He's so funny, which is why I got an A+ or 100 on my midterm! It helped me remember this topic that I kept forgetting no matter how hard I studied. I finally remembered it!!! Bless You Paul Sargent!!!!
Well and simplified history of modern European history. I am from India and just want to understand European history. you explained it very nicely. thanks
The British never talked about the source of finance that made the industrial revolution possible. Also, who provided the market, as the industrial revolution was not self-sustaining. The answer was India, particularly Bengal, which the British want to hide. Bengal was occupied, in practice, by the British, in 1757. Industrial Revolution started in 1760.
You know that initially, industrial power came from wind (windmills) and water (waterwheels), such as the wheel at Styal Mill in Cheshire? Coal and steam power came some time past the early industrial revolution.
I am still confused about which reason consider as the most important that makes Britain the first started the Industrial Revolution. Is it the supply of capitals or the raw materials or the government protection for property right??
The first and most important Industrial Revolution, quite simply, was, not very rich James Watt's INVENTION of the world's first PRACTICAL High Pressure Steam Engine in a not very rich Scotland. It was a Power Revolution. James Watt dumped Newcomen's Atmospheric Power and Arkwright's Water-Power for High Pressure Steam Power. For the first time in human history we had something to replace and vastly outnumber the rare 2000 years old Water-wheel, which meant, thousands more Factories springing up everywhere, not just by flowing rivers of water. Powered Utilities, Steamboats, Steam everything and Locomotives. Imagine what the Industrial Revolution would have looked like without James Watt's High Pressure Steam Engine. It wouldn't have happened!
It was a Power Revolution. In Britain from 1800 1900. 20,000 Waterwheels declined in number. Windmills declined in number. Englishman Thomas Newcomen's 1500 Atmospheric Pumps disappeared. Scotsman James Watt's 500 Steam Engines and their descendants increased in number to 10,000,000 !!! For every SINGLE Waterwheel in 1800 we now had an additional 500 Steam Engines in 1900. If that's not an Industrial Revolution, I don't know what is ! That's like an extra 10,000,000 Waterwheels you can put anywhere! It was an increase in the total Power Supply of the whole country of between 400 and 500 times !!! A percentage increase of between 40,000% and 50,000% !!! I was surprised myself when I saw these numbers. James Watt's Invention of the world's first PRACTICAL Steam Powered Engine in Scotland was the one and only Invention that created the Industrial Revolution. It was a Power Revolution! All those other Invention, including Textile machinery were just the natural development of society, science, and knowledge of the world. The Steam Engine changed every Industry, Factories could multiply like bunnies! Steamships Locomotives and entirely new industries. It wasn't an improvement, it was a giant leap! And all thanks to James Watt.
Well as usual this explanation is flawed because it singles out Brittain while there is a much more complex build up to something where the steamengine became a defining puzzle piece.
What a load of hogwash!!! According to this person we just happened to build factories- for no particular reason- wow. I live in the middle of the UNESCO World Heritage Site, the Amber Valley, Derbyshire, UK, where the industrial revolution started and the amount of people who say what Paul Sargent says is amazing. Nobody really knows why the industrial revolution started here, in the UK. The reason? Because the Brits' Empire started in India, which became the "Jewel in the Crown". We traded with India, from 1601 and from 1757 we absolutely destroyed India. India had the best textiles and cottons etc which the East India Company, (which you fail to mention) imported. Eventually, the UK government erected trade barriers against the EIC's textiles imports as it was making the home cottage industry workers unemployed. You fail also to mention that the Land Enclosures kicked the Commoners off what had been their lands for centuries, forcing them in to towns and cities, desperate for work. Arkwright didn't just suddenly decide to build factories!!!! He wanted to export home produced textiles cheaply (with cotton from the slave industry- also neglected by you) with all too readily available employees and necessity being the mother of invention, the mills were designed with their new equipment. Coal wasn't used with these mills- they were water mills!!!! Coal came into things a bit later on, especially with the advent of the railways and steam pumps etc. So, because the Brits were in India, creating devastation, we exported our textiles to India AFTER we'd decimated their textile trade. This is the nature of the Europeans and why so many people persist in this racist attitude of ignorance in perpetuating the myths of the reasons for the start of the industrial revolution. My own Conservative M.P. (Member of Parliament) DOESN'T know why the ind rev started here. She is going to persist with the Eurocentric and racist teaching in schools which people like Paul Sargent so ignorantly advocate. (See Vinay Lal on youtube and others).
bless paul sargent, you carried me through my euro midterm
+JopYT So good to hear! I hope you did well.
Paul Sargent I got a 50/50, thanks a ton!
He's so funny, which is why I got an A+ or 100 on my midterm! It helped me remember this topic that I kept forgetting no matter how hard I studied. I finally remembered it!!! Bless You Paul Sargent!!!!
1:58-6:40
Thank you so much! I love these!
Oh my goodness, how cheesy is that Mt Rushmore LOL. I LOL'd so hard Paul.
*****
((thumbsup)) :)
Thank you so much from Luxembourg (international school)
Well and simplified history of modern European history. I am from India and just want to understand European history. you explained it very nicely. thanks
+Sahaj Maheshwari glad I could help.
This helped relieve some stress before my AP test, thanks so much for this vid!
Great video! Thanks so much! You explained it fantastically !
+SIRiMAC Glad to hear it! Thanks for watching.
