As if sub-shape binder and shapebinder were not confusing enough, you have to muddy the picture by renaming sub-shape binder as binder ... Why, please?
find confusing that you call sub-shape-binder "Binder", since both a binders. Also haven't seen this use anywhere else. Is there a way to synchronize SSB again or do i have to delete it? SSB seems more capable than SB. Other differences i found so far is that SSB works between different objects/bodies and even between different documents. SSB can also create faces from edges which SB cannot do.
I do not think you can sync SSB again. Once you detach it. It is done. That is my experience with SSB. Thank you for sharing your experience with others on SSB. Yes, I find SSB more capable than SB. But not sure why we have both SB and SSB in FreeCAD when one (combine) could be sufficient.
Awesome tutorials CADZIS! Great work!!!
Thank you... I will posting more videos.
As if sub-shape binder and shapebinder were not confusing enough, you have to muddy the picture by renaming sub-shape binder as binder ...
Why, please?
find confusing that you call sub-shape-binder "Binder", since both a binders. Also haven't seen this use anywhere else.
Is there a way to synchronize SSB again or do i have to delete it?
SSB seems more capable than SB.
Other differences i found so far is that SSB works between different objects/bodies and even between different documents.
SSB can also create faces from edges which SB cannot do.
I do not think you can sync SSB again. Once you detach it. It is done. That is my experience with SSB.
Thank you for sharing your experience with others on SSB. Yes, I find SSB more capable than SB. But not sure why we have both SB and SSB in FreeCAD when one (combine) could be sufficient.
@@cadzis673 totally agree. It could be simplified a lot. Because there also is "clone" , "Links" and "sub-Links" which are also kind of similar.
thx!!
yw