The Most Unforgettable Villain I've Ever Seen
Вставка
- Опубліковано 20 жов 2023
- In this video essay I cover one of my favorite characters in Red Dead Redemption 2 - Dutch Van Der Linde. Dutch Van Der Linde is not just a mere antagonist. He's an enigma, a charismatic leader, and arguably one of the most compelling characters in video game history. In this video essay, I delve deep into the layers of Dutch's character, exploring his motivations, his evolution, and the intricate balance of idealism and realism that defines him.
From his unyielding charisma to his eventual descent into paranoia and madness, Dutch represents a masterclass in character development. Red Dead Redemption 2's narrative offers a portrayal of a man caught between his ideals and the unforgiving march of time. But who truly is Dutch Van Der Linde?
If you enjoyed this video essay, consider liking and subscribing for more deep dives into gaming's most iconic characters. Your support means a lot! I hope you enjoy this video essay.
#rdr2 #reddeadredemption #reddeadredemtion2 #dutchvanderlinde #dutch #videoessay #rockstar - Ігри
Hello there, I also made a video on Arthur Morgan: ua-cam.com/video/j0jRARi7sxk/v-deo.html
are you serious? don't you have any shame??? what's the point of giving a spoiler notice if you are just spoiling it in the title?????? I didn't even watch your video and now i know dutch is the antagonist. what is wrong with you??? why would you do that? why wouldn't you put another title?? why would you spoil the game for me when im just halfway there to the game??? you're just evil.
@@thedarksideofthemoon2 brother the game has been out for years cope harder
The true evil of Dutch isn’t his morals, personal views, or social dilemmas. It’s his ability to take far more than he’s willing to give.
wow you sound so smart
So....Another vanilla villain? And how does selfishness not fall under morals or social dilemmas? Nice pseudo-intellectual comment tho.
I think The truest evil is probably his willingness to kill innocent people
That's like the most basic thing to most villains. The way you wrote it makes it seem like you said something smart but it's a really clasdic thing to make villains unlikable or scared of. What really makes Dutch worse than many is his ability to manipulate people and play them, and charm and way with word makes people trust him easily to the point that till the end you want to believe that he can turn things around
@@kevink1575I absolutely agree with you. That pseudo intelligent shit is annoying as hell, you see it so often like with Breaking Bad fans for example and yet people see it comments like that and get an orgasm because of those "intelligent" and "thoughtful" comments
In his very first scene, Dutch commands a form of charisma and leadership that's very hard to break away from throughout the game, even as his true self continues to reveal itself.
Spot on. We can see how differently the gang members react and struggle with the changes.
@@ViciousTNT I think what makes Dutch such a fascinating and compelling villain compared to many others is how we get to see his own internal struggle with the decisions he makes.
Like, even in the final scene with him and Arthur, Arthur rightly calls him out for his faulty allegiances ('I gave you all I had') and we do see a flash of hesitation from Dutch. But by that point it's too late.
I think that Dutch is gamings equivalent to Walter White. We're led to believe that he changed over the course of the story into a bad man, but upon closer inspection realise this is who he truly was.
@matthewchristou8198 for me I never decided dutch was the enemy, because of his incredible charisma and speech, until the scene were he left Arthur to die you should have seen my face then I was enraged
@@Onezy05 That's a really good comparison; both characters are dark and complex. The folks that cling to Dutch's concussion in the botched bank robbery as the reason for his treachery are probably the same people who would make excuses for real world abusers.
@@A-ds1mt Precisely. At first I also thought that Dutch BECAME a bad man through his idealism constantly failing and the concussion, but then I think that I too was blinded by his charisma.
Rewatching the first chapter of the game again, I then realised that Dutch was always like this, what with the way he kept skirting round what happened in Blackwater that involved the murder of girl.
To use another more extreme comparison, people excuse Dutch's actions the same way they excuse Tony Sopranos actions, despite the fact that he does some horrendous shit. The guy is a racist, womanising murderer and even when he murders his own nephew people still make excuses for his actions just because his charisma is so captivating.
Dutch always struck me as kind of a cult leader: extremely charismatic, aggressively ideological, and undoubtedly megalomaniacal. what I wonder is whether he was at some point a better person and a good leader, or if he was always like that and we just see the process of Arthur figuring it out/the veneer falling away.
