The biggest problem with Climate Change | Konstantin Kisin
Вставка
- Опубліковано 24 бер 2024
- John and Konstantin discuss the lies that are being told about how best to combat climate change and what the consequences of those lies are.
Raised in the Soviet Union, Konstantin is not persuaded by leftist visions of utopia, and exhorts reasonable people to speak out against the 'woke mob'. He also argues that multiculturalism should be rebranded as multi-ethnic societies with a 'monoculture', uniting everyone from different backgrounds.
Konstantin Kisin is a writer, social commentator, comedian, and co-host of the free speech podcast Triggernometry. He is a regular on British and American TV and radio shows including Question Time, Good Morning Britain, BBC Breakfast, Daily Politics, LBC Cross Question, Tucker Carlson, the Megyn Kelly Show, and many others.
Konstantin has written for publications including the Daily Telegraph, the Spectator, Tablet Magazine, Quillette, and Standpoint as well as his first book, An Immigrant’s Love Letter to the West. More recently, he spoke at the inaugural Alliance for Responsible Citizenship Conference in London, England.
Conversations feature John Anderson, former Deputy Prime Minister of Australia, interviewing the world's foremost thought leaders about today's pressing social, cultural and political issues.
John believes proper, robust dialogue is necessary if we are to maintain our social strength and cohesion. As he puts it; "You cannot get good public policy out of a bad public debate."
If you value this discussion and want to see more like it, make sure you subscribe to the channel here: / @johnandersonconversat...
And stay right up to date with all the conversations by subscribing to the newsletter here: johnanderson.net.au/contact/
Follow John on Twitter: / johnandersonac
Follow John on Facebook: / johnandersonac
Follow John on Instagram: / johnandersonac
Support the channel: johnanderson.net.au/support/
Website: johnanderson.net.au/
Podcast: johnanderson.net.au/podcasts/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ konstantinkisin
konstantinkisin.com/
Triggernometry: / @triggerpod
Leaders won't be dropping their living standards.
Irish politicians tried to give themselves a pay rise while we were locked down during COVID! They'll be chomping on steak long after we've been forced on to insects
Bingo. Funny that it's the rich that want to increase energy prices.
An neither will the greedy rich! The gap between rich and poor is already growing at an ever increasing, totally obscene rate, which will just increase further with these, unnecessary, 'climate change' costs. It's almost as if it's deliberate in some way!
That's been the case for 1,000's of years. But we were able to really see it during covid.
Australians should have and could have 80% home ownership for anybody that works a part-time job, but the politicians fail to stop landlords outbidding potential owner-occupiers at home-opens which takes stock away from owners and increases the rental ratio:existing stock. Therefore, Austrailana can have an increase in living standards and have their climate change ideals provided home ownership is more important than landlording!
Most of the young don’t know they have been brainwashed
We must not be silent
Cults tell you the world will end on such and such date and get you to give them all your stuff. Al Gore bought ocean front property with money from suckers who thought the world was going to end in 2016. It didn't end so any good cult will just come up with a new date. The new top scientist AKA AOC, said the world will end in 2031 so give her money.
The carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels are largely beneficial. Benefits include greening of the planet with increased agricultural yields (main effect), reduced winter heating costs, fewer deaths from hypothermia and postponement of the next glacial maximum.
There are 2 mass psychoses in operation in association with a massive fraud. Dishonest duplicitous politicians are colluding with it in order to garner the votes of the ignorant and ill informed and unscrupulous business people are colluding with it to garner taxpayer funded subsidies.
Most of the old, too
Did you listen to the first thirty seconds? Mislead not brainwashed
@@michaelthomas7898
Sorry yes I did miss the beginning the phone was connecting to the car
"It’s easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled." Mark Twain
END THE UN!
thats get a jab to a tee
I watch the school kids "quit school" for a day to protest climate change. They get driven to the meeting point, wave a few signs about for an hour, the signs then go in the nearest bin, they then go wait into an air-conditioned McDonalds, eyes glued to their phones awaiting pickup to go home, then they go on social media and post how they championed for climate change. Somebody want to explain it to them?
First, you explain what you've spent money on to mitigate your climate footprint. What have you done? You find it easy to point at the next guy, but you fail to show how you've tried to clean up what you do? Anything? Or just much easier to just point out the next guy and feel superior? I've got solar panels to provide energy for all my needs including my car, I quit eating meat and dairy (14% of global GHG emissions), I don't fly to go on holidays, and I've replaced old leaky windows and doubled my home insulation. I've done what I can so far. What have you done?
