($613 Scam?) Why Golden Goose is clowning you

Поділитися
Вставка

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,4 тис.

  • @RoseAnvil
    @RoseAnvil  3 місяці тому +36

    Get the Rose Anvil Lone Bandit camera harness here - bit.ly/3WLwP6q
    Get a Boot Breaker insole here - bit.ly/4dysdad
    or shop the 30% off Scratch & Dent sale here while supplies last - bit.ly/4czzbLz

    • @chaosflower4892
      @chaosflower4892 3 місяці тому

      doesnt vulvanized mean the rubber has just been heat and chemically treated to improve wear? vulvanized soles are still cemented to the upper right?

    • @gsteve8198
      @gsteve8198 3 місяці тому

      Hey Rose can you cut a pair of Hermes Sneakers and let us know if the leather quality is what's advertised and if they're worth the price???????

    • @whatthe6532
      @whatthe6532 3 місяці тому

      @@chaosflower4892careful with the spelling there captain, you may create some unintended humour. The word you were looking for was - vulcanised.

    • @chaosflower4892
      @chaosflower4892 3 місяці тому +1

      @@whatthe6532 may you live long and prosper.

    • @ericrubin8461
      @ericrubin8461 3 місяці тому

      Please do Veja sneakers

  • @GotDamBoi
    @GotDamBoi 3 місяці тому +1436

    these look like something you'd buy at walmart for 19.99

    • @HeadNtheClouds
      @HeadNtheClouds 3 місяці тому +30

      Totally. Like when Chris from Family guy was wearing Teslics from Russia 😅

    • @anibalbabilonia1867
      @anibalbabilonia1867 3 місяці тому +2

      @@HeadNtheCloudslol 😂

    • @logankrause8179
      @logankrause8179 3 місяці тому +4

      As a barefoot shoe wearer...... 😂🤮 them raised heels look terrible 😂 no thanks lol

    • @johnnyxmusic
      @johnnyxmusic 3 місяці тому +4

      Or something you’d find outside of Walmart when someone just got a new pair of Skippys.

    • @Wimb702
      @Wimb702 3 місяці тому +3

      The problem is the people who pay the money for those sneakers. If the brand see that the people pay almost $600 for a sneakers. They will rise the price to $650 next year. Is like apple with the iPhone. That phone don't worth more than a thousand dollars. But while exist people that pays that stupid money for that product, the companies will keep rising the price. Is called supply and demand.

  • @tnductai
    @tnductai 3 місяці тому +326

    the bigger scam is the LV bags with canvas and leather trim, basically a plastic layer on top of canvas and people thought they are getting premium leather 💰💰

    • @gunmetal2445
      @gunmetal2445 3 місяці тому +29

      Don't forget Prada 'Nylon' bags!

    • @roybatty6368
      @roybatty6368 3 місяці тому

      wut

    • @tnductai
      @tnductai 3 місяці тому +6

      @@gunmetal2445 well at least, prada nylon bags is not deceiving, you can tell it's canvas

    • @ashofficial790
      @ashofficial790 3 місяці тому +11

      ​@@tnductaiyou want to know a decieving brand? Look at how saint laurent build their $1100 boots. The heel is plastic and is wrapped in leather veneer to make it looked like stacked leather 😂 100$ shoes have a re

    • @BORIS21610
      @BORIS21610 3 місяці тому +3

      ​@ashofficial790 Unfortunately I do own a vintage one with stacked leather lining is goatskin when I bought them I immediately installed brass toe cap and vibram sole guard and orthopedic leather insole in they are quite old but looking like brand new quality nowadays is extremely declined thats why Monsieur Arnault is the richest man in the Earth.

  • @Stealth86651
    @Stealth86651 3 місяці тому +1492

    >create shoes based off 90's brand
    >Pay celebrities to wear it
    >Print money.

    • @FJB2020
      @FJB2020 3 місяці тому +33

      Yup.. everything is basically an ad campaign..

    • @jbrown7403
      @jbrown7403 3 місяці тому +24

      You forgot > Laugh at all the suckers! 😏

    • @dcallan812
      @dcallan812 3 місяці тому +10

      rinse and repeat., rinse the customers dry. 🤣🤣

    • @12point131
      @12point131 3 місяці тому +5

      Ed Hardy for the 2020s

    • @Zeihara
      @Zeihara 3 місяці тому +11

      If it’s stupid, but it makes you rich, it’s not stupid

  • @SuperTrb0
    @SuperTrb0 3 місяці тому +242

    In college I worked a car dealership and the old guy that trained me said something to me that has stuck with me. I was asking out loud why anyone would buy a car like that, and he replied “there is an ass for every seat”. That stuck with me all these years later. These shoes fall into that category.

    • @RayNLA
      @RayNLA 3 місяці тому +3

      That’s an old saying!

    • @SuperTrb0
      @SuperTrb0 3 місяці тому +20

      @@RayNLA To me as a dumb kid at the time it was new to me and pretty profound. Guy was in his 60s and could sell an Eskimo an ice cube.

    • @diddlybop
      @diddlybop 3 місяці тому +1

      I also heard this while in college from a VC’s son 😂 i still think it all the time, and yes especially when i see fugly shoes 😂

    • @qnunyuh8417
      @qnunyuh8417 3 місяці тому

      lol the shoes are "ass".

    • @qnunyuh8417
      @qnunyuh8417 3 місяці тому

      lol the shoes are "ass".

  • @homie814
    @homie814 3 місяці тому +1016

    Rose anvil should do Rick owens next

    • @MaxiFR
      @MaxiFR 3 місяці тому +15

      For sure

    • @marlonwoods4242
      @marlonwoods4242 3 місяці тому +41

      I think Geobaskets are superior, hopefully they are.

    • @marlonwoods4242
      @marlonwoods4242 3 місяці тому +23

      Specifically mainline ricks, never had experience with drkshdw

    • @96111thomas
      @96111thomas 3 місяці тому +10

      I think people that buy Rick Owens already know.

