Bible Code, Time Travel and God's Hate! | Brandon - AZ Calls Back | Talk Heathen 03.47

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 лис 2019
  • New episode of Atheist Vanguard at 3pm: • Spiritual Warfare | At...
    Talk Heathen 03.47 for November 24, 2019 with Eric Murphy & Vi La Bianca.
    Call the show on Sundays 1:00-2:30pm CDT: 1-512-686-0279
    Don't like commercials? Become a patron & get ad-free episodes & more: / talkheathentome
    The podcast may be found at:
    www.spreaker.com/show/talkhea...
    ► Chat room rules:
    atheist-experience.org/chat-ru...
    -------
    WHAT IS TALK HEATHEN?
    Talk Heathen is a weekly call-in television show in Austin, Texas geared toward long-form and on-going dialogue with theists & atheists about religion, theism, & secularism. Talk Heathen is produced by the Atheist Community of Austin.
    Talk Heathen is filmed in front of a live studio audience every week at the Freethought Library of the Atheist Community of Austin.
    The Atheist Community of Austin is organized as a nonprofit educational corporation to develop & support the atheist community, to provide opportunities for socializing & friendship, to promote secular viewpoints, to encourage positive atheist culture, to defend the first amendment principle of government-religion separation, to oppose discrimination against atheists & to work with other organizations in pursuit of common goals.
    We define atheism as the lack of belief in gods. This definition also encompasses what most people call agnosticism.
    CONTACTS & SOCIAL MEDIA
    Instagram:
    Eric Murphy: Erictheheathen
    Jamie Boone: Jamietheheathen
    Twitter:
    Eric Murphy: @dirtyheathen
    Jamie Boone: @reason_evidence
    Facebook.com/talkheathen
    Reddit.com/r/talkheathen
    NOTES
    TalkHeathen is the official channel of Talk Heathen. "Talk Heathen" is a trademark of the ACA.
    The views and opinions expressed by hosts, guests, or callers are their own and not necessarily representative of the Atheist Community of Austin.
    Copyright © 2017 Atheist Community of Austin. All rights reserved.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 530

  • @Mike-os3pt
    @Mike-os3pt 4 роки тому +43

    My cereal once spelled out $ and now I'm a Scientologist.

    • @joesmoke9624
      @joesmoke9624 4 роки тому

      Mike Crap joke and maybe you are a Scientologist

    • @trekkiejunk
      @trekkiejunk 2 роки тому

      How'd you get a dollar sign in your alphabet cereal. Fuck. Now it's 2am and i really want a bowl of cereal.

  • @sunzi42
    @sunzi42 4 роки тому +48

    Brandon did just keep saying "Heads I win, Tails you loose!"

    • @user-gb7ji6xy5d
      @user-gb7ji6xy5d 4 роки тому +7

      He also is self-acknowledgedly servant to a fictional tyrant that hates people who disagrees with his twisted morals while claiming to be "love itself." What do you expect? This man is essentially a huge conglomeration of moral bankrupcy, delusion, self-contradictions and ignorance.

    • @advorak8529
      @advorak8529 4 роки тому +2

      @@user-gb7ji6xy5d It is fairly easy for a lay-person to be trained to distinguish between normal and abnormal cells when viewed under a microscope (or them being presented with a photograph of that view) by letting them guess and then giving feedback if their choice was correct. They soon go to 90% accuracy.
      What happens if you have 2 people doing this, but you give the feedback to both based on the first person's answer? So if A gets it right, B gets 'you choose correctly', no matter what B choose?
      You get a person B who is creating a more and more complicated, convoluted theory what distinguished 'good' from 'bad' cells, because they are disconnected from reality, but seem (to themselves) to get better and better ... up to 90% accuracy.
      And if you look at reading the Bible, trying to cram in all these contradictions: for example a spoiled child throwing a temper tantrum (the deluge/Noah & The Arc) because it's own creations with free will had, well, free will (did god did not foresee exactly that would happen? God is said to be all-knowing and so on ...) and didn't grovel enough and the idea of "god is love" and so on and so on ... what do you think happens? Exactly, convoluted theories based on fake/unverified claims ...
      And if you need to cling on to your view of a benevolent god that has your back and is on your side ...

    • @johnjordan3314
      @johnjordan3314 4 роки тому +1

      Evangelical Christian you in a nutshell

  • @reaper4641
    @reaper4641 4 роки тому +30

    My Cheerios keep saying “oooooo”, it’s definitely a message from god. When I drag my socks on a carpet Thor speaks through me also

    • @flwrpwr5351
      @flwrpwr5351 Рік тому +1

      Stoppp😂 this is the funniest thing I've heard all morning thank you

  • @ShadowPoet
    @ShadowPoet 4 роки тому +78

    I actually feel like I lost brain cells listening to that one.

    • @joesmoke9624
      @joesmoke9624 4 роки тому

      Andariel Drachen All two of them maybe

    • @zesound
      @zesound 4 роки тому +1

      Yeah same here. I stopped after the first 3mins.

