Ding ding ding ding! Johnny tell him what he's won! Heh, in all seriousness, you're correct. These companies want to dominate and control the markets. that's kind of the point of "winning" the competition. You really see a difference btwn Standard Oil and Amazon?
@@anastacioguerrero1527 they didn't actually hurt Facebook. It's all theater. Look up a study called "Effectiveness of Apple's App Tracking Transparency" and come to your own conclusions how effective it really is.
Apple doesn’t give user an option not to have personally identifiable data gathered by Apple itself when using their services. In fact their privacy policy explicitly says they do gather it. The fact that you get an option to opt out of iOS sharing certain extra NON-identifiable information (when Apple tells you that’s what you’re being given the choice to opt out of) in no way implies you ever had a choice (other than not use the services) with the identify and information they’ve obtained your consent to gather.
Tim Cook 2015: We believe that people have a fundamental right to privacy. The American people demand it, the constitution demands it, morality demands it. Tim Cook 2022: Let's increase our ad revenue!
@@LivingLinux Of course they need to have a viable profitable business in order to ‘protect’ anything. Seeing what web page you’re looking at while signed into the app store servers, something you consent to, and which generates data that only Apple can access (and protects per their privacy policy) in no way conflicts with your ‘right to privacy’. You can’t have ‘privacy from Apple itself’ while using their services.
@teebles _"I guess we'll go ahead and bribe the regulators to throw those dirty repair techs in jail! After all, repair is tech piracy!"_ Don't knock it - the MPAA did just this. For years, backing up legally-purchased media was an offense punishable by jail. Just read one of those FBI warnings on the old VHS tapes. Note that the warning says "reproduction" _in addition to_ distribution and exhibition. That's not a typo.
Not really. This is basically a BS clickbait study. The App Store app is basically a glorified web browser. The apps and their descriptions are all on the server. Of course they can see what ‘pages’ are viewed on their server and this was all consented to in the Media & Services terms and conditions (and has virtually nothing to do with the optional iOS analytics that you can turn off if you prefer.) If people didn’t want Apple to see them look at an app then they shouldn’t have agreed to it.
@@EarthIsNotFlat _"The oil barons' contract is basically a glorified slavery agreement. If people didn't want oil companies to steal their land and enslave their children, they shouldn't have agreed to it."_ - Some idiot circa 1900
@@Mavendow Are you implying that you had no other choice but to agree to share that data? Of course you had a choice: don’t use the products and services that require you to share it. They’re totally up front about what you’re agreeing to share. Given that the App Store is little more than a web browser, and Apple runs the servers that deliver the pages it displays, it would in fact be difficult for them NOT to be able to see what app pages you’re looking at. Of course some people are easily led and can’t tell the difference between manufactured outrage and actual abuses (like, for example, weaponizing the law to punish those who reverse engineer DRM) which serves nobodies purpose other than the clickbaiter and leaches who pushed this ‘study’ and suit.
@@Mavendow PS If somebody signed a voluntary contract agreeing to give up their land then nobody ‘stole’ it, they gave it away. If you’re arguing there was no voluntary contract then the specific circumstances would have to be litigated to see, but there can be little doubt that Apple’s privacy policy, that’s right out in the open for anybody to read, and that’s incorporated into the terms that customers agree to to access services like the App Store, is a voluntary contract that one could easily refrain from accepting.
I have found that many people seem to perceive the terms “Privacy”, and “Security” to be the same thing when they clearly aren’t. Viewing these terms interchangeably, and becoming complacent thereafter is a big mistake. A corporation like Crapple, or Goolag, et al, (should) have the best security models in place, as the function of their business relies on airtight security. A model with airtight security could allow for privacy, but this is not in the best interest of our corporate overlords… What good is having billions of people on your networks, if you’re not able to exploit and profit off of them? Decentralized, anonymous networks, and P2P mesh-nets are the future, where security and privacy don’t have to be mutually exclusive.
I just don't understand why dealing under the table like this is the norm when it's proven time and time again that just providing choice and being honest usually wins out. 🙄
We are talking about a company that sends an army of lawyers at Hollywood studios if bad guys are shown with apple products. Why are people so surprised.
Thing is, it only wins out the tiny percentage of privacy conscious tech savvy people. You gotta acknowledge that we're a minority within a minority. We need to spread awareness to the "normies" On how bad this is and on cybersecurity in general.
Fewer notice if you don't ask. The last thing any of these companies wants, is for people to imagine they have rights to information about themselves. It is a multi-billion-dollar industry of corporate surveillance, data brokerage, and targeted psychological manipulation. There is no oversight under the table.
Hearing stuff like this just tires me out. I moved away from Android and Windows to MacOS and iOS back in 2017 for privacy reasons and Apple just keeps pushing people like me away. Ads in first-party apps, tracking when I say not to, it is exhausting. I am seriously considering just using this stuff till it dies then moving to Linux and GrapheneOS. I’m done with giving up my privacy and information for a slightly more convenient user experience. I use Linux on the desktop daily and it is great.
That is the way. If you want it your way you quite much have to set it up yourself! I guess Android with third party firmware wins for now? baseband isn't won yet!
you moved away from android to iOS for privacy? thats what their marketing does. if you do a little research, you realize iOS/MacOS is not that much better than a windows computer and an android phone with GMS. any stock android rom (stock = aosp = only the pure open source android, none of the proprietary google play services) will come with basically no telemetry (minus opt-in telemetry for crash reporting and such). stock android IS private, you dont need fancy grapheneos for privacy. (grapheneos helps you STAY private when using proprietary software, so you dont have to try very hard to stay private when using grapheneos, because the operating system does it all for you, while stock android starts off as private, but as soon as you download any apps your probably bombarded with facebook/firebase/etc trackers) what made you move to apple's ecosystem? was it based on their (incredibly) deceptive marketing? when i came to these realizations, my instinct was to do research and find what worked best for me, which was lineageos (i would use 3rd party software to try and "mimick" grapheneos's features, because im not going to give up my galaxy s5 for a silly google phone)
@@kidmosey yep, i switched away from my iphone SE to the (older) galaxy s5 for this very reason. (back in 2017) it is still my daily phone and preforms perfectly fine with lineageos, and is completely free of google spyware because it runs lineageos. (none of the security perks of grapheneos's permissions, but its still miles more private than any iphone or GMS android ever)
@@anon_y_mousse I distro hopped for a long time but I have most likely found my permanent one in Fedora. Relatively up to date, stable, just works 99% of the time. I used Arch for a while but there was always small issues that would annoy me. I’m mostly no-nonsense. I have some GNOME extensions and kernel modules and that’s all.
I think the worst part is the lack of transparency from user to service. Like they have all this data collected that isn’t available to ourselves. For example if I read an article 2 days ago. Apple will have that time stamp on their servers but if I’m trying to figure out which articles I have read specifically the one from 2 days ago, I won’t have any access to it.
@zz zip or proprietary code that they don't want others to copy, but even that would only encourage competitive development; who can do something the best? secret proprietary code only ensures profitability
@@chrisdavidson911 moderately so, but they can find vulnerabilities anyway, then exploit them for longer periods of time since no one but criminals and the handful of privy individuals would be looking at it. In the end it only makes it harder for the honest community members to find and fix.
@zz zip >Not really that hard I mean, if they open up their source codes and realize it does actually negatively affect their profits, it’s not like they can just make it private again, bc the code’s already out in the wild. tho i suppose they could run a pilot program to check how negatively open source would affect their profits, and go from there
Yap. I always told my apple friends when they said they turned off tracking "how do you know apple isn't lying?" They always acted like i'm shizophrenic.
@@anonanon3066 turned off tracking on proprietary software 💀 the only way you can know your software isnt lying is when its not proprietary, which ios is.
@@ecodev15 as if android is any better, do you expect every normal person to even know what an progaming code is?? let alone have the skills to actualy dig into android
‘tracking’ the pages on their app store service that you load (off of their servers?) Of course they are, they told you they were, you consented to them doing so, and they never gave you a choice or setting to ‘opt out’ of it. ffs, you’re going to hold the fact that Apple did make some optional stuff opt-out *against* them (because you can’t opt out of everything while still using their service?) That’s just stupid.
For me not so much that Apple collects the data, rather they claim they don’t, offer controls that preclude the collection, and bypass all this and do it anyway. I am thankful for the folks who have the skill set no time to look into and find crap like this. Hats off.
Man, I used to be such a big Apple fan way back when the first iMac came out, and even to this day I still think that is the single best computer I've ever used, but modern day Apple scares me. It's every bit as evil as Google or Meta, and yet it's the only company that still insists on pretending they care about the user despite how transparently false that is.
So long as people have a memory that lasts one day tops...........why wouldn't they do it? Look how long it took you to come to terms what was always obvious? lol.
@@MrBottlecapBill Twenty years ago, people who weren't very political seemed to expect mainstream companies not to commit criminal acts against customers. That seemed more like the domain of shady operations that got shut down. There was an expectation of basic law and order at least among normies. People were pumped for their free GMail accounts because it was just free shit. Americans seemed to share basic freedom and independence-oriented values twenty years ago. Alex Jones was just a vague eccentric character, not someone with any special insight. You should have gloated about how obvious it was back then so you'd have convinced people before our social credit scores were being passed between Apple and the various governments.
The issue is no one is willing to live without their smartphone because they care more about convenience. Switch to an old flip, brick or slide phone - complete privacy when they don’t have the apps or settings in the first place.
@@Spazza42 Except the actually old flip phones don't work in most first world countries as those networks have been switched off. In addition the new "old" flip phones that work on the 4G network usually use a simplified android build and most have facebook preloaded. Only GrapheneOS, LineageOS and the Linux phone can truly save you if are willing to put up with any shortcomings.
More than likely what's going on is they're changing the definition of "privacy" legally to exclude the option of outing out of data collection in any way, shape, or form. To these companies, "privacy" means turning off "relevant ads." It's like seeing "natural flavor" and "no artificial flavors" on the food you eat.
@@clarkesuperman The data is attached to an "anonymized" profile, but remains grouped. Correlating data from multiple sources, the anonymity is removed. This is the foundation of the data brokering industry. They are using a loophole to claim it is anonymous, but rely on the opposite being true for the data to have value. Truly randomized data would have little value, for the purpose of targeted manipulation.
@@fabioc9142 It does have, just like everyone consented to when they signed up to use the *services* involved. Does nobody understand the difference between a product and a service? Of course they can see what you do on their services.
I used to trust Apple and still use a MacBook for work and an iPad for streaming. Your video about GrapheneOS made me switch over - it's been over a month now and I had zero regrets before watching this video. Now, it's even less. Privacy is just not compatible with corporations.
It is when software firmware and drivers are open source along with government regulations on data collection. raw android doesn't have tracking that you can't remove. You just gotta get rid of the proprietary Google apps.
Can I just ask you about GrapheneOS real quick? You've had no problems sending texts or receiving calls? How about the camera, because Pixel has their own dedicated camera app that uses AI technology and stuff to enhance images. is that missing from GrapheneOS?
@@friendofp.24 SMS and calls work fine. I installed the Google Camera App - yes, I use Play services, but with restricted permissions. Don't know about the AI stuff, I revoked network permissions for the camera app and usually AI is far from privacy focused, I guess.
@@friendofp.24 Why would he have issues with texts or calls? Even eSIMs work but you need to install (sandboxed) GSF to install an eSIM after which you can uninstall GSF. As for Google Camera, I find GrapheneOS Camera adequate enough for most situations-and for those times where I'd like to take the full advantage of my Pixel 6 Pro camera and Google's AI algorithms, I have a separate profile that has GSF, Google Camera and Google Gallery (needed for Magic Eraser and such features) installed that I can quickly switch to, take as many pictures as I want, and then logout from it back to my main profile which doesn't run anything Google. Best of both worlds!
Thank you for taking such good sponsorships. Keeping up to date with all of this BS can be very depressing and seeing a cute cat at the end helps keep me watching until the end.
This is where I quite like Signal. Iirc, they were once legally compelled by the courts & FBI to hand over "all" the data they held for a particular user. The FBI got what they wanted in the end, but it wasn't what they expected and I'd argue it was hardly worth the bother. Literally, the unix time of the account's creation. Unformatted. 🤣🤣🤣
I've convinced my boyfriend to text me using Signal. Makes me feel a lot better about our communications since, otherwise, everything is completely unencrypted (as far as I know). The sad thing is that if the government thinks that something suspicious is going on between the two of us, there is nothing stopping them from seeing what we've sent each other because he is in the military and doesn't really have a choice.