That's a great comparison, wish I had thought of it while writing 😄
I absolutely believe Dutch was a better person before. For example, after Reverend saved his life, Dutch inducted him into the gang. Even when Reverend was no more than an addict within the camp and not bringing anything in, Dutch still felt indebted to him.
Dutch also sent someone to bury Sadie’s husband. No one told him to. His good nature made him feel it was necessary.
Dutch used to giveaway the money they robbed to the poor and sick in towns. He accepted people from all backgrounds and colors in his gang at a time where the opposite could be seen as righteous. And he deeply cared for his family; evident with the muscle he pulled up with to get Jack back.
And while bringing up kids doesn’t make you a saint, it’s notable to mention that Dutch, Hosea & Susan raised several kids within their camps. Arthur, John, Tilly and eventually Jack as well. The first three being orphans that Dutch personally took charge of.
I think the combination of how fast America industrialized as well as better law enforcement and the public turning against them was overwhelming for him and it broke him. Combined with a head injury, it’s easy to see how Dutch changed from a good man.
Dutch started off as a good leader and a better person, what changed that was a combination of 3 factors:
1.) Micha Bell's bad influences.
2.) Pressure put on him by a rapidly changing west and a better breed of lawman that was making it harder for outlaws to dissappear.
3.) Eveloution of his own personal ideology spured on by recent philosophies from a particular author.
I guess we can also add in a 4th and 5th factor, the death of Hosea Matthews and Molly's betrayal which would cement his.... craziness that we see in the 1st game.
@@bigsmilereviews100 Did Dutch have a head injury?
@@Hoppelite There’s a theory that Dutch’s head injury during the Trolley mission in chapter 4 caused his spiral into madness. I don’t think it was the cause but maybe a catalyst for something already brewing. Normally, I wouldn’t have included it but it’s the fact that it’s the mission RIGHT after where Dutch questions Arthur’s faith with his chapter 6 tone. Dutch had questioned Arthur’s faith before but not as brutally as he did in the mission right after the Trolley.
Seeing the way Dutch led the gang in that Braithwaite Manor mission was a cross between ruthless gangster & a breathtakingly unhinged hero. Just off of his audacity alone made me feel like the Van Der Lindes at that point were no longer just outlaws, they were a family.
Kids were off god damm limit
The sad thing is, he didn't do that for Jack. He did it because he hates southerners, and he hates that they played him.
@@Bacxabergood point. But his audacity & swagger (despite his actual intentions inside of his crazy mind) during the whole mission was enough to galvanize the gang into following him to the manor for what they felt was for a good cause.
The visible pain on Arthur's face and in his voice when he tries and fails to convince Dutch to go back for Abigail... It's just heartbreaking how he realizes his "father" is completely gone at that point.
Spot on
I felt absolutely devastated when Dutch betrayed me in the mill like I was so sure he was gonna help me but when he didn’t I felt such an enormous amount of pain of betrayal I couldn’t believe it.
Ik when he leaves Arthur to die in the mill that was a moment when I realized I didn’t really know who he was anymore
"My whole life, all I did was fighting" that hit harder and harder every year I get older
Dutch’s fall from grace was the main reason why the gang collapsed. He decided to trust a man he knew was rotten to the core over his own son. Hosea dying truly changed him he began to feel overwhelmed and Micah was able to manipulate him and bring out his darker side. Dutch puts on a brave face but inside he has no idea what he is doing. Arthur getting TB made it so Arthur couldn’t take on the role of the angel on Dutch’s shoulder who helps him make the morally right and smart decisions. It’s only when Arthur is dying that he realises Arthur is right and he should have trusted Arthur all along. He thought Arthur was disloyal but Arthur was the most loyal of all the gang. If Dutch listened to Arthur perhaps a lot of the bad things that happened to the gang could have been avoided.
If my villain doesn’t have a plan, I don’t want them
Tahiti ? again?
"Do I really look like a guy with a plan?" -Joker
@@MeesdeFilmliefhebber And of course Joker very much had a plan, or plans, and intricate at that.
AND FAITH
Dutch killing an old woman and then carrying unconcious Javier on his shoulder in the same mission highlights the 'duality'. One of the most complex characters ever.
