Sigma 14mm f/1.8 ART | Image Quality, Coma, & Review | 4K
Вставка
- Опубліковано 5 жов 2024
- Sigma 14mm f/1.8 ART | Image Quality, Coma, & Review | Photographer Dustin Abbott breaks down other aspects of image quality, including coma (astrophotography!), distortion, autofocus performance, flare resistance, and more. He also delivers a final verdict on the lens. Read his final review here: bit.ly/14ARTabbott | Check out the Photo Gallery: bit.ly/sigma14ig | Purchase the 14mm f/1.8 ART: B&H Photo: bhpho.to/2iiXVhO| Amazon: amzn.to/2gQhDB7 | Amazon Canada: amzn.to/2ijfPkC | Amazon UK: amzn.to/2xGYAjG | Ebay: bit.ly/sigma14ART
Want to support this channel? Use these affiliate links to shop at:
B&H Photo: bhpho.to/1TA0Xge
Amazon: www.amazon.com...
Ebay: bit.ly/DustineBay
Make a donation via Paypal: paypal.me/dustinTWI
Get a discount off all Skylum Editing Software (Luminar, Aurora HDR, AirMagic) by using code DUSTINHDR at checkout: bit.ly/LuminarDLA
Become a Patron: / dustinabbott | Check me out on: Personal Website: dustinabbott.net/ | Sign up for my Newsletter: bit.ly/1RHvUNp | Instagram: bit.ly/DLAinsta | Google+: bit.ly/24PjMzv | Facebook: on. 1nuUUeH | Twitter: bit.ly/1RyYxIH | Flickr: bit.ly/1UcnC0B | 500px: bit.ly/1Sy2Ngu
My filming setup: Sony a7R III: B&H Photo: bhpho.to/2D6ibNO or Amazon: amzn.to/2CNxOvH | or | Sony a9 @ B&H Photo: bhpho.to/2HyWIyt or Amazon: amzn.to/2s1vYE0
Tamron 28-75mm F2.8 RXD @B&H Photo: bhpho.to/2FA00la or Amazon amzn.to/2G2kaEr
Lights: Rotolight AEOS @B&H Photo bhpho.to/2IK7mqV | Genaray Contender @B&H Photo: bhpho.to/33HbGNM | and Aputure AL-MW: bhpho.to/2N3MtZV
DISCLAIMER: This video and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Keywords: Sigma 14mm ART, Sigma 14mm f/1.8, Sigma 14mm f/1.8 ART, Sigma 14mm 1.8, Sigma 14mm 1.8 ART Review, Sigma 14mm Review, Sigma 14mm ART Review, Sigma 14mm f/1.8 Review, Review, Test, Video Test, Comparison, VS, Dustin Abbott, Photography, 2017, Lens Review, Distortion, Sharpness, Chromatic Aberration, CA, Color, Coma, Sigma 12-24mm f/4 ART, Canon EF 11-24mm f/4L, Canon 11-24, Tamron 15-30 VC, Tamron 15-30mm f/2.8, Canon 5D Mark IV, Canon EOS 5D Mark IV, Real World, Hands On, Samples Images, USB Dock, Weather Sealing, Sony a6500, Sigma MC-11
No one does the level of detailed reviews on UA-cam that you do! Thanks again!
On UA-cam, I enjoy some stuff from Joe Edelman, Tony & Chelsea Northrup, The Slanted Lens, and a few others. But lately I've been watching Dustin Abbott's reviews and feel the entire presentation he does are the best of the bunch. From the knowledge and facts, to the clean pressed shirts and way the video composition is framed. The entire thing is thought-out in detail from what's said, to how it's perceived. So agreed ... top-notch reviews. Cheers, MDV
Well, if we are planning to get this lens for astrophography it’s notable that there is coma wide open, but when does it go away, or does it go away? Just a few more shots at night would have clarified this.
12:07 that shot reminds me of a level in call of duty 4 modern warfare.
I can see that.