@@eliseosterbrink8000 You have a right to privacy. Exercising said right cannot reasonably be deemed "suspicious" by any of these bureaucrats, no matter how many ways they try to spin it. Edit: pretty sure WhatsApp and fb Messenger are encrypted too, but I don't for a second trust fb to not store keys and/or seed numbers
@@anon_y_mousse Yeh, you basically sign your life away and for what? To fight some elitist wanker's pet war, then to get chewed up and spat out by the system (after it has destroyed your mind and/or body) which made big promises at the recruitment desk and is now flat out refusing to make good on them. "Read the fine print, private"... I have enormous respect for all the service members who have to put up with this on top of literal war deployment, but at this point I don't see any upsides. It's not even about defending one's nation any more.
you dont have to trust signal because its open source. companies cant call themselves "private" if they cant prove it. and no, proving doesnt mean bringing in independent specialists to tell me "yea its safe" it means the user can prove it, by showing us the proof right in our faces. the fbi caught criminals with their anom phone because the criminals werent tech-savvy (or savvy at all) enough to know that proprietary software shouldnt be used when you absolutely need privacy, like when doing any sort of crime. (and no, crime doesnt constitute bad. its a crime to advocate human rights against the iranian government. do you think that makes those people bad?)
@@ecodev15 I once encountered an idiot on reddit who believed that gun rights aren't "rights" because the government can just take them away... By his logic I guess there's no right to life either 🤔
this is the case with practically any proprietary software that claims to be "the private choice" i mean, look at anom. a device made to be used by people who care about privacy. the only reason they didnt get caught was because you couldnt inspect what the device was doing and had to trust it wasnt tracking you, which it actually was. they locked it down so hard you couldnt even unlock the bootloaders on these phones. proprietary is never private, and you should always take these claims with a pound of salt until you can inspect the code for yourself.
@@ecodev15 I mean, yea, but its another thing to actually have these confirmed, because as you said, they do not want these things to be confirmed, so they can claim we are just the unwashed masses
You expected privacy *from Apple* when using an Apple *service*??? Seriously? Do people not understand that these are services? of course when you utilize services on Apple’s servers they’re gonna do analytics every which way from Sunday (just like they say they do and that you consented to.) I’m really appalled by the lack of critical thinking that goes on in these outrage brigades.
Yeah the GDPR might become a problem for Apple here. Because it requires you to have an OPT-IN to be tracked (see the many cookie-popups) and if you (as a company) just "track anyway" you can get fined for hundreds of millions.
@@Channel-gz9hm Why this kind of trolling? 🤨 You have never visited Europe for sure, otherwise you would have known better. OTOH: maybe you are still being fed by our uppertroll in the "Kreml" of Moscow. That will not last for long ... he is running out of resources.
as a software engineer, i can say that this is an incredibly normal practice that is done on basically every device, and on every platform you use. i attended a conference at Hulu's HQ recently where they went into detail on how they implemented this same kind of tracking in disney +, espn, Hulu, and their other platforms. This info is typically not connected to advertising to individual users. 99% of the time, it's used to test user engagement with new features to see if the feature makes the platform better or not. They roll out a new feature to x% of the population, then see how people interact with it compared to a control group. Apple definitely should respect the toggle to turn it off if they have one, but the actual information they collect is not that big of a deal imo.
Or (because as you said it is a seemingly standard action) they should clearly label that there is stuff that they will track even if you decline tracking. (Kinda like how websites have the essential cookies that can’t be turned off on the toggles)
@@metalmanexetreme You consented to it wholesale so until if and when they give you a toggle to control it in greater detail (which, honestly, why should they) the services are ‘take it or leave it’. They never gave a toggle to not share this info (nor did they ever imply it for any sharing controls they did give.) You’re seriously going to take the fact that Apple gave controls for some non-identifiable analytics (that never promised not to share identifiable data) *against* them? It’s basically trying to punish Apple for the intersection of a) peoples’ idiocy and b) them making incremental improvements to improve privacy… Giving you an opt out of some sharing doesn’t add some obligation to go label everything with a neon sign that they didn’t let you opt out of.
@@EarthIsNotFlat They literally say we protect your privacy which is the reason people got roped in and after using everything they make are unable to come out
@@davemarinas3259 They do a huge amount to protect your privacy, but that doesn’t mean that they hide absolutely everything about your use of their services from themselves. There’s a reason this study didn’t compare the iPhone app store with other platforms’ (since they all do much, much worse on the privacy front.) They never told or implied to you that they’d protect your privacy in the use of these services of theirs from themselves.
This does not surprise me in the slightest. It isn't going to affect whether I use iOS or not thought. I always assumed that Apple was collecting data on you. If you are using an internet connected device with software that was not created by you, on a network that was not created by you, there is really only so much you can do to protect your privacy these days
I'm not surprised either, however *you're entirely wrong* with your reasoning. There is tons of software that can be trusted; particularly open-source software, free (as in liberated) software, and non-profit software. ISP have laws to follow and a reputation to keep. Whether it's a lot or a little, there's always "only so much" of anything that one can do regarding _ANYTHING at all._ However there are many effective things that can be done for online privacy. Just look at a channel like Naomi Brockwell or Rob Braxman. Yes there are a lot of things that infringe on one's privacy, but they can all be avoided or minimized, so the more privacy invasive stuff that exists, the more that can be done.
@@MsHojat I agree with everything you said, but I am simply saying that if you yourself don't have the skills necessary to code or design all of this stuff, you have to trust someone at some point (including the open source community), or either just not let yourself be too concerned with it. I do certain things to help ensure some privacy in certain areas. For example, I use Signal for messaging and I use a trusted VPN when I am not on my home network. And on my iOS devices I have made use of the "Request Apps Not to Track" features, which I can definitely say has cut way down on the number of "personalized" ads I see, and therefore the data that some companies are sent. But yes, again I agree that if you are willing to put in the time to figure it out, and you are willing to not use iOS devices, there is quite a bit that can be done to to help you have a greater degree of privacy online.
@@Super80sMan it doesnt take a genius to install lineageos/grapheneos/calyxos onto an android phone or install debian/ubuntu/linuxmint on a windows computer. in fact, my 10 year old brother can do it.. the only excuse left is not caring enough to do it. also, reading source code is alot easier than writing source code, and you dont need to be a C++ genius to understand that a specific line of code is sending telemetry or not. (you only need to know very high level stuff about a language and the operating system) because of that, no one in any of these big open source projects wants to get caught sliding in malware into open source software, since it'd be very easy for them to get caught and would happen extremely quickly (there are legal repercussions for these things and most people wouldnt want to get in legal trouble for this when they could make alot more money attacking people in different ways)
@@ecodev15 I wish that was the case but I honestly don’t believe a word of it. When the N S A and Google and Intel and Microsoft/ Apple fund the Linux Kernel, and every sim has a built in spy system, and the Ime and Amd equivalent processor level spyware, everything you just said essentially means literally nothing unless you actually fabricated your own chipset. Did you? No. Did you design the kernel? No? Did you design the network protocol? No. The military did. You just have more time and effort and work for your illusions of freedom and privacy. Apple people just pay money for their illusions. Everyone else either pays time or does not think about it at all. Either way you are being watched as we speak.
That and Apple actually *told you* that they collected that data, got your consent to do so, and then refrained from selling it to anybody outside of Apple, just like they promised, that’s all (in other words did 100% what they said they’d do…)
Also lets point out how this extra data being sent also uses your Mobile data, which mean its uses up more bandwith. The collectively it uses the hardware which declines its life span, then ontopp of that it also drains the battery.
@@Kyrieru It's difficult to establish what is telemetry vs actually needed traffic (if you were to ask all those companies they'd say that all the telemetry they collect is crucial to the function of their services) but there are guesses that anything between 1% and 10% of all internet traffic is actually telemetry data, so it's not really insignificant. And then there's all the extra processing needed to collect all that data...
Generally hardly any data is sent by mobile data network. It will save the data and upload it once it encounters wi-fi. There is a setting that allows this to be the case even more. Also the data can be compressed to a very small amount. Sending location every minute if done optimally would theoretically use like a few kilobytes per day or something. That said, data collection could use more battery energy.
who cares about extra battery consumption when you realize iOS doesnt even disable the radios in your phone when you turn them off anymore. iphones are so bad for privacy its hilarious. do you notice how much battery the radios in phones consume? (especially keeping a connection with cell towers, that can be quite difficult if your in an enclosed building, like a school). when i was forced to use an iphone, i always enabled airplane mode and that saved considerable amounts of battery compared to when i just "turned off" the radios on the phone (airplane mode actually turns them off because otherwise it could be dangerous).
My sense is that most "Privacy and Security" settings on most software these days are like a playschool activity center. Lots of buttons, sliders and things to keep you busy and make you think you're doing something but in reality, nothing meaningful is actually happening.
Ah yes, the old song and dance routine of a big company getting credit from Louis where he thinks it is due, only for them to turn around stab him not that long after! Seriously, this is why I don't give companies credit anymore without a massive disclaimer noting that "as long as it lasts" and "when done as stated" etc. simply because companies lie, a lot, most of the time.
@EcoGranite I don't dislike Apple as I have had good experience with the IPhone 7 I have. Ive had it for 5 years and it is still very competent, however my main device is a Samsung. I think the biggest issue I have with Apple now is this virtue signal grift towards the environment. However, I could just be ignorant on the matter so I want to ask you what it is you dislike about them
I still have my iPhone... 4. It's over 11 years old. Steve Jobs built them to last. Everything I don't want is off. It doesn't spy on me. Family asks me if I want a new one (their previous one, because they're the kind who HAS to get the new, the moment they appear on a TV Ad.) I'm like _"Haha, nope. :D Try again, when its globally outlawed to do what companies are doing today!"_
Haha, go to Settings / General / About / I dont remember I think it is legal or something and there is a toggle for limiting personalized ads which is turned off by default, meaning that ads are not limited, this was on iOS 6.1.2 on an iPhone 4s, check your settings on the iPhone 4, dig through all the options and find that toggle, it is there.
I got a Pixel phone recently solely to use Graphene, and I'm loving it. I also got a friend who was due an upgrade to get one; he was interested in Graphene. He thought it was scary and would be super complex.. And now he uses it everyday
My parents did a trade deal to upgrade our devices recently, where we all got an iPhone 14 Pro Max. Me being the android guy was heavily against it, bent on still using my LG G8 from a company long gone from the phone industry. After being teased enough for being anti Apple and given a sermon on how Apple is infinitely better, I caved and accepted the deal. THREE DAYS later I am writing this comment on it and I can’t express my disappointment with this situation. This has to be illegal on several levels, not limited to the fact they falsely advertise their commitment to your privacy. Thanks for simultaneously confirming my suspicions and ruining my day! (Edit: You didn’t actually ruin my day. Just being dramatic) Cheers
An LG still doesn’t run Graphene OS, if they moved you from an Pixel phone, and then to an iphone that would make sense, but google vs apple has a clear winner. LG G8 is also a phone from 2019 so yes, the iPhone 14 Pro Max would be infinitely better aswell. I’m not Pro Apple but I’m just looking at facts.
thank god i use graphene os you can get a pixel 4 for like 180$ and you got graphene os for anyone stuck with a shitty iphone it works perfectly just a bad battery life i dont play any mobile games so idk how it is there but everything works perfect only bring up the games because pixel 4 is old hardware
Have an old, by today's standards, Moto G Power. The battery life is glorious even after two(?) years. The performance is turning to absolute trash. If I could get Graphene OS on a newer, faster model with the same battery life, I would.
Have recently moved to GrapheneOS from iOS and I love it - I'm never going back !! From what I can see the GrapheneOS team have done an absolutely superb job. I was prepared to compromise a lot to claim back my privacy, but I'm delighted to say I haven't had to at all so far. The project deserves continued support as they offer a very rare gift in this hyper surveillance world. And thanks Louis for highlighting this project. Would love to see an interview with Daniel Micay.
It's exactly as you said: The reason I pay for Apple's prices is because I want more privacy and this makes it worth to spend extra money to me. iPhone is still much more less of a user data grab than Android, but you're right, it's betrayal and the "definition" they use is ridiculous.
In recent years, I think the Apple iPhone prices are better than Android's. The trade-in deals thru Apple may suck but the deals Best Buy and T-Mobile offer seem out of this world to me an Android user. In terms of privacy, I think Google spies more when I use a laptop and their search engine than when I use an android phone. When I've wanted it to spy and find me the nearest Best Buy, it'd think I was in Chicago and not KC where I was. So, why Android? It allowed me to upload a giant music library till they ended Google Play Music. Also, I got used to the Android user interface. No issues moving icons around. Supposedly Apple's better on privacy but then they get caught being hypocrites and they're better cause they did the bad thing later than Google. Well, that doesn't make sense.
@@Eeveewashere Apple iPhone have better prices than Android phones? LOL, stop using drugs before you go on Internet. There is plenty browsers who aren't made by Google and don't track you as much. Then, EU data protection laws come into place when you go to online site, even in UK still, and you can totally opt out of most of tracking(can't opt out of Necessary Cookies though).
TL;DR allowing sideloading actually helps to the user's privacy. Because it's their choice* to stick with the monopoly for convenience but at the cost of spying or adventure yourself looking for alternatives. Apple doesn't even let you TRY.