He's probably got a modern car (reduced emissions), has a modern efficient boiler, gets energy from a firm that invests in renewables, recycles and separates his rubbish.
CA oil production to zero by 2030. North Slope by 2040. North Sea is basically done. Venezuela is sour tar sands, like Alberta but light ends to dissolve it for shipment on the wrong side of Panama. North Slope excess goes to China. Alberta excess through Kitimat BC goes to ln'dia. Oil is now far too valuable to waste on useless eater Americans. Their Boomer inheritance will be stripped away by DEI/ESG Mil.Gov, then America will be left as grain, meat and fintech 'products' to the Eastern world. _Hey, learn to pick cotton. Old times there are not forgotten!_
Those who tell you to give up everything will give up nothing - never forget.
Leaders lead (by example).
What we have is a democratic dictatorship.
With com un ism, everyone is equal...
*AT THE BOTTOM.*
Who tells you this?
I've only heard the followers of JC spout this.
And their ilk.
@@user-ul9dv2iv9s You need to get out a lot more then if that's your baseline.
Never trust anyone who tells you to do something without voluntarily doing it first.
If someone saves in their retirement account and tells you to do the same, that’s trustworthy.
If a person buys an affordable, efficient car and tells you to do the same, that’s also trustworthy.
If Bernie tells you to pay more in taxes but doesn’t write a check to the IRS, he’s exploiting you.
If John Kerry flies in a private jet and tells you to reduce your emissions, he's also exploiting you.
The problem is the world economic forum that's influencing the politicians
* one of the problems
Comes down to money and control
@@mikes417 ...and power seeking.
and WHO Elected those ppl??
I think the word is "buying" not influencing
The biggest problem with the 'atmospheric CO2 warming the planet to dangerous levels' is that it's just not true. Nothing unusual is happening to the planet. Rural thermometer readings show little warming. The 1930s were much, much warmer than every decade since.
Never let the truth get in the way of a good story. It is nothing but a mechanism for the vast exchange of wealth from the many to the few.
Not only are the poor hit hard by high energy prices, it is also a very criminal idea to limit CO2, because all life depends on it.
It is known that in the past the amount of CO2 was about 7000 ppm and there has been a lot of growth in nature, nothing has broken or died, otherwise we would not be here now.
The current 420 ppm means nothing and does not cause an extreme greenhouse effect at all.
The first 20 ppm provide 80% of the NECESSARY greenhouse effect, otherwise it would be below freezing everywhere.
Above this, the effect decreases exponentially and at the current 420 ppm the effect is negligible.
CO2 is the only greenhouse gas that has this property, but it may not be published.
Climate change is caused by the sun and geothermal heat and there is absolutely nothing you can do about it. The most important greenhouse gas is water vapor.
The world is controlled by very big criminals who rob the world's population
and almost everyone participates, banks, pension funds, many companies and they can't go back because they have made themselves dependent by their own greed.
Any planetary warming that may or may not be happening is 100% due to our position in the galaxy and the sun’s effect on the earth’s magnetic field. These facts are too scary for the public, therefore, the governments make up a lie and mandate poverty and political interference on economic growth and development
When politicians tell you in one breath that renewables are cheaper than fossil fuels and that new transmission lines for renewable energy will cost $AU100B in the next, you KNOW they are lying.
The next logical conclusion is; if politicians are so determined to foist their ideology on us it will make energy unaffordable for households AND businesses, we need different politicians!
Those who tell us to install rooftop solar have figured out that the HVAC system of a well-built home should only operate a few minutes each hour, so that most of the solar power bleeds back into grid - that doesn't pay for it. Now, you need batteries to store that solar power, but few homeowners can afford that. So, now the state will subsidize billions for public battery utilities - which can catch fire, or freeze in the winter.
What happened to riding the bus? Why do city people need EVs? After Covid fewer want to ride mass transit.
And never mind the billions in subsidies to renewable!
and the most diabolical stat is that Australia produces less than 1% of global emissions, the costs do not add up to this labour governments position !
Human induced Climate Change is a human induced political propaganda tool invented by the political class for purposes of power and control of the masses. It is a created speculative possibility of futuristic predictions whose premises are as solid as the holes in swiss cheese. And it is this swiss cheese alarmism that is now messaging and driving suicidal social governmental policy in its attempt to herd a large portion of its citizen lemmings over the cliff.
