F-4 Phantom II - McDonnell Douglas Supersonic Jet Interceptor And Fighter Bomber

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 лис 2024
  • The McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II is an American tandem two-seat, twin-engine, all-weather, long-range supersonic jet interceptor and fighter-bomber originally developed by McDonnell Aircraft for the United States Navy. Proving highly adaptable, it entered service with the Navy in 1961 before it was adopted by the United States Marine Corps and the United States Air Force, and by the mid-1960s it had become a major part of their air arms. Phantom production ran from 1958 to 1981, with a total of 5,195 aircraft built, making it the most-produced American supersonic military aircraft in history and cementing its position as a signature combat aircraft of the Cold War.
    The Phantom is a large fighter with a top speed of over Mach 2.2. It can carry more than 18,000 pounds (8,400 kg) of weapons on nine external hardpoints, including air-to-air missiles, air-to-ground missiles, and various bombs. The F-4, like other interceptors of its time, was initially designed without an internal cannon. Later models incorporated an M61 Vulcan rotary cannon. Beginning in 1959, it set 15 world records for in-flight performance, including an absolute speed record and an absolute altitude record.
    The F-4 was used extensively during the Vietnam War. It served as the principal air superiority fighter for the U.S. Air Force, Navy, and Marine Corps and became important in the ground attack and aerial reconnaissance roles late in the war. During the Vietnam War, all five American servicemen who became aces - one U.S. Air Force pilot, two weapon systems officers (WSOs), one U.S. Navy pilot, and one radar intercept officer (RIO) - did so in F-4s. The F-4 continued to form a major part of U.S. military air power throughout the 1970s and 1980s, being gradually replaced by more modern aircraft such as the F-15 Eagle and F-16 Fighting Falcon in the U.S. Air Force, the F-14 Tomcat in the U.S. Navy, and the F/A-18 Hornet in the U.S. Navy and U.S. Marine Corps.
    General characteristics
    Crew: 2
    Length: 63 ft 0 in (19.2 m)
    Wingspan: 38 ft 5 in (11.7 m)
    Width: 27 ft 7 in (8.4 m) wing folded
    Height: 16 ft 5 in (5 m)
    Wing area: 530 sq ft (49.2 m2)
    Aspect ratio: 2.77
    Airfoil: NACA 0006.4-64 root, NACA 0003-64 tip
    Empty weight: 30,328 lb (13,757 kg)
    Gross weight: 41,500 lb (18,824 kg)
    Max takeoff weight: 61,795 lb (28,030 kg)
    Maximum landing weight: 36,831 lb (16,706 kg)
    Fuel capacity: 1,994 US gal (1,660 imp gal; 7,550 L) internal, 3,335 US gal (2,777 imp gal; 12,620 L) with 2x 370 US gal (310 imp gal; 1,400 L) external tanks on the outer wing hardpoints and either a 600 or 610 US gal (500 or 510 imp gal; 2,300 or 2,300 L) tank for the center-line station.
    Powerplant: 2 × General Electric J79-GE-17A after-burning turbojet engines, 11,905 lbf (52.96 kN) thrust each dry, 17,845 lbf (79.38 kN) with afterburner
    Performance
    Maximum speed: 1,280 kn (1,470 mph, 2,370 km/h) at 40,000 ft (12,000 m)
    Maximum speed: Mach 2.23
    Cruise speed: 510 kn (580 mph, 940 km/h)
    Combat range: 370 nmi (420 mi, 680 km)
    Ferry range: 1,457 nmi (1,677 mi, 2,699 km)
    Service ceiling: 60,000 ft (18,000 m)
    Rate of climb: 41,300 ft/min (210 m/s)
    Lift-to-drag: 8.58
    Wing loading: 78 lb/sq ft (380 kg/m2)
    Thrust/weight: 0.86 at loaded weight, 0.58 at MTOW
    Takeoff roll: 4,490 ft (1,370 m) at 53,814 lb (24,410 kg)
    Landing roll: 3,680 ft (1,120 m) at 36,831 lb (16,706 kg)
    Armament
    E-model has a 20 mm (0.787 in) M61A1 Vulcan cannon mounted internally under the nose, 640 rounds
    Up to 18,650 lb (8,480 kg) of weapons on nine external hardpoints, including general-purpose bombs, cluster bombs, TV- and laser-guided bombs, rocket pods, air-to-ground missiles, anti-ship missiles, gun pods, and nuclear weapons. Reconnaissance, targeting, electronic countermeasures baggage pods, and external fuel tanks may also be carried.
    4× AIM-9 Sidewinders on wing pylons, Israeli F-4 Kurnass 2000 carried Python-3, Japanese F-4EJ Kai carry AAM-3.
    4× AIM-7 Sparrow in fuselage recesses, upgraded Hellenic F-4E and German F-4F ICE carry AIM-120 AMRAAM, UK Phantoms carried Skyflash missiles
    6× AGM-65 Maverick
    4× AGM-62 Walleye
    4× AGM-45 Shrike, AGM-88 HARM, AGM-78 Standard ARM
    4× GBU-15
    18× Mk.82, GBU-12
    5× Mk.84, GBU-10, GBU-14
    18× CBU-87, CBU-89, CBU-58
    Nuclear weapons, including the B28EX, B61, B43 and B57
    Watch more aircraft, heroes, and their stories and missions ➤ / @dronescapes
    To support/join the channel ➤ / @dronescapes
    IG ➤ / dronescapesvideos
    FB ➤ / dronescapesvideos
    X/Twitter ➤ dronescapes.vi...
    THREADS ➤ www.threads.ne...
    #f4phantom #aircraft #aviation