Watching people’s stock market behavior is really suspicious. Someone is probably taking advantage of all of those data. Also, I’ve seen the UA-cam app recommend videos based on things I’ve said despite never giving UA-cam microphone access (no camera access either). The recommendations had no related search or watch history at all, so it seems clear to me that Apple is lying about some of its app permissions, and Google is being just as creepy as ever. GrapheneOS is the way forward, but I’ve already got my hands full trying to ditch Microsoft by moving to Linux. Even if I wasn’t already working on switching operating systems, I’m not too enthused by the hardware available for GrapheneOS and CalyxOS. Why do phones have to be so ridiculously huge? I want something the size of a 2016 iPhone SE or a UniHertz Atom L, not a tablet masquerading as a phone. At least my iPhone SE is easily replaceable at its $60 eBay price tag, but I clearly pay in other ways.
Apple isn't lying about it's app permissions - they just never stated where they are enabled to what extent. The simple truth is - just like in this video - Apple considers privacy very differently than the average user. For them it is okay to collect data about you; just not in the dev department. This is why the toggles for analytics exist. If you want to share that data with devs, they'll get it. If not, bad for them, but Apple still gets the data. One way or another, it just depends who is allowed to know it and what kind of NDA they've signed. There is no de-Appling an iPhone for a reason. Because there isn't supposed to be a way to escape it.
@@PvtAnonymous I think you might be right about "Apple considers privacy very differently than the average user", but not so sure about the rest. I'd argue Apple's definition of "private data" is data that can identify a specific person. Thus, collecting anonimised data is not in violation of anyone's privacy. Which is also why the court case isn't about privacy violations per se, the whole argument revolves around the claim that the phone's settings leave people with the impression no analytics will be sent, but some are sent anyway. I think it is safe to say they intentionally don't mention anything about identifying information in the court case... They'd have to prove the data being sent can be mapped to specific people to win that argument. I suspect if they could win that argument, they would have made it, but they didn't...
@@XLR8bg It’s actually completely the other way around. The link beneath the switch is pretty clear that the analytics it’s giving you a choice to share or not are those that AREN’T tied to you personally, and you can opt out of them and still use the iOS software. There’s still plenty of data that’s tied to you personally that you agree to share with Apple when you accept things like the Media & Services terms and conditions and that’s exactly what make it fine for them to gather and retain it.
@@EarthIsNotFlat this. Getting telemetry data is mandatory for iOS and Android users and the only 'switch' for that is the ToS. So Apple is doing everything as planned.
@@PvtAnonymous at least on android you can ditch the stock os for something better* on iOS you cannot, your stuck with whatever apple wanted on your device, because at the end you dont really get to do what you want with the device you paid for.** *only on devices with unlockable bootloaders, check your local carrier and manufacturer for restrictions. also only for devices with support for GSI or that have their kernel source code released. this means *most* devices are supported, but not all. **certain iOS devices are vulnerable to the checkm8 exploit, which allows booting unsigned code by bypassing apple's "secureboot" (although because apple devices have very little documentation AND their drivers are all proprietary, getting practically any part of the soc working in a third party operating system can prove to be a major undertaking)
Another interesting thing to cover would be ungoogled-chromium. As we all know, Google Chrome contains lots of trackers and collects sensitive data on anything they can get their hands on. Chromium is the foundation of Google Chrome and although it is opensource it is still technically being run by Google since most of its contributors are working for Google. ungoogled-chromium is a fork of Chromium, similar to Graphene OS for android, which remove everything Google related from Chromium, including trackers and analytics. I’ve been using it for a while and it’s great! Maybe a nice idea to cover in one of your videos if you haven’t already.
no, that just helps the chromium monopoly. at the end its still google in control of the code, and while any spyware they add can be removed, any features they decide to remove (ie. ad blocker support) cannot easily be re-added without considerable effort. so while google cant add spyware, they can remove any features they want from chromium, and in turn nearly any forks of it (unless you want to pour weeks of effort adding those back). better is to promote browsers that arent controlled by big companies, like firefox, because its not very likely that mozilla tries to remove adblocker support or something like that, since they dont care about ads anyways (that isnt their business model).
"I'm not stalking my ex-girlfriend, Mr. Judge. My definition of stalking is different from yours and by my definition, it's not stalking when I track her every move, keep a record of who she talks too, show up at her workplace and stand in front of her bedroom window all night."
The fact that you're still giving Apple the benefit of the doubt, Louis, is both commendable and extremely naive... You should know better after all of these years
Whenever I start a video by Louis, I first like the video and then start seeing it. His videos have been synonymous with cold brutal truth, something very less people care about/want to hear but they don't know what it is costing them. Going great dude.
I'm not surprised. They are forcing their icloud thing on everyone too. That annoying notification that never goes away for it unless I deactivate it but it delete everything on it, why? Why couldn't it work like Google Drive or something?
I keep saying this since forever. We need clear and un-ambiguous regulation that mandates user control over tracking and dishes out huge fines to companies.
@@ecodev15 I have a lot of bad things to say about how EU works but gotta give it to them, that they are one of the very few "governments" able and willing to enforce anti trust laws and consumer protection,
@@Turtle1631991 No. Have you learned nothing from this whole situation? Whoever seems the most welcoming and kind is usually the most oppressive and authoritarian. The EU is literally letting people freeze to death because “green economy stuff”. They literally tax you for the amount it costs a product to be made (vat) and they are planning on shutting peoples power and heat via the smart devices if they decide you don’t deserve it. Into the frying pan into the furnace.
As someone who used iOS 6 for ten years before being forced into iOS 15, I'm more pissed about the bullshit _requirement_ that I let the phone occasionally connect to some Apple server before I'm even allowed to launch third-party applications already installed and previously used on the device. I only found this out because I block a bunch of Apple domains to prevent update-related harassment.
I always saw through Apple's Facade when they were trying to act like they cared about user privacy. A company that big with that much of a walled garden is going to collect this data. They're a massive technology corporation, and like all corporations they're concerned for their bottom line. To say you trust a company with this size to not spy on you is moronic IMO.
They TELL you they’re going to, so of course they do. They never said they weren’t going to use analytics in their own websites (whether accesses in a standard browser or their special App Store one that you can’t use without consenting to it.)
@@EarthIsNotFlat And that's the problem you literally have to use the App Store to use your phone so your forced to give your data no questions asked. They don't even state that all their services you use will take data
@@davemarinas3259 You aren’t though. You can use the iPhone’s built in functionality without using those services. They make it pretty clear what services are covered by the Media & Services terms and conditions (so much so there’s even a separate sign-in and separate terms and conditions acceptance for it.) They also disclose the fact that these services require acceptance of these terms on the box, and make the terms available before the purchase, and take the phone back no questions asked if you disagree with it. There’s really nothing at all wrong with the way they’re running their storefronts. Your issue is with them blocking sideloading and third party app stores. I agree with you actually that’s the abuse of their position and should stop. The fact that they could protect your privacy even more than they do now is really just something to complain about (and not very potent in credible terms given how far ahead of their competition they are in the privacy front coupled with them meeting all of their legal obligations, even the stringent EU and CA ones, regarding privacy.)
I was a windows and Android user and after watching your original video back in 2019 it convinced me to make the switch to Apple. I ditched everything google and windows and spent at least $8k on a new iphone, watch, macbook etc. To hear that all their claims of pro privacy were just marketing BS is pretty discouraging.
I actually think blackberry could come back into the market if they pushed privacy/ security and a pure old school mobile experience with the option for modern smartphone experience
Easy to avoid all this: stop buying and using Apple products 🤷♀ gonna save you a lot of money and trouble. I haven't had one in 12 years, and never will again.
@@chrisdavidson911 Not sure about the OP, but I tend not to hang around people who call me stupid for not doing something they perceive being a smarter option without any data to back that up (and, as it turns out, was incorrect to begin with). Nothing to do with identity...
Thanks for admitting you were wrong. It is not an easy thing to do. Apple should answer honestly. Otherwise, they will lose credibility. I want an open source reliable phone and PC.
I would try Graphine OS, my concern is that some apps or functions, mainly the Camera app or other things that I take for granted, will stop working. This is due largely to a lack of me educating myself on this topic, and instead, deciding to post this when I know that I need to do more research.
There is nothing that GrapheneOS would prevent you to do that you can do on a stock Android if you really want to. As for the Google Camera, to quote myself from another thread, "I find GrapheneOS Camera adequate enough for most situations-and for those times where I'd like to take the full advantage of my Pixel 6 Pro camera and Google's AI algorithms, I have a separate profile that has GSF, Google Camera and Google Gallery (needed for Magic Eraser and such features) installed that I can quickly switch to, take as many pictures as I want, and then logout from it back to my main profile which doesn't run anything Google. Best of both worlds!"
Graphene's camera app is not as good as the Google one but you can install the Google one and get all the functionality. For instance, the graphene camera app does not allow me to record 60 frames per second video. That is a trade-off, but if I want 60 frames per second video I can head over to the Play store and install Google's default pixel camera app and use that just fine if I am willing to deal with privacy compromises
By doing deep packet inspection, you can find out what data is being transferred from your device, even if encrypted (as it's your own device). Now here's the problem. If I published the data extracted my friend's phone (even with consent), apple would sue the hell out of me because I revealed exactly what data is being collected, and by which server (an apple server). As an individual, would anyone want to take on Apple? I don't like it, but in their small print they have a catch all- by using this device, you agree to all apple's T's & C's... yup. They've covered themselves good and proper.
Of course, you can use that knowledge to install an network wide domain blacklist. PiHoles make that job very easy as it can block ads, but it also block tracking. If you have a spare computer, I suggest you get one up and running
Apple wouldn’t nor couldn’t sue you for that. If you read security blogs, they talk about this stuff and show examples all the time. No clue how you came to that conclusion.
Maybe we could use this information as a leverage in the right to repair battle. I mean, how can you compromise security and privacy if Apple already sent everything to their servers anyway XD
no, you couldnt. do you really think security is a relevant argument to right to repair? if we bring up "apple already has bad security" the people lobbying against right to repair will still somehow win every time. guess what? last time they were challenged, they couldnt answer, but does it seem like right to repair has been passed?
@@ecodev15 yes because they keep saying repair shops can't open devices because it "compromises security", my question is: WHAT SECURITY? WTF XD they already sent all the details to themselves, nothing is ever private anymore, I suspected this years ago anyway, this goes for Android and Apple devices - on top of that, the company will not fall if a tech replaces a dead battery in my old iPhone - as a matter of what, I'll do that myself someday soon as it's actually dying XD Edit: I am out of the loop slightly but i think I heard this bill was passed in one state but I could be wrong - I need to catch-up on this stuff but i don't have the time right now.
I don't know if you can explain this with simple greed, the whole business paradigm for so many companies is changing from buying and selling to somehow farming a reoccurring income stream from people whether it's data or subscriptions or what not.
@@paulcarmi8130 I agree, every company has opportunity to be better, but usually when they have constant stream of money from fanatical fanboys who does not demand anything new, they do not have reason for technical progress.
@@M167A1 way easier. Instead of convincing people to buy the next product from you (which they wouldn't if it was perfect in the first place), you just sell them the product once and convince them to subscribe to some service "they can't live without".
it puzzles me why google removes this feature. Is it a power limitation ? thermal design limitation ? knowing google removed Wireless Display (casting) feature from their Nexus devices for no reason (it works after a simple root modification), i'm not giving google the benefit of doubt. Android's Desktop mode would completely cannibalise chromebook sales. Other features that worked fine but were arbitrarily removed : Night Light, and freaking USB tethering
@@YounesLayachi I think google wants people to use there streaming devices that's probably why they don't support usb c to hdmi and google products needs an internet connection like the chrome cast, google home nest devices and chrome books etc. , they all require an internet connection to properly function. I used to have an old htc one m7 and it supported hdmi over micro usb with a micro usb to hdmi cable and I used to play games and watch movies since it would mirror the phone on an external display since the micro usb to hdmi cable would charge the htc one m7 and the older android phones supported micro usb to hdmi and it was called an mhl, I use to have the samsung galaxy note 2 and I would use the samsung dock for the galaxy note 2 and connect it to an external display and use it like a computer and it was my own version of Samsung dex before samsung made dex
To an extent It is not possible to provide some services such as stocks and news without collecting the information on what your watch list is, etc. because the server needs that information to serve a response with the relevant data. This may have been mistaken for analytics.
I get what you are saying but it’s not settings, preferences or App data that is being talked about. Maybe they try and spin this into “server side processing that helps add functionality to Screen Time” or something. The thing that was shocking was the comment about “Analytics” which are the actual files your device records about HOW you have interacted with a certain thing. I usually think of the “Analytics” files containing a list of what files/apps the phone accessed/used at what time. Anyway. I’m with Louis on this: They collect more info than they need. They are not transparent about what they do with it. And they are not transparent about how long hey keep it. It IS attached to a device ID so is it anonymized, used for personalization, or is it info that is utilized by every part of the Apple services ecosystem? And then can we trust that this is not used or sold to ANYONE else?
