Everytime i see a video on nietzsche from someone else i always think "essentialsalts would not have approached this so simply" and end up coming back to your channel
My first Nietzsche book was Twilight of the Idols and I found it quite funny that the first thing he said about Socrates was that he was ugly. Thanks for the video, I'm learning a lot.
He didn't mean it like that, but what ugly does to the psyche the Why of his way of being. Ugly in all aspects not just physical. Now, whether his conclusions from that are true or not is the debate. But if I remember correctly I think some person traveling by saw him and told socrates he had all the vices inside him, and thus...
Thank you man. Love philosophy but work an unrelated job and would never have time to (or probably even think) to explore topics like this. Appreciate you uploading
I like what Nietzsche wrote in the Twilight of idols, The problem of Sokrates, 3 (translated from German): "A foreigner who knew a lot about faces said to Socrates' face when he passed through Athens that he was a monstrum - he harbored all the worst vices and desires. And Socrates simply replied: "You know me, my lord!""
Your channel has quickly become one of my favorites in this area. I really appreciate the fact that you do not compromise in depth or sophistication with a view toward, should we say, "algo friendliness." Without asking you to deviate far from your passions in this field, I think you have not only the capacity intellectually but also creatively and productively to expand this channel into a much broader engagement with philosophy from ancient to contemporary. For example, I'd love it if you produced a series on the development and evolution of german idealism and how its vectors influenced geopolitical developments through the centuries. Obviously, these are massive topics. We are far from discussing a "4-part series". Instead, I'm suggesting possible avenues for you to broaden the channel moving forward. I guess what I'm after here is something like: you'd not get any complaints if your UA-cam channel became an extended history of western philosophy. Your analyses are robust and substantive without being over-inflated or pretentious, sufficient to inspire without becoming stuffy. Tremendous work. Thank you.
8:00 I have heard Michael Sugrue point out that Asclepios could be curing Socrates of the pain or fear of death rather than of life. Something to consider.
I’m reading plato and Kant, then Schopenhauer then nietzche. Anything else anyone recommends anything to read in between for best understanding of nietzche?
The first Socratic dialogue I've read on my own was the Gorgas and I grew frustrated about halfway at Socrates's stubbornness before I gave up reading the rest of it, but I reluctantly finished reading it. I still hold Socrates in higher esteem than Jesus throughout my entire life.
@essentialsalts it would be awesome if you made a video responding to Lou Salome’s biography of Nietzsche. I love your videos, keep up the good work ❤❤❤
I wonder if Socrates said what he did before he died as a final "fuck you" rather than to say that life is a disease and it's cure is death. Like, there are things you say that make people think you're sick in the head, and then there are things you say that make people exclaim, "You're sick!" I feel like he said it ironically and didn't really believe that death was the cure for life.
12:00 Personally I don't get Nietzsche's ADMIRATION for Socrates, precisely bc of his own critique of him, Socrates seems to be enjoying himself confusing YOUNG minds and some political minds along the way. The way S. boxed people in with his first few questions, then used those answers to make them contradict themselves and "see" their hypocrisy. Some funny savvy christians used that method to do the same, the old "have you EVER stolen anything?" of curse yes, as a child I took some bread I wasn't supposed to, and they feel so smart as they say "ok, so by your OWN ADMISSION you are a thief, and THUS a sinner" And they continue to ask questions in that line until you BY YOUR OWN ADMISSION (according to them), are the worst person in the world. But hey, guess what, they got the cure for that, Jesus pre paid your sins etc etc... its a parlor trick though and it only works bc most people do not know how to answer. Socrates seems to me to be a MORE clever sort than these street walking christians... imagine the impact of this sort fo talk on unread inexperienced YUNG men and women?? Heck, many men use this same tactic to seduce women, as Socrates did. So did N. admire him or did he admire his bravery doing this in those times of great danger for people questioning the status quo?? Also he cannot really admire that mentality, since at some point N. said the any way of thinking or philosophy that lets you WILLINGLY get killed (Jesus, socrates) is hateful and erroneous. For the first thing(s) a person has to decide as soon as he or she has used of reason, is to say a big yes or no to LIFE, with all its contradictions and lack of meaning, and passing made up objectives (nihilism), a rejection of that to seek that "will to power" as he defined it, a bit differently than Schopenhauer.
Socrates can be said to have been an " anti-Sophist" considering the fact that at his time professional Sophists were highly respected for their " American Lawyers' style of spin-doctoring" almost any statements whereas Socrates began to develop a rational dialectic mindset( rather than a dialectic system ) , and yet he also agreed with the sophists that one can only approach the truth by dialectic without being led to firm convictions , in that sense Nietzsche distinguishes himself from Socrates for Nietzsche seems to have been affected by his firm emotional convictions.
