The ONE RULE for LIFE - Immanuel Kant's Moral Philosophy - Mark Manson

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 бер 2024
  • The script for this animation was written and narrated by Mark Manson, an American self-help author and blogger. As of 2024, he has authored or co-authored four books, three of which, "The Subtle Art of Not Giving a F*ck", "Everything Is F*cked: A Book About Hope", and "Will", were New York Times bestsellers.
    In this video Mark Manson explores the moral philosophy of Immanuel Kant.
    Immanuel Kant (22 April 1724 - 12 February 1804) was a German philosopher and one of the central Enlightenment thinkers. Born in Königsberg, Kant's comprehensive and systematic works in epistemology, metaphysics, ethics, and aesthetics have made him one of the most influential and controversial figures in modern Western philosophy, being called the "father of modern ethics", "father of modern aesthetics" and, by bringing together rationalism and empiricism, the "father of modern philosophy".
    To learn more about these ideas, visit markmanson.net/ and please subscribe to Mark Manson's youtube channel / @iammarkmanson

КОМЕНТАРІ • 3,2 тис.

  • @EricCoplen
    @EricCoplen 2 місяці тому +4247

    "I would love to come out and party tonight guys, but I Kant" 😎

  • @ekurisona663
    @ekurisona663 2 місяці тому +1325

    evil begins when you start treating people like things instead of people

    • @OffGridInvestor
      @OffGridInvestor 2 місяці тому +56

      A bit like the average corporate stooge

    • @Rickety3263
      @Rickety3263 2 місяці тому +56

      Evil begins in the absence of God

    • @paulgoogol2652
      @paulgoogol2652 2 місяці тому +27

      as you can see how animals are treated.

    • @chucksolutions4579
      @chucksolutions4579 2 місяці тому +5

      Someone read Pterry?

    • @samvarcoe
      @samvarcoe 2 місяці тому +8

      Granny Weatherwax ❤

  • @Victor_Andrei
    @Victor_Andrei 29 днів тому +190

    "Treat humanity as ends and not means." Is precisely the kind of thing I'd try to get everyone else to believe.

    • @patrickfarley8036
      @patrickfarley8036 14 днів тому +5

      Sounds a lot like "Love thy neighbors as (you love) yourself." Jesus of Nazareth

    • @ajaxthegreat3515
      @ajaxthegreat3515 13 днів тому

      Indeed

    • @tonybrown7241
      @tonybrown7241 10 днів тому +2

      A fundamentalist principle of gynocrntric spiritualism is PREACHING Altruism without ever practicing it, for any reason other than making yourself look good.
      Sadly, this is the foundation of modern politics & religion.

    • @ajaxthegreat3515
      @ajaxthegreat3515 10 днів тому +6

      @@tonybrown7241 That is true, except for the part about it being gynocentric. If anything, it is more likely to be androcentric. But hypocrisy doesn't really have a gender.

    • @cloudy5867
      @cloudy5867 8 днів тому

      You are wrong about this. Look into utilitarianism. It's gonna fix your issue

  • @Cheyne4Chelsea
    @Cheyne4Chelsea Місяць тому +212

    Wow. You explained Kant's rule so simply a kindergartner could grasp it
    Well done. EXTREMELY well done

    • @notmelah
      @notmelah 22 дні тому +7

      Imma kindergardener and I confirm

    • @user-lj9we2rf1n
      @user-lj9we2rf1n 22 дні тому +5

      The fact I still understood very little then might not be good news for me

    • @-Robert
      @-Robert 15 днів тому +2

      @@user-lj9we2rf1n that's not true. You can watch the video multiple times or try writing out the script for yourself. The video has a very complex topic as basis and understanding the whole philosophy in one go is not easy if you're not already accustomed to the ideas surrounding it.
      The video is really well made. If any, I'd recommend you'd take notes for this or watch/listen to it multiple times, because realising that being moral means not wasting your potential is an important idea for people of all ages and times, and can improve anyones livfe manifold if they act upon it.
      You're not dumb, and telling yourself you are is immoral. Have a great day.

    • @dfazo1616
      @dfazo1616 13 днів тому

      @@-RobertW

    • @volodymyrdemydiuk8321
      @volodymyrdemydiuk8321 11 днів тому

      I believe it's not wrong to say author of this video got Kantscious

  • @jordancraig8911
    @jordancraig8911 2 місяці тому +915

    “Instead of grabbing his crotch , Kant made his argument with brutal rationality” 🤣 best line ever 😂

    • @Thalantanis
      @Thalantanis 2 місяці тому +13

      I couldn't stop laughing, best analogy ever!

    • @SuperKeithers
      @SuperKeithers 2 місяці тому +5

      lolol and i think ghandi said it in the other mandela universe ^^

    • @ashbrooks89
      @ashbrooks89 2 місяці тому +2

      I LOL’d on that one too!

    • @arachnidtea
      @arachnidtea Місяць тому +3

      16:10 for anyone wondering

    • @MonsieurMoustachio
      @MonsieurMoustachio Місяць тому

      where is the joke though? honest question.

  • @raycecil4643
    @raycecil4643 2 місяці тому +912

    I agree with Kant. Im turning 38 this year, and after living a life pretty much exactly mirroring Kant's up to now, I have actively decided to stop chasing the glamourous things, and start chasing the meaning behind my actions. Everything now must have a purpose, and a meaning.

    • @cheesball96
      @cheesball96 2 місяці тому +5

      Thanks for you comment. I always learn from comments like your.

    • @victorenock
      @victorenock 2 місяці тому +7

      Good luck

    • @PaulJackino
      @PaulJackino 2 місяці тому

      YES!

    • @geekahertz
      @geekahertz 2 місяці тому +1

      Can you give examples of what chasing the meaning behind your actions is?

    • @raycecil4643
      @raycecil4643 2 місяці тому +32

      @@geekahertz Sure! So, for example, I am a homesteader. Why? What is the meaning behind all the extra physical and mental work I have to do to live this lifestyle? Well, I have to first define homesteading as a Means, or the end. For me and my wife, its a means. We are doing this so that we become physically and mentally healthier, and raise our children in such a way as to teach them practical life skills that are not easily taught in a neighborhood, especiallyone with an HOA. The "end" here is to produce responsible young men, who will be productive not only for themselves, but to their family, community and friends. I homestead, but I also work as a mechanical engineer....engineering work is the means I use to afford the homesteading lifestyle. Its important I think, to make sure my "end" is serving of others. Once I maintain that servant mindset, I in turn get to enjoy my experience through life more, than if I was self-serving. So far, it has proven true, that serving others brings more satisfaction.

  • @joex222
    @joex222 Місяць тому +36

    I'm 43 and have been trying my best at self-improvement in the last 6 months. This video really makes me feel like I'm doing the right thing. I've also recently had a theory that everyone is just the same person inside a body with extremely different experiences. Treat people how you would want to be treated. I think the best thing you can do is help someone else self-improve by doing it yourself and showing everyone what is possible.

    • @shrunkensimon
      @shrunkensimon Місяць тому +2

      The golden rule. Love thy neighbour as yourself - "because he is yourself. Literally." Bill Hicks.
      "And I, if I be lifted up from the earth, will draw all men unto me.".

    • @happydogg312
      @happydogg312 28 днів тому

      "Everyone is just the same person inside a body with extremely different experiences."
      Thats a bunch of hogwash. This is the kind of hypothesis that rises from too much deep thinking and not enough living life.
      Some people are psychopaths, born that way. Some adjust to that and lead useful and productive lives while others become serial killers but they are both fundamentally different from the average person. They aren't psychopaths because they had different experiences.

