2027 US & UK Carrier Groups vs 2027 Russian & Chinese Carrier Groups (Naval Battle 137) | DCS

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 1 сер 2024
  • In the sixth and final installment of our 2027 carrier group battle series, the US and UK take on China & Russia. US & UK use F-35 with SPEAR 5, SPEAR 3, MAKO, Meteor & AIM-260 missiles. China and Russia use J-35 with Zircon, YJ-21, YJ-18, YJ-12, PL-15 & R-77M missiles.
    Mods: • Free DCS Mods (download links in the relevant video)
    Mods: www.currenthill.com/
    Queen Liz Mod:
    - www.digitalcombatsimulator.co...
    - digitalcombataviators.com/
    PATREON: / grimreapers
    0:00 Intro
    1:05 Addressing Viewer Feedback/Complaints
    5:15 Scenario Overview
    7:08 Scenario Details
    11:50 Predictions
    12:11 Battle!
    51:10 Where Next?
    USEFUL LINKS
    GRIM REAPERS (UA-cam): / @grimreapers
    GRIM REAPERS 2 (UA-cam): / @grimreapers2
    GR PODCASTS: anchor.fm/grim-reapers
    DCS TUTORIALS: / @grimreapers
    DCS BUYERS GUIDES: • DCS World Module Quick...
    DONATE/SUPPORT GRIM REAPERS
    MERCHANDISE: www.redbubble.com/people/grme...
    PATREON monthly donations: / grimreapers
    PAYPAL one-off donations: www.paypal.me/GrimReapersDona...
    SOCIAL MEDIA
    WEBSITE: grimreapers.net/
    STREAM(Cap): / grimreaperscap
    FACEBOOK: / grimreapersgroup
    TWITTER: / grimreapers_
    DISCORD: / discord
    THANK YOU TO: Mission Makers, Admin, Staff, Helpers, Donators & Viewers(without which, this could not happen) xx
    #GRNavalBattle #DCSNavalBattle #F35 #J35 #FC31 #MAKO #Zircon #HypersonicMissile #5thGen #Stealth #GR #DCSWorld #Aviation #AviationGaming #FlightSimulators #Military #DCS
  • Ігри

КОМЕНТАРІ • 758

  • @jonatanNaslund
    @jonatanNaslund 22 дні тому +191

    I love how cap got so distracted with the summary at the end that he missed a mako salvo that took out a 055😂

    • @LukeBunyip
      @LukeBunyip 21 день тому +7

      All the words, all the things....

    • @PrecisionClays
      @PrecisionClays 21 день тому

      @@LukeBunyip A teaching moment... :)

    • @Glasmortal
      @Glasmortal 21 день тому +5

      Welcome to Cap's distraction movement.
      You do not need to know things. Mostly the things Cap says, you do or do not need to know. Until he says so.
      Smiley face with a wink inserted here.

    • @bohan9957
      @bohan9957 20 днів тому +1

      Where did the 055 got taken out?

    • @MaxwellAerialPhotography
      @MaxwellAerialPhotography 19 днів тому +3

      The PLAN getting punked literally at the last minute is pure comedy gold.

  • @LuisVasquezMusic
    @LuisVasquezMusic 22 дні тому +161

    I swear cap should be a sports announcer. You bring so much more energy and excitement and it really enhances the experience of watching these battles. Even the pauses for tea convey how much exited you are.

    • @fuzzblightyear145
      @fuzzblightyear145 22 дні тому +5

      Ha! yeah. It was like listening to the horseracing

    • @jerseyshoredroneservices225
      @jerseyshoredroneservices225 22 дні тому +3

      Auctioneer for military aircraft LOL

    • @Glasmortal
      @Glasmortal 22 дні тому +2

      Love the idea! Seriously.

    • @Glasmortal
      @Glasmortal 22 дні тому +1

      Adding another idea. Cap using his voice to make building LEGO's for children. My goodness it would have it been awesome at the time!

    • @stevensonDonnie
      @stevensonDonnie 22 дні тому +2

      A red carrier get hit,
      Cap “GOOOOOOOAAAL,”

  • @willwozniak2826
    @willwozniak2826 22 дні тому +185

    The AIM 174 B is in service...the Navy announced it the other day.....they are breaking her in at RIMPAC 2024....These naval battles keep getting better...👉🏻

    • @christopherchartier3017
      @christopherchartier3017 22 дні тому +2

      How many can the Hornet carry?

    • @thatwormhole1760
      @thatwormhole1760 22 дні тому +15

      @@christopherchartier3017 2 I think, due to weight, and pylon size.