Indeed! I did a video about the Apology that notes the similarities between Socrates and the Sophists, how he inverts their style of rhetoric into something designed *not* to persuade. Ironically, however, many Athenians would have seen Socrates as indistinguishable from a Sophist! Here is the video: ua-cam.com/video/gvXFWV0jT2o/v-deo.htmlsi=IV6Jrs-b-0F4nMJr
Nietzsche annoys me with his convoluted unclear writing. J.K. Chesterton said he wrote in metaphors because he didn't have the courage (or perhaps clarity) to say what is true. So, I only got 10 min into yr video. My impatient reading was that Nietzsche disliked Socrates for being the forefather of moral philosophy which preceded Christianity. Nietzsche hated Christianity which he considered weak and repressive. The Greek Moral Philosophy shared the Judaeo-Christian demand to discipline the passions by an ascetic life. The moral teachings of the Greeks were therefore compatible with Christianity. Nietzsche hated Christianity - yet he mimicked the gospels with his lonely solipsistic 'Thus Spake Zarathustra' - so he hated (to be simple) the Greek moral philosophers.
If you can’t read Nietzsche without enjoying the writing, stick to GK Chesterton. He’s a fine writer in his own right. Your repeated use of the word “hate”, etc confirms for me that you indeed only watched 10 minutes of the video. Things aren’t so black and white.
People might have enjoyed Greek moral philosophy without Christianity's metaphysical baggage. Perhaps that oaf Chesterton couldn't comprehend such a perspective because he would be a fish out of water without his Christian metaphysics.
Nice job, I discovered your channel recently and have not stopped listening to past videos. So much great work! Thank you
Everytime i see a video on nietzsche from someone else i always think "essentialsalts would not have approached this so simply" and end up coming back to your channel
My first Nietzsche book was Twilight of the Idols and I found it quite funny that the first thing he said about Socrates was that he was ugly.
Thanks for the video, I'm learning a lot.
He didn't mean it like that, but what ugly does to the psyche the Why of his way of being. Ugly in all aspects not just physical. Now, whether his conclusions from that are true or not is the debate.
But if I remember correctly I think some person traveling by saw him and told socrates he had all the vices inside him, and thus...
Thank you man. Love philosophy but work an unrelated job and would never have time to (or probably even think) to explore topics like this. Appreciate you uploading
I like what Nietzsche wrote in the Twilight of idols, The problem of Sokrates, 3 (translated from German):
"A foreigner who knew a lot about faces said to Socrates' face when he passed through Athens that he was a monstrum - he harbored all the worst vices and desires. And Socrates simply replied: "You know me, my lord!""
That was amazing. As a fan of both Socrates and Nietzsche I found explanation both fascinating and illuminating. Thank you.
This channel is so severely underrated man
I appreciate your hard work, it mean alot to me my friend.
Thanks for the content 😊❤
This was beautifully quoted, and the art focused was visually stunning.
With gratitude for all you do, essentialists.
👏👏👏👏
🙏❤️🌎🌿🕊🎵🎶🎵
Thank you! 🙏
Your channel has quickly become one of my favorites in this area. I really appreciate the fact that you do not compromise in depth or sophistication with a view toward, should we say, "algo friendliness."
Without asking you to deviate far from your passions in this field, I think you have not only the capacity intellectually but also creatively and productively to expand this channel into a much broader engagement with philosophy from ancient to contemporary. For example, I'd love it if you produced a series on the development and evolution of german idealism and how its vectors influenced geopolitical developments through the centuries.
Obviously, these are massive topics. We are far from discussing a "4-part series". Instead, I'm suggesting possible avenues for you to broaden the channel moving forward. I guess what I'm after here is something like: you'd not get any complaints if your UA-cam channel became an extended history of western philosophy.
Your analyses are robust and substantive without being over-inflated or pretentious, sufficient to inspire without becoming stuffy.
Tremendous work. Thank you.
Thank you!
I really appreciate your way of keeping close to the text while at the same time having a broad outlook.
But, mother! I want to save hellenic society!
We have a society at home!
The society:
8:00 I have heard Michael Sugrue point out that Asclepios could be curing Socrates of the pain or fear of death rather than of life. Something to consider.
I’m reading plato and Kant, then Schopenhauer then nietzche. Anything else anyone recommends anything to read in between for best understanding of nietzche?
Check out: La Rochefoucauld’s Moral Maxims, Rousseau’s Discourse on Inequality, Emerson’s Essay on Self-Reliance, Heraclitus’ Fragments.
The Greek Tragedians if you haven't already!
The first Socratic dialogue I've read on my own was the Gorgas and I grew frustrated about halfway at Socrates's stubbornness before I gave up reading the rest of it, but I reluctantly finished reading it. I still hold Socrates in higher esteem than Jesus throughout my entire life.
