@@truthseeking3818 hate to break it to you but for this type of orbit, and this heavy of a payload, Falcon Heavy wouldn’t be able to launched in the reusable configuration. Not only that, but their upper stage doesn’t have the same performance as the hydrolox DCSS, and they also don’t have RAAN steering capability. So nice try, but reusability is a moot argument in this case.
@@truthseeking3818 And honestly, what I think personally about a launch system isn't based off of what others think about it. So...thanks for your input but no thanks. It's an amazing piece of machinery. I like it. That's all that matters to me.
Yeah man same here... ULAs weird like that eh? They've got such a totally rad platform, but they are deeeefinitely a **COMPANY** y'know? they do whatever they do and we're supposed to be thankfull for our scraps. (Is the feeling I've always gotten, anyway)
What happens to the pieces that are cut loose during launch? I'm guessing the early released parts fall back to earth but what about the bits that are much higher. 🤔
Too bad that the outer booster is blocking the view. I know there are aerodynamical reasons no to do but can't the camera be mounted a bit more outwards so that there's more to see?
It's not a reality show primary/secondary task. Camera view intended for technical investigation in case of possible issues of launch. So you should enjoy watching as it is kindly provided, sorry. 🙋
@@zacharys41 sepratrons??? ie never heard that term before man haha that's rad as all get out... so explosive bolts mixed with what, small rockets for lateral thrust??
Thanks, I was trying to call attention to his mistake. (The rocket is not supersonic at that moment.) He repeats the "miles per hour"-mistake again later. Wonder if he should have said kilometers per hour or feet per second?
Why isn’t there a rocket cam just like this that continues to go out into space?? We are all waiting for that video. We have been waiting for it since the last moon mission. We all deserve a recent video where it starts at earth land and ends going past moon.
Hey, show us the video of the boosters and core flying back and landing on their legs. What? One time use?! Seriously? How will you compete with Starship?
They should put cameras on those boosters, so we can see where they end up. I've read that there is an area in Southern Ocean, which is a no-go for sailors as it is used as a dumping ground for ULA single use rockets.
@@nyhtopossu4858 I'm sorry, but it seems I'm misunderstood you. Additional equipment will give *more* pollution, isn't it? P.S. I hate soviet. And everything related. But to blame ULA for that looks strange to say the least.
@@zerosugar8026 Nope. Nothing can float in mid air. Anything you launch from Earth, either flies very fast up, or falls, also quite fast down, or moves at very fast speed in orbit. but nothing floats in the air. You should know that by that age.
@@max5250 ok you are arguing semantics. Why did the rocket not "orbit" along with capsule? They were in the exact same position yet one "returned" to earth and one remained in orbit. Why?
@@zerosugar8026 I am not arguing semantics, just explaining something you got completely wrong. Once the rocket and its payload reach stable orbit, rocket detaches payload (which continue orbiting), and it is oriented to the surface of Earth, and it falls down.
now wait just a minute. Why didnt it hit the ceiling ??? And I clearly see a curvature of the earth and that is definitely not a fish eye lens ?? This is very unsettling 😉
@@colinsouthern All my life I've seen so much progress. I know we need to research, but I guess I feel like I may miss out on the grand discoveries in my life time.
If you're good at math, this video will tell you orbit, weight of the payload, and some more tiny bits of info. Did you see the size of the vacuum rocket nozzle? LOL
Nope, Ray, it's more like your slow motion brain, that thinks you are an CGI expert, although you couldn't tell CGI from real video, even if you wanted to.
Pourquoi les caméras ne tournent jamais? Toujours à filmer le fuselage, mais jamais sur les côtés, ni même sur l'avant? Stéph. Why do the cameras never turn? Always filming the fuselage, but never on the sides, or even the front? Steph.
@@max5250 AH AH merci pour l'explication de la caméra fixée! J'avais besoin de votre explication! Donc puisque vous savez tout, pourquoi ces caméras sont fixées et non posées sur un axe rotatif? Etes vous caméraman? Ne connaissez vous pas les caméras sur pieds ou axes permettant leurs rotations? Vraiment étrange! Stéph. AH AH thank you for the explanation of the fixed camera! I needed your explanation! So since you know everything, why are these cameras fixed and not on a rotating axis? Are you a cameraman? Don't you know about cameras on stands or axes allowing their rotation? Really strange! Stéph.
