Soon we will be visiting other moons, particularly the icy moons of the fifth and sixth planets, which might even have life forms below their crusts. The minor planet between the fourth (Mars) and fifth (Jupiter) planets, Ceres, has ice in its craters, and the minor planet Pluto, like Earth, is sort of a double-planet, in that its moon Charon is proportionately large (the Earth and Moon orbit a point just inside the Earth's surface, but Pluto and Charon have a mid-point closer to Pluto around which they both orbit in gravitational balance).
And if the cloud bursts, thunder in your ear You shout and no one seems to hear. And if the band you're in starts playing different tunes Well I'll see you on the dark side of the moon.
I'm just curious what the chicoms were doing on the dark side, and don't give me that story about space farming, they can't even farm enough down here to feed themselves, they put a weapon up there which we can't see.
From the Philippines🇵🇭. Good afternoon Sir. I AGREE that the moon has something to do with a human behavior. One remarkable observation is the wife of my son. When the moon began in its FULL MOON JOURNEY AND PROCESS IN THE SKY, SHE ALWAYS CURSE AND CALL BAD NAMES TO MY POOR SON FOR ALMOST 10 YEARS NOW. ACCUSING MY SON HAVING AN ELLICIT AFFAIR. MY SON IS IN THE SEA FOR 8 MONTHS EVERY YEAR MANEUVERING THEIR SHIP AS A SEAMAN. I AM FORCED TO CALL HER LUNATIC BUT ONLY TO MYSELF THANK YOU SIR. PLEASE BE SAFE ALWAYS. 🙏
Full moon means more light and I think wolves and man do more with more light. Not because it "affects" them, it's just easier to do stuff when you can see better.
bob brooks haha! I never thought of that. Wouldnt it let everything see better then? And humans and wolves would not be the only ones acting different due to better visibility? Like squirrels and bunny's?
July 1963. Aboard boat at sundown taking me from Venice, Italy, to the Lido (Venice's swim beach on an Adriatic-Sea barrier island). Terrible wails coming from a large, windowless building that jutted out of the water to our right. I asked my Italian friend what it was. He pointed to the full moon rising and said two words, "Insane asylum." I pursued the point, and found that, though they could not see outside, they could sense the full moon, and it upset them a lot. Case 2: Ft. Worth, TX, 1975. A 6-ft. hedge in Bob's backyard. Left half neatly trimmed at 6 ft. Right half a wild mess with 9-ft. flier branches sticking out all over. Wild side pruned 4 days after neat side, but on a day that the Farmer's Almanac did not say was good for pruning vegetation. The neat half, though pruned considerably earlier, was pruned on a good day for the task. Why good? Because the moon was right. I recommend that you doubters buy almanacs and strike blows for empiricism through conducting your own botanical experiments. Or, you can continue to pontificate without a clue. The growing season is about to begin, so let the experiments begin! Come September, I expect to see numerous chats, etc., about how the moon affects EVERTHING. Spread the word. Let's get this show on the road. Germinate peas, beans, etc. against the moon's advice. Get the kids involved. Learn what people who grew up on farms and ranches have known forever. The moon not only "affects" (your quotes,not mine) us, but controls us. I don't know how you city folk get by without almanacs. Heck, you don't even have a way to determine all the myriad ways that the moon, sun, etc., influence each of us continually, 24-365.
@se7en You leftists are the HATERS... You call all Trump backers racist, when, like the leftists, actually only 5% are racist, thus DIVIDING and inciting serious social unrest which is hurting ALL of the country's good tasks, goals and ideal productivites.
Its interesting stuff, but I hate the presentation--the fast-slo-mo tracking shots, the weak synth-rock and the over-dramatised narration. Just the choice of language is annoying; the 'lunar Cataclysm' as opposed to the more descriptive and scientifically accepted 'Late Heavy Bombardment'. And the basaltic up-welling origin of the lunar seas they discuss here has been discredited for more than twenty years.
I agree. This kind of presentation seemed to be pretty common in older cable TV documentaries. I'm not sure if it's still common today since I don't watch channels like Discovery or NatGeo anymore. I've grown to prefer more amateur UA-cam presentations far more than these.
Were always wondering about the devastation a meteor could have on our planet and how could we prevent such a catastrophe. But we might want to put that same effort into protecting the moon from a similar impact.
This is the prediction in the bible. That something will hit our MOON & knock it out of its orbit....causing the oceans to sway like a drunkard. It eventually ends life on earth but not immediately as it would if earth was hit....giving the last humans time to repent & ask God to forgive them.
@@nickisnyder3450 Forgive them for *_WHAT?_* Forgive them for the effects of a lunar impactor that GOD supposedly created? This makes no logical sense.
@@nialldargan4929 THE PRECISE, SIMPLE, TOP DOWN, AND CLEAR DERIVATION, ORIGIN, MEANING, AND CONSTRUCTION OF E=MC2: E=mc2 is taken directly from F=ma. BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is fundamental. Carefully consider what is THE SUN AND what is the speed of light (c) ON BALANCE. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the NIGHT SKY. So, consider what is THE BLACK “space” of what is THE EYE. The sky is blue, AND what is THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE !! c squared is CLEARLY understood as a dimension (of what constitutes SPACE) ON BALANCE, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity ON/IN BALANCE !!! GREAT !!! I have CLEARLY explained or proven the mathematical unification of gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy (ON/IN BALANCE), as I have demonstrated the fourth dimension AND the term c4 from Einstein's field equations (along with TIME); as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). I have proven how and why this is mathematically consistent with F=ma AND E=mc2. TIME dilation ultimately proves on balance that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). In light of what has been CLEARLY proven here (on BALANCE), think about what is THE SUN in DIRECT comparison to/with what is outer “space”. GREAT !!! It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense, as BALANCE and completeness go hand in hand. I'm going to more precisely explain the true origin (and the full meaning) of the equation E=mc2. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is (CLEARLY and necessarily) proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). This also CLEARLY explains, on balance, why and how this equation represents a two dimensional surface OR SPACE as what is a BALANCED AVERAGE. Indeed, gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are (CLEARLY) linked AND BALANCED opposites (on balance); as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity (on/in balance) !!! Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. Indeed, TIME is necessarily possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity (on/in balance). Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE on balance, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity ON/IN BALANCE. This explains F=ma AND E=mc2. This ALSO explains why the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution. Inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). This explains F=ma AND E=mc2. I have truly (and fundamentally) revolutionized what is our understanding of physics/physical experience. Compare the setting and orange Sun with the fully illuminated and setting/WHITE Moon DIRECTLY. They do basically appear to give off the same illumination, in fact. Notice that the curvature or shape of said Moon matches that of THE EARTH/ground (given a clear horizon, that is). What is THE SUN AND what is THE MOON are then the SAME SIZE in the sky as what is THE EYE. Moreover, these two forms manifest (or form up) at what is EYE LEVEL/body height. GREAT !!! Now, I have CLEARLY proven why AND how this is so. The tides are (CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY) ELECTROMAGNETIC/gravitational ON BALANCE. Magnificent !!! The tides are CLEARLY and necessarily subject to F=ma AND E=mc2, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Again, the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky; and the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution. The sky is blue, and THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE. Excellent. I have explained why the sizes of said Moon and said Sun are the same as what is THE EYE ON BALANCE. So, I have CLEARLY explained why the diameter of the Moon is about one quarter (at 27 percent) in size compared with what is THE EARTH. How does what is the Sun survive or exist against what is outer “space" ? The answer is, ON BALANCE, invisible AND VISIBLE SPACE in fundamental equilibrium and BALANCE. Here's why. (Think about TIME as well.) WHAT IS THE EXPLANATION OF SPACE AND TIME ON BALANCE: Invisible AND VISIBLE SPACE in fundamental equilibrium AND BALANCE. This necessarily and clearly involves interaction, on balance. Consider what is the eye (on balance). Logically consider what is a two dimensional surface OR SPACE ON BALANCE !!!! Notice the associated DOME AND the flat/black “space” of WHAT IS the eye AS WELL. Really think about it all. Consider WHAT IS THE SUN ON BALANCE. (NOW, think about time.) Outer “space” involves full inertia, AND it is fully invisible AND black. Consider one and three dimensions ON BALANCE !!! Now, consider what is the fourth dimension and the term c4 from Einstein's field equations. Think about ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy AND think about gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Consider what is the man (AND THE EYE ON BALANCE) who IS actually standing ON what is THE EARTH/ground (ON BALANCE) !! Think about TIME !! Think about why there is something instead of nothing ON BALANCE. Consider that time is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE. Think about the man (THE EYE) that actually IS IN what is outer “space”. Think about time. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE, and consider what is the speed of light (c) ON BALANCE. NOW, consider what is THE SUN. Think closely about everything in this writing. Balance and completeness go hand in hand. Magnificent. ❤️ c squared CLEARLY means an INTERACTION on balance, as the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Balanced inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is fundamental. Consider E and “m" on balance. Great. The fourth dimension is only consistent with what is (on balance) a TWO dimensional surface OR SPACE ON BALANCE. Consider what is the eye. Consider what is the balanced MIDDLE DISTANCE in/of SPACE (ON/IN BALANCE). Consider invisible AND VISIBLE SPACE in fundamental equilibrium AND BALANCE. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE. So, consider what is the speed of light (c) ON BALANCE. This CLEARLY explains the fourth dimension AND the term c4 from Einstein's field equations. Time is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE, as BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is fundamental pursuant to F=ma AND E=mc2 in balance. A galaxy consists of invisible AND VISIBLE SPACE in fundamental equilibrium and BALANCE, thereby eliminating the need for any "dark" "matter" or "dark" "energy"; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is then CLEARLY gravity ON/in BALANCE. By Frank DiMeglio
*affected. Affect is the verb. Effect is the noun. If you forget, think of “special effects.” They are things, so they are nouns, not verbs. If you don’t know the difference between a verb and a noun, it frightens me that you are a nurse.
Science told me I would only need one shot for covid Hang on 2 Wooo you need 3 We think you be fully covered if you have your 2 shots plus 2 boosters to give your immune system maximum defence Oh I'm Pfizer booster shots seem to be ineffective within weeks Yeah science Rock solid 👍
I cannot believe the Risks to those astronauts by driving about at 15 or 20 miles per hour on a golf cart . It doesn’t make any sense whatsoever. To go all that way then have to drive a few miles more - racing across rocky terrain with perhaps rocks or holes capable of tipping the thing over. It’s unbelievable how they got away with it . 😮
I wish there was some discussion on why the far side of the moon has a thicker crust. Does the computer model about the accretion theory explain this. Are there as many impact craters on the far side as on the near side?
i' ve seen a theory while watching an university stream about the moon, that it might be because the accreation disc actually formed 2 moons first with very similar velocity, but the one in the "behind" was a bit faster, but not enough to crash, instead it merged... so the far side is thicker because is one ball "splated" on the back of the other one... sorry for my english,hope it make sence... :) to answer your other question, yes,there is many of impact crater on the far side,but no seas, because is thicker,so it would not cause the magma to resurface
i learned some really interesting facts from this documentary. i knew the moon had effects on the earth but never to that extent!!. Really interesting stuff.