КОМЕНТАРІ • 98

  • @Dronescapes
    @Dronescapes  6 місяців тому +11

    Watch more aircraft, heroes, and their stories and missions ➤ www.youtube.com/@Dronescapes
    To support/join the channel ➤ www.youtube.com/@Dronescapes/join
    IG ➤ instagram.com/dronescapesvideos
    FB ➤ facebook.com/Dronescapesvideos
    ➤ X/Twitter ➤ dronescapes.video/2p89vedj
    ➤ THREADS: www.threads.net/@dronescapesvideos
    ---------
    ➤➤ PBY CATALINA ➤➤ ua-cam.com/video/2qlMbZ70rqc/v-deo.html
    ➤➤ HIGHER RESOLUTION IMAGE ➤➤ tinyurl.com/bdenrjw9
    ➤ Click the link to watch more aircraft, heroes, and their stories and missions: www.youtube.com/@Dronescapes
    ➤ IG: instagram.com/dronescapesvideos
    ➤ FB: facebook.com/Dronescapesvideos
    ➤ X: tinyurl.com/m86k2ypf

  • @brealistic3542
    @brealistic3542 6 місяців тому +20

    The British Navy loved their F4s. I don't know of any country flying them that didn't. Truly ONE of the great Jet fighters.

  • @rickmcbride9865
    @rickmcbride9865 4 місяці тому +10

    ❤ I lived in St Louis by Lambert Field and I used to see a whole Squadron of phantom sitting there and they were awesome and I always remember it and it's one of my favorite airplanes ever

  • @gownerjones
    @gownerjones 21 день тому +1

    My dad served in the German Luftwaffe for 12 years and he worked on the electronic systems of these magnificent planes. To this day, he loves the F-4. He has pictures of it on his walls, he bought the plane in MFS and flies it every day. He infected me with an enthusiasm for military aviation and now I, too, love the F-4.

  • @JohnShields-xx1yk
    @JohnShields-xx1yk 2 місяці тому +2

    1970 I was 10 when we had a Christmas at grandparent's house, Nanna had glass ornaments with the grandkids name on them, " John ", I felt so loved, luckily my uncle Jack was there, on leave where he piloted the F4 Phantom in Vietnam, I was in awe, still am. God bless the United States of America 🇺🇸

  • @wmjohns881
    @wmjohns881 6 місяців тому +16

    I was an navy aviation ordnance AO2 during the Vietnam war. My specialty was both the F-4 and the A-4
    I really liked how easy it was to access and repair the weapons systems on the Phantom.
    The F-4 was a very rugged fighter and could handle a lot of damage without going down.

