NeXTSTEP vs Mac OS X - System Demo and Comparison

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 12 січ 2017
  • Subscribe for New Content ● subscribe.thecomputerclan.com
    Get Your Tech Gear Here ● thecomputerclan.com/gear
    Looking for Tech Training? ● thecomputerclan.com/training
    Ever wonder where a majority of Mac OS X's roots came from? Watch this NeXT video, and find out… (see what I did there?).
    While Steve was away from Apple, he created NeXT, a company that would later be acquired by Apple. It probably wasn't known at the time, but NeXT's technologies would form many elements inside the macOS we use today.
    Watch more of the NeXTWorld Expo: wp.me/p3bVYq-7z
    FACEBOOK PAGE: / computerclan
    WEBSITE: thecomputerclan.com
    TWITTER: / thecomputerclan
    Follow Ken: @Hildron101010
    Film gear Ken uses: amzn.to/2hmJhHU
    On a lower budget? Try some of these products: amzn.to/2hLrJBL
    COMPUTER CLAN MEMBERS INVOLVED IN THIS VIDEO
    Ken (Hildron101010)
    Marin Exley (PolestarDesign)
    Amazon links are powered by the Amazon Associates Program.
    #AppleProductHistoryCC #ComputerClan
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 534

  • @morezco
    @morezco 6 років тому +340

    “If we were doing this on a mac we’d be waiting til next week for the windows to repaint”
    holy shit Jobs

    • @TotallyLazlo
      @TotallyLazlo 4 роки тому +1

      E

    • @dbloyd2
      @dbloyd2 4 роки тому +12

      It would be funny to do a demo of Windows Vista on an old PC and a screen capture of this with Steve Jobs comment in the audio track.

    • @milkshakeplease4696
      @milkshakeplease4696 4 роки тому +6

      Jobs: iPhone runs MAC OS X.
      People in the crowd: WOOT WOOT YES BABY. WE SUPPRESS THE TRUTH OF GOD AND BELIEVE IN SOCOIOPATHIC DARWINISM THUS WE DECIDE TO WORSHIP YOU, Steve Jobs.
      lame

    • @surprisedpotato
      @surprisedpotato 4 роки тому +6

      Sam H over-religious anyone?

    • @bgimusic
      @bgimusic 3 роки тому

      @jo gr stop

  • @janrusthaug6254
    @janrusthaug6254 4 роки тому +252

    I've. been using a Mac since 2002. Just found out I have Chess installed.

    • @bum4202
      @bum4202 4 роки тому +1

      LLOL

    • @tinmank
      @tinmank 4 роки тому +1

      Jan Rusthaug same here :D i just checked i have chess :D

    • @georgediama
      @georgediama 4 роки тому +3

      holy crap there's chess preinstalled. I was more impressed with this grapher app tho, it's so useful and cool

    • @iMonZ00
      @iMonZ00 4 роки тому +1

      Why i don’t have Chess on MacOS 11?

    • @fanosup
      @fanosup 4 роки тому

      🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @amberdean1263
    @amberdean1263 6 років тому +44

    This is wonderful - thank you for delving into vintage technology. It's important that we keep the history alive.

    • @ComputerClan
      @ComputerClan  6 років тому +1

      Thank you. We'll be delving into more soon, so stick around. If you liked this, you'll like what we've got in store ; )

  • @mattl_
    @mattl_ 7 років тому +49

    NS stands for NeXT/Sun from the OpenStep specification. NX was the previous version, from NeXTSTEP

  • @compactc9
    @compactc9 6 років тому +205

    Really the whole core of OS X came from NeXT, Apple was having so much trouble with a replacement for OS 9 that the basically gave NeXT's OS a facelift, but the Unix core of it was what they were really after.

    • @MaddTheSane
      @MaddTheSane 5 років тому +7

      compactc9 Mac OS 9? No, Mac OS 7. Copland was meant to *be* Mac OS 8. Apple botched the development by tacking too many features on it.

    • @robinandthedog
      @robinandthedog 4 роки тому +10

      The race was between BeOS and NeXT, NeXT won and in hint-side it is maybe better history went this way.

    • @eknuds
      @eknuds 4 роки тому +2

      @@MaddTheSane yeah, "Feature Creep" or "Moving the Goal Posts" in Silicon Valley parlance. Major product management faux pas, and a company killer. As it almost did with Apple.

