Some comments talking trash of this helicopter when they don’t realize it was more of an infrastructure and training problem and not the helicopter itself. It performs on par to the Apache and using Ukraine as a reference point of these helicopter’s effectiveness is not a fair comparison given that this is essentially the first real world application to modern warfare between fairly modern nations. People seem to forget that that air superiority is established with jets and bombers well before US forces deploy them hence why Russia had a hard time dealing with ground based anti-air. They failed to establish air superiority hence why KA-52 are getting shot down more often. My team have recovered wrecked apaches littered the throughout the Middle East in a span of 25 years, and to say AH-64D/E are better than these in practice is a misleading comparison.
Thanks for the educational grace you have bestowed upon us. Let's keep learning together. And we have never mentioned Ukraine or Russia in this content. The goal is to learn.
Well..all this information on this video, and your comments sounds good and all about the Alligator helicopter, makes it sound like a real good attack helicopter. But I don’t think Russian military technology is on par with the U.S. and the war in Ukraine just proves it. This Alligator is really crocodile if you ask me. They just can’t seem to avoid getting shot down. And the avionics is crap, the pilots have to use the GPS on their phones to fly to their targets, because the on board radar is so unreliable. Plus they don’t have the same level of support system like the Apache does. Nice informative video tho. And good to know Rob Ster.
Give Apache helicopter to poorly train Russian pilot and you get the same results. The machine is not at fault, it's the humans and this is why Skynet will win
@@Aitelly one mistake made, Ka52 is not one of few helicopters who have ejection seat it's the only one. Only Ka52 2seater and Ka50 1 seater have ejection seat.
As pro-Ukrainian I think this is the best helicopter in terms of survivability. It has one weaker point compared to Western helicopters. However, I think Western avionics are supreme. Can see opponents sooner and missiles are pinpoint accurate. But a single manpad can take a apache down. Only defense is what it is equipped with, anti-air stuff. Good enough to occasionally destroy incoming missiles. But not strong enough to dominate enemy territory.
@@jeffp2935rong. Russian ka-52s fires also from a distance and we seen how badass this helicopter did in the ukrianian your generals incompetent strategy of counteroffensive that ended in a biggest failure of modern military century. All you are saying is western helicopters have better electronics. Slightly yes but rest in maneuvers, maintenance, firepower, reconnaissance, survivability ka-52 is sure surpasses apache and it's best helicopter in the world
Agreed. The aircraft has proven itself in a real war against competent opponents and weapons ( as opposed to the Apache shooting at mountain dwellers with AK 47s )
@@862F4 so? All ka-52 pilots got saved. Plus they can still fly being hit. Also they updated ka-52s so it's even more difficult to shoot down. Why you barely hear any being shot down?
Конечно хорошо, что там есть катапульта. Однако на тех высотах, на которых сегодня реально приходится работать вертолётам, времени на то, чтобы отстрелить лопасти, потом отстрелить фонарь кабины и потом выпулиться оттуда на кресле уже не будет. Ка-52 - это вертолёт в концепции "летающий танк". По сути это правнук Ил-2 - который тоже был заточен на "хождение по головам", всегда летел в самое адище боя, всегда навстречу лавине огня с земли - был отлично бронирован, неимоверно живуч...и, на этом всё. Если бы на Ка-52 была другая авионика и другие системы вооружения, позволявшие бы применять его с относительно больших (для вертолёта) высот, при этом не входя в зону прямого огневого воздействия с земли, тогда катапультные кресла на нём были бы более актуальны. Но, конечно же, хорошо, что они вообще есть - возможно когда-то это кому-то спасёт жизнь.
In modern warfare, helicopters are consumables, regardless of the country. The reason is the dominance of systems for hitting air targets over their protection system. In terms of avionics, the Ka-52 is the best combat helicopter in the world.
There is an optional active defence system for ka52 that can be installed as an external module. I know a few episodes when a single ka52 has been attacked with multiple manpads and most of missiles have been neutralised by this module. I guess it blinds it or something.
We are now finally seeing the best these KA-52's have to offer during Ukraine's offensive, they have been stalking whole NATO equipped columns undetected and without taking losses in months. There was even a video going around of a KA-52 STILL flying fine after its whole tail section was ripped off, truly showcasing the benefits of the coaxial blades
2022: Western tanks are a game changer. They are designed to resist Soviet weapons. 2023: Anyone else remember what an unexploded Leopard and Bradley look like?
The tail fell off exactly as the KA-52 dropped the external fuel tanks. Extreme vibration and poor maintenance. High Resolution video from Pilot following in formation
In June 2023 one of Ka-52 "Alligator" was hit by Ukrainian MANPAD and the tail stabilizer was destroyed completely. Nevertheless the crew managed to bring it back home safely. Apache AH-64 with this kind of damage would have go down immediately.
10 years ago, there were heated debates on the Internet between supporters of the Mi-28 and Ka-52 platforms. Supporters of the Mi-28 responded to this argument that the coaxial scheme has a danger of overlapping screws during intensive maneuvering.
@@ЭвМ-ЭффектвМассы как всегда реальный бой показал, что соосная система превосходит Ми28, хотя дорогая в производстве. Ми-28 дешевле, зато Ка-52 намного эффективнее уничтожает укро-нацистов
@@Tragicide они все живы и вернулись, просто машину подальше от линии соприкосновения отводили! Вы знали, что Ка-52 может лететь, не летать, на повреждённых лопостях до 70 %. Вот они и не катапультировались.
Hi, I think you missed, that KA-52 are using also new "Izdelje-305" missiles (or LMUR or 9A7755). These guided missiles have increase range up to 15-25km and its warhead is around 25kg. They are already in service.
"Izdelie 305" is just a piece of shit, sorry for my English. That missile can fly in 14,5 km (in official data) and have 25 kg high-explosive warhead. It's too low for high-explosive fragmentation: a tank's armor can't be penetrated, a pillbox can't be destroyed. Moreover that missile flies very slooowly: up to 230 m/s.
