All provinces of every country become 1 trade good, i.e. holland and the other dutch could become spice, mali becomes gold, bohemia turns into crystal, muscovy becomes like grain, novogorod becomes fur and soo on, or do it randomly or set a few countries to be something specific, but randomize the others
I think whats happening is that the countries are seizing estates while below 50 loyalty. The AI always does this and it isn't usually a problem, but here with all the provinces so far apart, rebels can spawn anywhere. Also, when they seize land, loyalty goes below 30 for all the estates, and thats adds 3~6 global unrest.
Great Video, here’s and idea for one of the next ones: Can you make a video where every dynasty is a country? So a country getting a regency or something like will get auto-inherited even if they are non-christian or republics. (Please)
De Austria is Spanish for Habsburg. That's why the Spanish princesses who married French kings were named da Austria although they were in fact from Spain. For instance, three musketeers are in the service of kings Louis XIII wife, Anne of Austria.
Idk how to mod but You should change the trade goods by region. So like make the entire Poland region wheat, Anatolia salt, ect ect. so the countries stay together normally. But have different stats like you showed here
it would be cool if every province of those countries was ALWAYS the appropriate trade good, for example if QQ conquers a province, that provice becomes wool, etc
Hey hey I'm strongly against nuclear energy. Not just because of the potential dangers of Chernobyl like disasters but also because we have wat better alternatives. Actual green energy like wind, solar and water energy should be subsidized and expanded into oblivion. You said your a physicist so you may have a answer to that question: what happens to the nuclear waste? I have never seen a actual answer to that. Doesn't the nuclear waste stay poisonis for over a thousand years? Where could we store it with the 100% certainty that it won't harm anyone? And don't atomic plants need a ungodly amount of cooling? Again I'm not a expert by any means but I read about rivers in France going dry because they where used as cooling devices? I'm not a anti-nuclear hardliner by any means I'm really open to change my mind but for all that I know nuclear energy seems like a unnecessary dangerous source of energy when we have completely safe technology at hand. I wouldn't stop any nuclear power plants at the moment as we are in the middle of a energy crisis but I definitely wouldn't expand them either. You may have the expertise to change my mind on that tho. Would love a response. Have a wonderful day my friend.
@@derdude6214 First, let me address your concerns about nuclear waste. Nuclear waste is a significant problem associated with nuclear energy production. But, it's not to say that all forms of energy production generate waste. For example, solar panels require toxic chemicals during their manufacturing process, and wind turbines require large amounts of rare earth metals. When it comes to nuclear waste, there are several options for disposal. One of the most common methods is to store it deep underground in geologically stable formations. This is already being done in several countries, including Sweden, Finland, and France. Additionally, advanced nuclear reactors, such as molten salt reactors, can use nuclear waste as fuel, which reduces the amount of waste that needs to be stored. Now, regarding the issue of cooling, it is true that nuclear power plants require a lot of water for cooling. However, this is not unique to nuclear plants. All thermal power plants, including those that burn fossil fuels, require cooling water. There are, however, several advanced nuclear reactor designs that do not require water for cooling, such as the aforementioned molten salt reactors. Finally, let's consider the benefits of nuclear energy. Nuclear power plants produce large amounts of electricity with zero greenhouse gas emissions. This makes them a great option for combating climate change. Additionally, nuclear power is a reliable source of energy that can provide baseload power, meaning it can supply electricity 24/7, unlike some renewable energy sources that are intermittent. In conclusion, while nuclear energy does have its challenges, it's important to consider it as part of a mix of energy sources needed to meet growing energy demand while reducing greenhouse gas emissions. While yes we have seen some terrible tragedies due to nuclear reactors, but those are usually attributed to low quality reactors and human errors, or in some other case very unfortunate series of events, this is not to say that nuclear energy is the ultimate solution for all, its to say that maybe if we put more effort into researching it we might find an actually clean and powerful energy source
@@inyourwalls-q6p Thank you for the explanation! I do still believe that natural sources of energy should be a priority but Nuclear does seem to be the better in between technology compared to gas or fossil fuels. The waste and cooling do however still put me off. Solar panels and Wind turbines do need a lot of rare and also dangerous material to be produced but Nuclear power plants seem to produce toxic waste non stop. Dont the storing facilities get pushed to their limit at one point? I think wants there is a actual solution that reduces the toxic waste to such a degree that it's basically not even a matter of issue anymore then Nuclear should be considered as a long term energy supply. The cooling is unfortunate but you made fair point as the other energy gaining methods we currently use during the process of decarbonization do require a similar amount but are even less green in return. So thank you again for your comment, I really appreciate it. I hope we continue the research on all kinds of power plants so thar we can diversify the economic landscape of that sector to stay secure at any given moment. Have a wonderful week my friend.👍
@@derdude6214 Comparing nuclear energy to green energy is not necessary. They can supplement each other. What you need to compare, is what Germany did. Coal and especially brown coal versus nuclear energy. Because Germany closed their nuclear reactors in favor of (brown) coal. Also in Belgium they are thinking about closing nuclear reactor and going for gas reactor instead. Can you tell me, as an environmentalist, whether you prefer (brown) coal or nuclear energy?
