Free Infinite Perpetual Energy Nonsense - FAAAAAAKE
Вставка
- Опубліковано 15 тра 2024
- High quality PCB prototypes: www.pcbway.com
3D & CNC service: www.pcbway.com/rapid-prototyp...
🔥This perpetual free energy experiment with a car alternator and an AC motor must stop! Is fake and full of miss information. There is no such thing as infinite energy, we can't have more power at the output than the input, and magnets don't generate power. Sorry if I make any mistake in the video, I'll coprrect them in the first pinned comment.
🔀LINKS
-------------------------------------
Fake experiment video: • Get Free Energy with A...
Occupy mars T-Shirt: teespring.com/es/occupy-mars-...
🤝SUPPORT
-------------------------------------
Join my Arduino Course (Spanish): bit.ly/2JY8icE
ELECTRONOOBS.io: electronoobs.io
Donate on PayPal: www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_...
Help my projects on Patreon : / electronoobs
my Q&A page: electronoobs.io/forum/index.php
Facebook page: / electronoobs
Canal en Español: / electronoobs en español
00:00 Intro
02:11 What to know?
03:19 Magnetic Induction
05:41 Generators and Motors
07:23 Perpetual Loop
09:36 Power In Power Out
11:30 Magnets/Energy
13:22 All in 1
15:05 How to FAKE it?
Like share and subscribe to motivate me. Thank you
#fake
#energy
#exeriment - Наука та технологія
It would be better if you built the "perpetual" things exactly like they do it in the fake videos (a car alternator and electrical motor) and then prove that it doesn't work by trying to "start" the process, not by using two identical motors.
it would be better if you never said stoopidness.!!!
exactly, all he does is repeat fake science
I think the fact that the honest version _didn't_ "start" when turned says it all.
watch the video again and try to understand what he's actually saying. then you might start to understand why the others videos are just view bait
2000 to 3000 watt, the windings from motor to the windings of generator must be act like a stepup transformer.
The oil company offering and say,help us how much?!!! Tell people that is fake!!🤣🤣
I watched that rebuttal video yesterday. Did you happen to notice in that video, that the motor did not run as smooth as it did in the first one? It paused very momentarily on a regular basis, almost like a jerk. I had to rewatch certain segments to make sure I wasn't imagining it, or it wasn't an effect of lighting or something.
Its called stop video because the battery will not last that long
Hi, could you tell me if there is a difference of voltage between passing the magnet in front of a coil and passing the magnet through a coil?
Not really. You always have to think of it as a field of magnetic flux and vectors. Depending on the relative orientation, direction and movement of the magnet and the coil (+its core) the relative vector might vary and induce smaller voltage (Maxwell equations) and not a continuous sinus, but just some bump, as shown at 3:40.
Great vid. Someone needs to refute the avalanche of bullshit that flows online these days
You are 100% in your "science". You are missing the point that a rotating magnetic filed (N, S, N, S, N, S, and so on) around a coil of copper wired does create current. This experiment was first done by Nikola Tesla, it''s nothing new.
Right... the energy comes from whatever is pushing the magnet. You can't push the magnet with the energy produced by the magnet being pushed... what I want to know from the free energy types is an explanation of where the energy comes from, not just "build this device and it will spin forever because... well, it's a secret, big oil is watching me"
Tesla? No. Not even close.
@@CJCruiser it’s simple I’ve tried it and it does work it’s not fake how do you think a dynamo works in a car! It charges the battery so you put it to another motor it will power it simple!
@@seanseverythingandanything6440 you have never used the lever, it is something that has been used to amplify or increase the main force. for example if you want to move a heavy object. if you enter the mechanical field if 2 keys have the same circumference a short handle and a long handle. the long handle has more possibility to do the job faster
@@seanseverythingandanything6440 The combustion of fuel provides the energy to turn the dynamo. It does not create any power, only converts mechanical energy from the engine into electricity at about 80% efficiency. It can never make enough power to spin itself no matter what motor you attach to it.
