not even close, I assume you have watched a few opens and honestly looks like fishing for follows and likes but the question itself is vague, what exactly are you considering the upset, Stewart Cink winning, a former winner losing he was 59 not 99, or the silver medalist finishing third? None of those things are upsets, in an upset you have a winner that nobody expected, or had a sore back or something.
Westwood should have went for the lag 2 putt instead of trying to make a 45 footer. Cost him a playoff and a great chance to win his first major. Same for Watson on the last hole. Should've just lagged it up and tapped in for the win. Golf is so mental.
I actually kind of like the decision by the filmmakers to gloss over Tom Watson's amazing 65 on Day 1. Anyone watching the film who DIDN'T know what happened the rest of the week would think that's really cool, but whatever, we all know he's gonna regress later, and then be absolutely blown away by the fact that he DIDN'T regress. For 71 holes anyway.
I almost can't watch this bc of the worst bounce in golfing history. Stewart cink is a great guy but Tom is golfing royalty. Still hurts to watch him not win this. Also I forgot westy came a 3 putt away from being in this playoff. Sad he never got his major
It’s not remotely scandalous. The Open can’t be held on a course with a corporate title, that’s all it is. The USGA take the same view with their US Open venues.
@@MrAJR76Not so, according to the R&A the Open cannot return to Turnberry while it is owned by Trump “for security reasons”. That’s the report for 2023, and it seems completely bogus - but that’s the stated reason.
It’s inexplicable that they wouldn’t once show the players’ scores or the leaderboard. It’s unwatchable. The USGA does a much better job uploading the US Opens.
Is this the biggest upset in Open history?
Adam Scott 2012
its up there, but what an effort from old Tom. Legend.
Ben Curtis?
No, President Trump buying your golf course was.
not even close, I assume you have watched a few opens and honestly looks like fishing for follows and likes but the question itself is vague, what exactly are you considering the upset, Stewart Cink winning, a former winner losing he was 59 not 99, or the silver medalist finishing third? None of those things are upsets, in an upset you have a winner that nobody expected, or had a sore back or something.
Watson flushed that 8 iron on 18. Hit dead center of green! I’ve watched it over and over just hoping it will check up!
The only person rooting for Stewart Cink to win was his mom.
I am loving watching all these official films, hooked. Could you please not put the winner in the title, k thanks! 😅
Westwood should have went for the lag 2 putt instead of trying to make a 45 footer. Cost him a playoff and a great chance to win his first major. Same for Watson on the last hole. Should've just lagged it up and tapped in for the win. Golf is so mental.
I feel so bad for Watson
Imagine how amazing it would have been if Watson won? It's a shame for Cink tbh. But Watson was unbelievable.
I was having such a good day too...
Play of holes were brutal. Whoever picked them.
I actually kind of like the decision by the filmmakers to gloss over Tom Watson's amazing 65 on Day 1.
Anyone watching the film who DIDN'T know what happened the rest of the week would think that's really cool, but whatever, we all know he's gonna regress later, and then be absolutely blown away by the fact that he DIDN'T regress. For 71 holes anyway.
I almost can't watch this bc of the worst bounce in golfing history. Stewart cink is a great guy but Tom is golfing royalty. Still hurts to watch him not win this. Also I forgot westy came a 3 putt away from being in this playoff. Sad he never got his major
Nothing against Stewart Cink...except the entire world.
kevin spacey does golf?
its time for us to forgive Cink for this. Stewart.. . I forgive you. x
I don’t forgive him.
I don't either
@@Lovetowinmoneyso you just expect Cink to lose on purpose and risk 1 million dollars to just let Watson win Watson wanted to win but not like that
Totally diff course now. Number 1 in Europe and can’t get an open because of a name. Scandalous
It’s not remotely scandalous.
The Open can’t be held on a course with a corporate title, that’s all it is.
The USGA take the same view with their US Open venues.
@@MrAJR76Not so, according to the R&A the Open cannot return to Turnberry while it is owned by Trump “for security reasons”. That’s the report for 2023, and it seems completely bogus - but that’s the stated reason.
It’s inexplicable that they wouldn’t once show the players’ scores or the leaderboard. It’s unwatchable. The USGA does a much better job uploading the US Opens.