@@test1ngthew4ters You're up with the Nazi, then? Well, it's nice to have xenophobia finally allowed in some countries previously countered among 'civilized'. Shows people's true nature better.
Perfectly modeled. According to official data. The latest upgrade (Ka-52M) has a new radar with a fixed AFAR on 640 receiving and transmitting modules that detects a bridge-type target at a range of up to 100 kilometers, a destroyer-class ship - 150 kilometers, and air targets - at a range of up to 50 kilometers. At the same time, the new radar weighs 10 kg less than the "Crossbow" - 120 kg instead of 130. The new radar also has the ability to detect helicopters in hover mode at a range of up to 20 kilometers. Also, the authors did not mention LMUR, the footage of the first use of which in a combat situation was made public last year. An interesting fact is that when working on infantry, the Ka-52 is often used as a flying MLRS (the helicopter lifts its nose up and releases unguided missiles along a ballistic trajectory).
It's the best 3D animation on a coaxial rotor helicopter I've seen. Hope to see more videos about coaxial rotorcrafts such as Sikorsky Defiant X, Radier X, and so on.
@@Krelipstero ага с начала лета более 20 населенных пунктов ВСУ отвоевала, дроны в Москве летают. Ты просто не те телеграм каналы смотришь. Кстати на днях еще один корабль был потоплен.
@@Krelipstero о каких результатах речь ? Тебе никто не расскажет о потерях. Я на результат и смотрю, десятки населенных пунктов освобождены. Россия только отступает. Германия начнет поставки новых крылатых ракет.
It's also worth noting that tandem bladed helicopters are somewhat quieter because the two rotors end up canceling out some of the noise generated by the other. So by the time you do hear the vehicle it's going to be quite a bit closer than you'd expect it to be.
@@brianb-p6586 Hundreds if not thousands of folk have read Yukimaru0 comment and new what they where trying to say. But you dear fellow win the prize for actually stating the obvious.
@@comradericefarmerhao2269 thats the case with litterly every helicopter tho. I actually heard volunteers fighting for ukraine complain about the ka52 saying thatt it takes a full team of guys with stingers to take one out
8:34 хорошо видна структура остекления дверей кабины, и зигзагообоазная линия. Но автор видео скорее всего не понял зачем она там, и просто нарисовал её как часть остекления кабины. На самом деле это специальный пирошнур для разрушения остекления при катапультировании, и этот элемент катапультирования не был показан на моделировании. А он довольно важен.
@@alexmoos6858 в марте этого года в зоне сво, в первые в истории было совершенно успешное катапультирование с подбитого вертолёта, экипаж выжил, этим вертолётом был Ка 52.
@@alexmoos6858 Потому, что катапультирование это очень опасная для здоровья штука, и его используют прям в самом крайнем случае. А Ка52 настолько уверенная машина, что практически всегда при ее подбитии она в состоянии сама совершить экстренную посадку, без катапультирования.
@@pawelnovikov5026 это да, штука крутая. Мне не очень понятно почему на других вертолетах ее нет. Отстрелить лопасти есть возможность при любых схемах, даже на Чинуке
el apache solo se a provado contra granjeros y talibanes e insurgentes , el ka 52 tiene un historial de combate real contra un rival de primera como el ejercito ucraniano
Apache should be compared to Mi-28N, I suppose they are very similar. Kamov's device is... rather unique, I would say. And, good job with all this 3d-modelling. It looks superb!
Correct. AH-64 is not comparable with this machine. Ka-52 is much more advanced, both by engine-trust technology and avionics. Mi-28 is the true competator of AH-64. The Kamov is just another in another league.
Vasily Gryazev designed this gun. Arkady Shipunov specialized in missile weapons. However, they were a creative duo, thanks to them we have such guns as GSh-2-23, GSh-2-30, GSh-6-30, AO-18, 2A42 gun (its modification is installed on the Ka-52) and so Further.
It is worth adding to all the above weapons another guided missile "Izdelie 305" or "Product 305". This new guided missile has a range of 14.5 km and a warhead weighing 25 kg. You've probably seen a video of a Russian missile flying through a window. This is the rocket. There is no point in comparing the KA-52 with the AH-64. There is no reliable data on on-board electronics, optics and radar. In fact, these are just platforms for launching ATGMs. Russian ATGMs fly faster and farther. The American ones, I believe, have better guidance. But the KA-52 has more systems that allowed the pilot and the weapons operator to survive.
In june 2023 on Ukraine Counter Offensive, KA 52 hit 4 ukraine combat vehicle recorded on 1 fly mission, Leopard Tank and Bradley IFV blow up from 5km range, this choper is a killer badas by an expert pilot.. 🔥🔥
To all the sofa military experts, what do you think about "piece of rusty junk" Ka-52 and "poorly trained Russian pilots" NOW after Ukraine's counter-offensive that turned to be a complete and absolute DISASTER? The Russian attack helicopters piloted by Ivan in Ushankas destroyed several hundred of Western tanks and armoured vehicles, including the Leopards.
"Several hundred western tanks" - blabla! There are not even such amounts operating in Ukraine right now. You tell the same nonsense as the Soviet propaganda leaflets during the 1943 Battle of Kursk that told Germans to give up because "hundreds of Tiger and Panther tanks have already been destroyed" with the number of tanks stated being higher than the total amount of them having been built at the time.
@@einundsiebenziger5488 Really? There were 50+ Tigers and about 250+ Panthers at Kursk! Not to mention Sturmpanzer and Ferdinand, Elefant etc. My Stepfather was at Kursk driving a SDKfz. Panzergrenadier. He saw the rows of Panthers... Also 5 Bradleys destroyed in a picture from the front and Ukrainazis say they only lost 2 of them - Tells you where the lies are made. MISTER SOFA EXPERT!