Dustin, great review again, I nearly chosed the Sigma but I went for the Irix option 15mm f2.4. I use that a lot for astro time lapses. Yes it collects less light but coma and astigmatism is well corrected, seems on par /or a little better with the Sigma. It's definitely better than the older Samyang 14mm UMC. Big advantage is that you can put a 95mm filter in front, the IRIX-filters are relatively cheap and much less phrone to fogging during the night compared to B+W / Hoya etc. Irix is close to non distorted. It's at its best at infinity, close up it's less sharp... Light source in the frame can form a halo, like the old Nikkor 24mm AIS 2,8. I think a comparison between Irix, Laowa, Sigm,a and Samyang...would be interesting
Great review as always Dustin! Thank you for taking the time in putting this review together.
My pleasure.
Thanks Dustin. I've got 2 a7 III's, an a6400 and Pocket 4K. That's a lot of mouths to feed when it comes to lenses, lol. I was looking at the Laowa 7.5mm f/2 and Voigt 10.5 to cover the wide ends of the P4K, I was lookin at the Sigma 16mm f/1.4 to cover the a6400's wide angle, and then something ultra wide for full frame as well. I also own the Sony 10-18mm and Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8. So with the right adapters (0.64x Speedbooster, MC-11), I can sell those 2 lenses and cover A LOT of ground with the14mm f/1.8. So thanks for the review, particularly the notes on the lines. Much appreciated!
You're welcome.
Wow... Great review, concise, lot of information, comparisons with competition... Perfect review.
Thanks for the feeback
I'm in search of the most perfect wide angle lens, this other wise would be impossible but so thank full that you have taken the time for us an narrow it down with every carefull detail Review, thank you Dustin Abbott
Glad I could help!
Thank you for the fine details, Dustin...really appreciate it!
My pleasure.
Just got mine and going to use it to shoot northern lights here in Tromsø, Norway. So far impressed with the light gathering of this lens. Timelapses and even filming the aurora will look so much better. So for me 14 mm f/1.8 is going to be amazing! Going to do a few tests on my own, but thanks for doing these tests (makes it easier for me to know what to look out for and worry about when shooting with this lens). Also got a mail from my camera shop that my a7r3 was shipped, so will be exciting to do some aurora shots with that combo (poor wallet though).
Ouch - your wallet is taking a hit. That should be a nice combination.
Dude, sick! I want both that Sigma lens and am thinking I'll very likely upgrade from my A7R II to the III as well. What an insane time for photo gear!
@wandererstraining: And it's not only photo, video as well. The new lenses are also amazing. So it's indeed an insane time for photo gear 👍
Hi am interested in this lens, and I like to photograph the northern lights, can you give me your comments once you test it on field ? It will be very appreciated. My Instagram is mmeri redlake and you can drop me a message there. Thank you !
Mauricio Neri Will do. Raining pretty bad here now, so no northern lights 😒
Indeed the picture at 9:49 looks really fantastic.
Thanks!
Nice thorough review!
Thank you!
Wait, you can only open the Tamron's aperture to f/3.2 on a Sony body? It must be some kind of communication mistake with the adapter. I have one for A-mount that I use with an LA-EA3 adapter, and I can open it to f/2.8 no problem.
But it's true that the Tamron doesn't have the best light gathering. I would definitely choose the Sigma over the Tamron for astro. I wouldn't even shoot the Sigma at f/1.8, either. Too much vignetting. I'd stop it down to f/2.8, and the image would pretty much be sharp from edge to edge, have almost no comatic aberrations and have quite an even brightness level. I always have to stop down my other lenses anyway, and to be honest, with what we have access to in terms of high ISO image quality and post-processing, it's worth trading one stop of light for better lens performance, as it will have a bigger impact on the final image than one stop in ISO. Especially with a Sony body. Hell, I've shot Milky Way photos with my A7R II using the Laowa 12mm at f/5.6 at ISO 800 with a nearly full moon in the frame, and managed to pull out a decent amount of detail in the Milky Way.
Fair enough. That makes sense.
Great video indeed. How does it compare over all with Sigma 14-24 f2.8 art lens.
It's been a while, so I'm working off deep memory. I really liked the 14-24 as an all around excellent wide angle option. That would probably be my choice.
Excellent review, once again !
Thanks
Thanks for the great review. Btw, your American Psycho impersonation is spot on!
Thanks, I guess...(I'm not very familiar with American Psycho).
Thank you for a full review on this lens Dustin. Just wanted to know if I'm better off getting a Sony mount lens for Alpha or use a speedbooster adaptor when shooting night sky photography? Much appreciated
If you are considering a speedbooster, does this mean you are using an APS-C camera body?
