Still annoys me that WG named it the Object 279(e) when it should be named Object 726. Also, one of the designs for the Object had it mount an E5-style machine gun turret/cupola, and I think it would have been interesting if they reworked the model to give it that cupola but stronger hull armor. Theoretically could have fixed the armor problems it has in Tier 10 games and Tier 8 games; stronger hull protects against premium rounds while cupola gives lower tiers a weak spot they can actually pen from the front.
the thing is, 726 was the name given to it because they further developed the 279 to a finished product. earlier it was called the 279 early. wg is not entirely wrong in calling it that plus they were thinking of adding by the 726 name back in supertest
i like to call the chief now a chief p with more alpha ever since i found the nerfs. The reload is identical and pen is almost identical now. only difference is now the smaller cupola
And the chief p is worse than phase 1 so that means chief only has more hp armor and speed because of the tier, decent nerfs but the 279 one wanst enough well at least if you dont have an jag in your team
@@joaoguilherme9034 the 279 couldve used a bigger mobility nerf, cause the thing is, a lot of things with 280+ pen will autopen them as soon as the 279 angles a slight bit. the thing is, many tanks in wot are only good against -2. so if wg decreased the traverse for example it would allow tier 8 tanks to outflank it and get its vulnerable side. like max said, the armor profile is fine, its only dumb when youre facing it head on as a tier 8.
The problem with these two vehicles wasn't the shell penetration, it wasn't their health point pools, frankly it wasn't even their mobility. The armor is the issue for both of them: T95/FV4201 needs a bigger cupola model Object 279e needs weaker hull armor or a bigger cupola weak point. I have not experienced any change whatsoever with these two vehicles, sure they're a tiny touch slower to get into position but the thing that makes them so OP wasn't touched at all. Chieftain is still a S-Tier hull-down beast that basically nothing shy of arty can do anything to, and the 279e still doesn't have a viable weak-spot on the front aside from loading up high heat pen tanks to hard counter it by slamming HEAT rounds at it nonstop. Edit: Either touch the armor, or remove both tank's ability to see lower than tier 10. Tier IX pen is barely able to in most cases and tier 8 pen is not enough unless the Chief/279e player is dumb af and shows full rear!
nonsense, so we should remove ability to see low tiers for everything they cant pen? Like maus, pz7, is7, E100 etc and armor is just a part of the problem, you can nerf armor they still would be too strong because everything was too good
@@durachoks IS-7 has an underplate, Maus has 260mm turret cheeks, Pz VII has a side scrape weakspot and an underplate that is easy to exploit, E 100 has an underplate, flat sides and flat rear. 279e doesn't even have an lower glacis weak point, the cupolas are tiny and really only high skilled players or tier 10 players with big premium pen can deal with. Regular tech tree tier 10s have weak points you can clearly see and exploit given your knowledge on how to get a good angle. 279e's weak points are only really exploitable when you have a gun with extremely decent-to-high penetration, of which 97% of tier 8 tanks do not possess, The biggest reason why the 279e gets so much hate and is called OP is because against -2 tanks it's literally impossible to fight unless you can manage to get it's rear, which is not always an option. Tier 10s at least have the option of firing high pen AP/APCR/HEAT that can just plow through the armor or at minimum give and advantage where lower tiers would have a 0% chance of damaging. You can bring up any tier 10 tank and any tier 8 combination, outside of preferential premiums and I can tell you exactly how to counter it or at least get angles where you can reliably penetrate and deal with it, the 279e on the other hand, the best advice for anyone who isn't in a high penetration tank, is just to simply ran tf away and hope your team mates can deal with it. It's unfair to have -2 tiers fighting something they literally cannot beat unless the 279e player is a tard
@@K_LeShaeya lol I just want to see how you deal with Maus or Pz7 "weakspots" in your tier 8 tank xD also that easy to exploit is7 lower plate is almost 250mm, point is you cant do shit to those tanks, unless you get side, and same is true for 279e
I still think better nerfs would be proper weakspots, but I'm also sure that changes in models are harder than just those numbers they touched - and they are fine imo too.
