I own a 2007 Tundra. The only thing I’ve replaced in 17 years, is a fog light bulb. The battery of course, which I replaced after 12 years. That’s unbelievable !
WHAT? The Toyota Tundra Turbo V6 is reliable??? Compared to the naturally aspirated V8? SORRY.... NO !!! And the Turbo 4 cylinder Tacoma? More reliable than the naturally aspirated V6? SORRY... NO... AGAIN !!!
Generally Toyota, Honda and Mazdas 2013 or newer are the most reliable. For minivans, test drive a used Dodge/Chrysler base model that drives the best and costs so much less than the Honda and Toyota the lower reliability is less of a problem. If you plan to drive it 300 thousand miles, probably stay away from a turbo engine, an older hybrid, or a recent design more of a gamble for reliability 20 years from now.
True. And it sucks. On the other hand, did any ford or other moron EVER recall ANY screw up voluntarily? Three tries to get the answer right. Here is the hint: HELL NO!
@@nofyfb123 Your little rant is cute but please don't spread false information. The truth is YES, Ford has done voluntary recalls and has been forced in some cases. Toyota has been forced to recall in the past and has been caught deceiving. Let's keep things real.......
None of the vehicles you are bragging about getting high odometer readings have anything in common with their modern equivalent. Several generations of the Odyssey have well known fatal flaws. As a Gen Xer, I simply am not ready to believe a turbo will provide well over 100000 miles of reliable service. Sorry.
The claims for a million plus miles are meaningless without knowing the service record. How many rebuilds, repairs or replacements of motors, transmissions and differentials? Not to mention everything else.
Honda made a huge mistake dropping the K24A, when you mate it to a 5sp manual trans it can easily make 500k or more as long as you change the oil every 5k miles. with pure synthetic. And the manual trans keeps it interesting, even fun to drive.
The only Japanese cars in the UK with a 2 litre engine , manual gearbox and no turbo is the Mazda 3, CX30 and CX5. I will pick one when my W204 is scrapped
I own the 2021 Camry hybrid, 57MPG and very very quit amazing interior design, comfortable ride, best looking exterior design, wide leg room....what can I say about this car. I wish all cars were made like this. No surprise Camry is on the top list. Well done Toyota.
This is all very American biased and like some of the comments say, you are showing the new versions but the old models are the ones doing the actual high miles. In Europe I would add the Skoda Octavia (the taxi favourite) they are still bullet proof, reliable cars even now as brand new. As for Electric cars, I would put the old shape Nissan Leaf in the top spot. They are a Marmite car but you can't say they are not reliable. I have had several old Toyotas from the mid 80s and 90s and yes they are a good but slow performance cars. I also have a 2008 Patriot Jeep which I have to fix every few months but if you want to own a reliable car go for the least amount of electronics and service it more than manufacturers stated guide lines
Camry 2011. After 127k complete disaster. $10k to fix suspension wear and tear. Maybe engine is very good. But does it make sense to put so much money in endless repairs?
New hondas may hv good engines but their cvt transmissions r crazy problematic. In my country there are hundreds of documented cases of broken steel belt in their cvts. But toyota's cvt seem to be much more reliable.
Must have did this vehicle before Toyota issued a recall on the new tundras V6 engine that is self destructing itself by spinning main bearing do to machining debris 🤦🏽♂️🤦🏽♂️
Toyota Tundra Engine failure now going on two years & Toyota Sequoia Engine & Transmission failures&Honda Civic Electric steering failure & Acura Entry level car the same Power Steering failure
If it has a GDI engine, it's not going to last. My 2009 Mercury Grand Marquis has 260,000 and runs like brand new and burns no oil. The 1.5 turbo in my brother's CRV died at 80,000. The second engine is burning more oil than gas. GDI is a disaster for consumers.
It's undeniable that Civics are reliable! According to recent surveys to owners however, they seem to be experiencing more issues than owners of other cars on the list. Of course this is subject to how different cars' owners use their cars. We just focus on explaining and dissecting Consumer Reports data. All in all, you cannot go wrong with a Civic 100%.
The older engines, when properly maintained, seem to have the least problems and last a long time. I have a 2014 F-150 STX with the non-turbo 3.7 V6 base engine. At 260K and zero engine issues to date.
