There’s Lots of Space Between the Radical Left and the Radical Right
Вставка
- Опубліковано 5 вер 2024
- Watch the full lecture - • Lecture and Q&A with J...
Dr. Peterson's extensive catalog is available now on DailyWire+: utm.io/ueSFn
// SUPPORT THIS CHANNEL //
Premium Podcast - jordanbpeterso...
Newsletter: linktr.ee/DrJo...
Donations: jordanbpeterso...
// COURSES //
Discovering Personality: jordanbpeterso...
Self Authoring Suite: selfauthoring.com
Understand Myself (personality test): understandmyse...
// BOOKS //
Beyond Order: 12 More Rules for Life: jordanbpeterso...
12 Rules for Life: An Antidote to Chaos: jordanbpeterso....
Maps of Meaning: The Architecture of Belief: jordanbpeterso....
// LINKS //
Website: jordanbpeterso...
Events: jordanbpeterso...
Blog: jordanbpeterso...
Podcast: jordanbpeterso...
// SOCIAL //
Twitter: / jordanbpeterson
Instagram: / jordan.b.peterson
Facebook: / drjordanpeterson
#JordanPeterson #JordanBPeterson #DrJordanPeterson #DrJordanBPeterson #DailyWirePlus #radicalism #leftvsright #lafayette #Q&A #millsseries #politics
Incredible how he just sits through two minutes of baseless slander and then dismantles it without getting emotionally riled up because he's heard the same tune a million times before. Lol
Ideological possession; a machine on their heads being cranked to regurgitate the same message; no original thought or personal knowledge. (JP is too wise for the Left.)
I have so much appreciation for Jordan Peterson and his willingness to step into the breach. Humanity needs this man, and I am forever grateful for his ability to persevere in the face of constant, ridiculous attacks.
Agreed
I honestly think from experience he's like most, smart in ways, not in others. Shows our need for others. He need to find out who his master is before he can decide what to do about it.
Money owns everyone it's designed to.
Information is their miracle spell on us, it's also the key to our exit from the money matrix. Lot of people looking at time and skills banks of ourselves , without the USURPED by bankers pyramidal power structures. Our time and skills equally valued is our banks. The goods and services based on the time it takes us to produce them is the time valued benefits, so we all work equally benefited regardless the position, no boss and employee, just a collective of workers working for each other.
It's admirable how Dr. J. Peterson constantly fights for human improvement in detriment of his health and personal life. All my gratitude for this effort and hope some day people will really listen to what he has to say and follow his advice. Admirable indeed 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻✨️🤗
This man and his character , upright and just as it is, has been a model for me long before I even saw him..
It is his character and the very existence of it that is great in this automaton plague.
Jordan is a brilliant and beautiful human. The world is a better place because of his contributions to humanity. He is loved, admired and respected by millions. He is the main reason I’m on UA-cam. Thank you, Jordan. ✝️❤️
The Beatles answered this question: “But when you talk about destruction…” people who advocate for just smashing things rather than building structures to nurture those left at the bottom.
He will bring us together.
Not with the rhetoric of daily wire jordan. He’s gone off the rails.
It takes all to make enough effort together.
@@luck3yp0rk93 sad to hear that
Tyk 7757-;!"
Nothing but respect and admiration for this man. I enjoy the way that Dr. Peterson engages in thoughtful, and meaningful conversation. He doesn't get mad, he doesn't lose control. He chooses his words carefully, and says what he means. Legend.
Sadly we live in a world where we are raising
generations of truth-deniers. Young people have been so babied in to realms of denial of truth, so much so that they are infuriated when responsibility is placed upon them.
Peterson is not a divisive person, in the slightest. I can’t understand the thought process of the people that wrote that shite about it.
Very helpful advice, distancing yourself from radicals is crucial. You should probably fight harder against extremists and radicals on your side, than against the ones on the opposing side.
I don’t see radicals on the Right. Not anywhere close to the -in our faces radical left, and daily too. The FBI just pulled agents off of incredibly important investigations to stop child sex trafficking and told to go find Conservatives that can be arrested for “Radicalism”, according to the FBI whistleblower that was fired last week even with recent whistleblower laws, and protections. A President’s private residence was just raided and the left is cheering. 100% fact that Trump will not be found to have committed and crimes though we expect him to be charged so that they can drag their assault on the Conservatives out as long as possible. There is no comparable radicalism on the right compared to the NEW LEFT.