They are deliberately destroying civilization, so they can go back to feudalism.
So nice to listen to people talking common sense 😊
Very rare these days most times when i hear two men it sounds like crying, whining having tantrums and blaming everyone else.
That's exactly what I thought when listening to them.
I know the biggest give away to the whingers and whiners is when they point their fingers at "the woke".
Sure fire sign they are on shaky ground.
Common sense = "I agree with the speaker"
Except they still foolishly believe that climate change is caused by man made co2. If you "Trust the Science" you are a gullible fool.
"Renewables are the cheapest source of electricity." They say.
Yet the more we switch to renewables, the higher the prices go...
I wonder why we don't believe them?
If they were serious about lowering emissions they'd be pushing for nuclear.
Thank goodness for this man talking common sense. WAKE UP WORLD.
What for. They are conservatives.
Nothing will change.
Wow, you just described what we are experiencing in the US!
Same in Europe
That's because it's happening across western civilization because of globalist elites.
Globally, fossil fuel subsidies were $7 trillion or 7.1 percent of GDP in 2022. Source: IMF
@@garysarela4431 UK renewables receive over 40% of the subsidies even though they produce only around 7% of the UK power.
And in Ireland
The promoters of this blatant manipulation by fear must be held to account. Or are the traumatized children just collateral damage? Along with all the other numerous harms.
ExxonMobil's own scientists predicted rising global temperature along with CO2 levels, back in 1982. Their forecasts remain essentially perfect.
@@garysarela4431 They do not all the models are way off. When they are checked against historical proxy data all models show warming mid Holocene even though the planet was cooling.
@@garysarela4431 That's impressive. Did he forecast spending trillions to cut CO2 and it having negligible impact? On CO2 that is. We've increased the number of people in Africa below the poverty line from 100 million to 350 million.
@@ricshumack9134 Expect 15%-25% reduction in global per capita output by 2100 with 2.5-3.0°C of global warming. Source: M.Burke et al. (2018)
@@garysarela4431
How are you going to stop India and China from increasing emissions and building more coal fired power plants? Without them coming on board what we are doing is worth squat.
Climate is the best cash cow ever.
Next to vaccines.
Nah. The cash cow is the fossil fuel industry.
That and the covid jabs
@@TheMassacreOfTheBanuQurayzahQuwith fossil fuels you get a commodity in return. With climate change bs all you get is poorer
@@cbmech2563 Wrong. You get poorer by not slowing down climate change. The cost is in the trillions.
And while all this economic and environmental damage is being done, oil companies get richer.
Most politicians don't believe what they are saying, they are saying what they think will get them elected. The ones we should be most worried about are the ones who most want the government to have more power over your lives. Because the more power we give a politician, the more they can abuse it to enrich themselves, give themselves and their friends special treatment, and lengthen their tenure in those positions of power.
Politicians say what donators want them to say.
Tony Heller has made a tireless effort to present the actual climate data. The relatively few decades of imperical weather data do not show a heating trend.
The huge mega cities are relatively warm compared to rural areas not far away. Who would have thought that concrete and asphalt is warmer than trees and grass?
Tony is a legend for what he has been doing. I hope he would get some visibility in some of the bigger podcasts maybe in the near future.
He basically destroys the green ideology simply by looking at the history and science. Sometimes the points he makes are so obvious but so against the main stream narrative that it is almost painful to watch 😄
Tony Heller is a misinformer and deceiver about climate issues, and you appear to be one of his many victims.
Claiming that there is not a recent heating trend is absurd denialism. That global heating trend is shown not only on land but also in sea surface temperatures (that Heller NEVER mentions).
Heller only ever mentions data from the contiguous USA (or a few other cherry picked areas) where adjustments to raw temperature data does indeed increase the rate of warming - and then accuses scientists of "fraud" and "tampering" with the data. But Heller never mentions the much larger areas, (including all ocean data) where adjustments REDUCE the rate of warming. The OVERALL effect of adjustments is to reduce the rate of warming, but Heller never mentions that because that would cause his claims of fraud to fall flat on their face.
Heller is a disgrace, followed only by gullible individuals who haven't looked at all the data.
Tom Nelson has a good podcast. He invites some excellent scientists to present their arguments against the alleged climate catastrophe.
