Sorcery: The TCG that banned digital art

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 30 чер 2024
  • Sorcery Starter Decks: amzn.to/423npoU
    Sorcery Booster Boxes: bit.ly/SorceryCovenant
    Patreon: bit.ly/QBPatreon
    Old-School DnD newsletter: bit.ly/TheGlatisant
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    My RPGs (PDF): bit.ly/QuestingBeastPDFs
    My RPGs (Print): bit.ly/QuestingBeastBooks
    Newsletter: bit.ly/TheGlatisant
    Patreon: bit.ly/QBPatreon
    Amazon recommendations: amzn.to/3RwpZzU
    Questing Beast merch: bit.ly/QBMerch
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    My blog: bit.ly/QuestingBlog
    Must-read blog posts: bit.ly/OSRposts
    The best RPG blogs: bit.ly/OSRblogs
    What is the OSR?: bit.ly/PrincipApoc
    Send a review copy or advertise: bit.ly/ContactQB
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    This channel makes use of affiliate links, which help support Questing Beast at no cost to you.
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    QUESTING KNIGHT PATRONS
    Allen Opperman, Angel of the Dawn, Doug Vieira, Dwayne Boothe, Dwiz, Elliot Heigert, fikle, J. Case Tompkins, James Endres, Jose Trujillo, Klozee, Kurtis Bright, LeMorteGames, marzan, Paulie, Ricardo Sedan, RollStats
  • Ігри

КОМЕНТАРІ • 140

  • @QuestingBeast
    @QuestingBeast  5 місяців тому +17

    Sorcery Starter Decks: amzn.to/423npoU
    Sorcery Booster Boxes: bit.ly/SorceryCovenant
    Patreon: bit.ly/QBPatreon
    Old-School DnD newsletter: bit.ly/TheGlatisant

  • @VanAleph
    @VanAleph 5 місяців тому +132

    I like how every card is borderless. No need to make ten different levels of artificially scarce alternate treatments, just make every card look good.

  • @felixdaniels37
    @felixdaniels37 5 місяців тому +55

    I like this card game as a celebration of physical media and a platform for artists to explore their creativity. In an era of constant art grifts and aggressive corporate pushing for making the arts obsolete, this is sorely needed.

  • @RavensbladeDX
    @RavensbladeDX 5 місяців тому +89

    Early Magic had a very wide range of art. Some of it was iconic and remains very evocative pieces of art even today and some of it was very .... utilitarian. But it all added to the great feel of early Magic where every booster pack held the chance for wondorous discovery. Good to see that at least some people still remember that feeling and are striving to keep it alive. Will definitely check out Sorcery! Thanks for sharing it with us.

    • @zenithquasar9623
      @zenithquasar9623 5 місяців тому +2

      I am not against consistency through a set, but MtG atm only gets really inspired art every now and then.

    • @yellowpie
      @yellowpie 5 місяців тому

      @@zenithquasar9623 I think mtg has been getting a lot better at putting out diverse, inspired art in recent years. There's still "the contemporary mtg art style," but they're not afraid to bring on artists who do something completely different. Jeremy Wilson, Eli Minaya, John Tedrick, and say what you will about Booster Fun and Secret Lairs, but they undeniably make sure Magic has no shortage of unique art. (And even within "the contemporary mtg art style," there's a fair share of masterpieces like Storm the Seedcore.)

    • @bebopbountyhead
      @bebopbountyhead 4 місяці тому +1

      Just look at cards like Stasis and Land Tax: you don't need art that is technically breathtaking to be effective in card games. What is missing is the feeling of novelty that gave different cards their unique "feel."

  • @JackCharlesBrightwell
    @JackCharlesBrightwell 5 місяців тому +60

    It kind of sounds like you could use this as a worldbuilding tool, especially for D&D. Play a game of this and take a photo of the layout of the sites at the end of the game and you kind of have a hexmap. Heck what happened in the game could even the background lore of that setting

    • @idrisabdullah3492
      @idrisabdullah3492 5 місяців тому +8

      That might be super fun. A whole quest could be made regarding rival wizards or something and the most you’d have to do is make stats for the monsters

    • @DragonBoi3789
      @DragonBoi3789 5 місяців тому +6

      The inverse could work too. Have the PCs act as agents for the wizard and acquire assets for the final battle. Whatever the PCs accomplish translates to more cards available for their wizard's deck.

