HALF THE PRICE!? PolarPro Peter McKinnon vs Freewell Variable ND Mist Filters

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 чер 2024
  • Which Filter Is Better? Freewell or the PolarPro Peter McKinnon Edition ii Variable ND Mist Filter? Freewell costs less than half the price but can they stand up to the PolarPro quality? Vignetting, sharpness, contrast, cross polarization, and ease of use are all factors in what makes a great variable ND filter, but when you add in a diffusion factor as well, things get even more complicated. In this video, we'll take a look at examples and tests shot to see which is best!
    Freewell VND x MIST Filters → geni.us/BGBR
    Polarpro x Peter McKinnon Edition II Mist VND → geni.us/LzRbPFX
    Freewell MIST Filters → geni.us/freewellmist
    =============================
    Relevant Links:
    ▸ How to use ND Filters → • ND Filters EXPLAINED |...
    ▸ Variable ND comparison → • Which VARIABLE ND FILT...
    =============================
    Table of Contents:
    0:00 - Introduction
    0:13 - Video Overview
    0:59 - What is a Variable ND + Mist Filter
    1:41 - Comparison Notes
    2:04 - Price Comparison
    2:22 - Available Thread Sizes
    2:38 - Carrying Cases & Lens Caps
    3:57 - Construction & Vignetting
    4:07 - Hard Stops & Cross Polarization Tests
    5:10 - Stop Notches or Haptic Feedback
    5:52 - Stop Marking Accuracy
    6:24 - Color Cast
    7:02 - Sharpness
    7:13 - What about the Mist Part
    7:19 - Diffusion and Contrast
    8:35 - Bright Daylight Example
    9:45 - Which Filter is Better?
    10:45 - Bonus
    =============================
    Follow Me:
    ▸ Instagram - / dunnadidit
    ▸ Twitter - / dunnadidit
    ▸ Patreon - / dunnadidit
    ▸ Website - www.dunnadidit.com
    =============================
    My Presets and More:
    ▸ Dunna Did It Store - www.dunnadidit.com/store
    =============================
    Music & Stock Footage In My Videos:
    I get my music & stock footage from the following amazing services. Use these links for free trials or sign up bonuses!
    ▸ Musicbed - bit.ly/musicbed01
    ▸ Epidemic Sound - bit.ly/dunnaepidemicsound
    ▸ Artlist - bit.ly/dunnaartlist
    ▸ Artgrid - bit.ly/dunnaartgrid
    =============================
    Main Gear Use to Make My Videos:
    Cameras:
    ▸ Sony A7Siii - geni.us/sony_a7siii
    ▸ Sony A7iii - geni.us/qLI5Ly
    ▸ Sony a6600 - geni.us/XIPEXXT
    Full Frame Lenses:
    ▸ Sigma 24-70 f2.8 (best all around) - geni.us/O8eum
    ▸ Sony 16-35 f2.8 GMii (best wide angle zoom) - geni.us/aUDS
    ▸ Tamron 28-75 f2.8 (affordable all around) - geni.us/tamron28_75
    ▸ Tamron 17-28 f2.8 (affordable wide angle zoom) - geni.us/UaJIF33
    Aps-c Lenses
    ▸ Sigma 16mm f1.4 (best wide angle) - geni.us/Dunna16mm
    ▸ Sigma 30mm f1.4 (great mid range) - geni.us/dunna30mm
    ▸ Sony 18-105 f4 (best all around) - geni.us/Dunna18105
    Audio:
    ▸ Deity D3 (on camera mic) - geni.us/zLdKx
    ▸ Deity D4 Duo (tiny dual on camera mic) - geni.us/deityd4duo
    ▸ Rode Wireless Go (compact wireless system) - geni.us/rH9ou0
    ▸ Rode Podmic (voiceover & podcast mic) - geni.us/rodepodmic_01
    Lighting:
    ▸ Aputure 300d ii (key light) - geni.us/aputure300dii_01
    ▸ Aputure 120d ii (rim/hair light) - geni.us/QEuqps
    ▸ Aputure MC (pocket sized rgb accent light) - geni.us/c8HAAnq
    Other:
    ▸ WANDRD PRVKE 31L (best backpack) - geni.us/wandrdprvke31l
    ▸ iFootage Gazelle Tripod (main studio tripod) - geni.us/GCnlDP
    ▸ iFootage Tripod Head - geni.us/7fEG7hG
    ▸ 3Legged Thing Punks Brian Tripod (travel tripod) - geni.us/BAqA
    Complete Gear List:
    ▸ www.kit.co/dunnadidit
    =============================
    Affiliate Links:
    Some of the links in my video descriptions are affiliate links, which means at no extra cost to you, I will make a small commission if you click them and make a qualifying purchase. If you have a different purchase in mind, you can also use these storewide links below.
    🛒 Amazon - geni.us/shop_amazon
    🛒 B&H Photo - bhpho.to/2KgLwwX
    🛒 Moment - geni.us/shop_moment
    =============================
    Monetarily Supporting The Channel:
    If you wish to support the channel monetarily, you can donate via PayPal here: www.paypal.me/dunnadidit
    This is appreciated and helps the channel, but please don't feel that it is necessary to enjoy my content.
    =============================
    Recommended Channel Tools:
    These are invaluable tools that I use to run my UA-cam channel. Highly recommended if you're trying to take your channel to the next level.
    ▸ Tubebuddy (channel optimization) - www.tubebuddy.com/dunnadidit
    ▸ Morningfame (better titles and video optimization) - morningfa.me/invite/dunnadidit
    =============================
    Professional & Sponsorship Inquiries:
    For professional and sponsorship inquiries, please use the contact form on my website or email contact@dunnadidit.com