    • @Whoop-di-scoop
      @Whoop-di-scoop 3 місяці тому +35

      I think Dior should be a good one since they’re being investigated for basically spending $60 on bags and selling them for over $2K

  • @earlofnacho
    @earlofnacho 3 місяці тому +160

    I bought a replica pair of Golden Geese from a Chinese seller on TaoBao for about $70 in 2018 and compared them to retail maybe a year later, when my rich niece-in-law got a pair. I am not kidding when I say that the fakes were better quality than the OG. The seller claimed that they were made with premium calfskin leather and I’m not sure if that much is true, but either way I couldn’t believe it when they were side-by-side. Even my niece thought so and wanted me to get her a pair of the fake ones 😂
    I don’t wear them much anymore, as nowadays I pretty much only wear old skools and boots, but I did wear them for several years on and off and they’re still holding up just fine.
    Shout out to Nina!

    • @earlofnacho
      @earlofnacho 3 місяці тому

      @TripleKmafia oh yeah, for sure. I was all over r/FashionReps since the early days, making google sheets lists and “find” posts (if you were on it back then you’d probably recognize my username there). Yupoo and WeChat are the best for getting the /good/ stuff. Got my wedding shoes from one of those sellers. Been a few years since I dabbled though.. don’t have the time or willpower anymore 😂

    • @rajasharma4282
      @rajasharma4282 3 місяці тому +1

      Is Nina the name of the seller you got the reps from?

    • @sinisterthoughts2896
      @sinisterthoughts2896 3 місяці тому +6

      not really surprised, you'd have to try to make a worse made shoe.

    • @BeforeThisNovember
      @BeforeThisNovember 3 місяці тому +4

      Ayy shout out Nina 😂 I’ve been out the game a year or 2 but I always just used 🐼

    • @thaianle998
      @thaianle998 3 місяці тому

      ​@TripleKmafiaWhat is community name on reddit that you mentioned ?

  • @judgywudgy
    @judgywudgy 3 місяці тому +1834

    So its basically a knockoff converse for short rich people

    • @HeleneLogan
      @HeleneLogan 3 місяці тому +42

      Why the short dig? Some of those wearers are actually tall.

    • @RonnieStanley-tc6vi
      @RonnieStanley-tc6vi 3 місяці тому +140

      ​@@HeleneLogan. The video dude. Watch it.

    • @-Only.Facts-
      @-Only.Facts- 3 місяці тому +74

      I agree, short digs are weak af, nobody can choose their height. I'm average male height 5'9". Dig on something people choose, like being a douche.

    • @johanalejandrocazadordepin7225
      @johanalejandrocazadordepin7225 3 місяці тому +51

      @@-Only.Facts- regardless, it is still for short people.

    • @zionslucky7
      @zionslucky7 3 місяці тому +8

      And here I was interested in this brand & their shoes. Nope nerrmind 😂

  • @autumnzellers3855
    @autumnzellers3855 3 місяці тому +13

    Thank you so much for doing a video on GG. There’s a woman I like to watch for fashion inspiration and she talks about GG sneakers and how great they are. I’m glad I saw this before dropping that kind of money. I really appreciate your channel and all the education you put into how stuff is made.

  • @austinwenger6366
    @austinwenger6366 3 місяці тому +358

    Correction: A beat up 20 year old Hyundai with a Ferrari badge on almost bald tires.

    • @distanteye33
      @distanteye33 3 місяці тому +8

      hyundai actually makes good products now. so not a good comparison

    • @definiteIynotkenji
      @definiteIynotkenji 3 місяці тому +20

      @@distanteye33 hence it being a 20 yr old hyundai not a new one

    • @distanteye33
      @distanteye33 3 місяці тому

      @@definiteIynotkenji so golden goose now makes good products?

    • @bogdantanasa1374
      @bogdantanasa1374 3 місяці тому +4

      ​@distanteye33 hyundai actually made decent cars even 20 years ago.not a fan but they would outlast these damned shoes

    • @definiteIynotkenji
      @definiteIynotkenji 3 місяці тому +1

      @@bogdantanasa1374 not really saying Hyundai didn't make good cars really just emphasizing the key words "20 yr old" in the OC, I probably should have included "beat up" in my first comment as well to have made it more clear.
      OC did miss the ball tho, better analogy would be a Brand-new ChangLi, scratched up, smeared with dirt, with Ferrari badge and Ferrari price tag....

  • @Lord_Mad_Dog
    @Lord_Mad_Dog 3 місяці тому +12

    When I saw these at first IRL, I was pretty intrigued. Then I did some research and found them online. I saw that they weren't cup sole or sidewall stitched and thought something was off for the price. Glad to know I was right. Thanks for the knowledge to come to that conclusion on my own and for finally doing a proper teardown of these to confirm what I thought those few years ago seeing them online. Knowing I can get the exact same aesthetic with better quality from Oliver Cabell is really good to know

  • @petMonster28
    @petMonster28 3 місяці тому +122

    They advertise things like "Made in Italy" and "Handmade" and "100% cow leather" in their description. But what they should say is "Image" and "Fashion" and "Be seen in a pair of Golden Gooses", because material and craftsmanship does not appear to be an accurate selling point.

    • @kurosumomo
      @kurosumomo 3 місяці тому +8

      Like everyone else, same with the rest of clothing. You're looking at a Nike T-shirt, 50€+, but then you can walk into Primark/Penneys and buy a T-shirt for 2.50€ and they have all sorts of T-shirts for that price with different GSM values, from 120g/m2 to 300g/m2, you just don't get the Nike logo or prints, which I prefer. Long gone are the days when I was a brand fanatic for the sake of brand. When it's quality or better quality I might think about spending extra, but for the same or worse things, no chance.

    • @romxxii
      @romxxii 3 місяці тому +3

      @@kurosumomo 50 EUR Nike T-shirt isn't even an egregious example. I'd say high fashion brands like Balenciaga are more annoying. They release a shoe that is basically an Onitsuka Tiger/Asics and then expect you to pay thousands of dollars. And they're not the only high fashion brand to do this. I'm sure I saw a colorum Dunk Low at another fashion brand outlet.