    • @Charlesb88
      @Charlesb88 4 роки тому +9

      Madd the Sane The two big issue with Copeland were that they tried to bring much needed features like Protected Memory to the OS while still maintaining backwards compatibility with older apps and feature creep. The former proved much harder to do then anticipated. Secondly, they tacked too many features on (aka feature creep) which also caused the OS to be too unstable. Eventually they realized that the only way forward was to either make a PPC version of MS Windows the default OS on Mac or purchase another OS outright and adapt it into a new version of MacOS. Fortunately, they cam to there senses regarding putting Windows 95 on Macs as the loyal Mac fan base would have started a riot if they did that. So they decide instead to look into either buying the BeOS or NextStep OS and adapting it and fortunately, the ended up buying Next and taking Steve Jobs back as their interim CEO (later permanent). They solved the backwards compatibility thing buy including a virtual machine running OS 9 inside the OS X (called the Classic environment). They solved the fact that they need an OS 8 in the meantime while they developed OS X by adopting some of the features intended to be in Copeland to much so-called back update of OS 7 as well as giving the OS 8 a facelift (much like how the overly ambitious MS Longhorn had to be scaled back into the much less ambitious Vista).
      OS 8 & 9 still had some nice features added though, but since it merely was a scaled back upgrade of OS 7, it still suffered from the issue of any app crashing crashing the whole system to crash (due to the lack of protected memory) and the screwy way you had to predefine each apps memory allotment before launching due to the lack of good memory management. Of course, Windows 95 was a very buggy OS too and I can recall countless times I had to deal with apps crashing and blue screen’s of death much more I cared too.. (Both OS X and XP where bth much better in this regard, though OS X suffered from fewer kernel panics vs XP, for me at least.

    • @astroboy2345
      @astroboy2345 4 роки тому +5

      @@robinandthedog Steve Jobs went back to Apple from Next. Of course he is going with NextSTEP OS. But let history shows that BeOS was pretty awesome. To bad it didn't have the opportunity to take off.

  • @BrianBoniMakes
    @BrianBoniMakes 7 років тому +86

    Nice video, brings back lots of memories. I used many NeXT systems and went to the seminars and had the training, from a professional standpoint the systems were the best deal in computing at the time. Notice I used the word professional, these systems were for business, science and education and no where do I remember them marketing them for home use so comparing the price to the PC junk of the day would be useless. A better comparison would be to other high end unix systems and by that measure NeXT were a steal.
    Some of the features of NeXT were so useful we bought machines that just did one thing all day long, for years. That example of the screen redraw, we had a system setup to preview postscript on a large gray scale display, that's all it did and it paid for itself within a few months and lasted for years, now that's value. Many manufacturers of machines included NeXT computers with their machines because it was so easy to develop powerful software with them, many of the NeXT machines that came into my shop actually came as the controller for a much larger machine.
    You mention the interface builder that came with the system, a compiler also came with the system, I don't remember any version of windows that came with a full development kit. The APP and the object along with the interface builder allowed you to create your own applications that used functions from any of the software you had loaded on the machine. In other words you could pull data off a number of servers, save dump it in a spreadsheet, massage the data in Mathematica, image it with Illustrator and display the results in Framemaker and wrap the whole thing up to look like you created a application all in a couple of minutes, nothing else at the time could do this. Another thing you don't get with a computer today is support, I had the phone number of a NeXT engineer that I could call directly and he'd help me and if he couldn't help he'd talk to someone and they would call me back usually within a couple of hours, what's that worth?
    You also didn't mention the shaking head password fail response.

    • @Cenot4ph
      @Cenot4ph 10 місяців тому +2

      I guess you've pointed at the main weakness of next systems, that it wasn't for home use.

    • @mikem9536
      @mikem9536 9 місяців тому

      Yep, as a consumer product, NextOS was a failure.@@Cenot4ph

  • @GamerChris123
    @GamerChris123 6 років тому +47

    It’s strange hearing Steve Jobs dis the Mac when not working at Apple.

  • @MajurathanS
    @MajurathanS 6 років тому +32

    I used to feel bad for having code in my app that's a year old...this video is reassuring

  • @coryplum5375
    @coryplum5375 6 років тому +71

    Yes, macOS X was NextSTEP's son.

  • @EddyGraphic
    @EddyGraphic 6 років тому +235

    Lol Jobs roasted his original company 🤣😂

  • @AlexTechie
    @AlexTechie 7 років тому +104

    Spoiler alert: every time he asks, "sound familiar?", that means it carried over to Mac.

    • @KingNothing22
      @KingNothing22 6 років тому +4

      Duh, He explains Right after

    • @Locutus
      @Locutus 6 років тому +2

      It didn't carry over. OSX is Next OS. Next OS was slapped with an Apple logo and UI over it.

  • @mylesl2890
    @mylesl2890 4 роки тому +9

    was lucky enough to have a NeXT machine when they first came out, was so amazing and so much fun i can't even describe it, still have it still works loads of fun to reminise

  • @brianh2771
    @brianh2771 6 років тому +52

    Nice video. It's not just features and design that came over from NeXTSTEP. OS X is the evolution of the same OS. It never died, and iOS is a NeXT descendent too. Also worth noting is that the World Wide Web was first developed on NeXT, as was id Software's DOOM.

    • @GaryBusey-sLaserdiscCollection
      @GaryBusey-sLaserdiscCollection 6 років тому +4

      If Doom was devved on a NeXT rig which use 68040 CPUs at best then why does it run like ass on 68060 Amigas?

    • @1337penguinman
      @1337penguinman 6 років тому +6

      Optimized for PCs since that was going to be the primary market for it. However, the fact it was developed cross platform made porting relatively simple. That and the engine being open sourced is why Doom can run on effectively anything.