    • @sycofreake1
      @sycofreake1 4 роки тому +2

      That was one of the most embarrassing arguments for Christianity ever🤭

    • @RB-zh1eq
      @RB-zh1eq 3 роки тому +1

      But "statistical math is highest form of math". wtf?

  • @chuckramos
    @chuckramos 4 роки тому +122

    I'd love to know why God would hide his prophecies in code so that they could only be discovered after the facts they are supposedly predicting.

    • @advorak8529
      @advorak8529 4 роки тому +20

      ... in a text that had to be translated first several time, and it only works in a specific translation, in a different translation other things emerge
      Also Moby Dick! Apparently dictated by God or something ...

    • @Raycu2
      @Raycu2 4 роки тому +7

      @Eziekle Crafts this isnt even a good troll

    • @tekbarrier
      @tekbarrier 4 роки тому +1

      I think one of the Bible code proponents said he found the assassination of Yitzhak Rabin before it happened and tried to warn him about it. But still, yeah...

    • @Raycu2
      @Raycu2 4 роки тому +3

      @@tekbarrier did he warn him before it or claim he tried to after it had already happened? Because I can claim I tried to warn kennedy or lincoln or I could make up a story about someone trying to warn them because what they found in the "bible code". If he has no evidence he tried to warn him from before it then I'd say its the typical " shoot an arrow at a tree and draw a circle where it hits" kind of prophecy.

    • @nicklikesYT
      @nicklikesYT 4 роки тому

      @@Raycu2 assuming i see just because u dont believe something doesnt make it true their are people who dont believe the holocaust

  • @tedgrant2
    @tedgrant2 4 роки тому +7

    If you take pairs of decimals contained in the value of pi and assign letters to those numbers, eventually you get the instruction manual for an Apple computer.
    You mostly get garbage, but ignoring that, it works very well.
    That's called the Apple pi code.

  • @karlrschneider
    @karlrschneider 4 роки тому +11

    Brandon is an elegant example of the fact that half of the people on earth are below average, and about seventy million are in the bottom one percent.

  • @danielmatarazzo3678
    @danielmatarazzo3678 4 роки тому +79

    Does this code exist in the original language or only when it's been translated several times?

    • @goranandersson3544
      @goranandersson3544 4 роки тому +17

      Almost any code exists in any book. The principle behind it is that there are so many combinations that you can get by skipping letters that it's almost impossible not to find any given text in any book.

    • @smasher.338
      @smasher.338 4 роки тому +14

      I think his point was that one change of a word would change the ENTIRE bible code. So as we dont have an original copy the entire idea that there is a perfect code put in by a deity is idiocy.

    • @awkwardlyrachel5524
      @awkwardlyrachel5524 4 роки тому +7

      Not to mention that the language through which the "magical code" was unlocked didn't exist until hundreds of years AFTER the book was put together (assuming the code is based on an English version).

    • @thetherorist9244
      @thetherorist9244 4 роки тому

      what separates divine from non devine is the mathematical precision of the text....the word DEMON literally means divine spirit and mathematical genius....look it up...its called wikipedia....simple

    • @danielmatarazzo3678
      @danielmatarazzo3678 4 роки тому +1

      @@thetherorist9244 so the word demon was derived from the Greek "daimon" which was a tutelar god (personal god, household god). Has nothing to do with "mathematical genius", I don't even understand what point your trying to make. Btw my original point was that in any other language you would get a different code.

  • @snowrider4495
    @snowrider4495 4 роки тому +25

    I dont like to call in with blank bullets! This guy forgot his gun!

  • @izmark671
    @izmark671 4 роки тому +31

    Alien the movie made the hair on my arm stand up, therefore god.

    • @MgtowRubicon
      @MgtowRubicon 4 роки тому +5

      Yes, that was god, and his name was H.R. Giger (r.i.p.).

    • @seanbirch
      @seanbirch 4 роки тому +1

      @@MgtowRubicon lol, "mgtow"

    • @Anonerak
      @Anonerak 4 роки тому

      Ahem its pronounced gawd or Jeebus you filthy heathen.

  • @thomasruwart1722
    @thomasruwart1722 4 роки тому +7

    Scared the crap out of me as I sit here listening and eating ice cream. But since it is winter, I feel better about not drowning. Whew! That was a close one...

  • @biancalawrence3178
    @biancalawrence3178 4 роки тому +53

    If the bible was written in Greek and Hebrew, how come the code messages are in modern English??

    • @ceen3237
      @ceen3237 4 роки тому +2

      They find the codes in the originals, doesn't make it more convincing, just pointing it out.

    • @joseyfuller
      @joseyfuller 4 роки тому

      There is a vrs a apostle wrote a language he didn't know. But the angels assured him that. It was not ment for him. But that it would be understood by the ones the message was ment for. People in the future people today

    • @biancalawrence3178
      @biancalawrence3178 4 роки тому +1

      @@joseyfuller How do you know that?