And y'all can see how a lot of people react to his death in RDR1 (those who played it after RDR2).
I never played the first RDR so I didn’t know the end of Dutch’s story, I was swept away in the story and I think I felt the way Arthur felt slowly realising what was happening to Dutch and the gang as a whole. Amazing story telling
Well said.
You have to play the first one. It’s age really shows when compared to this new age of games, but it’s still a lot of fun and the story is phenomenal. Luckily it’s a prequel so you haven’t really lost anything story wise by playing this one first, but I highly recommend you play the first game to get the full story
The first one is better imo, I just like the vibe and John Marston more.
@@loganwatson5905 I was not too sure about playing it because I watched my brother playing it a lot when we where kids so I felt I half played it even tho I never followed the story lol. I should give it a go now tho that I’m invested in the characters and story.
The reason why Dutch’s villain arc hits so hard is because of the way he builds you up before he tears it all down, you had so much more to lose with him than a typical villain. The only thing that can hurt you more than your enemies are your friends. You spend the first few chapters bonding with not only him but the entire gang. They become the family that you never had before, and then you have to do everything in your power to keep them taken care of and protected while you watch the only father figure you got to have slowly break down and turn on all of you. Then you keep on giving him your all hoping your making the right choice only to die having to know you were wrong.
The genius of Dutch in the first game is the enigma.
Whats only way to improve on that in red dead 2? They make you love him then remind you how his story winds up
Great point
Yeah, Dutch in the first game was almost like a supernatural force. 2 humanized him
RDR has everything, the best villain, the best protagonists, the best story, the best open world and a lot more.
RDR2 should of had badass John in the epilogue instead of the boring John we had during the story.
@@TheBlackReaperKaneki nobody is born with an interesting personality, it forms with time and experience.
I recon that John became more ruthless and angry as for years he's been fighting for a peaceful life. And as he finally got it in RDR2 epilogue, it was taken away again in RDR1.
Which is why he has more of a character, he had a taste of good family life and he is willing to wipe out his old friends and half a country to get it back.
@@nikodemwronowski5185 Get over yourself.
@@nikodemwronowski5185what about the 8 years between the main story and epilogue. Surely 8 years on him on his own defending and proving for his family would toughen him up instead of the 4 years ranching he did . From how John talks about himself in rdr1 it seemed that a younger John should’ve been hothead and ruthless with some morals, akined to Arthur but instead he’s honestly boring, he’s more incompetent and absent than compelling. Character development is evolving a character traits into something new. Rdr1 John and rdr2 john don’t have any similar traits that could evolved into one another. I think it’s more a missed opportunity.
Not really you're just simping
Dutch's Aura is unmatched
My favourite character Rockstar has ever created.
I believed in dutch just as much as Arthur did, and i fell just as hard as he did
Same
What makes Dutch so well-written is that you can almost never tell if he is lying or being honest.
Does he actually care about the gang? Or he merely sees them as expendable means to achieve a goal?
Is his plan to escape and live far away peacefully an actual thing? Or he was simply lying to gain the gang's trust?
And no matter what you think, both options would perfectly fit into his character. He is pretty much a living countersense.
One of the most unforgettable characters in videogame history indeed.
In a way, I feel for Dutch. The way he was written he really gives off a vibe of untreated bi polar disorder
yes!!
Late onset bipolar disorder?
Exactly. And the head injury he suffered on the Saint Dennis heist made it all much much worse
@@themagnus2919bot necessary, a lot of people with it really show no signs of it unless put through a lot of stress or when they go through hard times
Insanely well-written and picturesque script. It was a joy to listen to.
Thank you, I'm glad you enjoyed it ❤️
As someone who never knew the story of RDR1, I had one hell of a time watching Dutch fall. Like Arthur, I liked him at first as a badass gang leader with a moral compass before the story slowly peeled off those charismatic layers. My absolute breaking point was when he decided to help the Native Americans prank the US Army. He was willing to let what little remained of the Wapitis get brutally slaughtered just to attempt to create a diversion.
If you really look at it, Billy Grey from GTA TLAD was Dutch before Dutch. Johnny was Arthur, Brian was Micah, Jim was Charles. Riding in formation, the motorcycles were the horses. The correlation between these two games, in my mind, is undeniable.