@@ksamos When I bought my Silverado I was actually looking for an STX Ford F-150 with the 3.7 but couldn't find one in my area. I then went to the Chevy dealer and bought my '12 brand new.
Hello! Thank you for your comment! Yes the 2025 has been released, but since Consumer Reports hasn’t done a throughout road test report for the 2025 version yet, we have not released its info here!
@@olympbarca3313 Stand corrected - I was only aware of ECVT's that are a marvel of engineering. Traditional CVT's are junk, and it's sad to see Toyota using them. On the other hand, maybe (hopefully) Toyota makes them more reliable than honda, subaru, and the rest. I noticed that for trucks - even hybrids - they still use traditional non-cvt transmissions. My 2021 Rav4 Hybrid has ECVT, and I totally love it. My 2019 Tundra has a traditional 6-speed. Good news is that at my age, my vehicles should last [my] lifetime especially since I work from home and don't drive like I used to.
@@wayneyarrell641 , how do you know? I owned a few Toyotas . 1968 Toyota Sprinter, A 1974 Toyota Celica, A 1978 Toyota Tercel and a 1980 Toyota Camry. These cars are cheap. They work ok but prone to problems. Suspension, Alternator, Cooling system and interior items such as seats, door panels, speakers. How many did you own? I owned a few other brands too and frankly they were better than the Toyotas I owned. These cars that I owned are just cheap cars. Tell me about yours.
@@goochi5544 I not only have owned numerous Toyotas starting with 1972 Corona. I currently own two. There were close to a dozen in between. Most importantly, I spent nearly twenty years in the field as a Mechanical Breakdown Inspector investigating mechanical failures. Out of about thousand inspections A YEAR, there was maybe - MAYBE! - one Toyota. And most because of lack of maintenance or abuse.
Rather than naturally-aspirated engines. Turbos create pressure within the engine, which can cause reliability issues along with elevated oil temperatures,
I own a 2007 Tundra. The only thing I’ve replaced in 17 years, is a fog light bulb. The battery of course, which I replaced after 12 years. That’s unbelievable !
WHAT? The Toyota Tundra Turbo V6 is reliable???
Compared to the naturally aspirated V8?
SORRY.... NO !!!
And the Turbo 4 cylinder Tacoma?
More reliable than the naturally aspirated V6?
SORRY... NO... AGAIN !!!
I agree wholeheartedly!
Generally Toyota, Honda and Mazdas 2013 or newer are the most reliable. For minivans, test drive a used Dodge/Chrysler base model that drives the best and costs so much less than the Honda and Toyota the lower reliability is less of a problem. If you plan to drive it 300 thousand miles, probably stay away from a turbo engine, an older hybrid, or a recent design more of a gamble for reliability 20 years from now.
10 day ago this was posted? Three weeks ago Toyota recalled over 102,000 Tundras for major engine problems.
True. And it sucks. On the other hand, did any ford or other moron EVER recall ANY screw up voluntarily? Three tries to get the answer right. Here is the hint: HELL NO!
@@nofyfb123 Your little rant is cute but please don't spread false information. The truth is YES, Ford has done voluntary recalls and has been forced in some cases. Toyota has been forced to recall in the past and has been caught deceiving. Let's keep things real.......
No one is buying a minivan for excitement or handling
But they are a damn comfortable for family.
I laugh at the Odyssey transmission craziness
Unfortunately, the past few years of the Honda Accord can barely make it through a year. But the Civic is still allright.
Try the 2025 Camry!
Dam how did the Honda Civic not make the list
None of the vehicles you are bragging about getting high odometer readings have anything in common with their modern equivalent. Several generations of the Odyssey have well known fatal flaws. As a Gen Xer, I simply am not ready to believe a turbo will provide well over 100000 miles of reliable service. Sorry.
Starting prices for all these cars are much higher. Starting price to me is the out the door price.
The claims for a million plus miles are meaningless without knowing the service record. How many rebuilds, repairs or replacements of motors, transmissions and differentials? Not to mention everything else.
Good Point! We’ll make sure to cover those in detail next time. Thanks Wes!
