Julius Caesar - On the way across the Aegean Sea, Caesar was kidnapped by pirates and held prisoner. He maintained an attitude of superiority throughout his captivity. The pirates demanded a ransom of 20 talents of silver, but he insisted that they ask for 50. After the ransom was paid, Caesar raised a fleet, pursued and captured the pirates, and imprisoned them. He had them crucified on his own authority, as he had promised while in captivity-a promise that the pirates had taken as a joke.
A young Roman was captured by pirates. He told them he was going to kill them all. They laughed and the Roman later escaped. The young Roman returned commanding a fleet and killed all the pirates. Guess who the Roman was, Julius, later known as Caesar.
You missed one of the most brutal acts of revenge in all of History. What Vlad Tepes (Aka Vlad Dracula or Vlad the impaler) did to the Boyars after he returned to power after the exile they caused is legendary. Much worse then half of the things on this list.
@J D3 And a fledgling Intelligence organization in Mosad found one of those responsible. Somehow Israel, a nation of 12 years, found Eichmann in South America when the Superpower could not (did not).
Everyone complaining how fast he talked haha. I loved it, he doesn't waste your time with nonsense he gets strait to the point. MORE channels need to do this!
Im not saying religion wasnt a reason for many wars, but just saying that most wars were started for land and resources just saying. Also in many cases religion was an excuse that was told to the people when actually there were political reasons. The biggest war caused by religion were crusades.
Actually, the first crusade was caused by the byzantine/ eastern roman emperors call for help against the turks who were overrunning them. The pope saw that as an opportunity to lead the violence in Europe somewhere else.
no even the crusades were about taking land. They just pushed the "they worship a different invisible man" angle harder then others to get the people behind it
+Ian MacFadyen Well no. The original crusades was the pope shitting himself in fear, because the Islamic caliphate/Kingdoms were expanding taking over several Christian lands. Pope told all the Kings of Europe "Hey, if we don't quell this we'll all be speaking Arabic" Thus a holy war started uniting several Euro nations (Unofficially) under one banner to kick Islam's ass for taking Christian land.
Fair play to the Americans who executed those 500 SS guards and armed the survivors of the camp!! The Allies let far too many war criminals escape justice and should have tried a lot more than the 26 men at Nuremberg!!
Ivan Strydom Hilarious that you insult and belittle someone who was NOT trying to wage war against religion. They were stating it was a stupid excuse🙄 what an asshole.
Nice! Here are two more: Spartacus's slave army was defeated by Marcus Licinius Crassus and the re-captured slaves were made an example of by crucifying thousands of them along one of the main roads leading back to Rome. Certainly and effective PR campaign! At the end of the Punic Wars Rome destroyed Carthage and supposedly went at length to sow salt into the land where the city once stood so that nothing would ever again grow there. Carthage never recovered.
Yeah normally I should source this kind of information. I am not sure who wrote about this but probably someone like Tacitus or the Plinys. They, on the other hand, did not source anything, which is already second hand research since they did not personally observe any of it, so the credibility of these kinds of statements is not particularly reliable. Therefore, it would be fair to say that legend has it that's what happened.
Lol my man Spartacus was pretty vengeful himself on the show they portrayed him as more merciful than he was, all the lives that had to he taken every time they took a villa. Then after Crixus fell the show depicts them forcing about 20 captives including Crassus' son to fight as gladiators when in reality it was about 300 get sentenced to death that way in honor of Crixus, and then to hasten his speed of travel after ridding himself of useless materials put all other prisoners to the sword. Aside from all the Roman's killed when taking villas(which could be considered revenge since they weren't war battles)he put a minimum of 300 to death for revenge likely with all numbers not counting battle numbers were twice as high maybe thousands or at least a thousand.
That wasn't right though. They invaded Carthage the third time for no reason than to finish them off the face of the Earth. It can't even be said it was revenge for what Hannibal did because Carthage was already forced to pay for that war.
Sorry, but there are some serious errors here: 10) _The Count of Monte Cristo_ is a fictional work by Alexander Dumas and in no way "based on a true story." 8) The massacre was not an act of revenge, but part of the French Protestant Wars, a series of wars about the establishment of the Huguenots in France, which was declared heretical by the ruling Catholics. In previous centuries, they would have simply been culled, but the reformation was afoot. A little more complicated than a revenge plot. 4) The Dachau liberation killings were not some secret that "came to light in the early 2000s." General Patton's decision to pardon the perpetrators was headline news in 1945. There was even a book published on the subject in the 1980s. Historians have been well aware of the incident, even if it has faded from public memory. The actual investigative report was lost in 1960s, but found again in the early 90s. None of that having to do with the 2000s! 3) The massacre at Urgench was not for revenge, but part of the usual Mongol stratagem of massacring cities that resisted. Furthermore, the highest estimate of the bloodshed there is 1.2 million, and most historians consider it to be a tremendous exaggeration at that. The entirety of the Mongol expansion is estimated to have killed around 4 million people, not just one particular incident, and that was all because of their strategic massacring, not vengeance.
Geoff - It troubles me that you got three likes. England didn't even exist at the time, nor did any of the kingdoms that were to eventually become England. England didn't actually exist until around the 9th or 10th century, 500 years after the Romans left. Welsh and Cornish are the two last remaining remnants of the languages spoken throughout Britain, south of Hadrian's wall, during the time of Boudica.
If I had seen what they saw, I would have killed 500 SS guards by myself. All the American soldiers had to go through hell fighting the Nazis only to find out that they were monsters. What surprises me is that only 500 were killed. Even 10,000 SS killed would be a small drop in the bucket.
dsoutherngent1 I have to agree that outright killing an SS guard is 100 times more humane than gassing and torturing humans that some idiot decides to classify as undesirable. In that sense, I almost think that killing 500 SS guards was more of a mercy killing rather revenge. I think that we should suggest that the producer of this video make a revised video. It really pales in comparison with the other acts of revenge.
crusty old fart First of all, history is not my specialty even though I enjoy history on the side. Secondly, I would tend to discount anything made into a film or movie because I have yet to see a 100% accurate portrayal. Thirdly, I tend to rely more on historians to accurately portray history. While I realize that this leads to a level of uncertainty, I do read several historians and occasionally primary sources. All the history books that I have read tend to confirm that there was a holocaust. Michael Shermer, Skeptic in Chief, who has investigated a respectable number of hoaxes, has determined that the Holocaust was not a hoax. This is unusual in that most of the time after his investigation, he finds unusual claims to be hoaxes. The last thing that I have to say is that there are no universities who will accept anyone for a professorship position if that person denies the holocaust. Several persons have presented their ideas to me before and attempted to support their ideas with books whose authors have questionable credentials. I am calling stalemate on this one because I am not even going to attempt to persuade anyone nor do I think there is sufficient cause to reconsider. If by any chance you believe that you know of any sources that might be reliable, please leave me a list for my benefit and the benefit of any inquiring minds. Thank you.