No Its an Alpha7 Mkiii Full frame
Thanks for the great review! especially on the coma aspect!
My pleasure.
May I ask would you be comparing Canon, Sigma, Samyang, etc 14mm primes?
Afraid not. I don't have time to do a massive project like that right now. This is concluding my coverage of the lens. I tend to reserve those projects for mainstream lenses, and 14mm lenses fall into the extremes.
I see. Once again, thanks again for the great review!
I bought a brand new sigma 14 art at 1350CAD, almost same price as samyang 14 f2.4 in Australia, if ignored the price factor, would you think this it the best lens in the class? Thank you
Probably the Sigma, if you don't mind the heft.
So that is coma at 2:00? I always assumed that was star trails when I'm doing astro work!
It would be very rare to see star trails at 15 seconds or less (it does depend on the focal length, but this is a very wide one, so near impossible). So what you are seeing is in fact comatic distortion.
Actually that is not coma. That is sagittal astigmatism. Comatic aberration looks like a meteor with a tail towards either the center or away from it. Here is some more on the matter of aberrations www.lonelyspeck.com/a-practical-guide-to-lens-aberrations-and-the-lonely-speck-aberration-test/
Thank You for a nice review. Very informative video
My pleasure.
I’m looking at this lens and mainly I need two things for live music photography, events, festivals and live music video.
I need the f/1.8 and fast accurate autofocus. From what I’ve seen it has at least 1 of the 2. I have the Tamron 15-30 f/2.8 . And yes it’s not f/2.8 probably 3.2 ish and the 15mm is closer to 16 I think . The autofocus in stage lighting situations is horrible so is the lens flare . Other than that like you I really like the Tamron. I believe I need this lens too .
Sounds like it might a good option for you. The Sigma 14-24mm F2.8 ART might be a good replacement for your Tamron, too.
Excellent work, thank you.
You're welcome.
Hello Dustin, thank you so much for the video
i've a question: i'm a real estate Videographer, could you please guive me a good option for me to upgrade my tools: i mean i need a good tilt shield shift lens (what is the best for me "can gather light inside little bit dark rooms") and what is the best camera for me (do you suggest me to get a a sony a7r iii !)
thank you so much again :) and keep going
There aren't many good tilt-shift options for Sony. Here's what I use: ua-cam.com/video/i7tcrYkFLxE/v-deo.html
Great review Dustin, thanks. This could make a nice accompaniment to the 18-35 & 50-100 1.8 for video shooters :)
Definitely. That final bit of framing.
You've seen better coma performance at 14mm f1. 8 or f2.0 in another lens? Which one? Thanks for the review. Subscribed.
Not at f/2 (as there is no other 14mm that has that wide of aperture), but I have seen better coma performance at f/2.4 in the Rokinon/Samyang XP 14mm.
Nice review!
Have you compared this lens with the milvus 15/2.8? I wonder how the sharpness and coma performance among the two lenses.
I haven't directly, but I've used both. Sigma has a bit more sharpness, Milvus more contrast and lower coma.
Excellent review as always Dustin. If it's heavier than the Tamron 15 - 30 then it's truly quite a lump lol Potential Astro photographers will have a lot to think about here with Sigma's offering.
True all around. Sigma doesn't seem to really consider weight in the equation anymore.
And it's interesting that they seem to just have gone for best possible image quality with no compromises. I think they probably made the right choice, as a 14mm f/1.8 in the past would probably have had an awful performance. Now, they can show those kinds of lenses can be made with good image quality (honestly, many people wouldn't have wanted to buy the lens if it had poor image quality, in which case almost anyone would have just gone for a slower lens anyway).
Could you compare this lens to Sigma 14 2.4?
I think you mean the Samyang F2.4, and in many ways I like the Samyang better. Better for astro, extremely sharp, has weather sealing, and is much cheaper.
Thanks for the review. What are a couple lenses you have in mind when talking about reduced distortion? Are you thinking the laowa 15 or 12 over the sigma if low distortion is the highest priority? I watched your review of the laowa 15, and it looks like the tradeoff would be less sharpness but lower distortion. The use case is for real estate videography. Appreciate your insight!