    • @perilouspoozer3749
      @perilouspoozer3749 4 роки тому +3

      The Bible has been translated into just about every language of the human race. It would be interesting to know if these coded messages occur in all those languages. Unless I am misunderstanding how this Bible code works.

    • @briancomley8210
      @briancomley8210 4 роки тому

      That was going to be my point as well, but you got there first. lt's a pity Brandon doesn't realise it as well.

  • @anthonysmith8800
    @anthonysmith8800 4 роки тому +3

    This caller is like a child clinging on to his favourite toy and will not let go at any cost.

  • @tarp-grommet
    @tarp-grommet 4 роки тому +4

    I can hear this guy lecturing his family at the dinner table every night. He knows all the answers and he's always right.

  • @billmcdonald4335
    @billmcdonald4335 4 роки тому +39

    Brandon keeps droppin' the term 'Royal' - but the Royal Statistical Society didn't even publish the paper. The journal in question, "Statistical Science", is published by the Institute of Mathematical Statistics. Furthermore, the 1994 paper was written by three Israelis - none of whom are atheists. And they be callin' *you* arrogant for makin' 'em stick to facts & reality. . .

    • @johnd.shultz7423
      @johnd.shultz7423 4 роки тому +6

      Its funny how a little honest detective work can change the entire picture!

    • @trekkiejunk
      @trekkiejunk 2 роки тому +2

      Bill, you're only saying that because you're not using your god-given tool of confirmation bias!

  • @surfk9836
    @surfk9836 4 роки тому +57

    God created man in his image.....then we returned the favor. - Voltaire

    • @CrybKeeper
      @CrybKeeper 4 роки тому +2

      The Bible doesn't say, "God created man in His image." It does say, " *We* created mankind in *Our* image."

    • @Praisestoallah7
      @Praisestoallah7 3 роки тому

      White jesus

    • @markmehlhorn2836
      @markmehlhorn2836 3 роки тому

      🤣😂

  • @Boris99999
    @Boris99999 4 роки тому +8

    Apparently they also did that to Tolstoy’s “War and peace” and Tolkien’s “Lord of the rings” and got all sorts of “predictions”.
    My point is: having a big enough amount of text and being able to choose algorithms to pick letters you can make this “Bible code” say virtually anything!

  • @astrosci8864
    @astrosci8864 4 роки тому +16

    Exodus 21: "Duck, Lincoln, Duck!

    • @astrosci8864
      @astrosci8864 4 роки тому +1

      @Craig G Yeah. Those Lincoln jokes are never cool, right? LOL!

  • @yarnpower
    @yarnpower 4 роки тому +17

    These calls make me kind of sad as they remind me of how closed minded I was as a believer.

    • @nicklikesYT
      @nicklikesYT 4 роки тому

      They did find noahs ark and even in isaiah 60:8 "Who are these that fly along like clouds, like doves to their nests?" Talked about airplanes that fly in clouds and land soft like doves why did u stop believing though im really curious

    • @AlexPBenton
      @AlexPBenton 2 роки тому +1

      Well, it sounds like you’ve broken free, so I’d say that’s an optimistic example!

    • @AlexPBenton
      @AlexPBenton 2 роки тому +3

      @@nicklikesYT That describes literally everything that flies.

  • @stevemanganiello9666
    @stevemanganiello9666 4 роки тому +17

    The book of genesis when run through the progran says "Paul is dead."

  • @tedgrant2
    @tedgrant2 4 роки тому +5

    The Bible Code is an example of the Texas Sharpshooter Fallacy.

  • @IanD-ut4dy
    @IanD-ut4dy 4 роки тому +32

    The Bible Code (Torah Code) has been proven a lie already and yet, theists still pull that up as an example of divinity. Wtf man!

    • @joerusso7851
      @joerusso7851 4 роки тому

      Diehards.

    • @derekmizer6293
      @derekmizer6293 4 роки тому +5

      @@joerusso7851 indoctrinated diehards. That force field of ignorance deflects All facts about reality.

    • @andrewey9389
      @andrewey9389 4 роки тому +2

      I knew a man in the 1970s who because of the Pyramid Inch, which he got out of the Bible,( somewhere) knew that the world was coming to an end in 1996. Still waiting

    • @thetherorist9244
      @thetherorist9244 4 роки тому

      what separates divine from non devine is the mathematical precision of the text....the word DEMON literally means divine spirit and mathematical genius....look it up...its called wikipedia....simple

    • @andrewey9389
      @andrewey9389 4 роки тому

      @Eziekle Crafts Satan only became evil because kicked him out of Heaven in a fizzy fit. Or so the story goes. Still prefer Harry Potter. But that is a different storybook. A different Fairy Tale, that doesn't take itself so seriously

  • @topcat2069
    @topcat2069 Рік тому +1

    “under the present brutal and primitive conditions on this planet, every person you meet should be regarded as one of the walking wounded. we have never seen a man or woman not slightly deranged by either anxiety or grief. we have never seen a totally sane human being.”
    ― Robert Anton Wilson

  • @xmillion1704
    @xmillion1704 4 роки тому +43

    "Statistical math is the highest form of math." Hmmm? Really? According to which experts and regarding which aspects?