This was good. I really enjoyed watching this video. So, cheers and thanks for enriching my knowledge of history and doing it in such an enjoyable way. Nice one 👍☺
Never knew that and I am a WWII life long historian. As for the liberation being marred? Perhaps I am too jaded, myself, but sounds like justice to me. The world is not a nice place. As the Germans taught the Jews....and were then taught themselves..... I am a real life American veteran who served with the Army values to the upmost I could. But if I had walked into a German concentration cp in the final days of WWII.....I don't know how I would have reacted but I judge NONE who reacted as they did.
An Indian friend told me, that women who go to police to report rape are likely to get raped by the police, too. That's because in the eyes of the policemen she is already dishonored and it doesn't matter if she gets raped one more time anyways. Of course she probably doesn't receive any help. It's also very likely she gets rejected by her family and society, so it's better to not talk about it for her. The incident where the rape of the young student in the bus which made it to the world press was also just outrageous to the Indian society because she belonged to a higher caste while the assaulter were untouchables.
+jelly orwhat That comes off as a reason to speak up MORE. Otherwise it just keeps the whole thing under wraps and lets it all continue. But your comment has nothing to do with what you replied to.
That actually makes a lot of sense. And I understand more why it was so publicised. Thanks for the insight. +BJGvideos Sadly things don't work like that outside the bubble of Europe and North America. With all due respect, there's a lot of eye opening you need to do mate...
My personal favorite, Tomyris killing and drinking wine from the skull of Cyrus the Great (king of kings) for killing her son. The layers to the story and personal backstory of the individuals involved is just wonderful.
I'd gladly give you both a one-way ticket to east upper-Silesia. Hope you don't mind the heat. Now I'll enjoy song "Gegrilltes Fleisch" even more, Untermensch.
"Religion is seriously like the cause of all wars ever." Actually, according to "Encyclopedia of Wars" by Charles Phillips and Alan Axelrod, only 123 of the 1,763 documented wars have a religious cause. That's less than 7%.
For the people in power perhaps. But not the vast majority of followers who kill and die in that cause. Try telling them it's an excuse and that they don't actually believe.
At the battle of Clontarf, Irish hero Brian Boru was killed by Brodir of Mann while he was praying in his tent. After his brother, Ulf the Quarrelsome, found the headless body, he took some men and set out to find Brodir. When he did, he proceeded to cut open Brodir's belly, rip out his intestines, and wind them all around a large tree. The legends say that Brodir did not die until all his intestines were out of his body
The one I thought of upon seeing this list was Ivar the Boneless and King Aella of Northumbria. Though there's some question as to the reality of the incident, since it was recorded in traditional Norse poetry, the story goes that after Aella killed Ivars father by tossing him in a snake pit, Ivar went to war with Aella, defeated him, captured him, and then exacted his familial revenge by cutting away the ribs from Aella's spine, and ripping out his lungs through the holes he'd created.
In the last 2'000 years not only did religion repress scientific discovery, but yes, religion has had a major factor in all major wars in human history. To look at a recent example, The Vatican celebrated Hitlers birthday during his time of power, and Hitler declared his en-devour as 'the work of christ'. I'm gonna assume you're religious, and one that believes in fairness, equality and peace. But, The Bible and The Quran, in parts, command violence. So this is why people claim religion causes violence and wars, because it's and easy vessel to justify atrocities. Because it does.
Couple things. One, he said that religion was the reason for *nearly* all wars in the history of forever. Two, while that may be taken to be generally false, what truly starts wars is 'ideology'. Ideology being defined as a 'system of ideas and ideals', religions are ideologies, yes, but so are forms of governance, or even the personal values and principles of one man could be considered an ideology of one. Soldiers that fight for their people do so out of an ideology of 'king and country'. People act in a way as to uphold their own principles, and principles start fights if someone violates them. In most cases, these ideologies are built around something tangible. King, country, loved ones. Things that are verifiably true in this world and that can be touched. But religion, no matter how hard people balk and scream, isn't a verifiable truth. God as the foundation of a religion has never been observed by anyone, inviting many interpretations of His words, and because of that conflicts that arise over religious ideology are by far the hardest to reconcile. There are no facts to check, no tangible slights to avenge. Just a bunch of people espousing the values of different fictional works and treating them as fact. Perhaps religion wouldn't be as widespread as it is today if more people understood the concept of confirmation bias two thousand years ago. With such a loose interpretation of factuality of course religious ideologies will rarely see eye to eye on things concerning 'God'. But this is hardly the fault of theists as a whole. The holy Books of certain Gods are so filled with dangerous passages because of a few ancient belligerent embittered cunts who couldn't resist injecting their notions of 'God' into their petty, *mortal* squabbles. A publicity stunt that lasted for millennia. So yes, religion is not at the root of all wars, but the percentage of wars it does cause tend to never truly end.
+WhatCulture Religion is only responsible for 7% of all wars ever fought since the beginning of recorded history. it would be nice if you were actually done your research before making such an ignorant comment.
I know. It gets old with that lie constantly being pushed. Or,, religion has killed more people blah blah. They conveniently forget ALL the N.K. leaders, Stalin and Mao.. Who have killed more people than ANYBODY combined in history. AND they are followed by the likes of Muslims (near genocidal acts to Africans over the last several centuries and STILL going, how that gets ignored is astounding), ritual sacrificial cultures such as babylon and the aztecs. But somehow Christianity gets trashed..
AGM_Flatline you need to reread what I wrote. Nothing you said is accurate. As to bringing up old stuff. What did you just do? Again reread what I wrote. It's factual.
Ooooookay a few things. Crusades happened for power, land, and to fight back the Muslims who were collectively fucking up that entire sector of the globe. Also, the church used religion as a tool to gather people. They didn't just all bump into each other at the market and go "Hey.... we're all Catholics/Christians, right?? WANNA FUCK SOME SHIT UP??" and go on a rampage. Read a book. Christians were evil bastards? When? When their god was preaching peace, creating the golden rule, and spouting "love thy neighbor"? Human nature breeds hatred, pal. Not religion. Don't pin all of histories issues on the religious. And lastly, get away from that pathetic "I am a man of science" holier than thou crap. The world has moved further from religion since the mid 1800s and the world has gone further down the shitter. You need to rethink your logic.
nothing has changed threw thousands of years !!! ... men seek power!!! how do u think Nostradameus could predict all those verses .... cause he studied man and he new that everything repeats itself ... man is greedy and seeks power !!! just look at the elections !!! same thing...
"Being the reason for all wars in the history of forever." Referring to religion. Your biases are getting the better of you. Obviously that's not true. Even in your video a mere handful of the wars mentioned had anything to do with religion. Not to mention that more often than not religion was only an excuse for the rulers of some nations to expand territory or in some cases throw off the yoke of the Catholic church. I'm not saying there haven't been wars fought over religion, but in the history of man they represent only a small minority of the history of war. Then there's the Catholic church, an institution that in times past was so vile it's hard to fathom. Ruled by ruthless men who used religion to increase their own power and wealth but believed less than your average next door atheist. Usually at the expense of any true believers who were more often than not their victims rather than their accomplices. The Catholic church is responsible for the murder of more Christians and Jews than any other group with the exception of Islam who exceed the Catholic church only because by this point they've been at it longer. That only because somewhere along the way the Catholic church managed to reform itself to some small degree and stopped their own murder of Christians. Though it might be fair to say they share some culpability for the holocaust, for their silence if nothing else. They STILL to this day are responsible for the persecution of many Christians and Jews even if they have stopped outright murdering them. People who make such statements as yours gloss over the real motivations involved. To this day religion is used as a smoke screen by the powerful to do things that most religions find repugnant. Edit: Why in the world is it that when you post comments in UA-cam using Microsoft Edge you can't use paragraphs? I have to edit my comments using Firefox just to form a proper paragraph.