@@mattematsson554 WHY E=MC2 IS NECESSARILY F=MA (ON BALANCE), AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity AS SPACE ON BALANCE: TIME DILATION ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that E=MC2 IS F=ma, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Hence, the Earth AND the Sun are CLEARLY E=MC2 AND F=ma IN BALANCE. (The sky is blue, AND the Earth is ALSO BLUE.) A PHOTON may be placed at the center of WHAT IS THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the speed of light (c); AS E=MC2 IS F=MA !!!; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. BALANCE and completeness go hand in hand. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ("Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !!!) Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=mC2 IS F=ma IN BALANCE !!!; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. (Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE.) E=mC2 IS F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Great !!! Again, BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense. By Frank DiMeglio
What does the moon have to do with Michael Jacksons Perp Walk. I jest. I'm a big fan of Michaels, I think he had issues, but I think he was misunderstood. I believe it stemmed from an abusive childhood.
Bit of a factual error.... 3:34 "Between 1969 and 1972 six missions blasted off to the moon. Only 12 humans have ever walked on the moon." Not entirely correct. Apollo 13 blasted off for the moon. It even got there but didn't land. Apollo 10 also got to the moon and orbited but didn't set down. Apollos 11, 12, 14, 15, 16 and 17 did land and those carried the 12 astronauts lucky enough to walk on the moon.
John Davies ...proofs please gentleman, that you say not, do not mean anything, it is completely irrelevant, if you want people to believe on you, stop spitting word with not value and present proofs.
@Sub or you are against Trump in 2020 If you let weed fuck up your life your week I agree if your week dont smoke Now drugs are a whole different story Drugs will ruin anybody one way or the other Drugs are bad UMKAY
Dude, I was watching something else and fell asleep, and then youtube put that on, and i started to have the most awesome dreams about me on a spacecraft ahahahah
If you reversed it's direction by doing the math backward...have the moon getting closer instead of further away...would disprove the earths millions of years old theories.
Travid, I agree, It's just a hood- wanking video on unproven theory, and another dead end, just like this one >> The Relationship Between The Earth, Moon And The Sun [Amazing Documentary].
@@robbiewright4414 Totally agree. Scientists today speak of historical science as if it were just provable science. Yet historical science can't even pass the scientific method to actually prove it's a fact! It's as if the scientific method is no longer needed to become a scientist. Actually it is no longer needed. There are biologists that only deal with organisms they can't see. Then they actually fill in gaps with ridiculous "links" with animals they just make up like it's no big deal. Give us some respect. I have no problem wondering how things began...it's who we are...just don't try and tell the world your way of thinking is the only way. I'd be better to be honest so you can show everyone all the different ways people think it happened and why.
Unfortunately it’s not true. Scientists know now that the rock that makes up the moon is older than our entire solar system. The moon is actually older than our sun. I wonder how old this documentary is, because this is a very outdated theory?? I wonder if they are still teaching this in schools??
Correction: Americans start to believe the link between werewolf and the moon is true. Interbreeding does that to a society. Mind you, I too was a teenage werewolf, but I'm alright nooooooooowwww!
I think that a lot of imagination has planted fear in our minds over the centuries! Just like Corona, Climate, NWO and Agenda2030 (created by Rockefeller 1992) does today.
Wow, I thought I was the only one who couldn't (and still can't) see the Man in the Moon! As a kid I thought my friends were pulling my leg when they said they saw him lol
Just like all the people that think a full moon actually changes human behavior. If a full moon changes human behavior it's because they are emotional and psychological state and/or belief system allows that to happen. Cuz the moon's always there. There's a common misconception that it's biggest when it's full. A full moon is just light hitting one side of it illuminating it for us to see. There's times when the new moon is there.. when it's completely dark and it's just as close but no one says anything about that. Changes in human behavior due to any gravitational effect of the moon has not been proven. And furthermore... For those that are reading that seem to think I'm wrong... If the moon had the power to shift the liquids in your body... It would have a physical effect on you before it had any kind of emotional or psychological effect. And if the moon pulled the liquids in your body to one side of you I would imagine you would swell and it would be very uncomfortable. Please someone if you can correct me with scientific evidence then I will stand corrected. But Hollywood and a lot of really ridiculous movies and written stories from generations past have had way too much of an influence on the intelligence level of modern society. If you're reading this that means you have access to the internet and you're more than likely using a smart device. Use it to learn something.😂😂
36:06 there is a clip of a radio transmission with a female voice played. It was also used in the ending credits of COPS and in the game City of Heroes when you pass a police drone.
It's always been common knowledge to me that more people are out during a full moon because they can see without a flashlight for one ,and if you're doing something wrong other people can see them also.
For my space friends out there that can help me. Can a sine wave ride the earth’s magnetic wave through space? Can 3 phases positively charged rods create a synthetic “DC” wave, can a negatively charged 3 phase rods collect the sine wave produced by the positively charged rods. Would you need “4 phases” the 4th phase being the center ground to help collect the positively charged rods. Would you need 3 phases in sync or 3 phases in their own phase to produce proper power to transmit the perfect voltage through air? If you capped the signal and added more "emitting" rods to the side of the emitter could you direct that power to multiple "collectors"? (1 power point to multiple collectors.) Could the collectors reach out a grab 2 phases to help switch between the collectors? Can electricity ride a magnetic wave? Can you send a sine wave from the southern hemisphere to northern hemisphere? Could you send an electron from earth to moon? Can you control shooting electricity in space since there is no ground in space? would the electricity grab on to the minerals in space? Could a space craft be negatively charged and be propelled by the protons presented by the sun in the solar wind (Like magnetic theory)? Also how far out does the solar wind reach. If solar wind is only great at near the closet planets, can we "ride" that wind for the faster means of travel. If you used laser acceleration to push a craft through space would you have enough energy from earth to propel it? would you need satellites to help push? Can a laser pulse from 1 satellite charge up another satellite? If so, could you "Daisey chain" or line of sight the satellites to help charge one other.
Something major happened in the history of the solar system to cause all this damage we see the results of today . Pluto has an extreme elliptical orbit around the sun, Uranus is tipped on its side , and Mars was hit with a huge impact that caused a big bulge on one side of the planet .The result was a massive volcanic system with the biggest volcano (Olympus Mons) which is three times higher than Mt. Everest and the size of Texas as well as the biggest canyon in the entire solar system Valles Merineris at 2500 miles , long and 23,000 ft deep . Mars also has an elliptical orbit more extreme than any other planet aside from Pluto . And then there's Venus which has a day that's longer than its year and its spinning backwards counter to all the other planets . Additionally the entire surface was refaced at some point in its past which most likely was the cause for the loss of all its water . The same could be said for Mars as well . In the case of Venus its rotation is slowing down and will eventually be reversed back to the way other planets rotate . Obviously something major happened in our solar system to cause these things . It possible that a rogue planet came through the system and wreaked havoc as it passed through. Aside from the cometary debris that our planet passes through every year there are thousands of asteroids that are within the inner solar system which could tell us a lot more about the history of the early solar system and what has happened . Given the orbits of several Kuiper belt objects, i.e. objects such as comets that reside beyond the orbit of Pluto, many astronomers are now pretty certain that a planet of at least the size of Earth but possibly much bigger than Earth is lurking beyond the outer bounds of the solar system and could be in an extreme long elliptical orbit around the sun . Other scientist have also postulated the possibility of a brown dwarf otherwise known as a failed star which is essentially a gas giant bigger than Jupiter in an extremely long orbit around our star which would make sense since most stars have a companion star traveling with them from birth . A brown dwarf would be too dim to be seen but could be detected via a new highly sensitive infrared space telescope . Hopefully once the James Webb space telescope is up and running and operating smoothly we'll have an answer to some of these important questions . Even if we don't find a companion star or a big planet roaming around the edges of the solar system there's still countless rogue worlds within our galaxy that could have been the cause for the destruction we see in our now stable system . The big question is for how long will this stability last until the next time ?
"Obviously something major happened in our solar system to cause these things." Yeah, it was called the violent birth of the solar system. Natural forces. Your comment is a whole bunch of nothing disguised as actual perspicacity.
If another star is circling around the solar system, then we would see that in movements of the planets and the Sun, in much the same way as Neptune was discovered. As we have seen no irregularities that have not been explained, it is extremely unlikely that another star is close by.
Cant it be several events? What about t theory now of a earlier or younger solar system with more planets? That eventually hit each others and what we see now is the results of it?
Cant it be several events? What about t theory now of a earlier or younger solar system with more planets? That eventually hit each others and what we see now is the results of it?
Sure there is some connection between Earth, Moon and the Sun affecting each other's magnetic fields! They all stay there, in space, hung on their own so imagine the strength of that field in each and every case of a planet!
Saturn does not have the most moons in our solar system Jupiter does with 63. How can a documentary get something so simple wrong?. Makes me doubt the rest of the information.
You can doubt as much as you want, but the thing with Jupiter is that, between 2015 and 2018, 14 moons were discovered, bringing their number to 79. And who knows when was this documentary made - it was posted in 2016. And, on the other hand, Saturn lost 62 of his moons so far (moons that were discovered but have since disappeared). Both of them are HUGE and the number of moons (most of them being actually captured asteroids and other junk) changes constantly, year to year. Big ones don't, but dozens of smaller ones come and go. So when you say "makes me doubt the rest of the information" and "how can documentary get something so simple wrong" actually points to the fact that you yourself are ignorant on the subject. And yes, depending on the time when this specific documentary was made, Saturn could have had more satellites than Jupiter and the number could have been wrong. For instance, just a month ago, number of Jupiter's moons jumped by 10, growing to current 79. Saturn, currently, 62. A month ago it was 69:62. And up to September 7th 2010 it was 63:62 for Jupiter.
It's always been common knowledge to me that more people are out during a full moon because they can see without a flashlight for one ,and if you're doing something wrong other people can see them also.
@@davidross5593 I guess you have to believe in a universal knowledge. And humans have to translate this knowledge from the subconscious to the conscious with a verbal language in order to also convey it to other people.
3:38 people who like to say we have never been to the moon point to the flag flying when there is suppose to be no wind so that's proof we haven't been there but i don't see the flag flying. It's only moving because it is being moved.
Definition of desert (from Oxford Lexico): "A dry, barren area of land, especially one covered with sand, that is characteristically desolate, waterless, and without vegetation." I would not call Antarctica dry or waterless. So calling it a desert is a bit of a stretch.
@@renedekker9806 Antarctica is very dry and waterless. All of its freshwater is in ice, so very dry. Barely any water in the air, you can see for miles and miles. Almost never rains.
The more we research, the more we'll find just how true God's word has been on everything including creation. Blessed are those who believe without seeing.
Blessed are those who open their eyes and see the true causes, for they unite the whole universe in glorious beauty. Blessed are those who believe in truth, for they will never be led astray.
Rene Dekker The truth of men is feeble, subjective and inconstant as we all know. But God’s word is the one and only truth, the life and the way. The only truth that has the ability to forgive every magnitude of sin, give you true peace, joy, and happiness. If only you believe in it with your heart.
@@The_Truth777 The truth of men is feeble, subjective and inconstant as we all know. God's physics laws are the one and only truth, the life and the way. The only truth that has the ability to give you true peace, joy, and happiness. If only you believe in it with your heart and mind together.
As for Berklund's predictions, he's just added one constant for the prediction of earthquakes, one known influencing factor that affects the Earths tectonic plates, especially when amplified by the Moons gravitational pull. Common sense dictates that the normal gravitational pull of the Sun would significantly increase the likelihood of slippage in concert with the Moon. Congratulations are in order, not derision.
Scientists & Discovery Can Cost Some Price$$$ -in * RECOGNITION ** - to these STUDIOS People & Programs , However, Governmental Bodies don’t Always Assist - Even* Pre- Warnings tv& broader Media. Once damage HAS OCCURRED, Cleanup costs are FAR GREATER in Lives & repairs if any ? COMMONSENSE SHOULD PREVAIL OVER MONETARY INTERESTS - you can’t buy back a dead loved one!!