КОМЕНТАРІ • 291

  • @micmclane
    @micmclane 3 роки тому +22

    This is how I like to see a comparison video, very well done, clear and concise.
    Liked and subscribed

  • @joseconde8927
    @joseconde8927 2 роки тому +42

    I prefer the freewell , with the polarpro the looks of vegetation and trees are very dark because is too contrasty, with the freewell you get a very pleasant and illuminate green color, besides that if you want more detail in the shadows and better dynamic range to work in postproduction the freewell is the choice and if you want a dramatic shoot, choose the polarpro , but is easy to add contrast to the freewell image in post-production than to reduce contrast and try to recover detail from the shadows in the polarpro image.

  • @studiotwentyone
    @studiotwentyone Рік тому +2

    The colours on the video is amazing. The lighting, clarity, skin tones, saturation, shadows.. All very pleasing to the eye!

  • @HaveAnother775
    @HaveAnother775 2 роки тому +1

    Really appreciate the production quality of this vid...it takes a lot of work to animate/edit a polished vid like this...great job man!

  • @Whaever_1981
    @Whaever_1981 3 роки тому +6

    Very interesting cross polarization results. Didn't expect it to be that bad with either of these brands at 16mm!

  • @JaymesMedia
    @JaymesMedia 3 роки тому +6

    I loved how the Freewell 6-9 mist look.

  • @adam.foster
    @adam.foster Рік тому

    Great review! Your insight played a pivotal part in deciding what my very first variable nd filter would be - Peter McKinnon Polar Pro it is. Great channel 👍

  • @fattybuttsbbq
    @fattybuttsbbq 2 роки тому +1

    Appreciate the thorough review man! About to order those PPs! Curious if you’re using a VND/ND filter with/without mist on the lens recording your video?

  • @CaseyHardman
    @CaseyHardman 3 роки тому +12

    Not going to lie, I really like the Freewell 6-9 the best. lol Granted I do mostly music videos and creative-style work. I have a Simmod Variable ND and a DIY mist filter if I need cleaner shots, but I'm really happy I decided to go with the Freewell 6-9!

  • @JustDushawn
    @JustDushawn 3 роки тому

    great video man :) thx for doing it..i just found ur chanell and i love it :D keep up the great work

  • @SirIronJim
    @SirIronJim 3 роки тому

    Great Video, I guess it comes down to personal taste, I've just ordered the Polarpro Edition II with 2-5 / 6-9 82mm, with 3 additional Step Plates for 62mm, 67mm, and 77mm, that combination cover most of my Nikon Z lenses, just need to find a good 112mm filter next. Wasn't really sure if I needed the Mist Filters, but figured, since I'll be doing my first wedding shoot next year, it's better to have it available if needed. Thanks again, this was a very informative video.

  • @gregmaggi01
    @gregmaggi01 3 роки тому

    Absolutely love the video, but I have a question about the lighting setup. How did you manage to not get any lens flares with the lights directly shining into the lens? (like during the opening shot at 0:00)

  • @realandylam98
    @realandylam98 3 роки тому +1

    Lots of useful content again, nice work!

  • @jonareem
    @jonareem 3 роки тому +2

    Excellent review man! I'm following you now 🤟🏽

  • @ExploringWorldYouTube
    @ExploringWorldYouTube 2 роки тому

    Hi, thanks to share the interesting video. Out of curiosity: do you not think a variable ND filer is more convenient if it has a lever on the ring to be able to move the lens more easily to shoot videos? Thank you

  • @tieNagle
    @tieNagle 3 роки тому

    Great review! Definitely looking forward to getting the PM

  • @ZekesView
    @ZekesView 3 роки тому +21

    What a solid comparison. As a PP user myself, it’s great to see how they stack up against Freewell. Well done man!!!