If you want to stick with Sigma, the 12-24mm F4 is a great choice.
Thank you!
Since Tamron 15-30mm f2.8 G2 came out ,I just can’t choose between sigma 14-24 f2.8 and Tamron 15-30 g2.
Which one do you suggest?
I’m using D750
If you don't think you need the VC, go with the Sigma.
Great work Dustin. Can i ask something? Since you've tested pretty much all of the art-series sigma lenses, which one would you recommend for astrophotography? The 14mm, the 20mm, the 24mm or the 14-24mm? Thank you!
Probably the 14-24mm, actually. It's the most flexible lens and delivers nice coma performance.
@@DustinAbbottTWI thank you very much!
Great reviews as ever Dustin, would be good to see it up against either the Zeiss 15mm/18mm lenses, not for the sharpness but for the colour and rendering.
You already know the answer to that. I've yet to see a Sigma that matches a Zeiss for color rendition.
Yes I know, but it would be good to show a comparison to others who have not experienced Zeiss glass as yet, they could get a taste and feel for what they are missing out on, your Canon/Zeiss 35mm lens review showed that to a degree ;)
The problem with a 14mm comparison is that it is a bit on the fringes. Doing comparisons is time consuming, and I typically do them with lenses firmly in the mainstream.
Dustin, If I may I would like to ask you a different question about your tutorials. What mic are you using and do you use a lot of post processing on your audio? I really enjoy your tutorials by the way :)
I use the Rode Smart Lav+, and just add an equalizer preset that I've built for my voice in post.
Gotcha Dustin and thanks for the response :)
One question, would you say the Tamron 15-30 has better or worse distortion than the Sigma 14mm?
Worse.
Do you prefer this or the 20mm 1.4 for astro?
I generally prefer a wider focal length for astro, but you should mostly choose based on what focal length you prefer. One is not radically better than the other for astro, though the 14mm is the sharper lens.
Hi, nice channel. Just saw the sony 24mm f1.4 gm. Not shure which one to buy for mikkyway photos. Thanks
I haven't tested the GM lens yet.
Compare to Zeiss classic 15mm f2.8? The Zeiss can be found cheaper than Sigma nowadays. Main focus is astro but also for stopped down landscape use. The vignetting on Zeiss is scary.
For landscape work I like the Zeiss. It has such amazing color. And yes, vignette is the primary weakness there.
@@DustinAbbottTWI thank you for your insight. I wouldnt think a zeiss would be lighter but in this case it is. Cheaper and lighter kind of seals the deal for me. I guess Sigma is new and not really available second hand
Mr. Abbott did you do any shots at 2.4 or 2.8 to see if the coma for this lens is on par with the other offerings in this class? I think that would be a more fair comparison of coma.
A few of the examples were at f/2.2, but I mostly shot at f/1.8, f/2, or f/2.2.
Dustin Abbott okay, thank you. I really enjoy your detailed reviews they are very informative and helpful.
Good review. Question: you said with the speedbooster on the sony it was same 1.4 aperture wide open? Are you sure!? How so? The only speedbooster ive ever seen for E mount is 0.71x which with the sigma lens equates to 1.8x0.71=1.28x1.5=1.91 or basically F2.0. Thats a whole stop lower light. Without the booster it would be f2.8 so you are getting about 1 full stop of extra light using the booster not 2 stops. Is there something im calculating wrong here?
The speedbooster shows a possible maximum aperture of F1.4. What you are doing is reapplying the crop factor, which is a different matter. The light gathering potential will actually be F1.4, though depth of field will be close to F2.
Thank you.
Thanks for the great and detailed review. It really does make me interested to know how good the coma performance is with the new Venus Optics Laowa 12mm f/2.8 lens. I'm impressed with the reduced distortion, but does that coma and astigmatism also come through as low or better than the Sigma or Rokinon for Astro photography. I shoot on the Sony A7R3 now.
I just watched your review of the Laowa 12mm Lens and it looks like it has worse coma than the Sigma and Rokinon.
The Rokinon is the best of the bunch for coma.
Looks like a very nice lens. I'd trade my Tamron 15-30 for it.
It is a nice lens.
Hi Dustin, I'm currently making the move from Canon to Sony (A73 body) and I'm very interested in this lens. One question springs to mind... Is the weight of the lens putting to much work on camera mount? Could it break the mount?