Oh please. Don't get me started on the moon but i'ts the 2nd largest moon in the universe and its almost perfectly round? It just formed like that eh? One of only two moons two orbit their planet opposite directions. Why? Why is the dirt older than the Earth's. Why are we listening to a guy who can't even brush his teeth? why aren't we "allowed" to go on the other side of the moon? Why do Soviet efforts get blown out of the sky? Also it's enVELoped not ENveloped, dork. @19:41
"Some scientists believe" how often did i hear that in this "documentary". What really is interresting is evidence, theories, you know scientific stuff.
I really dislike this kind of journalism. It's like a fancy show for kids. They just boldly claim a lot of things with no real evidence. Sadly, that's just what modern physics, and in particular astronomy, has turned into... People should really scrutinize their claims way more. You've heard the saying "don't believe everything you hear", and that also applies to what the "scientists" claim to "know" about the universe. The fact is that there are a *lot* of things that we _don't_ know. Modern astronomy is basically just a lot of speculation presented as fact. We don't even know what the inside of the earth is made up of, even less the sun and the moon. Nobody's ever dug deep enough to say what's beneath the earth's crust, which makes up a very small fraction of the earth's radius. Nobody can claim to know exactly what is going on inside the earth. It's just speculation all of it. What is gravity? What is magnetism? What is energy? You may call some of it educated guessing but that's the extent of it. The fact remains: *We don't know!* And you can't work on the premise of, "true until proven wrong", or "it's the best answer we have now so we call it fact". That's what I hate about scientific journalism like this, that they arrogantly act like they *know* things they couldn't possibly know! That's not science! That's the _obstruction_ of science! Their bold and baseless claims are getting in the way of _actual_ scientific progress on these subjects! I wish they kept to just presenting the actual facts and spared us their arbitrary conclusions. They have an attitude like: "We're the authority on science - we know best! This is how it is and if you don't believe us you're too stupid to understand science!". If you ask me, scientific progress stopped in the late 19th century, when the world of electrical invention, science and research, spearheaded by the likes of Tesla and Steinmetz, was basically shut down, swept up and replaced with something that was *100% theoretical* and has been ever since. You can't call it fact if it's purely theoretical! You need to prove things in the _real_ world before you can claim something to be "real". General relativity, special relativity, quantum physics, particle physics - it's all 100% theoretical! They have no anchoring to the real world! And the worst part is that they contradict each other! The following conclusion is simple and pure logic: *Two statements that contradict each other cannot both be true. Either one of them is false, or both of them are.* ~ Me. This principle seems to be missing in modern physics. In my opinion, we need to go back to square one with physics, because what we have now is not holding up; It's a house of cards, it's a hollow shell, it's a facade and it's an insult to the genuine efforts of honest scientists everywhere and from every era. The current scientific community needs to take a step back, admit that they _don't know_ a lot of what they're claiming, and allow and encourage an open debate over these things. As it stands right now, any scientist presenting a hypothesis that, no matter how strongly supported by reliable evidence, goes against the _"general consensus"_ is either completely ignored, accused of using unreliable or falsified evidence material, or openly ridiculed in the scientific journals. Would you call this "fair play"? I'd like to call it ostracizing, bullying and intellectual tyranny. Like I said, they're _obstructing_ any real scientific progress.
"Imagine a world ravaged by hurricane force winds, with temperatures swinging from scorching heat to freezing cold. Imagine the day lasting just six hours in a world where only primitive lifeforms evolved…" Welcome to Arkansas in the fall. It's not that bad...only mostly.
Byte Me I know right people will believe anything. Just because someone got a theory on how things happened it doesn’t mean it’s right.. fairy tale is pretty accurate 👍🏻
Actually fairytale is just you lord book!!! This is science...means everything is a 100 % proved to be true,....this is not quantum mechanics theory....!!! Peace!!!
@@titolino73 Sorry: not really. NOTHING can be "proven" by science. That's why gravity is still a "theory". Science can only help us come up with the most probable framework for explaining the data/observations/evidence we've gathered so far. All scientific theories can be made obsolete in an instant, by the reliable discovery of data which they can't explain. That said, the scientific method is our best bet for understanding how the universe works, that we've tried so far!!
@@8800081 At the same time, when it is not 100% proven by science does not automatically mean that it is a fairytale of course. Currently, given all the evidence, scientists are pretty confident that the moon is the remnant of another heavenly body that collided with the earth long ago. That you don't share that assessment is not a reason to belittle other people.
@@dmaximus73 no consciousness you may be able to recognize.... One must admit that the fact that the moon is EXACTLY 400% closer to the Earth than the sun.... the EXACT DISTANCE it would take to offer a series of century old TOTAL ECLIPSES (amongst BILLIONS of years of lunar activity and retreat) feels less like chance and more like providence.... But hey, let's just pretend that the idea that the moon is insignificant in our evolution and a respectful and sentient race!
what i get a kick out of all these commenters trying to force their own opinion on others if you have a different opinion they call you dirty names its like grammar school allover again. bunch of grown educated adults acting like little kids on the playground
"The Earth, being 50 times bigger than the moon". The Earth is around 4 times bigger than the moon. More science fiction than science fact. Maybe they're trying to get around the fact that no other planet/moon in our solar system has even a close size relationship. They do make it sound plausible though.
No, don't confuse your religious faith for scientific knowledge. Look into the makeup of the moon and the type of rocks taken from the moon and you'll see (with scientific evidence) that the moon could only be made by a collision from another body and the earth. But if you choose to be ignorant after reading the facts then piss off.
@@OzFPVflyer HEY, WHERE ARE YOU? DID YOU DO SOME READING ON COLLISION HYPOTHESIS? DO YOU EVEN KNOW THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A HYPOTHESIS AND A THEORY? BEFORE YOU MOCK OTHERS OF THEIR OPINION, BE SURE YOU KNOW WHAT YOURE TALKING OTHERWISE YOULL LOOK LIKE AN IDIOT JUST LIKE NOW. RELIGIOUS PEOPLE HAVE FAITH. WHAT ABOUT YOU? WHAT DO YOU HAVE? IGNORANCE. YOU BELIEVE TO WHAT OTHER PEOPLE THINK SO.
@@OzFPVflyerETIQUETTE? LOOK WHOSE TALKIN? DO YOU KNOW THE WORD RECIPROCATE? I ONLY REACTED TO THE WAY YOU COMMENT IDIOT! CORRECT GRAMMAR? IS THIS AN ENGLISH CLASS? DONT YOU KNOW HOW TO READ BETWEEN THE LINES? YOU WANT TO TEACH AN AMERICAN ENGLISH, EH? BY THE WAY, DID YOU GOOGLE WHAY HYPOTHESIS IS? YOU SHOULD BE ASHAME OF YOURSELF.
THE ULTIMATE (AND CLEAR) MATHEMATICAL UNIFICATION (AND PROOF) REGARDING PHYSICS/PHYSICAL EXPERIENCE IS NOW DEMONSTRATED, AS E=MC2 IS F=MA: TIME DILATION ultimately proves (ON BALANCE) that E=mc2 IS F=ma, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. (Importantly, balance and completeness go hand in hand.) The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. NOW, A PHOTON may be placed at the center of WHAT IS THE SUN (as A POINT, of course); AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the speed of light (c); AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Indeed, ultimately and truly, TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE; AS E=MC2 IS F=MA; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black. GREAT. Accordingly, INSTANTANEITY is thus FUNDAMENTAL to what is the FULL and proper UNDERSTANDING of physics/PHYSICAL EXPERIENCE; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. E=mc2 IS F=ma. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. E=MC2 IS F=MA. GREAT !!! Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS E=mc2 is F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Consider THE MAN who is standing on what is THE EARTH/GROUND. Touch AND feeling BLEND, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Accordingly, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution. Great. MOREOVER, a given PLANET (including what is THE EARTH) then sweeps out equal areas in equal times consistent WITH/AS F=ma, E=mc2, AND what is perpetual motion; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. INSTANTANEITY is thus FUNDAMENTAL to what is the FULL and proper UNDERSTANDING of physics/physical experience, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. Stellar clustering ALSO proves ON BALANCE that E=mc2 IS F=ma, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Objects (including WHAT IS the falling MAN) fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course), as E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. "Mass"/energy is gravity. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. E=mc2 IS F=ma. THE DOME of a PERSON'S EYE is ALSO VISIBLE. (Notice the flat AND black space of what is THE EYE.) The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. The sky is blue, AND the Earth is blue. THE EARTH/ground AND THE SUN are E=mc2 AND F=ma IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS UNIVERSALLY PROVEN TO BE GRAVITY in what is a mathematically unified fashion. E=mc2 IS F=ma. The middle distance in/of/AS SPACE AND the full distance in/of/AS SPACE are NECESSARILY linked AND balanced. MAGNIFICENT !!!!!!!!!! INSTANTANEITY IS thus FUNDAMENTAL to what is the FULL and proper UNDERSTANDING of physics/physical experience, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. It is ALL CLEARLY proven. Again, the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. GREAT. Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. It is all CLEARLY proven !!!!!!!! TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. GREAT !!!!!!!! BALANCE and completeness go hand in hand. By Frank DiMeglio
After all this time, and the numerous times I've heard about the necessary thrust required to lift the different space mission into orbit around the earth, if finally occurs to me something is wrong with that configuration; how is it that commercial airplanes don't require that kind of thrust in order to fly through the air? Aren't they "defying" gravity as well?
Airplane wings use lifting force along a horizontal plane through the force of jet engines. They also don't fly nearly as high as rockets need to go out of space. Airplanes fly roughly 30 Miles from the surface whereas rockets must fly up vertically 60 Miles Up to escape earths gravity
While there are cures for a variety of cancers, there will never be immunity. Body cells going rogue is what cancer is. Immunity against yourself isn't possible, so cancers will always be with us.
@@kasegiyabu5030 immunity against yourself IS possible. That's why your immune system doesn't normally attack your own body. IF that happens with a cancer then your immune system can be told again to stop attacking its own body
Science is not a collection of facts, it is a method of study consisting largely of... "a smidgen of fact intermixed with a lot of theories and suppositions..."
@Chris Townsend ... pulled out of an ass somewhere ? so that means donkeys are smarter than you'll ever be... sounds like you're the one in dire need of an enema, since you're obviously long past the stage where a strong laxative or suppository would do you any good
They're explaining theories. When you have theories, they will quite often contradict each other. Much of what people think of as fact, for instance the dinosaur-killing asteroid, is still just the prevailing theory.
Raindrops, soap bubbles, balloons are flat, because it's the most efficient shape in the universe - The Pancake Shape. Ancient Earth Pancake Shape Theorists say.... YES!
Surah Al-Qiyama (75), Verse 5 - 12: بَلْ يُرِيدُ الْإِنسَانُ لِيَفْجُرَ أَمَامَهُ Nay! (Man denies Resurrection and Reckoning. So) he desires to continue committing sins. يَسْأَلُ أَيَّانَ يَوْمُ الْقِيَامَةِ He asks: "When will be this Day of Resurrection?" فَإِذَا بَرِقَ الْبَصَرُ So, when the sight shall be dazed, وَخَسَفَ الْقَمَرُ And the moon will be eclipsed, وَجُمِعَ الشَّمْسُ وَالْقَمَرُ And the sun and moon will be joined together (by going one into the other or folded up or deprived of their light, etc.) يَقُولُ الْإِنسَانُ يَوْمَئِذٍ أَيْنَ الْمَفَرُّ On that Day man will say: "Where (is the refuge) to flee?" كَلَّا لَا وَزَرَ No! There is no refuge! إِلَىٰ رَبِّكَ يَوْمَئِذٍ الْمُسْتَقَرُّ Unto your Lord (Alone) will be the place of rest that Day.
yup. Heavy core sank down and merged with earth core. This collision explains not only moon existence, but also strangely high average density of Earth. It is lucky that Earth core is that big- it makes strong electromagnetic shield, and it cools down much slower than small one would.