@@Rhand007 You're definitely right that's what I wrote in my second comment aswell but I think green energy should still be the log term goal. I think it was a mistake to close down the nuclear power plants whilst relying on fossil sources but I do think that neither should be the final solution.
5:32 - would've probably also needed to make it so that seizing land from estates didn't pop rebels or cause more unrest, but that's not usually what one thinks of lmao.
Spice should have gone to any country on the Malabar coast because that area is called the spice garden of India and produces like 70 % of spice . And cotton should have also been an Indian state because cotton was first used in India and India is still the largest producer of cotton .
Heaven't finished watching it, but the inflation from owning every gold province in EU4 must be insane. I think Spain has some Missions and things that reduce it, but still.
Can you do this on an uncolonized World where the Nations have a 100% chance of only getting their trade good in the colony Would love to see how that would play out
"Who else would get the Gold" Mali, the country literally known for having a King that was so rich - that he crashed the entire economy of three continents
Chewy’s comment about atomic energy makes him even more handsome a man to me. And I am German. Unfortunately the government of Germany is quite incompetent at the time. It is as Jordan Peterson rightly said: we Germans live in a kakocracy.
@@Chewbert👍 Same here, I love the USA and the Americans, but your government not so much at the moment. I hope that things will lock up for both our countries in the future.
I agree with that nuclear energy point. This is what both environmentalists and contrarians agree with, nuclear is the future of sustainable energy, both economically and environmentally.
German here. I'm also not a fan of what my goverment did. Like in so many cases the loudmouths screamed and the goverment bent it's knees. Also, as certified electrician I have a much better insight in how this effects our nation, the consumer and nature.
(TLDR: nuclear energy is complicated and should be part of the solution but just shouldn't/can't be the whole solution) The issue of Nuclear energy is an interesting one. I would first like to say I am not anti-nuclear energy, i think it should definitely be part of the solution but there is alot more nuance to Nuclear energy than it simply being "Clean". First off nuclear energy is WAY safer than coal/natural gas/and oil. Even the biggest disasters that have happened nuclear wise are less deadly than the biggest disasters at coal facilities. Coal ash is as or more carcinogenic as the aerosol nuclear waste that spread across the globe from Chernobyl, and while Chernobyl and Fukushima, were HUGE tragedies, there have been similar in scale events that have happened at coal facilities, particularly in the storage of coal ash, one such event which name I can't rember right no was just as deadly and just as enviromentally damaging. Next though I want to talk about energy potential. There is only something like 400 terawatt years of nuclear energy available on earth (again a little rough on exact estimates). Now let me be clear this does not mean that we will run out of uranium in 400 years, the half life of some uranium isotopes would allow for essentially infinite energy in the eyes of people (ie. it will last probably longer than human will last). but it does mean that if we were some how able to access and use all of the potentially fision based isotopes available on our planet we would only be able to generate 400 terawatt years of energy. The bigger issue would be actually getting to a point where we are generating that much energy at a given time. (this here is a topic with much debate and is increadibly hard to talk about in a youtube comment, but basically nuclear energy could power the earth, but actually doing it is kinda impossible) Finally i want to address storing spent nuclear waste. Current laws dictate that waste be stored in a facility in such a way that should people find it something like 1 million years in the future (again I am sorry exact numbers are not my specialty), they would know not to enter or mess with the waste of the facility, in every possible future. Which if you think about it how can you make a universal message that both lasts for millions of years and anybody no matter the culture or language or knowledge in the future would know that it is dangerous and that you shouldn't enter the facility... sigh um yeah so like I like nuclear energy but reducing energy consumption on a whole, mixed with better harnessing wind and solar should in my mind take precedence. (Also one can always hope for fusion reactors! Dem would be cool)
This is like if monopolist megacorps existed in 1444, answer, Cloth Co defeats them all. What else are you going to do with all your grain with a cloth bag?