    • @paprika2280
      @paprika2280 3 місяці тому

      @@kurosumomo I buy italian brand linen t-shirts for 150€ each without any logo. Quality is unsurpassed!

    • @Inconnu75018
      @Inconnu75018 3 місяці тому +2

      Diadora Heritage B Berg are made in Italy,with cow leather...thete coast 40 bucks on sale

  • @RicMarBon
    @RicMarBon 3 місяці тому +11

    I live near Brescia where this brand of sneakers has become a distinctive element for the so called “centrini” (= those who hang out mostly in the city centre and pretend to be exclusive or stuff like that). I’m truly thankful for your video

    • @Inconnu75018
      @Inconnu75018 3 місяці тому +1

      Diadora Heritage B Berg are better than Golden goose...

  • @Hunter-wi3fg
    @Hunter-wi3fg 3 місяці тому +114

    Sold these like candy when I worked for Nordstrom. Every affluent stay at home Mom would swipe their card as soon as we had the size

    • @ralphwiggum1982
      @ralphwiggum1982 3 місяці тому +2

      Must be nice lol

    • @colinmurphy2214
      @colinmurphy2214 2 місяці тому

      Gimme that 8.25%

    • @Foreverfriends-h9g
      @Foreverfriends-h9g Місяць тому

      The commission checks bro!! I feel you.. whenever it rains , put the HUNTER rain boots out and it's like they smell them from miles away.. I had to beat customers with the broom. But paid handsomely worth the assault charges. Thanks Nordstrom..

  • @sionyn
    @sionyn 3 місяці тому +68

    Rich people will buy any old crap so long as it’s too expensive for us regular folk.

    • @bossofboss
      @bossofboss 2 місяці тому +2

      fact

    • @Jackie-x4u
      @Jackie-x4u 2 місяці тому +6

      It's actually middle & working class people buying most of the stuff from luxury brands, going into debt to do so. Rich people don't need labels & they don't need to tell people they're rich; they usually know quality and are a lot more subtle.

    • @sionyn
      @sionyn 2 місяці тому +1

      @@Jackie-x4u they buy them coz they see rich celebs wearing them.

    • @Jackie-x4u
      @Jackie-x4u 2 місяці тому

      @@sionynyes, the young celebs, I guess a lot of them came from normal working backgrounds and made it big. They thrive on setting the trends. But for each one or two of these celebs, there'll be, say, 4-5+ million normal young kids wanting to wear the stuff they wear.

  • @sentiasatransformasi
    @sentiasatransformasi 3 місяці тому +36

    I used to be obsessed w golden goose sneakers bcs prime casey neistat was wearing it.. back then I thought it looks really cool.. until I tried them out.. now thanks to channels like rose anvil I managed to educate myself abt leather n the truth abt designer brands

  • @Nataly-17
    @Nataly-17 2 місяці тому +2

    Took 2 years to decide if I wanted a pair. Now i have 2 pairs and i love them 🤷🏻‍♀️ they are cute (imo) and go with everything

  • @cjk5115
    @cjk5115 3 місяці тому +35

    Wow, an overhyped brand I never heard of worn by vacuous celebrities has no quality whatsoever and costs and arm and a leg - color me shocked! Crappy quality and they don't look even remotely comfortable. I'll drop under $100 on a pair of Skechers and be much better off. Great video as always, Weston.

  • @ppandvp
    @ppandvp 3 місяці тому +3

    Bought a couple of Koios after watching the Rose Anvil review. Amazing build quality and comfort! Great value…

  • @LK_EBM
    @LK_EBM 3 місяці тому +127

    These make Common Projects look like a steal

    • @fuelon
      @fuelon 3 місяці тому +2

      Pretty sure these guys proved that Common Project are also shit, right? Unless that’s exactly the point you’re trying to make. Ha I’m sorry it’s late and I’m exhausted

    • @LK_EBM
      @LK_EBM 3 місяці тому +14

      @@fuelon I don't think he's saying that these or Common Projects are shit. Just that they're overpriced. Since both are overpriced, I rather spend $400 for CP than $600 for Golden Goose.

    • @Mastyblasty
      @Mastyblasty 3 місяці тому +3

      ​@@LK_EBM Yeah not necessarily shit but there are better options out there and the price is too high

    • @-defeater
      @-defeater 3 місяці тому +3

      @@LK_EBM they arent "overpriced" unless the only thing you care about regarding shoes is the materials they're made out of. people buy these because they like how they look, they dont care about the materials.

    • @LK_EBM
      @LK_EBM 3 місяці тому +8

      @@-defeater I have Common Projects myself. And I'll admit they are overpriced. But they are one of my favorite sneaker purchase and I wear them so often.

  • @NeoRimeOnline
    @NeoRimeOnline 3 місяці тому +7

    These videos are so gold. Keep expoding these "luxury" products for the scam that they are.

  • @kurtinfl
    @kurtinfl 3 місяці тому +62

    It's almost as if the brand name, Golden Goose, tells you it's all just a fairy tale meant to make money out of nothing.

    • @rezzbuilds8343
      @rezzbuilds8343 21 годину тому

      Reminds me of sham wow! It’s literally in the name

  • @fabrifibraa
    @fabrifibraa 3 місяці тому +22

    I get the negative sentiment, but tbf the quality is really good. My pairs have lasted me for years.

    • @JasonBassettphotography
      @JasonBassettphotography 2 місяці тому +5

      same! mine have traveled with me EVERYWHERE and done everything from going through gold mines to 4 wheelers in Vegas. Good for the gym everyday for me and still holding up. I actually have the exact pair in the video lol
      is it worth 600? of course not in material.. but I like the style, status, and I find them very comfortable. Works for my job doing celebrity events.

    • @jcc8206
      @jcc8206 Місяць тому +2

      I have $20 shoes from Burlington that have lasted years too.