The only needed nerfs for those 2 tanks was really weekspots, Now they are kinda worse but still fucking toxic in certain scenarios as they were before
14:34: "If you nerf the gun handling even more...". But they didn't touch its gun handling, dude. The only metric of the gun nerfed was RoF/dpm. Unless you consider that as part of "gun handling", which it is not. Chieftain has an excellent gun handling btw (0.14/0.14/0.11 dispersion factors + 0.35 base accuracy and 2.1 sec base aiming time).
Those 2 tanks should bd locked to T10 only. Also should not be allowed to platoon & should have forced mirroring when in the random que. A platoon of 3 chiefs vs all TT is just a auto loss & still happened yesterday on my server.
dont even need to limit the tier just limit the platoon number for reward tanks. if you lock them or mirror them the match maker is gonna take as long as war thunders
@@NakiriX1 Tier X tanks struggle to fight a good 279e player, and are forced to fire higher penetration HEAT/AP/APCR. Tier Xs have to do this it beat unless you can somehow manage to flank, Tier VIIIs have like same special ammo pen as TIER IX standard pens and you're saying they shouldn't be locked to Tier X only?!
Why isn't anyone talking about how broken these tanks are in CW? in the last CW, teams stacked with chiefs and 279e were dominating the games..... they seriously need to address this or at least reintroduce tank locking so that this cancer can be controlled!!
I stopped playing WOT for the simple fact that the majority of the matches are just too unforgiving. If the MM kept matches to +0 and +1/-1, it would be more enjoyable. As those matches last longer, and you can actually play the game as intended. If its +2/-2, the matches just get overblown with the top tanks and good players yolo pushing the lowest tier tanks in the match. Not to mention tier 8 is super saturated with premium tanks that are downtiered tier 9 tanks...
I have maintained my position regarding +2/-2 as a bad idea. It should be +1/-1. Wargaming need to address clan wars desperately and have a mode somewhere between that and random battles that works. I've played clan wars. The problem is lack of variety in tanks and it can easily turn into a full time job. Not to mention the amount of waiting around that can occur or multiple battles that happen at once which you can't fulfill.
If you were in the city with the Object instead of the Chieftain when the obj came and grille on you with the Obj 279e you were dead. And people cry about this tank 🫣🫣🫣
They should not nerf but fix the matchmaking ... put same class and same tank with same number of skills ... number of field modification , same tier , close to same number of game with the tank in the matchmaking ... etc and you will start to see good game with normal time not a 2 min game with a score of 2-15 or 15-2 etc..... Wargaming does not care of how matchmaking works.... and dont mention.... well the pool of players etc ..... if you only have 10 tanks that match well do a 5 vs 5 .... just have a 15 max tanks match but no minimun ... You will stat to see game with 14-15, 15-14 with a 15 minutes time .... and they should stop to try to make new contents..... fix the game , and after you can add things.... The way it is right now is bad, new players just die because they are facing tanks with 5 crew skills and player with 90000 games . Because the matchmaking is not taking in consideration all the facts...... Could have like 0-1000 games , 1000-5000 games , 5000-20000, etc etc .
Off topic question - I saw on someone's video a couple of months ago that WG was going to allow one crew to be moved among perhaps three tanks without penalty. It doesn't look like that was part of the latest release. Do you have any information on that? Many thanks!
wg nerfd 279 and chief but forgot to nerf the unicoms that have this tanks ..what a dumb game, for the start of this game wg cant understand that the biggest unfair thing is they mixed players with huge PR difference , give a chief or a 279 to a tomato and automatedly the tank is balance , so simple .
The Chieften is better and more dangerous than the Obj 279 e. You penetrate Obj very easily. Plus the cannon before was very imprecise. Now it's sauerkraut. 🤮 Chieften is still very good while Obj takes the life of the player who plays it.
The Turtle 1 buff has only meant that you reach a position a bit earlier, you still get to meet tier 10, and you can still pretend to be a Tortoise against lower tiers
Yeah i agree +2 mm is dumb goodluck penning this with borat or prog frontaly.. but what does wg says? Flank heavly armor tonk? Yeah goodluck on the flank with corridor maps 😂😂
Players: we hate how the chief can sit hull down and farm for the entire game WG: we nurf the gun. all they needed to do it change the copular to the Tier 9 Chieftain P and the problem would be solved. since it no longer has a pixel shot weakspot, the gun only stops players from playing the tank not solving the issue at hand
Do you think the changes mean the chief coming back in one way or another? Like next cw campaign reward, set of missions like 279, bond store or trading caravan/auction event? I think the changes were made so people wouldn't be so outraged when they decide to make it obtainable again...