  • @reversegoat3260
    @reversegoat3260 5 місяців тому +30

    Hearing about the placement mechanics reminded me of how my brother and I first played MtG. We thought lands created "lanes" and you could only attack down those lanes. Creatures in front of those lands could defend them and, as per our non-verbal agreement, you could only "stack" four lands. Lands also had to be the same type, so you couldn't mix say forests and mountains. Thus every non-basic also had its own "lane". We also had an idea that unblocked monsters could also steal unguarded artifacts instead of damaging the player, but it never came up in play.

    • @benjaminloyd6056
      @benjaminloyd6056 5 місяців тому +3

      What a funny misunderstanding.

    • @dmc362
      @dmc362 5 місяців тому +8

      That misunderstanding could be worked into a game.

    • @farhavens
      @farhavens 5 місяців тому +3

      That's very similar to sorcery, funny enough. Unguarded artifacts (like the rolling bolder mentioned in the video), is free for anyone to use. That means if the minion you have equip with flaming sword dies in enemy territory, your opponents minions can pick it up and use it against you.

    • @DanielRuiz-om2ct
      @DanielRuiz-om2ct 5 місяців тому +2

      In sorcery you pick up an infinite amount of unguarded artifacts and still attack.

  • @yeskermit5974
    @yeskermit5974 5 місяців тому +26

    This looks amazing, thank you. I player mtg in the early 90s and the feel was totally different. I also tried to build a grid structure to play on back then too, for more strategic depth. The designers of this new game seem to have created exactly what I wanted to play!

  • @KammaKhazi
    @KammaKhazi 5 місяців тому +34

    Nobody tell Hasbro, they’ll send the pinkertons round.

    • @drillerdev4624
      @drillerdev4624 5 місяців тому +5

      Nobody expects the Hasbro Pinkertons!

    • @kontrarien5721
      @kontrarien5721 5 місяців тому +5

      Their chief weapon is surprise. Surprise and fear . . .

    • @drillerdev4624
      @drillerdev4624 5 місяців тому +4

      @@kontrarien5721 Surprise and fear, and violence

  • @Ryan-so3il
    @Ryan-so3il 5 місяців тому +15

    Holy crap Ben. Sorcery FTW

  • @johnfreymuth4808
    @johnfreymuth4808 5 місяців тому +7

    Such an awesome surprise seeing you cover Sorcery! My love of OSR games really is what piqued my interest in Sorcery to begin with, so seeing you cover it here has really brought things full circle.

  • @bunbun6161
    @bunbun6161 5 місяців тому +8

    I just got my precon decks yesterday and played three games already. It was a nice surprise to see you cover it.

  • @faucetrememberly2399
    @faucetrememberly2399 5 місяців тому +8

    Sorcery content from Questing Beast??? no bloody way!!! This is brilliant. Have any cards you want a copy of, Ben? I'd love to trade! 😅

  • @jasonGamesMaster
    @jasonGamesMaster 5 місяців тому +11

    I dig it. Haven't played MTG (as in bought new cards) since.... 2005ish? But this sounds pretty cool. There was a card shop that sold commons and uncommons for 5 cents if you bought 20 or more. My wife (then girlfriend) used to have cheap nerd dates in which she and I would make decks for each other based on what we thought the other would like. I still use the blue wizard/bird deck she made me lol

  • @walterwhitetailfeather9998
    @walterwhitetailfeather9998 5 місяців тому +1

    The different artists create a more intriguing visual for the game and the formatting gives it cohesion. The grid sounds fun.

  • @TitularHeroine
    @TitularHeroine 5 місяців тому +17

    I'm not into CCGs -- but wow, you make a compelling case for this one. I love that world-building element and the abstract aspect is really intriguing. Thank you!

  • @benjaminloyd6056
    @benjaminloyd6056 5 місяців тому +1

    Thanks for covering this Ben. Ive had my eye on this one for a while. Something about it just gets my Fantasy ideas churning!