    • @Path-of-Islam-
      @Path-of-Islam- 20 днів тому

      Sounds like The Egg Theory: ua-cam.com/video/h6fcK_fRYaI/v-deo.htmlsi=UwFrh9iVYAVUPVwi

    • @RPcropland
      @RPcropland 16 днів тому +3

      Yeah but not everyone wants to be treated the same as you. Work on understanding people instead. By assuming they are just like you, you are merely projecting yourself on them thereby robbing them of their autonomy and falling short of empathy. Like you said everyone has different experiences and that's what matters.

    • @DylanRay1234
      @DylanRay1234 10 годин тому

      @@RPcropland I don't believe the 'treat others...' rule means you treat them in the exact manner you prefer to be treated (with your own preferences and tastes) but rather that EVERYONE wants to be treated with respect. That's what it's talking about. If you treat yourself with respect and do the same with others, then you will naturally develop empathy and the ability to learn what it is they like and don't like.

  • @SomeYouTubeTraveler
    @SomeYouTubeTraveler Місяць тому +198

    "Do unto others as you would have them do to you" is the Golden Rule for a reason. Everyone is the Main Character in your story.

    • @agnesarellano6033
      @agnesarellano6033 Місяць тому +14

      this is not necessarily what he means, cause you could be treating yourself horribly and therefore unto others as well

    • @SomeYouTubeTraveler
      @SomeYouTubeTraveler Місяць тому +21

      @@agnesarellano6033 True. I think Jesus took the assumption that the listener was in a healthy mental state of self-worth. It's definitely an issue that projecting one's own self-loathing onto others leads to all sorts of horrific acts.

    • @CerealDust-nStuff
      @CerealDust-nStuff Місяць тому +7

      Do unto others as you would have them do to the person you love and respect the most.

    • @BlakedaBull
      @BlakedaBull Місяць тому +11

      But first love god with all your mind and heart .

    • @mRahman92
      @mRahman92 Місяць тому +10

      Everyone is the main character in _their_ story. You are still the main character in your story, but recognizing other people as people and not treating them like NPCs is supposed to be the goal here right?
      Although, there are some people who act like straight up wind-up dolls.

  • @AfterSkool
    @AfterSkool  2 місяці тому +703

    Each person must never be treated only as a means to some other end, but must also be treated as an end themselves. Don't allow yourself to be treated as a means. Do your best because anything less is to treat ourselves as a means rather than an end. Are you maximizing your potential? Or are you treating your mind and your attention as a mere pleasure receptacle?

    • @RemotelySkilled
      @RemotelySkilled 2 місяці тому +16

      Well done. Kant is difficult to be taken for granted, but you managed to deliver his ideas as axioms that need to be researched to be debatable. Astonishing outcome and my respect!

    • @sadgearmy4892
      @sadgearmy4892 2 місяці тому +15

      Yes I agree. When an 7' tall alpha bully at work gets angry and yells to coerce others into doing things his way then this is unethical and immoral because he is using others as a means to an end. Normally I just choose to not react out of stoicism and being a sigma, but he is getting out of hand. Because I have self respect, tonight I will tell this bully off. Thank you.

    • @scotchbarrel4429
      @scotchbarrel4429 2 місяці тому +4

      Interesting and timely perspective. I'm deciding whether to take a promotion earn more money and undoubtedly more stress and workload. The comfortable mindset is telling me to ignore it, ya dont need the stress, your job is great and it suits your lifestyle, but then the promotion and increased income is also a drawcard, and I'm stuck trying to weigh up what's more important - effing nightmare!
      Right, with that out of the way, lets see if this vid has any solutions.
      Edit: i agree with the progression from living life with the promiscuities of modern life, and maturing into middle age and reconciling all the things that have brought you to that point. Knowing thyself, probably the only takeaway i got from this vid, everything else is now common sense, at least to progressive societies.

    • @DavidLucas-zq8gb
      @DavidLucas-zq8gb 2 місяці тому +12

      Didn't Kant come up with the "universal principle" in which a behavior can only be deemed moral if everyone in society could engage in the same behavior without destroying its own ability to exist? For example, lying is immoral because if everybody were to engage in lying then communication would be destroyed thus making lying impossible because no one would bother to talk to each other. Stealing is immoral because if everyone were allowed to steal no one would own property thus making theft impossible.

    • @KingSnowyKerr
      @KingSnowyKerr 2 місяці тому +4

      ​@@sadgearmy4892let us know how it goes 😅

  • @etownshawn
    @etownshawn 2 місяці тому +280

    "Something to hope for" seems to be the only thing keeping me alive

    • @redlight3932
      @redlight3932 2 місяці тому +14

      Spend some time out of town it will change how you view the world

    • @vettie
      @vettie 2 місяці тому +4

      Just like me fr.

    • @WhiteWolfos
      @WhiteWolfos 2 місяці тому +4

      Then find something to do and find someone to love (even if that's under conjecture of some-things and ones to love like pets, hobbies, family, people, places, hanging out, routines etc). In a way, it circles around with something to do, but if you love those to-dos then your view gets that much brighter.

    • @TheMrEwe
      @TheMrEwe 2 місяці тому +12

      ​@@redlight3932 in theory that sounds great. I'm just getting by financially so I imagine spending some time out of town could involve running out of gas and foraging my way back to civilization, or just perish.

    • @RT-qd8yl
      @RT-qd8yl Місяць тому +6

      @@redlight3932 Yeah because everyone has disposable money to just call off work and f*** off to wherever

  • @CrazyTariber
    @CrazyTariber Місяць тому +19

    This is truly amazing. I have tried and searched for the last 10 years for a deeper understanding of life, at least for myself.
    I have never heard about Kant or at least I don't remember but I knew, from all the psychology videos I watched, I needed to work on myself first.
    All my hard work understanding myself and others, learning to communicate and being strong enough to open up, finally paying off.
    It is unbelievably hard to improve myself, and standing back up doesn't matter how often I thought "I keep trying, and it's changing nothing".
    It is not about doing everything perfect, but at least try your best.
    If I help others and give them the tools I learned, they will also make a positive change.
    Now I see the ripples from my positive feedback and being open, it's just the start.
    I never before felt so happy and proud.
    The internet is an incredible resource. I could write so much more.
    I never thought there would be a video that captured my belief system so well.
    The golden rule always comes back to my mind, and I think the Kant's one rule of life fits even better.
    Thank you for this video, I appreciate it a lot.

    • @joex222
      @joex222 Місяць тому +1

      Yes, this video hit me hard because im 40 and finally got some discipline and I am on a journey of self-imporvement. You become a beacon of hope for everyone in your life that sees the improvements you have made. Then you see others improving themselfs as well and the world around you becomes a better place.

  • @davida1606
    @davida1606 15 днів тому +3

    I grew up thinking something is wrong with my brain, but turns out I'm just a philosopher with an exuberance for understanding what is and what can be. So I have embraced my way of thinking. Immanuel and I would have been great friends.

  • @user-gf8hk3oc7t
    @user-gf8hk3oc7t Місяць тому +345

    Guys i feel so much relief when he said that no one would make a sustainable routine until the midle age, im 21 years old and im making pressure on myself to be thé best version that i Can be. Kant IS truely Amazing

    • @GeneralBaguvix
      @GeneralBaguvix Місяць тому +18

      Same here. I was so hard on myself when I was 19 that I'm not waking up at 5a.m. like Steve Jobs does, and I don't exercise 2 hours a day like that dude on UA-cam. I really feel you 😅

    • @Mawyman2316
      @Mawyman2316 Місяць тому +40

      @@GeneralBaguvix mimicking successful people will never lead to success, at least not on trivial matters like when you wake up. Forge your own path

    • @LibertyGoose
      @LibertyGoose Місяць тому +10

      This kind of thinking is RUINING our nation. Perpetual adolescence is NOT the answer. 18 is considered adulthood and people should act like adults at 18. Don’t excuse your own or others’ behavior because they aren’t old enough yet.
      Grow up dude. Get off your parent’s couch.