Johnny was John
Never thought about that but you're right! You could also make a parallel with Niko Bellic "War is when the young and stupid are tricked by the old and bitter into killing each other.". As Arthur was trying to turn his life around, so did Niko but they were trapped in lawlessness by their past mistakes and family, Dutch and Roman who (involuntarily) forced him to kill the fat russian for the first time on american soil, restarting a cycle of tragic events.
GTA IV was my favourites of all the GTA, the scenario was so good, dramatic and realistic like a Scorcese movie and not just a fun parody like the other installments ( I didn't like GTA V's scenario which felt like a step back compared to GTA IV and the red dead series)
I fear the loss of scenario quality for future rockstar games now that Dan Houser left the company.
this content deserves more popularity
i would like to see some kind of video on micah because maybe he’s dishonorable, but he’s a good character that was also crucial to the story
Thank you, I'm glad you enjoyed it 😊
And thanks for the suggestion, he might be on my list for one of the future videos.
Fuck micah, he makes my damn blood boil like he's a real person. But that just shows how well he's written and acted because i wouldn't feel this way if he wasn't so well placed in the story. Damn i've never hated a game character more and t the same time i have never loved ad respected a game character like Arthur before either. This game has so much insane talent in it.
It's kind of ironic that you actually meet someone similar to Dutch's mindset of holding on. Around Rhodes is a man who wants you to get some items he lost from his old house. Later you find out he was a s catcher, and when you confront him he demands the respect he once had. The bow to the power he once held. When Arthur said that somethings, specifically this job, should die, I could help but see the connection right there. Like Him, outlaw and human catcher are dying occupations, with ragged soul desperate to hold on to them while the world willingly leaving them all to die.
I don't know. It was an interesting connection
If there's one scene showing progression and governance as an enemy Dutch can't beat in this game... it's the scene where him and Arthur enters Saint Denis for the first time. I'ts a depressive, yet very realistic sight, of the rise of the modern era. An era we now live in, in our real lives.
I think he's so dynamic because he's so relatable. I think a lot of us can relate with the feeling of being out of control and it's even harder if we ever had a position of authority or control in our lives even if it was illusory if we had it at one point the feeling of losing it and watching it spiral out of control can be not only heartbreaking but mine shattering. And that's what happens to Dutch. He just slowly watches his world get ripped apart and his family get destroyed and killed. Instead of reflecting on his fault in that he keeps blaming the external world for coming down around him rather than the choices he's making, which is leading his people further and further into chaos. In the end, whether he chose left or right, it's likely that the gang would have crumbled sooner or later. But the fact is he keeps making the wrong choices and he keeps it s acting with pure authority that gets more and more severe and authoritarian rather than listening to the council of his more rational friends. This is what happens when person is in power for too long. In my belief is that they become too intoxicated with their own legend with the concept that they are the leader and they can fix things when in reality. Dutch was only ever the inspiration, but he was never the only leader of the gang. It was always led by all three of them but the further he took control the further out of control. The situation got and that's where you get his tragic flaw. The belief that he can fix things that he alone has a plan. That's what's so beautiful about his storytelling is that it is a perfect rendition of the tragic flaw that leads Dutch from being an anti-hero to a true villain, especially in the first Red Dead redemption where you see his madness come to a full culmination and so it's so amazing to watch that madness to send slowly from the icon of almost and anarchic commune in the style of some old Romani caravan up against the world into an authoritarian and brutal regime that eliminates dissent and uses terror as a tool of control, and it's not entirely his fault as you can see how he was manipulated by people like Micah. But still in the end It is on Dutch for falling in love with his own legend and believing his own hype that led to the downfall of their found family because he stopped seeing them as family and started seeing them as underlings.
Dutch always felt like Walter white. A humble man who cared for his people, and wanted to make money to have a good life, but eventually his ego was his downfall, and like walter, finally accepts why he continued doing the things he did
Hell of a dive into Dutch's character. I think you just made one of the best RDR2 video essays
Thank you so much for the kind words ❤️ I'm glad you enjoyed the video
The professional has a much better video on Dutch.