  • @Kingspawn000
    @Kingspawn000 5 місяців тому +4

    Wow! Just bought into this game last week. Very timely! It’s great that the art being fantastic isn’t carrying the game, it’s genuinely very cool in how it plays as well. Very narrative and tells a great story!

  • @MelRiffe
    @MelRiffe 5 місяців тому +9

    Thanks for the review. I've been curious about MTG but not enough to try. Seems like Sorcery will be interesting, especially if it has a Chess-like feel.

  • @SpookyGroovyPolitoCatMum
    @SpookyGroovyPolitoCatMum 5 місяців тому +6

    I just want to interject that early magic was indeed a lot like a chess game. And early magic had 100% painted art. I think I may have to check out this game and recommend it to my local game store.

    • @solaris_cc4353
      @solaris_cc4353 5 місяців тому

      I'd only play early Magic if I wasn't born too late to enjoy those cards without paying a fortune. Sorcery could be a good compromise.

    • @MrRayRockstar
      @MrRayRockstar 5 місяців тому

      30 years is a long time

  • @Khaldryn
    @Khaldryn 5 місяців тому +3

    Having a variety in the "quality" of art really reminds me of the old days of mtg. Very nostalgic. I don't consider it a bad thing, I love it in fact. Thanks for intriducing me to a new TCG.

  • @jordanmatthew6315
    @jordanmatthew6315 5 місяців тому +7

    shadow wizard money gang, we gonna be casting spells; waiting for the nuclear bomb card - funny AF if they do.

  • @michaelbird9148
    @michaelbird9148 5 місяців тому +9

    Cool game developer! I like their approach to rarity.

  • @MarketResearchReading114
    @MarketResearchReading114 5 місяців тому +14

    At this point it might be the only way to honestly know if it's not ai. Given that artists will soon have to compete against an ai stealing their works to compete with themselves basically... getting more effective over a smaller and smaller data set. Well I would consider some notion of this to get more popular.

  • @jessedotson5998
    @jessedotson5998 5 місяців тому +4

    This video is definitely a pleasant suprise

  • @Dratio
    @Dratio 5 місяців тому +2

    I don't dislike digital art inherently but the results here are plain to see that there's something about the traditional methods that a lot of current digital art lacks. I lack the art vocabulary to describe it though. Something about the textures and fine grittiness of detail? I feel like digital art tends to be too smooth.

  • @cosmiccowboy9358
    @cosmiccowboy9358 5 місяців тому +1

    Not sure how I missed you having a newsletter

  • @benpuffer7891
    @benpuffer7891 5 місяців тому +4

    Great video. Thank you for branching into something a bit different.

  • @jovanstar
    @jovanstar 11 днів тому

    One of the best ccgs I've played that has literally pulled me back to collectible card games. I used to play magic heavily for decades and quit due to power creep, but Sorcery and it's grid based and region based play has pulled me back in. Because of this video, I have since went out and bought multiple beta boxes and can't wait for Arthurian Legends.

  • @goawaygosh
    @goawaygosh 5 місяців тому +9

    I was really interested in getting into MtG but I didn’t like how most of the art in the recently released sets looked and preferred the look of the older sets.
    These cards look great, exactly what I’m into.
    Hopefully I can pick some packs up.

    • @goawaygosh
      @goawaygosh 5 місяців тому

      I bought a booster box and the precon set
      Looking forward to them arriving.

  • @Irgendwaslanges
    @Irgendwaslanges 5 місяців тому +1

    Wow this is like Magic and the boardgame dixit combined! First it didnt peak my interest "ah another magic clone" but after watching your explanation I am hooked!

  • @AnonymousOtters
    @AnonymousOtters 5 місяців тому +4

    Looks awesome! Wonder why it hasn't got more attention, especially with WotC being such a hot topic these days. I know plenty of people that would be happy for a similar TCG, but don't want to put any more money in that companies wallets

    • @nibernator
      @nibernator 5 місяців тому +1

      The game is steadily growing. It is still in Beta, but the company is scaling up their operations.
      The reddit community and discord are getting bigger and bigger everyday!

  • @PeculiarNotions
    @PeculiarNotions 5 місяців тому +2

    Sounds interesting. I may have to look into this game some more.

