Nice work! You kept it lively and did a rigorous job showing us how your chosen quantum system exists in its lowest allowed quantum state given its size, symetry and mass distribution. I am curious to know how two identical such systems would interact.
I wish that I had access to your teaching when I was in uni studying this. I remember studying this in year 1 and 2 and thinking what the hell os going on! But your way is great. Thank you
I thought that would come. 🤓 How deep do you want to go? Derivation of time independent is fairly straight forward. To do one can be on my to do list but to be fair there are a few videos out there that do a great job already.
@@PhysicsHigh I for one would really much like to see somewhere decent explanation on how gamma radiation is released by electron going from higher energy state to lower energy state. With accent on how negatively charged particle (electron) releases gamma radiation which does not have nor mass nor electric charge. Thank you
You can say that in a sense. The nature of standing waves is that they are in resonance and thus have discrete energy levels. That’s is true for orbitals. But their shape is a probability ‘map’ and not a physical reality.
We had learned a certain form of the Schrodingers Equation that included Partial Differentiation. Whats the difference between the one mentioned in the video and the one I had mentioned ?
theres no difference really unless you go into 3D problems, as you can see in this case the schrodinger's equation work with 1D problems only so partial and normal derivatives are the same
Thanks. That depends on what aspect. The actual video and editing took maybe 4-5 hours in total. But in this one I spent weeks on and off researching, reading, thinking, on how to pitch it, finding the right balance between depth and understandability.
How do the electrons jump across the region where there is zero probability of it being found? It's like jumping through a forbidden void where it cannot exit.
I am by no means an expert on this topic, but I think there's a difference between zero probability, and near zero probability. The electron is 'most likely' to be on one side or the other. That doesn't necessarily mean that the electron cannot temporarily enter the low probability area to switch sides. And if it does enter that area it is most likely just to cross over to the other side. In my mind I think of it in terms of 'being stable'. The electron is happy on one side, or happy on the other, but every now and then conditions are just right that it makes a very quick, and very low probability transition to the other side, where it likely becomes stable again. If the electron were hopping back and forth more regularly, there would be a higher probability in that dark region that separates the two sides, in which case there would be less 'stability' on one side vs the other.
Sir , the electron cloud which you showed of the electron's energy level , in that sir can you please specify the directions of the probability of electron in all the energy levels in all the 3 axis ?
Sir , I simply wanted to know the direction of all the orbitals , as you showed the direction in the p orbital when n = 2 ............. I think that you might have showed the direction of spin in that very orbital ?
@@divyanshugreninja6692 A good place to look is this video - Its part of the Mechanical Universe series - a little dated 1985 in fact - but excellent . Here is the whole video, but pay attention for 9:00 onwards - ua-cam.com/video/6IWhRffFRc8/v-deo.html
It’s actually part of calculus function. A derivative. The ‘d’ is shorthand for delta and means ‘change in’. Your question seems to suggest you don’t know calculus. Not needed for this video but a deeper understanding of Schrodinger equation will require calculus knowledge.
From what I know, photons do not have momentum. They are points and foundations of energy as in a matrix. They are not particles of speeding light. Unfortunately I am beginning to understand "intelligent energy" which science does not seem to consider.
Compton scattering is just an explanation to Thomson scattering using higher volts. They are theories that do work in our space-time, but create dirty technology that needs energy for propagation. Minkowski spacetime does not consider the real time of time-space. We are now in a new age of light and "intelligent energy". The theories of quantum mechanics were always difficult because of the lack of time-space , and intelligent energy that the atom operates with. These properties of the atom are now becoming important as AI develops and evolves into our experiences. It's hard for educated people because their realities are based on the past master's of science and mathematics.@@PhysicsHigh
You goal to teach physics to high school students is admirable but you have failed. You are only teaching to the elite advanced high school students. You present the ideas too quickly and speak to quickly. You need to "dumb it down" and slow down. Use more concrete examples using real world thoughts. All high school students need your expertise to understand physics , not just a select few.
I'd be happy if this equation was taught in my high school. Nice video, thanks! 😃
Thanks
Beautiful video! No one had explained the beauty of schrödinger's equation like that.
Great Explanation. 👍
Thanks.
Nice work! You kept it lively and did a rigorous job showing us how your chosen quantum system exists in its lowest allowed quantum state given its size, symetry and mass distribution. I am curious to know how two identical such systems would interact.
Well done! Love the simplicity
Thanks for the feedback.
Thank you for your video!
Really interesting and well explained.
I wish that I had access to your teaching when I was in uni studying this. I remember studying this in year 1 and 2 and thinking what the hell os going on! But your way is great. Thank you
Can we PLEASE get a video explaining the maths :))))))
I thought that would come. 🤓 How deep do you want to go? Derivation of time independent is fairly straight forward. To do one can be on my to do list but to be fair there are a few videos out there that do a great job already.