Dutch's arc reminds me of Jesse James' arc in the 2007 movie _Assassination of Jesse James by the coward Robert Ford._ I believe it's only loosely based on Jesse's life and the James gang. Either way it's a movie that was definitely known to someone on the team at Rockstar during development of RDR2, because one of the train robbery missions begins with a cutscene that is nearly a shot for shot replication of Jesse James stopping the money train at the beginning of the movie. The movie isn't as action packed as RDR2, but if you've seen it, it's very hard to ignore the parallels between the 2 gangs, their struggle against the tides of change, and most notably, their charismatic leader's descent into paranoia and self-destruction.
The botched trolley job threw his decline into high gear not because of a head bump but because he finally saw how close he was to ultimate failure, death with no payout. He was on a razors edge and knew he had to get drastic both to deal with money issues and evade the chaos sewn in Blackwater and even before. Eventually lashing out everywhere was his only solution.
Dutch strongly reminds me of my late father, both in terms of his positive and negative attributes.
Same
The epilogue story with Evelyn Miller touches on it, Dutch's 'practical' decisions highlight it, and his dialogue hints at it, but his goals and ideology always echoed the very societal constructs that he wished to replace; A hierarchy with a wise and powerful white savior (himself) at the top and everyone else in blissful and grateful subservience.
In both games, Natives are just cannon fodder to him and, when he's hyping up Tahiti or New Guinea as potential destinations, he promises dancing girls but also free land ripe for the taking as if those places weren't already inhabited Dutch's disdain for the wealthy exploiting everyone and everything around them often comes across as him believing that he could have done it better, not that it shouldn't have been done in the first place.
Where did the dancing girls come from, Dutch? Early English settlers, like John Smith, would fabricate tales of the sexual availability of Native women to entice more Englishmen to colonize the Americas. Dutch's odd promise may have been a reference to that. It could also be referencing the annexation of Hawaii and the overthrow of it's monarchy by the U.S.
I may be reading too much into it but, the level of research, and the volume of historical Easter eggs in the making of this game make it hard to believe that it was just random lines and not a hint that Dutch had ambitions of colonization himself.
I don't believe he did though. What he wanted was a land where he could pursue a lifestyle of running and gunning, always fighting, him talking about going to Tahiti or some such were all just carrots on a stick for the gang, or even lying to himself, he could've used that gold to get out and do exactly that but he never did. He stayed behind and rally'd disillusioned natives for nothing more than to keep up his fight against encroaching modernization. You have to consider what Dutch considers his ideal would be when he was younger, which would lineup in the classical era of the west and doing all that entails for outlaws. Dutch found his true nature to be violent, and he seemed to have relished in that in the events of RDR1, and we get the start of that snowballing since the blackwater massacre before RDR2. Seeing it through an anti imperialist lens doesn't add up when his big thing at the end of the first game is how the world has no place for men like him anymore, living wildly.
They’re in a cult. Dutch’s gang was a cult.
Dutch had all the loyalty but not the money. Bronte had all the money but not the loyalty. This is why both characters show the weakness of the other. Another reason to make this one of my favorite games of all time.
Great comparison
he had a lot of money actually, he didn't leave the blackwater money in blackwater he had it stored away near camp, later in the cave. the amount that is in the chest was enough to make a single person rich for years, and would have been enough for them all to escape the law to tihiti
Dutch is much more complex then some think Low Honour Arthur tells a pretty interesting story about Dutch.
What story Arthur tells?
@@MissWampire Low Honour Arthur Talks about How he once Robbed an Old man A dutch gave shit saying taking from him was made Arthur no better then Government they were fighting against.
Dutch has never changed, the one that changed was Arthur, who was literally undergoing a redemption arc. He constantly doubted the gang leadership and doing things behind Dutch’s back. In a normal gang he would have been shot.
Dutch asked him to either be with him or cut loose, don’t be there and just doubt, this is why he left him to die in the end.
The whole John situation is even more insane. He was arrested when everyone else was shot on sight, wasn’t executed by the time they got back from Caribbean, if this does not smell rat I don’t now what does lol only way to clear his name is wait for the law to actually hang him, so he could rescue John knowing he is not the rat. But Arthur had to break him out early because “I felt different” now Dutch has no way to know if he can trust either of them.