    • @Lacigogne-w8j
      @Lacigogne-w8j 18 днів тому

      ​@@JasonBassettphotography Exactly. The price/quality ratio is a rather short-sighted way to look at things, especially when it comes to fashion. Work environment, design, status, availability of similar products in the market, how you see yourself, and what you want to project-these elements greatly influence a buyer's choice. I came across these shoes without even knowing a celebrity wore them; I just really liked the style and hadn’t seen anything quite like it.

  • @JG-bl4qs
    @JG-bl4qs 3 місяці тому +15

    “Pre worn look” is the stupidest shit I’ve ever heard for clothes, either wear them in yourself or don’t.

  • @AdrienneMint
    @AdrienneMint 2 місяці тому +8

    I bought my pair of GG 4 years ago and i love them. They felt great right out of the box and they did not fall apart in any way. They are my only sneakers. I don’t need more, i love these so much.

  • @fredsvlogandreviews5867
    @fredsvlogandreviews5867 3 місяці тому +3

    This would support the idea that I heard as a child. I remember being told that some times when some thing is a high price you are just paying for the name. This would be an example of that. It was being told things like that is the reason I typically stay away from hype or name brands and go with more affordable or generic. As I said though I have never seen these shoes, like ever.

  • @BruceRichardsonMusic
    @BruceRichardsonMusic 3 місяці тому +2

    LOVE IT. Thanks for exposing the hucksters. No one needs bad shoes.

  • @triptychlux
    @triptychlux 3 місяці тому +57

    600 dollars for off-brand converses lol

    • @markm0000
      @markm0000 3 місяці тому +6

      A fool and their money will be soon parted.

    • @Belovelyava
      @Belovelyava Місяць тому +1

      Right? How do they get away with it? I honestly thought they WERE Converse when I first saw them

  • @srenzilla
    @srenzilla 3 місяці тому +17

    I am a footwear designer for a major sportswear brand, a few things I would note on these:
    -the heel lining material could be an extremely premium synthetic (it might not be but synthetic leathers can be as or more expensive than traditional leathers) maybe could be cool to speak more about handfeel and abrasion resistance there vs a torch.
    - the built in heel lift to me seems to effect the silhouette pretty drastically. Some of the another shoes you showed that are better value have a pretty boxy shape vs the super low profile silhouette of the golden goose thangs. I imagine the lift is to make the shoes feel closer to an Oxford dress shoe.
    -brand is everything for fashion product like this, definitely challenging to quantify that, sort of the price of artwork in my eyes.
    Love the Channel, fun to see inside so many shoes!

    • @brainmatic9851
      @brainmatic9851 3 місяці тому +3

      I guess you could say scamming is an art 🤣💀

  • @zachtan
    @zachtan 3 місяці тому +127

    For $600 you could get 3 pairs of Olukai sneakers with way more genuine leather, and 3 pairs of superfeet insoles for EACH sneaker

    • @LK_EBM
      @LK_EBM 3 місяці тому +1

      @@zachtan Are Olukais good for $150? What leather do they use and where are they made?

    • @RyTrapp0
      @RyTrapp0 3 місяці тому +5

      You could get 4 pairs of Thursday sneakers with $60 left over lol. And get significantly more, higher quality(Horween) leather in each pair. Wild.

    • @zachtan
      @zachtan 3 місяці тому +4

      The Olukai upper is some kind of treated full grain chrome tan (which they market as water-resistant), and the lining on the ankles and counter cover are also some kind of full grain. They’re made in Vietnam - Weston has cut them open on his channel before.

    • @3clubforever
      @3clubforever 3 місяці тому

      @@LK_EBMolukai offers an Italian leather sneaker for under $150. They are awesome

    • @DA-lk5np
      @DA-lk5np 3 місяці тому

      But Olukai is also an overpriced shoe marketed to a certain type of person...

  • @JasonHindley
    @JasonHindley 3 місяці тому +10

    I own a pair of the Superstars and the quality/durability is actually great. They've lasted for years! Probably wouldn't pay full price on these though - they've gotten a little more expensive over the years.

    • @MrAvenger1975
      @MrAvenger1975 2 місяці тому +2

      I own 3 pairs (2 Superstars, 1 HiStar) and I think they're great. I frequently wear my HiStars.

  • @GOD999MODE
    @GOD999MODE 3 місяці тому +6

    I bought a pair of Ball Stars about a year ago under the impression that they actually use some premium leathers. They are positioned as Italian luxury fashion.
    The sneakers themselves ran extremely narrow and 1 full size long. I found them to be extremely uncomfortable to walk in for any reasonable length of time without some pain and fatigue. A miserable experience trying to break them in. Forget it if you have a normal to wide foot shape. I had to sell them.
    Not worth more than $150 IMO.
    Edit: Thanks for exposing the brand and please continue to expose more Italian lux footwear!

    • @Alienspecies635
      @Alienspecies635 3 місяці тому

      150$ ? 😂 dude these are like 40$ shoes

  • @calimahappy
    @calimahappy Місяць тому +1

    I’m from the South of France and this is the brand of rich people kids. It looks like a Converse knock off but 6 times more expensive (and more depending on where you live)and those kids parents buy them a LOT.

  • @gordonc920
    @gordonc920 3 місяці тому +36

    My upstairs neighbor worked for the equity firm that bought Golden Goose. I had one conversation with him and I asked him why his company was shelling out so much to acquire it when the shoes are so low quality in comparison to other luxury goods, and all he said was "because idiots keep buying them".

    • @Lacigogne-w8j
      @Lacigogne-w8j 18 днів тому

      "Weirdly enough, these same idiots-or at least the vast majority of them-can actually afford them, so they must be doing something right in life. Plus, your statement is like telling someone who has the means to buy a Porsche to get a Honda Civic instead, just because they both drive. You’d have to be the one not be very smart to ask him such a question.

    • @gordonc920
      @gordonc920 17 днів тому

      ​ @Lacigogne-w8j I don't have a problem if people want to buy these shoes with their own money, rather I was surprised that this customer base's perception of value is so different from mine. I also don't agree with your analogy about cars - a pair of golden goose isn't a Porshe, its more like a Honda Civic with a star painted on the drivers side door (but at 4x the cost of a regular Honda Civic).