@@darylfoster7944Perhaps you would care to outline one of those "arguments against the alleged climate catastrophe" and say who the "excellent scientist" is who proposes it.
Who would have thought? Anyone that understands that the color green reflects near infrared radiation instead of absorbing it leading to a patch of grass being cooler than say an asphalt parking lot.
Great man. Wish he was still in Parliament 🥴
No problems, the poison is still being spread
What _ the Russian one?
4:30 "No one wants to go into politics who is honest." Indeed. That's the problem with the modern world government. The only reason people go into politics is to amass their personal fortunes. Their objective is not to help people; it's to get rich.
The elites won’t drop their living standards
😂look at John Kerry and his airplane
@@consco3667 He claim it is not his, it is from his wife. She owns it, he just use it :)
@@petardetar5191 yeah Peter you and I can use my wife’s plane whenever we want😂😂😂😂. They are so full of themselves it’s ridiculous
@@petardetar5191 I am also pretty positive that’s why the Obama’s bought a place on the ocean is because they are terrified of global warming…..er…climate change….
Net Zero, Making POVERTY great again!!!
Australians should have and could have 80% home ownership for anybody that works a part-time job, but the politicians fail to stop landlords outbidding potential owner-occupiers at home-opens which takes stock away from owners and increases the rental ratio:existing stock. Therefore, Austrailana can have an increase in living standards and have their climate change ideals provided home ownership is more important than landlording!
@@oscarsheen3045 I don't even understand what you're contending. Why not just go full communist, if you don't believe homes should be sold for what they fetch on the open market?
If even we allow the patently insane idea that potential landowners are ruining the market by buying houses as true, you haven't done any of the math necessary to illustrate that the "savings" people will achieve through price control on houses will pay for the increased prices of energy.
NEO-FEUDALISM.
Net zero. Except for the rich and influential.
@@GCRAAY Or "net Zero "is more about your & my back accounts
An intelligent conversation. Sanity, common sense, and honesty are alive! Thank you.
Excellent two men.
"There are no solutions, there are only tradeoffs." Thomas Sowell
This dude must have been a shrewd "negotiator" involved in politics.
To those who need chaos to hide their intentions and crimes - solutions are deadly traps.
Nobody speaks about the extreme costs for changing from fossil fuel to electricity.
Do you mean the cost of changing from burning oil in homes to grid connected power?
@@chrispekel5709 no I think he talks about, having gas lines into every home to cook food.
Brilliant and true!
Lies is all they got
Yup. Some smart alec came up with a scam to tax the whole world and we are not having any of it
John Anderson was a politician who went on to become chairman of Eastern Star Gas. What he has to say about climate change is not credible.
I will not live by them…lies
Lies is all you want.
Senator John Kennedy got $343,492 from the from Oil & Gas industry, 2021-2022. Source: Open Secrets
For a looming crisis, the actual consequences are weirdly absent. How are we supposed to weigh the sacrifice we have to make now against an unknown, unquantified potential future sacrifice?
Yep, that ( unknown, unquantified potential future sacrifice) is the "Boogeyman" of whom we should all be trembling in fear and heaps praise and thanks upon of saviors from him. It is not a new narrative. Just a new variants of an old one.
Planet Earth is suspended in Space which has a temperature of minus 273 degrees Centigrade. The biosphere's biggest problem is to stay warm and not freeze .
I absolutely love your reasonable conversations , with equally thoughtful guests on topics everyone should be concerned with. Thank you for your voice of reason.
Except for the fact that they aren't calling the bs what it is: A great hoax.
Slightly wrong focus on the reduction of CO2 instead of the fact that there is not scientific evidence that it is somehow bad.
Agreed. But that is a very touchy and difficult subject because we ( I) see many dozens of "news" or scientific articles every day, that tell stories about the destruction of climate change. And the reason always being co2. To say anything else is very controversial and pretty much automatically earns you a science denier flat earther badge 😢
@@ulrichenevoldsen8371Yes, the people believing in the official narrative are in a rather pitiable state, i.e. 'eat whole grains and take your statins'.
@@ulrichenevoldsen8371 Yes, funding does wonders for getting the science results you pay for.
Was the greenhouse effect of CO2 completely made up? Are you saying it does nothing to trap heat in the atmosphere?