I'm not in the iOS ecochamber, sorry, ecosystem so I don't know-is Apple providing stock tracking services? Because if it's coming from some other service, Apple has no business into logging/listening to these.
Not an apple fan or product user, I am a software developer and I understand that the developer of the app controls the flow of data and the network requests made. My point was that the stocks app Making requests to apples server may have been how they provide the data and not for analytics. Just pointing out one potential flaw with the study. If it is analytics then it is a shame that they are doing that.
@@zwerko The data is provided by Yahoo, but Apple stores and forwards that data for caching and knowing what alerts to send you. The app wouldn’t work without that data. This video, like a bunch of Louis’s is a bit overblown and click-bait.
Fair point then-if they aggregate/customize the data on their services they obviously need a way to know how to package it for your needs/interests (least they forward you all the stock data and have it filtered out locally but I guess that would be very costly in terms of bandwidth and processing). But then the question is-are they using that data only to provide you the service or are they also capturing it for telemetry sake, and if latter, how much PII can leak via those means. It's probably buried deep in their ToS and privacy policies and, like most companies out there, they are probably not doing a great job of keeping these up to date anyway.
yeah i feel burned. I got an iphone for the first time in years because I heard they were better with privacy than google. Which is still true but as time has past I realize that I can't trust any of these companies. Will probably make the move to Graphine os soon. Was actually considering a macbook as a computer upgrade but might rethink that too
I can recommend a macbook. I use it as my daily driver. It’s a mix between a windows laptop and a linux laptop, and well done. I don’t know about apple’s practices on macbooks but I do appreciate it. It’s very good for software developers and people editing photo/video. That’s my 2 cents. For my phone though, I switched from the s21 ultra to the iphone 13 pro, although I think I am considering switching back. The most limiting factor is that my car only supports carplay and not android auto.
You have to make a choice, good devices or private devices. Chose one. Or buy both. No device whatsoever provides a flawless experience AND actual privacy.
grapheneOS would be supporting more phones if there were any that had sane hardware and software bases. Currently the only ones are the Pixels. Other phone makers add bugs and buggy features and make nonsensical changes to the kernel, have slow or nonexistent security patches , etc
As a developer, I can say that in the applications I've developed, I also collect information about everything the user does, every click, every scroll, every button press. At least in my own applications, this data isn't used for advertising or anything malicious. We use the data to replicate the actions a user took before an error occured, so that we can track software bugs. In complicated software environments, software issues can be extremely hard to track and replicate, and so knowing the whole picture of what the app and user were doing at the moment an error occurred can save thousands of hours of developer time. I'm not saying any of the valid uses for such information justifies ignoring user opt-out preferences, because it really doesn't. But I hope this provides some insight into why this kind of data might be collected, and what it can be used for. Though i'd bet my last dollar apple is trying to use it for advertising too.
I'm running something even more private than GrapheneOS. An old school flip phone that runs such a bare bones AOSP build it cannot even install apps, run an app store, or use data.
I've been an iPhone-only person for a while now... though shit like this is what's making me question if I should start to find a good-enough Android phone to mess around with when the time's up for my current iPhone. I already ditched Windows for Fedora Workstation on my desktop & haven't looked back, would love to try ditching iOS for something like GrapheneOS when Apple decides to kill off support for the current gen iPhone SE. Only reason I'm still hesitant to is just a lack of exactly what I'm looking for as far as devices - seemingly, no manufacturer besides Apple makes a device that checks all my boxes of:
Graphene sounds like a great idea, but is pretty limited to what you could do with low effort, like, not wasting a lot of time trying to do stuff samsung does effortlessly. I have been using samsung for like 10 years now, i love all the extra features i get from my phone, tablet and watch and use them on the daily for studying and entertainment, but i hate how much data they collect. I try to limit the data collection as much as i can by opting out of stuff but i know it's not enough, and I'm kinda getting more lax about it as it is just getting more annoying. Another annoying thing is that the privacy focused hardware and software is on average years behind the current standard.... So it's hard switching to them.
considering the number of red flags you just put on a single comment, i'll give you at minimum 10 years until you start becoming interested in grapheneOS . Seriously, what is the point of forming such strong opinions about something you're totally unfamiliar with
private os? Very, very private!! Hmm! Where have I heard this before?? Always, from all of them, since the browsers . Never, ever would we do this, promise. Do you want privacy, do not go on line.. drop out of every single thing in modern world. Do not go to the doctor, do not get a driver's license. Do not file tax but do not get arrested!
@@YounesLayachi i mean, it's not that i know jack shit about them, i just do not know if it is actually worth all the effort and "sacrifices". google/microsoft/facebook will most probably eventually get info even if i take all precautions, something will slip through the cracks. take for example my uni, they use microsoft sharepoint for everything. those fuckers (microsoft) will not serve you anything on the website if you do not enable ALL cookies. I'm not going to make a virtual machine on all my "private alternative" devices to be able to casually check my schedule or download some lecture material... (i usually use a vpn for what it's worth)
Out of curiosity, what are the things you do on a daily basis that necessities a Samsung device/tracking (+Google tracking) that would take a lot of effort and not be as effortless on GrapheneOS? Short of services that absolutely require sharing data with the 'mothership' (but then why even bother w/ a privacy/security oriented OS if you have desire to use such services) and stuff that requires super-privileged access (only Android Auto comes to mind), I can't think of such a thing.
Is it a bad sign if I like the extensive cat content and ask for more in future videos? Not that I sh1t on privacy but nowadays it out of hand anyways. So instead of being upset with such information I did really enjoy your cat content. Louis, Louis' Team and everyone else reading this... Have a wonderful and enjoyable day
I think the apps mentioned here are not ones we use very often. So yes, it sucks that they are collecting data but it doesn't really matter too much as compared to say UA-cam, Facebook, or TikTok. The App store is well . . . a store and to run it effectively, they need some information about the people using the store. So them collecting some data on the users to use within the store should be okay. Now if they are sharing this info with other companies so these other companies can market their products to us within different apps, that would be a big problem.
Well, do consider a certain category of apps he mentioned which regard ones health. One such type of app would be a woman's period tracker app. Now what if such an app clued in that they possibly had an abortion, and Apple just so conveniently shared this information with the authorities... 🤔 Granted that this is just a hypothetical, but it's a very realistic hypothetical that could actually happen. Bad Apple, bad!
Ok, but the problem is that they give you option to stop sending data to them but even If you use this option they are still sending data. So the point is that they are lying. At least that is what video say because I did not checked. Maybe they are still sending data which was mentioned but they are not sending some other types of data or something like that
@@My_Old_YT_Account There is always a time before and after a company starts collecting some user data to make the experience better for customers. When we open the app store, it is able to show us (recommend) apps that it think we would like. The better it is at doing that, the more satisfied a customer would be. How else do you expect to discover cool new apps? Now of course there must be limits to how much (and what) data is collected, but the type outlined in this video is perfectly fine.
@@Daniel_VolumeDown You're using the App Store, which is an app by Apple on an Apple phone and it's sending some very basic data back to Apple. I don't understand why one would think that that would not happen. Like I said above, this is a store without eisles for us to go through to discover products. So they need a way to market apps to you such that you are able to find what you're looking for and discover new apps at the same time and what they're collecting is extremely basic data. And like I said, it's the App Atore. It's not a social media platform. Personally, I open the App Store maybe twice a month so I don't think it's a big issue.
As an Android user, I’m more concerned about 3rd party data collection (3rd party apps, OEMs, carriers, etc.) than I am 1st party data collection (Google) on the Android Operating System. Google allows its users to manage and control the data it collects, even if you want to use targeted advertising and some of the data Google collects is useful to me. One example is the Google Maps timeline feature, I use this quite often to write down hours I’ve worked if I don’t remember the time I got to a certain location. 3rd party data collection is a scary place, big companies like Facebook, and Amazon gives users less control over the data they collect, 3rd party apps and games often sell user data, and then there are apps like TikTok which, under Chinese law, can be compelled to provide a hostile foreign power data that individually is useless but collectively can compromise the security of other nations.
It’s not protection of your data, it’s monopolization of your data. Why else would they invest money to develop the privacy system, if it doesn’t return any money on the investment?
Its also important to consider apple uses data to train Siri's AI so it can predict what your going to do when you pick your phone up. Not all data collection is totally malicious it would just be cool if users could have the options to opt out of whatever they want instead of Tim apple being the only one with access to that setting.
I literally was forced to go to odyssee/lbry to find this video to be able to copy the link to the article to be able to share it. Otherwise, it would just be contaminated by the google's redirect/percent-encoded junk. Thank you, Louis, for everything you're doing.
I've been telling people for years that no company will leave free money on the table. If they can get away with something, they will. I don't understand why people believe that if Apple makes billions on hardware, they will always respect your privacy. Companies that large do not understand the concept of "enough."
The worst thing that a company/corporation/institution can do is to LIE. Trust cannot be bought and people dont forget. “You reap what you sow”, its a simple yet powerful law of nature.
Clinton got a private jet? Classy Kitty 😺
Clinton is my pet. He'll always lead a charmed life!
@@rossmanngroup 😄 nice
@@rossmanngroup v
@@rossmanngroup z
He's earned it! Singlehandedly funds Louis's life through UA-cam views, likes and donations. The star deserves red carpet treatment.
It was never about protecting users, their goal was to lock out the competition and acquire a monopoly on their users' data.
Exactly! They were looking to put the hurt on Facebooks (meta) bottom line.
True!
Ding ding ding ding! Johnny tell him what he's won!
Heh, in all seriousness, you're correct. These companies want to dominate and control the markets. that's kind of the point of "winning" the competition. You really see a difference btwn Standard Oil and Amazon?
@@anastacioguerrero1527 they didn't actually hurt Facebook. It's all theater. Look up a study called "Effectiveness of Apple's App Tracking Transparency" and come to your own conclusions how effective it really is.
@@PvtAnonymous Just because they didn't actually hurt Facebook doesn't mean they weren't trying to hurt Facebook. You can try and fail.
Apple:
Here are your options:
-Allow tracking (on by default)
-opt out (but we'll still track you)
Here's your choices for graphene os:
- Don't track (default)
- Go out of your way to get tracked anyway (gets bullied by the gOS community)
Apple doesn’t give user an option not to have personally identifiable data gathered by Apple itself when using their services. In fact their privacy policy explicitly says they do gather it. The fact that you get an option to opt out of iOS sharing certain extra NON-identifiable information (when Apple tells you that’s what you’re being given the choice to opt out of) in no way implies you ever had a choice (other than not use the services) with the identify and information they’ve obtained your consent to gather.
@@oldskoolkrazy that's what i meant by having to go out of your way to get tracked
Tim Cook 2015: We believe that people have a fundamental right to privacy. The American people demand it, the constitution demands it, morality demands it.
Tim Cook 2022: Let's increase our ad revenue!
@@LivingLinux Of course they need to have a viable profitable business in order to ‘protect’ anything. Seeing what web page you’re looking at while signed into the app store servers, something you consent to, and which generates data that only Apple can access (and protects per their privacy policy) in no way conflicts with your ‘right to privacy’. You can’t have ‘privacy from Apple itself’ while using their services.
Apple's track record of trying to prove you wrong every time you compliment them holds strong, I see.
@teebles _"I guess we'll go ahead and bribe the regulators to throw those dirty repair techs in jail! After all, repair is tech piracy!"_
Don't knock it - the MPAA did just this. For years, backing up legally-purchased media was an offense punishable by jail. Just read one of those FBI warnings on the old VHS tapes.
Note that the warning says "reproduction" _in addition to_ distribution and exhibition. That's not a typo.
Not really. This is basically a BS clickbait study. The App Store app is basically a glorified web browser. The apps and their descriptions are all on the server. Of course they can see what ‘pages’ are viewed on their server and this was all consented to in the Media & Services terms and conditions (and has virtually nothing to do with the optional iOS analytics that you can turn off if you prefer.) If people didn’t want Apple to see them look at an app then they shouldn’t have agreed to it.
@@EarthIsNotFlat _"The oil barons' contract is basically a glorified slavery agreement. If people didn't want oil companies to steal their land and enslave their children, they shouldn't have agreed to it."_ - Some idiot circa 1900
@@Mavendow Are you implying that you had no other choice but to agree to share that data? Of course you had a choice: don’t use the products and services that require you to share it. They’re totally up front about what you’re agreeing to share. Given that the App Store is little more than a web browser, and Apple runs the servers that deliver the pages it displays, it would in fact be difficult for them NOT to be able to see what app pages you’re looking at. Of course some people are easily led and can’t tell the difference between manufactured outrage and actual abuses (like, for example, weaponizing the law to punish those who reverse engineer DRM) which serves nobodies purpose other than the clickbaiter and leaches who pushed this ‘study’ and suit.