Да,мы русские такие,вечно пьяные,ездим на медведях ,с топором в руках,ни чего не стоит нас победить,и монголы,и французы ,и немцы,нас всегда побеждали,а теперь ещё и НАТО нас хочет победить,вот только где мы их всех хоронить будем.
Thank You for accurate representation of our helicopter! We was manage to save plants and working crew through complicated time to our country in mid-nineties. Some silly people dared to talk just after tragic crash of USSR that we not more needed advanced weapons, that design and produce such great machines just waste of resources! Truth was so different, obviously...
The lack of the tail rotor makes the helicopter quite a bit shorter, very handy for landing them on ships. Less storage room and a smaller landing zone.
@@3aTMeHuePa3yMa Мой знакомый военный реабилитолог. Во время катапультирования идет огромное воздействие на позвоночник. Выбитые позвонки это самое малое что может случится, очень часто позвоночник просто ломает. После катапультирования очень немногие могут вернутся в строй. Это уже от организма зависит как быстро он восстановится или не восстановится совсем.
one of these helicopter got hit in the tail by manpad. if it wasn't for it's coaxial rotors it would already be already shutdown. But still manage to fly back to base for repairs.
People call ka52 trash because it's Russian made. But fail to realize that ka52 is facing a country with air defense unlike what the US fought in the middle east "farmers in sandals and ak" buts still a lot of apaches been shot down wen their enemy doesn't have anti air
Thanks a lot for uploading this, I bought a KA-52 from a sketch albanian guy the other day to help me go to town because I live in the mountains but I have no idea how it works. Now that I saw its capability, I can't wait to try out this dangerous maneuver later when I go to the nearest town to buy provisions.
Almost normal review but many mistakes in parameters... 9K121 Vikhr-1 range is 10 km (supersonic, 28 second to max range), S-8OFP1 range is 6 km, and at the 5th and 6th hardpoints are 9S846 "Strelets" (Archer) with modified missile based on 9K338 Igla-S (not the same, with different flight profile and characteristics). And many other types of ammunition aren't been mentioned at all...
The most sexy, the most deadly, the most impressive combat helicopter on Earth today. Not only that, but it's the only helicopter in the world pilots can eject from and they have. Russian pilots have ejected from these in combat and survived. Russian engineering is beautiful stuff 🤌
@@alexanderk7776 well when you send a low flying (compared to jet fighters) slow, aircraft into a modern battlefield where it isn't just people in AK-47s in turbines. Where there's an actual professional army that it has been equipped with thousands of MANPADS, you will lose some helicopters although unlike in the Apache and other Far West NATO produced junk, people in the ka-52 have a 99% chance of surviving the initial attack on the aircraft after they eject from it and land safely on the ground
@@alexanderk7776 I'm on telegram and I've never seen this video and if it does exist, it exists because the pilots made an emergency landing because they were able to salvage the helicopter and there was no point to eject. Turn your brain on westerner, I know it's next to impossible but try.
1) Для диванных экспертов. Катапультирование опасно для жизни пилота, и никто не будет его использовать, если есть другой вариант. 2) Почему никто не отметил его живучесть в бою? Бой в Гостомеле показал на сколько он долго может держаться в воздухе и вести бой. Ка-52 выдержал 2-3 попадания из ПЗРК(Stinger), сотню пуль, которые попадали в двигатель, и после этого он приземлился спокойно, экипаж высадился и был эвакуирован. Полное видео спокойно можно найти в интернете.
I wanted to see the mechanics of the contra rotating shafts, but oh well it was still interesting. These craft can fly sideways and backwards, and are more maneuverable than regular choppers.
Seeing these in action is revealing, they are also tough when hit, the pilots rarely eject and usually a second one rescues them ASAP. As for their destructive capability.. The videos almost look fake, they go in under fire using their flares and chaff, one video showed it hitting 23 targets while evading ground fire. The Russians don't waste these babies, they put them to work 👍
If u notice that there are kamovs being taken down it's because they are in the frontline against an enemy who has modern anti-aircraft systems and obviously it's way different than fighting against Muslims with just AK's, when the Apaches get into a real war there will be many deceases. The Russians pilots are well trained and the kamov is a good machine, if there are some of these destroyed that's because the enemy has guns to fire back unlike the poor countries in the middle east.
Oh of course there are losses but I mean if you go to oryx you will see like 43 maybe. But if you closely inspect each and everyone you will see like only quarter the number is verified. Same goes for ukranian losses. Inspect each image and you will see the real losses are like 50%.
Viktr missiles have more than 8km range, theres footage of a KA-52 in Donbass engaging and destroying Max Pros Mraps and M2A2 bradleys from ranges of over 17km ( this was calculated by taking the speed of the missile into consideration and how long it took to reach these targets) . The 2A42 30mm cannon although mounted in a limiting position is also on the Mi-28s but they're almost fully traversable yet both are totally useless. This isnt like in the Iraq war or Afghan where the air space is uncontested and surface to air threats are all neutralized nor as sophisticated as what the Ukrainians are fielding. You simply cant maintain altitude and utilize thermals and the autocannon to take out soft threats from far like in previous conflicts . The viktr missiles are multipurpose and can be use to target soft targets from further and at a lower altitude where as the Shipunov's 30mm would be heard from miles away. One thing you should have mention is the advanced targetting system and CCIP of the KA-52s that basically make it possible for the pilots to target enemies extremely accurately with cheap non smart munitions such as the S-8 and S-13 rockets where as the NATO/western countries use munitions that have guidance built into the weapon itself. This basically means the pilot of the ka-52 can use cheaper, more readily available munitions just as effectively as the more expensive munitions being used on stuff like the AH-64D which cost way more.