    • @thomasruwart1722
      @thomasruwart1722 4 роки тому +3

      Statistically speaking, 99% of all N mathematicians say this where N is a number. Just using their own warped logic.

    • @alquemist7532
      @alquemist7532 4 роки тому +2

      So the statistical math produced a pattern. So what? Every book subjected to this test would produce one that is probably different from the others. Btw, which version or language of bible was used? Would the results be the same for all versions?
      Whatever the results may be does not confirm the existence of god.

    • @ngiyaxolisa
      @ngiyaxolisa 4 роки тому +1

      Didn't Mark Twain say that "there are three kinds of lies-- lies, damned lies and statistics?

    • @fomori2
      @fomori2 4 роки тому

      But he said it was a 'jury' reviewed article... They bypassed their peers and went straight to the courts!

  • @Cheese-n-Cake16
    @Cheese-n-Cake16 4 роки тому +1

    What is funny is that there was a 1999 paper in the same journal that "solved" the 1994 paper which was called "fatally defective, and that their result merely reflects on the choices made in designing their experiment and collecting the data for it."

  • @astrosci8864
    @astrosci8864 4 роки тому +3

    John 3:16: "Paul is Dead". LOL!

    • @anonymousjohnson976
      @anonymousjohnson976 3 роки тому

      Is that the apostle Paul or Paul McCartney?

    • @astrosci8864
      @astrosci8864 3 роки тому

      @@anonymousjohnson976 They are the same, aren't they? LOL

  • @timhyatt9185
    @timhyatt9185 4 роки тому +20

    brandon -- uses literally the definition of fallacy of personal incredulity.....
    it always amazes me how people can use the bible code to come up wiht names and such.. when if it's going to work, it would have to be in the original hebrew... and they don't realize hebrew HAS NO VOWELS.....so "bugs bunny" would show up as "bgbnn" if could just as easily be big benn, bag bonn, bog binn, beg bann,,,,,
    as far as denial , if appologist have gotten one thing exactly right, is how to deny contradictory facts

  • @mcshundess
    @mcshundess 4 роки тому +8

    What a fallacy ! Actually, it's drowning that causes eating ice cream.

  • @malirk
    @malirk 4 роки тому +4

    I thought the Bible code was fringe nonsense but Matt Slick was arguing it last night and some people in the chat were impressed....

    • @Diviance
      @Diviance 4 роки тому +6

      It is fringe nonsense. It came from old Judaic Cabala crap and Islam stuff. It works in a whole lot of random books, actually. Because that is kind of how patterns work.

    • @ricardovonkrypton8908
      @ricardovonkrypton8908 4 роки тому

      Matt Slick is fringe nonsense.

  • @mehford30
    @mehford30 3 роки тому +3

    Royal statistical society, Statistical Science Vol 14, solving the bible code pgs 150-173. Its the refutation in the same journal and published in 1999

  • @darkrider962
    @darkrider962 3 роки тому +2

    LOL Brandon should become a comedian because every stupid thing he says is comedy gold!!

  • @dangerics
    @dangerics 4 роки тому +1

    “Brandon...thank you.”
    That’s beautiful.

  • @pud1978
    @pud1978 4 роки тому +3

    Is there a "Book of Eric" code?

  • @suburban-vampire
    @suburban-vampire 21 день тому

    I liked Brandon's notifications going off. Someone was trying to get him to stop the call lol

  • @stevieduggan1763
    @stevieduggan1763 3 роки тому +1

    Two shrimps, Chris and Dave, we're best mates. One day Dave told Chris he didn't want to be a shrimp any more. He goes to see the sea witch and gets turned into a shark. After two days he misses his friend, so gets turned back.
    He rushes to see his best mate, but Chris is scared Dave will eat him. Dave says "I'm a prawn again Christian. 😁

  • @daved4269
    @daved4269 3 роки тому +1

    Funny that in Volume 14 (1999) of the same journal (Statistical Science), they published a rebuttal of the original article, showing that the original research was "fatally defective"

  • @mercedeswalt6621
    @mercedeswalt6621 4 роки тому

    I’ll have to relisten to this later. I’ve had Christian students on my Campus present this argument to me. But they called it something other than code, so I forgot what it was. Now I found it and now I know, yay!

  • @stevieduggan1763
    @stevieduggan1763 3 роки тому +1

    I'm gonna do this with my copy of the book of Eric, and see what I get lol.

  • @astrosci8864
    @astrosci8864 4 роки тому +3

    Does anyone want to make a bet that the Royal Statistical Society put that Bible Code thing out there as an April Fools joke?