    • @Enigmatism415
      @Enigmatism415 6 років тому +11

      So what you're saying is, it was the Macintosh Classic OS that died and NeXTSTEP usurped its name.

    • @BrianWardPlus
      @BrianWardPlus 4 роки тому +3

      @@Enigmatism415 Yes, this is *exactly* what happened. That's what Classic and Carbon APIs being end-of-lifed was all about: A transition to give people a chance to jump ship before the Classic Mac OS boat sank.

    • @Enigmatism415
      @Enigmatism415 4 роки тому +3

      @@BrianWardPlus So what we call Macintosh in the 21st century isn't really Macintosh at all, just better versions of NeXT software wearing a Macintosh name-tag for nostalgia and brand recognition...

  • @ianzen
    @ianzen 4 роки тому +41

    Kinda funny hearing Steve talk shit about the Mac at that point in time.

    • @StevenEveral
      @StevenEveral 4 роки тому +6

      Considering how Sculley fired Jobs from Apple, it's not all that surprising.

    • @northwindkey
      @northwindkey Місяць тому

      @@StevenEveral Also cause Apple was really misusing the brand at the time. By the early 90s they had like 10 models that all had confusing specs and confusing target demos. Not to mention Apple kept trying to break into the corporate space that Wintel had already owned and won. When Jobs came back, Apple finally stopped trying to get the business demo. They acknowledged Microsoft had won there, and instead focused on education and creative markets.

  • @Erik_The_Viking
    @Erik_The_Viking Рік тому +3

    Lovely memories of NeXTStep - I used those computers in undergrad. Loved them! Most people don't realize how much of Mac OSX comes from that OS.

    • @technite5360
      @technite5360 7 місяців тому +2

      And most probably inspired w95

  • @GerhardAEUhlhorn
    @GerhardAEUhlhorn 4 роки тому +8

    And all the stuff was made in Display Postscript! Every window, every menu was Display Postscript! It was possible to send anything from the screen directly to the Postscript printer.
    In macOS the screen is now Display PDF.

  • @BilisNegra
    @BilisNegra 6 років тому +10

    1:15 64 megs of RAM and 2 Gb disk drive are killer specs for a 486 era computer! Well, that machine must have been obscenely expensive.

  • @PeterRichardsandYoureNot
    @PeterRichardsandYoureNot 4 роки тому +9

    Best part of next was how it was built on postscript. At the time when desktop publishing was a print media end game this was huge to bring print consistency from screen to printer.

    • @rcnhsuailsnyfiue2
      @rcnhsuailsnyfiue2 10 місяців тому

      RIP PostScript 🙏🏻 macOS Sonoma has just deprecated it... Sad times 😢

  • @TheJamieRamone
    @TheJamieRamone 7 років тому +60

    NS stands for NeXT-SUN, not NEXTSTEP. That's because that prefix is exclusive to OPENSTEP, developed by NeXT and SUN in 94. Before that, they used NX for the API.

    •  4 роки тому +1

      OPENSTEP is still aviable by GNUStep. MacOS is still based on this but new advancements were closed.

    • @nikitakipriyanov7260
      @nikitakipriyanov7260 4 роки тому +1

      @ One is that see WindowMaker and you'll see it looks like GNUStep. Which looks like OpenStep. Which loosk like NeXTStep. But it feels differently, for example, menus, while look the same, work other way and so on.

  • @dustindowney_
    @dustindowney_ 7 років тому

    This is a GREAT video, thanks for taking the time to put it together!!!

  • @37Kilo2
    @37Kilo2 2 роки тому +1

    Cool video. The 80s to early 00s was an awesome time to be a computer nerd. There was so much innovation, and wonder. Now everything made is geared toward ad delivery.

  • @ColonialPuppet
    @ColonialPuppet 7 років тому +28

    lol that ball in break out looks like a nod to amiga's bouncing red ball

  • @irata2006
    @irata2006 5 років тому +4

    If you opened that welcome message in an actual NeXT machine it had a voice message from Steve himself.

  • @johnsim3722
    @johnsim3722 4 роки тому +5

    So much of what you showed with NeXTSTEP was already on the Acorn Achimedes with its RISC OS. It was a fully 32-bit OS that came in the late 80s, and as the name suggests using a RISC processor. You'll know that as the ARM processor, which you've probably got in your phone. So really it was Acorn who set the look for Next and is also powering just about every smart phone on the planet!

    • @supercellex4D
      @supercellex4D 9 місяців тому +1

      ironic considering now macs use desktop Arm chips just like the Archimedes was.