    • @christopherchartier3017
      @christopherchartier3017 22 дні тому +12

      @@thatwormhole1760oh. Well, it’s better than nothing I guess. Hopefully the F-15EX can carry more

    • @Echowhiskeyone
      @Echowhiskeyone 22 дні тому +35

      @@christopherchartier3017 Max is 5 by size and weight, 2 under each wing and 1 centerline. But it most likely cannot land with 5 on a carrier due to weight. Normal is expected to be 4 heavy load, 2 normal load with 2 external tanks. This is from a recent Sandboxx video on the AIM-174B.

    • @user-yw4rx6kb3r
      @user-yw4rx6kb3r 22 дні тому +1

      How will these jets work when us aircraft carrier are sunk?

  • @SuperAd1980
    @SuperAd1980 22 дні тому +49

    This is the fight we were all waiting for.
    Go team UK 🇬🇧
    ... i suppose team US can tag along and help a little too.

    • @TatohOne
      @TatohOne 22 дні тому

      Keep talking smack vs the US and we might have to toss your tea into the ocean again. 😂❤

    • @dragondude6984
      @dragondude6984 22 дні тому +1

      Lol yeah

    • @michaelccozens
      @michaelccozens 22 дні тому +3

      Sounds like both World Wars in a nutshell!

    • @hallo84
      @hallo84 4 дні тому

      Basically `MAKO and AIM 260 are not in service as of now and probably will not be in service with the numbers used in this scenerio... while china currently fields 8 type 055 with its carrier fleet and probably 4-8 more in 2027 giving it a lot more punch in offence.

    • @SuperAd1980
      @SuperAd1980 3 дні тому

      @hallo84 and can you confirm how many "working" missiles they have? Or working launchers?
      The China record isn't great.
      The UK and US has the same problems too, but that was back in the 70's and 80's.

  • @stormraptor1216
    @stormraptor1216 22 дні тому +33

    The chinese losing another ship to the makos at 53:40 and cap not seeing it was too funny, also would love to see a 2030 series

    • @MaXwellFalstein
      @MaXwellFalstein 21 день тому +1

      Perfectly timed to "my brain is just mush at the moment."

    • @MaxwellAerialPhotography
      @MaxwellAerialPhotography 19 днів тому

      The PLAN getting punked literally at the last minute is pure comedy gold.

  • @dace0326
    @dace0326 22 дні тому +51

    Honestly you could start selling at auctions 😆

  • @FlyingWithSpurts
    @FlyingWithSpurts 22 дні тому +173

    Big difference is this, this represents 100% of Russian Carriers, 100% of Chinese Fujians (they could have two more Kuze class carriers)... While only representing 50% of the British QE class and 10% of US Nimitz class (still have a Ford class), so even a perfect trade that costs the "blues" more money is still a strategic victory for the "blues"

    • @mike_y0st
      @mike_y0st 22 дні тому +69

      I’d love to see a video of….100% US strength vs 100% Chinese + Russian just to see….how overwhelmed the Reds would get

    • @mayorwest3265
      @mayorwest3265 22 дні тому +16

      ​@@mike_y0st another vote for this

    • @FlyingWithSpurts
      @FlyingWithSpurts 22 дні тому +34

      @@mike_y0st I don't think DCS will run a 100% USN fleet.

    • @totalNERD-eo7wx
      @totalNERD-eo7wx 22 дні тому +16

      @@FlyingWithSpurts Yeah... That is like, 70 Arleigh Burkes...

    • @reaperbsc
      @reaperbsc 22 дні тому +6

      Yeah. That would awesome. But the game can't handle that scale, unfortunately.

  • @livethefuture2492
    @livethefuture2492 22 дні тому +24

    Man i sure do love these big Red v Blue carrier battles!
    Thanks for doing these, it really gives a perspective on what modern pitched naval warfare might potentially look like, which can be hard for many of us as most of it takes place beyond visual range anyway. Showing it in these simulations with this much detail and work put into it is really helpful and greatly fascinating and enjoyable to watch. So Kudos to you man!

  • @CllrP
    @CllrP 22 дні тому +17

    Never mind the CPU being over worked, I think Cap’s brain had broke by about the time the QE was hit 😂

  • @bushweasel
    @bushweasel 22 дні тому +21

    Cap had me on the edge of my seat the whole time. This was awesome! Good thing we have 12 carriers.