    • @halojump123
      @halojump123 6 місяців тому +1

      🇺🇸🇷🇺🇺🇸🇷🇺🇺🇸🇷🇺U.S ARMY VETERAN.

  • @simple_beys
    @simple_beys 5 місяців тому +19

    The greatest distributor of MiG parts.

  • @kennethhoffman8845
    @kennethhoffman8845 2 місяці тому +5

    It's amazing to think that in just 4 years Mcdonnell went from introducing the clumsy, underpowered F-3 Demon in 1956 to this incredible BEAST in 1960.

  • @markusfuerer5431
    @markusfuerer5431 4 місяці тому +4

    My fav model from Revell as a kid in the 70s .
    And I glued the back wings the wrong way around 😂

    • @kennethhoffman8845
      @kennethhoffman8845 2 місяці тому +1

      I did the Revell kits that included all four Blue Angels and all four Thunderbirds. They had a special stand that put them in diamond formation. This was back around 1972. I've been trying to locate these kits through sources like Ebay and Mercari from collectors who may have them buried in a closet somewhere. No luck so far.

  • @801walt
    @801walt Місяць тому +1

    My favorite fighter. I was lucky to see the Thunderbirds flying F4s when I was 10 or 11. Built a model in camo colors.

  • @72151
    @72151 4 місяці тому +4

    RF4C crew chief here…
    Strong airframe, usually leaks something somewhere, very smooth to fly.

  • @kevingthompson14
    @kevingthompson14 2 місяці тому +2

    There were more variants than letters in the alphabet. In stripped down trials they made mach 3.2.
    Once that nose gun was added it made for the PERFECT flying tiger grin.
    The navy loved them. The marines depended on them. The air force insisted on them against the entire USAF brass.
    Robin Olds and Randy Cunningham became living legends flying them. Hell, Olds staked his entire career upon absolute insistence on having them as he as adamant to not send any more guys to Hanoi Hilton by transport of Thud aka Thundercheif.
    You gotta love these things. Those JOLLY ROGER tail fins. The SUNDOWNER tail fins.
    These things were the stuff so many young men dreamed about joining service for in the 70s and 80s.
    I was one of those.

  • @user-clintredwood
    @user-clintredwood 6 місяців тому +80

    I know many will disagree but the phantom is the sexist jet fighter ever!! Ive loved her since i can remember. Im not talking capabilities, im talk look ,style

    • @iamnotpaulavery
      @iamnotpaulavery 6 місяців тому +9

      I'm with you on that. When I was working on a degree in computer aided drafting and design, my project for the three dimensional design class was actually the F4. I painstakingly hand drew, measured, scaled, etc., etc. the jet then drew it on the computer, extruded everything...long story short I aced the class and the instructor literally framed my work and put it on his office wall - with my permission of course. Me? It's on a ZIP disc, which is totally obsolete! I have a ZIP drive, but my computer won't even recognize it. Thankfully, I was able to make one large printout which is tucked away and hidden so well I forgot where the hell I put it!!

    • @RB-bd5tz
      @RB-bd5tz 6 місяців тому +6

      I had a die-cast metal toy of one as a kid. I have always thought it looked so cool, with the angled wing and tail surfaces. It looked solid, mean, and capable; it looked like business, like a real war machine.

    • @user-clintredwood
      @user-clintredwood 6 місяців тому +3

      @@RB-bd5tz yup absolutly. My thoughts exactly!

    • @oceanforth21
      @oceanforth21 6 місяців тому +5

      Yeah can’t really agree. The phantom is a good looking aircraft, but it’s not sexy. It’s not a sleek jet. It’s menacing and imposing. It’s a rook, not a bishop

    • @garyr2650
      @garyr2650 6 місяців тому +3

      I agreev

  • @kennethhoffman8845
    @kennethhoffman8845 2 місяці тому +2

    One of the sometimes overlooked aspects of the Phantom's design is the completely flush underside of the wings. It allowed a nearly unobstructed surface for the attachment of weapons and external fuel tanks.