  • @jarosawknas8947
    @jarosawknas8947 5 місяців тому +5

    Napiszę w języku ojczystym. Te karty są po prostu piękne! No i Twój kanał też mi się podoba. Gry fabularne łączą ludzi z różnych kontynentów.

  • @artistpoet5253
    @artistpoet5253 5 місяців тому +1

    I just heard of this game. The owner of my long time LFGS is super excited about it and if he's into it, it must be pretty good. I like the correlation you make to DnD as I got into MtG when the owner of a now out-of-business comics and games store sold me on it as "DnD but with cards'. From that point on, I always play acted the role of the Planeswalker and would even give my creatures names and do sound effects and funny voices. Even my tournament opponents would eventually get in on the fun. I haven't played a tournament in nearly a decade. Everyone is just so serious.

  • @ElderGoblinGames
    @ElderGoblinGames 5 місяців тому +3

    This is really cool! I love the art. I will be buying a set for inspiration alone. I hope the game is fun too!

  • @jynirax
    @jynirax 5 місяців тому +5

    This looks really interesting. Very cool art and the directional play looks very appealing.

  • @greatestcait
    @greatestcait 5 місяців тому +2

    If I had friends to play it with, I would probably get into this game.
    Heck, I'll probably still buy some cards, if only to look at the gorgeous art...

  • @lexlane9353
    @lexlane9353 5 місяців тому +1

    Wow QB you brought up a lot of good points. I gave up on magic years and years ago, because I wouldn't spend the money needed to build your deck to competent power levels. I just wasn't into that. I like the balancing your mentioned to allow newer players to feel they have a feel chance. Nice review.

  • @jonothanthrace1530
    @jonothanthrace1530 5 місяців тому +4

    "Tap" being on the cards seems risky to me, legally.

    • @Sierra99
      @Sierra99 5 місяців тому +9

      Afaik that patent has expired

    • @jonothanthrace1530
      @jonothanthrace1530 5 місяців тому +3

      @@Sierra99I was not aware of this, good to know!

    • @ConfessionGang
      @ConfessionGang 5 місяців тому +2

      tap is not a copy rightable term, but the mtg symbol is so any game( many other games do can use tap) can use it, but not the symbol mtg tap symbol that is copyrighted

  • @caseydillard5286
    @caseydillard5286 5 місяців тому +2

    The crossover we all needed. Love Sorcery!

  • @tacky4237
    @tacky4237 5 місяців тому +2

    LOVE the look, but not sure if i want to play it.

  • @CollectorArthouse
    @CollectorArthouse 5 місяців тому +2

    This was very very well done. Thank you for taking the time to learn the game and really do a fantastic job of articulating the brilliant creativity in the game design and featuring its beautiful artwork.

  • @Jigglupuff22
    @Jigglupuff22 5 місяців тому +1

    9:45 KNACK BABYEEEEEE

  • @ayberkkarakas6898
    @ayberkkarakas6898 5 місяців тому

    It is amazing to see the full art for foil cards on the back but I couldn't get how to hide that from the opponent while playing.

    • @Lorry_Draws
      @Lorry_Draws 4 місяці тому

      Just use sleeves, same size for magic the gathering cards (standard size)

  • @thed0nz
    @thed0nz 5 місяців тому +4

    WOW, so happy you covered this game. I played it a few months back and immediately bought a few packs along with the starter sets pretty much EXCLUSIVELY for the art. It is evocative, captivating, and utterly beautiful. The most amazing art in the TCG world, by FAR, IMHO.

  • @kalleendo7577
    @kalleendo7577 5 місяців тому +2

    Awesome!

  • @Jo-Jet
    @Jo-Jet 5 місяців тому +1

    I kind of wish I could get back into CCG, but then I remember both the years and money I wasted on both Yugioh & Pokemon, as well as a bunch of random anime inspired CCG that never went anywhere (like the early Digimon, YuYu Haskusho, and such).
    As well as the fact I don't have the time to join local CCG groups to play it.
    Still, this looks pretty fun.

  • @rafindeed
    @rafindeed 23 дні тому

    as a concept artist the idea of only using physical art is great. it gives great value to the game and a very specific art direction more like the old school style of magic

  • @lexlane9353
    @lexlane9353 5 місяців тому +1

    Maybe I'm crazy but it makes me think of Spellfire. I haven't looked at those cards in a while.