    • @LibertyGoose
      @LibertyGoose Місяць тому +1

      @@GeneralBaguvixextending your adolescence isn’t the answer either.
      Don’t you want to be like the loser Kant, wasting 12 years of your life and being meaningless??? Or don’t you want to change the world.?

    • @LibertyGoose
      @LibertyGoose Місяць тому +1

      @@Mawyman2316it absolutely will increase your chances at success.
      You don’t mimicking ppl, youre mimicking the behaviors that make ppl successful and in turn building self-discipline required to find and maintain your own potential

  • @djayjp
    @djayjp 2 місяці тому +119

    Kant also believed we had an absolute duty to always tell the truth under any and all circumstances, without exception.

    • @Sweethands4
      @Sweethands4 2 місяці тому +58

      That proposition is unbelievably naive, as was Kant's idealism.

    • @djayjp
      @djayjp 2 місяці тому +10

      @@Sweethands4 Agreed!

    • @canadiangemstones7636
      @canadiangemstones7636 2 місяці тому

      Autistic behaviour. Not possible for most humans.

    • @dixiedownunder1
      @dixiedownunder1 2 місяці тому +20

      Imagine how wonderful that would be if we lived in a world where everything and everyone was honest and transparent.

    • @djayjp
      @djayjp Місяць тому +8

      @@dixiedownunder1 It would be better, overall, for sure, if people state things that are objective, relevant, and not redundant (like telling someone fat that they're fat, unless the fat person doesn't believe that they're fat).

  • @user-vn2ii6mu9g
    @user-vn2ii6mu9g 12 днів тому +4

    The quandary that plagues man is the overwhelming desire to improve ones lot in life often requires canceling others quality of life.

  • @markhiebert4553
    @markhiebert4553 26 днів тому +6

    "Treat others as you would want to be treated, and don't make exceptions"

  • @ItsFundamental
    @ItsFundamental 2 місяці тому +177

    All seriousness please make more content on Philosophers, Ethics in school was never taught like this

    • @iunnox666
      @iunnox666 Місяць тому +6

      Yuri Bezmenov knows why.

    • @Slayer666th
      @Slayer666th Місяць тому

      Wasnt it for you?
      My philisophy class spent half a school year only on kant and in total 2 years just on ethics.

  • @Wafflethyme
    @Wafflethyme 2 місяці тому +61

    I tried to decipher the thumbnail for about 2 minutes before giving up and watching the video.

  • @yellstr
    @yellstr Місяць тому +5

    But then Nietzsche came along and said "You do you, but frankly… the universe does not give a single flying f@©k about you personally, or humanity as a whole. So you and your consciousness do not owe it anything. But, again, you do you."

  • @sarahalderman3126
    @sarahalderman3126 11 днів тому +4

    This is amazing. So much of this stuff I've struggled to understand/acknowledge on my own, likely due to the extensive SA I lived through until I was around 12. It really is about seeing our own value... which is exactly what childhood abuse destroys, our ability to see value in ourselves.❤

    • @mia1931
      @mia1931 9 днів тому +1

      i love your mindset and how you were able to aim for a positive outcome ❤️

  • @CloudWithoutASky
    @CloudWithoutASky 2 місяці тому +161

    The phrase that should be shaking the world right now is "self respect isn't about feeling good about yourself, it's about KNOWING YOUR WORTH."
    THIS is what the honest and dishonest sides of toxic positivity and self love culture fails to understand. You don't need to love yourself for any reason. You just need to respect yourself and know you are worth something. And that is enough.

    • @lightworker2956
      @lightworker2956 2 місяці тому +12

      I mean, that sounds good, but lots of especially young people don't feel that they have worth -- partly due to cultural messaging, partly because they're not contributing that much (they can't afford to have children) and partly because they're just another interchangeable person and the world wouldn't be different if they stopped existing.
      I'm not saying that people have no worth, I'm saying that people feel that they have no worth.

    • @CloudWithoutASky
      @CloudWithoutASky 2 місяці тому

      I would also argue they not only have worth, they also have the means to have children, many first world problems are entirely mental. if there is a will, there is always a way. its a universal truth in the human condition.
      Humans naturally have a self defense mechanism put into them biologically even, aside psychologically since birth.
      Humans naturally want to keep living, and when humans are fired at and put under direct attack. We defend ourselves.
      whether if its fight or flight situations, even reputations publically, or even when people are insulted on the internet or in person, are people prone to fight back and stick up for yourself?
      When you get bullied as a kid, you learn fast how to appreciate yourself the longer you survive, and know your worth, and to not let people get away from telling you different. People start sticking a finger in your face and telling you that you aren't any good.
      to "Afford" to have children is a cultural concept that is an arbitrary line drawn telling you that you can't survive with what you have, much less children. and it puts people in the spot where they self defeat themselves and even prevent pursuing from having kids.
      Fear is what controls the masses, and it controls people from living life and having kids. If a woman really really loves children and really wanted a future with kids, it isn't gonna stop her hearing what the world has to say over money.
      Money is only as powerful in your life as you let it be on your mind.
      what i was saying is that people need to stop FEELING so much when it comes to their worth as a human, and simply look at their actions of survival. most people, even depressed people still have their self defense mechanism implanted in their very bodies.
      the world doesn't matter so much as what you do in the world, and you do things not to change the world, but you do things for the sake of it.
      You don't become mother theresa or Einstein because you decided you wanted to put your mark on human history. They became who they are simply because they felt a mission to do specifically what they had done, they felt they had to do it. @@lightworker2956

    • @mogalixir
      @mogalixir 2 місяці тому

      Society, both men and women, teach young men they're worth nothing unless their deeds amount to something. The only thing, which came from the Men's Rights Movement initially, that Mr. Tate is right about. It's the ugly cloth that coats all socialization of boys growing up.

    • @iunnox666
      @iunnox666 Місяць тому +8

      @lightworker2956 That changes nothing other than difficulty of the task. Feeling good about yourself for something other than your worth is not going to help anyone.
      Celebrating obesity, for instance. It's completely unhealthy, trying to feel good about something you don't feel good about isn't a solution.

    • @X-SPONGED
      @X-SPONGED Місяць тому +8

      I've stuck with this particular quote a lot. I think it fits quite well in this context.
      "Pride is not the opposite of shame. It is the source of it. The true cure to shame is humility."
      Humility, not being an overconfident asshole but not downplaying your strengths because of your insecurities. A humble man will know when to step down from things he cannot do and to step up when he can. The ideal man, a true man.

  • @MrJeffrey938
    @MrJeffrey938 2 місяці тому +174

    So glad Kant seems to be becoming the next philosopher everyone's reviewing online; I was getting tired of Marcus Aurelius.

    • @sswan5271
      @sswan5271 2 місяці тому +30

      So was Marcus Aurelius

    • @enzocarranza
      @enzocarranza 2 місяці тому +2

      @@sswan5271what?

    • @jub7345
      @jub7345 2 місяці тому

      So was i ​@@sswan5271

    • @LEKSANDER01
      @LEKSANDER01 2 місяці тому

      He is stating that, Aurelius, if he saw how his works, life, and mostly all written things about him and what he believed were available for him to see, Aurelius would probably disapprove. @@enzocarranza

    • @hhjhj393
      @hhjhj393 2 місяці тому +8

      Ayn Rand is who I have been reading lately and she HATED Kant. My god her and her other objectivists hated him.

  • @MrMelonsz
    @MrMelonsz Місяць тому +5

    This is a really fine video. The illustrations are fantastic and the script writing is some of the best I’ve seen on UA-cam lol.
    Great job guys!

  • @joewoodhead2712
    @joewoodhead2712 15 днів тому +3

    This is one of the best videos I’ve ever seen.
    It’s great because it really enforces the issues we all know we should address, but don’t due to cyclical negative behaviours.
    It makes you concede to your own biases….
    And then gives you hope by saying that there is still time to change.