This is only theory...no one knows how the moon was formed.!! Just like evolution theory. Proven? Yet can't be replicated even with money, laboratories, human direction, and intelligent design. Show me real scientific proof please.
HarryKari Touche Gravity is a theory, do you wanna challenge that too? We see evolution in dogs, also. Fuck sakes man just think about what you're saying, we gain knowledge as time goes on and you deny it because something thousands of years old contradicts it. Grow up.
I haven't actually watched the doc yet, but theory goes that we were hit by thea, which obliterated that planet and almost ours. it turned earth into a super heated mass of molten rock and the earth's gravity kept the debris of the thea close, it clumped together solidified and becacme the moon. We know this because the moon contains rock which came from the earths mantel, and also the computer models used to test it showed exactly this, first time. It's a pretty solid theory
When people say something like, this moon is the biggest in universe. Do we already explored the entire universe the stuff so big were not even shure if it is infinite. So we already knows all the moons in universe to say something like that. We?? Humans?? The ones who are not even sure about our own planet?? Neither our own mind?! OK...
That means you have facts no other possess ... Liar ! You've found nothing it's a theory you thought of once please copy and paste 1% of your math at least so we can look over it . Smh pretending to be sciencist or some shit go cosplay elsewhere
I think full moon making animals more active makes sense. More light during what would usually be dark is sure to trigger some day/night cycle. Humans are naturally more sleep during dark so I would expect people being more active as well.
All lies they didn't go to the Moon NASA admitted it when asked how we get through the Van Allen . Said "Well it's a problem"! But the 9/11 lie killed 4,000. The US Gover ment needs a good impeachment, like Hillary Clinton ,looks sweet 16.
@@Navigator001 The Van Allen belt is radiation pr.otecting the planet from debris. The bullshit moon projectile is made metal. The metal converts into X-rays zapping all humans. Mind you if they made one from recyclable plastic, then you're through like a bat from hell. The Greenie weenies will have a plan.after all big G made the world, neo Liberalism is part of Big G's plan in economics,self evident that the Bourgeoisie led by Trumpie Pumpie and the Republicans and their running dogs the Democratic Party showing Trumpy to as a Russian spy. They are truly blessed by big G. Straight to that Tax free Heaven in the sky, Hillary is impeached already by wondefull morticians, in her pre death beauty treatment. Which will catch on like nuclear war. Pre -emting Global Warming
A couple of examples of full moons doesn't make the link between full moon and earthquake true. Japan 2011 9.0 - Not full Moon Chile 2010 8.8 - Not full Moon Darfield 2010 7.1 - Not full Moon Nepal 2015 7.8 - Not full Moon Chile 2015 8.3 - Not full Moon Chile 1960 9.5 - Not full Moon Alaska 1964 9.2 - Not full Moon Sumatra 2004 9.1 - Full Moon Kamchatka 2004 9.0 - Not full Moon Ecuador 1906 8.8 - Not full Moon Alaska 1965 8.7 - Not full Moon Sumatra 2012 8.6 - Not full Moon Tibet 1950 8.6 - Not full Moon Sumatra 2012 8.6 - Not full Moon Alaska 1957 8.6 - Not full Moon Sumatra 2007 8.5 - Not full Moon Indonesia 1938 8.5 - Not full Moon Kuril Islands 1963 8.5 - Not full Moon
+Laurence Hill it was not that simple, the moon was more like a trigger, if the place was unstable and the moon passes by plus add the alignment of the sun, it could add more stress releasing that earthquake, it's more like the moon makes the quake trigger earlier than it's supposed to, those quakes you've listed got beyond the line of breaking point so they triggered
+Neil Janviere Rovillos I can't believe people are so naive that they think that the moon which by the way has less gravitational pull on it than the sun can trigger earthquakes the crustal stresses required for this to happen are far larger than what a body as small as the moon can generate!
like, I said, it was a trigger and it's more like winning a lottery because if the sun couldn't trigger it by itself then it needs added stress right, It just need to be at the right place at the right time
"SaTuRn HaS tHe MoSt, WiTh 46."
Apparently, Jupiter is in 2nd with over 60 moons.
I also thought Saturn had more like 60 as well?
Yeah, they are always finding more moons around the gas giants.
saturn now has 82 confirmed moons.
Jupiter has 4 I thought? No?
Hail Saturn
I like the moon. Its not bad, as far as moons go.
zod dammit it's a perfect moon
Huh!? Are you an arts and entertainment person?
Alien What?
Soon we will be visiting other moons, particularly the icy moons of the fifth and sixth planets, which might even have life forms below their crusts. The minor planet between the fourth (Mars) and fifth (Jupiter) planets, Ceres, has ice in its craters, and the minor planet Pluto, like Earth, is sort of a double-planet, in that its moon Charon is proportionately large (the Earth and Moon orbit a point just inside the Earth's surface, but Pluto and Charon have a mid-point closer to Pluto around which they both orbit in gravitational balance).
I've seen better.
And if the cloud bursts, thunder in your ear
You shout and no one seems to hear.
And if the band you're in starts playing different tunes
Well I'll see you on the dark side of the moon.
Cool; now its going thru my mind
"There is no dark side in the moon, really. Matter of fact, it's all dark. The only thing that makes it look light is the sun."
Nice
The moon is all dark the sun gives moon the light.
I'm just curious what the chicoms were doing on the dark side, and don't give me that story about space farming, they can't even farm enough down here to feed themselves, they put a weapon up there which we can't see.
From the Philippines🇵🇭. Good afternoon Sir. I AGREE that the moon has something to do with a human behavior. One remarkable observation is the wife of my son. When the moon began in its FULL MOON JOURNEY AND PROCESS IN THE SKY, SHE ALWAYS CURSE AND CALL BAD NAMES TO MY POOR SON FOR ALMOST 10 YEARS NOW. ACCUSING MY SON HAVING AN ELLICIT AFFAIR. MY SON IS IN THE SEA FOR 8 MONTHS EVERY YEAR MANEUVERING THEIR SHIP AS A SEAMAN. I AM FORCED TO CALL HER LUNATIC BUT ONLY TO MYSELF
THANK YOU SIR. PLEASE BE SAFE ALWAYS. 🙏
Full moon means more light and I think wolves and man do more with more light. Not because it "affects" them, it's just easier to do stuff when you can see better.
bob brooks haha! I never thought of that. Wouldnt it let everything see better then? And humans and wolves would not be the only ones acting different due to better visibility? Like squirrels and bunny's?
bob brooks u know what bob I think sometimes it’s just that simple and everyone just overlooks that! Very well put bob
Its the water in your body.
Spot on Bob!
July 1963. Aboard boat at sundown taking me from Venice, Italy, to the Lido (Venice's swim beach on an Adriatic-Sea barrier island). Terrible wails coming from a large, windowless building that jutted out of the water to our right. I asked my Italian friend what it was. He pointed to the full moon rising and said two words, "Insane asylum." I pursued the point, and found that, though they could not see outside, they could sense the full moon, and it upset them a lot.
Case 2: Ft. Worth, TX, 1975. A 6-ft. hedge in Bob's backyard. Left half neatly trimmed at 6 ft. Right half a wild mess with 9-ft. flier branches sticking out all over. Wild side pruned 4 days after neat side, but on a day that the Farmer's Almanac did not say was good for pruning vegetation. The neat half, though pruned considerably earlier, was pruned on a good day for the task. Why good? Because the moon was right.
I recommend that you doubters buy almanacs and strike blows for empiricism through conducting your own botanical experiments. Or, you can continue to pontificate without a clue. The growing season is about to begin, so let the experiments begin! Come September, I expect to see numerous chats, etc., about how the moon affects EVERTHING. Spread the word. Let's get this show on the road. Germinate peas, beans, etc. against the moon's advice. Get the kids involved. Learn what people who grew up on farms and ranches have known forever. The moon not only "affects" (your quotes,not mine) us, but controls us.
I don't know how you city folk get by without almanacs. Heck, you don't even have a way to determine all the myriad ways that the moon, sun, etc., influence each of us continually, 24-365.
If a large meteor impact creates a cataclysm,
then does a small meteor cause a kittyclysm?
Funny
Very cute!!!!
lol =^.^=
@se7enNo. I say...FUCK ON!
Demos=CONVICTIONS SOON!
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!
@se7en You leftists are the HATERS...
You call all Trump backers racist, when, like the leftists, actually only 5% are racist, thus DIVIDING and inciting serious social unrest which is hurting ALL of the country's good tasks, goals and ideal productivites.
Its interesting stuff, but I hate the presentation--the fast-slo-mo tracking shots, the weak synth-rock and the over-dramatised narration. Just the choice of language is annoying; the 'lunar Cataclysm' as opposed to the more descriptive and scientifically accepted 'Late Heavy Bombardment'. And the basaltic up-welling origin of the lunar seas they discuss here has been discredited for more than twenty years.
morelenmir also the proto earth was not a red hot ball when thea hit it. it even had life on it.
I agree. This kind of presentation seemed to be pretty common in older cable TV documentaries. I'm not sure if it's still common today since I don't watch channels like Discovery or NatGeo anymore. I've grown to prefer more amateur UA-cam presentations far more than these.
Were always wondering about the devastation a meteor could have on our planet and how could we prevent such a catastrophe. But we might want to put that same effort into protecting the moon from a similar impact.
This is the prediction in the bible. That something will hit our MOON & knock it out of its orbit....causing the oceans to sway like a drunkard. It eventually ends life on earth but not immediately as it would if earth was hit....giving the last humans time to repent & ask God to forgive them.
@@nickisnyder3450 Forgive them for *_WHAT?_* Forgive them for the effects of a lunar impactor that GOD supposedly created? This makes no logical sense.
@@nickisnyder3450 behave yourself. No need for fiction and bible nonsense dude.
@@nialldargan4929 behave yourself. No need for fiction and bible nonsense dude. -🤓
@@nialldargan4929 THE PRECISE, SIMPLE, TOP DOWN, AND CLEAR DERIVATION, ORIGIN, MEANING, AND CONSTRUCTION OF E=MC2:
E=mc2 is taken directly from F=ma. BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is fundamental. Carefully consider what is THE SUN AND what is the speed of light (c) ON BALANCE. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the NIGHT SKY. So, consider what is THE BLACK “space” of what is THE EYE. The sky is blue, AND what is THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE !! c squared is CLEARLY understood as a dimension (of what constitutes SPACE) ON BALANCE, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity ON/IN BALANCE !!! GREAT !!! I have CLEARLY explained or proven the mathematical unification of gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy (ON/IN BALANCE), as I have demonstrated the fourth dimension AND the term c4 from Einstein's field equations (along with TIME); as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). I have proven how and why this is mathematically consistent with F=ma AND E=mc2. TIME dilation ultimately proves on balance that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). In light of what has been CLEARLY proven here (on BALANCE), think about what is THE SUN in DIRECT comparison to/with what is outer “space”. GREAT !!! It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense, as BALANCE and completeness go hand in hand.