Can we get this, but with the expanded trade goods mod? would increase the border gore at the start sure, but the extra trade goods would give us more chaos and bonuses to play around with.
Two ideas - delete the HRE in Europe but give its mechanics to Ming and its tributaries. Second idea - give Austria the Mandate of Heaven (and change the provinces that give effects to ones in Europe).
If you really wanted to compere goods then you should not only unify the religion of a tag, but also the culture. And picking grain for Poland is the best choice because "Polska" basically means "Land of the People from Fields". :D
German Nuclear had been replaced by Wind and Solar. Coal is almost stable. Replacing nuclear with wind and solar is stupid thing to do but not stupid as coal replacing nuclear.
I think keeping cores was a great idea for this run. What about starting a game with the US owning every province (like they do irl) with no gov cap bonus and seeing how the game goes.
Day 48 of asking for everyone is Dutch, because Netherland receiving cloth. Are you sure? Where did the spices go? Just asking for a friend. That friend might be the VOC and they will be knocking on your door in 3, 2, 1......
@@Chewbert didn’t expect a response, was good. Perhaps would of liked a bit more depth but I do like the concept. I just thought the 4000 like hitting a small child thing was funny.
You could've gave coffee to the people who invented making a drink out of it (ethiopians) but you gave it to the people who made it popular (arabians) Also gold should've been Mali but they start with a crisis so Spain it is.
![What If Byzantium ESCAPED? [EU4]](/img/n.gif)
All provinces of every country become 1 trade good, i.e. holland and the other dutch could become spice, mali becomes gold, bohemia turns into crystal, muscovy becomes like grain, novogorod becomes fur and soo on, or do it randomly or set a few countries to be something specific, but randomize the others
"And of course we had to give all of the gold to Spain because who else would get it?"
Mansa Musa - "How dare you Sir. Good day, I said good day sir"
Me when Eu4 players are being euro centric:
Mali should get salt for exactly that reason, you know, the thing that made him rich.
Mali definitely should have had either salt or gold.
Mail sucks ass in EU4 and dies early because if it’s disaster
@@legitplayin6977 players of a Eurocentric game are Eurocentric? Who would’ve thought
Idea: every country has cores on all of the world
already posted that idea for him
@@gamgamesplayer4506you are first😎
And aggressive expansion is turned off
Scenario: The new world is extremly scary with far more powerful nations then in Europe.
Sun set invasion
Alternative: move every country in Europe to the new world and leave Europe uncolonized
Base game
He already did a tech 32 natives video
@@gamgamesplayer4506 bro it was only like 5 nations that got tech
I think whats happening is that the countries are seizing estates while below 50 loyalty. The AI always does this and it isn't usually a problem, but here with all the provinces so far apart, rebels can spawn anywhere.
Also, when they seize land, loyalty goes below 30 for all the estates, and thats adds 3~6 global unrest.
I think rebels were so successful because getting mil access to get to provinces with rebels was impossible
Idea: Every Nation Is in a difrent Spot. Example:
France swaps to scotland, scotland tp poland, poland to the ottomans, etc etc.
"Of course we gave all gold to Spain because who else would get it"
Golden Horde?
Mali?
Inca?