Not sure tbf, maybe they will put it back into rotation for the clan wars rewards. It wouldn't be for a new campaign mission like 279e though, that is for sure.
I can imagine some auction of assembly shop event where you need like 50K bonds and 100 million credits and other stuff like free xp and blueprints and gold to get it.
@@lanelesic they cant add it via assembly shop as the assembly shop tanks are a special kind of limited number tank which shouldnt be sold again except for maybe the black market i.e the obj 780 and lion never making an appearance in any shops since release. the chief should stay a reward as far as im concerned until they mayeb replace it with the mbt b and the chief being no longer available until they add it to the bond store which wouldnt be a great idea
Problem on these tanks not a single point its complete pack, if you got more armor than super-heavy armor u need to be slow, if you got no visible weakpoint u need to derpy gun, if you got stable gun you need slow traverse speeds, exc. for my perspective latest nerfs irrelevant.These are competitive-challenge tanks i get it but balancing is not that hard like obj. 260
99% of players don't care if you 1% have your pixel toys nerfed. Those things have been killing the game for years slowly. They also single handedly ruined clan wars. and ranked battles (until recent). The day WG properly adjusts pixel tanks like these will be a few months prior to going out of business. Only the owner of WG can be held responsible for his stupid business choices and provide answers as to "why" he has made the choices he has. It certainly wasn't out of any legal concern; you can't sue a video game developer for changing the stats of pixels that you're renting. you don't own them.
Tier 10 reward tanks that can take years of mission grinding to get should not be at the same level as other tier 10 tanks but much better or else why bother with the grind, where's the value? The obj279e is now for the most part is equal to the Maus in armor and pen values but will take you 2yrs of grinding to get unless you hire a boosting company. I don't have the 279e or the Chief and never will cause I suck at this game, but I disagree with nerfing these into normal tier 10's, too much work required to get them.
only the chief needed nerf, the 279e did not need any nerf..its not even OP after all those missions. Only those bad players complained cause they did not know the weakspots
There is only one OP tank left in this game: OBJ 279e. Because the game is made by Russians, Belarusians are still Russians! It's not worth putting money into this game. MM is a total embarrassment.
I think for pub games this nerf doesn't affect both tanks much because strong point of 279e has armor that is still strong to people who don't know how to pen it and chief is hull down potential if you don't relocate to a better position to flight probably have same problem just they will get into position slower than before, But for CAMPAIN this nerf affect so much (at least for my servers play style) sorry for my bad english
What is the problem? You can easily pen the 279e through the upper hull if you use your brain a bit. The super conq is harder to deal with than the 279e
IMO, if they just fixed MM from being "random", leveled the skill playing field, removed -2 matchmaking like u said, and didnt stack OP reward tanks on one side, things would be better off than just nerfing two tanks.
They have a patented match maker. It is literally designed to homogenize win rates. It literally punishes you for winning and playing well. It's all part of the skinner box / casino that is World of Tanks. The entire point is to speed up matches by putting in their own bots (just like Warthunder does) to help rig matches. WG likes 15-1 simulators because it milks you of consumables thus guiding you into premium tanks and premium accounts to stop the silver loss.
23:54 you can, it's a 50/50, I've penned several times with a T30 which also has 320 pen, your shots both went low, so it wasn't really the penetration that was the problem (on the first 2 shots), but the derpy gun, I'd say it's still an easier choice than trying to snipe the cupolas which are much smaller and harder to hit
I can understand all the nerfs except for the premium pen, now we'll just play 279 vs 279 and not pen each other, it's just stupid. Also most other Russian heavies and meds have 340 heat, why change that
Chief got hit harder cause it.s not russian;)279 is the same idiotproof...anyway this was a fake problem,they r not so comon in randoms.+many don.t shoot prem ammo because it.s cool;)
I think the biggest nerf of the 279e is the premium pen. It no longer can pen tanks such as jagpz E100's cheek, E100, Maus. Fucking T57 heavy is now orange
Not really, you only need roughly 295-300mm of pen to smack through the JgPzE100's superstructure, E 100 is roughly 310-325mm, on flat ground that's an easy pen Maus' turret face is still 260mm so that's an easy pen, and T57 is full green vs a 279e's "nerfed" gold pen. What you smoking?
