Will this train cost the Alaskan pollock industry $350 million?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 13 тра 2024
  • The train ride taken by Alaskan pollock at Kloosterboer's Bayside facility.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 17

  • @Chrnan6710
    @Chrnan6710 Рік тому +8

    Hysterical. Gonna be so sad to see this freak of nature go if the lawsuits end up that way :(

  • @mbfanz
    @mbfanz Рік тому +20

    The Drive brought me here lol

  • @steve66oh
    @steve66oh Рік тому +2

    I bought a 10 meter boat from Uncle Sam at a government auction. The boat was built in Norway for the U.S. Navy.
    Under Jones Act, to use this boat in "coastwise trade" (say.. a dive charter boat..), it must be U.S. built. There are exceptions though.. foreign-builds which are captured as war prize or seized/forfeit for smuggling or other lawbreaking... and then sold from U.S. federal custody at auction, qualify for these exceptions. My boat (like those..) was sold from Federal possession.. but mine LACKS THE CRIMINAL HISTORY necessary to qualify her for the exceptions which would make her eligible for coastwise trade.
    Instead of smuggling crap into the U.S., my boat spent 35 years SERVING the U.S. Navy.. and Jones Act puts the ex-smuggler boat ahead of mine in priority. STUPID law!

  • @user-uc8xb8lm5h
    @user-uc8xb8lm5h Рік тому +2

    They should be ashamed of themselves of what a waste of money to build and tear down

  • @shelbynamels973
    @shelbynamels973 Рік тому +3

    This is what you get when you make laws, and people find a way of (non)-complying.
    PS: Judge Sharon Gleason waived the $360 million dollar fined assessed by US Customs, but declared the shipping company non-compliant with the Jones Act. The train operation ceased and the tracks were removed.

    • @AtGnat8
      @AtGnat8 Рік тому +3

      Just another company circumventing the law and never getting punished for it. What a useless judge.

    • @berrytharp1334
      @berrytharp1334 Рік тому +2

      ​@@AtGnat8 They followed the letter of the law. The law should have been written better. I promise you the statute is voluminous enough to have not allowed this. They simply needed to add a few words.

    • @shelbynamels973
      @shelbynamels973 Рік тому +2

      @@AtGnat8 There is no such thing as 'circumventing' a law. You are either in compliance or in violation.

    • @koriko88
      @koriko88 3 місяці тому

      @@shelbynamels973Apparently not because people find all kinds of ways to technically comply with laws while violating the spirit of the law.

    • @shelbynamels973
      @shelbynamels973 3 місяці тому

      @@koriko88 Perhaps. But all there is to go by are the words printed in the books.
      Law makers may have had an intent, but that is not what is on the page.

  • @mired914
    @mired914 Рік тому

    Wow! Very cool!

  • @nunyabusiness5275
    @nunyabusiness5275 Рік тому +8

    Absurd laws