I have always admired Kamov and his designs, I had always considered her among the best in creativity, unfortunately as often happens in the defense industry, whoever has the most political power wins the contracts and Kamov has less political power compared to MIL , for those who don't know the Chinese Z-10 helicopter was designed by Kamov for the Chinese government
I love this channel. Animations are so well done, and I get to learn fun facts. Also, the discussions and debates in the comments are very interesting, since often the commenters are from different countries that oppose each other. Much love from the US.
Some comments talking trash of this helicopter when they don’t realize it was more of an infrastructure and training problem and not the helicopter itself.
It performs on par to the Apache and using Ukraine as a reference point of these helicopter’s effectiveness is not a fair comparison given that this is essentially the first real world application to modern warfare between fairly modern nations.
People seem to forget that that air superiority is established with jets and bombers well before US forces deploy them hence why Russia had a hard time dealing with ground based anti-air. They failed to establish air superiority hence why KA-52 are getting shot down more often.
My team have recovered wrecked apaches littered the throughout the Middle East in a span of 25 years, and to say AH-64D/E are better than these in practice is a misleading comparison.
Thanks for the educational grace you have bestowed upon us.
Let's keep learning together.
And we have never mentioned Ukraine or Russia in this content.
The goal is to learn.
Well..all this information on this video, and your comments sounds good and all about the Alligator helicopter, makes it sound like a real good attack helicopter. But I don’t think Russian military technology is on par with the U.S. and the war in Ukraine just proves it. This Alligator is really crocodile if you ask me. They just can’t seem to avoid getting shot down. And the avionics is crap, the pilots have to use the GPS on their phones to fly to their targets, because the on board radar is so unreliable. Plus they don’t have the same level of support system like the Apache does. Nice informative video tho. And good to know Rob Ster.
Doubt you've recovered wrecks of Apaches lmao
@@Loubie2005 yes, they fail like any Mechanical machine
Give Apache helicopter to poorly train Russian pilot and you get the same results. The machine is not at fault, it's the humans and this is why Skynet will win
That is one of the most detailed moving 3d model of the Ka-52 I have seen yet. Bravo!
Thank You
@@Aitelly one mistake made, Ka52 is not one of few helicopters who have ejection seat it's the only one. Only Ka52 2seater and Ka50 1 seater have ejection seat.
@@arsenijearsen3041 Thats wrong the Mi-28 has an ejection seat system as well
@@GorbZZ Nope. Only Ka-50 (K-37) and Ka-52 (K-37-800M) have ejection seats.
Honestly I would pay a fair amount to have it.
This is the best helicopter in the world so far.
As pro-Ukrainian I think this is the best helicopter in terms of survivability. It has one weaker point compared to Western helicopters. However, I think Western avionics are supreme. Can see opponents sooner and missiles are pinpoint accurate. But a single manpad can take a apache down. Only defense is what it is equipped with, anti-air stuff.
Good enough to occasionally destroy incoming missiles. But not strong enough to dominate enemy territory.
@@jeffp2935rong. Russian ka-52s fires also from a distance and we seen how badass this helicopter did in the ukrianian your generals incompetent strategy of counteroffensive that ended in a biggest failure of modern military century. All you are saying is western helicopters have better electronics. Slightly yes but rest in maneuvers, maintenance, firepower, reconnaissance, survivability ka-52 is sure surpasses apache and it's best helicopter in the world
Agreed. The aircraft has proven itself in a real war against competent opponents and weapons ( as opposed to the Apache shooting at mountain dwellers with AK 47s )
@@alexnderrrthewoke4479 no wonder a lot of them got shot down.
@@862F4 so? All ka-52 pilots got saved. Plus they can still fly being hit. Also they updated ka-52s so it's even more difficult to shoot down. Why you barely hear any being shot down?
the Ka also has first ever heli pilot eject seats, with blow panels on the rotors and glass, which is pretty cool.
"cool" is not the right word. I would say - "vital". pilots have a chance to escape, unlike 100% of those sentenced in Apache
@@OLEG-gt2yt 7
Ka-50
Конечно хорошо, что там есть катапульта. Однако на тех высотах, на которых сегодня реально приходится работать вертолётам, времени на то, чтобы отстрелить лопасти, потом отстрелить фонарь кабины и потом выпулиться оттуда на кресле уже не будет.
Ка-52 - это вертолёт в концепции "летающий танк". По сути это правнук Ил-2 - который тоже был заточен на "хождение по головам", всегда летел в самое адище боя, всегда навстречу лавине огня с земли - был отлично бронирован, неимоверно живуч...и, на этом всё.
Если бы на Ка-52 была другая авионика и другие системы вооружения, позволявшие бы применять его с относительно больших (для вертолёта) высот, при этом не входя в зону прямого огневого воздействия с земли, тогда катапультные кресла на нём были бы более актуальны. Но, конечно же, хорошо, что они вообще есть - возможно когда-то это кому-то спасёт жизнь.
In modern warfare, helicopters are consumables, regardless of the country. The reason is the dominance of systems for hitting air targets over their protection system. In terms of avionics, the Ka-52 is the best combat helicopter in the world.
There is an optional active defence system for ka52 that can be installed as an external module. I know a few episodes when a single ka52 has been attacked with multiple manpads and most of missiles have been neutralised by this module. I guess it blinds it or something.
We call it just “the best attack helicopter in the world”😊
We are now finally seeing the best these KA-52's have to offer during Ukraine's offensive, they have been stalking whole NATO equipped columns undetected and without taking losses in months. There was even a video going around of a KA-52 STILL flying fine after its whole tail section was ripped off, truly showcasing the benefits of the coaxial blades
2022: Western tanks are a game changer. They are designed to resist Soviet weapons.
2023: Anyone else remember what an unexploded Leopard and Bradley look like?
I thought Russians have no weapons and only have scrap metals
The tail fell off exactly as the KA-52 dropped the external fuel tanks. Extreme vibration and poor maintenance. High Resolution video from Pilot following in formation
@@alexchristensen9712 no, read carefully what the author of the original video wrote
@@alexchristensen9712the tail was shot off by an anti aircraft missile. Informs your self before looking like an idiot.
