not it was a true interview and you can point out the disinformation if there was any. You can start now
He is viewed as a corrupt
Jiang Zemin owned this reporter like how MJ owns the slow white guy on a basketball court. When JZ was questioned about being a dictator, he was corrected that the entire party has to agree on the decisions that he makes which is anything but a dictatorship, then Anderson tried to bring up tank man as if he could make a point without realising that the man was trying to stop the tanks from LEAVING the tanks. Anderson was trolling but was outsmarted. Simple as that.
Anderson? Thats not his name.
just listen how complex his responses are!! That speaks volumes
垂死病中惊坐起,谈笑风生又一年。
垂死病重惊坐起，向天再借五百年
60分钟档案馆发的视频只有26分钟，时间都去哪儿了？
@@isaacma2452 plus 1998s
中共远东贸易公司ua-cam.com/play/PL7tB6qL0r-AYsDVa96HKTOYIX7EJAgX7I.html
its good you sharing your oppinions or facts with the rest of the world, but do so in a language we can understand, else your preaching the choir and we learn nothing from it, and you gain nothing from it.