  • @nightthornkvala94132
    @nightthornkvala94132 4 роки тому +5

    How are they finding some code using English letters when the language didn't exist when the books were written?

    • @user-gb7ji6xy5d
      @user-gb7ji6xy5d 4 роки тому

      Most likely saying that their god is so great he makes the arrangements needed exactly for the translated text to show the secret messages eons before the creation of earth, mankind, languages, and writing implements. It's not remotely hard to justify anything when you have "omnipotence," "magic," "mysterious ways," or "shut up and don't question otherwise you'll regret it right after you die" in your repertoire.
      Pathetic, are they not?

    • @derekmizer6293
      @derekmizer6293 4 роки тому

      Magic

    • @twig8523
      @twig8523 4 роки тому +3

      🙃 Ya know, I think god put the code in there, latent, waiting, needing to be translated however many times, just so Brandon from Arizona could call Talk Heathen about it. All in order to convert them using their own atheist science! How could they possibly argue with the ROYAL statistical society? I mean, 1 in 50 quadrillion!! 😆😂🤣 ... Hmm 😕 Poor guy. You can lead a horse to water, indeed. 😔

    • @thelocustproject2882
      @thelocustproject2882 4 роки тому

      Twiggie Leon
      But wouldn’t an omnipotent god actually be able to do that?

  • @TonyRueb
    @TonyRueb 4 роки тому +18

    I love this caller, the caller that has no idea what statistics actually is "The highest level of math" -- and what do you know about the topic?

    • @wadepo1
      @wadepo1 4 роки тому +1

      Brandon Irish , are you the same idiot that phoned in the show? Lmfao

    • @wadepo1
      @wadepo1 4 роки тому +1

      Brandon Irish , ok stupid, time for an education. There are 3,116,480 letters in the bible, by using the idiots bible code which takes every 7th letter it leaves you a string of approximately 445,000 random letters, out of all those random numbers you will coincidently find things that seem to show some profound hidden message, when it’s not. It’s a numbers game, that’s why Moby Dick is just as predictive as the bible is, and why a book like War and Peace would provide even more than that. For someone who claims to have such a high level of mathematics, you’ve clearly proven that you don’t even understand the basics. You’re an idiot, please learn to use your brain.

    • @xmillion1704
      @xmillion1704 4 роки тому +1

      @@bbbirish74 - The main difference between a bull, shitting, and a bullshitter who uses shit as a tool (and usually also eats shit) . . .

    • @wadepo1
      @wadepo1 4 роки тому +1

      Brandon Irish , it using the same bullshit method, all it does is create a way to create a different random list of letters and the effect is the same,, with enough random letters it’s inevitable for someone to find something in there that seems relevant to them. You still don’t get it, you’re still not listening, you’re still not thinking. You’re being willfully ignorant, or you’re just really really stupid.

    • @wadepo1
      @wadepo1 4 роки тому

      Brandon Irish , are you going to phone again in next week and argue this same debunked method Brandon?

  • @flyingdog1498
    @flyingdog1498 4 роки тому +6

    He is going in circles, who can know anything about the actual direction he is going.

  • @basba_qal
    @basba_qal 4 роки тому

    The prime consolation is that you showed him where the water was.

  • @49perfectss
    @49perfectss 4 роки тому +3

    That was hilarious hahaha

  • @oscargordon
    @oscargordon 4 роки тому +2

    Most times these Bible code use some version of Hebrew text which did not have vowels. Now imagine you are playing Boggle/Word Search on a grid of random consonants that is 1000x1000 large. How many words/phrases can you find in rows, columns, and diagonals that "mean something" when you insert the vowels of your choice? The fun thing about Bible Codes and computers these days, is you can keep resizing your grid and keep finding new "astonishing" sequences that "can't be explained".

  • @astrosci8864
    @astrosci8864 4 роки тому +2

    Melville 5:12 - "I hate whales". LOL!

  • @amyv8416
    @amyv8416 4 роки тому +1

    Vi hit it. If every version of the bible came up with the same message using any algorithm, then it would be interesting.

  • @JvS1711
    @JvS1711 4 роки тому +6

    18:40 doesn't matter who the "they" is, Brandon, if they're replicating the experiment.

  • @malirk
    @malirk 4 роки тому +1

    Can someone post a link to the paper this guy kept talking about. Thanks.

  • @MrDanAng1
    @MrDanAng1 4 роки тому +11

    6:17 "Statistical math is the highest form of math that we know of."
    What does that mean?
    What is "highest form" refering to?
    It's not a mathematical branch that have high precision, statistical anomalies are usual.
    It's not highly advanced calculations, it's basal calculations.
    It's not cutting edge mathematic that lead to amazing new understanding of the world.
    I don't in any way mean to take a piss on neither statiscic nor Brandon, I simply have no clue how, when or where statistic is the highest form of mathematics.
    In an insurance company, maybe, because it's the most useful form of math there, rivaled only by accountancy.

    • @xmillion1704
      @xmillion1704 4 роки тому +4

      Brandon's is the highest form of bullshit known to people that inhabit his mind.