You deserve one million subscribers man, your content is gorgeous!
Thank you, I'm glad you enjoyed it 😊
The footage is just RDR2 which is a gorgeous game, haha. But I agree the video was really well put together!
Oh shut up
Solid video! I'm continually impressed by the clips you chose and the voice acting within them. I enjoy the theme of industry and change being such a motivator for Dutch. The outdated gunslinger is a great motif that you see in other westerns like Rango or Unforgiven. I'd recommend watching both of those movies. Engaging video as always.
Thank you 😊
I’ve said since 2018 after the game released just how great of a character Dutch van der linde is I’m not going to get into it all again but I’m glad that more and more people share my views on my favourite characters in my favourite games
Been a fan of the redemption saga since the beginning in 2010
Outlaws for life
Wild how the red dead franchise alone arguably has 3 of the best written video game characters (Arthur, Dutch, and John). Rockstar games at its finest.
Dutch is probably the only Twist villain that ever worked on me, I seriously saw him as a father figure, a good man who had good morals... But by the time I got to the mission where he kills Bronte... I started to doubt, just like Arthur, and on Guarma, I started pressing X to doubt even more... And I finally realized what he really was in Chapter 6, he's a master-manipulator who sees himself as exactly what Milton said he thought he was, "The Messiah to lost souls", he's the best villain I've ever seen in media, while Micah is more of your stereotypical "do bad 4 bad" Dutch is the same, but he's able to conceal it with words of grandiour and words of cunning, he's someone even worse than Micah, cause at least Micah openly shows it, but Dutch criticises people for doing the exact same thjng he does, hell, you know about the girl he killed on the Ferry? Heidi Mccort? She wasn't just a random girl, eye witnesses said she's apparently a MOTHER too, so Dutch Orphaned a child, yet he looks down on the O'Driscolls for killing a woman's husband? What's the difference between him and Colm? Well, if you really look deep into his character... The only difference is that he doesn't give his money to people to work for him... So... Does that really make him better...? Or does he just see himself as that through his skewed worldview? The only real difference is that he wants to have as fewer people, and none to pay... He's just as bad as teh people criticizes, he's a hypocrite, and he doesn't really care...
"You can't fight the future don't waste your life trying." -The white shadow
Honestly, Dutch would be a great CEO today.
Haha, great point 😄
Thanks for making me think about my place in this day and age and understand that I literally don’t know where tf that is. Kudos to you and the RDR2 team.
omg such a good video! i was already a big fan of ur last essay about arthur. keep it going!
Thank you so much ❤️ I'll do my best
Our time is passed john.
You are one of the best writers and creator I've come across. We'll watch your career with great interest
Thank you ❤️ I'm glad you enjoyed it.
I didn't remember the story of the first red dead because I was so young, so I decided to go in blind...I ended up gettting attached ro the characters and Dutch's fall from grace was genuinely hurtful.
As a character, he's goated. Micah is a great written character aswell
True, I've been thinking about writing one about Micah as well
For me it's the constant questioning of if he's evil or not. It's the uncertainty of where he stands and if he is with or against you as a player. I feel for him just as much as I despise him and all those feelings switch from moment to moment. His relationship with Arthur and how he is tge father figure Arthur never got makes the rip between them even more heart wreanching.
Well said
I stand by what I said in your latest rdr2 video. The next game should be another prequel. Where you play as Dutch Hosea or young Arthur or John or a NEW character that met them right when the gang formed but I'd prefer Hosea right before he met Dutch and we see how they swindle each other. Then we see the "golden age" of the gang and either it really is that or what we hear about it in rdr2 is actually a romanticized version of the past where when they look back nostalgia clouds them and it's really always been this way and that's why they've always been on the run. Because if you think about it after almost 20 years they should have been able to find SOMEWHERE to go. Unless it's always been this way. I feel like that would b the best sequel/prequel but that's just my opinion.
Great video, I can't believe you only have 2.7K subs, that's a borderline crime!
Amazing video ! 😄 Thank you !
I'm so glad you enjoyed it. Thank you 😊
I'm actually a guy who doesn't like change, so I reject it the best I can but them I notice, we can't fight change or gravity or pain as an wise crazy man said, so no matter how much it hurts I adapt to the change or I would get lost as the wise crazy man did.