Not just asking about A73, I would also ask the same question if I was using DSLR.
Thanks very much for your comprehensive content in all your reviews and best wishes for 2019,
Regards,
Trevor
I don’t believe that at all. Sony has had to design with the tolerances of heavier lenses in mind. I’ve obviously used a lot of different lenses on my a7R3 without any issue.
Thanks for the quick reply. Happy New Year and best wishes for 2019
Please tell Which is better sigma 14mm 1.8 or canon 14mm 2.8 for video
I would go for the Sigma, myself.
Devin Graham was using Canon 14mm a lot.
What lens and camera were you using to record this?
That info is always at the end of each review video. I wouldn't remember off the top of my head, as this was at least 100 lenses back.
Dustin ... Mr. Abbott ... thanks for the review. Just ordered Zeiss Milvus 85mm 1.4, partly on your reviews. Started the week shopping 14mm, and ended up with a 3rd 85mm !! PS .. when you are ready to shoot in the coast redwoods, drop a line ... Cheers, MDV / www.mdvaden.com/redwoods.shtml
Enjoy the lenses. The Milvus 1.4/85 is sweet.
What
Adapter do you use from nikon to Sony
I don't shoot Nikon, so I don't have that answer.
Can you please review the canon 11 - 24 f4
Not in the near future, unfortunately. I have a long line-up of review items.
Hi Dustin, do you have any idea if the lens can work well on Fujifilm GFX bodies? Some guys told me that the covering circles of Sigma art lenses are large enough for Fuji's cropped medium format sensors.
I've heard that before, but I don't know the answer definitively.
Thanks Dustin
If looking for a wide lens for my A7RIII to pair with a Tamron 28-75 f/2.8, I am curious if one would recommend this lens, the Batis 18mm, Batis 25mm, Sigma 14-24mm (I'd need an adapter), or Sigma 20mm f/1.4? I would like a solid astro lens, but am hoping to get more use out of it than that. Something that will prove more versatile and pair well with the sony including AF uses.
The Batis 18mm would be a nice pairing with the 28-75 focal length. The Sigma 14-24 is a great lens, too, but it would be pretty huge.
Thank you! You're only person I know who has put the 14-24 and 14 Sigmas both onto the A7R III. I know you will not complete a full comparison, but based on your limited knowledge do you think the differences between the 14-24 and the 14 at 14mm and f/2.8 are negligible?
I think the 14-24 is probably equally sharp. They are both near perfect.
Super helpful review, Thanks! Question: I am a Sony e mount shooter, looking for a great real estate photo/video lens. Now that this sigma 14mm is avail in E mount, I'm thinking its a great option. from a price point I looked at the Rokinon premium f2.4, but it is only for EF or F mount. Also the rokinon 2.8 14mm AF lens is a good option at less than half the price, but lens hood is attached, more chromatic aberration, and a couple others cons. Now that its been a couple years, do you have any updated thoughts? Thanks so much!
Is real estate your top priority? If so, also consider either the Laowa 15mm F2 (lower distortion) or the Laowa 12mm F2.8 (in Canon EF mount) along with the Magic Shift Converter (for Sony FE). It turns the 12mm into a 17mm F4 lens...but with 10 degrees of shift. Very useful for interiors.
@@DustinAbbottTWI Thanks a ton. Ill check them out!
I’ve got reviews of both and actually own both
Hi Dustin, excellent review. I hope you can help me with the hard decision to buy my first lens for astrophotography. I saw a lot of reviews about the Rokinon 14 2.4, tamron 15-30 2.8, irix 15 2.4 and laowa 12 2.8, but I can't decide yet, this sigma's price is prohibitive to me.
Best regards!
Of those lenses (I've test all but one), I think the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 is the best bet for astro.
Dustin Abbott thanks so much
Hi Dustin. Can I use the rokinon 14 mm in a canon full frame ? Thanks
Mauricio Neri Yes, you can. The Rokinon 14mm is a full frame lens
AF-C works perfectly in the A7-III. Less glass = more light.
I'm not sure if your final point bears out. Some of the best lenses out there have a fair bit of glass. I would suspect it has more to do with the quality of the glass.