This example reminds me of a guy who was playing with an alternator and convinced himself he was making a bit over a kilowatt (About 1.5 kilowatts) from around 20-30 watts of input. How? He stuck a roughly 2HP motor on the alternator to drive it, then plugged in a roughly 2 amp at 12V field current. In his mind, he was "putting in" 24 watts of power into his machine (12V x 2 amps of field current). The fact that he was measuring around 1500 watts of output from 2HP of mechanical power should have clued him in, but it didn't.
I have a question what happen when you take the to motors that are the same give it like a 10:1 gear ratio would it be possible to make it run itself and if you change the direction of the motor with smaller gear/pulley would it generate power to at prolong it?
Sounds like a good thing to try.
I really appreciate you for the information. As far as my knowledge of the laws of Physics is concerned what they are doing is fake. I left school 35 years ago but I think no new theory has been developed that violates the basic laws of Physics.
ua-cam.com/video/kHQUGfeHI4I/v-deo.html
You see this is your problem, you don't think outside the box. This is why idiots like these can tell you it's fake. It works
funny how the first part of the video is an ad trying to sell somethine
Thanks Lots ,Very Valued Information Keep going all the best good luck God Blessed You
Where did you get the little red motors. They would be great for a small project
There RC motors
Ok, I get the physics of the process and I agree with your evaluation. But now, please, be so kind and explain to me how they power the electric motor to run? I mean, I do not think they hid another electric motor inside of the main motor to power the alternator. It is not possible to put a small electric motor to power a big 1KW 230V motor from the inside. So, where is the source of power to move the electric motor? In the alternator? How they could have hidden the other motor to make the entire set move? Or they simply had hidden cables to move the electric motor? In some of their videos they move the entire set around and it still runs. If there are hidden cables, it would be hard to do. I also saw another guy who made a similar video but with a generator, not alternator. He coupled an electric motor, a power generator from Trabant, added a big capacitor and started the set from a external battery and after a minute or so he disconnected the battery and the set also worked. He did not do any modification to the power generator and did not add magnets. Just connected an old electric motor with a power generator and a big capacitor, started the whole set from an external battery and it ran by itself. He moved the set around to show it works. But he did not draw any electricity from it, just showed that it works without external power. So, please, explain how they make the set rotate?
Hidden battery and inverter. And you can run a big motor on very low power, just with no load.
Personally I don't trust these Agent Smith videos. We all know the rich have a lot of power, control, and wealth to lose if they can't keep dinging everyone for energy consumption. Only way to know for sure is to throw one together yourself.
I would like to add a comment regarding the magnets, by the looks of their assembly they are trying to create a monopole magnet when they are placing the magnets north to north and south to south. I have attempted to construct a device similar to the ones in the video except on a smaller scale, first, try to assemble magnets with the same poles facing each other, It can be done but with a lot of blood sweat, and even some tears. When the glue dried I found something very interesting and at first unexpected. the next day I started assembling the device and I found that all of the magnets were almost no longer magnets in other words most of the magnetic flux was gone, disappeared. orientating the magnets in opposing directions caused a canceling effect of the magnetic flux. Thanks for allowing my to cents worth, this day and age and what is going on these days I wish this could be true but it's not. Let us take care of the greed and allow people the dignity of life and get rid of the corruption that is our governments and leaders. every decision must be put to a vote every outcome is absolutely transparent and free of charge for any person to review..
‘Many forms of Government have been tried, and will be tried in this world of sin and woe. No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all-wise. Indeed it has been said that democracy is the worst form of Government except for all those other forms that have been tried from time to time.…’
Winston S Churchill, 11 November 1947
man we need someone like you for president haha
I really love the last paragraph that you said👏
@@pstonard You right Peter, so Democratically chosen Governments are never just, or impartial, because people elect the leader often based on his charisma, like that comedian who now runs Ukraine, wanted to join NATO and upset Russians, but a sensible Dictator would not have let this happen that caused so much devastation to both sides, all the way that we are now facing true Nuclear crises, thats because people choose leaders not on their merit and experience , as an example both UK PM and Chancellor been nominated by party members, and look what happened to our Pound!
