i agree with the ending point by the narrator that this system too often leaks into personal family and relationships. If you actually identify 'with' a party of course you are going to feel offended when someone attacks 'your' party.
You mean the public policy outline created by a privately funded conservative think tank? What exactly is that supposed to prove, and why are we all of the sudden treating this organization as a secret, gov't embedded authoritarian regime, even though HF has been pushing the same ultra-conservative policy for decades? (They used to be even more right-wing, btw) Or... are you saying this simply because you've bought into the echo chamber's latest scapegoat as a rationalization for beating the Orange man at all costs?
i agree with the ending point by the narrator that this system too often leaks into personal family and relationships. If you actually identify 'with' a party of course you are going to feel offended when someone attacks 'your' party.
Read the Harritage Foundations "Mandate for Leadership 2025"
You mean the public policy outline created by a privately funded conservative think tank? What exactly is that supposed to prove, and why are we all of the sudden treating this organization as a secret, gov't embedded authoritarian regime, even though HF has been pushing the same ultra-conservative policy for decades? (They used to be even more right-wing, btw)
Or... are you saying this simply because you've bought into the echo chamber's latest scapegoat as a rationalization for beating the Orange man at all costs?
They are two cheeks of the same backside.
and what is that backside?
@@thriftshop17 The establishment
@@craigsavel3756 good answer. moral of the story is, develop agency outside of the establishment