    • @johnsim3722
      @johnsim3722 9 місяців тому

      @@supercellex4D Indeed! ARM has gone full circle back to the desktop! Macs have gone from using Motorola chips to Intel to ARM. That's quite incredible that they've been able to change platforms like that.
      How the x86 platform has developed through to the Core processors today I'm not sure they've been able to full drop previous compatibility. Can you still run DOS and DOS programs if you could get it to boot? Yes, I know Windows now emulates DOS.
      At the same time, so many other processors have disappeared from the workstation market. HP PA-RISC has gone, but it used to be a very stable platform with HP-UX. Far better than Windows almost never requiring reboot. SPARC processors are gone almost, but interestingly are now being used in Aerospace applications were they've been radiation hardened. ESA have an approved design for satellites.
      But the ARM processor has only gone from strength to strength and much of that has to be attributed not just to Sophie Wilson, Steve Furber but also Robin Saxby who seen the potential and kept pushing the product and business model of licensing out the design without producing any silicon themselves.

    • @northwindkey
      @northwindkey Місяць тому +1

      @@johnsim3722 Because CISC Architectures are a dead end. What's funny is Apple knew that in the early 90s, when they jumped to PowerPC and knew Intel had an expiration date. Unfortunately IBM kinda screwed up the development of PowerPC and by the mid-2000s Apple needed to get away from PowerPC fast, so they just jumped to Intel since they were the easiest choice at the time. But now Apple has moved to Silicon because, again, CISC was a dead end. Anyone who's ever tried writing x86 assembly can tell you how much of a clusterfuck the architecture is.

    • @johnsim3722
      @johnsim3722 Місяць тому

      @@northwindkey And Acorn realised it in the 80s, hence why they invented the ARM processor (See Sophie Wilson and Steve Furber). I did x86 assembler a long time ago. Done various processors, mainly microcontrollers in recent times though.

  • @ryanjameshope
    @ryanjameshope 4 роки тому

    This was very cool to see the roots of the operating system I love to use today :) thanks for this!

  • @tambovskya
    @tambovskya 6 років тому +1

    Cool to know each feature in detail.

  • @nazmulbhuiyan7304
    @nazmulbhuiyan7304 4 роки тому +1

    This is so nostalgic. Took me back to my university days. And now I am feeling ancient.

  • @MegaManNeo
    @MegaManNeo 7 років тому +62

    This actually makes NeXTStep more awesome than OSX nowadays.
    But it's also sad that technology was so expensive back then, this would have been mind blowing to use instead of DOS and Windows3.11.

    • @jcfawerd
      @jcfawerd 7 років тому +11

      At least, we can enjoy one of the greatest invention that this system helps to build - WWW

    • @PhantomWorksStudios
      @PhantomWorksStudios 7 років тому +1

      well heres a question as well, what if nextos took over instead of osx and what would of happened if it continued to evolve from the late 80s? I always wondered that :/

    • @Hans-gb4mv
      @Hans-gb4mv 6 років тому +4

      Fact is, it didn't. NeXT was running into financial issues (just like Apple was) because the machines became to expensive and the software took much longer to develop. The same issue that basically had Apple take Jobs off the Lisa project and ultimatelt fired him for for doing it on the Macintosh project was also causing his new company to struggle.

    • @martinandreaskruse4446
      @martinandreaskruse4446 6 років тому +7

      Mac OS X IS NextOS...

    • @alvallac2171
      @alvallac2171 5 років тому +1

      @@PhantomWorksStudios *would've (contraction of "WOULD haVE")

  • @nickhimes2736
    @nickhimes2736 2 роки тому +1

    Plus people usually don't mention this but NeXTStep also gave us the world wide web, tim Berners-Lee made the first web page on NS. Along with the first app store or at least a forerunner to the app store

  • @mgabrysSF
    @mgabrysSF 5 років тому +3

    The menus were pretty handy - not only could they be placed anywhere - but sub-menus could be 'torn off' and also placed elsewhere. The method was similar to Irix which ran on SGI workstations around the same time. This meant you didn't have to constantly scroll to the top of the screen - handy on large monitors - which would have been particularly nice today if it had been transferred into the macOS / OSX. Apple's acquisition of NeXT has been often cited as a 'reverse merger' since - besides Steve Jobs taking control - most of the principal people at NeXT took leadership roles in Apple and the Apple board was replaced.

  • @paulussantosociwidjaja4781
    @paulussantosociwidjaja4781 6 років тому

    Wow, thank you for sharing this "memories are made of these!".

  • @joeylantis22
    @joeylantis22 6 років тому +1

    This is an AWESOME video! More like this please! Subscribed.

  • @xcript123
    @xcript123 7 років тому +4

    This OS was way advanced on its time...Nowadays MacOS looks so similar to this one. Really pretty & sleek design.

  • @BenkArtist
    @BenkArtist 6 років тому +4

    great video! I'd previously only seen stills of NexTSTEP.
    Note: Mac OS7-9 and possibly earlier had the 'hide' application feature. It was found by clicking the application name on the top right of the screen. :)

  • @teddiecrash8216
    @teddiecrash8216 2 роки тому

    Today iam 48y old. First time i saw NextStep i was flashed like the Acorn in the 80s. Never had so much money to buy this stuff. Had an Atari ST & Amiga. But i like to see videos about the old days. Nice. Thank you. The Voiceover is great.

  • @RobertHana
    @RobertHana 4 роки тому +1

    Objective-C! ... and now many elements shared w/ iOS! And I've worked on (and am STILL working on) WebObjects! FREAKIN AWESOME STUFF!