Nice work, well put. I think there stupid not corrupt. They been brainwashed to believe wat quality & how to run a world maintain power etc etc..things since birth most of them. Just like us. Corruption is a small part, lacking imagination & sense is a major part of the problem. They put stupid ppl in charge to maintain sosociety & spastiCITY! Democracy is not a good thing if the ppl are all retards & have no concept of reality. Wat you want & wat you need are not always compatable. If you don't think or imagine, dream or see things in different lights then you fight for wat you know not wat could be.
Thank you My Friend for these clear words in this Video.
So where did the kinetic energy go that started the spin of the alternator. That was additional energy added to the loop. How would you explain "The Liberty Energy Project" that is not using a modified alternator?
Liberty motor is a scam.
We have a model bag with the Faller Car System on it, but have replaced the batteries with 'supercapacitors', so the charging times of hours are reduced to a maximum of 90 seconds.
Then these are 80/85% loaded and that is sufficient, because there they drive for about fifteen minutes at maximum, but the lap time varies from 1 to 3 minutes, some routes are longer and therefore more 'charging stations' and we do this through 'the copper mirrors on both sides'.
These supercapacitors can therefore also be used very easily, we use 3.8 Volt 50 Farad.
If you want to use one of 50 Volt 500 Farad then they are about 6 Cm long & 3 Cm flat, they have a charge & higher discharge current than batteries can ever have.
These will be used in this type of FAKE power generation.
I challenge these by putting a 5KW old analog movie lamp on it, one of 5KW, to date no one has accepted this challenge and thus fake labeled by me.
Can you make the highest efficiency set up? With the coupler and 3 phase motor etc. I know it wont work because of power loss and other reasons. But you already made a small version of what they made which was all the worst decisions. Show us one with all the best decisions
a coupler will not work : it inverses the rotation, you'd create a short-circuit instantly. Another argument to debunk the debunker LOL
@@dirklanduyt they make opposite spinning motors or you could reverse the polarity. All motors in the world dont spin in one direction
The best decision in any experiment is to apply knowledge to predict the outcome. Then verify it by experiment. Once in a while an experiment does something completely unexpected and that is called a discovery.
The supporters of "Free Energy" believe the presenters have an experiment with unexplained out come, that defies the theory, and becomes their secret discovery.
At that point it is rational and expected by the scientific and engineering community to publish the results and allow Peer review. None of these Free Energy contraptions have been published (beyond FAKE click bait) or subjected for third-party peer review. Only a soft head will cling to the claims made that these are real over unity contraptions.
@@dirklanduyt Wrong! Motor rotation can easily be reversed by reconfiguration of the wires. In this case the swapping of any two phases of the three. Red to Yellow instead of Red to Red and Yellow to Yellow. Machines that use three-phase motors typically have a switch to make this change. Running a lathe "backwards" for example.
Your request is that we "prove a negative"? That's impossible! If you did try to replicate what you have seen in the FAKE videos, and then you complain, the author and presenters of the FAKE videos can simply say "you did it wrong", or "you don't have the right parts", or they left something out "to keep it secret", or "Big Oil (or the government) will come after you". Any story to keep you guessing that the Free-energy scheme is real. As P.T.Barnum said "There's a sucker born every minute" and he was spot on!
You show 2000W in and 3000W out. When this model will stop generate watts? Is it correct that it will stopped if some external device will use 1000w?
what if i use a fly wheel with permanent magnet install on it and a stationary winding alternator (A1) and a 1kv alternator (A2) connected to armature and armature connected to hydraulic motor and hydraulic motor runs through a hydraulic pump and pump runs on Alternator A1 power ....... i think pump will store enough pressure to run wheel and after spin A1 feed the hydraulic pump and it will run in loop hydraulic to mechanical to electrical ........ whats your thought ?????? sorry for my english is weak
Dude, thank you for doing this one! We need to set the record straight, always. Good detail. :)
this guy is producing false information.