@@pencilcase8068 I wouldn't have a 260, 279e, 907 and recently a vkk if it was skill issue. You can't deny that there's a big difference between 340 and 320 heat pen.
💬 *Discord:* maxgamingfps.com/discord
🎮 *Twitch:* twitch.tv/MaxGamingFPS
💵 *Patreon:* www.patreon.com/MaxGamingFPS
🌐 *Website:* maxgamingfps.com
When the enemy team get a 279E, and your team gets a BC25t, on Abbey, the nerfs don't seem to add up!
BC25t js good tho
This video has changed my life. I have how a girlfriend and 5000+ WN8. Thank you MaxGamingFPS
You are welcome, although what is this "Girlfriend" you speak of...
Have u taken ur meds maanke?
What means "Girlfriend"?
Still annoys me that WG named it the Object 279(e) when it should be named Object 726.
Also, one of the designs for the Object had it mount an E5-style machine gun turret/cupola, and I think it would have been interesting if they reworked the model to give it that cupola but stronger hull armor. Theoretically could have fixed the armor problems it has in Tier 10 games and Tier 8 games; stronger hull protects against premium rounds while cupola gives lower tiers a weak spot they can actually pen from the front.
the thing is, 726 was the name given to it because they further developed the 279 to a finished product. earlier it was called the 279 early. wg is not entirely wrong in calling it that plus they were thinking of adding by the 726 name back in supertest
Yeah, +/- 2 MM should not be a thing
I have a best nerf strategy...give it grille 15 gun 😅 you can't nerf it more than the xxxx gun tier 10 ever
i like to call the chief now a chief p with more alpha ever since i found the nerfs. The reload is identical and pen is almost identical now. only difference is now the smaller cupola
And the chief p is worse than phase 1 so that means chief only has more hp armor and speed because of the tier, decent nerfs but the 279 one wanst enough well at least if you dont have an jag in your team
@@joaoguilherme9034 the 279 couldve used a bigger mobility nerf, cause the thing is, a lot of things with 280+ pen will autopen them as soon as the 279 angles a slight bit. the thing is, many tanks in wot are only good against -2. so if wg decreased the traverse for example it would allow tier 8 tanks to outflank it and get its vulnerable side. like max said, the armor profile is fine, its only dumb when youre facing it head on as a tier 8.
If WoT got rid of +2 MM they would get more new players and retain more old players.
The problem with these two vehicles wasn't the shell penetration, it wasn't their health point pools, frankly it wasn't even their mobility. The armor is the issue for both of them:
T95/FV4201 needs a bigger cupola model
Object 279e needs weaker hull armor or a bigger cupola weak point.
I have not experienced any change whatsoever with these two vehicles, sure they're a tiny touch slower to get into position but the thing that makes them so OP wasn't touched at all. Chieftain is still a S-Tier hull-down beast that basically nothing shy of arty can do anything to, and the 279e still doesn't have a viable weak-spot on the front aside from loading up high heat pen tanks to hard counter it by slamming HEAT rounds at it nonstop.
Edit: Either touch the armor, or remove both tank's ability to see lower than tier 10. Tier IX pen is barely able to in most cases and tier 8 pen is not enough unless the Chief/279e player is dumb af and shows full rear!
nonsense, so we should remove ability to see low tiers for everything they cant pen? Like maus, pz7, is7, E100 etc and armor is just a part of the problem, you can nerf armor they still would be too strong because everything was too good
@@durachoks IS-7 has an underplate, Maus has 260mm turret cheeks, Pz VII has a side scrape weakspot and an underplate that is easy to exploit, E 100 has an underplate, flat sides and flat rear.
279e doesn't even have an lower glacis weak point, the cupolas are tiny and really only high skilled players or tier 10 players with big premium pen can deal with.
Regular tech tree tier 10s have weak points you can clearly see and exploit given your knowledge on how to get a good angle. 279e's weak points are only really exploitable when you have a gun with extremely decent-to-high penetration, of which 97% of tier 8 tanks do not possess,
The biggest reason why the 279e gets so much hate and is called OP is because against -2 tanks it's literally impossible to fight unless you can manage to get it's rear, which is not always an option.