I'm going to more precisely explain the true origin (and the full meaning) of the equation E=mc2. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is (CLEARLY and necessarily) proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). This also CLEARLY explains, on balance, why and how this equation represents a two dimensional surface OR SPACE as what is a BALANCED AVERAGE. Indeed, gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are (CLEARLY) linked AND BALANCED opposites (on balance); as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity (on/in balance) !!! Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE.
TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. Indeed, TIME is necessarily possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity (on/in balance).
Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE on balance, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity ON/IN BALANCE. This explains F=ma AND E=mc2. This ALSO explains why the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution. Inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). This explains F=ma AND E=mc2. I have truly (and fundamentally) revolutionized what is our understanding of physics/physical experience.
Compare the setting and orange Sun with the fully illuminated and setting/WHITE Moon DIRECTLY. They do basically appear to give off the same illumination, in fact. Notice that the curvature or shape of said Moon matches that of THE EARTH/ground (given a clear horizon, that is). What is THE SUN AND what is THE MOON are then the SAME SIZE in the sky as what is THE EYE. Moreover, these two forms manifest (or form up) at what is EYE LEVEL/body height. GREAT !!! Now, I have CLEARLY proven why AND how this is so. The tides are (CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY) ELECTROMAGNETIC/gravitational ON BALANCE. Magnificent !!! The tides are CLEARLY and necessarily subject to F=ma AND E=mc2, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Again, the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky; and the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution. The sky is blue, and THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE. Excellent. I have explained why the sizes of said Moon and said Sun are the same as what is THE EYE ON BALANCE. So, I have CLEARLY explained why the diameter of the Moon is about one quarter (at 27 percent) in size compared with what is THE EARTH.
How does what is the Sun survive or exist against what is outer “space" ? The answer is, ON BALANCE, invisible AND VISIBLE SPACE in fundamental equilibrium and BALANCE. Here's why. (Think about TIME as well.)
WHAT IS THE EXPLANATION OF SPACE AND TIME ON BALANCE:
Invisible AND VISIBLE SPACE in fundamental equilibrium AND BALANCE. This necessarily and clearly involves interaction, on balance. Consider what is the eye (on balance). Logically consider what is a two dimensional surface OR SPACE ON BALANCE !!!! Notice the associated DOME AND the flat/black “space” of WHAT IS the eye AS WELL. Really think about it all. Consider WHAT IS THE SUN ON BALANCE. (NOW, think about time.) Outer “space” involves full inertia, AND it is fully invisible AND black. Consider one and three dimensions ON BALANCE !!! Now, consider what is the fourth dimension and the term c4 from Einstein's field equations. Think about ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy AND think about gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Consider what is the man (AND THE EYE ON BALANCE) who IS actually standing ON what is THE EARTH/ground (ON BALANCE) !! Think about TIME !! Think about why there is something instead of nothing ON BALANCE. Consider that time is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE. Think about the man (THE EYE) that actually IS IN what is outer “space”. Think about time. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE, and consider what is the speed of light (c) ON BALANCE. NOW, consider what is THE SUN. Think closely about everything in this writing. Balance and completeness go hand in hand. Magnificent. ❤️
c squared CLEARLY means an INTERACTION on balance, as the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Balanced inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is fundamental. Consider E and “m" on balance. Great. The fourth dimension is only consistent with what is (on balance) a TWO dimensional surface OR SPACE ON BALANCE. Consider what is the eye. Consider what is the balanced MIDDLE DISTANCE in/of SPACE (ON/IN BALANCE). Consider invisible AND VISIBLE SPACE in fundamental equilibrium AND BALANCE. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE. So, consider what is the speed of light (c) ON BALANCE. This CLEARLY explains the fourth dimension AND the term c4 from Einstein's field equations.
Time is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE, as BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is fundamental pursuant to F=ma AND E=mc2 in balance. A galaxy consists of invisible AND VISIBLE SPACE in fundamental equilibrium and BALANCE, thereby eliminating the need for any "dark" "matter" or "dark" "energy"; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is then CLEARLY gravity ON/in BALANCE.
By Frank DiMeglio
9:21 "When the moon...."
Me: "HITS YOUR EYE LIKE A BIG PIZZA PIE, THAT'S AMORE"
Okay, back to learning.
When you're swimming in the sea, and something bites your knee...that's a moray
10/10 response
When the moon hits your eye
Like a big pizza pie
That's amore
When an eel lunges out
And takes a bite of your snout
That's amoreeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
" That's amore eel " That's my version anyway.
Hahaha
I have always felt the moon effected earthquakes....but this is the first time Ive heard a scientist agree....the internet is an amazing thing!
*affected. Affect is the verb. Effect is the noun. If you forget, think of “special effects.” They are things, so they are nouns, not verbs. If you don’t know the difference between a verb and a noun, it frightens me that you are a nurse.
Science told me I would only need one shot for covid
Hang on 2
Wooo you need 3
We think you be fully covered if you have your 2 shots plus 2 boosters to give your immune system maximum defence
Oh I'm Pfizer booster shots seem to be ineffective within weeks
Yeah science
Rock solid 👍
Quakes on Luna would be called moonquakes
Get a life @@cruisepaige
Antarctica can't be transformed into a fast desert. It already is a vast desert.
Eric Taylor true
Eric Taylor yup a vast desert of ice
If only people would pronounce it correctly!
True. When people think of deserts, they think of sand not ice or snow. But the definition does include places like Antarctica.
Eric they mean "hot" desert...... Not the frozen desert it is now....
When discussing temperature please say which units you are using.
Yeah.
And they need to time stamp this type of content more, it'll be on the interwebs forever.
"Without the moon....Antarctica could become a vast desert..." Um...it already IS a vast desert by definition!
About to say the same
perhaps it is in a way , but currently a desert of ice . What he probably meant is an actual desert with scorching heat like Sahara
@@georgeisaak5321 look up definition of desert, no wait first look up the meaning of definition :p
Was about to comment but the basics seem to be covered here
@@georgeisaak5321 Not "in a way" it is..
Isn't it weird that our moon has no name? we just call it moon. Other planets moons has name. Why don't we have for ours?
Because mooning would make no sense otherwise.
Luna
Rocky?
Its name is Luna
Alpha
Excellent. A special effect showing the gigantic tides would have been awesome (and scary).
grow up
I cannot believe the Risks to those astronauts by driving about at 15 or 20 miles per hour on a golf cart . It doesn’t make any sense whatsoever. To go all that way then have to drive a few miles more - racing across rocky terrain with perhaps rocks or holes capable of tipping the thing over. It’s unbelievable how they got away with it . 😮
I can't think of any good reason, We should rather consecrate on all the asteroids around us!! They threaten our very existence!!
I wish there was some discussion on why the far side of the moon has a thicker crust. Does the computer model about the accretion theory explain this. Are there as many impact craters on the far side as on the near side?
i' ve seen a theory while watching an university stream about the moon, that it might be because the accreation disc actually formed 2 moons first with very similar velocity, but the one in the "behind" was a bit faster, but not enough to crash, instead it merged... so the far side is thicker because is one ball "splated" on the back of the other one... sorry for my english,hope it make sence... :)
to answer your other question, yes,there is many of impact crater on the far side,but no seas, because is thicker,so it would not cause the magma to resurface
i learned some really interesting facts from this documentary. i knew the moon had effects on the earth but never to that extent!!. Really interesting stuff.
Just watch the tide and flood. It's been going on for a long, long time.
@@mattematsson554 WHY E=MC2 IS NECESSARILY F=MA (ON BALANCE), AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity AS SPACE ON BALANCE:
TIME DILATION ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that E=MC2 IS F=ma, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Hence, the Earth AND the Sun are CLEARLY E=MC2 AND F=ma IN BALANCE. (The sky is blue, AND the Earth is ALSO BLUE.) A PHOTON may be placed at the center of WHAT IS THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the speed of light (c); AS E=MC2 IS F=MA !!!; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. BALANCE and completeness go hand in hand. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ("Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !!!) Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=mC2 IS F=ma IN BALANCE !!!; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. (Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE.) E=mC2 IS F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Great !!! Again, BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense.
By Frank DiMeglio
Without the moon, Michael Jackson wouldn't be able to come up with his famous "walk".
Yeah the “Uranus walk” just isn’t the same.
Lol ...that's a very valid point.
Did the moon make him f little boys aswel ?
Good point..😜
What does the moon have to do with Michael Jacksons Perp Walk.
I jest. I'm a big fan of Michaels, I think he had issues, but I think he was misunderstood. I believe it stemmed from an abusive childhood.
Nothing started with a bang.
Realisation that an explosion happened from a distance starts with you hearing a bang
Bit of a factual error.... 3:34 "Between 1969 and 1972 six missions blasted off to the moon. Only 12 humans have ever walked on the moon." Not entirely correct. Apollo 13 blasted off for the moon. It even got there but didn't land. Apollo 10 also got to the moon and orbited but didn't set down. Apollos 11, 12, 14, 15, 16 and 17 did land and those carried the 12 astronauts lucky enough to walk on the moon.
Stephen Knapp Blah blah blah. You’re ruining my fictional show
apollo 8 also circled the moon. famously.
We`ve never been to the moon, it was hoaxed.we`ve never been out of earths orbit..
John Davies ...proofs please gentleman, that you say not, do not mean anything, it is completely irrelevant, if you want people to believe on you, stop spitting word with not value and present proofs.
tony brito how about the van allen belts
Anyone else love getting high and watching space and dinosaur documentaries?😉💚
paige carpenter yes
Yes but only within your own imimnag
The U.K.
🤣. Yes
@Sub or you are against Trump in 2020 If you let weed fuck up your life your week I agree if your week dont smoke Now drugs are a whole different story Drugs will ruin anybody one way or the other Drugs are bad UMKAY
Me minus the high part!
Dude, I was watching something else and fell asleep, and then youtube put that on, and i started to have the most awesome dreams about me on a spacecraft ahahahah
The moon is moving away from us.....I don't blame it!!
Come back moon
If you reversed it's direction by doing the math backward...have the moon getting closer instead of further away...would disprove the earths millions of years old theories.
Drrrr Drrrrr Drrrrr (something stupid)
Drrrr Drrrrr Drrrrr
From you* probably
@@arcanegulo5441 haha right on !!!!
It is full moon tonight. I feel like robbing the liquor store 🤣
I wish there weren't any ads, so I could put this on and try falling asleep. 🌚
Ads block, get it.
Cant wait to see what I dream about tonight listening to this while sleeping.
Yep pretty much
Pll
I think all things should be researched.
"The moon is always mooning you because it's very cheeky."
---Albert Einstein
A lot of this just sounds like unprovable theory... yet its stated like someone was sitting there observing it happen.
Thats exactly what i said...this guy talks like he. Watched it happen
Travid, I agree, It's just a hood- wanking video on unproven theory, and another dead end, just like this one >> The Relationship Between The Earth, Moon And The Sun [Amazing Documentary].
@@robbiewright4414 Totally agree. Scientists today speak of historical science as if it were just provable science. Yet historical science can't even pass the scientific method to actually prove it's a fact! It's as if the scientific method is no longer needed to become a scientist. Actually it is no longer needed. There are biologists that only deal with organisms they can't see. Then they actually fill in gaps with ridiculous "links" with animals they just make up like it's no big deal. Give us some respect. I have no problem wondering how things began...it's who we are...just don't try and tell the world your way of thinking is the only way. I'd be better to be honest so you can show everyone all the different ways people think it happened and why.
Not even that, it's an hypothesis.
Absolutely right on Travis.
This had much more interesting and unexpected information than I thought it would. Well done!
I can't believe there are ppl out there who do t believe ppl landed on the moon an flat earth dummies..