    • @Lacigogne-w8j
      @Lacigogne-w8j 17 днів тому

      @@gordonc920 yeah right

  • @schizo0223
    @schizo0223 3 місяці тому +6

    These were really popular in Korea starting in 2012.
    (In Korea now, if you are still wearing these, then you look like you don't have a clue. You are stuck back a decade.)
    They were like $240-80 back then.
    My wife had them she wore it for awhile. Kept them in storage.
    Then sold them to one of those "used luxury shops" a couple of years ago and basically got her money back.
    Unless they are totally beat up and the soles all worn down and the rubber showing, selling used Golden Goose is really good for the seller, because the product looks used in the first place.

  • @benwea76
    @benwea76 3 місяці тому +98

    The only thing dumber than a new pair shoes that look used is the people who buy them.

    • @RayNLA
      @RayNLA 3 місяці тому

      Heyyyyy! 😂

    • @zygmuntthecacaokakistocrat6589
      @zygmuntthecacaokakistocrat6589 3 місяці тому +2

      & Ron DeSantis.

    • @tommyw.9424
      @tommyw.9424 3 місяці тому

      ​@@zygmuntthecacaokakistocrat6589those Golden Gooses might be expensive, but DeSantis' time in your head isn't. Rent-free!!

    • @Mr.Marbles
      @Mr.Marbles 3 місяці тому

      like bro just wear them lmao

  • @roystonfurtado8871
    @roystonfurtado8871 Місяць тому +1

    Been wearing them regularly for 3 yrs. Comfortable and durable. Leather quality is soft.

  • @Entertainment-
    @Entertainment- 3 місяці тому +7

    For $120 you can get the Stan Smith Lux with chrome tanned leather, 360 degree stitches cup sole and leather lining and sole.

    • @Saligia88
      @Saligia88 3 місяці тому +1

      That's all true. They just look different.... Basically, you can dress completely for $100 and even have some change left over.

    • @Lacigogne-w8j
      @Lacigogne-w8j 17 днів тому

      @@Saligia88 heck for 30 bucks if you thrift..

  • @silasmortensen1129
    @silasmortensen1129 3 місяці тому +9

    It is just for fashion.... quality never mattered. Lous Vuitton or Zegna doesnt make better quality suits or luggage than any midtier brand.

    • @BigDirtDawg
      @BigDirtDawg 3 місяці тому

      False, Vuitton makes high quality products for sure.

    • @krisevans4379
      @krisevans4379 3 місяці тому

      ​@@BigDirtDawg i mean yes but the mark up is crazyyyyy

    • @johnpark7972
      @johnpark7972 2 місяці тому

      Zegna suits are actually amazing though
      And don’t bother with LV luggage just get Rimowa or Tumi

  • @StAustin101
    @StAustin101 3 місяці тому +15

    Is Wes reading our minds? I was traveling for work and last night saw a bunch of young rich dad’s wearing these shoes around the hotel lobby. I joked with my family I should trade in my Hey Dudes for some Goose. I think not. I would rather buy a pair PNW boots or multiple pairs of Jim Greens.

  • @ROCKSTAR3291
    @ROCKSTAR3291 3 місяці тому +5

    I know a guy who works for a boutique luxury fashion store in a high end mall, and he said they only needed a few sales a day to stay afloat. The profit margin must be crazy high.

  • @schen3
    @schen3 3 місяці тому +36

    Never heard of this brand! :0

    • @evenjohansen4584
      @evenjohansen4584 3 місяці тому +4

      Me neither! Pre-worn-look sneakers?! Pff!🙄

    • @schen3
      @schen3 3 місяці тому

      @@evenjohansen4584 hahaha yeah!

    • @banditpandit
      @banditpandit 3 місяці тому

      @@evenjohansen4584 This makes three of us look like silly people.

    • @DDD893
      @DDD893 3 місяці тому +1

      Me too. But now I want them! Hopefully I already have worn shoes. So I'm almost a celebrity

  • @Mellowbaton
    @Mellowbaton 3 місяці тому +1

    Saw a family that wandered into a golden goose store at my local mall one time. I’ll never forget the look on the store clerk’s face when those toddlers started picking up those shoes and rolling them around.

  • @edition_8923
    @edition_8923 3 місяці тому +3

    I was at Selfridges London last time, I was browsing, and I picked a pair of GG. I looked inside, I removed the insole, and I started laughing. The sales assistants looked at me in a weird way; I'm sure they had no idea why I was laughing. I actually call the lining "used towel" lol
    Philippe Model does the same thing, but I find their sneakers to be slightly better quality, and they charge £300 unstead of £600 for GG.
    Your work is valuable, and I highly appreciate it, but unfortunately, Golden Goose will still make sh*t lots of money because people are all about hype and looks, and no one cares about quality.
    I hope you'll do Rick Owens sneakers soon!

  • @RollinLeonard
    @RollinLeonard Місяць тому

    it's been a while since i checked in on this channel and damn the editing, graphics, and macro shots are so good now! hope you get a billion trillion views so you can go crazier. nice work. impressive.

  • @justmy2pesos
    @justmy2pesos 3 місяці тому +30

    Those shoes are the Kardashians of shoes. Worthless, cheaply made, no style, no quality, yet celebrities want to be seen with them!

  • @TimeMcTraveller
    @TimeMcTraveller 3 місяці тому +1

    Thank you for calling out this BS!

  • @tericottaclay9462
    @tericottaclay9462 3 місяці тому +74

    Knowing Bobby Lee buys these, let's you know that it's all hype. 😂

    • @GOD999MODE
      @GOD999MODE 3 місяці тому +4

      Just because you follow Bobby Lee, doesn't mean people weren't wearing these before. Plenty of people swear by Golden Goose. Personally, I tried them out and hated them.
      Not worth the money... at all. Also, uncomfortable, narrow, and probably bad for your foot health.