  • @jamessizemore7103
    @jamessizemore7103 2 місяці тому +91

    Holy shit this is literally "How to be a Good Person in Every Aspect of Life. In 20 Minutes or Less"

    • @thomasmaughan4798
      @thomasmaughan4798 27 днів тому

      I can do it in less than 20 minutes. What I do is good. What I do not is bad. Easy peasy.

    • @xcrazy98x51
      @xcrazy98x51 16 днів тому

      It also means, you have to go vegan :)

  • @David-he6uj
    @David-he6uj 2 місяці тому +113

    I've been reading the stoics for 5 years straight. Kant really sounds like an extension of stoicism. So, now I've got a whole lot more reading to do. 😅

    • @Rattus-Norvegicus
      @Rattus-Norvegicus 2 місяці тому +18

      I would suggest looking into Taoist philosophy. It combines stoic tenets with a more natural view of existence. Effectively it's stoicism without the self.

    • @dontlistentoanythingisay
      @dontlistentoanythingisay 2 місяці тому +7

      I’m starting to see men repurpose the idea of stoicism into an excuse for being generally rude and selfish. Nothing to do with your comment of stoicism other than the thought popped in my head.
      When I think of stoicism, I recall a magnet my mother gave me a long time ago. It showed a cowboy carrying a lamb with the caption “be strong in deed and gentle in manner”. It’s not about purely sucking it up and being a man, but knowing what a man should be first and his actions follow

    • @joesandbank3645
      @joesandbank3645 2 місяці тому +13

      I disagree. Kant had an extremist philosophy where things are black or white, right or wrong, with no room for nuance. I don’t think that’s the stoic message at all.

    • @ubitubee
      @ubitubee 2 місяці тому +3

      Afterwards try Nietzsche ;)

    • @drchill8837
      @drchill8837 Місяць тому +1

      @@joesandbank3645 exactly. How someone could think that Kant was in any way stoic is simply depressing. As is Immanuel Kant.

  • @TheRebelliousMeatPuppet
    @TheRebelliousMeatPuppet Місяць тому +67

    I have one rule that covers 'most' aspects of life "Create no harm, loss or damage for your fellow Man and if you do (accidents happen), make it right". Simple. Short. Comprehendable by all.

    • @DomFortress
      @DomFortress Місяць тому +1

      So when pain isn't harm, then how do we make right to the generational harms we inflicted on the minds of younger generations, now that we coddled them from most emotional discomfort through hedonistic overindulgence?

    • @TheRebelliousMeatPuppet
      @TheRebelliousMeatPuppet Місяць тому

      @@DomFortress To be brutally honest with you, if you need to be told the answer that question, I don't think you're ready to know. Not to mention it's a far deeper subject matter than could be properly addressed in a youtube comments section.

    • @DomFortress
      @DomFortress Місяць тому

      @@TheRebelliousMeatPuppet "brutally honest"? Or merely pretentious postering due to reasons other than comfort and convenience? Why don't you surprise me by yourself ignoring the fact that for the past decade, I've been developing myself away from my behaviors addictions and chronic depression? How is it possible to experience post traumatic growth within the contexts of immunometabolism, metabolic psychiatry, psychonuroendocrinology, and muscle centric functional medicines, by myself consistently practice Valsalva maneuver during powerlifting and kickboxing, Wim Hof method for none shivering thermoregulation during cold plunges, time restricted intermittent fasting protocols, elimination diet of all ultra processed food products, and optimizing my gut microbiome diversity using single ingredient whole foods as natural probiotics, prebiotics, and postbiotics, just to name a few?
      "All your excuses are lies"
      - Jocko Wilkins

    • @TheRebelliousMeatPuppet
      @TheRebelliousMeatPuppet Місяць тому

      @@DomFortress Brutally honest...you're just too young, inexperienced, unlearned and unbegun to be able to pick up on these things. Sorry for you. You're clearly a keyboard commando. Life isn't lived or explained in a comments section there genius. Grow up gamer boi.

    • @krausewitz6786
      @krausewitz6786 Місяць тому

      How does this cover consumption? (It doesn't)

  • @GabrielLopez-we6yn
    @GabrielLopez-we6yn Місяць тому +2

    Best channel nowadays in UA-cam. Thank you for your strong messages

  • @Cree_84
    @Cree_84 2 місяці тому +265

    I'm grateful for After Skool. The weaving of uniquely beautiful art with thought provoking wisdom is executed masterfully. I purchased both of Mark's books and the accompanying journal a moment ago. Can't wait to dive in!
    Thank you for everything you create and provide to the world 🙏

    • @AfterSkool
      @AfterSkool  2 місяці тому +31

      Aww I really appreciate that. Your encouragement goes a long way. God bless.

    • @turtletom8383
      @turtletom8383 2 місяці тому +1

      Interesting I usually really like after schools and I didn't hate the message it was more the way it was presented the guy goes on about kant in the first 2 minutes with a bit to much hyperbole making some really glorified statements. Im used to afterskoolz being a bit more reasonable

    • @HeLpLOstGOdAny1
      @HeLpLOstGOdAny1 2 місяці тому +2

      @@AfterSkool So how would you attempt to convince people of a particular cult that forcing children in to marriage is breaking that one rule, when their agenda says otherwise?

    • @turtletom8383
      @turtletom8383 2 місяці тому

      @@HeLpLOstGOdAny1 kants work at best is unfinished some say their are no true ends only means

    • @AnAntidisestablishmentarianist
      @AnAntidisestablishmentarianist 2 місяці тому +3

      Mark's end here was getting people to buy his book to enrich himself. I read part of the Subtle Art and gave up half way through because there is nothing there of any substance. It's 100% marketing - he's the edgy self help guru who swears a lot and gives useless counter-intuitive advice and his audience is rebellious people who want justification for not trying.

  • @sirreginalddukeofchutney234
    @sirreginalddukeofchutney234 2 місяці тому +25

    I’ve been following for a few years. The art is always so impressive and beautiful.
    This was a wonderful episode.
    Thank you!!!

  • @Yaruandromedano1111
    @Yaruandromedano1111 16 днів тому +2

    This is my first time learning about Kant and I’ll say that he was WAY ahead of his time.

  • @dtthebarber8695
    @dtthebarber8695 24 дні тому +1

    The philosophy is spot on. These are the words for the thoughts that I’ve been trying to properly structure.

  • @Ex_877
    @Ex_877 2 місяці тому +54

    "A global governing body that would guarantee peace across most of the world."
    You might want to reconsider that line.

    • @adavies3
      @adavies3 2 місяці тому +15

      😂 I was thinking the same thing, I just scrolled through the comments section and you are the only person that pointed this out!
      All the best 👍🏼

    • @LoveratLoves
      @LoveratLoves Місяць тому

      @@adavies3 I just came to the comments to spit on the idea of One World Governments and their insistence we will own nothing and be happy, we will eat ze bugs and live in the pod.

    • @triforcelink
      @triforcelink Місяць тому +2

      As bad as the news makes it sound, I don’t think we’re doing too bad.

    • @lexluong8155
      @lexluong8155 Місяць тому

      Already exists called America lead hemegony.

    • @funnymcfunfuns1455
      @funnymcfunfuns1455 Місяць тому +9

      First thing I heard that made me realize this guy was full of crap

  • @user-qb9gb2yg4i
    @user-qb9gb2yg4i 2 місяці тому +10

    This is a vid you have to watch multiple times because you'll come across something so thought provoking each time. thanks

  • @earlschandelmeier751
    @earlschandelmeier751 Місяць тому +2

    This is one of the best videos I have listened to in a very very long time! What a perfectly succinct and modern way to deliver Kant's message! A few f-bombs, a little irreverence. A few cultural references... Just completely perfectly well done!