    • @barkYdarkATFB
      @barkYdarkATFB 4 роки тому +3

      It means it makes the hairs on the back of his neck stand up, apparently.

  • @UndoneFakeJesu
    @UndoneFakeJesu 4 роки тому

    Does anyone have the article that the caller is referring to? I would absolutely love to read it, especially the stuff that the caller left out.

  • @ngiyaxolisa
    @ngiyaxolisa 4 роки тому +1

    I'm surprised no one asked what version of the Bible was run through the program? Was it in Aramaic, Hebrew, Koine Greek, Middle English, Modern English, etc?

  • @niallevans2375
    @niallevans2375 4 роки тому +1

    The Royal Statistical Society does not appear to publish a journal or magazine called Statistical Science. Their magazine Significance only appears to have the last three or four years available online. So, not sure where Brandon got his info. The intro to the magazine does say they "challenge myths", so it may be they've done an article on letter sequencing. Brandon's quote that the article deduced that it "could not be attributed to anything in the known universe" sounds implausible. If you're out there Brandon, post the link to this article in a reply to me.

  • @Kestrel1971
    @Kestrel1971 4 роки тому +2

    The so-called Bible Code can be applied to any body of text and patterns will emerge. This is a function of language, not any sort of innate encoded message.

  • @AGrayPhantom
    @AGrayPhantom 4 роки тому +1

    I don't think he ever acknowledged that his Bible code also worked with Moby Dick.

  • @MsDjessa
    @MsDjessa 4 роки тому +3

    If god is unhappy with our unbelief, he should give us some evidence that he exists.

  • @chrispitchforth621
    @chrispitchforth621 4 роки тому +1

    He thought we would be stumped by this?
    The only thing that stumps us, is how he could think the Bible code is evidence.

  • @lumeronswift
    @lumeronswift 4 роки тому

    If I keep one eye closed and jump up and down while looking at The Cat in the Hat book cover upside down, it kind of looks like his hat is a worm that is trying to eat both ends of the book and failing miserably to do so.

  • @Arkloyd
    @Arkloyd 4 роки тому +2

    So he starts off with a "No true Scotsman" fallacy, and it just rolled downhill from there. It floored me when he said that yahweh, the hebrew god of slavery and conquest rape that can't forgive without bloodshed and suffering, is loving.

  • @donnawashington5576
    @donnawashington5576 4 роки тому

    What languages did they use?

  • @cygnustsp
    @cygnustsp 4 роки тому +2

    Nobody over 40 should be named Brandon

  • @kyo66
    @kyo66 4 роки тому +8

    will you get the same results from every version of the bible ?

    • @kinglyzard
      @kinglyzard 4 роки тому +4

      Hell no!

    • @MrDanAng1
      @MrDanAng1 4 роки тому +2

      THAT would be a MUCH better sign of divinity or magic or something statistically awesome! 😀

    • @goranandersson3544
      @goranandersson3544 4 роки тому +2

      You can get the same results from any book you like.

    • @xmillion1704
      @xmillion1704 4 роки тому +3

      I was just reading the stains in my shorts and divined that "God is a righteous God", or maybe it was "ridiculous". It's an art, not a science.

  • @JarottM
    @JarottM 4 роки тому +6

    Oh please. The Bible code has been debunked over and over. All they had to do is change the size of the book and the "code" was reduced to rubbish.

  • @alanrosenthal6323
    @alanrosenthal6323 Рік тому +1

    I believe that when the bible code thing was first discovered it was very impressive. That feeling probably last several days until other people realized that it was just an amusing trick. Brandon clearly didn't bother to read any of the follow-ups. Poor deluded guy.

  • @dontimberman5493
    @dontimberman5493 4 роки тому

    I read the article from the Royal Statistical society.
    1. It did not make it to pear review due to bad practices.
    2. The Royal Statistical society dose not back up the findings.
    3 one of the original “researchers” has Distanced him self from finding and the whole project.

  • @MrStalingonzalez
    @MrStalingonzalez 2 роки тому +1

    Brandon: 'This code thing came out of smart people like you, atheist'

    • @neighbourhoodwitch18
      @neighbourhoodwitch18 2 роки тому

      Brandon has confused me beyond…well…pretty much anything. I’ll stick with my atheism 😊

  • @twowardrobeswardrobes1536
    @twowardrobeswardrobes1536 2 роки тому +1

    The vocab in the Bible is pretty simple, so if you are going to find patterns in any book it’d be that. I bet the Hungry Caterpillar has some divine code hidden in it too.

  • @perkeyser2032
    @perkeyser2032 4 роки тому +1

    How did this caller manage to survive this long? I wouldn't ask him if he knew how to breathe.

  • @joecoolioness6399
    @joecoolioness6399 4 роки тому +2

    Damnit, now I am a white whalist, thanks Eric! why did you have to point out the Moby Dick code? Now I am a true believer and Ishmael is my messiah.