Wow. Those letters at the beginning show how these students predicate their arguments off of pure fallacy. Are they that lacking in the history of our country and culture? Where are they coming from and what is their basis for these beliefs? That is a sincere question. Is it any wonder that we are so divided?
There's a Lot of Difference between the Far Left today and what I used to consider Left/Liberal. Peterson is NOT any of the things this anonymous Marxist student claims.
“DO BETTER!” 😂
Is it the natural PERSON talking, or is it the IDEOLOGY? That is deep, seriously deep. Thank you.
One of the most cited physiologists in the history of man. A man with an astounding career. He’s devoted his life to knowledge and the inner workings of the human mind. And people don’t even want to hear what he has to say? Because sometimes he hurts your feelings? Preposterous. You should be uncomfortable at all times. You should listen to the words you recoil from. Only a trained communist would act hurt or damaged because someone disagrees with you.
A hallmark of liberal thinking is that humans are perfectible. Thomas Sowell calls this the “unconstrained vision.” I call it the quest for liberation (in a literal sense; liberated from all forms of opposition, internal and external). Thus, perhaps the reason that the Left cannot identify their boundary (a “constrained vision”) is that they see themselves as on a path toward perfection. More is always better, closer to perfection. “Too far” would mean that their ultimate goal is incorrect and their “vision” is wrong.
When one only sees their own narrow view all they see is their own perspective. There is something worth listening here despite my critiques of him on defining who is reasonable (note, question that within myself a lot).
Such a brilliant man 💚
9:14 Watch the man on the right, Brandon Van Dyck (it took me 10 minutes to find his name), do something we've probably all experienced from listening to Dr. Peterson when he says something we've never heard before and we immediately know it's exactly right.
When Dr. Peterson explains a technical reason the left have trouble drawing boundaries, Brandon turns away, looks up, and his face basically goes, "Not bad." He the lowers his head and begins nodding along to the points Dr. Peterson is making. Before that he was in the same position looking right at Dr. Peterson for at least 3 minutes, maybe longer. I've lost count of how many mini-epiphany moments I've had while listening to Dr. Peterson.
So many people love and respect this man for good reason he has absolutely earned it and then some!
One of the biggest lies in contemporary political discussion is the notion that national socialism and fascism were right-wing. National socialism and fascism were collectivist and revolutionary, and those are left-wing characteristics. Mussolini used to be a revolutionary socialist until during ww1 he decided that somebodies nationality was more important than somebodies class membership. Hitler replaced class warfare with race warfare: different collective, same collectivist ideology. Fascism, communism, and national socialism are closer to each other than to real right-wing movements. The only difference is that they specify their central collective differently: proletariat class for communists, nation for fascists, and race for national socialists.
The only reason that fascism and national socialism are called right-wing nowadays is that the communists labeled them as such, to smear their competition in the struggle for which ideology is the true collectivist ideology.
If you need to dislike this great man,ok. But, he's not hurting anyone,just getting you thinking. If he offends you,or,hurts your feelings,tough shit☘️🖕🥂🖤
I will never understand how truth and critical thinking is considered "hate" just because it hurts your feelings.
Unfortunatly that line, like established on the right, won’t come into view until an awful tragedy that mirrors WW2.
There is a huge difference between equality of opportunity and equality of outcome. I support equality of opportunity and believe there is a lot of work that could be done. I also consider myself a moderate leaning towards liberal. Equal outcome is a society deadend for many reasons built into human behavior that are not going to change anytime soon.
1:00 I like how the letter lists all these "insidious" things Jordan believes, and I'm like, 'Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. And?'
Though, it's actually refreshing they managed to be so close to accurate.
"Do better" is one of the more condescending, obnoxious things that people like to say nowadays. Up there with "triggered". People suck sometimes.
Let's just say the radical right has a smaller record of violence.
hitler agrees
@@m1nd654 his ideology was leftist in nature. And also a certain region in Asia had a higher number.
@@m1nd654 Hitler’s ideologies are leftist. Same with Stalin and Lenin.
@@m1nd654 If you have to reach back to the 1940s to come up with an example, I think you just made his point
dw the right has the violence spread out more evenly across it
JP often raises the question, 'Where do we draw the line?' From what I gather, he aims to establish that line as "equity." However, I find myself wanting to create a mirror of the right's racial superiority by considering class superiority the left's line, instead. Nowadays, the radical left often praises the lower class without question and even advocates for the demise of the upper classes, both as individuals and as a collective.
narrowly defined community good before the individual suffering experienced by the majority of the group = extreme right?
undefined rights of the symbolic individual before the individual suffering experienced by the majority of the group = extreme left?