    • @larrypopwell8034
      @larrypopwell8034 15 днів тому

      I have no idea what I just watched or how I ended up here but……. Go BLUE!! I just watched the whole thing 😂

  • @LEH-fl8ws
    @LEH-fl8ws 22 дні тому +52

    So, taking into account the whole series, it seems that the Western offence is strongest, with Britain impressing in particular. The Russians also seem to have improved (if only by a little), and the American Mako seems nigh on unstoppable, as does the UK Spear 3 and Spear 5 combo. The semi-ballistic hypersonics like the Zircon and YJ-21 do seem to struggle to get a consistent PK, and maybe that's fairly realistic, what with missile failure rates and jamming.
    I would love to see Indian, French, Thai and mixed Spanish/Japanese/Italian groups make appearances in battles. Loving the series, can't wait for the next series. I would love to see Type 31e, VLS launched LRASM in particular.
    Maybe it could be a one-off, but have you thought of trying a series of engagements between CSGs? Many of these carriers can fire their weaponry from much longer ranges - the YJ-21 is a great example. You could have a long range engagement, then use whichever vessels survive (assuming the carrier is still operational) face off in a closer range battle. I'd love to know if this is feasible, if not, don't worry!
    If I could ask for one thing, I'd love to see a Type 31e frigate for the UK, with CAMM-MR and CAMM-ER dual-packed and quad-packed in its Mk41 VLS respectively. I think that the medium range potential of these weapons could really bolster the British defence, without going as far as to bring in the Type 83s this early.
    Loving the videos Cap!

    • @ChristopherMallonMusic
      @ChristopherMallonMusic 22 дні тому +8

      I love the concept of the Spear 3. It's basically a decoy, but it's one that will rough you up a bit if you ignore it.

    • @totalNERD-eo7wx
      @totalNERD-eo7wx 22 дні тому +2

      Boy do I have good news for you - Admiral189 has been working on Italian CSG assets and will release them any day now! I hope CH will do the weapons, otherwise GR unfortunately might not consider them.

    • @AMOUREDD
      @AMOUREDD 22 дні тому

      Well I'm sure u know that's not a zircon missile

    • @ArizonaAstraLLC
      @ArizonaAstraLLC 22 дні тому +4

      ​@@AMOUREDD there isn't a graphical representation of the 3M22 Zircon in DCS yet, so basically they make the P-800 just fly faster and change the way it behaves. It's the same thing for when DCS models the Fujian Chinese aircraft carrier - you will notice it's actually an American Nimitz-class aircraft carrier, because DCS at this time also does not have a graphical representation of the fujian

    • @johnsilver9338
      @johnsilver9338 22 дні тому

      Its fun, but this simulation don't showcase the 100% capability of US forces more likely due to limitations in DCS. In real life though there is still JASSM/LRASM and NSM/JSM, air-launched SM-6 or AIM-174B, AARGM-ER that can also be used for anti-ship role, maybe even SiAW. MALD decoys too and StormBreaker (SDB II) which is the US equivalent of Spear 3. Patriot PAC-3 MSE also are gong to be dual pack into Burke's Mk 41 VLS.

  • @livethefuture2492
    @livethefuture2492 22 дні тому +23

    I wouldn't mind watching a Realistic Naval battle even as just a one off experiment...maybe you can hype it up as a 'war game/simulation' if you want to attract some viewer attention. Or if that's too boring, perhaps some kind of specific mission simulation. Like maybe a coordinated bomber strike against a chinese carrier group, or a one on one surface duel between two surface vessels, or a combined arms operation in support of an amphibious landing, or you know some kind of unique mission setting like that could be pretty cool as well.

  • @TheC-130
    @TheC-130 22 дні тому +61

    I'm surprised that the MIG-29s lasted so long, both in operation and in combat

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  22 дні тому +26

      They have been over-performing in this series, no idea why, I haven't changed them.

    • @ArizonaAstraLLC
      @ArizonaAstraLLC 22 дні тому +6

      ​@@grimreapers If they're modeled after the MiG-29KR/K/MiG-29M2, I guess they're working. The Indians and Egyptians seem to like theirs.

    • @Dimitris_Datseris
      @Dimitris_Datseris 20 днів тому +1

      @@grimreapers how about the upgraded Zumwalt class capable of carrying 12 hypersonic missiles ?

    • @junreycabalida5256
      @junreycabalida5256 14 днів тому

      @grimreapers since it is a game,can u simulate these.
      2 US CSG vs 1 CHINA CSG and hypersonic missile barrage

  • @wyvernthefox9683
    @wyvernthefox9683 22 дні тому +10

    Honestly I think the fight would have been a lot more... adrenalin based if USA and China didn't try to engage the supersonics going for their allies. I feel a large majority of the US net was wasted and that was the reason Britain was still able to defend themselves at the end while USA had nothing left.
    Still a jaw dropping mission, held my breath during parts of it.

    • @ArmUkraine
      @ArmUkraine 13 годин тому

      but it is realistic. In real life howevr the allies would win the air war at much further distances, meaning that they would win by just launching makos while the chinese and russians could do nothing. especially becuase russian air defense irl is much worse and the mako can manouever unlike russian and chinese hypersonics.