Honda made a huge mistake dropping the K24A, when you mate it to a 5sp manual trans it can easily make 500k or more as long as you change the oil every 5k miles. with pure synthetic. And the manual trans keeps it interesting, even fun to drive.
The only Japanese cars in the UK with a 2 litre engine , manual gearbox and no turbo is the Mazda 3, CX30 and CX5. I will pick one when my W204 is scrapped
I own the 2021 Camry hybrid, 57MPG and very very quit amazing interior design, comfortable ride, best looking exterior design, wide leg room....what can I say about this car. I wish all cars were made like this. No surprise Camry is on the top list. Well done Toyota.
Couldn't agree more! Thanks for sharing!
Like red inside nice
Yeah, good luck to go over 100k miles with those small Toyota and Honda turbo engines.
Unfortunately you can’t find new Corollas anywhere without a 9 month wait.
Just three days ago, my ex bought a brand new Corolla Hybrid AWD in NYC. I know - I helped her navigate through the stealer's enginuity.
It’s insane that it is still an issue =\
4Runner not on the list? Hmmmmmm
This is all very American biased and like some of the comments say, you are showing the new versions but the old models are the ones doing the actual high miles. In Europe I would add the Skoda Octavia (the taxi favourite) they are still bullet proof, reliable cars even now as brand new. As for Electric cars, I would put the old shape Nissan Leaf in the top spot. They are a Marmite car but you can't say they are not reliable. I have had several old Toyotas from the mid 80s and 90s and yes they are a good but slow performance cars. I also have a 2008 Patriot Jeep which I have to fix every few months but if you want to own a reliable car go for the least amount of electronics and service it more than manufacturers stated guide lines
Our last Nissan Mirano was the most unreliable car we have ever owned!
Camry 2011. After 127k complete disaster. $10k to fix suspension wear and tear. Maybe engine is very good. But does it make sense to put so much money in endless repairs?
Rav4 lasts much longer than CRV.
I have a 2014 RAV 4 XLE with 286k on it.....still running!
@@veronicalee5937i have mine 2016 XLE 59k miles only engine noise like new car i hope i will hit 1 million miles
@@veronicalee5937 Just bought a 2023 RAV4 - glad to hear that!
I have a 2000 Honda CR-V EX with 298K miles. Still going strong. I should make it to 300K in the next month or so.
@@dustinleonsky4513 old Honda doing well new one they are POC
Tundra body falls apart before the engine wears out.
Mazda is where it's at now.
Toyona and honda are still better.
Sorry but the V6 turbo is abig lemon and anything after 2010 ??????
Older Toyota and Honda are reliable. But, new Toyota and Honda are not reliable like older ones.
He do you say modern? I have a 2022 Tacoma with zero issues in 32,000 miles and 2.5 years of driving. We have a Honda Pilot 2024 that is perfect.
I wish car companies stop making zo my h gray colors enough already need briwns greens other nicer colors inside and out
The tundra and taco lose their crown at the moment due to the new powertrains.
New hondas may hv good engines but their cvt transmissions r crazy problematic. In my country there are hundreds of documented cases of broken steel belt in their cvts. But toyota's cvt seem to be much more reliable.
Must have did this vehicle before Toyota issued a recall on the new tundras V6 engine that is self destructing itself by spinning main bearing do to machining debris 🤦🏽♂️🤦🏽♂️
Is there a mini van that can handle like a Ferrari?
We all wish there is 😂
What about chevy alot people have chevys equinox trailblazer i looking at and outback
Chevy's are junk. Save your money.
@@bills5009 Outbacks rava four Corolla
@@teresaallen3045 Any of those is a better choice.
Toyota-Honda-Honda-Toyota
Toyota Tundra Engine failure now going on two years & Toyota Sequoia Engine & Transmission failures&Honda Civic Electric steering failure & Acura Entry level car the same Power Steering failure
A car that can't last 20 years if looked after isn't any good .
Lexus LS 460 will outlast all of these!
Yea, but how affordable is it to the average working person.
If it has a GDI engine, it's not going to last. My 2009 Mercury Grand Marquis has 260,000 and runs like brand new and burns no oil. The 1.5 turbo in my brother's CRV died at 80,000. The second engine is burning more oil than gas. GDI is a disaster for consumers.