@@Mavendow PS If somebody signed a voluntary contract agreeing to give up their land then nobody ‘stole’ it, they gave it away. If you’re arguing there was no voluntary contract then the specific circumstances would have to be litigated to see, but there can be little doubt that Apple’s privacy policy, that’s right out in the open for anybody to read, and that’s incorporated into the terms that customers agree to to access services like the App Store, is a voluntary contract that one could easily refrain from accepting.
Apples claim of privacy and security is nothing more than marketing.
And literally just false marketing.
And to strangle the competition
I have found that many people seem to perceive the terms “Privacy”, and “Security” to be the same thing when they clearly aren’t.
Viewing these terms interchangeably, and becoming complacent thereafter is a big mistake.
A corporation like Crapple, or Goolag, et al, (should) have the best security models in place, as the function of their business relies on airtight security.
A model with airtight security could allow for privacy, but this is not in the best interest of our corporate overlords…
What good is having billions of people on your networks, if you’re not able to exploit and profit off of them?
Decentralized, anonymous networks, and P2P mesh-nets are the future, where security and privacy don’t have to be mutually exclusive.
They care a lot about privacy and safety. Their's. Not our's.
Everything apple says is marketing. And sheeple still buy their crap.
I just don't understand why dealing under the table like this is the norm when it's proven time and time again that just providing choice and being honest usually wins out. 🙄
Evil cant stop itself from being evil
We are talking about a company that sends an army of lawyers at Hollywood studios if bad guys are shown with apple products. Why are people so surprised.
simple: money/profit
Thing is, it only wins out the tiny percentage of privacy conscious tech savvy people. You gotta acknowledge that we're a minority within a minority. We need to spread awareness to the "normies" On how bad this is and on cybersecurity in general.
Fewer notice if you don't ask. The last thing any of these companies wants, is for people to imagine they have rights to information about themselves.
It is a multi-billion-dollar industry of corporate surveillance, data brokerage, and targeted psychological manipulation. There is no oversight under the table.
Hearing stuff like this just tires me out. I moved away from Android and Windows to MacOS and iOS back in 2017 for privacy reasons and Apple just keeps pushing people like me away. Ads in first-party apps, tracking when I say not to, it is exhausting.
I am seriously considering just using this stuff till it dies then moving to Linux and GrapheneOS. I’m done with giving up my privacy and information for a slightly more convenient user experience. I use Linux on the desktop daily and it is great.
That is the way. If you want it your way you quite much have to set it up yourself! I guess Android with third party firmware wins for now? baseband isn't won yet!
you moved away from android to iOS for privacy?
thats what their marketing does.
if you do a little research, you realize iOS/MacOS is not that much better than a windows computer and an android phone with GMS.
any stock android rom (stock = aosp = only the pure open source android, none of the proprietary google play services) will come with basically no telemetry (minus opt-in telemetry for crash reporting and such). stock android IS private, you dont need fancy grapheneos for privacy. (grapheneos helps you STAY private when using proprietary software, so you dont have to try very hard to stay private when using grapheneos, because the operating system does it all for you, while stock android starts off as private, but as soon as you download any apps your probably bombarded with facebook/firebase/etc trackers)
what made you move to apple's ecosystem? was it based on their (incredibly) deceptive marketing? when i came to these realizations, my instinct was to do research and find what worked best for me, which was lineageos (i would use 3rd party software to try and "mimick" grapheneos's features, because im not going to give up my galaxy s5 for a silly google phone)
@@kidmosey yep, i switched away from my iphone SE to the (older) galaxy s5 for this very reason. (back in 2017)
it is still my daily phone and preforms perfectly fine with lineageos, and is completely free of google spyware because it runs lineageos. (none of the security perks of grapheneos's permissions, but its still miles more private than any iphone or GMS android ever)
Linux freed me. Plus its free
@@anon_y_mousse I distro hopped for a long time but I have most likely found my permanent one in Fedora. Relatively up to date, stable, just works 99% of the time. I used Arch for a while but there was always small issues that would annoy me. I’m mostly no-nonsense. I have some GNOME extensions and kernel modules and that’s all.
At a time of instability and uncertainty in the world still one tradition remains unchanged. Louis eating his words after commending Apple.
with the signature pessimist grin "i'm glad to be proven wrong" xD
“Nom nom nom!”
5:17 I missed directing that at Apple
I think the worst part is the lack of transparency from user to service. Like they have all this data collected that isn’t available to ourselves. For example if I read an article 2 days ago. Apple will have that time stamp on their servers but if I’m trying to figure out which articles I have read specifically the one from 2 days ago, I won’t have any access to it.
@zz zip I wouldn't publish my code because programmers would mock my formatting..
@zz zip or proprietary code that they don't want others to copy, but even that would only encourage competitive development; who can do something the best? secret proprietary code only ensures profitability
@zz zip doesn't it make it harder for hackers to find vulnerabilities?
@@chrisdavidson911 moderately so, but they can find vulnerabilities anyway, then exploit them for longer periods of time since no one but criminals and the handful of privy individuals would be looking at it. In the end it only makes it harder for the honest community members to find and fix.
@zz zip >Not really that hard
I mean, if they open up their source codes and realize it does actually negatively affect their profits, it’s not like they can just make it private again, bc the code’s already out in the wild. tho i suppose they could run a pilot program to check how negatively open source would affect their profits, and go from there
Every horrible thing I theorized apple was doing, continues to become reality.
Worst thing to happen is federals coming at your house after checking your iPhone track record
Yap. I always told my apple friends when they said they turned off tracking "how do you know apple isn't lying?" They always acted like i'm shizophrenic.
@@anonanon3066 turned off tracking on proprietary software 💀
the only way you can know your software isnt lying is when its not proprietary, which ios is.
@@ecodev15 as if android is any better, do you expect every normal person to even know what an progaming code is?? let alone have the skills to actualy dig into android
‘tracking’ the pages on their app store service that you load (off of their servers?) Of course they are, they told you they were, you consented to them doing so, and they never gave you a choice or setting to ‘opt out’ of it. ffs, you’re going to hold the fact that Apple did make some optional stuff opt-out *against* them (because you can’t opt out of everything while still using their service?) That’s just stupid.
God i love corporate overreach
For me not so much that Apple collects the data, rather they claim they don’t, offer controls that preclude the collection, and bypass all this and do it anyway. I am thankful for the folks who have the skill set no time to look into and find crap like this. Hats off.
Man, I used to be such a big Apple fan way back when the first iMac came out, and even to this day I still think that is the single best computer I've ever used, but modern day Apple scares me. It's every bit as evil as Google or Meta, and yet it's the only company that still insists on pretending they care about the user despite how transparently false that is.
I'm similar. They are more visually repulsive
now too.
So long as people have a memory that lasts one day tops...........why wouldn't they do it? Look how long it took you to come to terms what was always obvious? lol.
@@MrBottlecapBill Twenty years ago, people who weren't very political seemed to expect mainstream companies not to commit criminal acts against customers. That seemed more like the domain of shady operations that got shut down. There was an expectation of basic law and order at least among normies. People were pumped for their free GMail accounts because it was just free shit. Americans seemed to share basic freedom and independence-oriented values twenty years ago. Alex Jones was just a vague eccentric character, not someone with any special insight. You should have gloated about how obvious it was back then so you'd have convinced people before our social credit scores were being passed between Apple and the various governments.
The issue is no one is willing to live without their smartphone because they care more about convenience. Switch to an old flip, brick or slide phone - complete privacy when they don’t have the apps or settings in the first place.
@@Spazza42 Except the actually old flip phones don't work in most first world countries as those networks have been switched off. In addition the new "old" flip phones that work on the 4G network usually use a simplified android build and most have facebook preloaded. Only GrapheneOS, LineageOS and the Linux phone can truly save you if are willing to put up with any shortcomings.
More than likely what's going on is they're changing the definition of "privacy" legally to exclude the option of outing out of data collection in any way, shape, or form. To these companies, "privacy" means turning off "relevant ads." It's like seeing "natural flavor" and "no artificial flavors" on the food you eat.
If the data collected doesn’t have any personal identifiers, what privacy was invaded?
It does have
@@clarkesuperman The data is attached to an "anonymized" profile, but remains grouped. Correlating data from multiple sources, the anonymity is removed. This is the foundation of the data brokering industry. They are using a loophole to claim it is anonymous, but rely on the opposite being true for the data to have value. Truly randomized data would have little value, for the purpose of targeted manipulation.
@@Nullpersona you explained it the best
@@fabioc9142 It does have, just like everyone consented to when they signed up to use the *services* involved. Does nobody understand the difference between a product and a service? Of course they can see what you do on their services.
I used to trust Apple and still use a MacBook for work and an iPad for streaming. Your video about GrapheneOS made me switch over - it's been over a month now and I had zero regrets before watching this video. Now, it's even less. Privacy is just not compatible with corporations.
It is when software firmware and drivers are open source along with government regulations on data collection. raw android doesn't have tracking that you can't remove. You just gotta get rid of the proprietary Google apps.
Can I just ask you about GrapheneOS real quick? You've had no problems sending texts or receiving calls? How about the camera, because Pixel has their own dedicated camera app that uses AI technology and stuff to enhance images. is that missing from GrapheneOS?
@@friendofp.24 SMS and calls work fine. I installed the Google Camera App - yes, I use Play services, but with restricted permissions. Don't know about the AI stuff, I revoked network permissions for the camera app and usually AI is far from privacy focused, I guess.
@@JanStraube Alright. One day I'll switch, likely when Google stops supporting my 5a.
@@friendofp.24 Why would he have issues with texts or calls? Even eSIMs work but you need to install (sandboxed) GSF to install an eSIM after which you can uninstall GSF. As for Google Camera, I find GrapheneOS Camera adequate enough for most situations-and for those times where I'd like to take the full advantage of my Pixel 6 Pro camera and Google's AI algorithms, I have a separate profile that has GSF, Google Camera and Google Gallery (needed for Magic Eraser and such features) installed that I can quickly switch to, take as many pictures as I want, and then logout from it back to my main profile which doesn't run anything Google. Best of both worlds!
Thank you for taking such good sponsorships. Keeping up to date with all of this BS can be very depressing and seeing a cute cat at the end helps keep me watching until the end.
louis is a shill for clinton because of the amount of money clinton brings to the channel.
This is where I quite like Signal. Iirc, they were once legally compelled by the courts & FBI to hand over "all" the data they held for a particular user. The FBI got what they wanted in the end, but it wasn't what they expected and I'd argue it was hardly worth the bother.
Literally, the unix time of the account's creation. Unformatted. 🤣🤣🤣
I've convinced my boyfriend to text me using Signal. Makes me feel a lot better about our communications since, otherwise, everything is completely unencrypted (as far as I know). The sad thing is that if the government thinks that something suspicious is going on between the two of us, there is nothing stopping them from seeing what we've sent each other because he is in the military and doesn't really have a choice.
@@eliseosterbrink8000 You have a right to privacy. Exercising said right cannot reasonably be deemed "suspicious" by any of these bureaucrats, no matter how many ways they try to spin it.
Edit: pretty sure WhatsApp and fb Messenger are encrypted too, but I don't for a second trust fb to not store keys and/or seed numbers
@@anon_y_mousse Yeh, you basically sign your life away and for what? To fight some elitist wanker's pet war, then to get chewed up and spat out by the system (after it has destroyed your mind and/or body) which made big promises at the recruitment desk and is now flat out refusing to make good on them. "Read the fine print, private"...
I have enormous respect for all the service members who have to put up with this on top of literal war deployment, but at this point I don't see any upsides. It's not even about defending one's nation any more.
you dont have to trust signal because its open source.
companies cant call themselves "private" if they cant prove it.
and no, proving doesnt mean bringing in independent specialists to tell me "yea its safe"
it means the user can prove it, by showing us the proof right in our faces.
the fbi caught criminals with their anom phone because the criminals werent tech-savvy (or savvy at all) enough to know that proprietary software shouldnt be used when you absolutely need privacy, like when doing any sort of crime. (and no, crime doesnt constitute bad. its a crime to advocate human rights against the iranian government. do you think that makes those people bad?)
@@ecodev15 I once encountered an idiot on reddit who believed that gun rights aren't "rights" because the government can just take them away... By his logic I guess there's no right to life either 🤔
Well, there goes their entire privacy and security argument
I must say, i expected that this was the case, cant say im surprised
this is the case with practically any proprietary software that claims to be "the private choice"
i mean, look at anom. a device made to be used by people who care about privacy.
the only reason they didnt get caught was because you couldnt inspect what the device was doing and had to trust it wasnt tracking you, which it actually was. they locked it down so hard you couldnt even unlock the bootloaders on these phones.
proprietary is never private, and you should always take these claims with a pound of salt until you can inspect the code for yourself.