  • @UneBoleeDAir_Photo-Tech
    @UneBoleeDAir_Photo-Tech 3 роки тому +1

    Excellent review, thanks a lot ! 🙂

  • @BrandonTalbot
    @BrandonTalbot 2 роки тому +2

    Dunna excellent review. I think I’ll go with PP for user experience and consistency

  • @iam_rxpii
    @iam_rxpii 3 роки тому +4

    Early for another great video. I was debating on if I wanted to get the PMVND for a while now.

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  3 роки тому

      They’re pretty great! Not without their fallbacks but super handy!

  • @_stevenfoster
    @_stevenfoster 3 роки тому +5

    Dunna, well done man! I already have been experimenting with the Polar Pro 2-5 VND+Mist and after seeing this test, I think I'll pickup the 6-9.

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  3 роки тому +1

      Nice! Yeah I think the 6-9 is even better quality

  • @joshuaaruiz
    @joshuaaruiz 3 роки тому +4

    Your videos are so well made 😍

  • @arfmf
    @arfmf 3 роки тому +3

    Best review/comparison by a mile. Thanks man. I got the Freewell 2-5 only since it's what I need and I definitely can't justify $250 for the PM

  • @realjohnmak
    @realjohnmak 9 місяців тому

    Excellent comparison!!!

  • @robyneng
    @robyneng 3 роки тому +3

    Great video! As usual 😁 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

  • @BracketReviews
    @BracketReviews 3 роки тому +2

    Bravo... The thumbnail is really good. Let me enjoy the content...😊🤗🤗

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  3 роки тому

      Thank you! I hope you enjoy!

  • @JaimeGFX
    @JaimeGFX 3 роки тому +11

    I think it's even fair to mention that the polar pros hold their value very well. When everyone was selling the v1's when the signature series II came out they were still selling for over $150 US

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  3 роки тому +1

      Great point! Thanks for sharing!

  • @ManleyReviews
    @ManleyReviews 3 роки тому +13

    Just throw a couple lighting gels in front of the lens cover, give it a rough white balance, smear some vaseline on it and bam. free mist/ND filter

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  3 роки тому +5

      Lol 😂

    • @wcsdiaries
      @wcsdiaries 3 роки тому +3

      wouldnt that make the whole shot blurry though?

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  3 роки тому +2

      Yes it can for sure. It’s not really the same as a must filter but stuff like that is done to create some cool blurry effects

  • @chloejohnson9225
    @chloejohnson9225 3 роки тому +10

    You made my decision easy before you made my decision easy this time Freewell all the way.
    Just checked with Freewell below 77mm (which is what I use) it comes in their transparent magnetic case so that issue of seeing what's inside is solved & I like their look.

  • @HalfInsaneOutdoorGuy
    @HalfInsaneOutdoorGuy 3 роки тому

    how do they compare to tiffen?

  • @RivuSouravBanerjeeVideoEditor
    @RivuSouravBanerjeeVideoEditor 2 роки тому

    i want to go fr the freewell as my one nain nd filter, shoukd i go for the normal on or the one with the mist option .. pls suggest

  • @bokbokeh
    @bokbokeh Рік тому

    been using polar pro for 3 years! scratched up like crazy, going to be trying freewell next :)

  • @bokehone7211
    @bokehone7211 2 роки тому

    great review , I got a polarpro 95mm Cpl for my rf 28-70mm f/2 it won't thread on correctly it literally pops off ever had thus issue with the 95mm thread

  • @shyahkfilms
    @shyahkfilms Рік тому

    Dude you're slaying these reviews! 11pts for Canadian content!

  • @JordanSteckar
    @JordanSteckar 2 роки тому

    thanks for the tips!

  • @AllenTweed
    @AllenTweed 3 роки тому +10

    I’m a landscape waterfall guy... my solution is to not use a vnd. Just give me an nd8 and a cp and I’m a happy 850 user! But, I’ve only been doing this for 40 years so I’m sure I’m doing it wrongly! ;)

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  3 роки тому +6

      Yeah, for anything other than quick “run-n-gun” shooting I prefer solid nd’s too. VND’s are my go to for convenience and probably more so for video work than photo work. I think your way is 100% the right way!

    • @AlexSTR
      @AlexSTR 3 роки тому

      What do you think of combined ND/CPL Are they bad because it's 2v1? I didn't hear about any color issues with those

  • @41vids
    @41vids 2 роки тому

    Is it a bad idea to get the edition 1 (since they are cheaper now)? I know they made external changes, but is the quality of the actual results of photos and videos the same for both edition 1 and 2? That’s all I care about, please help!