  • @Kevin-hb7yq
    @Kevin-hb7yq 22 дні тому +2

    A valued simulation.
    Cheers!

  • @tbe0116
    @tbe0116 22 дні тому +25

    The US Navy is trying to field the new MACE anti ship missile by 2027. It’s like a longer range spear 3.

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  22 дні тому +23

      Yup already working on it for 2030 battle.

    • @hertzwave8001
      @hertzwave8001 22 дні тому

      @@grimreapers If there is anything in the rumor mill for REDFOR to have in that timeframe put those on the checklist as well

    • @hertzwave8001
      @hertzwave8001 22 дні тому

      does china have any new weps in the pipeline for the 2030+ timeframe besides more carriers?

    • @tbe0116
      @tbe0116 22 дні тому +2

      @@grimreapers You’re the best!

    • @OG_Mac79
      @OG_Mac79 21 день тому

      @@hertzwave8001 They were said to have scrapped the new e-radar so something has to be in the works to replace it. They are working on making the missile work better on stealth too from the last leak that had a lot of details right about the aircraft changes.

  • @masterhighground3677
    @masterhighground3677 17 днів тому +1

    28:02 "It's too big, there's too much, it's too pookoo, there's not enough foo foo!" poetry, truly
    But seriously these battles with Cap's commentary are more exciting than any football game

  • @Jim93905
    @Jim93905 22 дні тому +2

    Outstanding!!!

  • @Bfizzle62
    @Bfizzle62 21 день тому +3

    DCS must not have the best AI because it feels hard to believe that stealth aircraft with longer ranged missiles would ever fall to 4th gen aircraft

  • @TheOgres3DForge
    @TheOgres3DForge 22 дні тому +6

    Have you considered an AMBUSH series. For example A not currently war torn Russia launches an attack on Alaska coast to take out material outpost, and or vice versa the US launches an attack on the Crimean peninsula. Similar scenarios could work for locations in the South China Sea.
    Focus on near peer conflict with overwhelming support. Could be a 2 fold series of Defense and Counter Account to recoup beachheads.
    Crimean Peninsula could also go with EU surprise attack for a theme as well.

  • @davidn381
    @davidn381 22 дні тому

    Enjoyed that!

  • @haire618
    @haire618 22 дні тому +6

    Nothing I don't like with DCS when it comes to the F-35 is it doesn't use its electronic warfare nor does it use the decoy

    • @hughmungus2760
      @hughmungus2760 21 день тому +4

      EW just isn't modelled properly at all in DCS. Both China and the US have dedicated EW aircraft which would make a big difference to the accuracy of long range missiles.

  • @packd6
    @packd6 22 дні тому +5

    My initial thought is doing the long-range/milsim/tactical battles. It sounds like the 2030s stuff is getting built in the background and ready in the winter, anyways. In this last battle series the 5th gens are sort of programmed to run in to one another, but having AWACS, tankers, maybe some P8s looking for subs between the two carriers while stealth pops in and out would be something new and exciting. Maybe releasing a 30-45 minute action packed video and a full-length director's cut version of those would be nice.

  • @bohan9957
    @bohan9957 22 дні тому +2

    This is like watching a sports match. Absolute enjoyment.

  • @tbe0116
    @tbe0116 22 дні тому +47

    A real US vs China carrier battle would include the USAF B1s and B21s firing tons of Lrasms long before the carriers got in range of each other.

    • @christopherchartier3017
      @christopherchartier3017 22 дні тому +20

      True, that’s why the videos are entertainment, not factual. It’s just comparing the assets available to carrier groups only

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  22 дні тому +28

      If you're going to include B1/B-21 then you have to start adding Chinese H-6J etc.

    • @hawk2222
      @hawk2222 22 дні тому +5

      @@grimreapers I mean if your PC don't explode why not?

    • @JenosIdallian
      @JenosIdallian 22 дні тому +12

      @@hawk2222 Probably because, as he's stated before, several times, long range "off map" fights that include ordinance fired at well over stand-off range doesn't make for a good video.
      Yes. You could theoretically put a full U.S. Carrier Battle Group against a full Chinese Carrier Battle Group, but given just how one sided that would be, that doesn't make for entertainment. It makes for a stomp. This is meant to be fun, not a tactical display of each countries "truest capabilities." I think people are mistaking what Cap does here as military strategy instead of what it actually is... entertaining.

    • @tbe0116
      @tbe0116 22 дні тому +1

      @@grimreapersdefinitely

  • @shortroundoifusmc1589
    @shortroundoifusmc1589 22 дні тому +5

    The video of all videos has arrived!!! Thank you

  • @captnjack69
    @captnjack69 22 дні тому +1

    Great job Cap !!