  • @MitchtopiaTechnologies
    @MitchtopiaTechnologies 5 днів тому +1

    4:20 can i just say, that visual is absolutely beautiful, i can't really describe it and i'm not gonna try, but
    wwoww

  • @longhairdontcare122
    @longhairdontcare122 2 місяці тому +36

    Fair point about not fully using one's ability at any given time being immoral I have much to rethink.

  • @ser6Ijvolk
    @ser6Ijvolk 2 місяці тому +47

    "Starting with yourself" is often either misinterpreted or even used maliciously to mean "mind your own business" or "do it yourself, if you don't like it". When, in fact, it doesn't mean that you shouldn't complain or should personally fix the problem, it means, among other things, that you should do what you can to change the world for the better, and depending on the circumstances, that can also mean complaining and raising awareness of other people doing a bad job.

    • @rentenfuchs3025
      @rentenfuchs3025 Місяць тому +5

      "Starting with yourself" is not very popular among those people who want to save the climate, the Global South, the proletariat, or whatever is the thing du jour. More often than not these are the very same people who cannot be bothered to keep their room tidy or at least in a decent condition.

    • @jonathanisernhagen6515
      @jonathanisernhagen6515 Місяць тому

      Complaining is lazy and usually cowardly.

    • @fmlAllthetime
      @fmlAllthetime Місяць тому

      Kant seemed bothered to me. What's all the fight for?

    • @jpm199
      @jpm199 Місяць тому

      ​​@@rentenfuchs3025 yeah ok buddy go ask a palestinian to keep their room tidy before they start demanding better conditions,

    • @wstavis3135
      @wstavis3135 Місяць тому +1

      How did you rationalize that? Starting with yourself means fix or improve the only thing you can actually control. There is nothing new about the philosophy. It shows up in Chinese wisdom, for example. "If you want to change your country, change your state. If you want to change your state, change your city. If you want to change your city, change your community. If you want to change your community, change your house (family). If you want to change your house (family), change yourself."
      Both the Chinese proverb and Kant imply a radiating effect outward. This is because it proceeds from "truth" or visual principal.
      The reason most people who "want to change the world" are looked at as immature and ignorant is because their desire comes from a desire to force others to acceed to their desires while exempting themselves from the same.
      So, no, that is not what Kant means at all. In fact, he rather explicitly says so as well.

  • @dothacker333
    @dothacker333 Місяць тому +1

    Wooahh, when you held up your book I recognized the font and title real quickly. Turned around to my book shelf and sure enough I see your other book about the subtle art of not giving an F. That is so cool.
    Good video and I enjoyed the journey!

  • @josefn.8297
    @josefn.8297 12 днів тому +1

    I knew that Kant is still very relevant for our modern lives, but not, that he is to that extent.
    Many thanks for these great insights.

  • @paulluberg2503
    @paulluberg2503 2 місяці тому +107

    Your videos tear down the veil of the dysfunctional reality I was stuck in for so long - thank you from the bottom of my heart!

    • @AfterSkool
      @AfterSkool  2 місяці тому +6

      Thank you!

    • @citycrusher9308
      @citycrusher9308 2 місяці тому

      @@AfterSkool 7:20 - hey, thanks for admitting your w ife doesn't love you. And that intimacy with her is something you, yourself, see as bad. (self loathing - you gotta love it)

    • @kyo_.
      @kyo_. Місяць тому

      ​@citycrusher9308 I'm not quite sure what ur trying to say, do u think doing something for someone just to sleep with them is a good thing?

    • @citycrusher9308
      @citycrusher9308 Місяць тому

      @@kyo_. yes. There is nothing is wrong with men wanting intimacy. That is what sx is to men.
      It's like saying - ''its a bad thing for men to look after themselves or consider their wants and needs''

    • @kyo_.
      @kyo_. Місяць тому +2

      @citycrusher9308 It's good when sex is the means for both your happiness and hers. It's bad when sex is the end. The difference is whether or not ur willing to use her as a means to get laid
      the difference is that doing it ONLY for yourself regardless of what she wants vs doing it for both of you, and as kant said its hard to tell which one is it for other ppl but its often shown that ppl are willing to resort to things like cheating, manipulative tactics like silent treatment etc to get sex, disregarding the happiness of the other (this applies to both parties of the relationship) so sex being the end goal also means that the means maaaay include other selfish things, bcuz after all your end would not be including your wife's happiness in this case otherwise she would be included in it, and not just "sex".

  • @joshuasantomauro2283
    @joshuasantomauro2283 2 місяці тому +5

    Thank you, this has given me a broader outlook on life, and changed my perspective on what we do. I will always do my best to ask myself what is my means to an end according to any actions I take.

  • @melodyofloveinblood
    @melodyofloveinblood Місяць тому

    I wish someone like this every six months so that I can come back to it and watch it again

  • @zin6730
    @zin6730 Місяць тому

    This has been the most interesting video I have watched in a very very very long time! We need more like these and hopefully it touches more people to bring at least a change in one person!

  • @aditya.sood077
    @aditya.sood077 2 місяці тому +20

    I was browsing Twitter and realised that I'm not doing the best I can. So I came here to watch this video. This surely is way less addicting than Twitter 😁

    • @Kingdeathtrooper
      @Kingdeathtrooper Місяць тому

      And that's proof of something Kant got wrong. Wasting time led you here, to a better outcome. He doesn't account for random chance.

  • @thecomprehensionhub4612
    @thecomprehensionhub4612 2 місяці тому +25

    We're making it out of the darkness with this video! Bringing humanity up ⏫

  • @WinkLinkletter
    @WinkLinkletter 27 днів тому +2

    The 'Free Candy' example drawing is a dark af but accurate depiction of this deception's extreme.

  • @AlexanderFWinter
    @AlexanderFWinter 21 день тому +1

    Bro you explained this 10 x better than my philosophy prof

  • @karuchiu
    @karuchiu 2 місяці тому +6

    Mark Manson is my best author. I love his humor.🔥

  • @djsaintmichael
    @djsaintmichael 2 місяці тому +6

    I was just thinking today when I woke up, there isn’t a video on Jordan Petersons mention on Efficiency. Talk about getting my wish…and you swore so much too. Very Kant of you.

  • @dudeman4071
    @dudeman4071 Місяць тому

    This was actually some beautiful philosophy. Something I want to integrate in my life. Thanks for making this video.

  • @lbrowning2543
    @lbrowning2543 Місяць тому +7

    He made a mistake not going to the beach.

  • @ReynaSingh
    @ReynaSingh 2 місяці тому +83

    Kant upheld reason as the source of our knowledge, which is understandable considering the historical context behind his ideas. but not all things that we know to be true can be rationalized, and that’s the problem we try to ignore today

    • @RadioStationEXP
      @RadioStationEXP 2 місяці тому +11

      Can you give an example of something that we know to be true that can't be "rationalized"?

    • @RemotelySkilled
      @RemotelySkilled 2 місяці тому +14

      Sorry, but that is an oversimplification. There are nature and nurture in humans.
      Nature displays e.g. in the social drive (herd mammals, 300.000 year old drive) or fight, flight and freeze (the limbic system we share with many species) in psychology also debated and referred to as the four Fs: Fight, Flight, Feed and sexual endeavours...
      Nurture is what you learn (with your neocortex) when experiencing the world from a 1st person perspective. Feeding spots, danger, procreation opportunities etc. and foremost and most important to me: Music systems such as twelve-tone or Raga.
      Kant did not distinguish really about the causes, but just abstracted the effects (what it should be like to be human). Therefore it is impeccable in that context, but it doesn't link need and means at all. E.g. who wouldn't lie when in lethal danger to circumvent it? It is a luxury that many many humans living today do not have. But it is absolutely prime and valid to strife for!

    • @donniebgood1486
      @donniebgood1486 2 місяці тому +4

      I Kant understand what yall are talking about

    • @ak-zxr0358
      @ak-zxr0358 2 місяці тому +5

      Exactly, its not wrong… just idealistic

    • @millanferende6723
      @millanferende6723 2 місяці тому +3

      ​@@ak-zxr0358It's only idealistic because this is not something we are being taught in schools. Our philosophy and self knowledge only scratches the surface in schools. But it is not something that we cannot change.