    • @HippoOnABicycle
      @HippoOnABicycle 3 місяці тому +10

      "Can I just say something? Okay? About the golden goose thing? Okay? See the thing is is that..."

    • @del_99
      @del_99 3 місяці тому

      I was thinking that the whole way though , I HOPE they talk about in on bad friends and Andrew just rips him for it 😂

    • @jamaladams7640
      @jamaladams7640 3 місяці тому

      Same here😂😂😂😂

  • @Lionelj
    @Lionelj 3 місяці тому

    Thanks for shedding light on poor quality shoes charging exorbitant prices. Appreciate your work

  • @hollabackgod
    @hollabackgod 3 місяці тому +4

    Went to Europe early this year. I knew this brand was a scam, went inside a Golden Goose store somewhere in Milan and saw a sign board for their after sale services.. it costs somewhere around $80-$100USD just to let a person from the store to purposely scuff up the shoes for that worn down look…

  • @jeffblahblah5226
    @jeffblahblah5226 3 місяці тому +2

    I love your honesty. Keep up the good work!

  • @chaosflower4892
    @chaosflower4892 3 місяці тому +32

    the goose that lays the golden eggs for Allessandro and Francesco.. they remind me of the garbage watch brands like MVMT.
    I'd rather wear Diadora or Puma.. though Puma increasingly faking the sidewall stitch e.g. slipstream, ca is a bit crappy. Those two shoes would be great with a real stitch..

    • @coalhair99
      @coalhair99 3 місяці тому +1

      Good point & the Puma is a 6th of the price & i’d bet would last as long as these crummy, overpriced jokes

  • @DarkroomDrifter
    @DarkroomDrifter 3 місяці тому

    Corrected grain leather is the best for white shoes. The multiple layers of pigment give extra protection against staining vs semi aniline and its single layer pigment.
    Semi aniline is more breathable and has the natural grain but more prone to staining.
    Corrected grain is the best fit for purpose leather if you want to ensure maximum whiteness for longer. Also corrected grain has less wastage and you can use all of the hide, so more sustainable in the less wastage aspect but also more economical on scale.

  • @ComboSlicer
    @ComboSlicer 3 місяці тому +9

    Their superstars are hands down comfiest sneakers I have ever owned, have rather narrow foot. Yes they are overpriced I get it but as a sneaker itself in my opinion they are not bad by any means. Also I prefer the worn look because getting "600 buck pristine shiny white sneakers" will get scoffs and dirt really fast but on wornout look you do not care about it.
    If toes were forced forward against shoe then one simply has too small size.

  • @mh369
    @mh369 3 місяці тому +1

    i have worn those kind of shoes for over 15 years now (my average price is 270usd for a pair). started with phillipe modell and when golden goose came out i used both brands, for me they are almost the same. The fat insole, will squish down and will make a very if not most comfortable feel after wearing them for a year or so. the biggest issue I had was the glue of the sidepart and the heel separating on various models. also the sidepart gets hard and brittle after stepping into special dirt like oil or other chemicals. to sum up, the most comfortable shoes for me with this look, but they fall apart on the sole too soon...far better quality than converse btw...

  • @CreativeUsernameHere-r1k
    @CreativeUsernameHere-r1k 3 місяці тому +13

    For 600 you can buy a good northwestern boot... and maybe get it shipped even to europe... maybe. And as for europe... oh boy you can get probably a custom made leather jackboot in east europe

  • @logo_13
    @logo_13 3 місяці тому +5

    I think the main selling point of this shoe just like with pretty much any designer sneaker is the design.

  • @yungman3049
    @yungman3049 3 місяці тому +7

    Surprised it took so long for you to look at golden goose! One of the most outrageous pricing on goofy sneakers that has been going on for years

  • @tevzuss4386
    @tevzuss4386 Місяць тому +1

    I'm literally wearing the exact same model while watching this 😂
    Thanks for the video, but I still love them 👍

  • @the6ig6adwolf
    @the6ig6adwolf 3 місяці тому +12

    I'm only 6'5 and women don't pay attention to me so now my plan is to buy some trashy overpriced shoes that'll make me 6'6 and then wait for the ladies to flock.

    • @bradleyjohnson1546
      @bradleyjohnson1546 3 місяці тому +1

      Brother if you’re 6’5 and getting zero attention from women you have much room for improvement elsewhere in your appearance

    • @the6ig6adwolf
      @the6ig6adwolf 3 місяці тому

      @@bradleyjohnson1546 I do?

    • @TheGardengroove
      @TheGardengroove 3 місяці тому +1

      @@bradleyjohnson1546 i believe you might have missed a joke here somewhere

    • @bradleyjohnson1546
      @bradleyjohnson1546 3 місяці тому +1

      @@TheGardengroove that’s appears to be the case

  • @AznGotUpz
    @AznGotUpz 3 місяці тому +6

    ron desantis insoles… killed me 😂

  • @TheTempestSync
    @TheTempestSync 3 місяці тому +2

    This might be very niche but I'd like to see some reviews and cut-in-halves of some weightlifting/powerlifting belts, most companies claim genuine leather and suede, I think it would be great to see how some belts are made and what kind of quality they are.

  • @the_guy300
    @the_guy300 3 місяці тому +24

    why does it feel so illigal to be this early on a rose anvil video💀💀

  • @timcameron9023
    @timcameron9023 3 місяці тому +1

    The belt sander scuffing 'pre worn' look says it all - utter pretense

  • @JeredtheShy
    @JeredtheShy 3 місяці тому +5

    I feel like 20 years or more ago the high fashion brands at least looked special, they were either well-made or delicate but beautiful, now they just laugh in your face with stuff that is obviously Payless shoes quality for $600. Somebody in East Asia got paid pennies to rough those shoes up and make them "pre-worn", and then the alien weirdos who buy this crap dutifully line up to fight each other over a pair. Here's a white t-shirt, $300, and they chase it like dogs. Getting pretty fed up with it.

  • @steveb4012
    @steveb4012 3 місяці тому

    Another excellent video, keep on showing the poor quality these companies are asking such high prices for.