Finally someone has the intelligence to understand this. An unfortunate but true analogy is the argument of gun control in regards to gun violence. A gun, without an owner or a human to use it, can't do any harm. When it is put into the hands of someone righteous or trying to protect their loved ones, it's a good thing. When it is put into the hands of someone who doesn't know how to safely handle or it someone who has bad intentions, there are negative consequences. People use religion almost as a weapon to control people and society while corrupting and distorting its true intentions.
There are many good Christian Catholics yes. But Christianity isn't something you're born into. It's a choice that is born out through your actions. As Jesus said "You shall know them by their fruit." In fact what I'm referring to when I say they killed many Christians I'm including true believers in Christ within the Catholic church. By itself the the Catholic church is an institution, and for the most part a political institution rather than a religious one. That is borne out through their fruit, just as Jesus said. Even today they are more interested in manipulating the political realm than having any true belief in Christ. Being in the Catholic church doesn't automatically make you a Christian. Having a sincere belief in Jesus as the Saviour who bore our sins on the cross and was resurrected from the dead is what makes you a Christian. What I'm referring to is the leadership. Particularly in the middle ages. They did a lot of horrible things, including to their own people all for expanding their power and wealth and would destroy anyone who dared say or even believe differently.
People often say things they really believe as a joke and when people really believe this kind of lie, and they do, it's no laughing matter. Yes, it's said in the tone of a joke, but it's also said in a tone that suggests he actually believes this. When someone mocks someone or something in this way, they do so because they believe it, not because they don't.
BarakIII The middle ages weren't a particularly bad time. In fact, the Catholic church had a notably lighter hand than the feuding Germanic lords who would cast them off in favor of greater power by controlling churches of their own.
It kind of was... The Welsh people populated majority of the islands, with the Picts in the North. It wasn't until after the Romans retreated from Britain that the Saxons invaded (a little before A.D 500) and eventually forced the native populace into the West where Wales is now.
Rome vs. Carthage? I don't know any other instances in history where the avenger "salted the soil" after killing EVERYBODY IN THE CITY so that NOTHING WOULD EVER GROW THERE AGAIN.
you know you guys can upload a video up to 15 minutes you don't have to speed talk all the way through. It's not cool, you got yourselves a view but lost yourselves a like and a sub.
For such a serious subject I got a good laugh from the moderator, funny guy.
8 років тому+4
Instead of talking like you had 17,000 cups of coffee then snorted two tons of cocaine .. how about just slowing down? would have been greatly interesting otherwise.
One of - the Black Wedding & the Glencoe Massacre, both in Scotland have already been noted as the inspiration, but I don't doubt there were plenty of examples for Martin to choose from. And, what makes this one worse; it wasn't limited to Paris- it quickly spread 'round France, as it was part of the larger conflict: the French Wars of Religion - I had French ancestors from Lorraine (a fair way from Paris, you'll agree) who were Huguenots- they were lucky, & managed to leg it to England, somehow- having survived that.
1. The St. Bartholomew's Day massacre took place days after the wedding, and it was sparked by the Protestants declaring war on the government and the concept of monarchy altogether earlier that month, itself provoked on by John Calvin's policies changing. In essence, the Huguenots were acting like a cult, following their founder on even politics. (I'm not Catholic) 2. "Byzantine" is a derogatory term coined by the West, and has no historical validity. I'd expect better from this channel in something that's pretty much standard knowledge in history now. It was still the Roman Empire, and they considered themselves Roman and never "Byzantine". Whether or not the Pope in Rome liked that fact or decided to falsely elevate some Frankish-German warlord named Charles to the title of Roman Emperor is irrelevant. Also this: www.huffingtonpost.com/rabbi-alan-lurie/is-religion-the-cause-of-_b_1400766.html
Christopher Langbein It was actually just a settlement, and only part of Constantinople. Merely a village, one of many villages, that got assimilated into a new and much larger city called New Rome. So Byzantium is incorrect even there.
The sole reason the term Byzantine was thrown around _long_ after the actual empire, was the West's interest in delegitimizing it as Rome. It's as ridiculous as if the United States decided to change it's capitol to Miami, then fractures a few centuries later with the original government still ruling in Florida but leading to some crackpot in Houston to declare that his new country is actually the true America and that the Miami regime is actually a different country called the Floridian States.
Religion was not the reason for “every war, ever”. It was an excuse for SOME wars, but not a reason and certainly not every war. Fighting over religion is a relatively recent invention. Since about the time that, ummmm.... some religions *cough Islam cough* wars have been fought over religion. Yes, the Jews fought to take Canaan from the indigenous population, but that was a short and VERY localized war. Since some religions *cough Islam cough* came about, people really were just honest about their reasons for fighting a war. They fought over land and resources like gold, cattle, and water. The Roman soldiers fought to expand their emperor’s empire and the Chinese fought each other for about 1000 years for the same reason. So get some original ideas, why don’t you.
Wasn't really revenge. It was done to end the war and avoid a land invasion. If they'd wanted revenge they'd have attacked Tokyo but instead it was specifically not targeted.
tendjinn Yeah but..considering the war was essentially over, couldn't they have formed a coalition and worked out some other way? Slaughtering hundreds of thousands of civilians who have literally nothing to do with the war just shouldn't sit well with any human.
True, although, real talk, they only really needed to brutally level one city to make their point, right? And, even realer talk, why the fuck did they need to level a city at all?! I think a couple of Atomic bombs dropped on a military base or small town in the general vicinity of Tokyo would have gotten the message across! Nuking Japan's 7th or 8th AND 11th or 12th largest cities, depending on how you measure cities, kinda seems like unnecessary revenge to me.
Abc AwesomeP Exacly. You can find thousands of wars that had nothing to do with religion. Religion = all wars bullshit is usually spread by people with no clue how states or countries were run through history.
Ever heard of Encyclopedia of Wars? Fun stuff. Turns out that out of 1763 wars only about 120 are classified as religious. Maybe Internet Fedora atheists need to read something first and not just *repeat abstract arguments like broken record.
Trace Pillar Encyclopedia of Wars? Yeah I heard of it. So basically we're just talking about wars of religion vs religion? Like WW2 isn't considered but Crusades are amirite?
Augustus for bringing all of the people involved with Julius Caesar's murder. Not only did he exact revenge, he was able to rise to power & remove his rivals in one bloody stroke.
To be fair to Genghis Khan, his dealings with the Shah of Khwarezm went more like this : 1/ Genghis Khan sends ambassadors with gifts to draw up a trade agreement with the Shah. 2/ A local governor has the ambassadors murdered, and steals their diplomatic gifts. 3/ Genghis Khan sends more ambassadors to the Shah, with more presents. 4/ The Shah has the ambassadors killed and keeps the gifts. 5/ Genghis Khan asks for an explanation and an apology. 6/ The Shah "flips" Genghis Khan, thinking that Genghis Khan is just a smelly, ignorant nomadic peasant. 7/ Genghis Khan, using the best army in the world, removes Khwarezm from the map. And 8/ Robert Greene writes a book called The 48 Laws of Power, using this incident to illustrate the rule *Know Who You Are Dealing With. Do Not Offend the Wrong Person*.
