Code Foils, No Limitz V2 and Project Cedrus Evolution Surf | 75cm Mast Review

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 лип 2024
  • A comparison of 75cm masts from Code Foils, Project Cedrus and No Limitz for a flatwater paddle up test. Ability to get up and going and speed and glide once up were all taken into account for my breakdown of each mast.
    This is part 1 of a 3 part test, excited to get the gear out winging and downwind to give my final verdict.
    Check out the Coach Casey Club for more insight
    into foil equipment, foil technique and training tips.
    Filmed by Jamie Gray

КОМЕНТАРІ • 27

  • @henryhester1897
    @henryhester1897 3 місяці тому

    This is great that you’re doing a fair honest test, including your product.

  • @baakquiro7366
    @baakquiro7366 3 місяці тому +1

    Awesome James !

  • @gcammar
    @gcammar 3 місяці тому +1

    Hi James, I compared (without flat water paddle ups) a 75cm NL V2 mast to the old non monobloc 75cm F-One carbon 14mm (40% HM) and came to the same conclusion. The NL is stiffer and better with more control in the waves, the F-One had much better glide in downwinders and was overall significantly faster. Fortunately in about a month F-One will release a new monobloc 75cm carbon mast (95% HM and same exact section of the old one) which will be stiffer and should offer the best of both worlds. Cheers, great video!

    • @jamescasey7393
      @jamescasey7393  3 місяці тому

      Thanks for sharing and excited to see the next generation of masts!

  • @svensshed1564
    @svensshed1564 3 місяці тому

    That was actually really interesting to watch. I would have said that I wouldnt be able to see the difference, but it was noticeable. The Cedrus mast seemed to glide for ages.

  • @__emiduran__
    @__emiduran__ 3 місяці тому

    Great review!!! Pretty objective!!!! Thanks James!!!

  • @Childrenofthefreeworld
    @Childrenofthefreeworld 3 місяці тому

    So good 🤙🤙

  • @lukas2713
    @lukas2713 25 днів тому

    would there be much difference between a 75cm and a, say, 82cm mast?

  • @Childrenofthefreeworld
    @Childrenofthefreeworld 3 місяці тому

    How bout that wing specific cedrus could be a good sup option ?

  • @mikeoneill2615
    @mikeoneill2615 2 місяці тому

    Hey James, what adapters are you using and how do you find the connection compared to the code mast? I’ve got a no limitz mast with the takuma M6 mast connection.

  • @rolandjacques649
    @rolandjacques649 3 місяці тому

    Good info. Thanks. Side note
    Have you tested different surface finishes?

    • @jamescasey7393
      @jamescasey7393  3 місяці тому

      I have not but that’d be very interesting

  • @apricotscrub
    @apricotscrub 3 місяці тому

    When you said you could go down a size on the nl, does that mean its more efficient at low end? But doesnt glide as well meaning more drag at mid and high speed range?

    • @jamescasey7393
      @jamescasey7393  3 місяці тому

      It’s as simple as it’s lighter, like a lighter rider can use a smaller foil 🤷🏽‍♂️

  • @apricotscrub
    @apricotscrub 3 місяці тому

    Why in theory would there be less glide on the nl?

    • @sikguystg
      @sikguystg 3 місяці тому +1

      longer chord

    • @tom-foil
      @tom-foil 3 місяці тому

      It's thicker. 16mm all along.

    • @kylelobisser1962
      @kylelobisser1962 3 місяці тому +5

      @@tom-foil actually Cedrus is technically thicker on average due to the top and bottom of the mast. But it has better glide due to shorter chord length and less wetted area. Hopefully we can start to put the thickness argument to bed. Thin masts with long chord length have more drag than thick masts.

    • @jamescasey7393
      @jamescasey7393  3 місяці тому

      Longer chord, less taper and maybe a slower section 🤷🏽‍♂️ unsure of the section though, hard to measure

    • @scottseale
      @scottseale Місяць тому

      @@kylelobisser1962Is the thickness to chord ratio a better characterization of the section drag? Thanks