  • @Deibote
    @Deibote 3 місяці тому +13

    Maybe it’s just a status symbol. These girls are soooo wealthy so above everyone else that it’s nothing to them to spend 600 on garbage.

    • @rodafowa1279
      @rodafowa1279 3 місяці тому +6

      Actual wealthy people don’t wear trash like this (unless they’re being paid). Stuff like this a “status symbol” to people who want to give off the impression they’re “cool” or something, while struggling to pay their rent every month.

    • @sleepmore8587
      @sleepmore8587 3 місяці тому

      @@rodafowa1279 i know a few people who wear golden goose and they are not struggling to pay rent. i don't get the hype, but they say they are super comfortable and of course they like the brand name. some rich people actually do love logos and showing off, money can't buy taste.

    • @zhisu2665
      @zhisu2665 3 місяці тому +9

      @@rodafowa1279 not true

    • @rodafowa1279
      @rodafowa1279 3 місяці тому

      @@zhisu2665 Prove me wrong. Show me a billionaire wearing Jordan’s or something.

    • @f1beg
      @f1beg 3 місяці тому

      That's a good point, the celebrities wearing these are so above and beyond wealthy the price truly doesn't matter, it objectively means nothing to them so if they like them they buy them. For anyone else it's an insane purchase

  • @Stefan9745
    @Stefan9745 21 день тому +1

    There’s a better alternative for those also a bit cheaper and to me prettier, the Premiata Steven. Would like to see your review on pair of those!

  • @lbgstzockt8493
    @lbgstzockt8493 3 місяці тому +14

    People will really spend $600 on the least interesting sneaker imaginable

    • @lawliet6910
      @lawliet6910 3 місяці тому +4

      Uninteresting really is the best descriptor for them!

  • @faintclapofthunder
    @faintclapofthunder 3 місяці тому +1

    Thought their sneakers and all that were nice pre pandemic and saw the price tag and immediately exited their site. Seen them more and more throughout the years and never the less glad I never spent any money on them.

  • @joshuapatrick682
    @joshuapatrick682 2 місяці тому +5

    12:45 honestly maybe it’s just my inner cynicism but the people that can afford these don’t care that they’re built cheap and designed to fail. It’s just a status symbol, nothing more.

    • @Lacigogne-w8j
      @Lacigogne-w8j 17 днів тому

      lol, facts. Style and design for me. Couldnt care less about status. Most of people I am around wouldn't even know their price or the brand to begin with.

  • @BabakPA
    @BabakPA 3 місяці тому

    People who buy these shoes are why this statement makes so much sense! “There is a sucker born every minute” thank for the video

  • @kurosumomo
    @kurosumomo 3 місяці тому +4

    They look OK for $70 on sale, like the Vans I buy. There's no force on this planet that will make me spend $100+ on Vans, Converse, Adidas, Nike, Puma, etc. and these.

    • @ifwecouldvote
      @ifwecouldvote 2 місяці тому +1

      Well there is actually. It's called inflation. 😁

    • @Lacigogne-w8j
      @Lacigogne-w8j 17 днів тому

      ​@@ifwecouldvote Or becoming wealthy, you know... like wealty people would choose to buy a Porsche instead of a Honda Civic, even though they both get you from point A to B.

  • @atmavictu2995
    @atmavictu2995 Місяць тому +1

    It would be nice to cut in half even more expensive shoes sold by Loro Piana and Brunelli Cucinelli, which are the two top brands for Italian clothing

  • @michaellk2254
    @michaellk2254 3 місяці тому +3

    7:40 your editor is really funny. Lots of good sillies in this one

  • @azole3197
    @azole3197 2 місяці тому

    I own one. The sole gave up after few months of daily use. No complaints but i will not buy again from this brand but will buy again white shoe from common projects because i love the silhouette very much

  • @notnoaintno5134
    @notnoaintno5134 3 місяці тому +11

    Trendy bs, as are most expensive snkrs

    • @edmontoncouple1562
      @edmontoncouple1562 3 місяці тому +2

      and there are a lot of braindead fans and hypocrites are willing to buy them just to be IN the circle.

    • @axeavier
      @axeavier 3 місяці тому

      @@edmontoncouple1562 you could say the same about nike, it's shown countlessly on this channel that they make garbage but people want that swoosh to be cool

  • @danielnewton2390
    @danielnewton2390 3 місяці тому

    The graphics team is really going wild recently. Keep up the great work RA!

  • @adurnaebrithil
    @adurnaebrithil 3 місяці тому +42

    Imagine not only paying top dollar for something that is so cheaply made, but also buying something that looks used. What an abolute joke.

    • @nickl9451
      @nickl9451 3 місяці тому +9

      What, like ripped jeans

    • @Javdoc
      @Javdoc 3 місяці тому +4

      like an "aged" guitar?

    • @user-oz5xb9ed3w
      @user-oz5xb9ed3w 3 місяці тому +1

      or buying a shoe with a big star on it in the first place. yikes.

    • @patatr4943
      @patatr4943 2 місяці тому

      @@user-oz5xb9ed3w What shoes do you wear, one with a big swoosh or 3 stripes on them?
      I believe golden goose does a great job in utilizing new kind of materials and creating unique designs.

  • @makiss.2597
    @makiss.2597 2 місяці тому +1

    I dunno - I've had mine as my main everyday shoe for 5 years now... no joke its still going strong. Common Projects last 2 years - tops. Seems like a lot of haters here who I suspect can't afford expensive shoes.

    • @lucyl4603
      @lucyl4603 2 місяці тому +1

      They’re for a niche audience though. I got mine seven-eight years ago after reading that grandmas swear by them, I then got the winter version, too. 10/10 for my bad posture lol

  • @Carlos-nu6ik
    @Carlos-nu6ik 2 місяці тому +6

    As someone who owns two pair of Goldens I can tell you that feel wise they do seem (at least to me) better than my sambas. Now, for me the selling point was not the quality, it was the distressed effortless style (which for most is going to sound dumb). Im fully self-aware, tho I love mine.