In June 2023 one of Ka-52 "Alligator" was hit by Ukrainian MANPAD and the tail stabilizer was destroyed completely. Nevertheless the crew managed to bring it back home safely. Apache AH-64 with this kind of damage would have go down immediately.
Exactly!! I saw the footage!!! If that was the apache, it would have been destroyed from such a hit!
10 years ago, there were heated debates on the Internet between supporters of the Mi-28 and Ka-52 platforms. Supporters of the Mi-28 responded to this argument that the coaxial scheme has a danger of overlapping screws during intensive maneuvering.
@@ЭвМ-ЭффектвМассы как всегда реальный бой показал, что соосная система превосходит Ми28, хотя дорогая в производстве. Ми-28 дешевле, зато Ка-52 намного эффективнее уничтожает укро-нацистов
@@ЭвМ-ЭффектвМассы with engineering experience this problem becomes less and less significant.
Yet they have almost lost half of their KA-52 fleet in Ukraine, seems like russian statistics are way overhyped!😉
I did see this helicopter in combat but never knew it was this much capable and advanced. And it has a pilot ejection system. Wow!
look how many of them were shot down in Ukraine .. overrated or crooked rashists
I bet their pilots didn’t know that either.
@@Tragicide I bet you are an idiot!
@@Tragicide они все живы и вернулись, просто машину подальше от линии соприкосновения отводили! Вы знали, что Ка-52 может лететь, не летать, на повреждённых лопостях до 70 %. Вот они и не катапультировались.
Yes, the pilots pulled the ejection handle and found out that it was just a scam when hit by a Ukranian missile.
Hi, I think you missed, that KA-52 are using also new "Izdelje-305" missiles (or LMUR or 9A7755). These guided missiles have increase range up to 15-25km and its warhead is around 25kg. They are already in service.
my brother used 305 missle in ukraine last year! It was awesome he said.
@@fredbrogman is he a Russian pilot?
"Izdelie 305" is just a piece of shit, sorry for my English. That missile can fly in 14,5 km (in official data) and have 25 kg high-explosive warhead. It's too low for high-explosive fragmentation: a tank's armor can't be penetrated, a pillbox can't be destroyed. Moreover that missile flies very slooowly: up to 230 m/s.
@@fredbrogman And if they had used Stinger, would he have said that it was "awesome", too?
@@test1ngthew4ters You're up with the Nazi, then? Well, it's nice to have xenophobia finally allowed in some countries previously countered among 'civilized'. Shows people's true nature better.
Perfectly modeled.
According to official data. The latest upgrade (Ka-52M) has a new radar with a fixed AFAR on 640 receiving and transmitting modules that detects a bridge-type target at a range of up to 100 kilometers, a destroyer-class ship - 150 kilometers, and air targets - at a range of up to 50 kilometers. At the same time, the new radar weighs 10 kg less than the "Crossbow" - 120 kg instead of 130. The new radar also has the ability to detect helicopters in hover mode at a range of up to 20 kilometers.
Also, the authors did not mention LMUR, the footage of the first use of which in a combat situation was made public last year.
An interesting fact is that when working on infantry, the Ka-52 is often used as a flying MLRS (the helicopter lifts its nose up and releases unguided missiles along a ballistic trajectory).
They also have new anti-tank missiles with a 12-15km range.
Such a beautiful machine and animation, thank you!
Glad you like it!
This is the best helicopter in the game right now... Western tanks know what I'm talking about 🎉😊
На текущий момент ка52 самый результативный вертолет в мире. Украина отличный полигон )
Овсянкин Николай Михайлович, профи в вывозе мусора в Сургуте, восхищается летающим мусором, иронично )
@@Nil_admirari обезьяна, ты оказывается гуглом можешь пользоваться, удивил ))) пол ляма обезьян зажарено а эти все на ютюбах воюют )))
@@CJIABuK77 Николай, почему не в окопах, воин?
@@Nil_admirari мне достаточно удаленно жарить обезьян
Scrap America yes😂@@Nil_admirari
German Leopards flee chaotically when a KA-52 shows up 🤣
In the animation, the Ka-52 attacks Bradley. And now it has become a reality.
It's the best 3D animation on a coaxial rotor helicopter I've seen. Hope to see more videos about coaxial rotorcrafts such as Sikorsky Defiant X, Radier X, and so on.
Yes we love the defiant X but very few details are available. But will look into it.
This is a great helicopter design
Yes we agree.
Lol. That POS is falling off the sky as water during a rainy day, in Ukraine.
In 2023, this Russian helicopter has become a nightmare for Ukrainian tanks
and nato tanks and nato IFVs and APCs
конашенков что ле рассказал ?
@@Krelipstero ага с начала лета более 20 населенных пунктов ВСУ отвоевала, дроны в Москве летают. Ты просто не те телеграм каналы смотришь. Кстати на днях еще один корабль был потоплен.
@@Krelipstero о каких результатах речь ? Тебе никто не расскажет о потерях. Я на результат и смотрю, десятки населенных пунктов освобождены. Россия только отступает. Германия начнет поставки новых крылатых ракет.
@@Krelipstero иди в окоп диванный
The 2a42 shipunov is also lethal against infantry and manpower as each round produces over 340 fragments and have a 5m kill radius.
У этой пушки отдача 5 тонн, конструктор специально её закрепил в середине - поближе к центру масс, иначе вертолёт сносило бы отдачей.
Seen them up close at MAKS. Impressive looking machines, on the ground and in the air!
leopards, Bradleys, abrams, challengers and many others will remember this helicopter forever
Amazing. This is the most detailed and informative video with 3D Model KA-52 I've ever seen.