  • @kaitsurugi3280
    @kaitsurugi3280 4 роки тому +1

    So interesting! Thanks for the history comparison!

  • @matthewstott3493
    @matthewstott3493 2 роки тому +2

    The technology from NeXT has been Apple's secret weapon since Apple bought NeXT. It is what led to the iPhone & iPad. It is why BlackBerry and Android struggled to compete. It is how Apple was able to switch architectures several times on mobile and from PowerPC to Intel and now Intel to Apple Silicon. The NeXT development environment was decades ahead of the competition. They had the very first object oriented graphical rapid application design environment which predated VisualBasic and others. Previously, developers had to draw their graphical interfaces on graph paper and manually calculate the X, Y coordinates to position and size a window, button, other controls on screen. Then code those values directly in source code. NeXT allowed you to quickly draw those controls on screen and make connections by dragging and dropping connection points and create code to make the control object do something. This was truly revolutionary. Objective-C was essentially C with smalltalk like object orientated features. Smalltalk had some basic GUI but NeXT took it to a whole other level.

  • @wilwad
    @wilwad 6 років тому

    Thoroughly enjoyed this. Thank you!

  • @Cinicraft00
    @Cinicraft00 5 років тому +1

    All classes you program in Xcode using objective-c still have the NextStep abbreviation in all class names. Strings are called NSString, object base classes are called NSObject, NSNotificationCenter, etc...

  • @chindall
    @chindall 4 роки тому +1

    Good job! I actually bought a next cube of eBay so years ago. When I powered it on the lights dimmed. One of the reasons I use macOS to this day is because of what is running in the background a UNIX Lenix like terminal.

  • @TheCocoaDaddy
    @TheCocoaDaddy 4 роки тому

    Great video! A friend of mine owned a NeXT workstation and I just loved the NeXTSTEP UI. For a while, I ran the "AfterStep" window manager on Linux, just to have the NeXTSTEP UI available. :) Thanks for posting!

  • @RobertBaskette
    @RobertBaskette 6 років тому +2

    The black and white beach ball is actually the disk icon for the magneto-optical drive on the original cube. This over time morphed into the beach ball as it lost its context. Wikipedia has the some great icons showing the progression: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spinning_pinwheel

  • @TheCracker94
    @TheCracker94 4 роки тому +1

    Extremely interesting, thank you!

  • @theodricaethelfrith
    @theodricaethelfrith 6 років тому +3

    Random titbit: the spinning CD wait cursor from NeXTSTEP made it way into OS X as well, but was replaced with the current "beach ball" starting with 10.2

    • @ComputerClan
      @ComputerClan  6 років тому +3

      Ah, yes. It did resemble more of a CD. A recent macOS major release replaced the 10.2 beachball, however.

  • @seanc.5310
    @seanc.5310 6 років тому +6

    Awesome video! I knew that Apple bought NeXTSTEP after Jobs came back but I hadn't known how much of the tech was plugged into Mac OS.

    • @tasosalexiadis7748
      @tasosalexiadis7748 2 роки тому +1

      Basically all modern continuations of macOS (from Mac OS X onwards) are continuations of NextStep as all modern Windows OSes are continuations of Windows NT.

  • @adam872
    @adam872 3 роки тому

    NeXTSTEP was incredible for the time. It still looks pretty fresh now. I lusted after one of the workstations for the longest time.

  • @TheKevphil
    @TheKevphil 6 років тому

    Very cool! Thanks for the info.

  • @paytondev
    @paytondev 2 роки тому +1

    I’m a developer and I’ve always wondered what NS meant in Xcode. Crazy that it means NextStep!

  • @peymanx
    @peymanx 4 роки тому +1

    I installed and run GNUStep which is based on NEXTSTEP
    great video... great job!

  • @CloveCoast
    @CloveCoast Рік тому +1

    mind-blowingly ahead of its time

  • @irata2006
    @irata2006 6 років тому +2

    That “Welcome” message on the NeXT mail app has a short voice message from Steve Jobs himself.

  • @MukBh
    @MukBh 2 роки тому

    NextStep was such an inspiration, I had written a complete set of controls for MS Windows to make them look like NSObjects.

  • @ronaldhavlin
    @ronaldhavlin 5 років тому

    super great video thanks

  • @AndyAgus1
    @AndyAgus1 6 років тому

    Amazing video

  • @ITzTravelInTime
    @ITzTravelInTime 6 років тому +6

    you should try apple rasphody, which was the beginning of mac os x after next step was bougth by apple, and it's truly a mix of next step and os x, and it also has an official pc relese that could run on a non apple pc

  • @morsikpl
    @morsikpl 4 роки тому

    Quite a history! Thanks for this video!

  • @8randomprettysecret8
    @8randomprettysecret8 7 місяців тому

    Cool thanks for sharing!