@@ecodev15 I mean, yea, but its another thing to actually have these confirmed, because as you said, they do not want these things to be confirmed, so they can claim we are just the unwashed masses
You expected privacy *from Apple* when using an Apple *service*??? Seriously? Do people not understand that these are services? of course when you utilize services on Apple’s servers they’re gonna do analytics every which way from Sunday (just like they say they do and that you consented to.) I’m really appalled by the lack of critical thinking that goes on in these outrage brigades.
@@EarthIsNotFlat As i said earlier, its one thing to know that they are probably doing it, its another to actually have it be confirmed
@@nemtudom5074 They told you they did it. It was never hidden.
Wondering what EU has to say about this. They carry a bit more clout than the EFF, ACLU, etc.
They are probably the ones who asked for the tracking
The EU is less cohesive than it appears. France doesn't really like a Germany that strong arms everything, and everyone is suspicious of Brussels
Yeah the GDPR might become a problem for Apple here. Because it requires you to have an OPT-IN to be tracked (see the many cookie-popups) and if you (as a company) just "track anyway" you can get fined for hundreds of millions.
Nothing. You have to agree to this to use the App Store.
@@Channel-gz9hm Why this kind of trolling? 🤨 You have never visited Europe for sure, otherwise you would have known better. OTOH: maybe you are still being fed by our uppertroll in the "Kreml" of Moscow. That will not last for long ... he is running out of resources.
as a software engineer, i can say that this is an incredibly normal practice that is done on basically every device, and on every platform you use. i attended a conference at Hulu's HQ recently where they went into detail on how they implemented this same kind of tracking in disney +, espn, Hulu, and their other platforms. This info is typically not connected to advertising to individual users. 99% of the time, it's used to test user engagement with new features to see if the feature makes the platform better or not. They roll out a new feature to x% of the population, then see how people interact with it compared to a control group.
Apple definitely should respect the toggle to turn it off if they have one, but the actual information they collect is not that big of a deal imo.
Or (because as you said it is a seemingly standard action) they should clearly label that there is stuff that they will track even if you decline tracking. (Kinda like how websites have the essential cookies that can’t be turned off on the toggles)
@@metalmanexetreme You consented to it wholesale so until if and when they give you a toggle to control it in greater detail (which, honestly, why should they) the services are ‘take it or leave it’. They never gave a toggle to not share this info (nor did they ever imply it for any sharing controls they did give.)
You’re seriously going to take the fact that Apple gave controls for some non-identifiable analytics (that never promised not to share identifiable data) *against* them? It’s basically trying to punish Apple for the intersection of a) peoples’ idiocy and b) them making incremental improvements to improve privacy… Giving you an opt out of some sharing doesn’t add some obligation to go label everything with a neon sign that they didn’t let you opt out of.
@@EarthIsNotFlat They literally say we protect your privacy which is the reason people got roped in and after using everything they make are unable to come out
@@davemarinas3259 They do a huge amount to protect your privacy, but that doesn’t mean that they hide absolutely everything about your use of their services from themselves. There’s a reason this study didn’t compare the iPhone app store with other platforms’ (since they all do much, much worse on the privacy front.) They never told or implied to you that they’d protect your privacy in the use of these services of theirs from themselves.
This does not surprise me in the slightest. It isn't going to affect whether I use iOS or not thought. I always assumed that Apple was collecting data on you. If you are using an internet connected device with software that was not created by you, on a network that was not created by you, there is really only so much you can do to protect your privacy these days
I'm not surprised either, however *you're entirely wrong* with your reasoning. There is tons of software that can be trusted; particularly open-source software, free (as in liberated) software, and non-profit software. ISP have laws to follow and a reputation to keep.
Whether it's a lot or a little, there's always "only so much" of anything that one can do regarding _ANYTHING at all._ However there are many effective things that can be done for online privacy. Just look at a channel like Naomi Brockwell or Rob Braxman. Yes there are a lot of things that infringe on one's privacy, but they can all be avoided or minimized, so the more privacy invasive stuff that exists, the more that can be done.
@@MsHojat I agree with everything you said, but I am simply saying that if you yourself don't have the skills necessary to code or design all of this stuff, you have to trust someone at some point (including the open source community), or either just not let yourself be too concerned with it.
I do certain things to help ensure some privacy in certain areas. For example, I use Signal for messaging and I use a trusted VPN when I am not on my home network. And on my iOS devices I have made use of the "Request Apps Not to Track" features, which I can definitely say has cut way down on the number of "personalized" ads I see, and therefore the data that some companies are sent.
But yes, again I agree that if you are willing to put in the time to figure it out, and you are willing to not use iOS devices, there is quite a bit that can be done to to help you have a greater degree of privacy online.
@@Super80sMan it doesnt take a genius to install lineageos/grapheneos/calyxos onto an android phone or install debian/ubuntu/linuxmint on a windows computer.
in fact, my 10 year old brother can do it..
the only excuse left is not caring enough to do it.
also, reading source code is alot easier than writing source code, and you dont need to be a C++ genius to understand that a specific line of code is sending telemetry or not. (you only need to know very high level stuff about a language and the operating system)
because of that, no one in any of these big open source projects wants to get caught sliding in malware into open source software, since it'd be very easy for them to get caught and would happen extremely quickly (there are legal repercussions for these things and most people wouldnt want to get in legal trouble for this when they could make alot more money attacking people in different ways)
@@ecodev15 I wish that was the case but I honestly don’t believe a word of it. When the N S A and Google and Intel and Microsoft/ Apple fund the Linux Kernel, and every sim has a built in spy system, and the Ime and Amd equivalent processor level spyware, everything you just said essentially means literally nothing unless you actually fabricated your own chipset. Did you? No. Did you design the kernel? No? Did you design the network protocol? No. The military did. You just have more time and effort and work for your illusions of freedom and privacy. Apple people just pay money for their illusions. Everyone else either pays time or does not think about it at all. Either way you are being watched as we speak.
That and Apple actually *told you* that they collected that data, got your consent to do so, and then refrained from selling it to anybody outside of Apple, just like they promised, that’s all (in other words did 100% what they said they’d do…)
Also lets point out how this extra data being sent also uses your Mobile data, which mean its uses up more bandwith.
The collectively it uses the hardware which declines its life span, then ontopp of that it also drains the battery.
I'm assuming that the data would be too small to be significant. Probably less than 1mb.
@@Kyrieru It's difficult to establish what is telemetry vs actually needed traffic (if you were to ask all those companies they'd say that all the telemetry they collect is crucial to the function of their services) but there are guesses that anything between 1% and 10% of all internet traffic is actually telemetry data, so it's not really insignificant. And then there's all the extra processing needed to collect all that data...
Generally hardly any data is sent by mobile data network. It will save the data and upload it once it encounters wi-fi. There is a setting that allows this to be the case even more. Also the data can be compressed to a very small amount. Sending location every minute if done optimally would theoretically use like a few kilobytes per day or something.
That said, data collection could use more battery energy.
who cares about extra battery consumption when you realize iOS doesnt even disable the radios in your phone when you turn them off anymore.
iphones are so bad for privacy its hilarious.
do you notice how much battery the radios in phones consume? (especially keeping a connection with cell towers, that can be quite difficult if your in an enclosed building, like a school).
when i was forced to use an iphone, i always enabled airplane mode and that saved considerable amounts of battery compared to when i just "turned off" the radios on the phone (airplane mode actually turns them off because otherwise it could be dangerous).
My sense is that most "Privacy and Security" settings on most software these days are like a playschool activity center. Lots of buttons, sliders and things to keep you busy and make you think you're doing something but in reality, nothing meaningful is actually happening.
Ah yes, the old song and dance routine of a big company getting credit from Louis where he thinks it is due, only for them to turn around stab him not that long after!
Seriously, this is why I don't give companies credit anymore without a massive disclaimer noting that "as long as it lasts" and "when done as stated" etc. simply because companies lie, a lot, most of the time.
i could see this from mars.
1: its proprietary software claiming its private (always a red flag that glows)
2: its apple (💀)
@EcoGranite I don't dislike Apple as I have had good experience with the IPhone 7 I have. Ive had it for 5 years and it is still very competent, however my main device is a Samsung. I think the biggest issue I have with Apple now is this virtue signal grift towards the environment. However, I could just be ignorant on the matter so I want to ask you what it is you dislike about them
I still have my iPhone... 4.
It's over 11 years old. Steve Jobs built them to last. Everything I don't want is off. It doesn't spy on me. Family asks me if I want a new one (their previous one, because they're the kind who HAS to get the new, the moment they appear on a TV Ad.) I'm like _"Haha, nope. :D Try again, when its globally outlawed to do what companies are doing today!"_
Haha, go to Settings / General / About / I dont remember I think it is legal or something and there is a toggle for limiting personalized ads which is turned off by default, meaning that ads are not limited, this was on iOS 6.1.2 on an iPhone 4s, check your settings on the iPhone 4, dig through all the options and find that toggle, it is there.
I got a Pixel phone recently solely to use Graphene, and I'm loving it. I also got a friend who was due an upgrade to get one; he was interested in Graphene. He thought it was scary and would be super complex.. And now he uses it everyday
My parents did a trade deal to upgrade our devices recently, where we all got an iPhone 14 Pro Max. Me being the android guy was heavily against it, bent on still using my LG G8 from a company long gone from the phone industry.
After being teased enough for being anti Apple and given a sermon on how Apple is infinitely better, I caved and accepted the deal.
THREE DAYS later I am writing this comment on it and I can’t express my disappointment with this situation. This has to be illegal on several levels, not limited to the fact they falsely advertise their commitment to your privacy. Thanks for simultaneously confirming my suspicions and ruining my day! (Edit: You didn’t actually ruin my day. Just being dramatic) Cheers
more power to you, i would hate being in your situation
An LG still doesn’t run Graphene OS, if they moved you from an Pixel phone, and then to an iphone that would make sense, but google vs apple has a clear winner. LG G8 is also a phone from 2019 so yes, the iPhone 14 Pro Max would be infinitely better aswell.
I’m not Pro Apple but I’m just looking at facts.
thank god i use graphene os you can get a pixel 4 for like 180$ and you got graphene os for anyone stuck with a shitty iphone it works perfectly just a bad battery life i dont play any mobile games so idk how it is there but everything works perfect only bring up the games because pixel 4 is old hardware
I love GrapheneOS. It's the only phone OS I currently use, or plan to into the future.
@@rossmanngroup same here
@@rossmanngroup I plan to switch, but the battery life is something I’d be concerned about
it's fine
Have an old, by today's standards, Moto G Power. The battery life is glorious even after two(?) years. The performance is turning to absolute trash. If I could get Graphene OS on a newer, faster model with the same battery life, I would.
Have recently moved to GrapheneOS from iOS and I love it - I'm never going back !! From what I can see the GrapheneOS team have done an absolutely superb job. I was prepared to compromise a lot to claim back my privacy, but I'm delighted to say I haven't had to at all so far. The project deserves continued support as they offer a very rare gift in this hyper surveillance world. And thanks Louis for highlighting this project. Would love to see an interview with Daniel Micay.
It's exactly as you said: The reason I pay for Apple's prices is because I want more privacy and this makes it worth to spend extra money to me.
iPhone is still much more less of a user data grab than Android, but you're right, it's betrayal and the "definition" they use is ridiculous.
In recent years, I think the Apple iPhone prices are better than Android's. The trade-in deals thru Apple may suck but the deals Best Buy and T-Mobile offer seem out of this world to me an Android user. In terms of privacy, I think Google spies more when I use a laptop and their search engine than when I use an android phone. When I've wanted it to spy and find me the nearest Best Buy, it'd think I was in Chicago and not KC where I was. So, why Android? It allowed me to upload a giant music library till they ended Google Play Music. Also, I got used to the Android user interface. No issues moving icons around. Supposedly Apple's better on privacy but then they get caught being hypocrites and they're better cause they did the bad thing later than Google. Well, that doesn't make sense.
@@Eeveewashere
Apple iPhone have better prices than Android phones? LOL, stop using drugs before you go on Internet.
There is plenty browsers who aren't made by Google and don't track you as much. Then, EU data protection laws come into place when you go to online site, even in UK still, and you can totally opt out of most of tracking(can't opt out of Necessary Cookies though).
TL;DR allowing sideloading actually helps to the user's privacy. Because it's their choice* to stick with the monopoly for convenience but at the cost of spying or adventure yourself looking for alternatives.
Apple doesn't even let you TRY.
Watching people’s stock market behavior is really suspicious. Someone is probably taking advantage of all of those data.
Also, I’ve seen the UA-cam app recommend videos based on things I’ve said despite never giving UA-cam microphone access (no camera access either). The recommendations had no related search or watch history at all, so it seems clear to me that Apple is lying about some of its app permissions, and Google is being just as creepy as ever.
GrapheneOS is the way forward, but I’ve already got my hands full trying to ditch Microsoft by moving to Linux. Even if I wasn’t already working on switching operating systems, I’m not too enthused by the hardware available for GrapheneOS and CalyxOS. Why do phones have to be so ridiculously huge? I want something the size of a 2016 iPhone SE or a UniHertz Atom L, not a tablet masquerading as a phone. At least my iPhone SE is easily replaceable at its $60 eBay price tag, but I clearly pay in other ways.