Thanks 🙏👍🙏
It's also worth noting that tandem bladed helicopters are somewhat quieter because the two rotors end up canceling out some of the noise generated by the other. So by the time you do hear the vehicle it's going to be quite a bit closer than you'd expect it to be.
This is not tandem; it's coaxial. An example of a tandem design is the CH-47 Chinook.
@@brianb-p6586 Hundreds if not thousands of folk have read Yukimaru0 comment and new what they where trying to say. But you dear fellow win the prize for actually stating the obvious.
@@TheClanAdventures it's not obvious to the person who made the video; if it were, the correct term would have been used.
@@brianb-p6586 your still doing it.
@@TheClanAdventures Theres nothing wrong with the correction. People who want to learn (like me) appreciate it. I didn't know the difference until now
This Alligator just massacre herd of leopard 😎
Let’s be real tho. It’s only GREAT at what it does when there is no proper air defense on the enemy side
@@comradericefarmerhao2269ahh right, and apache & abrams only great when fight middle east opium farmers..
@@truthseeker3219 exactly
@@comradericefarmerhao2269 thats the case with litterly every helicopter tho. I actually heard volunteers fighting for ukraine complain about the ka52 saying thatt it takes a full team of guys with stingers to take one out
@@nekko5778 well ofc Russia mid war used ka-52 as artillery. Russians would fly them then angle them to the air to fire their unguided missiles.
Bradley and leopards burnt by the shot of such a beautiful helicopter go to heaven
8:34 хорошо видна структура остекления дверей кабины, и зигзагообоазная линия. Но автор видео скорее всего не понял зачем она там, и просто нарисовал её как часть остекления кабины. На самом деле это специальный пирошнур для разрушения остекления при катапультировании, и этот элемент катапультирования не был показан на моделировании. А он довольно важен.
Один хрен, этой катапультой не пользуются 😁
@@alexmoos6858 в марте этого года в зоне сво, в первые в истории было совершенно успешное катапультирование с подбитого вертолёта, экипаж выжил, этим вертолётом был Ка 52.
@@alexmoos6858 Потому, что катапультирование это очень опасная для здоровья штука, и его используют прям в самом крайнем случае.
А Ка52 настолько уверенная машина, что практически всегда при ее подбитии она в состоянии сама совершить экстренную посадку, без катапультирования.
@@Maks_Morkovkin само наличие такой системы даёт +100500 к уверенности .
@@pawelnovikov5026 это да, штука крутая. Мне не очень понятно почему на других вертолетах ее нет. Отстрелить лопасти есть возможность при любых схемах, даже на Чинуке
It is incorrect to compare this to apache. Mi-28 is analog of apache, Ka-52 is completely different class machine.
el apache solo se a provado contra granjeros y talibanes e insurgentes , el ka 52 tiene un historial de combate real contra un rival de primera como el ejercito ucraniano
@@alonsomorales4284 *laughs in Gulf War*
We don't have an Apache analog. Mi-28 closer in characteristics, because of the overhead radar.
@@paulsteaven At gulf war 20 AH-64 Apache was shoot down and 50 Apache was shoot dawn in only Iran war
@@sun_intouch what? I can't understand you. Iran only has older AH-1 Cobras not Apaches.
Эта война безусловно укрепит Россию и сделает ее первой по мощности, опыту и высоким технологиям, армией в мире! Это лучшая тренировка!!!
How it works? It works fine! Ask Leopards.
how can we ask them they all dead
@@yourass7934 Hows the war going, cunt?
Apache should be compared to Mi-28N, I suppose they are very similar. Kamov's device is... rather unique, I would say. And, good job with all this 3d-modelling. It looks superb!
Correct. AH-64 is not comparable with this machine. Ka-52 is much more advanced, both by engine-trust technology and avionics. Mi-28 is the true competator of AH-64. The Kamov is just another in another league.
This aircraft is very very good at what it was design for!
Which is? Falling off from the sky? 😂
This is the best attack helicopter in the world.
I love this one, it's my favorite in Battlefield 2042 game ♥️ Super design and controllability
Vasily Gryazev designed this gun. Arkady Shipunov specialized in missile weapons. However, they were a creative duo, thanks to them we have such guns as GSh-2-23, GSh-2-30, GSh-6-30, AO-18, 2A42 gun (its modification is installed on the Ka-52) and so Further.
ты главное не забудь Грязев и Шипунов создали так же и пистолет ГШ-18 с применением технологии авиационной пушки.
Аркадий Шипунов родился в городе Ливны Орловской области ,также это родина Поликарпова Н. Н ,советского авиаконструктора . Горжусь своими земляками .
Очень впечатляющая анимация! Работа проделана титаническая! 👍👍
Its a great war beast. Sturdy & discreet machine ever built with rotor balancing.
It is worth adding to all the above weapons another guided missile "Izdelie 305" or "Product 305". This new guided missile has a range of 14.5 km and a warhead weighing 25 kg. You've probably seen a video of a Russian missile flying through a window. This is the rocket.
There is no point in comparing the KA-52 with the AH-64. There is no reliable data on on-board electronics, optics and radar. In fact, these are just platforms for launching ATGMs. Russian ATGMs fly faster and farther. The American ones, I believe, have better guidance. But the KA-52 has more systems that allowed the pilot and the weapons operator to survive.
Amazing info on this beast. One of the best i have seen re any military aircraft. Great Job!
In june 2023 on Ukraine Counter Offensive, KA 52 hit 4 ukraine combat vehicle recorded on 1 fly mission, Leopard Tank and Bradley IFV blow up from 5km range, this choper is a killer badas by an expert pilot.. 🔥🔥
Without a doubt my favourite helicopter by far. The Soviets wanted a helicopter that ejects its pilots safety... They delivered.
Pardon my choice of words
I just found a new helicopter that hits me in the G-spot.
My new favorite helicopter
Pardon my choice of words
I just found a new helicopter that hits me in the G-spot.