    • @mlee77
      @mlee77 2 місяці тому

      I share your sentiments as an owner of a few GGDB. While the quality is not top notch now we know, somehow the feel, fit and comfort of GGDB beat my adidas hands down. And its look.. i’d say no brand out there can yet replicate that. That said, the quality of my latest pair is starting to look dubious, probably my last to own..

  • @meghanh71
    @meghanh71 2 місяці тому +1

    GG not really cool anymore, way too popular with soccer moms at this point… but I used to have a couple pairs years ago (work in luxury and got them super discounted) They’re very comfortable (much more than other high end brand sneaks I’ve tried) and mine wore very well 🤷🏼‍♀️

  • @daleincisions
    @daleincisions 2 місяці тому +3

    thought this was Converse at first glance ,Star icon is not so original

  • @wayneoneill5265
    @wayneoneill5265 3 місяці тому +1

    Wow, 500 million in sales! Until this video I had never heard of them.

  • @MaineMan2023
    @MaineMan2023 3 місяці тому +19

    I can’t believe that Nike hasn’t sued them for the star on a sneaker. Nike owns Converse.

    • @Cranberry__man
      @Cranberry__man 3 місяці тому +2

      It looks a lot different from converse star

    • @IblewuponyourfaceIII
      @IblewuponyourfaceIII 3 місяці тому +5

      Aaah 🤷🏻‍♂️ I mean who says you can put a star on a shoe. Nike/Converse doesn’t own the rights to the 5 pointed star 😂

    • @MaineMan2023
      @MaineMan2023 3 місяці тому

      @@Cranberry__man in particular, the Converse star is almost the exact same color and it is a 5 pointed star. The question on trade mark is are the two marks possibly confusing to consumers. As a lawyer, I think a judge could easily rule that is an infringement of the registered Converse mark.

    • @Cranberry__man
      @Cranberry__man 3 місяці тому

      @@MaineMan2023 but all the converse logos are a star in a circle or a star with an arrow! I just really think these are different and nobody will think they are converse 😂

    • @sinisterthoughts2896
      @sinisterthoughts2896 3 місяці тому

      @@MaineMan2023 converse star is in a white circular badge, also their star always seems to have a point cropped. that is plenty to avoid a suit, but yeah, it's an obvious ripoff.

  • @rafaeltorres2460
    @rafaeltorres2460 3 місяці тому

    Your work is what consumers need!

  • @bicyclelife7088
    @bicyclelife7088 3 місяці тому +2

    It's a $100 shoe that is made for rich people to look poor. It's the biggest marketing scam. You are better to buy a pair of Adidas or Puma for $100 and be better off.

  • @stbalabis
    @stbalabis 3 місяці тому +2

    spent half the original price on these, i just keep it on the shelf for display. 🤣 kidding aside, worn it on our christmas trip, and it was killing my feet. eventually bought a Vomero and just kept the GG in the bag. 🤦🏽‍♂️ RW 875 broken in more easily than GG. 🤣

  • @xkr2
    @xkr2 3 місяці тому +2

    The thing about golden goose is that although all their main model/collection types are similarly priced, the quality and the thickness and the finish varies across the collections.
    My first pair was from the Stardan collection and I had absolutely no complaints about the built quality n leather. And then I ordered the exact same shoe you are reviewing here. This is from the Superstar collection which is supposed to be the most worn out looking collection, and I returned it back right away. The quality looked horrible compared to the first pair I owned from the other collection. Sole was terrible, the insides were literally exactly like u described… like some cheap car cloth. And the leather looked low quality. I believe with the superstar collection, they r intentionally going overboard with that worn out look. Definitely not for me.
    Having said that, I love their Stardan collection. Would be nice if you could review those too. Very different. Especially the ones that aren’t designed excessively worn out. Still not worth the price but a huge difference in material quality compared to Superstar collection.

  • @duckman-rs6pj
    @duckman-rs6pj 3 місяці тому

    kay love the video but oh my GOD the editing???? it’s so satisfying and smooth so idk if you did it or if you have an editor but PROPS TO THEM 👏👏👏

  • @GoingMenthol
    @GoingMenthol 3 місяці тому +5

    Imagine spending $600 to look homeless

  • @sshah2545
    @sshah2545 Місяць тому

    I like seeing average people buy these shoes. It’s one things for celebs to do it as a marketing or endorsement stunt, or just because they have stupid FU money.
    For the average person, it’s great. It’s like a public, visible, declaration of extreme stupidity. And then you know to avoid them like the plague. So grateful, thank you. Keep buying products like these.
    Women’s purses and electric watches are some of the best examples out there

  • @szbyzan
    @szbyzan 3 місяці тому +6

    More like $19.99

  • @rainer4ever
    @rainer4ever 20 днів тому +2

    Can you please do a video on Bally shoes whether it be dress shoe or sneaker. Bally is known for their shoe craft since the beginning of their brand and I would really like to see how they compare and the forensics

    • @Pawcio2115
      @Pawcio2115 19 днів тому

      I'd love to see it too

  • @djking44151
    @djking44151 3 місяці тому +4

    So, when Rose Anvil making us a decent sneaker then 😅

  • @michael1882yt
    @michael1882yt 3 місяці тому

    Thank goodness for Rose Anvil.
    Keep telling it like it is brother!
    🤜💥🤛

  • @evenjohansen4584
    @evenjohansen4584 3 місяці тому +6

    These "high fashion" shoes are _pathetic!_

  • @scavvy1
    @scavvy1 3 місяці тому

    I really liked the close up shots of the interior of the shoe.

  • @ben7932
    @ben7932 3 місяці тому +4

    How have they not been sued by Converse? There's even a star on the side!

    • @RayNLA
      @RayNLA 2 місяці тому +1

      Look again…It’s not a star!

  • @Davidmtv98
    @Davidmtv98 3 місяці тому

    Loved the analysis for a brand you see everywhere nowadays specially that I never would pay +600 for a beat up shoe! Crazy that they get away with it but you realize how effective marketing and consumism may be