Julius Caesar - On the way across the Aegean Sea, Caesar was kidnapped by pirates and held prisoner. He maintained an attitude of superiority throughout his captivity. The pirates demanded a ransom of 20 talents of silver, but he insisted that they ask for 50. After the ransom was paid, Caesar raised a fleet, pursued and captured the pirates, and imprisoned them. He had them crucified on his own authority, as he had promised while in captivity-a promise that the pirates had taken as a joke.
battles B.C julius caesar monster siege best killer ever !
like a boss
revenge to a hole new level
read that in 'A General History of the Pirates' eh? :P
OG
The 200 women getting revenge for being raped definitely makes #1 of my list of revenge
A young Roman was captured by pirates. He told them he was going to kill them all. They laughed and the Roman later escaped. The young Roman returned commanding a fleet and killed all the pirates. Guess who the Roman was, Julius, later known as Caesar.
Finally, someone fixed the audio 10/10.
+
+Isabella Bornberg ya im not alone! +
+Vengeful Wraith well stupid of corse your not alone lots.of people watch vlog brothers but i have seen very little out side of vlogbrothers
Wars are fought for gain, religion is often the excuse and the motivator...
Wow someone with a brain. kudos.
ww1 and ww2 , gulf war, irak invasion, war of Vietnam etc... are all caused by religion (I'm being sarcastic :P)
Yep and even then only 3% of all wars were fought in the name of a religion
+TheBernikov ww2 was because religion? didnt know that, explain please
TheBernikov what..
You missed one of the most brutal acts of revenge in all of History. What Vlad Tepes (Aka Vlad Dracula or Vlad the impaler) did to the Boyars after he returned to power after the exile they caused is legendary. Much worse then half of the things on this list.
listning to him talk, well qualifies too IMO
I just added the gruesome death of King Aella by the Vikings use of "Blood Eagle"
I click another Top 10 List,
And Adam Blampied is not in it,
Walks out.
You gave Blampied a chance, why not others?
+Andrew Bannister Cos others are shit
Blampied is booking DQ finishes for WCPW
same lol
No adam no whatculture
same
"...and have since marred the liberation of this camp by US soldiers."
Gotta say I disagree with that statement.
@J D3 killing a killer doesn't change the amount of killers in the world.
@J D3 And a fledgling Intelligence organization in Mosad found one of those responsible. Somehow Israel, a nation of 12 years, found Eichmann in South America when the Superpower could not (did not).
Everyone complaining how fast he talked haha. I loved it, he doesn't waste your time with nonsense he gets strait to the point. MORE channels need to do this!
I wonder. Is there a contest which youtuber can talk the fastest? Or are you trying to become the next Scatman?!
pi papa parapa. papa parapa...
Im listening on 2x speed just fine?
theliberator1
Yo da dub dub.
Wait. Has Eminem a youtube channel?
be ba ba bado bom
Where is Eric Cartman feeding Scott Tenorman's parents to him as chili?
Season 7 premiers September 20th!!!!!!!
I have no issue with the speed of speech, it's great that you can get so much information in a short video :)
How could you miss out on Olga of Kiev? Her revenge was one of the most brutal in history!
Im not saying religion wasnt a reason for many wars, but just saying that most wars were started for land and resources just saying. Also in many cases religion was an excuse that was told to the people when actually there were political reasons. The biggest war caused by religion were crusades.
Actually, the first crusade was caused by the byzantine/ eastern roman emperors call for help against the turks who were overrunning them. The pope saw that as an opportunity to lead the violence in Europe somewhere else.
no even the crusades were about taking land. They just pushed the "they worship a different invisible man" angle harder then others to get the people behind it
+Ian MacFadyen Well no. The original crusades was the pope shitting himself in fear, because the Islamic caliphate/Kingdoms were expanding taking over several Christian lands. Pope told all the Kings of Europe "Hey, if we don't quell this we'll all be speaking Arabic" Thus a holy war started uniting several Euro nations (Unofficially) under one banner to kick Islam's ass for taking Christian land.
I advise you listen to Connorr.
Preach!!!
Fair play to the Americans who executed those 500 SS guards and armed the survivors of the camp!! The Allies let far too many war criminals escape justice and should have tried a lot more than the 26 men at Nuremberg!!
Actually there were numerous war crimes trials. Nuremberg was just the one for the biggies of the Reich.
#1 - Bradshaw beating the shit out of The Blue Meanie
Whoops, wrong channel. :(
I think you mean Stevie Richards legit chairshot on JBL the night after in retribution for Blue Meanie.
Thought it was at a PPV a few months after the incident
haha
haha
fuck bradshaw!
+Andrew Economous e c fuckin dub
Revenge is a dish best served cold.... That means.... REVENGE IS ICECREAM !!!!
Revenge is gazpacho.
or a salad
revenge is also sweet
I Scream.
I just bought ice-cream who wants some?
Actually most wars use religion as an excuse for the real reason for most wars good old fashioned greed.
michaelkeha agreed
Free To Play KING It's the oldest tale in history
Person A: I want your stuff give it to me
Person B: No
Person A: Then I will take it.
michaelkeha yup, I know
Ivan Strydom Hilarious that you insult and belittle someone who was NOT trying to wage war against religion. They were stating it was a stupid excuse🙄 what an asshole.
Saying "I was called by God to (insert crime here)" is quite popular amongst despotic rulers. Some even say they are gods themselves.
Nice! Here are two more: Spartacus's slave army was defeated by Marcus Licinius Crassus and the re-captured slaves were made an example of by crucifying thousands of them along one of the main roads leading back to Rome. Certainly and effective PR campaign! At the end of the Punic Wars Rome destroyed Carthage and supposedly went at length to sow salt into the land where the city once stood so that nothing would ever again grow there. Carthage never recovered.
I'm surprised they would sow salt across an entire city's farmland given how valuable salt was back then.
They would use salt water from the ocean, not salt crystals.
Yeah normally I should source this kind of information. I am not sure who wrote about this but probably someone like Tacitus or the Plinys. They, on the other hand, did not source anything, which is already second hand research since they did not personally observe any of it, so the credibility of these kinds of statements is not particularly reliable. Therefore, it would be fair to say that legend has it that's what happened.
Lol my man Spartacus was pretty vengeful himself on the show they portrayed him as more merciful than he was, all the lives that had to he taken every time they took a villa. Then after Crixus fell the show depicts them forcing about 20 captives including Crassus' son to fight as gladiators when in reality it was about 300 get sentenced to death that way in honor of Crixus, and then to hasten his speed of travel after ridding himself of useless materials put all other prisoners to the sword. Aside from all the Roman's killed when taking villas(which could be considered revenge since they weren't war battles)he put a minimum of 300 to death for revenge likely with all numbers not counting battle numbers were twice as high maybe thousands or at least a thousand.