Unfortunately it’s not true. Scientists know now that the rock that makes up the moon is older than our entire solar system. The moon is actually older than our sun.
I wonder how old this documentary is, because this is a very outdated theory?? I wonder if they are still teaching this in schools??
Correction: Americans start to believe the link between werewolf and the moon is true. Interbreeding does that to a society.
Mind you, I too was a teenage werewolf, but I'm alright nooooooooowwww!
Earth: THIS is gonna hurt!
Moon: I got this.........
Earth: Thanks bro, I owe ya.
stupid comment
I can't see the 'Man in the Moon'. Somebody must have a wild imagination.
I think that a lot of imagination has planted fear in our minds over the centuries! Just like Corona, Climate, NWO and Agenda2030 (created by Rockefeller 1992) does today.
Wow, I thought I was the only one who couldn't (and still can't) see the Man in the Moon! As a kid I thought my friends were pulling my leg when they said they saw him lol
Just like all the people that think a full moon actually changes human behavior. If a full moon changes human behavior it's because they are emotional and psychological state and/or belief system allows that to happen. Cuz the moon's always there. There's a common misconception that it's biggest when it's full. A full moon is just light hitting one side of it illuminating it for us to see. There's times when the new moon is there.. when it's completely dark and it's just as close but no one says anything about that. Changes in human behavior due to any gravitational effect of the moon has not been proven. And furthermore... For those that are reading that seem to think I'm wrong... If the moon had the power to shift the liquids in your body... It would have a physical effect on you before it had any kind of emotional or psychological effect. And if the moon pulled the liquids in your body to one side of you I would imagine you would swell and it would be very uncomfortable. Please someone if you can correct me with scientific evidence then I will stand corrected. But Hollywood and a lot of really ridiculous movies and written stories from generations past have had way too much of an influence on the intelligence level of modern society. If you're reading this that means you have access to the internet and you're more than likely using a smart device. Use it to learn something.😂😂
I've never seen it either. I see the rabbit in pics though
36:06 there is a clip of a radio transmission with a female voice played. It was also used in the ending credits of COPS and in the game City of Heroes when you pass a police drone.
It's always been common knowledge to me that more people are out during a full moon because they can see without a flashlight for one ,and if you're doing something wrong other people can see them also.
God sure went the long route for us humans
For my space friends out there that can help me. Can a sine wave ride the earth’s magnetic wave through space? Can 3 phases positively charged rods create a synthetic “DC” wave, can a negatively charged 3 phase rods collect the sine wave produced by the positively charged rods. Would you need “4 phases” the 4th phase being the center ground to help collect the positively charged rods. Would you need 3 phases in sync or 3 phases in their own phase to produce proper power to transmit the perfect voltage through air? If you capped the signal and added more "emitting" rods to the side of the emitter could you direct that power to multiple "collectors"? (1 power point to multiple collectors.) Could the collectors reach out a grab 2 phases to help switch between the collectors? Can electricity ride a magnetic wave? Can you send a sine wave from the southern hemisphere to northern hemisphere? Could you send an electron from earth to moon? Can you control shooting electricity in space since there is no ground in space? would the electricity grab on to the minerals in space? Could a space craft be negatively charged and be propelled by the protons presented by the sun in the solar wind (Like magnetic theory)? Also how far out does the solar wind reach. If solar wind is only great at near the closet planets, can we "ride" that wind for the faster means of travel. If you used laser acceleration to push a craft through space would you have enough energy from earth to propel it? would you need satellites to help push? Can a laser pulse from 1 satellite charge up another satellite? If so, could you "Daisey chain" or line of sight the satellites to help charge one other.
No.
Something major happened in the history of the solar system to cause all this damage we see the results of today . Pluto has an extreme elliptical orbit around the sun, Uranus is tipped on its side , and Mars was hit with a huge impact that caused a big bulge on one side of the planet .The result was a massive volcanic system with the biggest volcano (Olympus Mons) which is three times higher than Mt. Everest and the size of Texas as well as the biggest canyon in the entire solar system Valles Merineris at 2500 miles , long and 23,000 ft deep . Mars also has an elliptical orbit more extreme than any other planet aside from Pluto .
And then there's Venus which has a day that's longer than its year and its spinning backwards counter to all the other planets . Additionally the entire surface was refaced at some point in its past which most likely was the cause for the loss of all its water . The same could be said for Mars as well .
In the case of Venus its rotation is slowing down and will eventually be reversed back to the way other planets rotate .
Obviously something major happened in our solar system to cause these things . It possible that a rogue planet came through the system and wreaked havoc as it passed through.
Aside from the cometary debris that our planet passes through every year there are thousands of asteroids that are within the inner solar system which could tell us a lot more about the history of the early solar system and what has happened .
Given the orbits of several Kuiper belt objects, i.e. objects such as comets that reside beyond the orbit of Pluto, many astronomers are now pretty certain that a planet of at least the size of Earth but possibly much bigger than Earth is lurking beyond the outer bounds of the solar system and could be in an extreme long elliptical orbit around the sun .
Other scientist have also postulated the possibility of a brown dwarf otherwise known as a failed star which is essentially a gas giant bigger than Jupiter in an extremely long orbit around our star which would make sense since most stars have a companion star traveling with them from birth . A brown dwarf would be too dim to be seen but could be detected via a new highly sensitive infrared space telescope .
Hopefully once the James Webb space telescope is up and running and operating smoothly we'll have an answer to some of these important questions .
Even if we don't find a companion star or a big planet roaming around the edges of the solar system there's still countless rogue worlds within our galaxy that could have been the cause for the destruction we see in our now stable system . The big question is for how long will this stability last until the next time ?
"Obviously something major happened in our solar system to cause these things." Yeah, it was called the violent birth of the solar system. Natural forces. Your comment is a whole bunch of nothing disguised as actual perspicacity.
@@prometheusunbound7628 "many astronomers are now pretty certain..." - and which astronomers are those exactly?
If another star is circling around the solar system, then we would see that in movements of the planets and the Sun, in much the same way as Neptune was discovered. As we have seen no irregularities that have not been explained, it is extremely unlikely that another star is close by.
Cant it be several events? What about t theory now of a earlier or younger solar system with more planets? That eventually hit each others and what we see now is the results of it?
Cant it be several events? What about t theory now of a earlier or younger solar system with more planets? That eventually hit each others and what we see now is the results of it?
Sure there is some connection between Earth, Moon and the Sun affecting each other's magnetic fields! They all stay there, in space, hung on their own so imagine the strength of that field in each and every case of a planet!
2:39 Silhouette of your gigantic member.
Keep up the great work. 👍🏼
I have really been taught much about the moon. Thank you so much.
get true information from china they went to the moon recently..before they lose moon data like incompetent NASA
We love Luna, we are the lunies. 😀
I love Luna! She is my fav Harry potter character
Ain't that the truth 💯
Lunatics.
Saturn does not have the most moons in our solar system Jupiter does with 63. How can a documentary get something so simple wrong?. Makes me doubt the rest of the information.
I didn't even notice it but you're absolutely right.
Matt Irving it has 70
Matt Irving sorry it has 79 my bad
You can doubt as much as you want, but the thing with Jupiter is that, between 2015 and 2018, 14 moons were discovered, bringing their number to 79. And who knows when was this documentary made - it was posted in 2016. And, on the other hand, Saturn lost 62 of his moons so far (moons that were discovered but have since disappeared). Both of them are HUGE and the number of moons (most of them being actually captured asteroids and other junk) changes constantly, year to year.
Big ones don't, but dozens of smaller ones come and go.
So when you say "makes me doubt the rest of the information" and "how can documentary get something so simple wrong" actually points to the fact that you yourself are ignorant on the subject.
And yes, depending on the time when this specific documentary was made, Saturn could have had more satellites than Jupiter and the number could have been wrong. For instance, just a month ago, number of Jupiter's moons jumped by 10, growing to current 79. Saturn, currently, 62. A month ago it was 69:62. And up to September 7th 2010 it was 63:62 for Jupiter.
Александар Матић OO
l,o1p
It's always been common knowledge to me that more people are out during a full moon because they can see without a flashlight for one ,and if you're doing something wrong other people can see them also.
Well unless you live somewhere with street lights then this theory doesn’t hold up
It always has, Michael?
So before you knew this knowledge, what then?
@@davidross5593 I guess you have to believe in a universal knowledge. And humans have to translate this knowledge from the subconscious to the conscious with a verbal language in order to also convey it to other people.
Thank you for teaching me something new.
M-o-o-n ... That spells : moon !!
Laws yes!! LMAO
From Stephen King's The Stand? NICE
read that book
T.o.m. spells moon. Laws yes. Good memories.
Well that's mildly retarded.
Take a shot every time he says "moon"
fuck alcohol. Diminishing returns.
***** very true.
***** this is coming from someone who had an alcohol withdrawal seizure.
+Max M a shot of milk
Matt Brown I am lactose intolerant. Can have dairy in small amounts in food.
Very interesting, to say the least. Thank you for the video upload.
3:38 people who like to say we have never been to the moon point to the flag flying when there is suppose to be no wind so that's proof we haven't been there but i don't see the flag flying. It's only moving because it is being moved.
Antarctica already IS a vast desert, using the scientific definition of desert.
Definition of desert (from Oxford Lexico): "A dry, barren area of land, especially one covered with sand, that is characteristically desolate, waterless, and without vegetation."
I would not call Antarctica dry or waterless. So calling it a desert is a bit of a stretch.
Rene Dekker science doesn’t care about your opinion
@@renedekker9806 Antarctica is very dry and waterless. All of its freshwater is in ice, so very dry. Barely any water in the air, you can see for miles and miles. Almost never rains.
@@ericmiao2792 Let's just agree to disagree.
my car has done enough miles to reach the moon and start making its way back to earth :o
Approx 245,000 miles on the odometer? Spunky car!
My F-150 is getting close! 664 miles to go! I have the distance of 238900 miles as a target, as the average distance...
This is kind of exciting! I'm going to get a picture when it happens... add it to my maintenance records as a milestone!
Ive made the roudn trip almost 2wice ... 800,000 miles 92 caprice
@@SteffanoDucati cool! Keep it rolling!
The more we research, the more we'll find just how true God's word has been on everything including creation. Blessed are those who believe without seeing.
Ranjit Tyagi Huh? Come on now, you’re letting yourself down. I know your reasoning capacity surely can do better than that 😂
Ranjit Tyagi Huh? Come on now, you’re letting yourself down. I know your reasoning capacity surely can do better than that 😂
Blessed are those who open their eyes and see the true causes, for they unite the whole universe in glorious beauty. Blessed are those who believe in truth, for they will never be led astray.
Rene Dekker The truth of men is feeble, subjective and inconstant as we all know. But God’s word is the one and only truth, the life and the way. The only truth that has the ability to forgive every magnitude of sin, give you true peace, joy, and happiness. If only you believe in it with your heart.
@@The_Truth777 The truth of men is feeble, subjective and inconstant as we all know. God's physics laws are the one and only truth, the life and the way. The only truth that has the ability to give you true peace, joy, and happiness. If only you believe in it with your heart and mind together.
1:10 - temperatures ranging from 250 degrees to minus 380 degrees ? of what,? F or C?
This programme was aimed at Americans, so it's F.
As for Berklund's predictions, he's just added one constant for the prediction of earthquakes, one known influencing factor that affects the Earths tectonic plates, especially when amplified by the Moons gravitational pull. Common sense dictates that the normal gravitational pull of the Sun would significantly increase the likelihood of slippage in concert with the Moon. Congratulations are in order, not derision.