  • @ridermak4111
    @ridermak4111 3 місяці тому +2

    Unmistakable from any view angle. 👊😎

    • @jimmeryellis
      @jimmeryellis 2 місяці тому +1

      Unmistakable but still not as awsome as the English Electric Lightening.

  • @jimgraham6722
    @jimgraham6722 5 місяців тому +9

    I flew these, fantastic.

    • @kennethhoffman8845
      @kennethhoffman8845 2 місяці тому +2

      I remember an interview with an Israeli pilot who described its 'tremendous acceleration' its 'tremendous kick'. I suspect there were times when you got a sense of being invincible.

  • @Sam_Green____4114
    @Sam_Green____4114 Місяць тому

    An F-4 Phantom flew over my house the other day ! Not just one but two in formation !! And not just once , several times !

  • @vittoriocasassa7611
    @vittoriocasassa7611 6 місяців тому +3

    Sin duda el avión MÁS HERMOSO que se a construido...
    Gracias por tan buen video.😅😅😅

  • @HarperBrown-mr9bc
    @HarperBrown-mr9bc 4 місяці тому +2

    F-4 is a top model jet in the world

  • @matteocrotti6781
    @matteocrotti6781 Місяць тому +1

    PHANTOM FOREVER ❤

  • @Gator-357
    @Gator-357 4 місяці тому +2

    The B-17 was the first heavy bomber to use both a supercharger and a turbo charger in succession in order to maintain full speed at height.

  • @AnthonyTolhurst-dw1nc
    @AnthonyTolhurst-dw1nc 6 місяців тому +4

    PHABULOUS PHANTOM PHOREVER!

  • @robmorgan1214
    @robmorgan1214 11 днів тому +2

    I want a titanium composite F4 with GE F110s and fly by wire avionics (including computer controlled intake ramps) the thing would supercruise and hit Mach 3 without melting. Combat weight 30000lbs with 34000lbs thrust out of burner. Range 2300 mi. Max takeoff 70000lbs 12500 lbs internal fuel. No stealth... but that doesn't really work as Iran recently proved.
    Saving 8000lbs on steel and aluminum has a major impact on performance.

  • @mikestanmore2614
    @mikestanmore2614 2 місяці тому +1

    When you compare the exhaust from the British Spey engined Phantom with the American version, the British aircraft is practically the stealth version!

  • @orucreyisguven9672
    @orucreyisguven9672 Місяць тому +1

    Türk Hava kuvvetleri İsrail hava endüstrisi ile birlikte geliştirdiği F4E Phantom terminator uçaklarını hala başarıyla kullanmakta . Her ne kadar günümüz modern çağının stealth vb özelliklerinin çok uzağında olsa da Phantom yüksek hızı manevra kaabiliyeti hava hava ve hava yer tercübesi ile çok etkili bir görev uçağı. Jet savaş uçağı dünyasında F-14 tomcat ile birlikte en ikonik tasarıma sahip uçaktır Phantom

  • @Rogge73
    @Rogge73 28 днів тому

    1958 mind boggling 😮😮😮😮

  • @kkpriest5880
    @kkpriest5880 6 місяців тому +11

    2 more days ladies and gentlemen

    • @Spooky_32
      @Spooky_32 6 місяців тому

      Phantom gaming

    • @Royalasiangaming
      @Royalasiangaming 6 місяців тому +1

      real idk why they couldn't drop it last Friday

    • @marcolinji
      @marcolinji 6 місяців тому

    • @RedTail1-1
      @RedTail1-1 6 місяців тому

      I've been flying the F-4 in DCS for over 2 years. Y'all been missing out.

  • @DavidSherman-m5l
    @DavidSherman-m5l 4 місяці тому

    The meatball is located on the PORT side of the flight deck on the aft area of the flight deck. Not the right side, as you stated.

  • @chandrachurniyogi8394
    @chandrachurniyogi8394 5 місяців тому +1

    the naval carrier borne F-4E Phantom II (Block 30) multi role fighter interceptor is called legendary for a reason . . . it was unwise to design the F-4 without the invaluable 20 MM internal gun . . . that are normally built into the forward lower fuselage or wing root section of fighter jets . . . during take off the front landing gear of the carrier borne F-4E Phantom II multi role fighter interceptor is raised up as the aft part of the F-4E is hunkered down with the bridal . . . would like to know why . . .