@@SB5SimulationsFerroviairesEEP Really strange?! Well, it is really strange that you needed that explanation. And, no, I haven't said I know everything, but regarding the subject we are discussing, I know quite a lot, and much more than you do. Why is this camera fixed? Because someone decided so. You want camera "on a rotating axis"?! No problem, fund your own rocket, place a camera "on a rotating axis" on that rocket, and launch it into the space. What could be easier than that? Question for you: How many cameras there are in the world, and what percent of these cameras is fixed?!
@@olileoli2788 yeeeeeaaa man, no kidding.... i was reffering to your beautifully ironic question "do you are have stupid?" haha that was great dude... you must constantly have a dry mouth and bloody knuckles, eh? =)
As close to riding the rocket as I'll ever get. Well done.
That is amazing footage! Thank you so much for sharing!
That extendable nozzle is the best
Delta is the coolest rocket to watch. I hope Valcan is just as cool to watch.
Thanks. I enjoy the blue/black distinction between earth and space.
Oh my!! Lovin the rocket cam!!
Please do this for every launch! If you already do...disregard. haha THIS IS SO AWESOME! Love this launch system!
How can you love this dinosaur of a system?
Wasteful, high cost, outdated tech.
@@truthseeking3818 what does the competitor do that this launch system doesn’t?
@@sabretechv2 lands and resuses their boosters?
@@truthseeking3818 hate to break it to you but for this type of orbit, and this heavy of a payload, Falcon Heavy wouldn’t be able to launched in the reusable configuration. Not only that, but their upper stage doesn’t have the same performance as the hydrolox DCSS, and they also don’t have RAAN steering capability. So nice try, but reusability is a moot argument in this case.
@@truthseeking3818 And honestly, what I think personally about a launch system isn't based off of what others think about it. So...thanks for your input but no thanks. It's an amazing piece of machinery. I like it. That's all that matters to me.
This is some fantastic footage! It is really unfortunate that UA-cam distorts and pixelates the original video with its compression algorithms.
Ngầu vậy ta wauuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuooooooooooooooo ô mai cái
Let's gooooooo!!!! Rocket cam ftw!
Fantastic launch!
Thank you for sharing. Go ULA!
Man that was cool. It'll be sad to see the Delta 4 retired.
now that was an epic ride to space, i could watch this for hours
Great rocket cam!
belíssimas imagens ... parabéns
Great launch!
Outstanding 👍🏽
Look at the circle of the Earth 🌍
Just what I was thinking. I assume there are a lot of people upset the earth doesn’t appear to back their source of significance.
What is the Net Deployment in the last few seconds? I have never seen or heard that call out before.
Awesome!!!
I love this stuff.
Go Rocket Cam, GO!
So did you have a load of Heifers from Iowa on board or what?
I thought I missed a live stream. Nope this was last week’s launch.
Yeah man same here... ULAs weird like that eh? They've got such a totally rad platform, but they are deeeefinitely a **COMPANY** y'know? they do whatever they do and we're supposed to be thankfull for our scraps.
(Is the feeling I've always gotten, anyway)
Ha! I was thinking that too.
What happens to that discarded first stage?
Brilliant!
Wow look the earth is round!
This video has to make the flat earthers crazy!
People who think the earth is flat are already crazy.
Found myself in the video! (off the side of the highway on the ground 5 miles away)
So cool
Wooohooooo
So wait. You said the rocket is in pitch over maneuver at 23 seconds after liftoff? I guess the space shuttle was really slow to get this point.
What happens to the pieces that are cut loose during launch? I'm guessing the early released parts fall back to earth but what about the bits that are much higher. 🤔
probably ends up as space trash... playing kerbal space program with similar rockets shows how much trash you throw into space every launch.
nice
Would a video with the original sound be possible?
I agree ! I dont know why every video someone posts always has to have some terrible music with it..
The single most epic way to depart from California
Too bad that the outer booster is blocking the view. I know there are aerodynamical reasons no to do but can't the camera be mounted a bit more outwards so that there's more to see?
It's not a reality show primary/secondary task. Camera view intended for technical investigation in case of possible issues of launch. So you should enjoy watching as it is kindly provided, sorry. 🙋
Have you pay attention to see *magic ice fireball burst* at 04:46 ? ;)
At 4:06 , is the separation done by explosive ?