That wasn't right though. They invaded Carthage the third time for no reason than to finish them off the face of the Earth. It can't even be said it was revenge for what Hannibal did because Carthage was already forced to pay for that war.
Boudica is not Welsh, the Iceni were from the Norfolk- Suffolk area.
Radwulf Eboraci yep. . .true.
Sorry, but there are some serious errors here:
10) _The Count of Monte Cristo_ is a fictional work by Alexander Dumas and in no way "based on a true story."
8) The massacre was not an act of revenge, but part of the French Protestant Wars, a series of wars about the establishment of the Huguenots in France, which was declared heretical by the ruling Catholics. In previous centuries, they would have simply been culled, but the reformation was afoot. A little more complicated than a revenge plot.
4) The Dachau liberation killings were not some secret that "came to light in the early 2000s." General Patton's decision to pardon the perpetrators was headline news in 1945. There was even a book published on the subject in the 1980s. Historians have been well aware of the incident, even if it has faded from public memory. The actual investigative report was lost in 1960s, but found again in the early 90s. None of that having to do with the 2000s!
3) The massacre at Urgench was not for revenge, but part of the usual Mongol stratagem of massacring cities that resisted. Furthermore, the highest estimate of the bloodshed there is 1.2 million, and most historians consider it to be a tremendous exaggeration at that. The entirety of the Mongol expansion is estimated to have killed around 4 million people, not just one particular incident, and that was all because of their strategic massacring, not vengeance.
Also Boudica wasn't Welsh she was English.
I think you mean Iceni england didnt exist at this time it was founded in the 5th to 6th centuries with the anglo saxon migrations
Nope. The English were still in Denmark and Germany. Boudicca was a Briton, Iceni tribe. The Welsh are the decendents of the Britons.
Geoff - It troubles me that you got three likes. England didn't even exist at the time, nor did any of the kingdoms that were to eventually become England. England didn't actually exist until around the 9th or 10th century, 500 years after the Romans left. Welsh and Cornish are the two last remaining remnants of the languages spoken throughout Britain, south of Hadrian's wall, during the time of Boudica.
On the 8th put where he say all wars are cast by raedging ( can't spell.), 1'842 wars (I could be on the number) and only 124 were cost by it.
What about Julius Caesar? When he killed the pirates who captured him
That is a great story. He was a badass, til he got gang murdered. Maybe could have used better people skills. ;)
"et tu brute?" "Yarrrr-" * stab stab stab stab*
ROFLMAO
Errr, fuck it, I cannot follow this monotone 100 miles an hour narative. Jeez.
I hear ya man. Glad I'm not the only one.
Agreed
horrible accent and enunciation
Speaking too fast but nothing wrong with his accent or enunciation.
+fred bluud Boudica nimes etc etc he murders every pronunciation a habit of culture and non universal education😩
your humor in this is so dark I fucking love it
"Dragging our asses halfway around the world, for what?" That's why 500 SS guards were killed. No great loss.
If I had seen what they saw, I would have killed 500 SS guards by myself. All the American soldiers had to go through hell fighting the Nazis only to find out that they were monsters. What surprises me is that only 500 were killed. Even 10,000 SS killed would be a small drop in the bucket.
same thing the american are doing to the muslim countries with drone strikes
dsoutherngent1 I have to agree that outright killing an SS guard is 100 times more humane than gassing and torturing humans that some idiot decides to classify as undesirable.
In that sense, I almost think that killing 500 SS guards was more of a mercy killing rather revenge. I think that we should suggest that the producer of this video make a revised video. It really pales in comparison with the other acts of revenge.
crusty old fart First of all, history is not my specialty even though I enjoy history on the side. Secondly, I would tend to discount anything made into a film or movie because I have yet to see a 100% accurate portrayal. Thirdly, I tend to rely more on historians to accurately portray history.
While I realize that this leads to a level of uncertainty, I do read several historians and occasionally primary sources. All the history books that I have read tend to confirm that there was a holocaust.
Michael Shermer, Skeptic in Chief, who has investigated a respectable number of hoaxes, has determined that the Holocaust was not a hoax. This is unusual in that most of the time after his investigation, he finds unusual claims to be hoaxes.
The last thing that I have to say is that there are no universities who will accept anyone for a professorship position if that person denies the holocaust. Several persons have presented their ideas to me before and attempted to support their ideas with books whose authors have questionable credentials. I am calling stalemate on this one because I am not even going to attempt to persuade anyone nor do I think there is sufficient cause to reconsider.
If by any chance you believe that you know of any sources that might be reliable, please leave me a list for my benefit and the benefit of any inquiring minds. Thank you.
Certainly a great loss for the Western principles of trial and conviction.
This was good. I really enjoyed watching this video. So, cheers and thanks for enriching my knowledge of history and doing it in such an enjoyable way. Nice one 👍☺
I hope you didn't learn that the Count of Monte Cristo is history...
The revenge of Ragnar Lothbrok's sons? :P
i know I'm kind of off topic but do anyone know of a good site to watch new movies online ?
@Randy Elliott Flixportal =)
@Phoenix Koa Thank you, signed up and it seems like they got a lot of movies there :D I really appreciate it!!
@Randy Elliott No problem =)
I had to turn subtitles on to understand what you where saying.
*Were.
If its confusing, its because you are hearing it pronounced correctly for the first time ;P
Seriously!! His horrible accent coupled with the unnecessary speed of dialogue was annoying the shit out of me.
+Obs Rae No. It's because of the way he talks, that being way too fast.
why he has a mild neutral english accent , are you a fucking idiot ?
You speak very fast. Sorry, it is hard to understand. Don't forget: youtube is a global media.
No kidding. English is my native (and only) language. I don't think I understood more than 30% of his words. He is speaking WAY to fast.
so what you are saying is that you are an idiot who doesn't understand your native language, don't blame other people for your stupidity
I'm from California, USA and I have trouble understanding English at all. It's almost impossible when shot past me rapid fire.
Im not a native english speaker, but I could understand that narrator perfectly .
Me either and I also could understand him perfectly.
Never knew that and I am a WWII life long historian. As for the liberation being marred? Perhaps I am too jaded, myself, but sounds like justice to me. The world is not a nice place. As the Germans taught the Jews....and were then taught themselves..... I am a real life American veteran who served with the Army values to the upmost I could. But if I had walked into a German concentration cp in the final days of WWII.....I don't know how I would have reacted but I judge NONE who reacted as they did.
I have no sympathy for these Nazi murderers, nor do I think the GIs who executed them did anything wrong.
Q: What do you call the summary execution of 500 SS concentration camp guards?
A: A good start....
Are people's attention spans so short that this guy has to talk SO FAST through all this? Extremely annoying.
An Indian friend told me, that women who go to police to report rape are likely to get raped by the police, too. That's because in the eyes of the policemen she is already dishonored and it doesn't matter if she gets raped one more time anyways. Of course she probably doesn't receive any help. It's also very likely she gets rejected by her family and society, so it's better to not talk about it for her. The incident where the rape of the young student in the bus which made it to the world press was also just outrageous to the Indian society because she belonged to a higher caste while the assaulter were untouchables.
What...........?