Chewy being a pro nuclear energy is unexpectedly based
Not giving TEA to Brittain is bound to angry one british chap that would make the TEA op broken
tea is not british, they took it from china
Great Video, here’s and idea for one of the next ones:
Can you make a video where every dynasty is a country? So a country getting a regency or something like will get auto-inherited even if they are non-christian or republics. (Please)
COME ON MAN, YOU MISSED A PERFECT JOKE!
Wool=Wales🏴🐏🏴🐏🏴
I would have said coal, but this has *depth*
@@jeanpal295 just like those poor, poor sheep.
@@toasterofdoom9629 3 inches isn't very deep. But it is big, I can tell you that. It's waaay above average
De Austria is Spanish for Habsburg. That's why the Spanish princesses who married French kings were named da Austria although they were in fact from Spain. For instance, three musketeers are in the service of kings Louis XIII wife, Anne of Austria.
Chewbert being pro nuclear is a grace upon humanity
It’s a shame more people aren’t :(
Scenario: every trade node is a country
Idk how to mod but
You should change the trade goods by region. So like make the entire Poland region wheat, Anatolia salt, ect ect. so the countries stay together normally. But have different stats like you showed here
modding pdx games is super easy lmao
@@australiananarchist480 do I seem smart enough to even mod Minecraft? 😂
@@zook7104 no dude, its seriously piss easy. youll just need to find a text file somewhere, and change "wheat" to "salt" or whatever.
0:30 slavery
it would be cool if every province of those countries was ALWAYS the appropriate trade good, for example if QQ conquers a province, that provice becomes wool, etc
Already liked for the Nuclear energy plug. As a staunch environmentalist and a physicist by trade the lack of Nuclear Energy really really annoys me.
Hey hey I'm strongly against nuclear energy. Not just because of the potential dangers of Chernobyl like disasters but also because we have wat better alternatives. Actual green energy like wind, solar and water energy should be subsidized and expanded into oblivion.
You said your a physicist so you may have a answer to that question: what happens to the nuclear waste? I have never seen a actual answer to that. Doesn't the nuclear waste stay poisonis for over a thousand years? Where could we store it with the 100% certainty that it won't harm anyone?
And don't atomic plants need a ungodly amount of cooling? Again I'm not a expert by any means but I read about rivers in France going dry because they where used as cooling devices?
I'm not a anti-nuclear hardliner by any means I'm really open to change my mind but for all that I know nuclear energy seems like a unnecessary dangerous source of energy when we have completely safe technology at hand.
I wouldn't stop any nuclear power plants at the moment as we are in the middle of a energy crisis but I definitely wouldn't expand them either. You may have the expertise to change my mind on that tho.
Would love a response.
Have a wonderful day my friend.
@@derdude6214 First, let me address your concerns about nuclear waste. Nuclear waste is a significant problem associated with nuclear energy production. But, it's not to say that all forms of energy production generate waste. For example, solar panels require toxic chemicals during their manufacturing process, and wind turbines require large amounts of rare earth metals.
When it comes to nuclear waste, there are several options for disposal. One of the most common methods is to store it deep underground in geologically stable formations. This is already being done in several countries, including Sweden, Finland, and France. Additionally, advanced nuclear reactors, such as molten salt reactors, can use nuclear waste as fuel, which reduces the amount of waste that needs to be stored.
Now, regarding the issue of cooling, it is true that nuclear power plants require a lot of water for cooling. However, this is not unique to nuclear plants. All thermal power plants, including those that burn fossil fuels, require cooling water. There are, however, several advanced nuclear reactor designs that do not require water for cooling, such as the aforementioned molten salt reactors.
Finally, let's consider the benefits of nuclear energy. Nuclear power plants produce large amounts of electricity with zero greenhouse gas emissions. This makes them a great option for combating climate change. Additionally, nuclear power is a reliable source of energy that can provide baseload power, meaning it can supply electricity 24/7, unlike some renewable energy sources that are intermittent.