Wow, that students introduction gave JBP a lot of… does that mean the list, is what they want JBP to actually support. Sounds like another misinformed child with a long way still to go in life. It is very kind of JBP to continually answer the same questions. No matter how repetitively insane they are.
I consider myself a man of the far right. In some instances, yes, the far right and the far left have similar, if not identical, ideas and goals, but the key difference comes down to intent and motivation.
I will criticise the thumbnail pic. There's no gap between the left and right. The solid is the middle. There's a chasm at either end. Life taught me that.
Define both. Because its not clear that woke folks and Bernie sanders supporters are the same crowd (they do overlap but they are distinct). Also its not clear what he means by the far right, most folks would consider someone who wants to return to 2nd term Obama's budget as far right, despite the fact that is probably a very reasonable proposition for the long term stability of our currency and government.
Why not Clinton's 2nd term budget.
Most on the far left consider that there is no left wing party in the US, and "Bernie and the Wokes" (band name, anyone? 😝) are actually right wing.
How do you even have a conversation with someone like that?
There is very little harmony between Freedom,,,, and Force. The space between them is the degree to which force should be applied,, and to whom.
Please show me a moderate, elected Democrat in America right now. Just 1.
Listening to someone assume shyte about u and never had a Convo or critical analysis of ur behavior, is the chat buzz of ideologues possessed by demons. Touché Mr. P. TOUCHÉ
I don't think it's nearly as complicated as you say.
Force.
If your idea has merit, it won't require force to get people to agree.
It's really that simple.
People can disagree about a great many things, and still have a functioning society. But when one side begins to believe that they're so right that they can compel others to agree with them, the topic no longer matters.
You're wrong.
This might very well be your Best explanation of political importance as a definition from far right to far left.
What on earth is wrong with students uttering such absolute disdain for free open debate - and in a university of all places, I mean this is completely mental!
This is pretty good
Information doesn't travel in all directions at the same speed, speaking of different perceptions.
2:34, 6:19
Bigger the space, bigger the party!)
love it.
"Where do you cross the line on the left"? It's easy. It's when you claim that people are a product of environment ONLY and by controlling the environment, you can shape people without any limit. Infinite malleability.
What exactly does a radical right believe in? Freedom? Less government? Leave children alone? Stop wars? Close the boarder? Freedom to protect yourself and home? Freedom to practice religion?
None of these things you mention are radical right IMO.
Radical right has two forms basically - 1st is extreme libertarian anarchism (sovereign citizen bullshit, way off the deep end of personal freedom and completely unregulated capitalism and let the buyer beware and if a product is killing people the market will sort it out by word of mouth not to buy it among the survivors.) 2nd is classic nationalist-racial Fascism, which boils down to a retread of ancient tribalism. Anyone of our tribe must contribute to the success of the tribe first. Our tribe and its members are the people who matter, or who even are "people" at all. Other tribes exist only as threats we need to defeat and to be conquered, raped, enslaved and ultimately exterminated because this is the only way we guarantee the permanent dominance of our tribe.)
You can disagree with Peterson, but calling him stupid is just obviously wrong.
7:30 someone put the NPC on the right of the interview on pause
but we cannot allow it to go on.. help us please.. it is terrifying
"Diversity, who's against that" Me, it's antiwhite.
Do you prefer a planet that's only populated with whites?
What doesn't quite come across with the student criticism s is that they must have been written using a voice-to-text application. It's far too difficult to type while lying down while spastically flailing around, stomping your feet and pounding your fists on the floor. I know. I've tried. Also, the original text, before translation wad, " WAAAAA!, WAAAA!, MOMMY, THE MAN IS BEING MEAN TO ME!"
I don't agree with all of your ideas, especially after your more recent turn towards Daily wire, it looks like some of the previous strong logic and reasoning behind the ideas is lost. BUT I think you are very reasonable person as a whole and everything in this video is absolutely spot on.
Daily Mail, or Daily Wire?
@@michaelsorensen7567 thanks, my bad, I get these two names confused very easily
@@siarametanal4317 np, just had me confused.
Out of curiosity, do you have examples of "strong logic and reasoning behind the ideas is lost"?
If you are going to slander someone who is doing you the privilege of bringing some reasonability to your campus, you should at least do your homework and realize he could disassemble your ill-formed argument easily and tactfully so you don't waste his time. DO BETTER
Also "Lots of Space" between the ears of the most vocal proponents of both groups.