+jelly orwhat That comes off as a reason to speak up MORE. Otherwise it just keeps the whole thing under wraps and lets it all continue. But your comment has nothing to do with what you replied to.
That actually makes a lot of sense. And I understand more why it was so publicised. Thanks for the insight. +BJGvideos Sadly things don't work like that outside the bubble of Europe and North America. With all due respect, there's a lot of eye opening you need to do mate...
+esabria You act like it works like that anywhere. Though you also assumed my location...
I thought for sure that Julius Caesar being held for ransom would be on this list.
Didn't he give them merciful deaths.
+Liamjm he did. He was going to crucify them, but he decided to show mercy by just cutting their throats
Well sources say that he crucified them.
***** And you thought that was brutal enough for this list?
My personal favorite, Tomyris killing and drinking wine from the skull of Cyrus the Great (king of kings) for killing her son. The layers to the story and personal backstory of the individuals involved is just wonderful.
I don't feel at all bad about the nazis being killed.
I was laughing the whole time at that
Yeah, he said it marred the American liberation of the camps, and all I could think was, "Not so much".
+Sam Longmire
Purple lotions touch the oak leaves.
I'd gladly give you both a one-way ticket to east upper-Silesia. Hope you don't mind the heat.
Now I'll enjoy song "Gegrilltes Fleisch" even more, Untermensch.
Same here
awesome awesome awesome. well done new guy. we all love you :)
"Religion is seriously like the cause of all wars ever."
Actually, according to "Encyclopedia of Wars" by Charles Phillips and Alan Axelrod, only 123 of the 1,763 documented wars have a religious cause. That's less than 7%.
My housemate spent one hour in the bathroom once, so in return I took her milk for my cereal
savage
That last guy deserved every bit of that.
They forgot the Viking's "Blood Eagle" execution of King Aella, one of the most brutal way to die
LOL I would say religion is an excuse not a reason
Truth! The reason is power.
ultimately yes
For the people in power perhaps. But not the vast majority of followers who kill and die in that cause. Try telling them it's an excuse and that they don't actually believe.
Yeah that's true depending on which war we're talking about
carm.org/religion-cause-war
Sure wish I could have understood just part of the mumblings flowing from his mouth.
+Phil Lowman
Your altered pencil points have both light and fluid.
I agree.. hard to understand him... talking to fast and mumbling.
Jim Howard
Speed is like a children's swingset with artificial flame. The fluid is still there, but nobody appreciates the color.
+nakyer
kbhkz
Alena Krčálová
Your shower curtain is wanted in 13 different countries for crimes against humanity.
At the battle of Clontarf, Irish hero Brian Boru was killed by Brodir of Mann while he was praying in his tent. After his brother, Ulf the Quarrelsome, found the headless body, he took some men and set out to find Brodir. When he did, he proceeded to cut open Brodir's belly, rip out his intestines, and wind them all around a large tree. The legends say that Brodir did not die until all his intestines were out of his body
The one I thought of upon seeing this list was Ivar the Boneless and King Aella of Northumbria. Though there's some question as to the reality of the incident, since it was recorded in traditional Norse poetry, the story goes that after Aella killed Ivars father by tossing him in a snake pit, Ivar went to war with Aella, defeated him, captured him, and then exacted his familial revenge by cutting away the ribs from Aella's spine, and ripping out his lungs through the holes he'd created.
I think there was a similiar story in 1000 ways to die!
Ah, the Blood Eagle. I was surprised not to see it on here.
Apparently that was actually a myth, invented by scholars to try and sensationalise the brutality of the Vikings.
I seem to remember hearing about it in other places too, originally heard about it researching Ivan the terrible so may or may not be hype.
Kyross Ivan the Terrible?
LOL "Religion is the reason for every war since forever"... I don't know how many people say this and not sure why it persists.
It persists because people who are anti-theist want it to be true, and think if they say it enough, then it will become fact.
In the last 2'000 years not only did religion repress scientific discovery, but yes, religion has had a major factor in all major wars in human history. To look at a recent example, The Vatican celebrated Hitlers birthday during his time of power, and Hitler declared his en-devour as 'the work of christ'. I'm gonna assume you're religious, and one that believes in fairness, equality and peace. But, The Bible and The Quran, in parts, command violence. So this is why people claim religion causes violence and wars, because it's and easy vessel to justify atrocities. Because it does.
Jack Burgess
Yeah, I'm going to have to ask for proof there, or dismiss your claims.
lEazy O G
How was WW2 fought due to religious belief?
Couple things. One, he said that religion was the reason for *nearly* all wars in the history of forever.
Two, while that may be taken to be generally false, what truly starts wars is 'ideology'. Ideology being defined as a 'system of ideas and ideals', religions are ideologies, yes, but so are forms of governance, or even the personal values and principles of one man could be considered an ideology of one. Soldiers that fight for their people do so out of an ideology of 'king and country'. People act in a way as to uphold their own principles, and principles start fights if someone violates them.
In most cases, these ideologies are built around something tangible. King, country, loved ones. Things that are verifiably true in this world and that can be touched. But religion, no matter how hard people balk and scream, isn't a verifiable truth. God as the foundation of a religion has never been observed by anyone, inviting many interpretations of His words, and because of that conflicts that arise over religious ideology are by far the hardest to reconcile. There are no facts to check, no tangible slights to avenge. Just a bunch of people espousing the values of different fictional works and treating them as fact. Perhaps religion wouldn't be as widespread as it is today if more people understood the concept of confirmation bias two thousand years ago.
With such a loose interpretation of factuality of course religious ideologies will rarely see eye to eye on things concerning 'God'. But this is hardly the fault of theists as a whole. The holy Books of certain Gods are so filled with dangerous passages because of a few ancient belligerent embittered cunts who couldn't resist injecting their notions of 'God' into their petty, *mortal* squabbles. A publicity stunt that lasted for millennia.
So yes, religion is not at the root of all wars, but the percentage of wars it does cause tend to never truly end.
Excellent list. Three of these stories I had not heard before. Honestly the final two made my skin crawl.
JUST DO A FUCKIN VIDEO TELLING US ADAM QUIT OR SOMETHING THE SUSPENSE IS UNBEARABLE
He's focusing on WCPW and Whatculture WWE. He did a 3 hour live stream last night, so he is still around.
+Steven Shipway it's whatculture wrestling not wwe
He just did how wwe should book are you dense
he is busy dude. hes the mind behind both this channel AND WCPW. dont worry he still does vids.
What Mossad did to those who were behind the Munich massacre wasn't "murder". It was justice.
Scott Norris maybe but where is our Justice
You're fucking stupid Scott..... Mossad is a terrorist organization from aleph to tav.
Justice? Maybe... Murder? Definitely.
Is that what you jews call justice hey?
Agreed.
I haven't watched it all yet, but the count of monty cristo or w/e was totally in the right on that one. Lol
Word! 👊
they were all in the right.
omg where is Adam??
Managing rampage
Booking DQ finishes
Hes been Revenged.
Damn. And I thought I was a vengeful SOB.
But the video did give me some new ideas.
+WhatCulture
Religion is only responsible for 7% of all wars ever fought since the beginning of recorded history. it would be nice if you were actually done your research before making such an ignorant comment.