I wonder whether you are going to upload new videos or not? Please continue.
The British never talked about the source of finance that made the industrial revolution possible. Also, who provided the market, as the industrial revolution was not self-sustaining.
The answer was India, particularly Bengal, which the British want to hide. Bengal was occupied, in practice, by the British, in 1757. Industrial Revolution started in 1760.
tysm for helping me massively with my essay!
Great video, watched it today in class.
+Sylveon thanks!
Concise and helpful! Thank you so much for your videos!
You know that initially, industrial power came from wind (windmills) and water (waterwheels), such as the wheel at Styal Mill in Cheshire? Coal and steam power came some time past the early industrial revolution.
subbing for the mt. rushmore
I am still confused about which reason consider as the most important that makes Britain the first started the Industrial Revolution. Is it the supply of capitals or the raw materials or the government protection for property right??
Prob raw materials, coal especially because it helped with production
@@thgreenman commercial law and property rights.
That was beautiful
thx for this :)
Thank you!
The first and most important Industrial Revolution, quite simply, was, not very rich James Watt's INVENTION of the world's first PRACTICAL High Pressure Steam Engine in a not very rich Scotland.
It was a Power Revolution.
James Watt dumped Newcomen's Atmospheric Power and Arkwright's Water-Power for High Pressure Steam Power.
For the first time in human history we had something to replace and vastly outnumber the rare 2000 years old Water-wheel, which meant, thousands more Factories springing up everywhere, not just by flowing rivers of water. Powered Utilities, Steamboats, Steam everything and Locomotives.
Imagine what the Industrial Revolution would have looked like without James Watt's High Pressure Steam Engine.
It wouldn't have happened!
It was a Power Revolution.
In Britain from 1800 1900.
20,000 Waterwheels declined in number.
Windmills declined in number.
Englishman Thomas Newcomen's 1500 Atmospheric Pumps disappeared.
Scotsman James Watt's 500 Steam Engines and their descendants increased in number to 10,000,000 !!!
For every SINGLE Waterwheel in 1800 we now had an additional 500 Steam Engines in 1900.
If that's not an Industrial Revolution, I don't know what is ! That's like an extra 10,000,000 Waterwheels you can put anywhere!
It was an increase in the total Power Supply of the whole country of between 400 and 500 times !!!
A percentage increase of between 40,000% and 50,000% !!!
I was surprised myself when I saw these numbers.
James Watt's Invention of the world's first PRACTICAL Steam Powered Engine in Scotland was the one and only Invention that created the Industrial Revolution.
It was a Power Revolution!
All those other Invention, including Textile machinery were just the natural development of society, science, and knowledge of the world.
The Steam Engine changed every Industry, Factories could multiply like bunnies! Steamships Locomotives and entirely new industries.
It wasn't an improvement, it was a giant leap!
And all thanks to James Watt.
Capital that came from slavery, surplus of material, food and spanish gold from Britain's colonial territories and privateering.
Good Lecture, but Instead of Industrial Revolution, Evolution or gradual development is a better description.
oh god why
Bien vu rhoya
FF to 2:00 , subject begins after that
JamesWatt's steam powered engine was, the British industrial revolution.
James Watt only improved it. Newocomnen invented the original steam engine.
👍
Well as usual this explanation is flawed because it singles out Brittain while there is a much more complex build up to something where the steamengine became a defining puzzle piece.
PICADOOOOOOOOOOOO
Capitalism and astrong justice system was the main factor.
What a load of hogwash!!! According to this person we just happened to build factories- for no particular reason- wow. I live in the middle of the UNESCO World Heritage Site, the Amber Valley, Derbyshire, UK, where the industrial revolution started and the amount of people who say what Paul Sargent says is amazing. Nobody really knows why the industrial revolution started here, in the UK. The reason? Because the Brits' Empire started in India, which became the "Jewel in the Crown". We traded with India, from 1601 and from 1757 we absolutely destroyed India. India had the best textiles and cottons etc which the East India Company, (which you fail to mention) imported. Eventually, the UK government erected trade barriers against the EIC's textiles imports as it was making the home cottage industry workers unemployed. You fail also to mention that the Land Enclosures kicked the Commoners off what had been their lands for centuries, forcing them in to towns and cities, desperate for work. Arkwright didn't just suddenly decide to build factories!!!! He wanted to export home produced textiles cheaply (with cotton from the slave industry- also neglected by you) with all too readily available employees and necessity being the mother of invention, the mills were designed with their new equipment. Coal wasn't used with these mills- they were water mills!!!! Coal came into things a bit later on, especially with the advent of the railways and steam pumps etc.
So, because the Brits were in India, creating devastation, we exported our textiles to India AFTER we'd decimated their textile trade. This is the nature of the Europeans and why so many people persist in this racist attitude of ignorance in perpetuating the myths of the reasons for the start of the industrial revolution. My own Conservative M.P. (Member of Parliament) DOESN'T know why the ind rev started here. She is going to persist with the Eurocentric and racist teaching in schools which people like Paul Sargent so ignorantly advocate. (See Vinay Lal on youtube and others).
Adrian Cheale Must suck to hate your own people and history.
Bet you're fun at parties
a load of hogwash is totally accurate for this video lol thanks for an enlightening comment comrade
Why did it happen in Briton , you are missing the whole point .
jmuld1 that was the whole point of the video he gave a ton of reasons why... they are even numbered
Britain*
SPELING GRAH.