@@brushstroke3733 do you know how many parts per million co2 is in our atmosphere? Have you ever looked at paleontological evidence of historical climate change while you are there look upward at earths relationship with our sun and its place in the spiral arm of our galaxy and how that affects climate. Your answers are there.
Even Michael Moore figured out that "green" energy is a scam.
😅true
Please keep talking the truth, well done, thank you.
two of my favorite people
Workers understand. Officials and academics do not.
Because officials and academics deal in intangibles - workers are the ones who pay them
Excellent interview 👏
Wood heating is the only renewable that I know of
Tell this to the Greens.
ALp, Teals and Greens all bought up and paid for by the WEF.
The who?
Green freaks
@@simongross3122 The Green Party in the US. Most western country has some sort of like lunatics occasionally running for office.
You can't tell them anything because they'll just say it's racism! Funny how the "Green" parties also seem to have taken on board CRT and Gender theory wholesale, in addition to climate panic fanaticism....
When saying the obvious is fringe, expect people to rebel against the narrative.
Where is there any rebellion against the climate nonsense? … we ain’t seen it in Australia
That will also happen in the longer term; there is no other way.
You have to include backup power as part of the cost of renewables. Nuclear is the way but unbelievably in Australia they banned it despite having good uranium deposits.
Of course - turn on Nuclear and the politicians and other lunatics are short of $ billions they force everybody to contribute in one way or the other.
Take climate out of the political arena and the politicians will have a "money" crisis.
Talking about Australian leadership ( or lack there of), how do we get rid of the Teal “not so independent” independents funded by climate 200?
To a colour blind person, doesn't red and green appear the same? Same in politics! Teal is close enough to green.
To get hot water when the electricity is out, Hubby and I had a solar hot water tank installed on our roof. Here in the tropics electric outage can be a daily occurrence which results in an unreliable supply of hot water. We've had the solar tank about 20 years now, and the only time it does not provide sufficient hot water is when there is no sun for 5+ days, a rarity.
8 Years ago an overflow part failed which caused flooding. Companies will install the solar tanks, however NO ONE here repairs them or has access to original parts.
It took Hubby over 3 months of buying parts locally, sawing and soldering trying to creat what was needed. Then he started ordering parts online, and sawed and soldered some more to create what was needed. Finally, he was able to create a part that functioned perfectly, better than the original part.
During that time we used our electrical tankless water heater which is not a great hot water provider.
-----
As a home owner I'm not convinced that solar electricity is any financial saving.
I'm not convinced that, at this point in time, we have the necessary technology that would enable us to reach our energy goals..
Additionally, there's the consideration that people, communities, and land are destroyed during the mining for necessary materials.
Solar/wind might be the latest in scams.
Time will tell.
I believe it is a scam, too.
+1 on the scam angle. It has all the earmarks of a scam. The tally doesn't add up for cost, load needed, distribution or storage. Yet there are "some" people that are getting rich off of it and governments are pushing it based on lobbyist spending. By the time we all see the emperor has no clothes, we won't be able to afford any clothes ourselves.
Definitely a scam.
Maybe someday, but not today do we have the capability to power society with breezes and sunshine.
in the tropics maybe. But you don't need much energy when it's warm and you can be outside all the time, you have everything growing and thriving naturally the whole year. Can't compare with colder climate where we actually need more energy and can't rely on sunny days.
KK hits the nail on the head regarding trust in politicians and other institutions which used to be more generally respected.
Exactly when were they more generally respected? Not in my 48 years.
I didn’t know about Australia’s farming research! That’s a wonderful contribution.
The climate industrial complex is no different than the military industrial complex. There are groups and researchers that have significant vested interest in maintaining or expanding their funding to push a narrative that is based on weak models.
Absolutely correct!
They have money for war but cannot help poor people.
Or the fossil fuels complex
The problem with renewables is that they cannot replace the current energy use. They do 2-8% of the use. Maybe we can push it to 25% …
And the poor countries are doomed to abject poverty when we keep pushing this. And we havent seen real immigration yet.
2-8%, and they can only do that unreliably, so require fossil fuel backup.
Twenty-seven scientists outline roadmaps for 139 countries to use 100% wind-water-solar in all energy sectors and this includes storage. Source: M. Jacobson et al. (2017) "100% Clean and Renewable Wind, Water, and Sunlight All-Sector Energy Roadmaps for 139 Countries of the World"
Fairy tales. @@garysarela4431
Unless the populations come together and rise up and so NO, the elites will push this on us!