Ergo: fix your own shit....
Rule number: something or other.
Could someone elaborate for me what is a boundary-dissolving type? I'm not familiar with the term.
People who are high in trait openness as opposed to conscientiousness.
To put it simply, a right winger might say, the exception proves the rule, a left winger would say the exception breaks the rule.
The more left-wing you get, the less exceptions you need before you toss out a rule. To the point that even a single exception out of 15 billion examples is enough to discard the rule.
The more right wing you get, the more exceptions you need to justify disregarding the rule. To the point that if only one case out of 15 billion examples follows a rule, the rule is still valid.
There are *far* more people on the left-side of that equation than on the right, to the point, that it very well might be the case that there *is* only one person who believes rules apply to everyone even if literally all examples but one disagree with the rule. On the other hand, there are likely millions of people who believe a single counter-example disproves a rule.
@@SirSpence99 Thanks.
Perhaps …… When the humanity of people (psychological integrity) is disregarded in pursuit of ideological equity = lost their way - I am not sure racial discrimination is a clear enough marker - I think it is more to do with the percentage of the population that can pursue their individuality - there is a critical mass where right politics collapses in on its self. Same goes for left - in essence it is the same thing - percentage of people that can experience their essential humanity in all its colour
Well, there is *also* the problem that the Nazis weren't actually right-wing. They themselves said they were following a third path and not only did their core ideology come directly from Socialism (literally, the argument was that they *wanted* equity but the Jews were stopping it from happening and that if their race was the only race, communism would spontaneously appear) so did Fascism. Mussolini was a card carrying Socialist and said that Fascism was the only way to bring about Socialism because Socialists were too dishonest.
In modern day, that is, *after* world war 2, western academics redefined "right wing" to mean "focused on race" and "nationalist" when historically, it had no relation to either. Anyone who thinks the Communists of China *weren't* nationalistic hasn't looked into their beliefs. This, literally, is why Communists get away with "that wasn't real socialism" because they realized they could avoid being associated with bad things by redefining their opponents to be those bad things.
That to say, I agree with you sort of. I think, perhaps, the only clear marker is that ideology that rejects the reasonableness of all other ideologies.
Given that the modern left does *not* allow one to pursue their own individuality unless it is abnormal, I find that to be a questionable marker for the right.
Perhaps a better one for the right would be not allowing people to transcend hierarchies, that is, if you were born a noble, you cannot not *lose* your status as a noble and if you were born a peasant, you can't become a noble.
On the right, the inverse of that, the rejection of *all* hierarchies, especially to the point of rejecting meritocracy.
I think the point is the right supposedly champions individuality - and the tendency in extremism is that this reverses and disallows individuality in increasing sections of society. Equity vs individuality - extremism does not hold to main tenet for large majority of people - what is the critical mass when the main tenet does not hold
What is a parasite thinker?
7:05
the "university" is only a place to plunge neck deep in dept for very long time, no other result come out of college that worth it, the knowledge and skills after 4 years of higher education could be acquired way easier and cheaper through self learning via text books and reading a lot and good self discipline, many programs are like this (some are not like medicine). in future less and less people will/can afford to go to college
what a sad soul making such judgements on a man like Jordan Peterson same happened to Jesus they hated him bc he was right and juste.❤☦ God bless,
I just want to talk to people without them cowering behind "dog whistle!" just because you didn't say what they believe you think.
Nazi's are Leftists, not "on the Right," as Dr Peterson purports. Yes Nazi's are ever so slightly right of Communists, but both are on the far-Left compared to any other governing system. That Dr Peterson doesn't know that after all these years on the political stage makes one wonder about his cognitive ability to learn?
Eh, he still spouts Hohocause like it was real, so he either didn't try learning truth or he just doesn't want to be banned from most platforms... AKA He is conforming.
Much as I appreciate Peterson, I have come to the conclusion that the dichotomy between Right and Left is false at the extremes..
When you discard the cosmetic differences - the slogans and symbols - there is almost no difference between the Nazis and the Communists. The implication is that either WW2 was primarily caused by the Left, or we have no adequate definition of “Right”, so what are we talking about? A False Dichotomy is a logical fallacy.
The similarities are obvious.
Both are run by oligarchies, usually called “parties”.
Both justify their oligarchy by promoting conflict between identity-groups. (The evidence that there is some kind of fundamental difference between grouping people by race and doing so by class, religion, sex or “gender” is weak)
Both demand complete control by the State Oligarchy of Production, Distribution and Exchange ( the titular names of the “owners” are irrelevant, because the owners will do what they are bloody well told).