Apple isn't lying about it's app permissions - they just never stated where they are enabled to what extent. The simple truth is - just like in this video - Apple considers privacy very differently than the average user. For them it is okay to collect data about you; just not in the dev department. This is why the toggles for analytics exist. If you want to share that data with devs, they'll get it. If not, bad for them, but Apple still gets the data. One way or another, it just depends who is allowed to know it and what kind of NDA they've signed. There is no de-Appling an iPhone for a reason. Because there isn't supposed to be a way to escape it.
@@PvtAnonymous I think you might be right about "Apple considers privacy very differently than the average user", but not so sure about the rest. I'd argue Apple's definition of "private data" is data that can identify a specific person. Thus, collecting anonimised data is not in violation of anyone's privacy. Which is also why the court case isn't about privacy violations per se, the whole argument revolves around the claim that the phone's settings leave people with the impression no analytics will be sent, but some are sent anyway. I think it is safe to say they intentionally don't mention anything about identifying information in the court case... They'd have to prove the data being sent can be mapped to specific people to win that argument. I suspect if they could win that argument, they would have made it, but they didn't...
@@XLR8bg It’s actually completely the other way around. The link beneath the switch is pretty clear that the analytics it’s giving you a choice to share or not are those that AREN’T tied to you personally, and you can opt out of them and still use the iOS software. There’s still plenty of data that’s tied to you personally that you agree to share with Apple when you accept things like the Media & Services terms and conditions and that’s exactly what make it fine for them to gather and retain it.
@@EarthIsNotFlat this. Getting telemetry data is mandatory for iOS and Android users and the only 'switch' for that is the ToS. So Apple is doing everything as planned.
@@PvtAnonymous at least on android you can ditch the stock os for something better*
on iOS you cannot, your stuck with whatever apple wanted on your device, because at the end you dont really get to do what you want with the device you paid for.**
*only on devices with unlockable bootloaders, check your local carrier and manufacturer for restrictions. also only for devices with support for GSI or that have their kernel source code released. this means *most* devices are supported, but not all.
**certain iOS devices are vulnerable to the checkm8 exploit, which allows booting unsigned code by bypassing apple's "secureboot" (although because apple devices have very little documentation AND their drivers are all proprietary, getting practically any part of the soc working in a third party operating system can prove to be a major undertaking)
Privacy is a human right
Another interesting thing to cover would be ungoogled-chromium. As we all know, Google Chrome contains lots of trackers and collects sensitive data on anything they can get their hands on. Chromium is the foundation of Google Chrome and although it is opensource it is still technically being run by Google since most of its contributors are working for Google. ungoogled-chromium is a fork of Chromium, similar to Graphene OS for android, which remove everything Google related from Chromium, including trackers and analytics. I’ve been using it for a while and it’s great! Maybe a nice idea to cover in one of your videos if you haven’t already.
no, that just helps the chromium monopoly.
at the end its still google in control of the code, and while any spyware they add can be removed, any features they decide to remove (ie. ad blocker support) cannot easily be re-added without considerable effort. so while google cant add spyware, they can remove any features they want from chromium, and in turn nearly any forks of it (unless you want to pour weeks of effort adding those back).
better is to promote browsers that arent controlled by big companies, like firefox, because its not very likely that mozilla tries to remove adblocker support or something like that, since they dont care about ads anyways (that isnt their business model).
@@ecodev15 Turns out that Firefox also tracks analytics without explicit user approval
"I'm not stalking my ex-girlfriend, Mr. Judge.
My definition of stalking is different from yours and by my definition, it's not stalking when I track her every move, keep a record of who she talks too, show up at her workplace and stand in front of her bedroom window all night."
The fact that you're still giving Apple the benefit of the doubt, Louis, is both commendable and extremely naive... You should know better after all of these years
Whenever I start a video by Louis, I first like the video and then start seeing it. His videos have been synonymous with cold brutal truth, something very less people care about/want to hear but they don't know what it is costing them. Going great dude.
I'm not surprised.
They are forcing their icloud thing on everyone too. That annoying notification that never goes away for it unless I deactivate it but it delete everything on it, why? Why couldn't it work like Google Drive or something?
I always knew those commercials were lying.
Louis!!!! Love you brother!
And screw apple.
Just got disappointed with Apple iOS. Now, the last reason for buying an iPhone is gone. Thank you, I did learn something today.
I keep saying this since forever. We need clear and un-ambiguous regulation that mandates user control over tracking and dishes out huge fines to companies.
europe is the only place we can trust to add this law.
they're already making apple uncomfortable constantly...
@@ecodev15 I have a lot of bad things to say about how EU works but gotta give it to them, that they are one of the very few "governments" able and willing to enforce anti trust laws and consumer protection,
@@Turtle1631991 No. Have you learned nothing from this whole situation? Whoever seems the most welcoming and kind is usually the most oppressive and authoritarian. The EU is literally letting people freeze to death because “green economy stuff”. They literally tax you for the amount it costs a product to be made (vat) and they are planning on shutting peoples power and heat via the smart devices if they decide you don’t deserve it. Into the frying pan into the furnace.
As someone who used iOS 6 for ten years before being forced into iOS 15, I'm more pissed about the bullshit _requirement_ that I let the phone occasionally connect to some Apple server before I'm even allowed to launch third-party applications already installed and previously used on the device. I only found this out because I block a bunch of Apple domains to prevent update-related harassment.
"We believe that privacy is a human right."
-Apple's virtue signal during new Mac setup
"We believe that privacy is a human right.
Too bad we don't believe in human rights."
*Privacy from everyone except Apple
I always saw through Apple's Facade when they were trying to act like they cared about user privacy. A company that big with that much of a walled garden is going to collect this data. They're a massive technology corporation, and like all corporations they're concerned for their bottom line. To say you trust a company with this size to not spy on you is moronic IMO.
They TELL you they’re going to, so of course they do. They never said they weren’t going to use analytics in their own websites (whether accesses in a standard browser or their special App Store one that you can’t use without consenting to it.)
@@EarthIsNotFlat And that's the problem you literally have to use the App Store to use your phone so your forced to give your data no questions asked. They don't even state that all their services you use will take data
@@davemarinas3259 You aren’t though. You can use the iPhone’s built in functionality without using those services. They make it pretty clear what services are covered by the Media & Services terms and conditions (so much so there’s even a separate sign-in and separate terms and conditions acceptance for it.) They also disclose the fact that these services require acceptance of these terms on the box, and make the terms available before the purchase, and take the phone back no questions asked if you disagree with it.
There’s really nothing at all wrong with the way they’re running their storefronts. Your issue is with them blocking sideloading and third party app stores. I agree with you actually that’s the abuse of their position and should stop. The fact that they could protect your privacy even more than they do now is really just something to complain about (and not very potent in credible terms given how far ahead of their competition they are in the privacy front coupled with them meeting all of their legal obligations, even the stringent EU and CA ones, regarding privacy.)
I was a windows and Android user and after watching your original video back in 2019 it convinced me to make the switch to Apple. I ditched everything google and windows and spent at least $8k on a new iphone, watch, macbook etc. To hear that all their claims of pro privacy were just marketing BS is pretty discouraging.
I actually think blackberry could come back into the market if they pushed privacy/ security and a pure old school mobile experience with the option for modern smartphone experience
Easy to avoid all this: stop buying and using Apple products 🤷♀ gonna save you a lot of money and trouble. I haven't had one in 12 years, and never will again.
I remember my friend telling me that I'm stupid for not buying apple to protect my privacy.
He is no longer my friend.
I mean hes allowed to be wrong?
your phone really makes up that much of your identity?
@@chrisdavidson911 Not sure about the OP, but I tend not to hang around people who call me stupid for not doing something they perceive being a smarter option without any data to back that up (and, as it turns out, was incorrect to begin with). Nothing to do with identity...
@@chrisdavidson911 Very witty, you don't have many friends do you?
@@zwerko you can't handle criticism? sounds fun
Thanks for admitting you were wrong. It is not an easy thing to do.
Apple should answer honestly. Otherwise, they will lose credibility.
I want an open source reliable phone and PC.
I would try Graphine OS, my concern is that some apps or functions, mainly the Camera app or other things that I take for granted, will stop working. This is due largely to a lack of me educating myself on this topic, and instead, deciding to post this when I know that I need to do more research.
There is nothing that GrapheneOS would prevent you to do that you can do on a stock Android if you really want to. As for the Google Camera, to quote myself from another thread, "I find GrapheneOS Camera adequate enough for most situations-and for those times where I'd like to take the full advantage of my Pixel 6 Pro camera and Google's AI algorithms, I have a separate profile that has GSF, Google Camera and Google Gallery (needed for Magic Eraser and such features) installed that I can quickly switch to, take as many pictures as I want, and then logout from it back to my main profile which doesn't run anything Google. Best of both worlds!"
Graphene's camera app is not as good as the Google one but you can install the Google one and get all the functionality. For instance, the graphene camera app does not allow me to record 60 frames per second video. That is a trade-off, but if I want 60 frames per second video I can head over to the Play store and install Google's default pixel camera app and use that just fine if I am willing to deal with privacy compromises
There should be an option of "I don't want to share a byte of data"
By doing deep packet inspection, you can find out what data is being transferred from your device, even if encrypted (as it's your own device).
Now here's the problem. If I published the data extracted my friend's phone (even with consent), apple would sue the hell out of me because I revealed exactly what data is being collected, and by which server (an apple server).
As an individual, would anyone want to take on Apple? I don't like it, but in their small print they have a catch all- by using this device, you agree to all apple's T's & C's... yup. They've covered themselves good and proper.
Of course, you can use that knowledge to install an network wide domain blacklist. PiHoles make that job very easy as it can block ads, but it also block tracking. If you have a spare computer, I suggest you get one up and running
Apple wouldn’t nor couldn’t sue you for that. If you read security blogs, they talk about this stuff and show examples all the time. No clue how you came to that conclusion.
The “move to your own country type of guy” 💀
Maybe we could use this information as a leverage in the right to repair battle. I mean, how can you compromise security and privacy if Apple already sent everything to their servers anyway XD
no, you couldnt.
do you really think security is a relevant argument to right to repair? if we bring up "apple already has bad security" the people lobbying against right to repair will still somehow win every time.
guess what? last time they were challenged, they couldnt answer, but does it seem like right to repair has been passed?
@@ecodev15 yes because they keep saying repair shops can't open devices because it "compromises security", my question is: WHAT SECURITY? WTF XD they already sent all the details to themselves, nothing is ever private anymore, I suspected this years ago anyway, this goes for Android and Apple devices - on top of that, the company will not fall if a tech replaces a dead battery in my old iPhone - as a matter of what, I'll do that myself someday soon as it's actually dying XD
Edit: I am out of the loop slightly but i think I heard this bill was passed in one state but I could be wrong - I need to catch-up on this stuff but i don't have the time right now.
I'm sick of them all, can't trust anyone these days bar mate!
Apple can be better,but they are too money hungry
I don't know if you can explain this with simple greed, the whole business paradigm for so many companies is changing from buying and selling to somehow farming a reoccurring income stream from people whether it's data or subscriptions or what not.
Naah, you just been fooled by marketing that Apple is somehow different than other corporation
@@Feefa99 what he said was true. They CAN be better, they just won’t.
@@paulcarmi8130 I agree, every company has opportunity to be better, but usually when they have constant stream of money from fanatical fanboys who does not demand anything new, they do not have reason for technical progress.
@@M167A1 way easier. Instead of convincing people to buy the next product from you (which they wouldn't if it was perfect in the first place), you just sell them the product once and convince them to subscribe to some service "they can't live without".
iPhones 13 Pro Max user here. Woah 😳 all them privacy issues, & freaked out cats on a plane 🐈⬛ ✈️😂
My next phone will be GraphineOS, but pixel really needs to impliment hdmi over usb-c.
it puzzles me why google removes this feature. Is it a power limitation ? thermal design limitation ?
knowing google removed Wireless Display (casting) feature from their Nexus devices for no reason (it works after a simple root modification), i'm not giving google the benefit of doubt.
Android's Desktop mode would completely cannibalise chromebook sales.
Other features that worked fine but were arbitrarily removed : Night Light, and freaking USB tethering
@@YounesLayachi google recently canned their in house chrome book production so at this point it truely would not matter.
@@YounesLayachi I think google wants people to use there streaming devices that's probably why they don't support usb c to hdmi and google products needs an internet connection like the chrome cast, google home nest devices and chrome books etc. , they all require an internet connection to properly function. I used to have an old htc one m7 and it supported hdmi over micro usb with a micro usb to hdmi cable and I used to play games and watch movies since it would mirror the phone on an external display since the micro usb to hdmi cable would charge the htc one m7 and the older android phones supported micro usb to hdmi and it was called an mhl, I use to have the samsung galaxy note 2 and I would use the samsung dock for the galaxy note 2 and connect it to an external display and use it like a computer and it was my own version of Samsung dex before samsung made dex
Thanks Louis!!! Another great video about stuff that matters! Super appreciate you!!!