In conclusion, while nuclear energy does have its challenges, it's important to consider it as part of a mix of energy sources needed to meet growing energy demand while reducing greenhouse gas emissions. While yes we have seen some terrible tragedies due to nuclear reactors, but those are usually attributed to low quality reactors and human errors, or in some other case very unfortunate series of events, this is not to say that nuclear energy is the ultimate solution for all, its to say that maybe if we put more effort into researching it we might find an actually clean and powerful energy source
@@inyourwalls-q6p Thank you for the explanation! I do still believe that natural sources of energy should be a priority but Nuclear does seem to be the better in between technology compared to gas or fossil fuels.
The waste and cooling do however still put me off. Solar panels and Wind turbines do need a lot of rare and also dangerous material to be produced but Nuclear power plants seem to produce toxic waste non stop. Dont the storing facilities get pushed to their limit at one point? I think wants there is a actual solution that reduces the toxic waste to such a degree that it's basically not even a matter of issue anymore then Nuclear should be considered as a long term energy supply.
The cooling is unfortunate but you made fair point as the other energy gaining methods we currently use during the process of decarbonization do require a similar amount but are even less green in return.
So thank you again for your comment, I really appreciate it. I hope we continue the research on all kinds of power plants so thar we can diversify the economic landscape of that sector to stay secure at any given moment.
Have a wonderful week my friend.👍
@@derdude6214 Comparing nuclear energy to green energy is not necessary. They can supplement each other. What you need to compare, is what Germany did. Coal and especially brown coal versus nuclear energy. Because Germany closed their nuclear reactors in favor of (brown) coal. Also in Belgium they are thinking about closing nuclear reactor and going for gas reactor instead. Can you tell me, as an environmentalist, whether you prefer (brown) coal or nuclear energy?
@@Rhand007 You're definitely right that's what I wrote in my second comment aswell but I think green energy should still be the log term goal. I think it was a mistake to close down the nuclear power plants whilst relying on fossil sources but I do think that neither should be the final solution.
Like this video! We want to see chewbert fight a small child
13:00 RESERGIMEMTO!!! 13:50 cursed Catholic Arabia. 14:16 Even more cursed. 15:20 Flemish (basically Dutch) vs Waloon (Basically french)... Bloody Belgium.
Me and the boys commenting to boost this video in the UA-cam algorithm.
Doing God's work
Preach about nuclear sir, preach!
to answer the question of the day...
Cloves or spices, obviously, I am Dutch
2:50 the mamlukes be like: "Ne he hee it is I the great papyrus."
I like how based you are Chewbert! Stay real. Love from Norway
Would have went for changing all the cultures as well so that there arent as much rebel issues, but ig its fine
*"i want an apology"*
-------Kyle
I actually like those rebels and stability problems because it make a lot of random nations appear
5:32 - would've probably also needed to make it so that seizing land from estates didn't pop rebels or cause more unrest, but that's not usually what one thinks of lmao.
There's actually a really good video by Johhny Harris and Cleo Abram about the nuclear power plants as u stated at the start. Also nice video.
Nice to know you're a sane human being and prefer safe and stable energy sources over unreliable alternatives
Kinda wild that people will protest fossil fuel usage but also oppose nuclear power 😂
Fun Fact: Maximillian Von Habsburg was the Archduke of Austria and served as the Emperor of Mexico from 1864-1867
Overall I think copper is my favourite trade good. It is just such a strong early game good with lots of value when it matters most, early game.
it’s why i love russia and sweden’s eco so much, split fur/copper is kinda perfect for the early-midgame when it matters most
Spice should have gone to any country on the Malabar coast because that area is called the spice garden of India and produces like 70 % of spice . And cotton should have also been an Indian state because cotton was first used in India and India is still the largest producer of cotton .
Scenario: World full of Pirate Republics, which Sea Dog will survive?
Heaven't finished watching it, but the inflation from owning every gold province in EU4 must be insane. I think Spain has some Missions and things that reduce it, but still.
my favorite trade good has to be cloth. Expensive and gives dev cost reduction
NO WAY IT WON
Can you do this on an uncolonized World where the Nations have a 100% chance of only getting their trade good in the colony Would love to see how that would play out
my request was answered
thank you
and of course based chewbert at 1:07
The odd empires mod is a beautiful mod that would be interesting as a video
"Who else would get the Gold"
Mali, the country literally known for having a King that was so rich - that he crashed the entire economy of three continents
Why did you not give salt To Tunis? Carthage was famously salted it would have been perfect
May I suggest a what if Russian Alaska existed in 1444?