  • @davidmaynard8876
    @davidmaynard8876 5 місяців тому +1

    The game is awesome. Its unique and truly feels like playing chess with badass art cards.

  • @Zectari
    @Zectari 5 місяців тому +1

    Had to google the term TCG :D

  • @fortidogi8620
    @fortidogi8620 5 місяців тому +2

    Are the foils legal for play with how their backs are?

    • @QuestingBeast
      @QuestingBeast  5 місяців тому +5

      The assumption for tournament play is that cards are in sleeves with opaque backs

  • @glaedth
    @glaedth 5 місяців тому

    I love sorcery for what it is as a fan of fantasy and board games, but the compatitive TCG player who plays Flesh and Blood in me is infuriated with how vague the cards can be at times. I was playing a game with my brother and we looked at a card and none of us knew what it was supposed to do, so we pulled out our phones and went to find out and we still didn't figure it out so we had to join the Sorcery discord and ask in the rulings channel to see how to use the card correctly. I remember feeling that a card felt way too strong because of my interpretation of the vague text and after the game I once again asked on the discord and found out that both me and my opponent completely misunderstood how the card works making it grossly OP because of how vague the text is. Love the game tho as a kitchen table board game to get people into TCGs.

  • @yellowpie
    @yellowpie 5 місяців тому

    I think you and I have fairly different opinions on game design, but this video definitely has gotten me interested in this game.

  • @tisisonlytemporary
    @tisisonlytemporary 5 місяців тому

    Damn, seems fun. Gonna be difficult to convince a friend to also play tho

  • @WonOneWun
    @WonOneWun 5 місяців тому +1

    anyone knowsleeves he's using?

  • @Matti_Mattsen
    @Matti_Mattsen 2 місяці тому

    a damn shame its nearly impossible to acquire in Eu. I've been an old mtg player since 1996 and i love the nostalgic feel. But alas, not available anywhere. Really unfortunate

  • @ZackeroniAndCheese
    @ZackeroniAndCheese 5 місяців тому

    I am a huge fan of the art.
    What I'm not sold on is that the game requires keeping cards aligned in a grid.
    Having to worry about rows and columns aligning with your opponent makes the game feel more like a board game than a card game imo

  • @SquatchtheMind
    @SquatchtheMind 5 місяців тому +1

    I find Magic fun but loathe it's design at this point. I've only ever kept my commander deck for the occasion game (which at this point is years in between).
    I'm also a sucker for old-school, well, anything fantasy. Will definitely pick this up.

  • @Keara113
    @Keara113 5 місяців тому

    What’s the thumbnail art?

  • @williambennett7935
    @williambennett7935 5 місяців тому +2

    I like love the creativity and inspiration that comes from real art. AI always looks bland and soulless compared to an oil painting.

  • @nickfanzo
    @nickfanzo 5 місяців тому

    Cool
    I’d rather look at the old mtg art from 1993-1995 than the new computer driven stuff on their cards. That’s why I only play old school mtg formats.

  • @Joker22593
    @Joker22593 5 місяців тому +1

    "Mythic" is the word you're looking for, not Legendary. Mythic is a rarity. Legendary is a Supertype.

  • @ixthizzar
    @ixthizzar 5 місяців тому +2

    Do you think there will be a market for trading and reselling like in magic? As in, you can theoretically get a card worth more than the box? (I know it's very early on, but I'm curious about your predictions for the game's future)

    • @ConfessionGang
      @ConfessionGang 5 місяців тому +3

      yes there are cards already in the hundreds and a few over 1k

    • @MrRayRockstar
      @MrRayRockstar 5 місяців тому +1

      ​@ConfessionGang that's ridiculous

    • @ConfessionGang
      @ConfessionGang 5 місяців тому +2

      @@MrRayRockstar not really people see things at prices people are willing to pay, and they don't reprint the way WOTC reprints, so cards can hold value. There no money in investing in a non reserve list mtg

    • @MrRayRockstar
      @MrRayRockstar 5 місяців тому

      @ConfessionGang so is this a game, or is this an investment?