  • @ThomasBrucefye
    @ThomasBrucefye 22 дні тому +3

    Don't forget if this battle happens far enough away from friendly places to land and you lose the aircraft carrier, you also lose ALL the planes it launched as well.

    • @ProjectVRD
      @ProjectVRD 7 днів тому

      Even with fully comp the insurance company would make you take a Cessna 172 as a courtesy

  • @Warlord9000
    @Warlord9000 22 дні тому +39

    This was like a knife fight. No one wins, you just loose less.

    • @MilitaryTechNerd006
      @MilitaryTechNerd006 22 дні тому +3

      Bro just described a US-China war

    • @livethefuture2492
      @livethefuture2492 22 дні тому +3

      once the fancy stuff dries out, and the real attrition of war sets in...yeah it pretty much is a loose-loose.
      its just becomes a matter of who looses more than the other.

    • @MilitaryTechNerd006
      @MilitaryTechNerd006 22 дні тому +2

      @@livethefuture2492 thats basically what would happen if any of the 3 superpowers went to war. People like to fear monger by saying "tensions are higher than ever" or that "(insert superpower)'s new weapon would anniahlate (insert superpower 2)!" Even though, all3 countries are not going to go to war because they know they would nearly gauranteed lose their superpower status and more than half their military if they went to war, not to mention the threat of nuclear weapons.

    • @Belisarius1967
      @Belisarius1967 22 дні тому

      @@MilitaryTechNerd006 I think there's only two superpowers right now maybe India in 20 years time will make it three. Russia's just nukes everything else is .......

    • @andrewbogard2411
      @andrewbogard2411 22 дні тому +8

      ​@MilitaryTechNerd006 I mean to be fair there is arguably two super powers and one that tries to punch above it's weight class. Arguably the two superpowers are the US and China , then you have Russia who used to be a superpower but since the quality of their forces have been shown to be extremely poor as of late they have dropped from that status and try to punch above their weight class.

  • @timblack6422
    @timblack6422 22 дні тому +1

    Love it when you get excited!

  • @kenhelmers2603
    @kenhelmers2603 22 дні тому +1

    Oh hell yeah! What a battle! Great work GR, just f;in great. Yes to the 2030 battle! and of course, a realistic one too!
    You do such great work Cap/GR it's your own fault we want it all :) Luv ya!

  • @joshberry4813
    @joshberry4813 22 дні тому +1

    Epic…absolutely epic.

  • @justifiablyhuman
    @justifiablyhuman 22 дні тому +5

    Is it too much to ask for both? I'd like to see this series continue, as is, projecting further into the future. But I'd also be interested in more realistic carrier scenarios. Something like, more of the former with a bit of the latter sprinkled in as time allows with no real pressure. Just my 2 cents.

  • @liamh7383
    @liamh7383 19 днів тому +1

    Loved this!! Would like to see the “real life” sim that cap mentioned though. That would be interesting to see how the fleet would really do it. Keep up the stellar work 👍🏻

  • @rickjames18
    @rickjames18 22 дні тому +1

    Great battle!

  • @thediscernist1606
    @thediscernist1606 22 дні тому

    Spectacular!

  • @edwardsoto7046
    @edwardsoto7046 22 дні тому +3

    That was so much fun to watch.
    I know that takes a lot of effort and time on your part so thank you very much.

  • @mildmanneredthinkingman9323
    @mildmanneredthinkingman9323 22 дні тому +3

    NGAD and missiles! Definitely want more of these!

  • @danhodson7187
    @danhodson7187 22 дні тому +2

    This is the one I've been waiting for!!

  • @chrisvinicombe9947
    @chrisvinicombe9947 22 дні тому +3

    Awesome battle so much boom boom. ❤

  • @stevensonDonnie
    @stevensonDonnie 22 дні тому

    Brilliant!

  • @TrevorSiders
    @TrevorSiders 22 дні тому +2

    Love the commentary.

  • @nathanchristensen824
    @nathanchristensen824 21 день тому

    Damn fine entertainment Cap! Thank you!

  • @Pablo668
    @Pablo668 21 день тому

    Interesting battle. Great commentary.

  • @TimberHog
    @TimberHog 22 дні тому +2

    Can't wait to see this one!!

  • @neil168
    @neil168 22 дні тому +2

    That was fun!
    I like the realistic battles Cap.

  • @williammacrae6119
    @williammacrae6119 22 дні тому +2

    Brilliant

  • @idle_betazoid1990
    @idle_betazoid1990 22 дні тому +1

    Another great battle

  • @eaches
    @eaches 22 дні тому +7

    How is "WORDS AND STUFF AND THINGS ARE HAPPENING" not on a t-shirt?