Chewy’s comment about atomic energy makes him even more handsome a man to me. And I am German. Unfortunately the government of Germany is quite incompetent at the time. It is as Jordan Peterson rightly said: we Germans live in a kakocracy.
I love Germans, but I dislike your government. Same with my own country 😂
@@Chewbert👍 Same here, I love the USA and the Americans, but your government not so much at the moment. I hope that things will lock up for both our countries in the future.
@@benwest2112 ditto man, wishing you all the best
@@Chewbert Thank you, same to you!
Respect for the Nuclear Energy shoutout
I agree with that nuclear energy point. This is what both environmentalists and contrarians agree with, nuclear is the future of sustainable energy, both economically and environmentally.
wine goes to the French ofc
*Italian overheating noises*
Liked because nuclear is literally the power source of the future.
German here. I'm also not a fan of what my goverment did. Like in so many cases the loudmouths screamed and the goverment bent it's knees.
Also, as certified electrician I have a much better insight in how this effects our nation, the consumer and nature.
The squeaky wheel gets the grease, as we say
Should do one where each region is one trade good, which I imagine would need some repeats but subcontinents would be too few.
Scenario: what if every province was fields
(TLDR: nuclear energy is complicated and should be part of the solution but just shouldn't/can't be the whole solution)
The issue of Nuclear energy is an interesting one.
I would first like to say I am not anti-nuclear energy, i think it should definitely be part of the solution but there is alot more nuance to Nuclear energy than it simply being "Clean".
First off nuclear energy is WAY safer than coal/natural gas/and oil. Even the biggest disasters that have happened nuclear wise are less deadly than the biggest disasters at coal facilities. Coal ash is as or more carcinogenic as the aerosol nuclear waste that spread across the globe from Chernobyl, and while Chernobyl and Fukushima, were HUGE tragedies, there have been similar in scale events that have happened at coal facilities, particularly in the storage of coal ash, one such event which name I can't rember right no was just as deadly and just as enviromentally damaging.
Next though I want to talk about energy potential. There is only something like 400 terawatt years of nuclear energy available on earth (again a little rough on exact estimates). Now let me be clear this does not mean that we will run out of uranium in 400 years, the half life of some uranium isotopes would allow for essentially infinite energy in the eyes of people (ie. it will last probably longer than human will last). but it does mean that if we were some how able to access and use all of the potentially fision based isotopes available on our planet we would only be able to generate 400 terawatt years of energy. The bigger issue would be actually getting to a point where we are generating that much energy at a given time. (this here is a topic with much debate and is increadibly hard to talk about in a youtube comment, but basically nuclear energy could power the earth, but actually doing it is kinda impossible)
Finally i want to address storing spent nuclear waste. Current laws dictate that waste be stored in a facility in such a way that should people find it something like 1 million years in the future (again I am sorry exact numbers are not my specialty), they would know not to enter or mess with the waste of the facility, in every possible future. Which if you think about it how can you make a universal message that both lasts for millions of years and anybody no matter the culture or language or knowledge in the future would know that it is dangerous and that you shouldn't enter the facility... sigh
um yeah so like I like nuclear energy but reducing energy consumption on a whole, mixed with better harnessing wind and solar should in my mind take precedence. (Also one can always hope for fusion reactors! Dem would be cool)
I agree wholeheartedly.
This is like if monopolist megacorps existed in 1444, answer, Cloth Co defeats them all. What else are you going to do with all your grain with a cloth bag?
Modern borders in old world like turkey borders go to Ottomans, india to bharat, pakistan to Mughals
The fact that GB didn't get all the tee provinces is a grave insult to all british people.
Good choice
Can we get this, but with the expanded trade goods mod? would increase the border gore at the start sure, but the extra trade goods would give us more chaos and bonuses to play around with.