  • @MOMENTSbyRonSonedecker
    @MOMENTSbyRonSonedecker 3 роки тому +4

    Been a Freewell fan for a while, especially their VNDs for the price/performance ratio, and just recently started using their (non-VND) Glow-mist filters, so this is an important comparison. I used their 1/8 mist filter recently on my first film project and was satisfied but admittedly have nothing to really compare it to other than "without". I can see this being a tougher decision if I end up using mist filters more. But the magnetic lens cap is a LOVE/HATE relationship for me - for the VNDs its less of an issue (more metal, beefier), but with the single NDs or CPL and now especially the super thin Glow-mists, you CANNOT get the lens cap off without pulling the filter off, too - and then the struggle of separating the two of them begins (I don't have long fingernails!). It's about my only complaint...but the words I utter each time...

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  3 роки тому

      I’ve been using their mist filters for most of my talking head bits too. Love the way the 1/8 looks. I agree it’s tough to get the cap off as well!

  • @JericTamayo
    @JericTamayo 3 роки тому

    I'm so glad I stuck with the Freewell original vnd because I can just attach any strength of promist at the back of it. Making it more consistent, and without those stop notches.

    • @eladbari
      @eladbari 2 роки тому

      yeah but don't you get vignetting when you stack 2 filters on top of each other? [the VND is as thick as 2 filters on it's own, so it's like 3 filters together]

  • @Suroky232
    @Suroky232 2 роки тому

    If people already own VND filters but would like to add a Mist diffusion, then i highly recommend the 'Kolari R Magnetic Clip-In Filters'. They offer 1/8 and 1/4 and you can use them alongside any lens filters saving you a bundle of cash.

  • @jessdixon3441
    @jessdixon3441 2 роки тому +1

    This is so beneficial. Gonna buy the freewell thru your affiliate link. You’ve earned it bro. There is so much value in this video!!! Can you do more gear comparison videos?

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  2 роки тому +1

      Awesome! Thank you! I will try to do more for sure!

  • @afnanmajeed3785
    @afnanmajeed3785 3 роки тому

    Honorable dear Thank you for your video , I am going get soon Sony A7s3 , Tamron 28-78 f 2.8 , Tamron 17-28 f 2.8 , then which ND filter size do you recommend me ..? 67 , 72, 77 or 82 mm . I am confused help me out of this please.

  • @DangLeProject92
    @DangLeProject92 3 роки тому +1

    HI Dunna. Im about to get this Freewell VND + Mist for wedding video. Wondering if lowlight during reception, If I take of the filter due to the VND make footage darker then Im not able to have Glow Effect as well. Normally will people use Mist Filter during the lowlight like reception ? Thanks

    • @backfilms1953
      @backfilms1953 2 роки тому

      U can set the vnd X mist to zero Nd. Just use the mist from it

  • @MarlonOrellana
    @MarlonOrellana 2 роки тому

    what about the new free well 7 in 1 compared to the PPPM? Would you still say the PM ones?

  • @vicluistudio3320
    @vicluistudio3320 2 роки тому

    so detail, thx

  • @robinryck2384
    @robinryck2384 3 роки тому +1

    Great video dude!!
    Another subject, do you have any issues with A7S3 files in Davinci? When I import A7S3 files in Davinci, all files become "media offline". I tried with the FX6 files and it works correctly. Do you have any tips?

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  3 роки тому +2

      The free version of resolve can’t do 10bit files unless they’re prores I believe. That might be the issue.

  • @luchespindola
    @luchespindola 2 роки тому

    thanks for that info

  • @joesheridan8135
    @joesheridan8135 3 роки тому +2

    Hi Dunna
    Great review, and you really put the breaks on my decision to purchase the Freewell Mist VNd filters. Regarding the differences in diffusion with the Freewell products, could that be to do with those being pre release versions? Also, did you reach out to Freewell to make this issue known to them? Thank you.

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  3 роки тому +1

      Hey! I don’t believe these are pre release versions as far as I’m aware. And when I released the video, I got an email from freewell saying thanks for the suggestions and that they would take the comments into consideration for the future. I’m not sure whether that means future iterations of this filter or for other filters.

    • @joesheridan8135
      @joesheridan8135 3 роки тому +1

      @@dunnadidit Ok thank you for explaining that. It’s a shame you are the only person to mention this issue.

    • @joesheridan8135
      @joesheridan8135 3 роки тому

      Also, do you have an email contact that you wouldn't mind sharing so I could contact them directly myself? Thanks.

  • @JasonLorette
    @JasonLorette 3 роки тому +2

    Great comparison, love how the PP/PM stuff works/looks, just can't afford them.

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  3 роки тому +2

      I would take a guess that you're not alone there.

    • @JasonLorette
      @JasonLorette 3 роки тому +1

      @@dunnadidit - indeed!