@@DustinAbbottTWI The thinner glass the better?
Not necessarily. There are different grades of optical glass and different materials used in lens elements. Just drawing a conclusion based on the number of elements in an optical design is inconclusive at best.
@@DustinAbbottTWI The less f/stop at the lens is usually better performing than those w/ a higher min f/stop?
Good✊
Thank you
Wow...Sigma is killing it. Its a shame their 24-70 wasnt awesome! SO far I have the 50mm and 24mm 1.4 Art Lenses. Far superior to the competition!
It's a strong lens, for sure.
what camera version is this?
??? The main camera body used for testing was the Canon 5D Mark IV.
Hi Dustin,
I wanted to get either a Rokinon SP 24mm f/2.4 or a Sigma 14mm f/1.8 for astro-landscape photography. I love the specs of the Sigma but its price is making me question taking the leap. What would you say is the most practical? I actually need to buy 2 lenses and i was considering also getting a Tamron SP 15-30mm f/2.8 to cover a wider area of photography genres. I have a budget of $2500 dollars and after already investing in a new 5D mk.iv i need 2 decent lens to cover my interest in Landscape, astro-landscape and dipping my toes in other areas very occasionally. What would be your experienced opinion and most practical solution? I hike to my shooting spots so i don't want to carry any monster lenses... Thanks
I would go with the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 to cover your astro and wide landscape. It's more compact than the Sigma and has better coma performance. You could compliment that with something like the Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 G2 lens and cover a big chunk of your shooting needs.
Thanks for the reply Dustin. I will have to look into the Tamron 24-70mm f/2.4 even after everyone telling me to get the Tamron SP 15-30mm f/2.8 as a general purpose.
Would you recommend the Sigma art 14mm f/1.8 over the Rokinon SP 24mm f/2.4 for my astro/landscape needs or would you say it is too wide for general daytime landscape? I want a landscape/Astro-landscape lens that is high quality but can also be used for both as these genres are my main preference of shooting. After looking at the Tamron 24-70mm it is cheap enough that i can buy it along with the Sigma 1.4 but i am trying to justify investing in the Sigma due to its low 1.8 aperture for astro-landscape... Buying new lenses is so frustrating with so many choices and after buying my first full-frame body(5D mk.iv) i just do not know what to choose!
I'm recommending the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 (SP version).
Many thanks! I feel confident now on what to buy after the advice!
Not exactly on topic or relevant to this video but can you recommend a great lens for wildlife that isn't heavy and easy to transport? Will the Tamron 24-70mm you recommended be suited for that? I was thinking it will probably not be suited for that genre of shooting. Sorry for the Long Q&A, i can appreciate you must be busy.
Para abrir a lente uo desmontar a sima
I'm willing to trade my Canon 24-70 mm F 2.8 for this lens.
Interesting. I think I'd rather compliment it.
I bought the Sigma 50mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Lens for my Canon. The Canon 24-70 mm F 2.8 was put on the way side since then. So a good trade is a good deal for the 14mm.
ok, and wich one is class leading ( Nikon ) don´t care about price!
I would say this Sigma is.
thank you Dustin !
Best
dustin suggest me sharpest lens for astro work ?
I currently think the Rokinon/Samyang 14mm f/2.4 is the best astro lens I've used. bhpho.to/2BNghk2. It's currently $250 off for the Canon mount.
Dustin Abbott thanku I love All ur videos
Going from 7 minutes to 10 , 15.... 23 minutes to ... I stop watching your channel (this is the last clip i watch) ... too much of talking... please make it short, straight to the point... we’re only have 24 hrs a day... .. Thank You
Most of my subscribers are asking for more detail, not less. There are often alternatives from other reviewers that are very brief. The consensus from most of my viewers is that they look to me for the more detailed information.
I personally like straight forward, Honest and detailed reviews. Guess you can't please everyone...
And unsubscribe too... i understand you have to create contents to make money. But 3 video clips, 20 minutes length each for a single lens review is tooo much...
Umm, to my knowledge I make no more money for long videos as I do short ones.
Eh? But who is asking you to watch them? There is an extraordinary amount of choice from many different people.
Azntrutek2012
It’s called being thorough... which is a good thing. Lenses aren’t cheap so many people (like me) appreciate Dustin’s hard work.