Both maintain their control by fear and military/police power.
Keep in mind that Socialism has an obvious history of racism. Stalin had obvious racist and nationalist policies. The Chinese Communists are currently engaged in race-based discrimination against the Uighers, and what is the BLM movement other than racist?
Replace money used to control for time used to produce. Think outside the enslavement apparatus system.
In the middle of that space is God ...of your servitude to the one owns both the law supporting it, and the apparatus, money.
Money owns everyone it's designed to.
Information is their miracle spell on us, it's also the key to our exit from the money matrix. Lot of people looking at time and skills banks of ourselves , without the USURPED by bankers pyramidal power structures. Our time and skills equally valued is our banks. The goods and services based on the time it takes us to produce them is the time valued benefits, so we all work equally benefited regardless the position, no boss and employee, just a collective of workers working for each other.
But that doesn't matter at all, Pescador de Hombres. They STILL have the COMMON DENOMINATOR: RADICAL. It makes NO DIFFERENCE.
likely, valid markers are ideologies that go against nature, especially human nature... just like racial superiority is not a fact of nature... so for the left it could indeed be an ideology that attempts to establish equality of outcomes... but to equate that with a will for equity is not a valid representation in my view...
a will for equity in its meaning of « justice, fairness, and impartiality » certainly does not imply the will for equality of outcomes... rather, it seems that the aim there is merely to take the artificial challenges, for instance those which are maintained through traditions of prejudice, out of the way of the individual, so that the necessary challenges that the collectivity is facing can be addressed more efficiently...
a will for equity in its meaning of « equality » does not necessarily imply the will to level hierarchies of competence, and enforce equality outcomes... for instance, equality of opportunity can actually help some people, who have skill and disposition for excellence but who find themselves in unfavorable circumstances, to actually emerge and reach the level of excellence they have the ability to reach, and would otherwise possibly never reach... how many women are discouraged of choosing careers in fields traditionally dominated by men precisely because the likelihood of being remunerated adequately and treated fairly is low ? surely some of those women are intelligent, conscientious, and competent, and would have their place among the bests... in a similar manner, equality of starting points, rebalancing the general circumstances individuals are « born into, » is not about trying to uniformize outcomes, but is rather about encouraging the healthy development of communities through improving the chances that all individuals actually reach the levels of excellence they have the ability to reach...
Sorry, Mr. Peterson, you are now working for the Daily Wire. That is the radical right. Please don't lecture the rest of us.
Right on.
You're wrong on one count, Doctor Peterson: The German National Socialist Party was not far right. They were socialists.
Lafayette college
What a joke 🤣😅
Yes, and all that space in between is useless. You either stand for something or you fall for everything, there is no middle road that leads to success for a society as a whole. History shows that very clearly.
Everything would be ok with J.P. view point except when he says that need to "box radicals" he risk's put them into social shadow, and when things goes into a shadow , well, professor of psychology knows himself what could happened.
Jordan: **is one of the most cited clinical psychologists in Western history**
Muppet, citing "reasons" why Jordan is bad: "u only like him because degree."
Not really. Left stands for governmental control and right for self control. Everything else are mainstream definitions.
Not remotely true. Right or left ideology has nothing to do with governmental control. Government control is a means to an end and is employed by both sides.
@@282XVL You give my explanation 0%. lol Right and Left ideology has a very narrow difference. You might think that Na.zis are so much different from Ko.mmunists.
I never see the left in the comments of his videos trying to argue their side. If these people actually listened to his videos I imagine it might wake some up. They would rather just go on short clips taken out of context and what their peers say. Really shows their lack of intelligence.
I kinda get politics in a way, life can be so crushingly pointless, it's no surprise people latch on to these teams and fight for the cause.
When Mr. Peterson starts talking politics, I shut him off. When he speaks on issues within his professional per view, I cherish every word.
First I’d like to say that there are no college liberals so who exactly is Jordan offending?
…
I haven’t become “right wing,” but I just can’t get with the straw man arguing and ideological rigidity coming from “the left.” Even a discussion should be banned cuz they don’t agree with 100% of everything that someone says.
Why HAVEN'T you become right wing?
He's WRONG, MONEY IS INEQUALITY, and it's an inanimate object so it doesn't give a "seriously not good" shit.
All the lines too far have been 'normalized'
It's hard to believe these wokist comments are still coming in. One really needs to know when to quit.
this moderator is not competent. his choice of material is poor at best.