Yes, I believe that is the explosive bolt seperators
Explosive bolts are common in non-reusable vehicles.
They’re actually sepratrons, which fire to push the side boosters away from the center core.
@@zacharys41 Somebody go grab Rocket Propulsion Elements lol
@@zacharys41 sepratrons??? ie never heard that term before man haha that's rad as all get out... so explosive bolts mixed with what, small rockets for lateral thrust??
You guys are still in business... crazy. Hey engineers spacex is hiring 😀
They have over 60 launches sold between atlas, delta and vulcan left. They have business for well over a decade
Go ULA
It was quite weird to watch this in person
Urraaahhh
We need to hear the sound of the rocket
thats one long bell on the second stage
0:32 Darn You CGI 😂
How fast did he say it was going at T+50s?
You can provide time label referring current video as [hh:]mm:ss
UA-cam make it clickable ☝️😀
For example 00:50
01:02 "... traveling 9 hundred 'n' {seventy?} miles per hour ..."
🤔 970 miles/h ?
Thanks, I was trying to call attention to his mistake. (The rocket is not supersonic at that moment.) He repeats the "miles per hour"-mistake again later. Wonder if he should have said kilometers per hour or feet per second?
❤🇺🇸✔
BRASIL SÃO PAULO.
Oh no… flat earthers!
Looks like its from vandimburg.
Wow and the narrator said “nominal”
only once.
Good thing they didn't include any audio from the pad that would have been distracting
Why isn’t there a rocket cam just like this that continues to go out into space?? We are all waiting for that video. We have been waiting for it since the last moon mission. We all deserve a recent video where it starts at earth land and ends going past moon.
Why? Because it's expensive to send a rocket past the moon just for a camera shot.
Data is very precious in space. Far to expensive for fun and games
Why ? what would be the point ?
Hey, show us the video of the boosters and core flying back and landing on their legs.
What? One time use?! Seriously?
How will you compete with Starship?
Check mate, flat Earthers!
they always use fisheye camera
@@M-1453 You have no clue about camera lenses do you ? Or in fact no clue about anything
@@M-1453 let me know if the video link shows up
They should put cameras on those boosters, so we can see where they end up. I've read that there is an area in Southern Ocean, which is a no-go for sailors as it is used as a dumping ground for ULA single use rockets.
It is huge objects easily detectable by radars. No cameras needed. Forbidden zone has been preset much earlier.
@@santka3739 I don't have a radar, so cameras would be better for me. Mostly to show how ULA is polluting oceans with their Soviet-style operation.
@@nyhtopossu4858 I'm sorry, but it seems I'm misunderstood you.
Additional equipment will give *more* pollution, isn't it?
P.S. I hate soviet. And everything related. But to blame ULA for that looks strange to say the least.
Kyrie. The earth is not flat. .
.......ESPETACULAR.............INCRÍVEL.......
This should put the flat-earther's claims to rest.
How?
@@lostmymarbles9151 You know how. You just can't admit it to yourself. Denial at it's finest.
They will cry fish eye lens and cgi
@@lostmymarbles9151 show video of your flat Earth dome
@@mikecrownshaw1646 😂
And i thought MY gas mileage was bad !
The announcements are way off 🤔
Why didn't the booster keep floating? Why did it fall back to earth?
Why would it "keep floating" if it wasn't floating before it was disconnected from the rocket?
@@max5250 the capsule floated though
@@zerosugar8026
Nope.
Nothing can float in mid air.
Anything you launch from Earth, either flies very fast up, or falls, also quite fast down, or moves at very fast speed in orbit. but nothing floats in the air.
You should know that by that age.
@@max5250 ok you are arguing semantics. Why did the rocket not "orbit" along with capsule? They were in the exact same position yet one "returned" to earth and one remained in orbit. Why?
@@zerosugar8026
I am not arguing semantics, just explaining something you got completely wrong.
Once the rocket and its payload reach stable orbit, rocket detaches payload (which continue orbiting), and it is oriented to the surface of Earth, and it falls down.
Now they go straight up?🧐
now wait just a minute. Why didnt it hit the ceiling ??? And I clearly see a curvature of the earth and that is definitely not a fish eye lens ?? This is very unsettling 😉
wow! actual video of the delta virus being released!!