Tier 10s at least have the option of firing high pen AP/APCR/HEAT that can just plow through the armor or at minimum give and advantage where lower tiers would have a 0% chance of damaging.
You can bring up any tier 10 tank and any tier 8 combination, outside of preferential premiums and I can tell you exactly how to counter it or at least get angles where you can reliably penetrate and deal with it, the 279e on the other hand, the best advice for anyone who isn't in a high penetration tank, is just to simply ran tf away and hope your team mates can deal with it. It's unfair to have -2 tiers fighting something they literally cannot beat unless the 279e player is a tard
@@K_LeShaeya lol I just want to see how you deal with Maus or Pz7 "weakspots" in your tier 8 tank xD also that easy to exploit is7 lower plate is almost 250mm, point is you cant do shit to those tanks, unless you get side, and same is true for 279e
"Skill Issue"@@durachoks
@@K_LeShaeya said prob average 52% gamer, who thinks he understands something xD
bro WG need to make it preferential match making
I still think better nerfs would be proper weakspots, but I'm also sure that changes in models are harder than just those numbers they touched - and they are fine imo too.
The only needed nerfs for those 2 tanks was really weekspots, Now they are kinda worse but still fucking toxic in certain scenarios as they were before
14:34: "If you nerf the gun handling even more...".
But they didn't touch its gun handling, dude. The only metric of the gun nerfed was RoF/dpm. Unless you consider that as part of "gun handling", which it is not. Chieftain has an excellent gun handling btw (0.14/0.14/0.11 dispersion factors + 0.35 base accuracy and 2.1 sec base aiming time).
Those 2 tanks should bd locked to T10 only.
Also should not be allowed to platoon & should have forced mirroring when in the random que.
A platoon of 3 chiefs vs all TT is just a auto loss & still happened yesterday on my server.
dont even need to limit the tier just limit the platoon number for reward tanks. if you lock them or mirror them the match maker is gonna take as long as war thunders
@nakirix2910 when those tanks regularly show up against t8 & only on 1 side on low pop servers, it's a nightmare. They definitely need tier locking
@@NakiriX1 Tier X tanks struggle to fight a good 279e player, and are forced to fire higher penetration HEAT/AP/APCR. Tier Xs have to do this it beat unless you can somehow manage to flank, Tier VIIIs have like same special ammo pen as TIER IX standard pens and you're saying they shouldn't be locked to Tier X only?!
Why isn't anyone talking about how broken these tanks are in CW? in the last CW, teams stacked with chiefs and 279e were dominating the games..... they seriously need to address this or at least reintroduce tank locking so that this cancer can be controlled!!
Add the blitz mechanic for normal ammo doing more damage and gun marks would be better..
+1/0 MM spread for premium/reward tanks and 0/-1 MM spread for regular/tanks and a whole lot of frustration would just vanish
I stopped playing WOT for the simple fact that the majority of the matches are just too unforgiving. If the MM kept matches to +0 and +1/-1, it would be more enjoyable. As those matches last longer, and you can actually play the game as intended. If its +2/-2, the matches just get overblown with the top tanks and good players yolo pushing the lowest tier tanks in the match. Not to mention tier 8 is super saturated with premium tanks that are downtiered tier 9 tanks...
I have maintained my position regarding +2/-2 as a bad idea. It should be +1/-1. Wargaming need to address clan wars desperately and have a mode somewhere between that and random battles that works.
I've played clan wars. The problem is lack of variety in tanks and it can easily turn into a full time job. Not to mention the amount of waiting around that can occur or multiple battles that happen at once which you can't fulfill.
Exactly, being -2 80% of the time in lower tiers makes it unbearable
If you were in the city with the Object instead of the Chieftain when the obj came and grille on you with the Obj 279e you were dead. And people cry about this tank 🫣🫣🫣
holy playing against 279 will be so much more toxic when the other 279 and chiefs cant pen it as easily.