  • @RommelsAsparagus
    @RommelsAsparagus 19 днів тому

    Very impressive!

  • @stayathome3634
    @stayathome3634 21 день тому

    Wow, nice!

  • @crackyflipside
    @crackyflipside 22 дні тому +2

    That aircraft battle in the beginning was very fun to watch.

  • @KI5IJB
    @KI5IJB 15 днів тому

    I don’t watch sports and I just realized this fills that niche in my life. Thanks Cap!🎉

  • @jovianr9498
    @jovianr9498 21 день тому

    Great video, Cap.

  • @John333Scout
    @John333Scout 22 дні тому +4

    Man i feel like if the US didnt try to intercept for the UK and let them just defend themselves they would have had more SM-6's and might have been able to defeat most of the missiles and saved a few ships. I also find it very odd why the blue team performed that badly in the air to air fight. No way in hell the J-35 is as good as they say and as good as the F-35 and what is with the PL-15 kill percentage vs the blue air to air missiles. Their PL-15 cannot be that much superior in kill per shot.

    • @hertzwave8001
      @hertzwave8001 22 дні тому

      in all fairness russia did waaay better in the last video than the paper stats say against china. compounding that with the results being able to vary quite a bit in different games makes things very interesting

    • @johnsilver9338
      @johnsilver9338 22 дні тому

      More likely its DCS limitations. Also if I remembered correctly cap buffed up J-35 otherwise it won't be fun he said on an older video. Or I may be wrong.

    • @hughmungus2760
      @hughmungus2760 21 день тому

      PL15s are actually extremely good at ranges between 20-50nm because they are basically burning the entire time.

    • @John333Scout
      @John333Scout 21 день тому +1

      @@hughmungus2760 yeah but so are AIM 260s and they miss a lot more in DCS... Actually they burn longer and go further so that doesn't really make sense/.

  • @TimvanderVelden-dp3fs
    @TimvanderVelden-dp3fs 22 дні тому +4

    I would personally love to get the realistic battles. It would be very interesting to know how realistic carrier combat works.

    • @randlebrowne2048
      @randlebrowne2048 17 днів тому +1

      They could always accelerate the time during slower sections.

  • @hughmungus2760
    @hughmungus2760 21 день тому +1

    Also I did some reading on the specs. the Mako only has a warhead of around 60kg and travels slightly faster than mach 5. This is about the same as the R37, somehow I just don't see how something on the scale of the R37 could actually sink a 80,000ton carrier

  • @MamLewis
    @MamLewis 22 дні тому +2

    There's a book series called Axis of Time, about a modern Carrier fleet being sent back in time to 1942. One of the ships is a French cruiser armed with cruise missile ends up in the hands of the Japanese. In the second book, they use it to disable all the defences at Pearl harbour, leading a way to a Japanese invasion. Would love to see a recreation of that in DCS.

  • @CommieCat-c6q
    @CommieCat-c6q 10 днів тому

    Cap was spitting absolute BARS! Great job man, rest your voice. You earned it

  • @kisscola
    @kisscola 22 дні тому +1

    Wanna express my honest appreciation for this excellent entertainment.
    This is exactly, what I love about sports and commentary.
    Best regards from Germany

  • @jerrycallaio5130
    @jerrycallaio5130 22 дні тому +1

    WOW! Just One Of The Best SIMS Yet!

  • @glynnmbebee
    @glynnmbebee 22 дні тому +1

    This was one of your best videos ever! I appreciate so much the work you do to give us such awesome videos.

  • @PhoenixT70
    @PhoenixT70 20 днів тому

    I’d personally love to see a one-off throwback to some of your older videos-the CVN v. Star Destroyer ones. They’re part of what brought me to the channel in the first place, so seeing a current or near future carrier group in that scenario would be very cool. Other than that, I’ll vote for the next iteration of carrier battles. It’s not realistic, but it sure is fun to watch.

  • @FunnyQuailMan
    @FunnyQuailMan 22 дні тому +6

    Why no LRASM? They're absolutely going to be in use, and in MUCH greater numbers, in 2027 & beyond. And, apparently, like Constellations will have NSM, Arleigh Burke are to add canister launchers on-deck which can fire LRASM (among other things) to make up for some of the VLS tube difference after all Tico cruisers are fully retired.
    And how about HALO & HACM? They're both different programs, and both apart from MAKO.

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  22 дні тому +8

      I'm just getting better results with MAKO than LRASM.