@essentialsalts it would be awesome if you made a video responding to Lou Salome’s biography of Nietzsche. I love your videos, keep up the good work ❤❤❤
Nice work!
great channel!
Socrates was hated by Athenians because one of his students overthrew the government
William Durant said Nietzsche was most harsh upon those he owed the greatest debt(s).
Greatly appreciate your elaborations! What is the name of the outro music?
It’s a free apple loop 😂
I wonder if Socrates said what he did before he died as a final "fuck you" rather than to say that life is a disease and it's cure is death. Like, there are things you say that make people think you're sick in the head, and then there are things you say that make people exclaim, "You're sick!"
I feel like he said it ironically and didn't really believe that death was the cure for life.
12:00
Personally I don't get Nietzsche's ADMIRATION for Socrates, precisely bc of his own critique of him, Socrates seems to be enjoying himself confusing YOUNG minds and some political minds along the way. The way S. boxed people in with his first few questions, then used those answers to make them contradict themselves and "see" their hypocrisy. Some funny savvy christians used that method to do the same, the old "have you EVER stolen anything?" of curse yes, as a child I took some bread I wasn't supposed to, and they feel so smart as they say "ok, so by your OWN ADMISSION you are a thief, and THUS a sinner" And they continue to ask questions in that line until you BY YOUR OWN ADMISSION (according to them), are the worst person in the world. But hey, guess what, they got the cure for that, Jesus pre paid your sins etc etc... its a parlor trick though and it only works bc most people do not know how to answer.
Socrates seems to me to be a MORE clever sort than these street walking christians... imagine the impact of this sort fo talk on unread inexperienced YUNG men and women?? Heck, many men use this same tactic to seduce women, as Socrates did.
So did N. admire him or did he admire his bravery doing this in those times of great danger for people questioning the status quo??
Also he cannot really admire that mentality, since at some point N. said the any way of thinking or philosophy that lets you WILLINGLY get killed (Jesus, socrates) is hateful and erroneous. For the first thing(s) a person has to decide as soon as he or she has used of reason, is to say a big yes or no to LIFE, with all its contradictions and lack of meaning, and passing made up objectives (nihilism), a rejection of that to seek that "will to power" as he defined it, a bit differently than Schopenhauer.
Just discovered your channel and have been binging. I'm curious if u have a formal education or are u just philosophical inclined?
Self-taught. Like Descartes said, “I studied the book of the world.”
Grazie mille
Excellent.
My two favorite thinkers
He kept his appetites and passions under strict control. Memorabilia or recollections of socrates by xenophon
Socrates can be said to have been an " anti-Sophist" considering the fact that at his time professional Sophists were highly respected for their " American Lawyers' style of spin-doctoring" almost any statements whereas Socrates began to develop a rational dialectic mindset( rather than a dialectic system ) , and yet he also agreed with the sophists that one can only approach the truth by dialectic without being led to firm convictions , in that sense Nietzsche distinguishes himself from Socrates for Nietzsche seems to have been affected by his firm emotional convictions.
Indeed! I did a video about the Apology that notes the similarities between Socrates and the Sophists, how he inverts their style of rhetoric into something designed *not* to persuade. Ironically, however, many Athenians would have seen Socrates as indistinguishable from a Sophist!
Here is the video: ua-cam.com/video/gvXFWV0jT2o/v-deo.htmlsi=IV6Jrs-b-0F4nMJr
I’m slowly becoming a sophist
Aren’t we all
An old punished philosopher
Wow
Nietzsche annoys me with his convoluted unclear writing. J.K. Chesterton said he wrote in metaphors because he didn't have the courage (or perhaps clarity) to say what is true. So, I only got 10 min into yr video. My impatient reading was that Nietzsche disliked Socrates for being the forefather of moral philosophy which preceded Christianity. Nietzsche hated Christianity which he considered weak and repressive. The Greek Moral Philosophy shared the Judaeo-Christian demand to discipline the passions by an ascetic life. The moral teachings of the Greeks were therefore compatible with Christianity. Nietzsche hated Christianity - yet he mimicked the gospels with his lonely solipsistic 'Thus Spake Zarathustra' - so he hated (to be simple) the Greek moral philosophers.
If you can’t read Nietzsche without enjoying the writing, stick to GK Chesterton. He’s a fine writer in his own right.
Your repeated use of the word “hate”, etc confirms for me that you indeed only watched 10 minutes of the video. Things aren’t so black and white.
People might have enjoyed Greek moral philosophy without Christianity's metaphysical baggage. Perhaps that oaf Chesterton couldn't comprehend such a perspective because he would be a fish out of water without his Christian metaphysics.
One of, is not the best channel on Neitzche and philosophy.
Mon dieu.
Kalos send me