Triggered
Responsible, sure, but every war had it's religious aspects. Face it man, organised religion causes people to become animals to each other.
I know. It gets old with that lie constantly being pushed. Or,, religion has killed more people blah blah. They conveniently forget ALL the N.K. leaders, Stalin and Mao.. Who have killed more people than ANYBODY combined in history. AND they are followed by the likes of Muslims (near genocidal acts to Africans over the last several centuries and STILL going, how that gets ignored is astounding), ritual sacrificial cultures such as babylon and the aztecs. But somehow Christianity gets trashed..
AGM_Flatline you need to reread what I wrote. Nothing you said is accurate. As to bringing up old stuff. What did you just do? Again reread what I wrote. It's factual.
Ooooookay a few things. Crusades happened for power, land, and to fight back the Muslims who were collectively fucking up that entire sector of the globe. Also, the church used religion as a tool to gather people. They didn't just all bump into each other at the market and go "Hey.... we're all Catholics/Christians, right?? WANNA FUCK SOME SHIT UP??" and go on a rampage. Read a book. Christians were evil bastards? When? When their god was preaching peace, creating the golden rule, and spouting "love thy neighbor"? Human nature breeds hatred, pal. Not religion. Don't pin all of histories issues on the religious. And lastly, get away from that pathetic "I am a man of science" holier than thou crap. The world has moved further from religion since the mid 1800s and the world has gone further down the shitter. You need to rethink your logic.
...man's inhumanity to man...
DramaHateNation ...damn...you'll have wait your turn..
nothing has changed threw thousands of years !!! ... men seek power!!! how do u think Nostradameus could predict all those verses .... cause he studied man and he new that everything repeats itself ... man is greedy and seeks power !!! just look at the elections !!! same thing...
animals animality? to animals?
When you get all your war history lessons from Family Guy
Number 2 is an awesome example of revenge. The" we don't forgive,we don't forget" sums up me and every american's response to 9/11.
Could you speak a little quicker? LOL
yea, speak faster and in a stupider accent too please, we do barely understand what youre saying!
Slow down a video. Put on 0.75×
You idiots need to calm down a bit
Valentina Bezprezimena First time I had to do just that. Rate of the words are like machine gun here lol
TrixiausNebra: IknowrightIt'sjustsohardtofollowhisslowass!
"Which means he's the reason why your packages are always late, what a bastard."
"Being the reason for all wars in the history of forever." Referring to religion. Your biases are getting the better of you. Obviously that's not true. Even in your video a mere handful of the wars mentioned had anything to do with religion. Not to mention that more often than not religion was only an excuse for the rulers of some nations to expand territory or in some cases throw off the yoke of the Catholic church. I'm not saying there haven't been wars fought over religion, but in the history of man they represent only a small minority of the history of war.
Then there's the Catholic church, an institution that in times past was so vile it's hard to fathom. Ruled by ruthless men who used religion to increase their own power and wealth but believed less than your average next door atheist. Usually at the expense of any true believers who were more often than not their victims rather than their accomplices. The Catholic church is responsible for the murder of more Christians and Jews than any other group with the exception of Islam who exceed the Catholic church only because by this point they've been at it longer. That only because somewhere along the way the Catholic church managed to reform itself to some small degree and stopped their own murder of Christians. Though it might be fair to say they share some culpability for the holocaust, for their silence if nothing else. They STILL to this day are responsible for the persecution of many Christians and Jews even if they have stopped outright murdering them.
People who make such statements as yours gloss over the real motivations involved. To this day religion is used as a smoke screen by the powerful to do things that most religions find repugnant.
Edit: Why in the world is it that when you post comments in UA-cam using Microsoft Edge you can't use paragraphs? I have to edit my comments using Firefox just to form a proper paragraph.
Finally someone has the intelligence to understand this. An unfortunate but true analogy is the argument of gun control in regards to gun violence. A gun, without an owner or a human to use it, can't do any harm. When it is put into the hands of someone righteous or trying to protect their loved ones, it's a good thing. When it is put into the hands of someone who doesn't know how to safely handle or it someone who has bad intentions, there are negative consequences. People use religion almost as a weapon to control people and society while corrupting and distorting its true intentions.
Catholics are christian...
There are many good Christian Catholics yes. But Christianity isn't something you're born into. It's a choice that is born out through your actions. As Jesus said "You shall know them by their fruit." In fact what I'm referring to when I say they killed many Christians I'm including true believers in Christ within the Catholic church.
By itself the the Catholic church is an institution, and for the most part a political institution rather than a religious one. That is borne out through their fruit, just as Jesus said. Even today they are more interested in manipulating the political realm than having any true belief in Christ. Being in the Catholic church doesn't automatically make you a Christian. Having a sincere belief in Jesus as the Saviour who bore our sins on the cross and was resurrected from the dead is what makes you a Christian.
What I'm referring to is the leadership. Particularly in the middle ages. They did a lot of horrible things, including to their own people all for expanding their power and wealth and would destroy anyone who dared say or even believe differently.
People often say things they really believe as a joke and when people really believe this kind of lie, and they do, it's no laughing matter. Yes, it's said in the tone of a joke, but it's also said in a tone that suggests he actually believes this. When someone mocks someone or something in this way, they do so because they believe it, not because they don't.
BarakIII The middle ages weren't a particularly bad time. In fact, the Catholic church had a notably lighter hand than the feuding Germanic lords who would cast them off in favor of greater power by controlling churches of their own.
The Iceni tribe where from East Anglia, not Wales
Did he say Wales? I was just proud that he pronounced it right...
he did indeed Wales
sorry for making the cardinal sin of being grammatically incorrect on the internet
Yeah, but around that time, most of Britain was technically Wales. It's current geographical location is (relatively speaking) recent.
No it wasn't because Wales wasn't a think back then
It kind of was... The Welsh people populated majority of the islands, with the Picts in the North. It wasn't until after the Romans retreated from Britain that the Saxons invaded (a little before A.D 500) and eventually forced the native populace into the West where Wales is now.
Great vid mate'
Keep me coming please!
man, that total war duelling really crack me up..
hiroshima and nagasaki.
I hope you mean the revenge for Pearl Harbor.
nope pear harbour was a military base hiroshima and nagasaki was nomore than genecide
@@simo-qe3lu we will never know for sure, I think that was the best of a worst case scenario.
I liked the speed chatter. a lot of information, in a good amount of time. lovely video.
What really happened in the machine-gunning of 500 Nazi camp guards:
😕👨🏻✈️ Just a slight weapons malfunction, sir.
Everything's fine, how are you?
That was true Justice. Those Americans did the right thing.
Us Russians did that to millions of Nazis.
Everythings.... Situation normal!!!! "Who is this?"
Yeah well except you lived quiet well with sharing Poland and murdering polish people before with the Nazis
Nemo99 Nemo Haha... yeeeaaaa, shouldnt been standing there like pussies.
Rome vs. Carthage? I don't know any other instances in history where the avenger "salted the soil" after killing EVERYBODY IN THE CITY so that NOTHING WOULD EVER GROW THERE AGAIN.
I realize it's just a legend, but what a great legend!
Sparta vs Athens.
completely surprised that the whole Troy thing was ignored. How can you not have that on this list?