Beautiful writing! Love your videos
Thank you for the kind words ❤️ I'll do my best so it's worth sticking around.
Enjoyed the video. I once posted a comment on a red dead redemption video and I'll post it here because it makes sense still. "John Asked Dutch why he was there. Dutch responded, "Same as you I suppose." Dutch came to kill Micah. Dutch is very interesting as a villian. If you notice through out the series, he almost never says he is wrong. When he's being strung along by micah, you can see it in Dutch's face that he knows he isn't right but he can't admit that he is wrong. Like When he was watching arthur die on the mountain. Dutch's face was extremely sad. He said "I" several times, but he couldn't say "I'm sorry" because it would have meant that he was wrong. thats why he left Micah then instead of joining him. I guess you could say Dutch leaving the cash was his way of apologizing to John and Arthur. Since there was no other reason for him to do so and he was entirely silent because he couldn't say what he needed to say, because his personality doesn't allow him to admit when he's wrong."
However someone esle's comment made me change my view on the latter part of my comment. Dutch left John the money because for Dutch it had never been about the money. It was about doing what he wanted and the money was a means to get people to follow and do his will. Like when Dutch strangled the hispanic old woman. He never bothered to get the gold bar back from her body because He didn't care about the money.
I agree, people for Dutch were assets to build his dream and to continue his fight. Money can't buy loyalty, but vision can.
And I'm glad you enjoyed the video 😊
Dutch apologies to Hosea and Arthur for Blackwater in a camp interaction, apologies to Arthur after the Colm debacle in a camp interaction. apologies to everyone after Saint-Denis (which wasn't even his fault, it was Hosea's idea) , and maybe more I'm forgetting.
he didn't care about the gold bar because back at camp he had a chest full of money. the gold bar would slow him down
When I start the game over for the dozenth time. I like Dutch in the beginning even knowing what he does to Arthur. That’s a great fucking character!
Whenever Dutch's mission icon popped up, I knew something either very good or very bad would happen.
What makes dutch a villain is that he is unable to admit he is wrong or when he fails he takes micah over arthur even though he knew micah was a traitor but he just couldn't admit he made a mistake and like he told john dutch himself is a paradox he knows people can't fight nature or change but dutch's nature is to fight even though is a lost battle
in camp dialogue he admits he is wrong multiple times
Its amazing how well written this game is
Rdr1 and Rdr2 are one of the best video games ever made
100%
The thkng about Dutch is that he lies to everyone including himself it is only in rdr 1 is Dutch honest to himself
I had a goddamn PLAN!!
Great video man. You just got another subscriber.
Thank you 😊 I'll do my best to make it worthwhile to stick around.
I think the best part of Dutch is the fact that over the course of the story we slowly believe that he does not care about anyone in the game only for it to be revealed that he loved Arthur more than himself and his ego.
Everytime I see a video of Dutch I wanna play the game again for the third time.
after my 5th, same
wow, what a goddamn video. amazing bro
Thank you. I'm glad you enjoyed it 😊
bro you did so well on that Thumbnail
Spectacular video 🎉🎉🎉 fantastic job 👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾
Thank you. I'm glad you enjoyed it 😊
here's hoping that we get a 'Red Dead Revolution' game, set during the end of the civil war.
That would be wild 🙌
@@ViciousTNT sadly, no houser brothers so who knows if it'd be the same
I feel like Dutch’s “plan” to escape for a better life was always a lie. Or at least he abounded it not long after the story started. They definitely had enough money to flee way before the events that led to the ultimate downfall of the gang. Yet Dutch continued to risk it all because it was never enough for him. And his real goal was to do as much damage as he could before he was inevitably snuffed out by the government
Great video, thanks
Thank you. I'm glad you enjoyed it 😊
It hurts so much that as arther is dying you can see Dutch wants to listen but micah keeps pushing him to a bad side. Arther learned so much from hosea that Dutch sees it as betrayal. Arther tried so hard and Dutch chooses Micah over him and I don’t see how Dutch could do that to his “son”
Dutch always has a plan and yet his plan always back fire on him
During that intro I thought there was going to be a comedic cut to you saying "these are things the first game has"
Missed opportunity 😄
I think the most unforgettable villain in my opinion is Micha
He is definitely someone who sticks with you. I have an idea for how to cover him in a different manner in the future
na, Micha is too evil. he pretty much has no redeeming qualities. not a terrible character though, he is just one dimensional and not that much to him. he only really serves the plot by getting in dutch's "ear". and partly being responsible for dutch's turn to madness. Micha is not up there with the greatest of video gaming like Dutch is. when people think who is the main villain of the rdr series it will be Dutch not Micha. only ross has a close second due to his villainy being also well motivated.