  • @Sunny-gj6mh
    @Sunny-gj6mh 2 місяці тому +30

    I felt like clicking Mark Manson's links was the "end" here and the video was the "means". It goes deeper first, then comes to a full circle. UA-cam is the "means", making our eyes mostly see stuff they want is the "end". Under the circumstances, Afterskool's desire to show me these is the "end" and Mark Manson is now the "means". I love these videos, AfterSkool. I hope you keep doing 'em and use whatever "means" to do so!

    • @rumpeldumpel675
      @rumpeldumpel675 2 місяці тому +3

      Man I'm not gonna lie you kinda just blew my mind

    • @paulgoogol2652
      @paulgoogol2652 2 місяці тому +1

      this text sure is the means to end the functionality of my brain.

    • @whataboutthis10
      @whataboutthis10 Місяць тому

      "whatever means to do so" did you not just watch a video explaining how some like consciousness is off limits for 'means'..

  • @williamwilliams7706
    @williamwilliams7706 Місяць тому +5

    I've been on and off reading 'Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance' and this video explains the ethics of Kant in a much simpler way than the author did.

    • @Cbr_auh
      @Cbr_auh Місяць тому

      5:33 is very much in line with what Pirsig writes on value. Something like: 'Facts do not exist until we assign value to them'.

  • @MrAuswest
    @MrAuswest 6 днів тому

    Saved this vid to favourites. May need to watch same time every week.
    I will no longer allow myself to waste the precious time or energy my consciousness has left!

  • @itwasmewasntit2448
    @itwasmewasntit2448 Місяць тому +3

    This is super cool,the drawings are really good complements of the topics. (Also,those drawings are ART,damn) Thanks for making this!

  • @MrLuigiFercotti
    @MrLuigiFercotti 2 місяці тому +17

    The would is full of users, who see people as means to an end. Everyone has done it at some point, but for some it’s a way of life. The great irony is how they often see themselves as moral people.

    • @dixiedownunder1
      @dixiedownunder1 2 місяці тому +1

      They're the worst kind of people. Evil people who truly believe they are good.

  • @Francois.E
    @Francois.E 8 днів тому

    I am totaly in this way to think and act, without a previous knowledge of Kant's philosophy, amazing !

  • @geoben9801
    @geoben9801 8 днів тому

    "Do unto others as you would have others do unto you."
    ✨The Golden Rule ✨

    • @Oktokolo
      @Oktokolo 5 днів тому

      Personal taste and preferences exist. Ones good may be the others bad.

  • @kendradorman6014
    @kendradorman6014 2 місяці тому +3

    Okay… I haven’t actually laughed out loud so much in a long while. THANK YOU! I don’t know who wrote this but love how you keep it real.

  • @larryappelbaum2245
    @larryappelbaum2245 Місяць тому +37

    Simplified:
    You get to do whatever the heck you want, I get to do whatever the heck I want.
    Only one rule applies; neither of us gets to violate the rights of the other.

    • @VultureXV
      @VultureXV Місяць тому +10

      Not the best simplification without a definition of what "rights" are though. "Rights" are not a universal civil consensus and are subject to culture and history.
      Kant's description, at least, is clear-cut enough (with the ends/means wording) to give a better definition as to what could be proper boundaries. Without it, one can simply say something like, "right to self defense is not a right to my culture" or "right of sexual liberty is not a right to my religion." Etc etc.
      Hopefully I'm not overanalyzing again.

    • @sebbkovic4224
      @sebbkovic4224 Місяць тому

      What you describe sounds like PARADISE to, where I'm from, 😢.

    • @h20deliriousfan82
      @h20deliriousfan82 Місяць тому +1

      This omits the protection of one's self. Which is to say, it is immoral to do whatever one wants if it effects anyone negatively.

    • @ColburnClark
      @ColburnClark Місяць тому +1

      That's a good reason to be vegan

    • @OGTK00
      @OGTK00 Місяць тому +2

      Except it doesn't exactly work that way because we live in a society where stuff what one does utlimately ends up impacting someone else (even if not at the moment).

  • @androgynouslibra7607
    @androgynouslibra7607 Місяць тому +13

    I studied Kant in Ethics class, and his ethics really made me think deeper about how I look at treating other people

  • @Patrick-xc4ul
    @Patrick-xc4ul 12 днів тому +1

    This narrator/writer is the Life of the party I have been looking to find, for- (it seems like forever!) Thanks for your effort 😂 tremendous.

  • @graydogger5711
    @graydogger5711 2 місяці тому +20

    I know nothing about Kant but the lying statement stood out to me. Suppose Person-A lied to Person-B so that Person-B would not be exposed to some sort of distreasing information at the time. So that at a later time, Person-A may then reveal the truth when Person-B is better able to handle it. Is not Person-B still the end in this case and lying would be justifiable?

    • @matthewagooden
      @matthewagooden 2 місяці тому +12

      I think that’s why the creator of the video said Kant is still hotly disputed to this day. There is a lot of gray area in how humans interact with each other, and how that correlates with outcomes and consequences. I agree with Kants points in principle but nuance must be applied to situations. Especially in a world as complex as the 21st century

    • @Gbhmagic
      @Gbhmagic 2 місяці тому

      a simpler was of stating it is. You are in Poland(my country) You shielding Jews... Nazis ask "do you know where the Jews are"?

    • @dixiedownunder1
      @dixiedownunder1 2 місяці тому +2

      I think you can avoid or delay unpleasant interactions, but you cannot lie.

    • @WinkLinkletter
      @WinkLinkletter 27 днів тому +2

      My ex-girlfriend, when she was a little girl, dropped the Thanksgiving turkey on the kitchen floor when her grandmother let her take it in to the dining room her first time. Distraught in tears, my ex was told by her grandma "Don't worry about it, sweetheart, go tell the guests it will be a couple more minutes and grandma will get the spare turkey out of the oven...our secret.". She then, of course, proceeded to wash off the turkey and bring it out as the 'spare' turkey, never letting on the truth. It took my ex growing up to realise what really had to have happened that afternoon, and how kind and sweet her granny had been.
      I am a big fan of the mercifully and judiciously applied white lie.

    • @thomashiggins9320
      @thomashiggins9320 19 днів тому

      @@WinkLinkletter Children are not really fully functional and capable moral actors.
      The primary responsibility of a parent is to protect kids as much as needed *while at the same time* educating them to eventually become morally responsible, intellectually and emotionally capable adults accountable for their decisions and their actions.

  • @hadessss9723
    @hadessss9723 2 місяці тому +102

    There was this quote, I can't remember it word for word, and I know I'm going to butcher it, but it went something like:
    I wanted to fix the world, but when I realized it was unrealistic, I thought perhaps I can become president. When I realized that I couldn't do that either, then I figured, I could at least become the mayor. Eventually I thought well maybe, I could just try to fix my family and friends. I learned that I could not change anyone but myself. But If I fix myself for the better, perhaps it could change my friends and family, who could then change a city, and a city to a nation. A nation to a world, and indeed I could change the world.

    • @whataboutthis10
      @whataboutthis10 Місяць тому +5

      ..then I grew out of my twenties and realised how such thinking was childish

    • @lancecereal3673
      @lancecereal3673 Місяць тому +7

      @@whataboutthis10 and it may be childish, yet it is that childish hopefulness that keeps us from abandoning the world to nihilism. For, if we were to accept the unrelenting cruelty of the world, we must also accept that the world is full of kindness and compassion born from that childish nature.