  • @karlrschneider
    @karlrschneider 4 роки тому +2

    If you take 100 Brandons and give them typewriters with random keys they will eventually type out "Brandon is a fucking idiot". He is clearly an elegant example of how 'faith' (a piss poor substitute for thinking) and 'religion' are so effective in turning human minds into dogshit.

  • @KedgeDragon
    @KedgeDragon 3 роки тому

    Was the letter count made in English? Or in the language it was written in? Or did God tuck the code in KJV only?

  • @laapache1
    @laapache1 4 роки тому

    is talk heathen selling those posters

  • @joseyfuller
    @joseyfuller 4 роки тому

    Just believe.

  • @matthewchang5701
    @matthewchang5701 2 роки тому

    We're still alive and kicken

  • @thedollyllama5325
    @thedollyllama5325 4 роки тому +2

    Three minutes in and we already have an argument from ignorance and a no true Scotsman fallacy.

    • @wabbajack2
      @wabbajack2 9 місяців тому

      Three minutes into any Christian apologetics will yield basically the same thing.

  • @astrosci8864
    @astrosci8864 4 роки тому +1

    1 in 50 quadrillion? Yeah, right Brandon. This is a great example of an argument from authority. Theists do this to sound important and to sneak their God in. This is one of many tricks that theists use. It is getting old and nobody should believe it anymore.

  • @astrosci8864
    @astrosci8864 4 роки тому +11

    "Moses had no idea what he was writing." You heard it here first, folks.

    • @joesmoke9624
      @joesmoke9624 4 роки тому

      Astro Sci Sweeping statement

    • @joesmoke9624
      @joesmoke9624 4 роки тому

      Kenneth Bachman Jesus lived in my book.

    • @joesmoke9624
      @joesmoke9624 4 роки тому

      Kenneth Bachman No. Not the same.

    • @joesmoke9624
      @joesmoke9624 4 роки тому

      Kenneth Bachman Prove what. That you’ve read Harry Potter books. I have not

    • @joesmoke9624
      @joesmoke9624 4 роки тому

      Kenneth Bachman I’m not a so called Christian and I have never read the bible like I think you have my friend.
      Goodnight from the UK

  • @mrjekyllandhyde9941
    @mrjekyllandhyde9941 4 роки тому +3

    The Bible is no more magical than Moby Dick ? yes I agree

  • @freddyfulong8497
    @freddyfulong8497 3 роки тому

    A simple google search would show that statistical science published a thorough rebuttal to the 1994 article in 1999 stated the original paper was fatally defective.

  • @izmark671
    @izmark671 4 роки тому +2

    "you know" is always the lead.

    • @janinecarson8380
      @janinecarson8380 4 роки тому +1

      😉 It's like a tic, abbreviated into something like y'no. I wish I had dollar for every time he says it.

  • @glennbeck9496
    @glennbeck9496 4 роки тому +6

    I thought calculus or physics were the "highest forms of math."
    Statistics seems much more remedial by comparison.

    • @fernandotorrero779
      @fernandotorrero779 4 роки тому +1

      Physics are not math, physics uses math but are not it

    • @xmillion1704
      @xmillion1704 4 роки тому +1

      @@fernandotorrero779 - Are not statistics simply a discipline that uses math as well, to interpret data?

  • @michaeldeaton
    @michaeldeaton 4 роки тому +1

    Much like H Ron Wyatt's Noah's Ark is on top of mount ararat in Turkey claims from the 70s, it always astounds me when these Bible Code claims from the 90s are still out there floating around and taken credibly by these people. This guy saw that show on the History Channel in like 94 and has never let it go.

  • @plowenson
    @plowenson 4 роки тому

    Which bible did they use??

  • @glenhill9884
    @glenhill9884 4 роки тому

    When someone says they are using bible code, the first question to ask is this: which bible was examined and why? They are different. You have to justify why a certain one IN ENGLISH were examined.

  • @ecocentrichomestead6783
    @ecocentrichomestead6783 4 роки тому

    I grew up in a Christian home and have complaints with what I say as immoral stance and attitudes of Christians. I have been given the no true Scotsman fallacy thousands of times.

  • @pabstep2611
    @pabstep2611 4 роки тому +1

    That doesn't really work for the bible in other languages, does it?

  • @astrosci8864
    @astrosci8864 4 роки тому

    Luke, John, Numbers, Exodus, and Herman (Melville). Sounds legit to me!

  • @damyr
    @damyr 4 роки тому +2

    This man clearly didn't hear for "The catcher in the rye".

  • @netzach21
    @netzach21 4 роки тому +1

    I'm, sorry but I need citation on the "mathematician" that "validate" the bible code

  • @Fluffykeith
    @Fluffykeith 4 роки тому +4

    Part of the problem with this Bible Code nonsense is that if there really WERE a hidden code built into the letters and spacing and so on by some divine agent, it would surely only TRULY be in the ORIGINAL manuscripts.
    Which we don't have.
    The versions of the texts that people are applying these Bible code methods to, were finalized after the work of scholars over time.
    From the Wiki "The precise order of consonantal letters represented in the Hebrew Masoretic Text was only finalized in its current form in the first century, largely through the energies of Rabbi Akiva. However, it is known from earlier versions, such as the Dead Sea Scrolls, that the number of letters was not constant before this."