@@amazingpower2761 Which part is false,be specific.
@@davidgill3356 his whole opinion is false on how it works. then he does show it by build one from supposedly "fake" video and his version on how they faked it himself.
@@davidgill3356 They don’t get energy out of the magnet and it has nothing to do with the copper wiring that's there other than its original job.
The magnet turns the motor by using the shell of the motor as it turns since the shell or cover is made out of metal. As the motor turns it generates energy similar to a water turbine on dams instead of a propeller or whatever is inside a dams mechanics its the magnets and the metal cover of the motor that is the water and the magnets the propeller that spins the turbine. the use of the other motor is for it to keep it at a constant spin so it generates the max amount of energy or power. because the momentum of the magnets and the spinning will eventually stop.
@@diesiraeetvindictae1635I know perfectly well it doesn’t work. I was trying to figure out if the guy making the comment thought he was lying about it being faked or if he just missed the whole point.
I get your explanation and others as well. Instead of talking about it, build one to prove your explanations. Many people are skeptics and I'm one but he did show what he did...
I will build one soon, f.. too cold now!!
No, he didn't, he _faked_ what he did.
Refusing to acknowledge basic physics principles so that you can continue believing conspiracy theories isn't being a skeptic. It's being wilfully ignorant.
@@GeoffCostanza perfectly very well said
if these free energy devices work then why doesnt the government set up a giant one and give free energy?
will it work if they used shaft to shaft couplers?
I think you should do a series where you recreate these motors and stop yammering on
I have built this 2 weeks ago. And guess what. It works! It damn works!. I had to find something because electricity cost rise 50% here in the UK. Now I can power all my electric radiators using this sweet 'engine' and show the middle finger to greedy electricity and gas suppliers!.
And you... Instead of talking you should actually build one to see it for your own eyes.
Did you have your video? Lemme see!
Feel free to publish your work. Share some PIX and electrical measurements. Would you allow a peer review? Without proof you only have a story...
@@darklight2.1 Just build one yourself!.
@@PraefectusStirling But why do we ask when we can build? Youre the one who built you can show it and explain it how it works
Actions speaks louder than voice. I'll try it also.
I like the eternal ping-pong between free energy prank videos (that get a surprising amount of views!) as well as the debunking videos (I presume also high view numbers). It's really an unwanted symbiosis with no good way out. Until the next such video!
Ye ikr
yup indeed the natural laws prohibit more out than you put in. so i would love to see the facts in the build. i have plenty spare alternators to play with and an electric motor is easy to find but i just cannot see how this can work. if it is reality i am going to buy an electric car and dump the V8 :D
The motivation is not just science, but human greed. Read the comments on the "free energy" videos, many come to ask where they can get the machine or parts to build their own. Often it is to by-pass their own conventional electricity bill or to power their third-world village. It's also greed that motivates copy cat videos that lust for click bait. Sad.
@@wesleyconn620 Jaja - Das ist wie beim Baby machen. Da kommt auch mehr raus als was du da reinsteckst.:D
the videos and subsequent responses make a good pertpetual energy machine
if nothing else, the 'plate' they bolt everything down to - is hanging off the table... which adds a question of "why" - is there a hidden wire back there providing external power?
Can you make a video about the alternator, which has a magnet installed in the alternator, and try to test if it can really produce 220v-2240v power.
ElectroBOOM would be proud of you bro😄😄👌👌👌
Great video! The only experiment needed is to move a rare earth magnet over a coil at a long length between coil and magnet and record the result. Next, in increments, move the magnet closer to the coil etc. if the voltage is raised by 10 times then there is merit to continue onward. otherwise it's fake.
Wow great explanation now I’m dumber 😆
I have a question is it possible for you to do a video on building a home made inverter. with different size transformers running off a 12v battery
Does the magnet strength have anything to do with the electrical current produced?