  • @TrueNorf
    @TrueNorf 3 роки тому +1

    Magnets, coffee and hazy BOKEH!!! All epic things, Dunna! Smashed it again! Like you, I think I would save my coin for the PolarPro Peter McKinnon Edition ii Variable ND Mist Filter. Awesome, AWESOME review...watched it twice! 😁👍🏾

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  3 роки тому +1

      Haha this is a very DUNNA review isn't it lol.

    • @TrueNorf
      @TrueNorf 3 роки тому +1

      @@dunnadidit IKR!! 😂

  • @filipinodood4
    @filipinodood4 3 роки тому +1

    So I mostly do automotive photography and my main lens is now the new 35mm f/1.4 GM. Which stop would suit me better with the polar pro PM? 2-5 or the 6-9?

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  3 роки тому

      Honestly, for photography... you might want to look into solid nd’s. But if you’re set on a vnd, go 6-9 stop.

  • @itsxris
    @itsxris 3 роки тому +3

    I personally like the PP 2-5 and FW 6-9 combo

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  3 роки тому +5

      Interesting! If I was mixing and matching I would probably go the opposite way, FW2-5 and PP 6-9

  • @sumyintmyatnobel1952
    @sumyintmyatnobel1952 3 роки тому +1

    hey this is unrelated but do u see a new sony apsc camera coming out?

  • @vaskoobscura_
    @vaskoobscura_ 3 роки тому +1

    You're right it is complicated. On one hand the functionality is better on PP. But on the other hand you're paying double for minimal mist effect. In the backlit shots it's hard to tell you even had a $250 filter on the camera. So in that situation the filter is not worth the money. FW looks a little over misted. The review would have been a ton better if you put in the time showing comparisons of these filters in more than just 3 setups especially for a comparison that is so "complicated" I'm thumbs upping just the same but just saying would have been nice to get more examples.

  • @PaulFeinberg
    @PaulFeinberg 3 роки тому +1

    Very good detailed review as always......wow I don't like that the mist doesn't match. Very odd. Not sure which one I would choose.....I am cheap, but rather spend more money to get what I would want. Thats a hard one. I would lean more Polar Pro on this one. Good video, makes someone think long and hard on this one.

  • @jurvangelder3323
    @jurvangelder3323 3 місяці тому

    Can I use these mist filters inside? Do I have to bring to ISO up to fix the darkness of the nd filter?

  • @Ggosciu
    @Ggosciu 2 роки тому

    yoo, in bright daylight section of the vid - imo there was no need for nd filter ? 'no filter' looked just fine.
    Let's go on to the questions part: I've got gh4 with 58mm main lens (the other one is 52mm) its micro 4/3 sensor, I'm lookin to buy variable nd filter. Should I go with freewell or PolarPro, the PolarPro one is starting from 67 so I need step up rings - any downsizes of that option? vignetting? FOV? 52 to 67 is a lot I guess.

  • @kensutanza
    @kensutanza 3 роки тому +1

    Wondering if the mist effect get amplified if we stack either those two filters with something like black promist or cinebloom 🤔🤔🤔

  • @enricoceliz
    @enricoceliz 3 роки тому +2

    This is not about the filter but as I saw your progress with your channel, I see that you have some music and other things on your earlier videos. What made you decide to go into the camera (Photography and Videography) content-wise? (I currently have this problem) not sure if I should just do all the topics I want in my channel like music, film, tech, or just stick to one genre?

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  3 роки тому +1

      Thank you so much! Honestly, I was looking for something other than my full time job to get into (I’m a music producer/recording engineer full time). I picked up a camera and the rest is history haha.

  • @jodywaddle4448
    @jodywaddle4448 3 роки тому +1

    I kept trying to read the sign but my old eyes wouldn't do the last 2 lines. Love having options, plus something to save for.

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  3 роки тому +1

      Haha the irony of that statement is so awesome lol. Thanks for watching Jody!

    • @Adventure_Together
      @Adventure_Together 3 роки тому +1

      If you can
      read this
      I need more
      Bokeh

  • @animaxxx4429
    @animaxxx4429 3 роки тому +2

    Hey man , loved comparison. Please test K&F CPL and ND too. 🙏🏻

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  3 роки тому +1

      I’ll keep it in mind!