What about the civic? lol civic & Camry r the same in it’s class👌🏻
It's undeniable that Civics are reliable! According to recent surveys to owners however, they seem to be experiencing more issues than owners of other cars on the list. Of course this is subject to how different cars' owners use their cars. We just focus on explaining and dissecting Consumer Reports data. All in all, you cannot go wrong with a Civic 100%.
First, they are not in the same class. Corolla-Civic and Camry-Accord are.
Blah, blah, blah. The Silverado with the old timer 4.3 V-6 or the non-DOD 5.3 or 4.8 will outlast anything on the list.
The older engines, when properly maintained, seem to have the least problems and last a long time. I have a 2014 F-150 STX with the non-turbo 3.7 V6 base engine. At 260K and zero engine issues to date.
@@ksamos When I bought my Silverado I was actually looking for an STX Ford F-150 with the 3.7 but couldn't find one in my area. I then went to the Chevy dealer and bought my '12 brand new.
@@chuckgladfelterhow is the rust out or lifters,pistons and anything else you can think of
@@bradzimmerman3171 lifters aren't an issue on these. I'm in the South so no rust yet.
I have a 95 Blazer with the 4.3 V6. It is still rolling with only 220k miles.
No American brands❤
Out of date info here. 2025 Camrys have been out now for 5 months.
Hello! Thank you for your comment! Yes the 2025 has been released, but since Consumer Reports hasn’t done a throughout road test report for the 2025 version yet, we have not released its info here!
All these car company's using CVT,s and these new turbo,s for engines good luck😢
Toyota doesn't.
@@nofyfb123YES they are. They have twin turbos too
@@olympbarca3313 Stand corrected - I was only aware of ECVT's that are a marvel of engineering. Traditional CVT's are junk, and it's sad to see Toyota using them. On the other hand, maybe (hopefully) Toyota makes them more reliable than honda, subaru, and the rest. I noticed that for trucks - even hybrids - they still use traditional non-cvt transmissions. My 2021 Rav4 Hybrid has ECVT, and I totally love it. My 2019 Tundra has a traditional 6-speed. Good news is that at my age, my vehicles should last [my] lifetime especially since I work from home and don't drive like I used to.
All Japanese. What does that tell you about American and German cars?
Yeah we heard that before. Still I will buy german and american cars. Here in Europe are more reliable the german cars
It's a van. Who cares. Buy an Accura if you want luxury.
Those Toyota's are just too ugly. The Japanese manufacturers don't make an attractive interior either for some reason.
Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder...
Toyota reliability is a myth
No, it's not.
Absolutely not, clearly you have never owned one!
@@wayneyarrell641 , how do you know? I owned a few Toyotas . 1968 Toyota Sprinter, A 1974 Toyota Celica, A 1978 Toyota Tercel and a 1980 Toyota Camry. These cars are cheap. They work ok but prone to problems. Suspension, Alternator, Cooling system and interior items such as seats, door panels, speakers. How many did you own? I owned a few other brands too and frankly they were better than the Toyotas I owned. These cars that I owned are just cheap cars. Tell me about yours.
@@goochi5544 I not only have owned numerous Toyotas starting with 1972 Corona. I currently own two. There were close to a dozen in between. Most importantly, I spent nearly twenty years in the field as a Mechanical Breakdown Inspector investigating mechanical failures. Out of about thousand inspections A YEAR, there was maybe - MAYBE! - one Toyota. And most because of lack of maintenance or abuse.
Honda. Toyota has lost its reliability. Civics with 1.5 t. Cvt transmission. Toyota tundra. And Tacoma have lost their reputation
Wow. Forst time I heard that. What happened?😊
@@user-mu8ty7vc3ybecause of EPA requirements, they’re going with turbo
Rather than naturally-aspirated engines. Turbos create pressure within the engine, which can cause reliability issues along with elevated oil temperatures,
Only specific vehicles/models not all.
Trust toyota to overcome these turbo problems as they hv done countless times
A 2002 Odyssey would have a 210hp V-6 that was in the Accord. Mine was over 200k and I had to let it go due to moving. 🥲🥲🥲