    • @ConfessionGang
      @ConfessionGang 5 місяців тому +2

      @@MrRayRockstar A game that has collectibility, the value of your collection should g up over time. That keeps the game healthy for the long term. Why are you such a hater?? If you don't care about SCR then don't watch content about SCR. Why can't you just let people enjoy things?

  • @Ratstail91
    @Ratstail91 5 місяців тому +4

    seems neat, but I don't like the freeform nature of the text - it's a bit too "target player loses next turn" for me.

  • @joespizza11b42
    @joespizza11b42 5 місяців тому

    Team covenant has great content covering this game

  • @dungeondumbo
    @dungeondumbo 5 місяців тому

    👑

  • @bisnu548
    @bisnu548 4 місяці тому

    What's tcg

  • @schemage2210
    @schemage2210 5 місяців тому +3

    While I can't speak to the game itself, I find the stance of no digital art strange to say the least. What you make with a graphics tablet and photoshop (or krita or gimp or something else entirely) is up to the user. And I don't think I saw anything that would have been impossible to make digitally. You know, a graphics tablet is a tool, but so is a paint brush.

  • @FrapdoctorTV
    @FrapdoctorTV 5 місяців тому

    When I see a card with a paragraph on how it’s played on the card I am immediately turned off from the game.

  • @BlizzJaster
    @BlizzJaster 5 місяців тому

    If I could go back in time and get a cooler hobby than MtG, I would.

  • @kmkkorn420
    @kmkkorn420 5 місяців тому

    Seagrave is the GOAT

  • @GiganticPawUnit
    @GiganticPawUnit 5 місяців тому +1

    Honestly, this game sounds like it's not for people who play TCGs. The vagueness of the rules text is always gonna cause issues. I can't even count the number of times I and friends have been baffled trying to figure out text on a card in a board game, and that's always gonna be worse with a TCG card that you've never seen before. The varying limit on copies of a card per deck is going to make deckbuilding frustrating for anyone who has a strong sense of what they want their deck to do, because it reduces the consistency a lot. On top of that, I can't spot where the rarity indicator is on the card... If that's hard to spot at a glance, it'll make it way slower to make sure your deck follows the restrictions.

    • @QuestingBeast
      @QuestingBeast  5 місяців тому +2

      The rarity is actually in the typeline in the middle of a card. For example, an "elite" card has elite rarity (rare). You can make quite consistent decks if you want, you just have to mostly use commons and uncommons.

    • @ConfessionGang
      @ConfessionGang 5 місяців тому +2

      above the text body there is a line of text that always has the four rarity's in the text look for these words, ordinary= common, extraordinary =uncommon, elite= rare Unique=mythic

    • @MrRayRockstar
      @MrRayRockstar 5 місяців тому +2

      ​@QuestingBeast have you even heard of pauper?

  • @thekittenfreakify
    @thekittenfreakify 3 місяці тому

    Dislike how expensive it has gotten

  • @theotheralan5511
    @theotheralan5511 5 місяців тому

    When Mom says we have magic at home. 😅

  • @Garl_Vinland
    @Garl_Vinland 5 місяців тому +2

    The passive aggression towards MTG in this lol… sounds like this is basically Gwent

    • @MrRayRockstar
      @MrRayRockstar 5 місяців тому

      He called this game "eclectic" lol

  • @drillerdev4624
    @drillerdev4624 5 місяців тому +1

    The description of the game was a rollercoaster of ups and downs to me (not saying is a bad game, 100% personal taste).
    Ultimately, loose ruling and the TCG model makes it a pass for me, unfortunately. I hate blindbuys and gachas.

  • @StarkMaximum
    @StarkMaximum 4 місяці тому

    The game seems very interesting and has a very unique mechanic with the way you form and play across a battlefield. Some of the appeal points seem directly boomer-ish, a very "well back in MY day these games were BETTER" mindset, but if it inspires something creative and fun, I guess it's an alright outcome. I just wonder how sustainable it is to give every card hand-crafted art. Certainly worth keeping an eye on, but we'll see if it overcomes the Two-Year Curse and doesn't just die out, given that it's a niche within a niche.

  • @bootblacking
    @bootblacking 5 місяців тому +1

    It is _unacceptable_ that some card rules are purposefully left to interpretation. Never mix flavor and rules text.