  • @MinecraftMarioFantheAnimator
    @MinecraftMarioFantheAnimator 7 років тому +5

    Finally a good video in ages, thank you

    • @ComputerClan
      @ComputerClan  7 років тому +1

      Are you saying we haven't made a good video in a long time??? :c :c :c

    • @MinecraftMarioFantheAnimator
      @MinecraftMarioFantheAnimator 7 років тому

      Like I said, your videos aren't the amazement they were back in the day.
      I really miss the old days, please bring them back.

    • @ComputerClan
      @ComputerClan  7 років тому +2

      You're going to have to be more specific than that x3

    • @MinecraftMarioFantheAnimator
      @MinecraftMarioFantheAnimator 7 років тому

      Look back before 2015 ;)
      Oh, and SpoofOS was funny as hell, I'd love to see more of that

    • @ComputerClan
      @ComputerClan  7 років тому +1

      Was it _just_ Spoof OS?

  • @abdulazizalserhani7625
    @abdulazizalserhani7625 5 років тому +2

    Did you know John Carmack of id Software used a NeXT computer to first develop Doom and Quake?

    • @ComputerClan
      @ComputerClan  5 років тому +1

      Did he really? Seems like a lot of groundbreaking things were made on NeXT.

  • @MemorieMusic
    @MemorieMusic 4 роки тому +3

    Ken, you missed one thing , the icon of me folder in NextStep is a house similar to the user in the Mac OS

  • @HazyJ28
    @HazyJ28 3 роки тому

    I am still blown away by how far ahead of its time Next was

  •  7 років тому +4

    you sound like Lewis from unboxtherapy XD nice video btw

  • @MrBionicl
    @MrBionicl 7 років тому

    Great video!

    • @Piipperi800
      @Piipperi800 7 років тому +1

      Maciej 'Bionicl' Maj heyy i know your games

  • @justinhall3243
    @justinhall3243 Рік тому

    I was a beta tester for Mac OS X, this brings back memories.

  • @Taras-Nabad
    @Taras-Nabad 8 місяців тому

    Great video

  • @Cyba_IT_NZ
    @Cyba_IT_NZ 6 років тому +8

    Love how salty Steve sounded.

  • @ag4eng
    @ag4eng 4 роки тому +1

    Ahead of it’s time, can wait for macOS 11.

  • @parker_aug2
    @parker_aug2 6 років тому +1

    Great vid! I just wish you showed it in 4:3 instead of all stretched out. I wouldn't have minded the black bars on the sides.

  • @NSResponder
    @NSResponder 5 років тому +1

    The "NS" prefix is usually assumed to stand for NeXTSTEP, but at the time it was introduced, you could ask different people at NeXT what it stood for, and get various answers including "NeXT-Sun" (since they were working together on bringing OpenStep to Solaris), or even "Neat Stuff". There was never any official statement on the matter.
    -jcr

  • @Zakalwe-01
    @Zakalwe-01 7 років тому +67

    There's that Jobs presentation when he asks 'what is the next step? OSX is the next step'. You can hear a smattering of laughter in the audience. Begs the question: did Apple really survive it's problems in the 90s, or was it actually covertly acquired by NextStep and robbed of its name? Hmmm...

    • @vraiverifiableinvisiblekta2887
      @vraiverifiableinvisiblekta2887 7 років тому +7

      Apple did not survive and was helped by microsoft in 1997 and it helped a lot to port Rapshody to i386 and Next Step/i386 to powerpc ... Apple sells phones not computers

    • @stevey500
      @stevey500 7 років тому +10

      Apple sets the standard of computing, lawls. Look at Windows 10, it was released with zero features and these updates that are constantly being developed after the fact are slowly catching it up to what Mac OS X has been for decades. Granted, Windows 10 does have a few small tidbits that they've ventured on their own (finally) but still, as a user of all the systems in depth, yes, Apple makes the computer the way computing should be, others slowly have reflected, very thankfully.

    • @justrant
      @justrant 6 років тому +11

      Apple's worst times were in the 90s.

    • @777jones
      @777jones 6 років тому +13

      Technologically, NeXt was the successor to Apple Computer. Apple acquired NeXt, re-branded it as “new Apple products” and shut all the legacy Apple stuff down. The only valuable part was the Apple logo and Next technology. Apple was technologically failing and dying.

    • @utubeavid
      @utubeavid 6 років тому +4

      Starting from 1997, Apple didn't sell computers at at all.. They sold home appliances that were passed off as computers. Also, every Mac OS version starting from OS X 10.4 is a pile of crap.

  • @ThinkCleverAndSmart
    @ThinkCleverAndSmart 7 років тому +1

    That is extremely similar! :D

  • @borisstaudt9158
    @borisstaudt9158 4 роки тому

    Good Job

  • @northwindkey
    @northwindkey Місяць тому

    Fun fact: According to Steve Jobs, the OS is actually not called NeXTSTEP. It's actually called "Mach OS" since it's a combination of the Mach Kernel and BSD. Think of how "Linux OS" is usually referring to the combination of Linux and GNU. NeXTSTEP is not the OS, but rather, the platform consisting of the OS and its API layers and applications. Eventually, the two were separated off and the APIs were renamed "Openstep" and the OG NeXTSTEP became "Openstep For Mach", to differentiate it from versions of Openstep that ran on top of Windows NT and other systems.