Yes, the generator formula defines the relationship between magnetic flux (in Webers), rotation speed (N), and number of turns of wire (Z) that is "cut" by the lines of magnetic force, and the number of poles (P) to produce Total EMF (E)
\[ E = P \phi \frac{N}{60} \times \frac{Z}{2} \]
\[ E = \frac{P \phi N}{120} \]
Consider a DC machine with the following parameter;
P = Number of poles
Ф = Flux per pole (Wb)
A = Number of parallel paths in the armature
Z = Total number of Armature conductor
N = Speed of Rotor (RPM)
An automobile alternator exists in literally millions of units manufactured each year, great effort is taken to make the design efficient and reliable. Do you think that attaching a few random magnets is going to suddenly make it "perfect"?
These FAKE videos don't pass any common sense exam.
Someone said "There is sucker born every minute". However - judging by the responses of some people - I propose a motion to change this saying to: "There is a sucker born every 0.1 of a second". This would reflect better the IQ of an average UA-camr.
Sadly, what you said is probably true. But your statement doesn't show a relation to this video.
The funniest part is that the channel that you showed their perpetual energy gizmo would be revealed if they reached 100 million views otherwise they would not reveal the last steps on how to do it , plus without their last part of the how to do it it would be impossible for someone to achieve perpetual energy . The channel knows it will never reach 100 million views .
It is very magnanimous of him to put his perpetual energy machine on you tube rather than create a company to build the product that would transform humanity and make him the richest man in the world.
Thank you for your kind information. Can you till us more about flywheel free energy project? is it fake as will? or it's take some time and shutdown?
Very good my brother. Keep up the good works.
So what do you mean by good work by discouraging imagination and growth are you one of the persons that still works at a coal mine
Again hes one of these naysayers trying to keep you in a small frame of mind he has no imagination he can never build or develop anything out of his book learning, Of course hes going to get angry they got angry at nikolai Tesla they also got angry at Nathan stubblefield these inventors they try to erase from history. What he told you is not all wrong it's just a 1/2 truth you see that he did not demonstrate any of his points with those motors so I'm going to leave anybody who wants to find out for themselves information on what we gathered from the library and what we actually did, That's if this post stays up remember they always try to erase things so I'll be screenshot in this post so all of you can see if or not he takes it down why if your argument is strong you shouldn't have any problem of expressing your point and letting people see and make Up their own minds and better yet experimenting with these types of things as we have at our library. And for anyone who sees this post please Read the comments even when you show proof with no funny business they're going to deny that you even did what you did, Now they're going to claim that you did something or put something inside and all you have to do is just follow the directions for yourselves ask questions if you don't understand. But anyway here's some videos for you to watch please watch them all and then you'll understand it's not free energy it's not perpetual motion is how to loop energy and store energy And then put it back into the system and here is the proof.
1st video
ua-cam.com/video/BZZdY_BTCgs/v-deo.html
2nd video
ua-cam.com/video/I5eFT87bkQ0/v-deo.html
Reference
from lid motor
ua-cam.com/video/tWuVUDjWGSo/v-deo.html
One thing the fake videos forget is "Windage".
Alternators and Generators require a fan to keep them cool so there goes some energy straight off the bat.
"There goes some energy straight off the bat." Never mind that the rest of the energy was freely created, losing a small amount of power for a cooling fan is an L = Shill for energy companies or internet dumbass?
@@duyvuitton6019 I really hope you are an internet troll or a Gen Z'er who believes everything they see on the web (Yay tide pods!) and don't honestly believe you can get more than what you put in.
If you didn't get what I was meaning in my comment, I was hinting to the fact that there are losses that none of these free energy machines take into consideration. It's not just windage, there are many things that stops any of these devices from actually functioning in the real world like energy being wasted through the wires heating up, friction from the bearings, belts and brushes which creates heat, the drag of on the rotating masses going through the magnetic field, etc, etc, etc.
How about some basic math, we will ignore losses for the moment. In this situation a 1000w motor can drive a 1000w alternator by itself, now say I wanted to put a 600w load on it. What happens? The speed of the the motor would drop until it stops because there is not enough energy to supply the motor and the load. So what if you put a bigger alternator on it? Lets say 1600w. Well you will still only have 1000w of energy since the motor can only output 1000w, so when you put that 600w load on it, it will stop that motor in the same way due to not enough energy being in the system to keep that motor spinning.