    • @jimginn4021
      @jimginn4021 5 місяців тому

      The F-4E was the Air Force’s version which did have a Vulcan 20 mm cannon. Navy phantoms raised the nose to increase the angle of attack, meaning the plane generates more lift this way when it needs it most.

  • @abitofapickle6255
    @abitofapickle6255 6 місяців тому +5

    With enough thrust, even a brick can fly.

    • @keithad6485
      @keithad6485 6 місяців тому +1

      I remember years ago, reading that the F4 was America's proof to the world that they could make a brick fly!

    • @PostalWorker14
      @PostalWorker14 5 місяців тому +2

      Saw one at Air Force Museum massive engine wings are weird and small

  • @RB-bd5tz
    @RB-bd5tz 6 місяців тому +1

    44:29, 44:41 Pharting Phantoms!

  • @ExploreTechniques95
    @ExploreTechniques95 2 місяці тому +1

    It certainly participated in the war in Southeast Asia.

  • @futursbrite
    @futursbrite 6 місяців тому +1

    in just a few days the dcs simulator will come out😮

  • @dawightg9787
    @dawightg9787 Місяць тому

    The phantoms was a great fighter, However the pilots was not trained to Dogfight during the 60s Due to the BVR Doctrine held by the Top Brass of that Era . However Brave men stood up to them and started to retrain pilots how to Dogfight at a school they started called Fighter weapons school.,These Naval pilots would achieve a 24:1 kill ratio during Vietnam. Unfortunately the Air Force decided to blame the plane rather than the method and kept the 2:1 ratio throughout Vietnam. Not until after Vietnam did the Airforce change its methods to what they are today..

  • @marcosavila8215
    @marcosavila8215 5 місяців тому +3

    wHO IS HERE because of DCS?

    • @mikeck4609
      @mikeck4609 4 місяці тому

      lol…it’s not a coincidence that every time DCS releases a module, UA-cam videos and books about it see ALOT more traffic! Almost every fighter pilot podcast/you tube content creator will tell you that DCS is what pays the bills

  • @djpalindrome
    @djpalindrome 4 місяці тому +1

    I remember when the Thunderbirds flew Phantoms at full afterburner, supposedly to drown out the anti war protesters 😅

    • @801walt
      @801walt Місяць тому +1

      And I was mad when a couple years later they replaced them with T-38 trainers. boo. (saw both)

  • @Darthdoodoo
    @Darthdoodoo Місяць тому +1

    I prefer the f14 tomcruise myself 😂

  • @andrewleyden2752
    @andrewleyden2752 3 місяці тому

    What is the date of that second video?

  • @ArktikosAdventures
    @ArktikosAdventures 6 місяців тому +1

    More DCS research...

  • @dreemeagle
    @dreemeagle 3 місяці тому +1

    a fantastic interceptor as it was designed to be but terrible dogfighter whose only triumphant tactic was zoom and boom;

  • @801walt
    @801walt Місяць тому

    Iran. Don't they still have a few?

  • @shenmisheshou7002
    @shenmisheshou7002 6 місяців тому +2

    Many criticized the F-4 for not having a gun, but the designers were right not to include it. The main problems in Vietnam were defective sidewinders, BVR engagement limitations, and poor pilot training. As to the supremacy of the gun, even the "Last Gunfighter", the F8, only had to gun kills, with all of the rest being sidewinder kills. In fact, no US fighter has had a gun kill against an enemy fighter since 1970. All US fighter kills since then have been missile kills. So, the F-4 designers had it exactly right. No human pilot can out-maneuver a sidewider, which can pull 60 Gs.

  • @Anti-6789
    @Anti-6789 Місяць тому

    We here for decepticon blutzwing🤑🤑🤑

  • @johnrisher3007
    @johnrisher3007 29 днів тому

    I'm sorry but any fighter aircraft without guns is a very bad idea