Scientists & Discovery Can Cost Some Price$$$ -in * RECOGNITION ** - to these STUDIOS People & Programs , However,
Governmental Bodies don’t Always Assist - Even* Pre- Warnings tv& broader Media. Once damage HAS OCCURRED, Cleanup costs are FAR GREATER in Lives & repairs if any ? COMMONSENSE SHOULD PREVAIL OVER MONETARY INTERESTS - you can’t buy back a dead loved one!!
Oh please. Don't get me started on the moon but i'ts the 2nd largest moon in the universe and its almost perfectly round? It just formed like that eh?
One of only two moons two orbit their planet opposite directions. Why?
Why is the dirt older than the Earth's. Why are we listening to a guy who can't even brush his teeth?
why aren't we "allowed" to go on the other side of the moon?
Why do Soviet efforts get blown out of the sky?
Also it's enVELoped not ENveloped, dork. @19:41
hahaha....good one !!!
"Some scientists believe" how often did i hear that in this "documentary". What really is interresting is evidence, theories, you know scientific stuff.
Source for lunar samples having similar composition to earth’s mantle: www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0019103514004175?via%3Dihub
@@bertgoat8183 curse you and your lies, the earth and moon where created 6,000 years ago by the tooth fairy
I really dislike this kind of journalism. It's like a fancy show for kids. They just boldly claim a lot of things with no real evidence. Sadly, that's just what modern physics, and in particular astronomy, has turned into... People should really scrutinize their claims way more. You've heard the saying "don't believe everything you hear", and that also applies to what the "scientists" claim to "know" about the universe. The fact is that there are a *lot* of things that we _don't_ know. Modern astronomy is basically just a lot of speculation presented as fact. We don't even know what the inside of the earth is made up of, even less the sun and the moon. Nobody's ever dug deep enough to say what's beneath the earth's crust, which makes up a very small fraction of the earth's radius. Nobody can claim to know exactly what is going on inside the earth. It's just speculation all of it. What is gravity? What is magnetism? What is energy? You may call some of it educated guessing but that's the extent of it. The fact remains: *We don't know!* And you can't work on the premise of, "true until proven wrong", or "it's the best answer we have now so we call it fact".
That's what I hate about scientific journalism like this, that they arrogantly act like they *know* things they couldn't possibly know!
That's not science! That's the _obstruction_ of science! Their bold and baseless claims are getting in the way of _actual_ scientific progress on these subjects!
I wish they kept to just presenting the actual facts and spared us their arbitrary conclusions.
They have an attitude like: "We're the authority on science - we know best! This is how it is and if you don't believe us you're too stupid to understand science!".
If you ask me, scientific progress stopped in the late 19th century, when the world of electrical invention, science and research, spearheaded by the likes of Tesla and Steinmetz, was basically shut down, swept up and replaced with something that was *100% theoretical* and has been ever since. You can't call it fact if it's purely theoretical! You need to prove things in the _real_ world before you can claim something to be "real". General relativity, special relativity, quantum physics, particle physics - it's all 100% theoretical! They have no anchoring to the real world! And the worst part is that they contradict each other!
The following conclusion is simple and pure logic: *Two statements that contradict each other cannot both be true. Either one of them is false, or both of them are.* ~ Me.
This principle seems to be missing in modern physics. In my opinion, we need to go back to square one with physics, because what we have now is not holding up; It's a house of cards, it's a hollow shell, it's a facade and it's an insult to the genuine efforts of honest scientists everywhere and from every era.
The current scientific community needs to take a step back, admit that they _don't know_ a lot of what they're claiming, and allow and encourage an open debate over these things. As it stands right now, any scientist presenting a hypothesis that, no matter how strongly supported by reliable evidence, goes against the _"general consensus"_ is either completely ignored, accused of using unreliable or falsified evidence material, or openly ridiculed in the scientific journals. Would you call this "fair play"? I'd like to call it ostracizing, bullying and intellectual tyranny. Like I said, they're _obstructing_ any real scientific progress.
"Imagine a world ravaged by hurricane force winds, with temperatures swinging from scorching heat to freezing cold. Imagine the day lasting just six hours in a world where only primitive lifeforms evolved…"
Welcome to Arkansas in the fall. It's not that bad...only mostly.
Z
You got 6 hour days over there? Lucky SOBs, ours last 4 during winter :) upside : we don't have hurricanes.
@@ruma9687 But you are in a hurry, every now and then, I guess? That is compensation for those hurry canes.
Oh good lord, this isn't science, it's a fairytale!
Byte Me I know right people will believe anything. Just because someone got a theory on how things happened it doesn’t mean it’s right.. fairy tale is pretty accurate 👍🏻
Actually fairytale is just you lord book!!! This is science...means everything is a 100 % proved to be true,....this is not quantum mechanics theory....!!! Peace!!!
@@titolino73 science is great, this isn't science and you are a child, you will learn
@@titolino73 Sorry: not really. NOTHING can be "proven" by science. That's why gravity is still a "theory". Science can only help us come up with the most probable framework for explaining the data/observations/evidence we've gathered so far. All scientific theories can be made obsolete in an instant, by the reliable discovery of data which they can't explain. That said, the scientific method is our best bet for understanding how the universe works, that we've tried so far!!
@@8800081 At the same time, when it is not 100% proven by science does not automatically mean that it is a fairytale of course. Currently, given all the evidence, scientists are pretty confident that the moon is the remnant of another heavenly body that collided with the earth long ago. That you don't share that assessment is not a reason to belittle other people.
Meantime the moon over here like”bro quit talkin about me like I ain’t in the room”
😭👉👉😭👉👉👉😭👉👉😭😭😭😭👉👉👉👉👉👉👉👉👉👉❤️🙆🏻♂️😭😭😭😭🙆🏻♂️🙆🏻♂️🙆🏻♂️👉😭😭😭😭👉😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭❤️👉❤️👉😭😭😭😭😭😭👉👉👉👉👉👉👉👉👉👉👉👉👉👉👉👉👉👉👉👉👉
🤣🤣🤣... Earthlings got they heads up they butts... The moon matters!
The moon doesn’t have consciousness so what you said is false.
@@dmaximus73 no consciousness you may be able to recognize.... One must admit that the fact that the moon is EXACTLY 400% closer to the Earth than the sun.... the EXACT DISTANCE it would take to offer a series of century old TOTAL ECLIPSES (amongst BILLIONS of years of lunar activity and retreat) feels less like chance and more like providence....
But hey, let's just pretend that the idea that the moon is insignificant in our evolution and a respectful and sentient race!
Great video! Interesting and entertaining!
what i get a kick out of all these commenters trying to force their own opinion on others if you have a different opinion they call you dirty names its like grammar school allover again. bunch of grown educated adults acting like little kids on the playground
Zeb Schreiber I know you are but what am I?
First day on yt is it? ;-)
Facts are not based on some one's uneducated opinion . Facts are based in reality ....
Some of the best science fiction I've seen since Rogue One...
"The Earth, being 50 times bigger than the moon". The Earth is around 4 times bigger than the moon. More science fiction than science fact. Maybe they're trying to get around the fact that no other planet/moon in our solar system has even a close size relationship. They do make it sound plausible though.
scientists believe a collision occured leading to the formation of the moon. now, that's what we call faith!
No, don't confuse your religious faith for scientific knowledge. Look into the makeup of the moon and the type of rocks taken from the moon and you'll see (with scientific evidence) that the moon could only be made by a collision from another body and the earth. But if you choose to be ignorant after reading the facts then piss off.
@@OzFPVflyerPLEASE, BE ASHAME OF YOURSELF! what you believe is a HYPOTHESIS, it is not even a THEORY! LOL🤣 WHAT AN IDIOT!
@@OzFPVflyer HEY, WHERE ARE YOU? DID YOU DO SOME READING ON COLLISION HYPOTHESIS? DO YOU EVEN KNOW THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A HYPOTHESIS AND A THEORY? BEFORE YOU MOCK OTHERS OF THEIR OPINION, BE SURE YOU KNOW WHAT YOURE TALKING OTHERWISE YOULL LOOK LIKE AN IDIOT JUST LIKE NOW. RELIGIOUS PEOPLE HAVE FAITH. WHAT ABOUT YOU? WHAT DO YOU HAVE? IGNORANCE. YOU BELIEVE TO WHAT OTHER PEOPLE THINK SO.
@@JuanCruz-ef5os Fix your grammar and get back to me. Also writing in capital letters shows your lack of internet etiquette. Grow up.
@@OzFPVflyerETIQUETTE? LOOK WHOSE TALKIN? DO YOU KNOW THE WORD RECIPROCATE? I ONLY REACTED TO THE WAY YOU COMMENT IDIOT! CORRECT GRAMMAR? IS THIS AN ENGLISH CLASS? DONT YOU KNOW HOW TO READ BETWEEN THE LINES? YOU WANT TO TEACH AN AMERICAN ENGLISH, EH? BY THE WAY, DID YOU GOOGLE WHAY HYPOTHESIS IS? YOU SHOULD BE ASHAME OF YOURSELF.
hey is true when the moon is out in view it is always one shade of brightnest?
Take a bong hit for everytime he says moon
I.AM
Dhtutifisiesssssjaainns..... Zzzzzzzz.... 🤤🤤🤤😴😴😴🤮
@@DizzyDez613 w09
@@SaiedEshaghi 0
The spark that created life??? Well who created the spark??? God created all things!
What created the god?
I love learning about space
THE ULTIMATE (AND CLEAR) MATHEMATICAL UNIFICATION (AND PROOF) REGARDING PHYSICS/PHYSICAL EXPERIENCE IS NOW DEMONSTRATED, AS E=MC2 IS F=MA: TIME DILATION ultimately proves (ON BALANCE) that E=mc2 IS F=ma, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. (Importantly, balance and completeness go hand in hand.) The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. NOW, A PHOTON may be placed at the center of WHAT IS THE SUN (as A POINT, of course); AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the speed of light (c); AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Indeed, ultimately and truly, TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE; AS E=MC2 IS F=MA; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black. GREAT. Accordingly, INSTANTANEITY is thus FUNDAMENTAL to what is the FULL and proper UNDERSTANDING of physics/PHYSICAL EXPERIENCE; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. E=mc2 IS F=ma. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. E=MC2 IS F=MA. GREAT !!! Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS E=mc2 is F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Consider THE MAN who is standing on what is THE EARTH/GROUND. Touch AND feeling BLEND, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Accordingly, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution. Great. MOREOVER, a given PLANET (including what is THE EARTH) then sweeps out equal areas in equal times consistent WITH/AS F=ma, E=mc2, AND what is perpetual motion; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. INSTANTANEITY is thus FUNDAMENTAL to what is the FULL and proper UNDERSTANDING of physics/physical experience, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. Stellar clustering ALSO proves ON BALANCE that E=mc2 IS F=ma, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Objects (including WHAT IS the falling MAN) fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course), as E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. "Mass"/energy is gravity. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. E=mc2 IS F=ma. THE DOME of a PERSON'S EYE is ALSO VISIBLE. (Notice the flat AND black space of what is THE EYE.) The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. The sky is blue, AND the Earth is blue. THE EARTH/ground AND THE SUN are E=mc2 AND F=ma IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS UNIVERSALLY PROVEN TO BE GRAVITY in what is a mathematically unified fashion. E=mc2 IS F=ma. The middle distance in/of/AS SPACE AND the full distance in/of/AS SPACE are NECESSARILY linked AND balanced. MAGNIFICENT !!!!!!!!!! INSTANTANEITY IS thus FUNDAMENTAL to what is the FULL and proper UNDERSTANDING of physics/physical experience, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. It is ALL CLEARLY proven. Again, the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. GREAT. Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. It is all CLEARLY proven !!!!!!!! TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. GREAT !!!!!!!! BALANCE and completeness go hand in hand. By Frank DiMeglio
After all this time, and the numerous times I've heard about the necessary thrust required to lift the different space mission into orbit around the earth, if finally occurs to me something is wrong with that configuration; how is it that commercial airplanes don't require that kind of thrust in order to fly through the air? Aren't they "defying" gravity as well?