  • @hikaru-live
    @hikaru-live 6 років тому +19

    This might be a bit of a stretch as the earliest Mac OS X builds used kernel versions 1-3 (as can be seen using uname command,) but the final, stable-ish version of Mac OS X 10.0 had a kernel version of 4, and each subsequent version of macOS had a kernel version number 4 greater than the OS's own version number. The last public version of NeXTSTEP was version 3.3. This got me thinking - is macOS kernel version really just a continuation of NeXTSTEP? Is macOS 10.13 High Sierra really NeXTSTEP version 17?

    • @darth_kal-el
      @darth_kal-el 5 років тому +3

      陈北宗 NextStep was the foundation of Mac OS. It is what it was based on. Trying to suggest otherwise shows you don’t know about tech or Apple.

    • @TheDanielLivingston
      @TheDanielLivingston 4 роки тому +1

      That’s a really interesting thought. I would imagine that you’re correct. The macOS kernel is called XNU. From Wikipedia:
      “After Apple acquired NeXT, the Mach component was upgraded to OSFMK 7.3 from OSF,[2] the BSD components were upgraded with code from the FreeBSD project, and the Driver Kit was replaced with a C++ API for writing drivers named I/O Kit.”

    • @TheDanielLivingston
      @TheDanielLivingston 4 роки тому +2

      Also, read up on this; en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darwin_(operating_system)

    • @jscorpio1987
      @jscorpio1987 4 роки тому +2

      Cory Weston they literally kept the same exact code base and redesigned a good chunk of the UI. OS X really is just NeXTSTEP with a prettier interface.

    • @TheDanielLivingston
      @TheDanielLivingston 4 роки тому +1

      @@jscorpio1987 It's not OS X anymore, it's OS 11 ;)

  • @lattermanstudio
    @lattermanstudio 7 років тому

    Excellent

  • @vaalrus
    @vaalrus 6 років тому +33

    “Inspired by”? …It Was a Port.

  • @richardkoerper1630
    @richardkoerper1630 7 років тому

    Very nice, been telling people this for years.

  • @ispanish
    @ispanish 7 років тому

    Love it ken

  • @alessandrozara924
    @alessandrozara924 Рік тому

    Actually there are also 2 other things of NeXTSTEP that were adapted to Mac OS X. The menu window of NeXTSTEP became the menu bar of Mac OS X (in Mac OS Classic it was similar but it didn't include the name of the software if I remember well) while the other thing of NeXTSTEP that came to Mac OS X is a web browser called OmniWeb. In fact the team who produced this browser, the Omni Group, first released it for NeXTSTEP then, after Apple acquired NeXT, OmniWeb was changed into a web browser for Mac OS X.

  • @peymanx
    @peymanx 6 років тому

    Goodjob

  • @pmgodfrey
    @pmgodfrey 4 роки тому

    We had NeXTSTEP running on Intel machines in 1996 when I did IT work for South Western Bell Mobile Systems. Could have been version 3.3. Had boxes and boxes of the operating system discs. Might still have a set of them somewhere.

  • @Minecraft101ToonLink
    @Minecraft101ToonLink 7 років тому +3

    Wow!!! I did NOT know what the NS stood for in Xcode, but it ALL MAKES SENSE now! 😂

    • @ComputerClan
      @ComputerClan  7 років тому +1

      When re-researching it, I've heard some people say it's Next-Sun and some say it's NeXTSTEP. So either, I suppose. : )

    • @Minecraft101ToonLink
      @Minecraft101ToonLink 7 років тому

      Computer Clan - WHAT? The CC actually replied!?! Amazing!
      But really, Next-Sun? How does THAT make sense???

    • @ComputerClan
      @ComputerClan  7 років тому +1

      Sun, as in Sun Microsystems, Inc.

    • @MaddTheSane
      @MaddTheSane 6 років тому

      Sun Microsystems (the people responsible for creating Java) went into a partnership or asked NeXT to make a NeXTStep-like UI/Developer Tools without the NeXT kernel. IIRC, Sun ended up ditching NeXT for whatever reason, but the new APIs (those that begin with NS) became a part of OpenStep.
      Fun Fact: you can still find some APIs with the NX prefix. I know IOKit has a few.

  • @deckard2665
    @deckard2665 6 років тому +1

    Nice video. I remember when these computers came to market I was around 13 years old but I remember being very impressed even as a 13 year old. I read somewhere that Bill Gates thought that the Next Step OS was not impressive and that it was just a warmed over Unix system with a GUI. I still find that hard to believe. I mean that Next System was so much more advanced then what Gates had at the time with Windows 3.1 and DOS. Of course the price of the Next and its target audience were altogether different. Still though If I could ask Gates one question, it would be "did you really think the Next system was just a warmed over version of Unix?" Wonder if his response would be the same.

