Fujifilm eterna 400t vs eterna film simulation photowalk

As fuji user I have always been thinking - were its film simulations made out of the real film or just named in honour of fuji's most popular films.
And now I did the comparison between the eterna film simulation and real eterna 400t cause eterna is my favourite film simulation on fuji.
I was trying to expose image on my zenith 11 and fuji xt30 equally and on both cameras I used the legendary helios 44m-4 58mm f2, on fuji it's 87mm of a full frame equivalent.
All pictures are straight out of the cameras without any corrections.
Write in the comments - does digital eterna looks like real 400t and don't forget to subscribe to watch the second part of my experiment.
Music:
P. I. Tchaikovsky: Dance of the Sugar Plum Fairy by Kevin MacLeod from freemusicarchive.org
Lakes by Jeff Kaale from uppbeat.io

[@LucaCada70]

The comparison is interesting and well done; out of curiosity, did you develop the film in C 41 or in ECN2? Have you,by any chance, used a filter, or have you ever thought about using an orange filter?Many thanks

[@MikeNason]

Ecn 2 of course, I used no filters cause I had no idea at that time about yellow tint that appeared on the film after developing and I don't think that I will use it in the future cause it's easier to correct white balance on post

[@rainzhao2000]

I'm so glad you did this comparison! I searched exactly for a video about this. While there are some color cast differences, and even some sometimes the digital highlights are clipping, they can still look similar. One concern I have about the film is how you scanned it, because the scanner you use can change the look and color of a film a lot. I'm not sure about fujifilm, but for kodak motion picture stock, they're usually scanned in a log format like Cineon. For example camera companies like Arri and Blackmagic also make motion picture film scanners and they use variants of Cineon encoding.

[@cubdukat]

Eterna would have been handled the same way. That's SOP for negative movie film.
The problem is that all of these comparisons to the original Eterna are kinda flawed to begin with. First, Eterna's been discontinued as a motion picture stock for about a decade or so, so there no new fresh stock to draw from and because of that, the results are always going to be at the mercy of how it was stored. Second, Eterna was never meant to be shot as a still film.

[@MikeNason]

sorry, but I gave the film to the photo store and I don't know what scanner they used