What is a Part 36 offer? UK General Litigation

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 сер 2024
  • Are you a litigant in person, running your own case?
    For our book, "Flying Solo", a comprehensive guide on how to run your own claim, please click here:
    courtwingman.com/shop/
    To receive more guidance, legal surgery etc. (£150), or for further details of our services generally, go to:
    www.courtwingman.com
    hello@courtwingman.com
    Tel: 0207193 5572
    Please note that Redwood Legal has ceased to trade. We have set up a new service tailored towards litigants in person, Court Wingman Limited. (For full representation we can still help you too, through our partner law firm.)
    Knowing when and how to make offers in civil litigation can be a tricky business, especially since there is the special Part 36 procedure under the CPR, which is rather more complex than a normal "without prejudice" offer. Yet it is crucial to understand this type of offer in fast track and multi-track claims.
    +44 020 7620 6265
    info@redwoodlegal.co.uk
    Our website: smallclaimstrack.co.uk. / www.redwoodlegal.co.uk

КОМЕНТАРІ • 49

  • @jessejackson8127
    @jessejackson8127 3 роки тому +21

    Ever considered being a lecturer? You’re much better orator & a teacher than my Civil Lit tutors for my BPTC!
    This was very well organised using simple language, thank you!

    • @RedwoodLegal
      @RedwoodLegal  3 роки тому +6

      Thank you :) It's this sort of encouragement that keeps me going, it really does. I would love to lecture, one day, as staring at myself in a camera in a coffee shop can feel a bit strange sometimes! ;)

    • @connernehemiah6733
      @connernehemiah6733 3 роки тому

      Instablaster

  • @darrencollings
    @darrencollings 2 місяці тому

    Learned more From this chap in 3 videos than I have in 3 years with everyone else I see dropping information bombs All over the place

  • @venusssharman5922
    @venusssharman5922 3 місяці тому

    Hi Alex, its fabtasctic people like you who make me want to study law. Incidentally, i have in my posession your 2020 edition, Flying Solo. Introduction - Life in the skies... perfectly brilliant!

  • @hkr_5559
    @hkr_5559 3 роки тому +8

    Well explained in layman's terms and also useful for my civil litigation exam on Tuesday! Thank You.

  • @nicholaslewis862
    @nicholaslewis862 Рік тому +2

    Phenomenally concise and clear explanation. Thank you so much!

    • @RedwoodLegal
      @RedwoodLegal  Рік тому +1

      You are very welcome. :)

    • @Headhand-qd9so
      @Headhand-qd9so Рік тому

      @@RedwoodLegal What happens if a claimant increases the value of their claim before they make a part 36 offer? Would that justify making an offer at a later stage.

  • @grengren2
    @grengren2 3 роки тому +3

    That's explained it much better then my Solicitor did. Thany you.

    • @RedwoodLegal
      @RedwoodLegal  3 роки тому +1

      Glad to be of assistance :) Thanks, RL Team

  • @Scorchio-
    @Scorchio- 2 дні тому

    Great explanation. Thx :)

  • @WiredcontactCoUk
    @WiredcontactCoUk 2 роки тому +1

    Excellent video, clear and concise whilst also being balanced.
    I loaned £100k with 20k facility fee - the conveyancer who mediated and received funds between us and respondent made significant mistakes and being SRA regulated their insurers have been placed on notice.
    Your math was spot on, presentation professional and we wish you well for this investment in demonstrating the prowess of yourselves. Thank you

  • @aothman979
    @aothman979 2 роки тому +1

    You have made my day.

  • @revisionreader1922
    @revisionreader1922 8 місяців тому

    much appreciated!

  • @danamery4247
    @danamery4247 3 місяці тому

    great video

  • @MarcusMIDI
    @MarcusMIDI 3 роки тому +1

    Very useful and informative :)

  • @borntodoit8744
    @borntodoit8744 4 роки тому +4

    CPR PART36 is designed to encourage each side to settle for less than their claim (to avoid lengthy costly litigation).
    PART36 only applies to fast track and multi-track (not small claims track)
    If C offers D under part36 then
    If C wins at trial (D loses) Then C wins normal amount +D pays an extra penalty (for not settling early when they had chance)
    If C loses at trial (D wins) then D wins normal amount

    • @RedwoodLegal
      @RedwoodLegal  4 роки тому +2

      I thought I was meant to be the expert! I have a contender...