@@PhysicsHigh I for one would really much like to see somewhere decent explanation on how gamma radiation is released by electron going from higher energy state to lower energy state.
With accent on how negatively charged particle (electron) releases gamma radiation which does not have nor mass nor electric charge. Thank you
Great video sir. Excellent 🥳👌👌
Thanks
Does the wave functioon iss calculated in reference...considering electron as an standing wave
Can we say that orbitals are like standing oscillations of a sphere ?More technically, Can we extend 1D string analogy of standing waves to 3D ?
You can say that in a sense. The nature of standing waves is that they are in resonance and thus have discrete energy levels. That’s is true for orbitals. But their shape is a probability ‘map’ and not a physical reality.
Ah ha! now I get it...
...sorry Paul, I lied 🤷♂️
excellent video!
Thanks
We had learned a certain form of the Schrodingers Equation that included Partial Differentiation. Whats the difference between the one mentioned in the video and the one I had mentioned ?
theres no difference really unless you go into 3D problems, as you can see in this case the schrodinger's equation work with 1D problems only so partial and normal derivatives are the same
Honestly a great informative video. How long are videos this long usually in production?
Thanks. That depends on what aspect. The actual video and editing took maybe 4-5 hours in total. But in this one I spent weeks on and off researching, reading, thinking, on how to pitch it, finding the right balance between depth and understandability.
How do the electrons jump across the region where there is zero probability of it being found? It's like jumping through a forbidden void where it cannot exit.
I am by no means an expert on this topic, but I think there's a difference between zero probability, and near zero probability. The electron is 'most likely' to be on one side or the other. That doesn't necessarily mean that the electron cannot temporarily enter the low probability area to switch sides. And if it does enter that area it is most likely just to cross over to the other side. In my mind I think of it in terms of 'being stable'. The electron is happy on one side, or happy on the other, but every now and then conditions are just right that it makes a very quick, and very low probability transition to the other side, where it likely becomes stable again. If the electron were hopping back and forth more regularly, there would be a higher probability in that dark region that separates the two sides, in which case there would be less 'stability' on one side vs the other.
Sir , the electron cloud which you showed of the electron's energy level , in that sir can you please specify the directions of the probability of electron in all the energy levels in all the 3 axis ?
Not sure what you mean. There is no direction in the probability cloud.
Sir , I simply wanted to know the direction of all the orbitals , as you showed the direction in the p orbital when n = 2 ............. I think that you might have showed the direction of spin in that very orbital ?
@@divyanshugreninja6692 A good place to look is this video - Its part of the Mechanical Universe series - a little dated 1985 in fact - but excellent . Here is the whole video, but pay attention for 9:00 onwards - ua-cam.com/video/6IWhRffFRc8/v-deo.html
@@PhysicsHigh thanks sir
One question schro''dinger may double dots kyu hote hai plzzz reply 🙏🙏
??
Sir , what is the meaning of d which you place in the wave function equation after placing the value of wave function in the equation
It’s actually part of calculus function. A derivative. The ‘d’ is shorthand for delta and means ‘change in’. Your question seems to suggest you don’t know calculus. Not needed for this video but a deeper understanding of Schrodinger equation will require calculus knowledge.
@@PhysicsHigh yeah sir , I am currently in class 9 and I read it for enthusiasm
Awesome. Work hard. So hopefully my videos will be useful for a while 😉
@@PhysicsHigh yeah they are very useful for me , thank you and keep uploading such videos and can you please start a series about black hole ??
It’s on my to do list.
From what I know, photons do not have momentum. They are points and foundations of energy as in a matrix. They are not particles of speeding light. Unfortunately I am beginning to understand "intelligent energy" which science does not seem to consider.
They do have momentum, and the experiment by Compton verified this. Look up Compton effect. In fact I did a video on it
Compton scattering is just an explanation to Thomson scattering using higher volts. They are theories that do work in our space-time, but create dirty technology that needs energy for propagation.
Minkowski spacetime does not consider the real time of time-space.
We are now in a new age of light and "intelligent energy". The theories of quantum mechanics were always difficult because of the lack of time-space , and intelligent energy that the atom operates with. These properties of the atom are now becoming important as AI develops and evolves into our experiences.
It's hard for educated people because their realities are based on the past master's of science and mathematics.@@PhysicsHigh
👏👏👏👏
Thankyou.
reduced planck constant
Physics will be the death of me
You goal to teach physics to high school students is admirable but you have failed. You are only teaching to the elite advanced high school students.
You present the ideas too quickly and speak to quickly. You need to "dumb it down" and slow down. Use more concrete examples using real world thoughts.
All high school students need your expertise to understand physics , not just a select few.
Schroeders Rat
Haha!.. "Schrödinger's equation"...if electrons were waves then no atom would be stable
But if electrons were not waves you need to explain why they cause interference in diffraction
This is great.
How do you calculate the electron velocity of the wave function? Is it a constant or does it change with different energy levels?