As for being a shill for the energy companies, well I'd be the worst spokesman for them, as I'm working on converting my caravan to solar so I can go off grid and I'm helping a mate of mine build a gasifier and biogas generation system so we can make human waste into burnable gas and compost, while he builds me a waste oil burner.
The fact we don't all have solar on the roofs of our houses so we'd have abundant free energy honestly gets at me.
If you want free power there is solar, hydro, wind, tidal and thermal, these will produce power passively, each one has there downsides but at least they actually work.
@@newdawn8477 So you're saying it does work to produce energy but mad because you're not achieving full efficiency... you clearly missing the point that perpetual creation of energy w/out reliance of the power grid is a win. You need more than 600w of power? Here's an idea, use more powerful hardware than what they showed...
@@duyvuitton6019 It went right over your head didn't, everything I wrote was proving it could not work and will not work.
I even gave you the best outcome by not factoring in LOSSES.
Go back to school and learn the law of conservation of energy or haven't you got that far?
Even if you had a 15000w motor and a 15000w alternator with ZERO losses, it still wouldn't work. Any load will deplete the system of energy.
Think about it and I mean think about it.
Ever noticed most of the videos come out of the middle east? Could it be they think the west is stupid and by posting videos like that they know someone around the world will waste their time trying to build it...
Thinking about it you should put your money where you mouth is and build one and have it running a 3kw load (this should be easy for you), video it running and then dissemble it with no cuts and post the link here, I WILL watch your attempt.
All of the parts can be brought off of ebay and ali.
Just prove me wrong by doing that.
@@duyvuitton6019 No, that is in no way what he is saying and he isn’t angry. You are just too ignorant to understand, don’t get mad bro.
Hi, and thanks for the video, I have often wondered if I could fit permanent magnets to the axle of the diesel motor on my sailboat, and a coil in front of this, thus generating enough electric to get a hot cup of tea. The idea is great, but I wouldn´t have a clue how to do it safely in reality.
No need to over comlicate the issue. Just run a small (automotive type) alternator from the engine. Or, come to that, mount a small wind turbine, ideally high up the mast.
there are concepts out there to this but as you mentioned it its hard to do, as a electo nuclear profesor it didnt belive in such a thing, reasech and building changed my mind. work for a Gov and you will know how it works. trade off to it is the generator and how big it can get
This is why we depends on the forces of nature like wind, water flows or high pressure steam coming from active volcanoes instead of using gasoline in order to turn our generators and to create what we can call free energy.
Of cours, the generator has to produced more power, otherwise nothing happend. So what's your opinion about the Magnetic generator from Korea ( Infinity SAV)
But it is working :-).
Motor:
Input voltage (system voltage) - 220 V
Rated voltage - 230 V
Rated rpm - 1500 rpm
Input current - 230 V →21.8 A (measured
value)
220 V →
=
20.85 A
Input current = 20.85 A
Input power → P =VI cos ɵ
P = 3669.6 W
Motor input = 3.7 kW
Generator,
Output voltage - 250 V
Rated voltage - 300
Rated rpm - 1500 rpm
Output voltage - 300 V→ 5 kW
Output voltage − 250 V →
= 4166.67 W
= 4.167 kW
Alternator / Generator output = 4.167 kW
Shaft rpm = 750 rpm
Thank you, smart physics guy/engineer! FINALLY someone debunking the close-minded "debunkers"!
If you spin a motor with your hand, it produces an electromotive force. You essentially make it a generator. When the motor spins from an applied voltage, this still happens. Thus, a voltage that opposes the voltage applied to the motor is induced. This limits the current through the motor.