    • @animaxxx4429
      @animaxxx4429 3 роки тому +1

      @@dunnadidit Thanks. A budget filters guide would be great as not everyone have that kinda money for filters or even lenses worth these pricey filters. 🙏🏻❤️

  • @CallMeRabbitzUSVI
    @CallMeRabbitzUSVI 3 роки тому +6

    In conclusion if you want the best image use a separate diffusion filter and separate vnd since it give you more control over your haze effect and Exposure levels

    • @juanantonio358
      @juanantonio358 2 роки тому

      Would u help me on that? I wanna use the moment cinebloom diffusion with a farewell vnd. How does that work? 🥲 (or who should i watch for this)

  • @HDvids101
    @HDvids101 3 роки тому

    The Dunna Filter ... now that is worth waiting for :-)

  • @stianevensen514
    @stianevensen514 3 роки тому +1

    Can you make a video of reviewing the new sigma 28-70mm 2.8? I do realy like your reviews more then others.

  • @chrisrock340
    @chrisrock340 3 роки тому +7

    To my eye, I feel like the Polar Pro is the clear choice (no pun intended). I just wish it wasn't so dang expensive.

  • @foursite
    @foursite 2 роки тому +1

    So what was so complicated to choose earlier in the video?

  • @MatthewHyatt
    @MatthewHyatt Рік тому +1

    So the PP's use more of a glimmer glass than pro mist look. Very good review, broski!

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  Рік тому +1

      It definitely is a bit of a different look from the pro mist stuff.

  • @hoodaffairstv
    @hoodaffairstv 3 роки тому +1

    what lens was this test done on

  • @Vario125HID
    @Vario125HID 2 роки тому

    thank you very much

  • @Issx07
    @Issx07 3 роки тому

    Have you done a review, on the sigma 35mm 1.4 art?? Im in the market for one and want a pro opinion😅

  • @marielichtblick
    @marielichtblick 3 роки тому +1

    Thanks for this Great comparisson.... Think it will be the polar pro for me 😀

  • @wmosleycr7
    @wmosleycr7 3 роки тому +1

    Your previous video had me sold on free well. This video has me completely sold on polar pro.

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  3 роки тому

      Haha that’s pretty much the conclusions I came to as well for the two different types of filter.

    • @wmosleycr7
      @wmosleycr7 3 роки тому +1

      @@dunnadidit I really liked the price of the VND from freewell plus their performance was so close to polarpro. It was a nobrainer. But the case and putting on the filter on a lens makes up for the price. I’d rather have a clean filter that’s easier to put on and put away.

  • @MrDonuts10
    @MrDonuts10 3 роки тому +1

    This might be a dumb question but here goes.
    So the new polar pro Peter M filters make the images softer rather than keeping the sharpness?
    I have his first one which is the 2-5 stop one and I mainly got it for long expos during the day, such as waterfalls, etc.
    I recently dropped it and may or may not need to replace it. I don’t want my images to be soft, so that being said should I avoid the new polar pro Peter M filters?
    I honestly don’t get why anyone Would want soft images over sharpness.
    Style I guess?

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  3 роки тому

      Hi there hi there!
      Not a dumb question at all. Though it’s a bit complicated. They do a good job not to lose any image quality necessarily but it does give a bit of softening in certain situations by adding halation around bright light sources. It’s more of a “haze” than anything.
      And yes you nailed it... style. It looks a bit more “filmic” if your image isn’t ridiculously sharp because digital formats and modern lenses are getting sharper and sharper all the time.
      All that being said. The petermckinnon version 2 filters come in a mist version as well as a non mist version. So if you wanted the great quality of the PMVND, the new features like the case and such, but not the soft mist effect... they’ve got those! I think I may have even left a link in the description.

  • @alchemist_x79
    @alchemist_x79 3 роки тому +1

    By and large, I’m not a fan of the diffusion effect to begin with so these aren’t aimed at me but to my eyes... I liked the more controlled look of the PP (giggity) in the studio test shots, but strangely enough I liked the FW better for the desk shots. Made it look like flaring from the sun just out of frame which I love when used right.
    If any of that made sense lol

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  3 роки тому

      Haha I totally get that you’re saying! It’s definitely not for all the time and sometimes you might want a lot of it, but other times you might just want a little.

  • @iamcolinclark
    @iamcolinclark 3 роки тому +20

    am I crazy or does it look like the PP literally has almost no diffusion happening when compared to the freewell. glad I didnt drop 800 bucks to get that effect.

    • @RamenKing2023
      @RamenKing2023 2 роки тому +5

      Yeah because paying $800 for something that's $450 when you buy both filters together would be crazy.

  • @Pharesm
    @Pharesm 2 роки тому +1

    PolarPro brings up the black really well, but its weak on halation.
    Just to put this issue to rest: Some hairspray to the sensor should alleviate all the hairy filter stacking issues.

    • @motorcycle-man
      @motorcycle-man Рік тому

      I feel like that introduces a entirely different problem but sure.

  • @Brandonatom
    @Brandonatom 2 роки тому +2

    I got a samyang 18mm 2.8, in the market for a first time filter but unsure of what I’m looking for.