    • @peterpan4038
      @peterpan4038 Місяць тому +4

      @@whataboutthis10 Indeed it's highly unlikely, hence borderline childish.
      But it's not impossible, the odds are just horribly stacked against us.
      And what do you do if the odds suck, but the "price" is to good to ignore? You try again and again and again, or even better: motivate more people to join in. If enough people work on themselves with the goal of becoming a better influence on their community, and the world at large => then the odds of actually changing the world for the better get much better.

    • @FalcoStarlight
      @FalcoStarlight Місяць тому +3

      You are the world... ❤

  • @wzll7786
    @wzll7786 5 днів тому

    I like how the quote at the end had nothing to do with the values and logics discussed in the video earlier yet made the most sense

  • @StefAdr
    @StefAdr Місяць тому

    Thank you for this video! It seems that my morals align 100% with what you show, so I'm not alone in the world!

  • @fishtacos007
    @fishtacos007 2 місяці тому +8

    I wish this video was available last semester when I was taking business ethics. We discussed Kant throughout the entire course

    • @harrisc8101
      @harrisc8101 2 місяці тому +3

      It is a wonder why there is any study of business ethics. Businesses start small and have morals, typically. Then they grow large and just become monsters. Profit takes precedence over all other concerns especially ethics. So I is not wonder what makes that happen and whether or not business ethics is even viable.

    • @AQBPlays
      @AQBPlays 2 місяці тому +1

      Ofc it is viable. Run even a tiny SME when other peoples lives depend on the success of your business. You’ll soon change your mind.

    • @josef2012
      @josef2012 2 місяці тому

      I assume on the final there was "Of course,all these ethics will seem quaint once you enter the real world of Market Capitalism. Enjoy!"

  • @09Dragonite
    @09Dragonite 2 місяці тому +7

    So I generally don't have much care for the philosophies of Kant, however, a professor of mine once quoted Kant's "treat everyone as an ends, not as a means to an end" with that slight twist of wording.
    That's when I realized that our entire species and everyone with power, wealth, or an opinion to post on the internet was entirely full of shit. Like, it was a wake-up call to just get off of social media and *live* my life with the people who make life *worth* living to begin with.
    The world is a big place. It's much too big to let yourself be treated and used like an object. And honestly, that sounds a little victim-blamey, but *SO* many people *literally* allow it to happen. Like, there is an enormous difference between being brutally forced into being an object or a tool and just actually letting yourself be seen or used as one.
    BUT even MORE IMPORTANTLY, don't use people. That was the takeaway that I got. Too many people with too much "power" just use people, and WE LET THEM. Not necessarily ourselves (although social media uses us 100% of the time thanks to selling our personal information) but we, as human beings, literally *allow* for people in power to socially "justify" the horrible ways that they treat other people for money, and that fucking pisses me off beyond reason.

  • @programmers_sanctuary
    @programmers_sanctuary 18 днів тому

    Not only are you great at sketching and color schemes, but you're great at explaining a philosophy!

  • @boydwyatt
    @boydwyatt Місяць тому

    All that time and effort and he just re-engineered the GOLDEN RULE and defined it in greater detail. Do unto others as you would have done unto yourself.

  • @user-dg7df3sv7r
    @user-dg7df3sv7r 2 місяці тому +28

    I took a college Philosophy course when I was just a Junior in High School. *AMAZING* Professor. A lot of it was over my hormone-riddled head, but Kant resonated so deeply with me, I almost feel like he has been a constant friend throughout this lifetime 🥰

    • @Alastair_Adana
      @Alastair_Adana 2 місяці тому

      If you had a bad professor, how would that change your experience? You have no choice over which professor was chosen. Would you have the will to continue the study despite the professor? Where did this will originate from? If your parents taught you the strength of will, then did you really make the choice to study the subject or was it made beyond your control long ago and your whole life has been leading to that moment? Thanks.

  • @swedebug2889
    @swedebug2889 2 місяці тому +8

    An excellent episode.
    I needed to hear this today. ❤

  • @watermenplumbingfiltration144
    @watermenplumbingfiltration144 Місяць тому

    I believe there is a way to know how to precisely make someone happy. At the very least, in the short term. Whether one “should” is a different discussion. (which I would love to have btw)
    Thanks for this .

  • @JR-bj3uf
    @JR-bj3uf Місяць тому +2

    My Great Grandfather was a creature of habit like Kant. The family had the same meal plan every week (roast in Sunday, hash from the leftover roast on Monday). My dad said that he had taken his little wagon with Grandpappa to the store. All the employees knew him and they had his order waiting on him. He got the same things every week. He worked for Railway Express as a manager. After the trucks left he would sweep the shop and the employee's said that when Pappa laid his broom on the central pillar and rolled down his sleeves it was straight up noon. He walked to a bar called the Blazing Stump once a week for a shot of whisky. He was hit by a car and knocked down. He was in his late 70s at the time. The police came, an ambulance was called and he was taken home. My grandmother made a fuss over him but turned her back and he vanished. He hadn't had his drink and he had set off once more.

  • @christaylor8337
    @christaylor8337 2 місяці тому +36

    I Kant say enough about this one.

  • @SupercarEnjoyer
    @SupercarEnjoyer 2 місяці тому +8

    What a phenomenal video. Thanks.

  • @Cerviel
    @Cerviel Місяць тому +5

    The part about self-actualization is soo true. I achieved so many goals and hit a lot of marks in life in order to be “successful” but honestly, the thing that makes me happiest about my success is what it allows me to do with/for my wife and dogs. They are what makes me truly happy, and their happiness flows back to me.

  • @phillipotey9736
    @phillipotey9736 День тому

    Everyone should learn this in elementary school and again in highschool. Kent's rule is not universal to creating peace and happiness, (can't handle self sacrifice) But does give an amazing foundation in ethical morality. Absolutely love kant.

  • @ciaranlaurings9326
    @ciaranlaurings9326 2 місяці тому +9

    Mark Manson garners more respect from me as the years roll on, now i find that he also likes Kant, who is my favourite philosopher and my pick for the smartest human being ever to live, in terms of pure intellect. Stunning presentation of some fundamentally imperative ideals

  • @Tletna
    @Tletna Місяць тому +3

    I never had interest in reading Kant until now. Thanks for the video. I don't know if I consider what was laid out in this video to be a true moral guide but it definitely serves as an ethical guide.

  • @thatjeff7550
    @thatjeff7550 Місяць тому +1

    Another way to state Kant's "people aren't a means to an end" is Pratchett's "The only sin is treating people as things. The rest are merely reiterations of the only sin."

  • @zachhoy
    @zachhoy Місяць тому

    I like that the higher self is always teal in this art style. Also nice summary of Kant, a great refresher or first lesson for many I bet.

  • @shyamnair555
    @shyamnair555 2 місяці тому +12

    Never treating someone as a means but an as end themselves is probably a good version of humanity and respect put as a rule.

    • @helinn6140
      @helinn6140 2 місяці тому

      so having doctors is a means to stopping people dying?

  • @AtTheDoor
    @AtTheDoor 2 місяці тому +4

    You always manage to make magic with your art, combining this timeless wisdom that I haven’t dived in yet with the incredibly deep symbolism of your art to help us absorb the wisdom. I had to pause every now and then to let the words and art sink in. A truly marvel, thanks bro!

  • @Lifes4fn
    @Lifes4fn Місяць тому

    Thanks, not only for the correct content, but also for the fine way of illustrating.

  • @user-pt2gf2ou5d
    @user-pt2gf2ou5d Місяць тому +2

    I believe every one just does things to help themselves either emotional or physically

    • @joex222
      @joex222 Місяць тому

      Well they try.. Most people do things that fail to help.

  • @SvetlanaTulasi
    @SvetlanaTulasi 2 місяці тому +7

    This is so great, the speaker is an absolute GOAT

  • @ATRTAP
    @ATRTAP 2 місяці тому +6

    Humanity has to be continually saved from itself, ethics could often get it the way- dangerously.