    • @MilitaryTechNerd006
      @MilitaryTechNerd006 22 дні тому

      ​@@grimreapers cant wait for the C-3 Variant😮‍💨

    • @FunnyQuailMan
      @FunnyQuailMan 22 дні тому

      @@grimreapers That's a good reason. One might say the best reason. Thanks for the response!

  • @User54tr
    @User54tr 22 дні тому +3

    I think you should do some videos with smaller battles like it would be interesting to see 1 arleigh Burke go against 1 052
    Another idea would be to do a war series where there are different battles and some either lean to the advantage of the US or China and they are tallied to show who would win in the different theaters of war. These could be ground and naval battles and they could be long range or close range. Ex a US submarine engaging with Chinese ballistic missiles that are land based

  • @sweatybotfn9982
    @sweatybotfn9982 21 день тому +2

    Two things I heard from sources for before 2030: YJ-18 has terminal pull up and Burke III is supposed to be able to carry more ESSMs

  • @strambino1
    @strambino1 21 день тому +2

    Maybe in between the 2030s carrier group and this current iteration. You could do a 90’s carrier group battle US versus Russia, including the Kirov on Russian team and the Iowa on US team. It would just be a fun little throwback.

  • @glynnmbebee
    @glynnmbebee 22 дні тому +2

    In response to your query, I'd love to see more realistic long-range engagements. Just a thought, maybe they actually wouldn't be so long if you allowed yourself to speed up certain boring periods. I agree the close-up slug fests are cool, but I always find myself wondering how things would turn out with more realistic tactics, as much as you could simulate, anyway. For example (of many) it kills me to see Mako enter theater in small batches after watching China and Russia pretty much throw in everything at once. I think the longer format, if better applied tactics, would be a superior video. But with that said, would you need to ask NCIS for permission? Sorry, couldn't resist. Hope all is well on that front. Thanks for all you do. You are my main media content source. My fav streaming entertainment.

  • @SmilingCamperVan-dd8cb
    @SmilingCamperVan-dd8cb 22 дні тому +1

    Awesome play by play! Grim Reapers naval battles is better than any sports match!

  • @WilliamSudek
    @WilliamSudek 22 дні тому +2

    I would watch a realistic version of this.

  • @AxlePlaysGames
    @AxlePlaysGames 22 дні тому +3

    I would love to see a realistic battle, even if it was only a one-off USA+UK vs Russia+China, as it would show a much more accurate image of which nation's gear is better.

  • @StupidStuff135
    @StupidStuff135 21 день тому +1

    I think realistic tactics carrier battle would make a great video and i would love to see. My first thought was the range advantage of the tomahawks, fired from far away long in advance they might not be arriving to the battle so long after the red missiles like in the short range battles. But if its as slow as cap made it out to be it might not be the most watchable series to do every combination of red v blue. Excited to see either way. And definitely looking forward to the 2030's updated carrier groups.

    • @hughmungus2760
      @hughmungus2760 21 день тому

      if commanded by a human player, the fleets can properly assess the threat and react proportionately. If they see a flight of slow tomahawks coming the player could command all but one ship to hold fire to conserve ammo.

  • @Four9sFineJewelry
    @Four9sFineJewelry 22 дні тому +2

    Cap, you’ve missed your calling as a Mexican Fũtball commentator.
    GREEEAAT video!!! This should be made into a movie

  • @telemarkaeology
    @telemarkaeology 21 день тому +1

    In a way, this video is super optimistic. It presumes that China and Russua will still have functional economies, that the USA hasn't descended into myopic isolationism, and that the UK still has a functional carrier. Heyo!😅

  • @RedTSquared
    @RedTSquared 21 день тому

    Thank you Super Cap for all the work you put into these Wargames for us to enjoy! Yoeman's Work indeed!

  • @rowanpeacock3304
    @rowanpeacock3304 22 дні тому +1

    oh no this fight is gonna be crazy

  • @JHF80
    @JHF80 22 дні тому +6

    Who would have thought, Lofoten in the center of so many conflicts. 😅

  • @GalacticTommy
    @GalacticTommy 21 день тому

    This was a fantastic video! Very intense the whole time!!!

  • @richardjoseph9002
    @richardjoseph9002 20 днів тому

    Love the passion and commitment you put into these. Thank you!

  • @ArizonaAstraLLC
    @ArizonaAstraLLC 22 дні тому +1

    Not a sports fan but man I was watching this like people watch the Super bowl or the world cup hahaha love this series

  • @toasty1641
    @toasty1641 22 дні тому +7

    I have been loving this series I cant wait for the 2028 instalment with new tech such as the AIM-174B, HALO ASM and maybe the Peregrine AAM/ASRAAM for the US

  • @swayzefan3600
    @swayzefan3600 22 дні тому +4

    the AIM-9x block 2 is specially built for the f-35 in that it is stealth along with its pylon. tests have shown it doesn't increase RCS at all. is it possible to integrate this into the game?