They should not nerf but fix the matchmaking ... put same class and same tank with same number of skills ... number of field modification , same tier , close to same number of game with the tank in the matchmaking ... etc and you will start to see good game with normal time not a 2 min game with a score of 2-15 or 15-2 etc..... Wargaming does not care of how matchmaking works.... and dont mention.... well the pool of players etc ..... if you only have 10 tanks that match well do a 5 vs 5 .... just have a 15 max tanks match but no minimun ... You will stat to see game with 14-15, 15-14 with a 15 minutes time .... and they should stop to try to make new contents..... fix the game , and after you can add things.... The way it is right now is bad, new players just die because they are facing tanks with 5 crew skills and player with 90000 games . Because the matchmaking is not taking in consideration all the facts...... Could have like 0-1000 games , 1000-5000 games , 5000-20000, etc etc .
yes Nerfed 279e and Chieftain but where
is the buff for Maus and Type 5? this is weird
Off topic question - I saw on someone's video a couple of months ago that WG was going to allow one crew to be moved among perhaps three tanks without penalty. It doesn't look like that was part of the latest release. Do you have any information on that? Many thanks!
Nobody knows apart from WG
They nerfed other smaller tanks and TD's again as well!!!
what they did with the vz55 and vz 51 guns this tanks are unplayable now and some ccs keeps crying to wg to nerf every tech tree tank
wg nerfd 279 and chief but forgot to nerf the unicoms that have this tanks ..what a dumb game, for the start of this game wg cant understand that the biggest unfair thing is they mixed players with huge PR difference , give a chief or a 279 to a tomato and automatedly the tank is balance , so simple .
279 real speed like in real world not in wot faery world is 55 km/h
11:50 Max discover entire tank division marching toward him
They nerfed the magical Russian 4 tracks tank ? Good thing i didn't waste time and mental health trying to get it 😂
The Chieften is better and more dangerous than the Obj 279 e. You penetrate Obj very easily. Plus the cannon before was very imprecise. Now it's sauerkraut. 🤮
Chieften is still very good while Obj takes the life of the player who plays it.
the nerfs are pure comedy. Typical wg nonsense.
The Turtle 1 buff has only meant that you reach a position a bit earlier, you still get to meet tier 10, and you can still pretend to be a Tortoise against lower tiers
Chief should be nerfed but 279e not so. Only what need to be done is all tier X plays against Tier X
279 is shit, if you don't get a hill to get up its just shit, 260 is gold tank and easy to get
Yeah i agree +2 mm is dumb goodluck penning this with borat or prog frontaly.. but what does wg says? Flank heavly armor tonk? Yeah goodluck on the flank with corridor maps 😂😂
Good they got nerfed
ok
lately, i've seen quite a lot of Chieftain and 279e players really underperforming, like sometimes barely 2k damage and first to die
A lot of good players wont play those tanks anymore, so all thats left are mediocre and bad players, and bad player is a bad player whatever he drives
more and more boosted accounts,now i got boosting company invitation with every log in
Noice
Players: we hate how the chief can sit hull down and farm for the entire game
WG: we nurf the gun.
all they needed to do it change the copular to the Tier 9 Chieftain P and the problem would be solved. since it no longer has a pixel shot weakspot, the gun only stops players from playing the tank not solving the issue at hand
Do you think the changes mean the chief coming back in one way or another? Like next cw campaign reward, set of missions like 279, bond store or trading caravan/auction event? I think the changes were made so people wouldn't be so outraged when they decide to make it obtainable again...
Not sure tbf, maybe they will put it back into rotation for the clan wars rewards. It wouldn't be for a new campaign mission like 279e though, that is for sure.
I can imagine some auction of assembly shop event where you need like 50K bonds and 100 million credits and other stuff like free xp and blueprints and gold to get it.
@@lanelesic they cant add it via assembly shop as the assembly shop tanks are a special kind of limited number tank which shouldnt be sold again except for maybe the black market i.e the obj 780 and lion never making an appearance in any shops since release. the chief should stay a reward as far as im concerned until they mayeb replace it with the mbt b and the chief being no longer available until they add it to the bond store which wouldnt be a great idea
Next bond store update this year
I believe there was a leak that they wanted to make it a regular reward like the other reward tanks for CW
Problem on these tanks not a single point its complete pack, if you got more armor than super-heavy armor u need to be slow, if you got no visible weakpoint u need to derpy gun, if you got stable gun you need slow traverse speeds, exc. for my perspective latest nerfs irrelevant.These are competitive-challenge tanks i get it but balancing is not that hard like obj. 260
99% of players don't care if you 1% have your pixel toys nerfed. Those things have been killing the game for years slowly. They also single handedly ruined clan wars. and ranked battles (until recent).
