From Viking long ships to Viking long ships. Maersk is owned and operated by the direct decedents of Vikings. Good luck with transferring the ground vehicles from one ship to the other on the high seas.
If it was a huge semi-submersible cargo carrier cum budget multi role expeditionary helo carrier that could hide at sea it would work, this thing needs an armada similar to a CAG as it's carrying a lot of expensive assets too, either that or install some very comprehensive and cheap hull armor to absorb the SSASM's it'll be constantly at risk of being hit by. It's like the designers are scared to accept the fact it''s a giant easy and juicy target.
Just what any hostile forces desire, a huge, fragile, and very vulnerable basket with most eggs in it. Sadly, this is a trend the US military is slowly adopting. Instead of many cheap and expendable units, now each one (be it jet fighter or warship) is insanely expensive, and the loss of just one unit throws military planning into chaos. Kill that one ship and the financial cost is in many billions, and it sets back any planned military actions if not by many months, years.
@@ricksadler797 Examine the history of wars and the decision makers. In almost every case, it was the Generals and Admirals who decided tactics, deployments, choice of equipment. And generally, they are from an old generation who clung to what worked for them when they were younger. Billy Mitchell pushed hard against the top brass to advance the use of air power, he was court martialed for insubordination. But he persevered and is now credited as the man who created the US Air Force. Mitchell received many honors following his death, including a commission by President Franklin D. Roosevelt as a major general. Heinz Guderian is credited as the father of the blitzkrieg, and he also fought the old guard, they still wanted to use cavalry and artillery tactics from WW1.
That’s been the nature of carriers and transport vessels since the beginning of time. The alternative is a fleet of vessel, with each vessel having 2-4 seaplanes
BS its not armored not meant as a wartime vessel all those poor soldiers! Ok then...you might be a republican and not care about the men and women so what about all those rotary wing aircraft? gone with one torpedo. One JDAM
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Need to figure out what to do with all the cruise ships that are not needed any more
Putting aircraft on cargo ships and panting the cargo ship is aweseome.
It's so much more than that
Kooowel. A modern day Viking Longship.
From Viking long ships to Viking long ships. Maersk is owned and operated by the direct decedents of Vikings. Good luck with transferring the ground vehicles from one ship to the other on the high seas.
If it was a huge semi-submersible cargo carrier cum budget multi role expeditionary helo carrier that could hide at sea it would work, this thing needs an armada similar to a CAG as it's carrying a lot of expensive assets too, either that or install some very comprehensive and cheap hull armor to absorb the SSASM's it'll be constantly at risk of being hit by. It's like the designers are scared to accept the fact it''s a giant easy and juicy target.
so sill question, how are all the vehicles loaded as no sign of ramps,
Just what any hostile forces desire, a huge, fragile, and very vulnerable basket with most eggs in it.
Sadly, this is a trend the US military is slowly adopting. Instead of many cheap and expendable units, now each one (be it jet fighter or warship) is insanely expensive, and the loss of just one unit throws military planning into chaos.
Kill that one ship and the financial cost is in many billions, and it sets back any planned military actions if not by many months, years.
Still fighting the last war , who says military is the new way to do things
@@ricksadler797 Examine the history of wars and the decision makers. In almost every case, it was the Generals and Admirals who decided tactics, deployments, choice of equipment. And generally, they are from an old generation who clung to what worked for them when they were younger.
Billy Mitchell pushed hard against the top brass to advance the use of air power, he was court martialed for insubordination. But he persevered and is now credited as the man who created the US Air Force. Mitchell received many honors following his death, including a commission by President Franklin D. Roosevelt as a major general.
Heinz Guderian is credited as the father of the blitzkrieg, and he also fought the old guard, they still wanted to use cavalry and artillery tactics from WW1.
Should make it military grade with air defense
I remember the Atlantic Conveyor in Falklands war and don't like the idea!
Malvinas war was and still is an enduring lesson to pay attention to.
I dont agree. The Atlantic Conveyor did not have an anti-aircaft defense system. This is a bigger ship you can add a defense weapons
なるほど・・物は使いようですね。コンテナ船を短期間即席改造する事で、ヘリ空母に転用出来るわけだ！！
後は周囲に護衛として、護衛艦を付けてコンテナ船を守れば良い！！ナイス！！
Knowing Maersk line , made in China LOL !
And now we have a presentation on this ps1
Seriously disregarding the craft itself this presentation is looks quite honestly like it was made for a ps1 game
should be able to hide in plain sight. Adversaries will never notice the military aircraft or all the peeps rocking cammies
add F35's
No way to defend itself, would need a fleet to protect it so would be expencive
That’s been the nature of carriers and transport vessels since the beginning of time. The alternative is a fleet of vessel, with each vessel having 2-4 seaplanes
Like US ESB
良いね
Ｎｉｃｅ Ｉｄｅａ！
Great way piss of money,
No tanks.
BS its not armored not meant as a wartime vessel all those poor soldiers! Ok then...you might be a republican and not care about the men and women so what about all those rotary wing aircraft? gone with one torpedo. One JDAM
Holy fuck you're an idiot. Especially when it comes to that Republican comment.
Very few ships are armoured these days.