When Alexander aimed at the sky, he may have been the first one to die but I'm the one who payed for it. okay I'll stop quoting the musical now bye
Dangit the video put me in 2.0x speed gosh darnit
What you call brutal Game of Thrones calls it Monday.
you know you guys can upload a video up to 15 minutes you don't have to speed talk all the way through. It's not cool, you got yourselves a view but lost yourselves a like and a sub.
I was thinking if I am the only one who thinks this guy wanted to go to the bathroom after finishing.
A bit too fast spoken to be enjoyable
Subscribed mate.
SLOW DOWN GODDAMN
"Religion is the reason for nearly all wars in the history of forever..."
.
Was it worth spending the time typing all of that out?
For such a serious subject I got a good laugh from the moderator, funny guy.
Instead of talking like you had 17,000 cups of coffee then snorted two tons of cocaine .. how about just slowing down? would have been greatly interesting otherwise.
honestly I can't understand you and I consider my english pretty good
Those women should be given a reward for public service.
#8 was the basis of the Game of Thrones 'Red Wedding'.
One of - the Black Wedding & the Glencoe Massacre, both in Scotland have already been noted as the inspiration, but I don't doubt there were plenty of examples for Martin to choose from. And, what makes this one worse; it wasn't limited to Paris- it quickly spread 'round France, as it was part of the larger conflict: the French Wars of Religion - I had French ancestors from Lorraine (a fair way from Paris, you'll agree) who were Huguenots- they were lucky, & managed to leg it to England, somehow- having survived that.
You speak to fast making your narration an annoyance sorry
"Be not deceived; God is not mocked. For whatsoever a man sows, that also shall he reap."
Slow the fuck down please
RubberDildo
seriously
1. The St. Bartholomew's Day massacre took place days after the wedding, and it was sparked by the Protestants declaring war on the government and the concept of monarchy altogether earlier that month, itself provoked on by John Calvin's policies changing. In essence, the Huguenots were acting like a cult, following their founder on even politics. (I'm not Catholic)
2. "Byzantine" is a derogatory term coined by the West, and has no historical validity. I'd expect better from this channel in something that's pretty much standard knowledge in history now. It was still the Roman Empire, and they considered themselves Roman and never "Byzantine". Whether or not the Pope in Rome liked that fact or decided to falsely elevate some Frankish-German warlord named Charles to the title of Roman Emperor is irrelevant.
Also this: www.huffingtonpost.com/rabbi-alan-lurie/is-religion-the-cause-of-_b_1400766.html
I know right!! But oh well, idiots will be idiots... and will make other idiots.... sad world...
Yeah but Byzantium was the name of Constantinople before Constantine spurring on the name of the Empire.
But the Empire ruled from that city was a continuation of the Roman Empire
Christopher Langbein It was actually just a settlement, and only part of Constantinople. Merely a village, one of many villages, that got assimilated into a new and much larger city called New Rome.
So Byzantium is incorrect even there.
The sole reason the term Byzantine was thrown around _long_ after the actual empire, was the West's interest in delegitimizing it as Rome.
It's as ridiculous as if the United States decided to change it's capitol to Miami, then fractures a few centuries later with the original government still ruling in Florida but leading to some crackpot in Houston to declare that his new country is actually the true America and that the Miami regime is actually a different country called the Floridian States.
I can't help but love a good revenge story.
the SS guards deserved it
Wish I could have been there.
Religion was not the reason for “every war, ever”. It was an excuse for SOME wars, but not a reason and certainly not every war. Fighting over religion is a relatively recent invention. Since about the time that, ummmm.... some religions *cough Islam cough* wars have been fought over religion. Yes, the Jews fought to take Canaan from the indigenous population, but that was a short and VERY localized war. Since some religions *cough Islam cough* came about, people really were just honest about their reasons for fighting a war. They fought over land and resources like gold, cattle, and water. The Roman soldiers fought to expand their emperor’s empire and the Chinese fought each other for about 1000 years for the same reason. So get some original ideas, why don’t you.
3:16 this would make a great film. Just saying.
hiroshima & nagasaki
I was about to say, how did that not make this list lol
Wasn't really revenge. It was done to end the war and avoid a land invasion. If they'd wanted revenge they'd have attacked Tokyo but instead it was specifically not targeted.
tendjinn Yeah but..considering the war was essentially over, couldn't they have formed a coalition and worked out some other way?
Slaughtering hundreds of thousands of civilians who have literally nothing to do with the war just shouldn't sit well with any human.
True, although, real talk, they only really needed to brutally level one city to make their point, right?
And, even realer talk, why the fuck did they need to level a city at all?! I think a couple of Atomic bombs dropped on a military base or small town in the general vicinity of Tokyo would have gotten the message across!
Nuking Japan's 7th or 8th AND 11th or 12th largest cities, depending on how you measure cities, kinda seems like unnecessary revenge to me.
Religeon source of all wars ? 'U' high as kite m8 ?
Must have FORGOT hundreds of millions of people killed in the communist revolutions
Abc AwesomeP
Exacly. You can find thousands of wars that had nothing to do with religion. Religion = all wars bullshit is usually spread by people with no clue how states or countries were run through history.
Trace Pillar
"Thousands of wars"...
...like which ones?
Ever heard of Encyclopedia of Wars? Fun stuff. Turns out that out of 1763 wars only about 120 are classified as religious. Maybe Internet Fedora atheists need to read something first and not just *repeat abstract arguments like broken record.
Trace Pillar
Encyclopedia of Wars? Yeah I heard of it. So basically we're just talking about wars of religion vs religion?
Like WW2 isn't considered but Crusades are amirite?
Augustus for bringing all of the people involved with Julius Caesar's murder. Not only did he exact revenge, he was able to rise to power & remove his rivals in one bloody stroke.
It's really hard to understand what you're saying
Ian Davidson it's english
the ss soldiers I scan understand because they diserve it
I find the speakers voice to be unbelievably grating.
better than a twangy accent
love your video
Jesus, Jules was quick to get out of the office during this video😂
Way to go ladies!✊👏
End of WWII. Germany. Soviets. You left it out.
A righteous show of vengeance, indeed...
You have included a fictional character in a video about history, Well done! Alexander Dumas the historian? Well played sir.
To be fair to Genghis Khan, his dealings with the Shah of Khwarezm went more like this :
1/ Genghis Khan sends ambassadors with gifts to draw up a trade agreement with the Shah.
2/ A local governor has the ambassadors murdered, and steals their diplomatic gifts.
3/ Genghis Khan sends more ambassadors to the Shah, with more presents.
4/ The Shah has the ambassadors killed and keeps the gifts.
5/ Genghis Khan asks for an explanation and an apology.
6/ The Shah "flips" Genghis Khan, thinking that Genghis Khan is just a smelly, ignorant nomadic peasant.
7/ Genghis Khan, using the best army in the world, removes Khwarezm from the map.
And 8/ Robert Greene writes a book called The 48 Laws of Power, using this incident to illustrate the rule *Know Who You Are Dealing With. Do Not Offend the Wrong Person*.
I have an alternate name for this list:
The Top 10 Acts Of Revenge In History That Would Make Beatrix Kiddo Go 'WTF?!'
5:20 what film is this clip from?