Who ?
Benjamin Davis help made Dutch into the character he is now! His casting as him was peak!
The only thing he constantly reminds me of is that he got a plan
This was awesome
I'm glad you enjoyed it 😊
Dutch doing himself shouldn't surprise me as much as it did but ironically enough in his death he warned John I wished he listened
I feel that Micah is the main reason for the gangs downfall.
For all of Dutch’s flaws, the gang was somewhat able to keep him in check, albeit to a lesser degree than preferred.
Micah’s bizarre ability to gain Dutch, and ONLY Dutch’s trust and respect, allowed him to influence many of Dutch’s decisions from Chapter 3 onward.
Why the gang didn’t execute or excommunicate Micah after, at the least, his attempted raping of Sadie will never not baffle me.
oh wow we never knew that 😨😱😐
Calling Dutch a villain would have more sense if the one he calls a plan would have worked and then he switches his tone, his plan never really got concluded, money and being free out of the country with all the gang.
Whats crazy is that dutch occasionally slips up and shows his true colors on accident(he sometimes says "I" instead of we or us)
Thanks for this video, I never really played Dead Red Redemption 1, so I played this barely this month. I really wanted Arthur to make Dutch see the light. As Dutch begins to become more paranoid. I wonder if anyone here saw the movie with James McAvoy and Forest Whittaker called "The Last King of Scotland"? When we meet Idi Amin in the movie, he seems charismatic and overall a good guy, but as he starts settling into power he starts feeling the pressure of being a leader, and he becomes paranoid. I think Micah's poison is what does this, he whispers in Dutch's ears the idea of disloyalty. And as he knows that counseling Dutch will lead to Arthur and the others questioning him, he steers him into that paranoia. So I really wanted Dutch to see the light, but by the end he's too fargone and that's sad as hell. We killed Micah, sure, we avenged Arthur, but we permanently lost Dutch. And for what I saw of RDR1, he just fell into madness by that point, and by the end when he talks to John, he's just but a shadow of his former self and just riddled with guilt that he won't admit, because then it would become real in his mind.
We aren't criminals we are outlaws
"Oh, the doubting!!"
Dutch turned into a villian in the epilogue and in RDR1.
I wouldn’t be surprised to play as Dutch in RDR3
I though Dutch was a protagonist until rdr1 events
I have been stuck in the epilouge for the past two years now trying to get 100% completion on the game. Maybe i should just start again and do as much as i can as arthur because the game feels empty once you have done 89% complesion as john.
He had mad drip though
He’s more of a cult leader than a father figure
He loves the gang his thirst for power and his unwillingness to stop when he must brought his downfall he never wanted to get to Tahiti it was just a fake goal to give the others the impression that he had a final destination. What he loved and wanted was to lead a gang of people who wouldn't abide by society's rules
Love characters like dutch van der linde illusive man gray characters they are neither good or pure evil.
In RDR2 he had one bad idea after another.
Pro video again
Thank you 😊
underrated
Thank you. I'm glad you enjoyed it 😊
I want to do a deep dive on Dutch's ideology, considering how similar my own beliefs are.
In my life i try to remain at my core the same old me but i leave room to adapt. In my mind if every few years your still the exact same person then your not trully living to the fullest because to me life and change go hand in hand. To live and not adapt or change is to be intelectually dead and stuck. Dont be so open minded your brain falls out but adapt and be willing to learn and expand your perspective.
Well said.
@@ViciousTNT thanks
Dutch was like Palpatine with the integrity to throw him down the shaft…
Hosea was Tarkin, Arthur was Vader, John was Luke. Being outlaws they already live outside conventional morality so you can focus on the inner politics.
Because it’s not like we’ll ever getting rid of gangsters and outcasts