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  2 роки тому

      Check out the new freewell system. ua-cam.com/video/EKIDYrcwADg/v-deo.html

  • @sncrdcr
    @sncrdcr 2 роки тому +4

    Had a really bad time with Freewell. 2-5 operated in reverse, so 2 was the darkest and 5 was the brightest. Didn’t notice until past the return window, and Freewell support said they’ve “never heard of this before” and to mail it to their factory in China for further review. Fun times.

    • @JamieFenn
      @JamieFenn Рік тому +7

      Sounds like you had the filter on backwards..

    • @MenOfArms
      @MenOfArms Рік тому

      😂

    • @sncrdcr
      @sncrdcr Рік тому

      Doh! Shoulda thought of that! 🙄

  • @biohazard2030
    @biohazard2030 2 роки тому

    I have the 82mm Polar pro regular 2-5 VND. I use that on my sigma 24-70 lens (however I’m contemplating on getting the mist as well now). But I’m really looking for a decent ND filter for my iPhone 13 pro max and future 67mm lenses I get but I’m sorry I’m not about to pay $249 for 1 filter for my phone 📱. Looks like
    Freewell it is!

  • @KZLR
    @KZLR 3 роки тому +1

    Strongly suggest going with the Schneider True-Match Vari-ND MKII Variable Neutral Density Filter (82mm)

  • @MossCoveredBonez
    @MossCoveredBonez 3 роки тому +3

    I've heard of an issue with windshields when it comes to the polarpro. From what I saw it turns certain types of glass yellow, supposedly the same issue with the polar pro basecamp

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  3 роки тому +1

      Windshields?
      Oooooooohhhh I see what you mean, like shooting through a windshield? There will be a certain amount of polarization happening with any polarized glass like that since VND’s use polarizers to work. Shooting screens of your electronic devices may also be an issue.

  • @Kyle_McQ
    @Kyle_McQ 3 роки тому +1

    I am confident that a coffee brewing/drinking stream would go over reasonably well

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  3 роки тому +1

      Haha you want me to livestream making coffee? That kinda sounds awesome... for me

  • @guystokes454
    @guystokes454 3 роки тому +1

    Have you tried the Moment filters on your camera lenses yet?

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  3 роки тому

      If you’re referring to the VND’s... I have! Check out my other video comparing them to the freewell and PolarPro. ua-cam.com/video/6x8UFTlxbOc/v-deo.html

    • @guystokes454
      @guystokes454 3 роки тому

      @@dunnadidit cool thanks! I will check out that video.

  • @cinemasterproductions6940
    @cinemasterproductions6940 3 роки тому

    Dunna, Great comparison. Completely agree with you. To many inconsistency and swing issues with the Freewell. In my world, less post work the better. Save up and get the better product, many times it comes down to (said at the risk of offending others) garbage in - garbage out. The one or two times you may be trying to capture the Freewell look as an artistic perspective, simply is not worth the trade off of the many positives the PolarPro filters offer. As you said, Freewell offers some very good uses to be considered. Ultimately we are all our own creators, what works for one may not be good for the other. Again, great review which gives the viewer a concrete and fair perspective. Thank you. PS I prefer solid ND filters.

  • @LukeGeeTravels
    @LukeGeeTravels 3 роки тому +1

    What are the odds that I broke my nd filters this past weekend and you make this video now! Haha

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  3 роки тому

      Haha I promise I’m not doing any voodoo on you!

    • @jeanlue
      @jeanlue 3 роки тому

      I was thinking the same thing

  • @63MacGuy
    @63MacGuy 3 роки тому +2

    I’m thinking it might be better to get a separate mist filter. I can’t really use the ND filter in low light / indoors.

    • @ManleyReviews
      @ManleyReviews 3 роки тому +1

      Agreed. I ordered a 1/8 to put behind my VND. Don't know why you would want mist baked in to that

    • @twalker294
      @twalker294 3 роки тому +1

      @@ManleyReviews using two filters can cause odd reflections and lens flare between the two pieces of glass. It can also cause more vignetting since you are stacking filters.

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  3 роки тому

      @twalker294 nailed it. Stacking filters can cause some unwanted effects. That said... so do VND's in general so its all about tradeoffs and convenience.

    • @JimRobinson-colors
      @JimRobinson-colors 3 роки тому

      @@twalker294 Don't these actually stack?

    • @backfilms1953
      @backfilms1953 2 роки тому

      You can use the variable Nd mist filter being set to no nd at all to get the mist only

  • @authenticarkansas
    @authenticarkansas 3 роки тому +16

    This was a great comparison. I'm typically not much of a mist filter fan, but for my eyes that Polar Pro clearly stood out, which makes my wallet very, very sad.