  • @gavinthecrafter
    @gavinthecrafter 7 років тому +1

    This guy deserves 10 times the subscribers

  • @JustWasted3HoursHere
    @JustWasted3HoursHere 6 років тому +4

    Later versions of NextStep were also available for 486 computers.
    Funny how Steve was fired from Apple, started Next, got into financial trouble (the systems cost $9999 or $6499 with education discount), went back to Apple and then bought Next (getting him out of a financial pickle).
    Next may have succeeded if they had been able (or willing...) to sell the the system for a reasonable price. After all, it only had a Motorola 68040 running at 33 mhz in it. Fast, but not CRAZY fast (some Amigas and even Atari STs had that, and at higher clockspeed too!) But Steve was used to overpricing things (look at Apple products even today) and just assumed that people would buy it no matter what, as long as his name was attached to it.

    • @TheyRiseBand
      @TheyRiseBand 5 років тому

      BeOS and NEXTSTEP were both in the running as a replacement for the outdated Classic MacOS. NeXT was just farther along, functionally, so they were selected. Scully bought NeXT and got Jobs as a bonus. The whole cofounder thing, return of the prodigal son, and all...

    • @TheSteveSteele
      @TheSteveSteele 5 років тому

      TheyRiseBand Sculley was long gone. Michael Spindler replaced Sculley as CEO but didn’t last long. Gil Amelio replaced him and was the CEO who watched the BeOS vs NeXT demos. Be had a very strong beta-OS running on a dual 603 PPC system called a BeBox (I had one), and Gil took Be very seriously, but Gasse, thinking Apple was desperate (or maybe he knew he stood no chance against Steve), wanted too much and didn’t impress, while NeXT offered a much more mature environment and came with Steve Jobs.

    • @brodriguez11000
      @brodriguez11000 3 роки тому

      You're seeing two things. One in answer to the question,"what happens when a perfectionist runs a computer company", and the larger, "what dynamics does one get when 'good enough' meets 'not good enough'" aka the whole IBM PC/Windows saga vs Macintosh?

  • @iwanttocomplain
    @iwanttocomplain 4 роки тому

    The Next systems also introduces soft power on and network power control.

  • @ColonelLucario
    @ColonelLucario 3 роки тому

    It’s interesting to see where all those macOS features come from
    Curious to see the sale thing with Windows, if there are

  • @bitterseeds
    @bitterseeds 11 місяців тому

    heh. I use to dual boot NeXTStep for Intel and OS/2. Yeah, it was an exciting time and so much fun.

  • @mortenthorpe
    @mortenthorpe Рік тому

    “While he was away from Apple”… a very kind, albeit twisted representation of events… He was thrown out of Apple, and only in its most dire darkest hours, did Apple relent and elect Steve to be (Interim) CEO.. The fact that he had apparently grown up a bit in the timespan of 12-14 years between his Apple stints, showed clearly upon his return, as the company stabilized and focused

  • @ThnkCmdyFeelTrgdy
    @ThnkCmdyFeelTrgdy 3 роки тому

    Back in 1992 I used NeXT Step, which had already been out for 3 years. I built an Intel system to run it, at the time it was demanding. This was at a time when the minimum 16 MB RAM cost $1600, the 1.2 GB HDD and SCSSI controller card cost $2000, and then the 486 CPU and MB and rest... around $4-5K in early 90's. But it was so worth it. Way ahead DOS/Windows 3.1, OS2, and Linux was still more or less Linus Torvalds. Oh great, I'm just had an image of being Grandpa Simpson... with my rambling on Ren & Stimpy and Beavis & Butthead... where was I... oh yeqh, thanks for the video, great trip down memory lane. Truly Steve Jobs was a visionary, that his ideas and designs still live on is incredible. One must also give a shout out to Xerox Park of the 70's and 80's and how fortuitous Steve's visit to them was back then.

  • @BrianWardPlus
    @BrianWardPlus 7 років тому +1

    holy shit! that icon is still in macOS. :D

  • @leeanucha
    @leeanucha 6 років тому +1

    very cool video. glad to see the legacy of next os still being use today with latest mac os. even though apple sucks nowadays. thanks.

  • @jonvincentmusic
    @jonvincentmusic 5 років тому +1

    1:55 'It was so advanced for the time, no one had seen this technology before". Two words: Commodore Amiga.

    • @ComputerClan
      @ComputerClan  5 років тому

      That's why I said "basically". ; )

  • @SriHarshaChilakapati
    @SriHarshaChilakapati 6 років тому +1

    I did see a kinda similar video showing System OS 7 and thought that these apps we see today are from it. Now this, are from 1980's??

  • @bgimusic
    @bgimusic 3 роки тому

    pretty cool!!

  • @henrykoplien1007
    @henrykoplien1007 5 років тому +1

    Yep, everything right. And still love Nextstep..

  • @htx80nerd
    @htx80nerd 4 місяці тому

    Amazing

  • @kalaskrille
    @kalaskrille 7 років тому

    Brilliant video. But seriously mate, can you link the wallpaper at 5:39, please!?

  • @theharbingerofconflation
    @theharbingerofconflation 4 роки тому

    Damn I remember trying to get Openstep to run on i386 what a pain everything was back then