@@garysarela4431
I have a roadmap for me to build a rocket and fly to the moon.
FYI some are not lasting 20 years. Wind farms were given the same life span when i was installing them. There are some in the UK that have now spinning and not working but cost too much to pull down.
Thank you for telling the truth!
I've listened to your speech again at the Oxford Union. It just says it all.
The answer is simple. Nuclear energy.
Angela Merkel gave Germany the final "shot in the neck" before she retired.
Nuclear energy - after she shut down all coal mining in Germany - she declared it illegal as of 2022. The year Putin attacked Ukraine - Merkel paid for a pipeline from Russia to Germany directly - in case something should happen in Ukraine - the present pipeline from Russia - to Germany/
But it doesn't benefit the elite 😕
But it doesn't benefit the elite
Everyone must watch the documentary Climate the movie, it explains the climate con perfectly 👍
Except for one thing. The movie makes it seem like the only thing wrong with temperature data is the urban heat island effect when actually groups like NASA and NOAA are intentionally doctoring the data by lowering temperatures of the past and raising recent temperatures. Tony Heller has several videos on this.
Climate the movie: The cold truth. It's on Tony Heller's channel, and it features Tony. It should be shown to every school child in order to balance the relentless propaganda young kids are fed during their formative years.
Lies, deceit and corruption...it pretty much sums up the public servants throughout the world.
Thank you John Anderson for making an and very meaningful contribution and sharing this with us.
Climate change is to do with taxation
Communism
It's a guilt free way to tax more
100%
Manipulation.
@user-yn9qh1kz1q that does t fit in with there ridiculous pensions though, that's why they encourage immigration without education because they will still pop out kids like jelly tots
“This is nonsense! “ - KK
Australia..detach yourselves from Bill Gates
BILLY'S EVERYWHERE!!!
Bill Gates is based. I love the man. May he grace every country!
Thanks for this, great informational video.
Profit over people.
No - no profits. It is high way robbery. Tax Payer's savings pulled out via $ billions to the UN for the climate.
Say thank you to people like John Kerry and his boss Obama
Uk, vote reform.
Yeah brexit worked wonders
Brilliant
Andrew Bridgen breaks the mould of politicians. A courageous man, look how badly he has been treated by the Conservative party.
I get my climate change updates from Climate Discussion Nexus, Tony Heller, Patrick Moore, Dr Willie Soon, John Christy, Lord Monckton, Freeman Dyson.
Good for them. The climate is their source of income.
So what we are talking about is controlling luxury items which are purchased by the 1% ? Aircraft use a lot of fuel - who uses airplanes un-necessarily ?
Marles just flew the British defence minister from Canberra to Adelaide in 2 RAAF fighter jets.
This. A thousand times this. There is no way to get to net zero without large reductions in the standard of living in every industrialized country.
Informed and correct
We as humans vastly overrate our importance and significance of our impact on this planet.
If we keep going down this track we will see a global depression that will make the 1930's look like a picnic. With no industry, very little primary production or mining just where do people think they will find the money for this renewables utopia?
Look at the green energy policies of the DAP.
@@sdrc92126That's why I support One Nation, they refuse to acknowledge the alarmist agenda while the DAP still believes in Anthropomorphic Climate Change.
@@JohnWilliams-iw6oq I mean as in the NS kind. That's where all of this green stuff comes from.
@@sdrc92126thanks for the clarification.
The real killer to society is going to be food costs and shortages. All of the Western advances in farming are very dependent on energy. In the US, 30.2% of the population worked on farms directly; today, that number is 1.2%. That was almost exclusively due to improved farming tech that is energy driven: fuel, fertilizer and pesticides. That also means that only a small fraction of the population has any idea how to grow crops consistently.
Good interviewer and interviewee
The real problem is that most people prefer to BELIEVE than to UNDERSTAND. THINKING is hard man!!!
I like this man. He makes total sense to me
He is guilty of "hate speech". Since the woke liberal wackos hate what he says.
Have any of the viewers on here watched the latest film -climate the movie?
To begin greed has to go! Following that the society that operates on greed.
In the age of desinformation, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.🎉
Lets be clear: atmospheric CO2 is 0.041% of total atmosphere, or about 410ppm. The non-man made portion of that is 0.03968% or 396.8 ppm. The anthropogenic portion is 13.2 ppm or 0.00132%. The Australian contribution to anthropogenic CO2 is 1.3%, which means the total Australian contribution to global CO2 is 0.0000172% of earths atmosphere. Why should my children lose their standard of living over that minuscule amount? Not enough perspective? The atmosphere of Venus is about 96% CO2, but the total increase in temperature from this is only around 2 degrees C.