  • @eltel4397
    @eltel4397 2 роки тому

    This man excellent 👌

  • @zahraa.Erbili
    @zahraa.Erbili 3 роки тому +1

    informative video thanks :)

  • @Eatcrow
    @Eatcrow 7 місяців тому

    What about costs claims under section 52 of the Courts Act 1971 when a case is withdrawn? And the previous defendant then becomes the applicant in the subsequent costs action
    Also can an offer be a “section 36 offer” if it is not explicitly named as such and has a 14 day expiry date rather than a 21 day expiry date?

  • @yy5123
    @yy5123 3 роки тому

    I have been disputing a bill from my solicitors firm and pointing out there mistakes they made which cost me substantial amount of money, they issued court proceedings and made ‘ not part 36 offer’ I need some advice on that.

    • @RedwoodLegal
      @RedwoodLegal  3 роки тому

      By all means - you can email us on info@redwoodlegal.co.uk

  • @akikalkhoran
    @akikalkhoran 4 роки тому +1

    Minute 2:20 still nothing about part36 other than spilling cereals once you see p36.
    Thanks for your time

    • @RedwoodLegal
      @RedwoodLegal  4 роки тому +3

      It is a nearly 20 minute video and I like to talk with my viewers too.

  • @kalam518
    @kalam518 3 роки тому

    So in effect, where C wins at trial:
    C successful with their p36= massive fees for them
    D successful with their p36= massive savings on fees payable to C
    So there’s isn’t really a situation where C would have to pay D’s cost in the above unless D won at court?

    • @RedwoodLegal
      @RedwoodLegal  3 роки тому +1

      Perhaps not massive but substantial enough to make a difference. Defendant Part 36 offers cane even more substantial. I go into the topic in more detail in my new book, "Flying Solo":
      www.lulu.com/en/gb/shop/alex-woods-and-nate-fakes-and-kinga-stabryla-and-kinga-stabryla/flying-solo/paperback/product-m5yqjq.html?page=1&pageSize=4

    • @kalam518
      @kalam518 3 роки тому

      @@RedwoodLegal much appreciated for the reply !

  • @borhanuddin3779
    @borhanuddin3779 7 місяців тому

    I claimed for £5000 and last week I received a DQ form from my defendant and he mentioned mediation service. Please , Can you tell me is it sign of positive?

    • @tlangdon12
      @tlangdon12 5 місяців тому

      Yes, it's positive because they are open to trying to resolve the issue. During mediation, you can put your point of view and they can put theirs, so at least you understand each other. You probably won't agree with them, but you have information about how they will try to argue their case.

    • @borhanuddin3779
      @borhanuddin3779 5 місяців тому

      @@tlangdon12 Thank you so much 🙏🏻.
      Now it says DQ filed on 14/02/2024.
      What does it mean?

    • @tlangdon12
      @tlangdon12 5 місяців тому

      @@borhanuddin3779 DQ means Directions Questionnaire. If this is not a questionnaire that you have completed, then it is one that has been filed (sent to the court) by the other party in the case. You should have received a questionnaire to complete yourself and should be sent a copy of the one that has been filed by the other party so you can see what they think. Have a look at the DQ by searching the Internet for Court Form N180.

  • @KingHazard
    @KingHazard 3 роки тому

    Isn’t it up to 10?%? On top of the base rate I mean...

    • @RedwoodLegal
      @RedwoodLegal  3 роки тому

      If you mean the amount of a no win no fee success fee - no. It is up to 100% of base rate. Not quite clear on your question, though.

  • @quannguyen-il5kf
    @quannguyen-il5kf 2 роки тому

    Some segments in the video are stamped not adjacent to each other

  • @talkttalk2010
    @talkttalk2010 4 роки тому

    Confusing

    • @RedwoodLegal
      @RedwoodLegal  4 роки тому

      It is not the easiest thing to wrap your head around. It's probably better explained in the "Flying Solo: How to Represent Yourself in Court" book.

  • @Maverick-re3zp
    @Maverick-re3zp 3 роки тому

    Thanks sexy

  • @jamied8385
    @jamied8385 Рік тому

    I’m not to sure weather to take my part 36 offer .. it’s through the MiB .. I’ve got till 19th