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  3 роки тому

      Thanks so much! I totally hear you haha.

  • @JosePotes
    @JosePotes 3 роки тому

    great quality vid!!! subscribeD!!!

  • @nayrb3593
    @nayrb3593 3 роки тому +1

    Hi sir what would you recommend for me im into photography/video automotive which filter is the best?

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  3 роки тому +1

      You may want to look into CPL filters for cutting the glare on your cars

    • @nayrb3593
      @nayrb3593 3 роки тому

      @@dunnadidit thanks for the reply and lastly do you think the peter mckinnon singature 2 also cut the glare ?

  • @Soul_Visuals_Photography
    @Soul_Visuals_Photography 3 роки тому +2

    I absolutely LOVE my Freewell system.

  • @nicholaswolle
    @nicholaswolle 3 роки тому +2

    Thanks for this awesome comparison Dunna! One suggestion I would make is taking a silver sharpie and labeling the freewell cases so you don't have to check every time you need one.

    • @63MacGuy
      @63MacGuy 3 роки тому +1

      Or label maker

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  3 роки тому +1

      Oh you best believe I got that label maker on LOCK!

    • @AveryCaudill
      @AveryCaudill 3 роки тому +1

      this^^ I use the same method on a set of vintage lenses with step up rings and matching lens caps, saves so much time

  • @ShaneKroening
    @ShaneKroening 3 роки тому +3

    oh man, I watched this video hoping you were going to tell me that the Freewell filter would be the way to go only to realize that you and I both knew the whole time the PolarPro was the way to go!

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  3 роки тому +1

      Haha have you seen my previous VND comparison... you might get more of what you want lol.

    • @ShaneKroening
      @ShaneKroening 3 роки тому

      @@dunnadidit I'll have to check it out! Thanks!

  • @macchoudhry5868
    @macchoudhry5868 9 місяців тому

    What about JJC vs Peter McKinnon Filters?

  • @laurencohn3971
    @laurencohn3971 Рік тому +1

    Beware of the Freewell ND - I bought a set in the 82mm size, and they were wonderful. I bought them because of the neat stops (Haptic Feedback) when you get to the various ND settings as well as the hard stop at the end. The "haptic feedback" along with the excellent color and build quality were what made me decide to buy a second set in 67mm.
    BEWARE.
    You will NOT get the "haptic feedback" in the 67mm size which was one of the selling points of these ND filters. I reached out to Freewell's customer service as to why, and here is what they said - "Thanks for your message. They are exactly as it says on the box HARD STOP. Hard stop means that it should not go beyond 5 & 9 stops thats precisely what it does. What you are referring to is HAPTIC FEEDBACK which we have recently added in some of the products to see the feedback; it has not been applied to all the sizes & all the filters, nor are we claiming on the product."
    So a major selling point for these filters turns out to be a GAMBLE as to which ones have the "haptic feedback" or not. One star for misleading/omission of a critical feature of these ND filters.

  • @JayLippman
    @JayLippman 3 роки тому +5

    I'm one of those weird people who actually prefers to keep diffusion and ND on separate filters, mostly because I don't always want diffusion in my shot. Currently I have the Tiffen variable ND and the 1/4 Black Pro Mist. That being said, if I ever change my mind about that, I'll be going with the Polar Pro I think.

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  3 роки тому +2

      I don’t think that’s strange actually. I have both systems. There’s pros and cons of course, more stacked pieces of glass can also cause issues but allows for more control. The VND version has convenience but more classic VND issues lol.

  • @alanlafferty6593
    @alanlafferty6593 3 роки тому

    Good video

  • @BrianSellers
    @BrianSellers 3 роки тому +2

    Love the sign! Very Spaceballsy... 😂👍

  • @jambononi
    @jambononi 3 місяці тому

    Surely you don't want the mist and nd combined because depending on the job you lose mist when you don't need nd or get stuck with mist if you just need exposure change. Surely staking filters is a must?

  • @gangs0846
    @gangs0846 2 місяці тому

    Which regular nd filter is better? Freewell or Polarpro

  • @ekphotography
    @ekphotography 3 роки тому +1

    Thanks, your links to the Peter filter on amazon don't work. And the Freewell is only slightly cheaper which makes the Peter one a more secure buy I would imagine.. I prefer adding pro mist filter when it is necessary and not permanently on my VND filter.. But what ever suits your needs..

    • @dunnadidit
      @dunnadidit  3 роки тому +1

      Hey! I just checked the link and it’s working okay on my end... though amazon Canada doesn’t seem to have any of the mist ones and b&h might be in the same spot right now. What are you seeing on your end!
      I agree with you for sure about wanting to have that control. I think that’s why I prefer the PP version... it’s a lot more subtle so I don’t mind using it a bit more freely.