Your figures on CO2 are completely wrong.
In 1750AD, at the start of the Industrial Revolution, atmospheric CO2 stood at around 277ppmv (evidence from multiple ice cores), and had remained close to that level for over 10,000 years. CO2 is presently 421ppmv, an increase of 144ppmv. An increase of 1ppmv requires 7.83 billion tonnes of CO2, so that 144ppmv required an addition of 1,128 b. t. of CO2. Records of fossil fuel burning show that humans emitted 1,848 b.t. CO2 between 1750 and 2021 - more than enough to account for ALL of the increase, with the natural environment absorbing the remainder (ie being a net absorber of CO2) during that time. Thus, the proportion of man-made CO2 in the atmosphere is currently 144/421x100 = 34%.
In other words, human activity is entirely responsible for the increase of 144ppmv CO2 from around 277ppmv CO2 in 1750 to 421ppmv now, during which time the natural environment (the oceans and the terrestrial biosphere) have acted as net ABSORBERS of CO2.
NASA estimates that the oceans are currently absorbing around 7 billion tonnes of human generated CO2 per year, and the terrestrial biosphere around 11 b.t. CO2 ie natural systems are now, and have been since 1750AD NET absorbers of CO2.
Your figures of 0.03968% or 396.8 ppm being non-man-made with the anthropogenic portion being 13.2 ppm or 0.00132% have no validity whatsoever.
@@Tengooda Perhaps you should go to an academic library and read the science, instead of looking on the internet for the propaganda to support your ideological biases.
@@Tengoodayep and the little ice age killed 10% of the worlds population. It would have been much higher if not for coal.
If co2 had fallen to 250ppm then we all would have died as that would have been the end of trees grass and algae’s. Do some research into tree stomas and co2 levels then you’ll understand why the earth is now getting greener.
@@daemon1143 All of the figures I quoted above are from reputable sources (Mauna Loa for recent atmospheric CO2, the Carbon Dioxide Information and Analysis Centre for past emissions, Vostok and other ice cores for past CO2, NASA for the carbon cycle) and all are consistent with peer reviewed science published in scientific journals, which is where , along with an excellent science based education and career, my understanding and knowledge has been obtained. Unfortunately, UA-cam no longer allow links to such sources of information, so I am unable to show them.
You, on the other hand produce a figure of 13.2ppmv for the anthropogenic contribution to atmospheric CO2, which has no basis in reality, and you will not be able to substantiate it: you are just a typical climate science denier posting nonsense.
@Tengooda So at what point regarding CO2 is acceptable. Does CO2 lag or lead temperature increase. Everything you climate evangelists spout completely ignores the effects of the sun.
Watch Climate The Movie, Food Lies. Quickly though before it disappears!
My motto: innovation not regulation
Always liked John …
He’s not scared of the truth…
How long does it take one wind turbine to replace the energy it took to make it in the first place?
There is no climate crisis
“At what cost?” - the question politicians will never ever answer
I would love to sit down with you and have a chat about things like this!
Myself and my three brothers are wool growers near Orange NSW!
It is quite simple to figure out your being lied to. Just do a few simple pieces of mathematics and look at how big the numbers are. Then you know this imposed change won’t happen.
Example. Swap to electric vehicles would require swapping 1.450.000.000 cars.
Let’s for argument sake say an average car needs a 300 kg battery pack.
The electric transition will require 435.000.000 tones of various materials delivered by planet Earth.
Not including materials required to change infrastructure.
That is when you find out you are being lied to.
For me, promoting renewable energy is similar to promoting Primark clothing. It's amazingly cheap and there is loads of it... If you don't pay attention to the manufacturing process and the long term damage.
I learned a long time ago that when politicians say you need to do this we should be doing the opposite
Absolutely agree with this piece. Read Bjorn Lombourg’s books!
🙂
04:20 - Konstantin thinks "the media portray politicians as liars, so we get liars."
Really? That's his analysis? He thinks the media CAUSE politicians to be liars?
That is the most ridiculous idea I've heard this week, and there's a lot of competition. That man has no grip on reality.
I think his argument was more that they perpetuate it rather than initially caused it.