I'm having this issue with our state Medical Transportation, MOTIVECARE...DENYING ME RIDES,LYING,AS WELL.AS CAMC.CANCER.CENTER IN OUR STATE CAPITOL,CHARLESTON, WV.LAWSUIT
But the argument could be said that the radical right makes the exact same predisposition that the radical left does, which is what he is claiming. I am not for the radical right nor left and feel indifferent towards Peterson. I agree and disagree with his arguments. He is however clearly subjective, and I am shocked that the comments are so supportive of his argument.
I agree that the gap is the problem, but his argument is flawed. The more you pay attention to Peterson, the more you can dissect his subjective arguments that are arbitrarily bias.
I can clearly see how he targets his audience and the same could be said for the left.
The writer is an embarrassment
Pygmies are not at least as good as the rest of the world. Some races are better or worse than others.
Well, they are well adapted to their territory... There is that. LOL
If conservatives can label activity as abusive and kidnap the children of people who don't force conformity, then leftists can too. Leave the children alone includes everyone or noone.
There is no radical or far right wing of the conservative movement. The far right comes from another part of the world, in America the far right is what we call the far left.
I like Jordan, but on this he is lying and he knows he is, I lost some respect for him on this topic.
The left would probably say the same thing. I think it's fair to bow down in humility and acknowledge both sides has its extremists, and I don't really think its a controversial thing to say.
@Prasanth Thomas The far right is a socialist movement. Many of them are Catholics. The far left in the states is simply the far right with some slight changes. The far right in the EU has nothing to do with conservatism.
It doesn't matter who claims what, what I am stating is a fact, it remains a fact no matter what is said against it.
@Prasanth Thomas Most of the Nazi's were Catholic. What you think you know and reality don't match.
If you believe a trans person isn’t trans but is the sex they transitioned to then you’re as mad as someone who believes that an almighty god demands you don’t work on the sabbath.
But if you don’t respect the people who want to rest on the sabbath or the people who want to live their lives as the opposite sex they are then you’re just as bad.
He's mad because he thinks you can't change biology just because you feel a certain way? If I felt I was royalty would it be fair for me to demand you call me king? Silly
@@phill6815 read it again. Carefully. Note each word and it meaning.
@@phill6815 it’s a perfectly fine sentence. If you think it’s not can rewrite it more succinctly so I can learn please. English might not be my strongest language!
@@Theactivepsychos you are trying to compare a sexual deviancy/gender dysphoria to someone's idea of religious requirements (that are fairly open to different interpretation) and saying that not having respect for both goes against christianity when the Bible is fairly clear on Gods opinion about homosexuality which makes the comparison nonsensical.
Completely absurd comparison
@@phill6815 your comprehension of what I’m saying is so appallingly wide of the mark there’s not much point carrying on. I’d have to break each word down. You really haven’t understood it at all. Could be my fault for not being clear but I can’t reword it to make it any clearer. It’s exactly what I’m saying and what I mean. Anyway have a good day.
poor mr. p. sure does avoid the issue. issues. with word salad.
Jordan boasts of being a Conservative Christian, who of course badmouths all things Liberal. I am a Canadian, and no matter which party is in office, I am always thankful to live in Canada.
I suggest you follow the money.
In 2022, Peterson signed a content distribution deal with conservative media company, The Daily Wire. The Daily Wire is an American conservative news website and media company founded in 2015 by political commentator Ben Shapiro and film director Jeremy Boreing. It is a leading publisher on Facebook, and produces podcasts such as The Ben Shapiro Show.
Speaking of $$, who can battle the war being waged by corrupt politicians??? They come into office and their wealth grows exponentially. They no longer represent their constituents but bow to their financiers.
@@josephtravers777 I suggest that if you or I were in office, we would take full advantage of the perks, and we wouldn't do any bit a better job than they do in trying to please their constituents.
Don't you agree?
@@josephtravers777 We can be thankful that the members of the divisive parties bicker among each other.
In Russia, there isn't any bickering, as Putin rules supreme over all others, including the citizens.
The problem is, we are spoiled.
@@junevandermark952 I do not agree.
@@josephtravers777 "I do not agree" about WHAT?
If you are going to converse, it helps to make a statement on what your disagreement entails.
Do you LOVE Jordan's posts because he is faithful to the Conservative party and continually badmouths Trudeau and all things Liberal?
Do you LOVE Jordan's posts because he preaches Christianity as his favorite religious subject?
What is it that you personally LOVE about Jordan's posts?