  • @WarDogMadness
    @WarDogMadness 5 місяців тому

    Hey look a new cool card game. Cant wait tell a broke ass meta developed by sweat lords and ruins the game. But this does look very intresting.

    • @QuestingBeast
      @QuestingBeast  5 місяців тому +12

      It's designed around kitchen table play, not tournaments. And the deck construction rules make it very hard to make to make superpowered decks.

    • @drillerdev4624
      @drillerdev4624 5 місяців тому +2

      ​​@@QuestingBeastin the era of big data is impossible to avoid a meta landscape surging, I'm afraid.
      Keyforge allegedly tried to avoid it, and ended turning rarechase into arquetypechase, afaik

  • @BobMcDowell
    @BobMcDowell 5 місяців тому

    I find the concept that this art has yet to be digitized odd when you show me a foil card. "Banned" digital? No, not even close. "Demands originals are physical" sure, fine. But those are two very different things.

  • @bluefish5
    @bluefish5 5 місяців тому +2

    Hi. A professional artist here. You can't tell the difference between digital and traditional painting once it's been mass-printed. Especially on something as small as a not-magic card. What a pointlessly limiting restriction. I love traditional paint as much as the next person, but wow. Dumb.
    Beautiful cards though! :D

  • @MrRayRockstar
    @MrRayRockstar 5 місяців тому +2

    Why buy this when you can just buy vintage mtg. This game is just ANOTHER mtg ripoff that will fade away in time.

    • @ConfessionGang
      @ConfessionGang 5 місяців тому +2

      First no one plays the vintage mtg format Second SCR plays and feels nothing like mtg its a completely different game, and mtg didn't invent the fantasy genre. Why don't you just give up mtg and play a fun game???

    • @MrRayRockstar
      @MrRayRockstar 5 місяців тому

      @ConfessionGang mtg is the best and most fun game ever.
      They didn't invent the fantasy genre, but they did invent the ccg as we know it.
      And people do play vintage.

    • @ConfessionGang
      @ConfessionGang 5 місяців тому +3

      @@MrRayRockstar True they did invent it but mtg in recent isn't really a fixed fantasy anime more of Sci-fi with fantasy elements. MTG and SCR are very different games, SCR is closer to chess or a minitures game, (than it is to mtg) just happens to use cardboard. But judge the game on its own merits and give it a chance, it play nothing like mtg.

    • @MrRayRockstar
      @MrRayRockstar 5 місяців тому

      @ConfessionGang sorry, but mtg has so MANY formats that I would rather play with.

    • @ConfessionGang
      @ConfessionGang 5 місяців тому +3

      @@MrRayRockstar then go do that and let people enjoy the game they want to play.

  • @dwil0311
    @dwil0311 5 місяців тому +1

    “Banned digital art”?
    Yeah, that’s a company that I don’t want to support.

    • @autobotstarscream765
      @autobotstarscream765 5 місяців тому

      They can't tell the difference between something you draw on a tablet and something an AI pieced together.

  • @horabfibslager8762
    @horabfibslager8762 4 місяці тому +1

    Yeah, this game looks pretty lame to play not gonna lie.

  • @FlashRave
    @FlashRave 5 місяців тому +1

    i like the idea but the layout makes them look like cheap board game cards.

    • @MrRayRockstar
      @MrRayRockstar 5 місяців тому

      Cheap and at the same time expensive

  • @lexedmonds9075
    @lexedmonds9075 5 місяців тому +2

    Nice, but the cost is way too high for something with so few cards to draw from. I'm also unimpressed with the art direction. Sure none of it is digital, but digital or not, the majority of it just looks uninspired.

    • @feral_orc
      @feral_orc 5 місяців тому +9

      hello wotc employee

    • @CrabSpu
      @CrabSpu 5 місяців тому +2

      Nah fam op is right it looks literally ok.

    • @nibernator
      @nibernator 5 місяців тому +2

      Art is amazing lmao
      Of course there are less cards, it is the beta… lmao

    • @MrRayRockstar
      @MrRayRockstar 5 місяців тому +1

      This game is already super expensive without proving itself it's going to last.

  • @greenfeller
    @greenfeller 5 місяців тому +2

    That certainly _looks_ like how I remember Magic: The Gathering felt, circa 1994. Thank you for sharing this.