  • @Greenamus
    @Greenamus 22 дні тому +1

    MATE has anxiety issues 😂😂

  • @BluegrassKnight
    @BluegrassKnight 21 день тому +1

    I think the future series would be more entertaining, but I really like most of your battles regardless, this one was one of the greats though!

  • @bobhawkey3783
    @bobhawkey3783 22 дні тому +1

    Dude, you always have a job as an auctioneer. Awesome commentary!❤

  • @dexlab7539
    @dexlab7539 12 днів тому

    Brilliant Brilliant Brilliant battle - thanks Cap!! 🎉

  • @jerseyshoredroneservices225
    @jerseyshoredroneservices225 22 дні тому +1

    Wow a lot of thought and work went into setting this up.
    Halfway through I'm wondering what will give out first, the cpu or the voice???
    Good luck!

  • @huntermurphy2148
    @huntermurphy2148 22 дні тому +2

    Something else thats important to note here. The US has a lot more undamaged CSGs to use again. Thats Russia's only carrier, and China's is irreplaceable. That spells a lot of trouble for the long term for Red here.

  • @totalNERD-eo7wx
    @totalNERD-eo7wx 22 дні тому +1

    Gotta love how the Hornets get one last MAKO jab in on a Type 55 at the very end

  • @shawnfolwell5906
    @shawnfolwell5906 18 днів тому

    Both sound great I love ure channel

  • @EeekiE
    @EeekiE 22 дні тому

    Love the passion and energy in this one. Never change.

  • @timpaxandtimpu
    @timpaxandtimpu 20 днів тому +2

    The thing is that a Russian 2027 carrier group doesn't exist, yesterday the postponed their repair date of the only Russian carrier, the Kuznetzov, it's repairs have been postponed from finishing in 2024 to 2028,

    • @ryabow
      @ryabow 17 днів тому

      they're still trying? i thought they had officially written it off.

  • @knightmarethe1st
    @knightmarethe1st 22 дні тому

    Brilliant match. Love the commentary. It's funny how the red team lost 2 carriers and still the blue team almost matched them in cost.

  • @LucidF0rmula
    @LucidF0rmula 22 дні тому +3

    i would love to see a realistic version of this exact scenario!

    • @hughmungus2760
      @hughmungus2760 21 день тому

      ideally with human admirals commanding each fleet

  • @skatman3278
    @skatman3278 22 дні тому +3

    Fantastic series this. Great fun. The only thing I'd say is the Meteor has been nerfed WAY too much.

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  21 день тому

      I had a lot of people claiming it was OP so we've slowly been nerfing it until people stopped complaining. It's a tough balance.

    • @skatman3278
      @skatman3278 21 день тому +1

      @@grimreapers it possibly was a little bit OP, but when you did that testing it was in comparison to the other missiles at the time. From memory, it was one of the first "GR" missiles you guys created so comparing it to stuff like the 120C it would appear massively OP (because it is), but then comparing to things like the 260 et al, shows it's now underpowered. Even including the modern missiles it's still apparently (according to Wiki, MBDA, and a few others) got the largest NEZ on the market. Appreciate the top speed is likely less than them and range probably a little bit less, but it's still a top tier missile.

  • @Bristowned
    @Bristowned 19 днів тому

    Alright, hear me out: exact same battle except there are no teams. America vs Britain vs China vs Russia. Mass chaos.
    Also, this was a very fun video to watch!

  • @tyronejackson002
    @tyronejackson002 21 день тому +1

    The carrier point defense should be able to handle a couple of leaked misiles .. rolling air frame (42) essm(16) phalanx(3) great video as always😃

  • @exidy-yt
    @exidy-yt 21 день тому

    2030s CBG battles please! These 2027 ones were insane amounts of fun!

  • @billseventy6825
    @billseventy6825 22 дні тому

    Wooowwwww ..... Truly commendable work on all of those that helped putting this battle together ,, Unbelievable quality in preparation , setting up and running of the battle .... Cap deserves a goddam medal for the narration,,,, Was well worth the almost 54 minutes watching time ...... I'm gobbsmacked at looking at the Scoreboard at the end lol , I cant remember ever seeing that much info on a scoreboard of any of the GR videos I've seen ...... Thank you just isn't enough ........ My Respect and appreciation for all of the work done by the GR Team for providing these videos !!!!

  • @MrMartridad
    @MrMartridad 22 дні тому +1

    Grim calls them FLEET DEFENSE fighters. The internet "WhY pLaNe ShOoT aT aNtI sHiP mIsSiLe"