Look up V2
@@rachaelfleming7132 yep. your tax dollars hard at work!
Why are we still in LEO?
We are NOT sheesh
But you will of course deny anything that isnt
@@gowdsake7103 not a denier. I know we have satellites out past the heliopause and rovers on Mars. I meant humanity. Why aren’t humans out there?
@@colinsouthern Thanks. I was hoping its not just about the money. We seemed to have so much steam until ISS was put in service.
@@colinsouthern All my life I've seen so much progress. I know we need to research, but I guess I feel like I may miss out on the grand discoveries in my life time.
First!
Go nasa
... wait... what? haha
There's that flat earth again lol......
If you're good at math, this video will tell you orbit, weight of the payload, and some more tiny bits of info. Did you see the size of the vacuum rocket nozzle? LOL
but wait….
the Earth doesn’t look flat
Earth is FLAT! This is fake cgi.
@@FloridaExplorer777 lame excuse!
@@FloridaExplorer777 prove earth is flat.
Oh wait look look the earth is not flat it's round it's a globe it's a sphere.
thumb down are flatards.
It never gets old watching SpaceX Booster Landing Videos. Where are ULA's booster landing videos?
They don't land🤦♂️
No thinkable reason to have too much risk getting videos of such *"big-buda-boo-o-om* "landing" (actually "watering" 😀).
Opa!!! Eu vi o foguete batendo de raspão no domo da Terra kkkkkkkkkkkk
Oops !!! I saw the rocket grazing the Earth's dome kkkkkkkkkkkk
Really ? then your insane
5,000 pounds of fuel per second that rocket burns! I can’t wait for the day we no longer burn fossil fuels to get into space.
Delta IV uses Liquid Hydrogen and Oxygen
@@air_ I stand corrected, thanks. 👍🏻 I still look forward to the next advancement in propulsion technology. It will be a game changer.
Slow motion cgi
Nope, Ray, it's more like your slow motion brain, that thinks you are an CGI expert, although you couldn't tell CGI from real video, even if you wanted to.
Pourquoi les caméras ne tournent jamais? Toujours à filmer le fuselage, mais jamais sur les côtés, ni même sur l'avant? Stéph.
Why do the cameras never turn? Always filming the fuselage, but never on the sides, or even the front? Steph.
Because camera is fixed to the rocket, not mounted on rotating mount.
What would be your next question:"Where is the cameraman?"?!
@@max5250 AH AH merci pour l'explication de la caméra fixée! J'avais besoin de votre explication! Donc puisque vous savez tout, pourquoi ces caméras sont fixées et non posées sur un axe rotatif? Etes vous caméraman? Ne connaissez vous pas les caméras sur pieds ou axes permettant leurs rotations? Vraiment étrange! Stéph.
AH AH thank you for the explanation of the fixed camera! I needed your explanation! So since you know everything, why are these cameras fixed and not on a rotating axis? Are you a cameraman? Don't you know about cameras on stands or axes allowing their rotation? Really strange! Stéph.
@@SB5SimulationsFerroviairesEEP
Really strange?!
Well, it is really strange that you needed that explanation.
And, no, I haven't said I know everything, but regarding the subject we are discussing, I know quite a lot, and much more than you do.
Why is this camera fixed?
Because someone decided so.
You want camera "on a rotating axis"?!
No problem, fund your own rocket, place a camera "on a rotating axis" on that rocket, and launch it into the space.
What could be easier than that?
Question for you:
How many cameras there are in the world, and what percent of these cameras is fixed?!
Go spacex
Do you are have stupid
@@olileoli2788 hahaha what???
@@ScumfuckMcDoucheface this is a ULA launch
@@olileoli2788 yeeeeeaaa man, no kidding.... i was reffering to your beautifully ironic question "do you are have stupid?" haha that was great dude... you must constantly have a dry mouth and bloody knuckles, eh? =)
@@ScumfuckMcDoucheface in youtube comments, yes.
SpaceX does it better.
At least it's not the horrid Musk or Bezos!!
Flat as ever.
You're delusional as ever.
Let's see your dome
This is very scary that you play with chemicals.
Except we know that the chemist bit is a
LIE
The only thing flat is your head