My new favorite helicopter
Great explanation. Amazing 3D. Fun to watch. Simple and straightforward narration. Good job. I like it.
Thank you very much! Truly Humble
Какй же он красивый 😍
This helo is one hell of airborne tanker 😮😮😮
Thanks!
Always welcome 😁
To all the sofa military experts, what do you think about "piece of rusty junk" Ka-52 and "poorly trained Russian pilots" NOW after Ukraine's counter-offensive that turned to be a complete and absolute DISASTER? The Russian attack helicopters piloted by Ivan in Ushankas destroyed several hundred of Western tanks and armoured vehicles, including the Leopards.
"Several hundred western tanks" - blabla! There are not even such amounts operating in Ukraine right now. You tell the same nonsense as the Soviet propaganda leaflets during the 1943 Battle of Kursk that told Germans to give up because "hundreds of Tiger and Panther tanks have already been destroyed" with the number of tanks stated being higher than the total amount of them having been built at the time.
but the counteroffensive is really stopped and Western equipment really suffered in large quantities😅
@@einundsiebenziger5488 Really? There were 50+ Tigers and about 250+ Panthers at Kursk! Not to mention Sturmpanzer and Ferdinand, Elefant etc. My Stepfather was at Kursk driving a SDKfz. Panzergrenadier. He saw the rows of Panthers... Also 5 Bradleys destroyed in a picture from the front and Ukrainazis say they only lost 2 of them - Tells you where the lies are made. MISTER SOFA EXPERT!
Да,мы русские такие,вечно пьяные,ездим на медведях ,с топором в руках,ни чего не стоит нас победить,и монголы,и французы ,и немцы,нас всегда побеждали,а теперь ещё и НАТО нас хочет победить,вот только где мы их всех хоронить будем.
@@einundsiebenziger5488 а как же несколько десятков бмп брендли? А как же 80 леопардови
the number one Helicopter in the world by far
Watching it kick Leopards and Bradleys 10Km away is nuts. The computer and systems of it is just crazy.
Kamov helis are state of art
*And from the looks of things The KA-52 has performed exactly as it's designers planned*
This heli is the killer of Leopard 2A6 and Bradley
Thank You for accurate representation of our helicopter! We was manage to save plants and working crew through complicated time to our country in mid-nineties. Some silly people dared to talk just after tragic crash of USSR that we not more needed advanced weapons, that design and produce such great machines just waste of resources! Truth was so different, obviously...
The lack of the tail rotor makes the helicopter quite a bit shorter, very handy for landing them on ships. Less storage room and a smaller landing zone.
Также это единственный в мире вертолёт с системой катапультирования экипажа.
После прыгает, парашют будет?
@@jeritom4158 yes, this system has parachute in pilot suit. But rocket take out only pilot, not armchair like on many jets.
Там с такой силой дергает пилота, что остаться инвалидом 50на50. Очень большая вероятность получить перелом позвоночника.
@@balacaii это тебе кто такую чушь сказал?
@@3aTMeHuePa3yMa Мой знакомый военный реабилитолог. Во время катапультирования идет огромное воздействие на позвоночник. Выбитые позвонки это самое малое что может случится, очень часто позвоночник просто ломает. После катапультирования очень немногие могут вернутся в строй. Это уже от организма зависит как быстро он восстановится или не восстановится совсем.
honestly an incredible feat of engineering. excellent video! a lot of work obviously went into it, and it's very comprehensive
one of these helicopter got hit in the tail by manpad.
if it wasn't for it's coaxial rotors
it would already be already shutdown.
But still manage to fly back to base for repairs.
Esse helicóptero é uma maravilha!😍
People call ka52 trash because it's Russian made. But fail to realize that ka52 is facing a country with air defense unlike what the US fought in the middle east "farmers in sandals and ak" buts still a lot of apaches been shot down wen their enemy doesn't have anti air
Наши боевые вертолёты и истребители - лучшие в мире.
This is so amazing and well explained!
Thanks AiTelly💖
Always welcome 😁
The Bradley and leo hunter himself
Хорошая работа по 3D анимации,продолжайте в том же духе!
4:22 "Moving down the left side"
*PROCEEDS TO SHOW RIGHT SIDE*
Thanks a lot for uploading this, I bought a KA-52 from a sketch albanian guy the other day to help me go to town because I live in the mountains but I have no idea how it works. Now that I saw its capability, I can't wait to try out this dangerous maneuver later when I go to the nearest town to buy provisions.
@@DinoDude3044 is it legal to show on instagram?
Almost normal review but many mistakes in parameters... 9K121 Vikhr-1 range is 10 km (supersonic, 28 second to max range), S-8OFP1 range is 6 km, and at the 5th and 6th hardpoints are 9S846 "Strelets" (Archer) with modified missile based on 9K338 Igla-S (not the same, with different flight profile and characteristics). And many other types of ammunition aren't been mentioned at all...
Как вы это сделали??? Восторг! Очень и очень классная анимация.
this is the best helicopter. Even aesthetic wise
Ka-52 Best of the bests.
The most sexy, the most deadly, the most impressive combat helicopter on Earth today. Not only that, but it's the only helicopter in the world pilots can eject from and they have. Russian pilots have ejected from these in combat and survived. Russian engineering is beautiful stuff 🤌
yeah, we saw how capable it is... :D
i have seen on telegram a KA52 downed with the crew burned to death inside. The Rotors were still there, so no ejection.
@@alexanderk7776 well when you send a low flying (compared to jet fighters) slow, aircraft into a modern battlefield where it isn't just people in AK-47s in turbines. Where there's an actual professional army that it has been equipped with thousands of MANPADS, you will lose some helicopters although unlike in the Apache and other Far West NATO produced junk, people in the ka-52 have a 99% chance of surviving the initial attack on the aircraft after they eject from it and land safely on the ground
@@alexanderk7776 I'm on telegram and I've never seen this video and if it does exist, it exists because the pilots made an emergency landing because they were able to salvage the helicopter and there was no point to eject. Turn your brain on westerner, I know it's next to impossible but try.