The day WG properly adjusts pixel tanks like these will be a few months prior to going out of business. Only the owner of WG can be held responsible for his stupid business choices and provide answers as to "why" he has made the choices he has. It certainly wasn't out of any legal concern; you can't sue a video game developer for changing the stats of pixels that you're renting. you don't own them.
Tier 10 reward tanks that can take years of mission grinding to get should not be at the same level as other tier 10 tanks but much better or else why bother with the grind, where's the value? The obj279e is now for the most part is equal to the Maus in armor and pen values but will take you 2yrs of grinding to get unless you hire a boosting company. I don't have the 279e or the Chief and never will cause I suck at this game, but I disagree with nerfing these into normal tier 10's, too much work required to get them.
only the chief needed nerf, the 279e did not need any nerf..its not even OP after all those missions.
Only those bad players complained cause they did not know the weakspots
There is only one OP tank left in this game: OBJ 279e. Because the game is made by Russians, Belarusians are still Russians! It's not worth putting money into this game. MM is a total embarrassment.
279 e is just worse is 4
279 is also strong vs tier x if you dont spam gold
I think for pub games this nerf doesn't affect both tanks much because strong point of 279e has armor that is still strong to people who don't know how to pen it and chief is hull down potential if you don't relocate to a better position to flight probably have same problem just they will get into position slower than before, But for CAMPAIN this nerf affect so much (at least for my servers play style) sorry for my bad english
What is the problem? You can easily pen the 279e through the upper hull if you use your brain a bit. The super conq is harder to deal with than the 279e
IMO, if they just fixed MM from being "random", leveled the skill playing field, removed -2 matchmaking like u said, and didnt stack OP reward tanks on one side, things would be better off than just nerfing two tanks.
They can.t buddy.anyway grinding is way too easy;)
@@sorinancuta3934 Incompetence or unwilling?
@@DustinSilva i doubt that a creator of a game is incompetent;)don.t be so naive.
@@sorinancuta3934 so why "cant" they do it then?
They have a patented match maker. It is literally designed to homogenize win rates. It literally punishes you for winning and playing well. It's all part of the skinner box / casino that is World of Tanks. The entire point is to speed up matches by putting in their own bots (just like Warthunder does) to help rig matches. WG likes 15-1 simulators because it milks you of consumables thus guiding you into premium tanks and premium accounts to stop the silver loss.
23:54 you can, it's a 50/50, I've penned several times with a T30 which also has 320 pen, your shots both went low, so it wasn't really the penetration that was the problem (on the first 2 shots), but the derpy gun, I'd say it's still an easier choice than trying to snipe the cupolas which are much smaller and harder to hit
Its not even 50/50, he was higher thats his enemy, Its almost 100% pen chance in this situation
W video
I can understand all the nerfs except for the premium pen, now we'll just play 279 vs 279 and not pen each other, it's just stupid. Also most other Russian heavies and meds have 340 heat, why change that
Or just stop cupola sniping.
320 is gonna pen 279 e’s ask kpz 07 pe players
Because they didn.t want to touch the armor;)
Vz.55 now please Max :D
Chief got hit harder cause it.s not russian;)279 is the same idiotproof...anyway this was a fake problem,they r not so comon in randoms.+many don.t shoot prem ammo because it.s cool;)
chief and 279 are idiotproof? I guess i did not ever play those tanks
I think the biggest nerf of the 279e is the premium pen. It no longer can pen tanks such as jagpz E100's cheek, E100, Maus. Fucking T57 heavy is now orange
Not really, you only need roughly 295-300mm of pen to smack through the JgPzE100's superstructure, E 100 is roughly 310-325mm, on flat ground that's an easy pen Maus' turret face is still 260mm so that's an easy pen, and T57 is full green vs a 279e's "nerfed" gold pen.
What you smoking?
Sounds like a skill issue, people pen the tanks you're crying about in IS7s with 300mm apcr
@@pencilcase8068 I wouldn't have a 260, 279e, 907 and recently a vkk if it was skill issue. You can't deny that there's a big difference between 340 and 320 heat pen.
@@MFFK_AEK laughs in boosting company
@@pencilcase8068 imagine paying thousands of euros for pixels