It’s something I would consider for sure
“Especially since they shut down their nuclear power plants for… reasons”
My man has obviously never heard of Fukushima, Chernobyl, or nuclear waste
Casually mentions nuclear incidents that’s happened 30-40 years ago as if technology hasn’t advanced since then 😂
Ignorance is bliss
Favorite trade good: Ivory. Love the plus 2 Diplo Rep.
eu4: but every dev province is a nation (nation of all 3dev provinces, nation of all 4dev provinces etc.)
I like tea because the map colour on the trade goods map is cool
And also its tea, tea is cool
10:55 I just love the culture gore of these new world nations😂😂😂
He really did Kyle dirty 😂
To have brazilians mostly in Argentina makes for a truly cursed timeline
YES on the Nuclear
Two ideas - delete the HRE in Europe but give its mechanics to Ming and its tributaries. Second idea - give Austria the Mandate of Heaven (and change the provinces that give effects to ones in Europe).
"Who else would get all the gold?"
Um, Mali?
If you really wanted to compere goods then you should not only unify the religion of a tag, but also the culture. And picking grain for Poland is the best choice because "Polska" basically means "Land of the People from Fields". :D
1:14 Not for that one dude who died
I would love to see this save continue in ck3
German Nuclear had been replaced by Wind and Solar. Coal is almost stable.
Replacing nuclear with wind and solar is stupid thing to do but not stupid as coal replacing nuclear.
They could've just built that wind and solar without getting rid of nuclear. Coal effectively replaced nuclear
I think keeping cores was a great idea for this run. What about starting a game with the US owning every province (like they do irl) with no gov cap bonus and seeing how the game goes.
I hope you are joking
My favorite vacation spot is US owned Kabul
Where are my Russian orthodox brothers? Fur to Canada? Com'on...
Chewbert my friend I'm with you bring out the Atompunk!
Have you considered going back to old videos and remaking them with the updates to eu4
I would if there’s been relevant changes!
idea : Eu4 but every nation has cores on all the planet
This video has 3.5k Likes and if it gets 4k likes, Chewbert is legally obligated to fight a small child 3:06
I eagerly await to Chewbert's loss
Lore of EU4 but TRADE GOODS determine your COUNTRY? Momentum 100
EU4 but I beat up a small child sounds like a great concept for a video
Give all provinces with wonders in them to the papacy and (holy) see how that turns out
Thank you for the shoutout for nuclear energy, I'll never understand the modern hatred for it!
Because government told me nuclear bad! 😂
I think it would've been better to change the culture of the provinces as well, not only religion
A like just for the sheer work and time that making this video specifically can take.
Should’ve installed a mod that turns the USA into the CSA for funny reasons
German nuclear plants are sadly quite old. They should have invested in new plants 10-15 years ago
Day 48 of asking for everyone is Dutch, because Netherland receiving cloth. Are you sure? Where did the spices go? Just asking for a friend. That friend might be the VOC and they will be knocking on your door in 3, 2, 1......
As a German i am really displeased that coal went to Great Britain. We love our good old sustainable coal!
cloth is S as well.
it gives dev cost reduction
Eu 4 but everyone has permament +20 Unrest and +50% stability cost
Dang, that Mexico had nice borders.
Fun idea
What if devastation didn’t go down
Missed opportunity to give cotton to Kandy. Everyone loves some cotton Kandy
Fight the child!!
No one going to talk about the 4000 likes thing? Lol
Did you like the video or nah?
@@Chewbert didn’t expect a response, was good. Perhaps would of liked a bit more depth but I do like the concept. I just thought the 4000 like hitting a small child thing was funny.
You could've gave coffee to the people who invented making a drink out of it (ethiopians) but you gave it to the people who made it popular (arabians)
Also gold should've been Mali but they start with a crisis so Spain it is.
Cuban cigars are currently still prohibited in the US
Currently “still” you mean “again” lol
@@Chewbert i guess i’m bad at english smh
Eu4 but coalitions unite into one country
Based respect the nuclear power
Alright chewy time to square up with that small child💀
I am sure the canadian dictatorship joke would have nothing to do with the current regime
Oh no no very popular and ruling with great grace!