Airplanes do indeed use thrust to defy gravity and fly. That would be what the jet engines are for.
Airplane wings use lifting force along a horizontal plane through the force of jet engines. They also don't fly nearly as high as rockets need to go out of space. Airplanes fly roughly 30 Miles from the surface whereas rockets must fly up vertically 60 Miles Up to escape earths gravity
There's still no cure for cancer, but we know how the moon was formed lol!
I know it is a nonsense
Right
There are cures for cancer. Depends on the cancer and when it’s identified
While there are cures for a variety of cancers, there will never be immunity. Body cells going rogue is what cancer is. Immunity against yourself isn't possible, so cancers will always be with us.
@@kasegiyabu5030 immunity against yourself IS possible. That's why your immune system doesn't normally attack your own body. IF that happens with a cancer then your immune system can be told again to stop attacking its own body
a smidgen of fact intermixed with a lot of theories and suppositions...
Science is not a collection of facts, it is a method of study consisting largely of... "a smidgen of fact intermixed with a lot of theories and suppositions..."
@Chris Townsend ... pulled out of an ass somewhere ? so that means donkeys are smarter than you'll ever be... sounds like you're the one in dire need of an enema, since you're obviously long past the stage where a strong laxative or suppository would do you any good
On another episode they said the moon couldn’t have been formed like this .....wtf
They're explaining theories. When you have theories, they will quite often contradict each other. Much of what people think of as fact, for instance the dinosaur-killing asteroid, is still just the prevailing theory.
Loved it... So much knowledgeable
This is not a habitable place
NASA: hold my beer
If something like that wiped out the dinosaurs there wouldn't be any thing left to find
Um, let me give you a clue; God flooded the earth in Noah's day, and it killed the dinosaurs, good grief!
And the truth will set you free!
@@sherrylovesee2653 fuck shut UP
Another theory is, the moon is a artificial structure.
its most likely a hologram
That's no moon...
And the Earth is flat.......
Raindrops, soap bubbles, balloons are flat, because it's the most efficient shape in the universe - The Pancake Shape.
Ancient Earth Pancake Shape Theorists say.... YES!
lol no: that's NOT a theory... its an idea - and one with no supporting data at that.
Love to watch this video. Unbelievable good.Thanks.
No matter how hard I try, I just can't seem to see the "man" on the Moon
SHORLY ITS PERSON IN THE MOON SOORY WOKE MOON ER LGBTQ MOON
@@mauricehammond2062 Nope: its a man. Get over it, lol.
Its actually just a face - not the whole man.
Eddie T - yep, me too, ain't never seen a 'face', but I have seen that cow jumping over the moon.
KEEP LOOKING PLEASE I BEG YOU
The moon is made of cheese... mice have secretly been funding the space program since the late 1950's
No mouse traps nor mice traps LoL Kitty
A theory as good as the one presented in this documentary ! :)
Mighty Mouse.....
The moons a baloon !
36:45
Is nobody going to comment that the car jumped into a building? I want context and the original video.
the wake up - thanks for that, just took another look, had missed first time round. Amazing!
Surah Al-Qiyama (75), Verse 5 - 12:
بَلْ يُرِيدُ الْإِنسَانُ لِيَفْجُرَ أَمَامَهُ
Nay! (Man denies Resurrection and Reckoning. So) he desires to continue committing sins.
يَسْأَلُ أَيَّانَ يَوْمُ الْقِيَامَةِ
He asks: "When will be this Day of Resurrection?"
فَإِذَا بَرِقَ الْبَصَرُ
So, when the sight shall be dazed,
وَخَسَفَ الْقَمَرُ
And the moon will be eclipsed,
وَجُمِعَ الشَّمْسُ وَالْقَمَرُ
And the sun and moon will be joined together (by going one into the other or folded up or deprived of their light, etc.)
يَقُولُ الْإِنسَانُ يَوْمَئِذٍ أَيْنَ الْمَفَرُّ
On that Day man will say: "Where (is the refuge) to flee?"
كَلَّا لَا وَزَرَ
No! There is no refuge!
إِلَىٰ رَبِّكَ يَوْمَئِذٍ الْمُسْتَقَرُّ
Unto your Lord (Alone) will be the place of rest that Day.
What happened to Theia's core? Does Earth have a core-and-a-half?
yup. Heavy core sank down and merged with earth core. This collision explains not only moon existence, but also strangely high average density of Earth. It is lucky that Earth core is that big- it makes strong electromagnetic shield, and it cools down much slower than small one would.
@@petersvancarek thanks! And it's lucky for us the universe slung that big rock at us.
this is only theory, no one actually knows how the moon was formed
Chuck Adams Consensus on historical sciences are a lot different then one doctor diagnosing individuals, dipshit.
They know NOTHING....
This is only theory...no one knows how the moon was formed.!! Just like evolution theory. Proven? Yet can't be replicated even with money, laboratories, human direction, and intelligent design. Show me real scientific proof please.
HarryKari Touche Gravity is a theory, do you wanna challenge that too? We see evolution in dogs, also. Fuck sakes man just think about what you're saying, we gain knowledge as time goes on and you deny it because something thousands of years old contradicts it. Grow up.
I haven't actually watched the doc yet, but theory goes that we were hit by thea, which obliterated that planet and almost ours. it turned earth into a super heated mass of molten rock and the earth's gravity kept the debris of the thea close, it clumped together solidified and becacme the moon. We know this because the moon contains rock which came from the earths mantel, and also the computer models used to test it showed exactly this, first time. It's a pretty solid theory
Maybe add some iron to moon to bring it back into Earth's influence.
When people say something like, this moon is the biggest in universe. Do we already explored the entire universe the stuff so big were not even shure if it is infinite. So we already knows all the moons in universe to say something like that. We?? Humans?? The ones who are not even sure about our own planet?? Neither our own mind?! OK...
My most favourite documentary of all time! 🌞 🌎 🌔
Very low standards huh?
I find a lot of these theories overly magnified and outright ludicrous
That means you have facts no other possess ... Liar ! You've found nothing it's a theory you thought of once please copy and paste 1% of your math at least so we can look over it . Smh pretending to be sciencist or some shit go cosplay elsewhere
In description, the wrong relationship in size. Earth is about 4 times bigger than the moon. This video is a hoax.
NerdRage less. Nerds.
@@l.m.892 The cake is a lie.....
What would be the proper magnification? What’s your alternative hypotheses?
When the moon hits the sky lika bigga pizza pie,
...that's amore.
Excellent documentary.😳😳😳
I love the moon I kinda wanna go for vacation there one day.
Well if you do make sure you're the first to moon someone on the moon
@@jasonspringer2983 that's my dream bro but probably not gonna happen.
@@elienaddour8973 yeah i guess spacesuits make mooning difficult. Have to settle for a Michael Jackson moonwalk
@@jasonspringer2983 lol yeah it's impossible with a spacesuit.
boy meets girl under silvery moon,boy and girl fall in love under silvery moon which explodes for no apparent reason.
I think full moon making animals more active makes sense. More light during what would usually be dark is sure to trigger some day/night cycle. Humans are naturally more sleep during dark so I would expect people being more active as well.
Never thought of it in that way. That does seem like it would make sense. Thanks for sharing my friend.
thanks for such most important information about moon and earth 👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼
What created the shadows of the jumping astronauts and how did the get through the Van Allen Radiation Belt?
the sun, the van allen belt is not a wall
All lies they didn't go to the Moon NASA admitted it when asked how we get through the Van Allen . Said "Well it's a problem"! But the 9/11 lie killed 4,000.
The US Gover ment needs a good impeachment, like Hillary Clinton ,looks sweet 16.
Hal 9000- why don’t you state your case instead of just posting insults? Add to the conversation- what you got?
@@Navigator001 The Van Allen belt is radiation pr.otecting the planet from debris. The bullshit moon projectile is made metal. The metal converts into X-rays zapping all humans. Mind you if they made one from recyclable plastic, then you're through like a bat from hell. The Greenie weenies will have a plan.after all big G made the world, neo Liberalism is part of Big G's plan in economics,self evident that the Bourgeoisie led by Trumpie Pumpie and the Republicans and their running dogs the Democratic Party showing Trumpy to as a Russian spy. They are truly blessed by big G.
Straight to that Tax free Heaven in the sky, Hillary is impeached already by wondefull morticians, in her pre death beauty treatment. Which will catch on like nuclear war. Pre -emting Global Warming
Good luck making flat earthers belive this.
TPC Caulking f****** flearthers and they’re flat feelings
THAT'S WHY GOD PUT THE MOON THERE
01:25 "Where no liquid water has ever been found"
Comes 26th October 2020
NASA: Hold my beer
It was first discovered by ISRO INDIA
@@adityabaware5857 Actually if you really wanna be picky the Russian's got there in the 70's... I was making a joke.
A couple of examples of full moons doesn't make the link between full moon and earthquake true.
Japan 2011 9.0 - Not full Moon
Chile 2010 8.8 - Not full Moon
Darfield 2010 7.1 - Not full Moon
Nepal 2015 7.8 - Not full Moon
Chile 2015 8.3 - Not full Moon
Chile 1960 9.5 - Not full Moon
Alaska 1964 9.2 - Not full Moon
Sumatra 2004 9.1 - Full Moon
Kamchatka 2004 9.0 - Not full Moon
Ecuador 1906 8.8 - Not full Moon
Alaska 1965 8.7 - Not full Moon
Sumatra 2012 8.6 - Not full Moon
Tibet 1950 8.6 - Not full Moon
Sumatra 2012 8.6 - Not full Moon
Alaska 1957 8.6 - Not full Moon
Sumatra 2007 8.5 - Not full Moon
Indonesia 1938 8.5 - Not full Moon
Kuril Islands 1963 8.5 - Not full Moon
+Laurence Hill Unfortunately, it just happens that people mistake or just lie. :)
Again I never dismissed the idea of the moon affecting humans they do NOT cause earthquakes though!
+Laurence Hill it was not that simple, the moon was more like a trigger, if the place was unstable and the moon passes by plus add the alignment of the sun, it could add more stress releasing that earthquake, it's more like the moon makes the quake trigger earlier than it's supposed to, those quakes you've listed got beyond the line of breaking point so they triggered
+Neil Janviere Rovillos I can't believe people are so naive that they think that the moon which by the way has less gravitational pull on it than the sun can trigger earthquakes the crustal stresses required for this to happen are far larger than what a body as small as the moon can generate!
like, I said, it was a trigger and it's more like winning a lottery because if the sun couldn't trigger it by itself then it needs added stress right, It just need to be at the right place at the right time
If asteroids are in orbit around our planet Earth ... how come we don't visit them? Or at least have close up photos of them. Why not?
Fuck that, I don't want ppl fucking with those things that close to Earth...
I have a dog called Moonie 🌚
Raych 90 probably the most interesting thing I've read in the comments so far:)
I know a Moonie called Dog.
Cuuute😻
My cats name is Deeogee. Spell the word DOG out loud.
Wow j love listening to yoh talk about the real storys of the moon 🌙 love your videos. ❤❤❤