@@craigstege6376
Do you think that's true?
Think about using dynamic Cost-Benefit analysis. Start with scenario A to evaluate the alternatives then model changing factors. Our long term success depends on responsive solutions.
Fifty million years ago the co2 levels were at 7000 ppm, today the co2 levels are at 420 ppm, when they end up at 150 ppm co2 all life on earth is gone.
And how was human civilization doing fifty million years ago?
@@becausecontextmatters5260 It was then that there was most life on Earth and our first ancestors began to appear.
During my 44 year career in meteorology/climatology, CO2 was never used for anything, and it was never mentioned by anybody either. FORGET THE CO2 talk; it's MEANINGLESS.
@@tombradshaw5164 When you can trick people into thinking that the air they breathe is a threat to the planet, then you can trick them into anything.
@@klimatbluffen First of all that's not what i asked and secondly by ancestors you mean what? squirrels?
The idea that human activity is changing the weather , when NO weather change is discernible , is gaslighting at it's finest .
As the temperature rises, so does the population.
Not a question of lies, it’s because people need hope for the future otherwise there is a danger of passivity and helplessness taking hold.
But sorry you are not telling people the truth either that carbon dioxide is the lifeblood of the planet not the death of the planet, carbon dioxide is 0.04 of the planets total and if it drops to 0.o2 plants will start to die , so it's not carbon dioxide that's causing climate change and these experts know this but are lieing to everybody , the reason for climate change is to do with subtle changes in the actions of the sun which is the biggest feature that results in all changes in the solar system so you should be pushing this as far and wide as you can so the planets citizens get the truth thankyou
My Colliers encyclopaedia of 1974 gives the proportion of CO2 as 0.038. that's 50 years to increase by 0.003 %
..yes and yes and yes…and that’s why we’re effed…#consumerism #overpopulation #emissions
They tell us renewable energy is cheaper to produce than fossil fuel, they tell us that renewables account for 50% of our energy needs here in the UK, yet the cost of energy has doubled? Who’s scamming who?
Mr. Anderson must be the next Prime Minister of Australia!
The most efficient and pragmatic solution to any threat facing humanity is always economic growth. Wealth mitigates and neutralizes threats from every aspect of climate.
I watched that new documentary called "Climate The Movie" yesterday. Loved it.
The most ridiculous aspect of the 'climate crisis' is that there is no crisis at all. Simply because there is no such thing as an "atmospheric greenhouse effect", because an atmosphere (any atmosphere) is the exact opposite of a greenhouse. A greenhouse is a thermodynamical system capable of storing thermal energy, because it allows optical radiation to come in but blocks the reprocessed infrared radiation from getting out (a property of solids such as glass and plastic). An atmosphere is a thermodynamical system designed to transport thermal energy outwards, from the hotter lower layers to the cooler outer space, very efficiently via (blackbody) radiation. A greenhouse is a water bottle; an atmosphere is a waterfall. You cannot store water in a waterfall; it is permanently flowing from the upper to the lower side. If one tries to store thermal energy in an atmosphere, it reacts immediately and violently, spreading the extra energy outwards and upwards with the speed of light (by radiation) and the sound speed (by a shock wave). This is what happens in a nuclear bomb explosion.
Because there is no 'atmospheric greenhouse effect', there are no greenhouse gases. The surface temperature of the Earth is basically determined by the amount of solar energy that reaches the surface, not by the chemical composition of the Earth's atmosphere. And that amount of energy changes cyclically on several timescale (100s of millions of years, 10s to 100s of thousands of years, several centuries) for several reasons, none of them related to the chemical content of the atmosphere.
CO2 is not a pollutant, but the gas of life. A larger amount of CO2 in the atmosphere means a greener planet (more photosynthesis, more vegetation), which implies that a larger fraction of that solar energy reaching the surface is not reemited as infrared radiation (determining the surface temperature) but is being consumed in the photosynthesis process. In other words, larger amount of CO2 in the atmosphere means a slightly cooler, more lively planet (life demands energy). The 'anthropogenic global warming' = 'climate crisis' narrative is the biggest scam of all times, the most pathetic idea ever put forward in the history of science.
Simple Maximum 10 year political terms
No Career Politician
This would immediately fix the unrepresentative Swill in our upper House.
I am so tired of these discussion on 'climate change' BS. When will bureaucrats become truthful and get real about this crazy topic.