@@stanley1554 crazy propoganda lol there's plenty of videos of these being shot down with no ejection visible..
Nice to see a unbiased, and well informed video in this era of misinformation
Thank You
That's a helicopter.
Apache nervously smoking away.
😁
yeap
ua-cam.com/video/NegrPmG81PQ/v-deo.html
Apache good too , but Ka52 more safety for crew
Check the recent ka52 losses before coping
@@dew7025 бро и формула один может быть ужасной в руках новичка
Нихрена не понял, но видео понравилось. 😜
:)
Apache Helicopter has no modern combat experience .
great content, great animation, great explanation, great video🔥🔥🔥🔥
Thanks man for the Feedback
1) Для диванных экспертов. Катапультирование опасно для жизни пилота, и никто не будет его использовать, если есть другой вариант. 2) Почему никто не отметил его живучесть в бою? Бой в Гостомеле показал на сколько он долго может держаться в воздухе и вести бой. Ка-52 выдержал 2-3 попадания из ПЗРК(Stinger), сотню пуль, которые попадали в двигатель, и после этого он приземлился спокойно, экипаж высадился и был эвакуирован. Полное видео спокойно можно найти в интернете.
Або на дні києвського моря,досі пілотів дістаємо.
@@keepkalm3693древние укры ещё море выкопали? Не знал..
including this point
KA 52 can fly without tail 😏😏😏
💎🇷🇺❤️🇷🇺💎
this is one of thos rare vids where it aged well and look at the people seetheing lamo
she did not mention that KA-52 has a VITEBSK 25 electronic warfare Jamming system.
I wanted to see the mechanics of the contra rotating shafts, but oh well it was still interesting. These craft can fly sideways and backwards, and are more maneuverable than regular choppers.
Seeing these in action is revealing, they are also tough when hit, the pilots rarely eject and usually a second one rescues them ASAP. As for their destructive capability.. The videos almost look fake, they go in under fire using their flares and chaff, one video showed it hitting 23 targets while evading ground fire. The Russians don't waste these babies, they put them to work 👍
If u notice that there are kamovs being taken down it's because they are in the frontline against an enemy who has modern anti-aircraft systems and obviously it's way different than fighting against Muslims with just AK's, when the Apaches get into a real war there will be many deceases.
The Russians pilots are well trained and the kamov is a good machine, if there are some of these destroyed that's because the enemy has guns to fire back unlike the poor countries in the middle east.
Oh of course there are losses but I mean if you go to oryx you will see like 43 maybe. But if you closely inspect each and everyone you will see like only quarter the number is verified. Same goes for ukranian losses. Inspect each image and you will see the real losses are like 50%.
Incredible work and unbiased. Helicopter is just incredible
I AM GOING TO BUY THIS HELICOPTER
Best looking helicopter
Viktr missiles have more than 8km range, theres footage of a KA-52 in Donbass engaging and destroying Max Pros Mraps and M2A2 bradleys from ranges of over 17km ( this was calculated by taking the speed of the missile into consideration and how long it took to reach these targets) .
The 2A42 30mm cannon although mounted in a limiting position is also on the Mi-28s but they're almost fully traversable yet both are totally useless. This isnt like in the Iraq war or Afghan where the air space is uncontested and surface to air threats are all neutralized nor as sophisticated as what the Ukrainians are fielding. You simply cant maintain altitude and utilize thermals and the autocannon to take out soft threats from far like in previous conflicts . The viktr missiles are multipurpose and can be use to target soft targets from further and at a lower altitude where as the Shipunov's 30mm would be heard from miles away.
One thing you should have mention is the advanced targetting system and CCIP of the KA-52s that basically make it possible for the pilots to target enemies extremely accurately with cheap non smart munitions such as the S-8 and S-13 rockets where as the NATO/western countries use munitions that have guidance built into the weapon itself. This basically means the pilot of the ka-52 can use cheaper, more readily available munitions just as effectively as the more expensive munitions being used on stuff like the AH-64D which cost way more.
I have always admired Kamov and his designs, I had always considered her among the best in creativity, unfortunately as often happens in the defense industry, whoever has the most political power wins the contracts and Kamov has less political power compared to MIL , for those who don't know the Chinese Z-10 helicopter was designed by Kamov for the Chinese government
КА-52🦈💪👍👍👍
Лучший вертолет !!! Очень живучий, быстрый, надежный, мощный и чертовски красивый!!
Качественное 3D.
Несмотря на ошибки.
Мені здається що aitelly зроблять чудову анімацію навіть про рогатку. І в них це буде «суперзброя».
Ка-52 объективно прекрасный обоазец вертолётной инженерной мысли. Подвижность, вооружение, выживаемость экипажа превосходят американских "Апачей"
Ka-50 (BLACK SHARK)
Ka-52 (ALIGATOR)
this channel deserves more followers. great animations and narration.
Very amazing Russian helicopter
I love this channel. Animations are so well done, and I get to learn fun facts. Also, the discussions and debates in the comments are very interesting, since often the commenters are from different countries that oppose each other. Much love from the US.
Thanks love from one Animator to Another
@@Aitelly 😉
This aligator has been destroyed leopard 2, i have seen the video 😮.
Very informative with superb 3D animation. Bravo!
Glad you liked it!
У вас в анимации на 6:25 не 9К121 "Вихрь", а 9М123 "Хризантема". Это ПТУР наземного базирования.
The Ka-52 proved to be excellent in real combat, so Russia ordered half a hundred such machines..👍
Proved where
@@dew7025
- In computer games, nowhere else.
Dear...I really appreciate your work
Again!: finally! You read my mind 😭💝❤️
Always welcome.
Trying our best to understand these machines.