    • @anonymousjohnson976
      @anonymousjohnson976 3 роки тому

      They didn't have punctuation back then either.

    • @Fluffykeith
      @Fluffykeith 3 роки тому

      @@anonymousjohnson976 Meaning?

    • @anonymousjohnson976
      @anonymousjohnson976 3 роки тому

      @@Fluffykeith : Meaning that since punctuation was not invented yet, the text would be very difficult to decipher. For instance: "godisnowhere". Is it "god is now here or god is nowhere." Or, "Letseatmom". Is it "Lets eat mom" or "Let's eat, mom."

  • @OverlordShamala
    @OverlordShamala 4 роки тому +3

    I've heard about that story, about running the Genesis through that so called 'computer'. Supposedly it only works in an original story, if you use the King James Version & only in English language, because English is the "perfect language". That's when you get "positive results". I ignored that story as so much B.S.

  • @NickvonZ
    @NickvonZ 4 роки тому +3

    Sounds like Brandon has "A Beautiful Mind". Also, how the heck would he know that ALL those dudes are atheists, agnostics.... Just as I typed that, you asked it! PROPHECY! YES!! 😃

  • @keineahnung74
    @keineahnung74 4 роки тому +4

    Why are the books of religions so poorly written? To appeal to gullible persons?

    • @IheartChiroptera
      @IheartChiroptera 4 роки тому

      The modern ones, e.g. Dianetics or the Book of Mormon, were written for the gullible, but the ancients ones were simply written by ignorant barbarians.

  • @DiegoJinkusMusic
    @DiegoJinkusMusic 4 роки тому +1

    Hey!
    Brandon... votes.

  • @jollytemplar3670
    @jollytemplar3670 4 роки тому +1

    Brandon’s god sounds metal as fuck

  • @NeverTalkToCops1
    @NeverTalkToCops1 4 роки тому

    Take every third letter of the Buybull, divide it by Wednesday, season it with a flourish of dog feces, and voila, The Dummies Guide to the BuyBull.

  • @siyano
    @siyano 4 роки тому +1

    with the bible code taking some random here and there I can spell "This book is nonsense and you should stop taking it as truth!"

  • @arniekando6846
    @arniekando6846 4 роки тому

    All I can say to you is that as a reborn Christian I was in a dark place after some years after being saved. On a specific day I cried to the Lord and complained with Him and argued and battled with Him and my mind was moving in the direction of atheism because I argued that no matter how hard I pray or read the Bible its like its all just blank, no feedback, ever...THEN......something happened where the Lord spoke to me on that day I was most disponded. The way it happened is a way that no atheistic logic can explain....and Jesus spoke to me. I understand that not everyone has this experience but what I can tell you is that if you think Jesus is not listening and the silence is sometimes deafening and that translate to there is no God then you going to get one heck of a surprise one day. Basically what I realized then is that God can jump up and down before you and entertain you so that you can constantly think there is a God, but He does not. God has a special pleasure in faith, yes, there is the secret. You cannot please God without faith. These 2 host has no faith in the God that revealed Himself to me, what a pity. For it is impossible, in the case of those who have once been enlightened, who have tasted the heavenly gift, and have shared in the Holy Spirit, and have tasted the goodness of the word of God and the powers of the age to come, and then have fallen away, to restore them again to repentance, since they are crucifying once again the Son of God to their own harm and holding him up to contempt.

    • @MrKit9
      @MrKit9 4 роки тому

      Oh just shut the fuck up you incoherent, ignorant, uneducated Christtard!

    • @n1ghtmar3mach1n3
      @n1ghtmar3mach1n3 4 роки тому

      They have medication for that.

    • @n1ghtmar3mach1n3
      @n1ghtmar3mach1n3 4 роки тому

      They have medication for that.

  • @UberTheRandom
    @UberTheRandom 4 роки тому +1

    Something outside our universe? Sounds like Galactus. All heil Galan, creator of the universe!

    • @NeverTalkToCops1
      @NeverTalkToCops1 4 роки тому +1

      Don't forget Norin Radd, herald of Galactus. Also known as the Silver Surfer.

  • @richardfarrer5616
    @richardfarrer5616 4 роки тому

    I got interested enough to read the original paper. The arguments are rather more subtle than the discussion suggested and, IF the parameters were all chosen before the letter sequence was extracted and analysed then the results are highly unlikely to be by chance.
    On the other hand, there are a lot of parameters to set. I could turn my previous comment round and state that the results are highly improbable if the parameters were set before the extract happened. If the parameters were tweaked at all after the event, the result is less surprising.