To an extent It is not possible to provide some services such as stocks and news without collecting the information on what your watch list is, etc. because the server needs that information to serve a response with the relevant data. This may have been mistaken for analytics.
I get what you are saying but it’s not settings, preferences or App data that is being talked about.
Maybe they try and spin this into “server side processing that helps add functionality to Screen Time” or something.
The thing that was shocking was the comment about “Analytics” which are the actual files your device records about HOW you have interacted with a certain thing.
I usually think of the “Analytics” files containing a list of what files/apps the phone accessed/used at what time.
Anyway. I’m with Louis on this:
They collect more info than they need.
They are not transparent about what they do with it.
And they are not transparent about how long hey keep it.
It IS attached to a device ID so is it anonymized, used for personalization, or is it info that is utilized by every part of the Apple services ecosystem? And then can we trust that this is not used or sold to ANYONE else?
I'm not in the iOS ecochamber, sorry, ecosystem so I don't know-is Apple providing stock tracking services? Because if it's coming from some other service, Apple has no business into logging/listening to these.
Not an apple fan or product user, I am a software developer and I understand that the developer of the app controls the flow of data and the network requests made. My point was that the stocks app Making requests to apples server may have been how they provide the data and not for analytics. Just pointing out one potential flaw with the study. If it is analytics then it is a shame that they are doing that.
@@zwerko The data is provided by Yahoo, but Apple stores and forwards that data for caching and knowing what alerts to send you. The app wouldn’t work without that data.
This video, like a bunch of Louis’s is a bit overblown and click-bait.
Fair point then-if they aggregate/customize the data on their services they obviously need a way to know how to package it for your needs/interests (least they forward you all the stock data and have it filtered out locally but I guess that would be very costly in terms of bandwidth and processing). But then the question is-are they using that data only to provide you the service or are they also capturing it for telemetry sake, and if latter, how much PII can leak via those means. It's probably buried deep in their ToS and privacy policies and, like most companies out there, they are probably not doing a great job of keeping these up to date anyway.
“Why are you doing this in an AppStore ecosystem where I cannot use any other methodology to install apps on my phone?”
The question answers itself.
yeah i feel burned. I got an iphone for the first time in years because I heard they were better with privacy than google. Which is still true but as time has past I realize that I can't trust any of these companies. Will probably make the move to Graphine os soon. Was actually considering a macbook as a computer upgrade but might rethink that too
it would be strange to get a macbook as a computer upgrade ... knowing that a macbook is not even a computer
I can recommend a macbook. I use it as my daily driver. It’s a mix between a windows laptop and a linux laptop, and well done. I don’t know about apple’s practices on macbooks but I do appreciate it. It’s very good for software developers and people editing photo/video.
That’s my 2 cents. For my phone though, I switched from the s21 ultra to the iphone 13 pro, although I think I am considering switching back. The most limiting factor is that my car only supports carplay and not android auto.
You have to make a choice, good devices or private devices. Chose one. Or buy both. No device whatsoever provides a flawless experience AND actual privacy.
Big companies will always disrespect privacy for monetary gain.
I would be interested in GrapheneOS if they actually supported other phones rather than Pixel phones.
grapheneOS would be supporting more phones if there were any that had sane hardware and software bases. Currently the only ones are the Pixels.
Other phone makers add bugs and buggy features and make nonsensical changes to the kernel, have slow or nonexistent security patches , etc
They do "support" other phones, it's just that they haven't officially tested it on other phones
LineageOS worked decently on my s6 if you're looking for an alternative.
@@respriteThx, I will have to check it out.
@HoxtonThx, I will look into it.
As a developer, I can say that in the applications I've developed, I also collect information about everything the user does, every click, every scroll, every button press. At least in my own applications, this data isn't used for advertising or anything malicious. We use the data to replicate the actions a user took before an error occured, so that we can track software bugs. In complicated software environments, software issues can be extremely hard to track and replicate, and so knowing the whole picture of what the app and user were doing at the moment an error occurred can save thousands of hours of developer time.
I'm not saying any of the valid uses for such information justifies ignoring user opt-out preferences, because it really doesn't. But I hope this provides some insight into why this kind of data might be collected, and what it can be used for.
Though i'd bet my last dollar apple is trying to use it for advertising too.
I am not surprised at all
Was not aware of this Louis thank you! This is some grimy shit. They preach endlessly about privacy and security. It’s just a rouse.
I would try GraphineOS if it supported my device. But I will consider compatibility list for it when buying a new one.
I'm running something even more private than GrapheneOS. An old school flip phone that runs such a bare bones AOSP build it cannot even install apps, run an app store, or use data.
Home of the suicide nets. Apple, we don't care about anything but profits.
Do not forget about child labour
@@Feefa99 don't forget about slave labor in Africa.
so your cats fly in on a private jet with each of them a personal assistant carrying them around? Now who's the boss :p
Remember when Google claimed they didn't listen when you weren't using an app to give you targeted ads?
OMG YOUR CO-HOST HAS RETURNED!!!! WELCOME BACK. MR. CLINTON!!!!
BREAKING NEWS
THE SKY IS BLUE
As someone that has been saying this for years, I am glad that people are barely realizing it, but it's kinda too late at this point
I'm switching from my iPhone to Android soon.
Ok so …. Getting from bad to worse,p
@@imicca well I don't see any other alternatives.
Android isn’t any better😕
@@dominicperez3777 stay on iPhone, enough to give data to 1, now you want to share with other??
I've been an iPhone-only person for a while now... though shit like this is what's making me question if I should start to find a good-enough Android phone to mess around with when the time's up for my current iPhone. I already ditched Windows for Fedora Workstation on my desktop & haven't looked back, would love to try ditching iOS for something like GrapheneOS when Apple decides to kill off support for the current gen iPhone SE.
Only reason I'm still hesitant to is just a lack of exactly what I'm looking for as far as devices - seemingly, no manufacturer besides Apple makes a device that checks all my boxes of:
Graphene sounds like a great idea, but is pretty limited to what you could do with low effort, like, not wasting a lot of time trying to do stuff samsung does effortlessly. I have been using samsung for like 10 years now, i love all the extra features i get from my phone, tablet and watch and use them on the daily for studying and entertainment, but i hate how much data they collect. I try to limit the data collection as much as i can by opting out of stuff but i know it's not enough, and I'm kinda getting more lax about it as it is just getting more annoying. Another annoying thing is that the privacy focused hardware and software is on average years behind the current standard.... So it's hard switching to them.
considering the number of red flags you just put on a single comment, i'll give you at minimum 10 years until you start becoming interested in grapheneOS .
Seriously, what is the point of forming such strong opinions about something you're totally unfamiliar with
private os? Very, very private!! Hmm! Where have I heard this before?? Always, from all of them, since the browsers .
Never, ever would we do this, promise.
Do you want privacy, do not go on line.. drop out of every single thing in modern world. Do not go to the doctor, do not get a driver's license.
Do not file tax but do not get arrested!
@@mr.serious707 no, just the government sells information! Not tax evasion if you figure out how to owe zero taxes, you know like the 2% do.
@@YounesLayachi i mean, it's not that i know jack shit about them, i just do not know if it is actually worth all the effort and "sacrifices". google/microsoft/facebook will most probably eventually get info even if i take all precautions, something will slip through the cracks. take for example my uni, they use microsoft sharepoint for everything. those fuckers (microsoft) will not serve you anything on the website if you do not enable ALL cookies. I'm not going to make a virtual machine on all my "private alternative" devices to be able to casually check my schedule or download some lecture material... (i usually use a vpn for what it's worth)
Out of curiosity, what are the things you do on a daily basis that necessities a Samsung device/tracking (+Google tracking) that would take a lot of effort and not be as effortless on GrapheneOS? Short of services that absolutely require sharing data with the 'mothership' (but then why even bother w/ a privacy/security oriented OS if you have desire to use such services) and stuff that requires super-privileged access (only Android Auto comes to mind), I can't think of such a thing.
Apple has only ever respected their exclusive competitive advantages from sole ownership of your data.
Is it a bad sign if I like the extensive cat content and ask for more in future videos?
Not that I sh1t on privacy but nowadays it out of hand anyways. So instead of being upset with such information I did really enjoy your cat content.
Louis, Louis' Team and everyone else reading this... Have a wonderful and enjoyable day
I think the apps mentioned here are not ones we use very often. So yes, it sucks that they are collecting data but it doesn't really matter too much as compared to say UA-cam, Facebook, or TikTok. The App store is well . . . a store and to run it effectively, they need some information about the people using the store. So them collecting some data on the users to use within the store should be okay.
Now if they are sharing this info with other companies so these other companies can market their products to us within different apps, that would be a big problem.
Well, do consider a certain category of apps he mentioned which regard ones health. One such type of app would be a woman's period tracker app. Now what if such an app clued in that they possibly had an abortion, and Apple just so conveniently shared this information with the authorities... 🤔
Granted that this is just a hypothetical, but it's a very realistic hypothetical that could actually happen. Bad Apple, bad!
Ok, but the problem is that they give you option to stop sending data to them but even If you use this option they are still sending data. So the point is that they are lying.
At least that is what video say because I did not checked. Maybe they are still sending data which was mentioned but they are not sending some other types of data or something like that
The App Store used to work perfectly fine before this bruh
@@My_Old_YT_Account There is always a time before and after a company starts collecting some user data to make the experience better for customers. When we open the app store, it is able to show us (recommend) apps that it think we would like. The better it is at doing that, the more satisfied a customer would be. How else do you expect to discover cool new apps? Now of course there must be limits to how much (and what) data is collected, but the type outlined in this video is perfectly fine.
@@Daniel_VolumeDown You're using the App Store, which is an app by Apple on an Apple phone and it's sending some very basic data back to Apple. I don't understand why one would think that that would not happen. Like I said above, this is a store without eisles for us to go through to discover products. So they need a way to market apps to you such that you are able to find what you're looking for and discover new apps at the same time and what they're collecting is extremely basic data.
And like I said, it's the App Atore. It's not a social media platform. Personally, I open the App Store maybe twice a month so I don't think it's a big issue.
It's a competition between the oligarchy to see who can go further than the other and get away with it
It's just digital text, since software isn't open sourced, you can't see them doing the opposite of what they promised
As an Android user, I’m more concerned about 3rd party data collection (3rd party apps, OEMs, carriers, etc.) than I am 1st party data collection (Google) on the Android Operating System. Google allows its users to manage and control the data it collects, even if you want to use targeted advertising and some of the data Google collects is useful to me. One example is the Google Maps timeline feature, I use this quite often to write down hours I’ve worked if I don’t remember the time I got to a certain location. 3rd party data collection is a scary place, big companies like Facebook, and Amazon gives users less control over the data they collect, 3rd party apps and games often sell user data, and then there are apps like TikTok which, under Chinese law, can be compelled to provide a hostile foreign power data that individually is useless but collectively can compromise the security of other nations.
You know google sells your data to 3rd parties, right?
Omg, I'm so glad I don't work for that company anymore.
It’s not protection of your data, it’s monopolization of your data. Why else would they invest money to develop the privacy system, if it doesn’t return any money on the investment?
thank you for reporting on this. this is important stuff
Its also important to consider apple uses data to train Siri's AI so it can predict what your going to do when you pick your phone up. Not all data collection is totally malicious it would just be cool if users could have the options to opt out of whatever they want instead of Tim apple being the only one with access to that setting.
I literally was forced to go to odyssee/lbry to find this video to be able to copy the link to the article to be able to share it. Otherwise, it would just be contaminated by the google's redirect/percent-encoded junk.
Thank you, Louis, for everything you're doing.
I use Ecosia, how good is Odyssee?
Apple: we will respect your privacy, AFTER we've squeezed every single cent out of it
9:35 "How do you not tell? That's Oreo, that's Clinton, and this is Berry."
*Meow*
"Okay nevermind, this is Clinton."
They'll pull the same trick as all of those companies - "we're sorry we got caught, it was a bug anyway"
I've been telling people for years that no company will leave free money on the table. If they can get away with something, they will.
I don't understand why people believe that if Apple makes billions on hardware, they will always respect your privacy. Companies that large do not understand the concept of "enough."
Apple: Oh, look here! Not there while I distract you!
The worst thing that a company/corporation/institution can do is to LIE. Trust cannot be bought and people dont forget. “You reap what you sow”, its a simple yet powerful law of nature.
As an Apple loyalist who thought they respected privacy a lot more than Google I am appalled. Definitely feel betrayed
I worked in the computer games industry. This click and time data is used to drive app revenue. Almost all of your apps doing this.
Finally the star of the show is back. Welcome back to the recliner Mr. Clinton!