  • @Boi33-mc4hs
    @Boi33-mc4hs 14 днів тому +1

    Kant needed such a simple, structured life to be able to devote his mind to developing his deep complex philosophies, imo.

  • @lake5044
    @lake5044 Місяць тому +10

    This is the issue with how philosophy is taught and studied: you build a theory on top of an assumption but you never stop to question that assumption.
    The whole way Kant is defining what it means to be an end is non-sensical. You don't eat a burrito because it's an end. You eat it because you predict that it will minimize your emotional suffering and maximize your emotional happiness. The brain is literally unable to control what it wants. The consequences it predicts for a thing determine how it will feel about it. You can't love or hate a person or a thing without having a prediction that they will make your life less miserable and happier or more miserable and less happy. Even when you do something that will hurt you in the long run, you do it because the present suffering exceeds the uncertain prediction of suffering in the future.
    Morality can exist; when the rules of the game make it the best strategy. But in objective terms, if something will benefit you, in all direct and indirect ways (such as others adopting the same behavior), then it cannot objectively be labelled "immoral". The only issue is that accounting for all the consequences of an action is hard. Feeling something is "good" or "evil" often just means we disagree on what the consequences of something will be.
    Also, play this ncase.me/trust/ it explains nicely what I mean by "morality exists when the game rules allow for it".

    • @TheMessage25
      @TheMessage25 Місяць тому +2

      Didn't read all of it right now but I will come back too this

    • @asdfasdfasdf1218
      @asdfasdfasdf1218 Місяць тому

      It's a hypothesis, at least from this video alone. Does it match previous knowns, if it does, then maybe it has predictive power to unknowns i. e. moral situations you're not familiar with.

    • @fmlAllthetime
      @fmlAllthetime Місяць тому +1

      Kant seemed bothered by life. Imagine that... constantly being bothered and striving. Towards what exactly?

    • @eonbeats
      @eonbeats Місяць тому +3

      The brain can certainly control what it wants. That's what makes us human. The burrito analogy was weak, but it was just to spark a beginning understanding of the philosophy. At a deeper level, Kant is asking us to define what ends we are aiming to achieve, and to be honest as to the means towards those ends. I don't think he expects us to never eat burritos for our own pleasure or enjoyment, but the framework he is providing is an excellent place to start to reflect on what intentions you are using behind your actions.
      Eating the burrito is a means to some end; what end are we aiming towards when we eat it? Can we be honest with ourselves on whether the end is the satisfaction of our moment to moment desires, or on whether we are doing it towards the end of bettering the human species by nourishing ourselves in the healthiest manner possible? Kant is not expecting us to be perfectly moral, but instead, to begin to question what our ends are and what means we are using towards those. Everything you said seems to me an attempt to discount a very valuable framework by being particular about the usage of the certain word 'immoral'.

    • @fmlAllthetime
      @fmlAllthetime Місяць тому +1

      @@eonbeats Being particular is the realm of philosophy is it not?
      Just confused what exactly your objection is in regards to OP. It would seem you're arguing semantics doesn't play any role here, but given Kant's cultural and religious upbringing, his use of immoral definitely has layers to it, would it not? Pointing that out and dissecting it as a term used seems valid as any other point in my estimation

  • @floydblandston108
    @floydblandston108 2 місяці тому +13

    During my rounds as a delivery driver, I once stopped traffic to shuffle some baby skunks off the road. Before I'd even gotten back to my job it had gotten out on local public media. My Boss told me that "we drown them at my campground property", and scowled at me. When I got home, my daughter was red-eyed and weepy and proud of her Father. All I said to her was to remember the "Kantian Moral Imperative", and to make it operational in her life, in whatever form it needed to take.😘

    • @TheMpsmith
      @TheMpsmith 2 місяці тому

      Yes, that reminds me of the woman who got out of her car on the interstate to ensure that the baby ducks made it across the interstate and she got run over by a truck. Seems to me she Kant do that again

    • @floydblandston108
      @floydblandston108 2 місяці тому +6

      @@TheMpsmith - the profound shallowness of your response is instructive. I hope you will reflect on the motive for offering it here publicly.

    • @troywhite6039
      @troywhite6039 2 місяці тому +2

      @floydblandston108
      Your lucky not to have been the means of the baby skunks to express their fear. You might not have come out smelling like a rose.

    • @floydblandston108
      @floydblandston108 2 місяці тому +4

      @@troywhite6039 - yes, I was sprayed. I used a sheet of cardboard as a shield/herding device, but a few strays required minor punting. Baby skunks don't have the oomph of grownups though, and a quick wash of my boots in the mop basin was all it took.

  • @SoutheasternPaCommunityWatch
    @SoutheasternPaCommunityWatch 2 місяці тому +5

    Very good video. Thank you

  • @user-vp1nn2lb8g
    @user-vp1nn2lb8g Місяць тому

    literally sweated a little when i heard, he repeated the same routine for the rest of his life. Truly terrified of him, of how powerful he must've been. He was a free man for sure, not being bounded by his automated habits allowed him to ponder upon such incredible philosophies.

  • @mr_gio7728
    @mr_gio7728 Місяць тому

    Now I'm questioning my self Thank you

  • @LessonsInPhilosophy
    @LessonsInPhilosophy 2 місяці тому +5

    Beautifully made video!
    2 small objections:
    One of your pictures (12:25) does not show Kant, but Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi.
    And: According to Kant, people may be used as a means (bringing a burrito/ sex/ work/ earning money ...), but not *only* as a means, but always at the same time as an end in itself.

    • @r.l.edgington6533
      @r.l.edgington6533 2 місяці тому

      Hello.
      Do you mean driving together to get the burrito? Borrowing money from a Friend to buy burritos(and flowers)? Buying flowers on wedding anniversary... both enjoy sex?

    • @LessonsInPhilosophy
      @LessonsInPhilosophy 2 місяці тому +3

      @@r.l.edgington6533 Hello. Kant considers the individual action. This is moral if it is done out of pure respect for the moral law (= categorical imperative). If the action is motivated by inclinations or expected consequences, it is not moral, but only legal. Only actions that contradict the moral law, i.e. the categorical imperative, are illegal and therefore forbidden. According to Kant, it would therefore neither be illegal to buy a burrito nor to have consensual sex. If you are interested in Kant: I'm currently making a short video series about his ethics on my channel 😉.

  • @alzhin
    @alzhin 2 місяці тому +13

    I like this new, more humorous approach, lol. I also believed for a while that prosperity of humanity stems from individuals rising to higher levels individually, not through changing institutions to produce common good.

    • @LEKSANDER01
      @LEKSANDER01 2 місяці тому +2

      The author Mark Manson, who narrates this video, has that nice humor in all his books, it's great.

    • @Lawrence330
      @Lawrence330 Місяць тому

      Unfortunately, you need the power of institutions to protect the rights of others. Some institutions (existing power structures, capitalists, religious figures) seek to manipulate the minds of their masses, using those masses as a means to maintain power and influence.
      The current fight over abortion access, for example, isn't fundamentally a religious battle, but the religious voters are being weaponized by people who want to control female sexual empowerment. In a country without socialized healthcare, it should be wrong to force a family to birth a truly non-productive child. That sounds harsh, but consider that society accepts none of the burden yet takes the choice of accepting or rejecting the burden away from the mother/parents and their doctors. When institutions are weaponized against humanity, humanity must change institutions to enable freedom of individual choice.

  • @emanueladadarlat3159
    @emanueladadarlat3159 16 днів тому +1

    Given the way he lived his life, it s not that surprising that he had this belief system, which is distorted, yet hard for him to notice that, since his lifestyle was so limited.

  • @michaelelder3945
    @michaelelder3945 14 днів тому

    Great video. I'm glad I stumbled across it. It fills in some gaps in my own personal philosophy with some solid axioms. And thank you Mark Mason - I have subscribed to your UA-cam channel.