So, the unloaded RPM of the motor may be 1500 RPM, but when you attach the generator as a load, the motor will slow. When the motor slows, the induced voltage decreases, just like spinning a generator more slowly produces less voltage. This actually increases the current, and thus the power consumption of the motor. So, if the motor spins at 750 RPM, it may consume twice the power or more. Now the generator produces 4kW, and the motor needs 7kW to run at that RPM, and it slows. This cycle continues until the system stops.
in theory, a transformer with two 1: 1 windings should also be such a device. which has even smaller losses. than two motors connected together.
"in theory, a transformer with two 1: 1 windings should also be such a device." Yes, a transformer is more efficient than coupled rotating machines (aka motor plus generator) BUT efficiency would have to exceed unity (100%) for this theory to work. Let's say a motor is 80% efficient, meaning 20% losses, Now find a good transformer that is ten times better, meaning only two percent loss, you still need that lost 2% to reach unity. QED.
Some die hard jews on here.
Can you design bldc motor ecs that runs on voltage from 100v to 600v DC and
Also variable speed with potentiometer
Finalmente uno che spiega le come stanno. Grazie!
Non ha spiegato assolutamente nulla
good video. Quick question. If the wheel on the motor is twice the size on the generator thus providing 2 revolution per 1 revolution from the motor. Wouldn't that increase the power supplied back to the motor?
Sounds like a good idea to me.
The generator would turn faster than the motor, but speed and power are different things. They are related when power is expressed as the product of speed and the force opposing that motion.
So the motor with wheel diameter of 2 would only be able to keep turning the generator with wheel diameter of 1 if the generator's opposition to turning was low enough (half of the torque from the motor in this case). Because generating electrical power presents internal opposition to the generator turning, this can only happen when electical output of the generator is less (maybe a lot less) than the electrical power the motor is using.
The power rating numbers on the side of these devices aren't automatically achieved just because you 'turn' the generator or 'power' the motor. You get less electrical power out of a generator than the torque times speed (mechanical power) you put in. Similarly, you get less torque times speed (mechanical power) out of a motor than the electical power you put in.
And for each device, the useful power plus the heat (thermal power) they are putting out is equal to the power going in.
So no matter how you arrange and connect a motor and generator, all you have made is a noisy, really heavy, vibrating heater that needs external power to work.
Making more sense?
@@drienkm Kinda. I have no experience but I kinda understand what you are implying. The generator is not going to supply enough power to the motor. If so, then why not us 2 generator? or 3? One motor to turn all the generator to boost the power needed to run the motor. Add more generator to get enough extra power to recharge power bank. ?
@@channyma Good question. You suggest multiple generators. Maybe the motor has a long shaft (supported by bearings) with multiple wheels, each driving a generator beside the shaft.
It sound like your idea came from your understanding that the power from all the generators is summed together to power the motor. That's right. The problem is that mechanical power needed out of the motor is also a sum - the mechanical power required to turn all the generators together is the sum of that required to turn each one. In this case, the shaft speed is obviously uniform along its length, but the torque in the shaft is not uniform, stepping higher at each wheel as you observe it closer and closer to the motor.
This all boils down to the law of Conservation of Energy (power is just energy over time). Energy can't be created or destroyed. It just changes form. Weve talked about electrical power (voltage times current) and mechanical power (force times speed), and hinted at thermal power (rate of temperature change times mass times specific heat), but there are even more forms energy can take. It can always be quantitatively accounted for. Energy into a device ultimately exactly equals energy out, even if the energy form changes, or some enegy is stored in it for a while (like a portable device).
I understand your video and reasoning why “it should not work” but considering you are also making videos to get views and effectively capitalizing on it, why not try to duplicate their exact machine? It appears like you’d be able to recreate it exactly as they did and at that point debunk it with the demo no? He put up the video of how to modify the alternator. He also states he will make a 2-3 phase motor version. He also states he did not hook up the other phases. There is no way he was able to drill two holes into 1/8 to 1/4” metal using small batteries and a power converter hidden in the motor. None. And in fact that would be an easy demo for you to build in order to debunk your own theory as to how he did it. These batteries would not only have to power the inverter to convert the energy into 220! but also power the motor strong enough and fast enough to spin the alternator too? Respectfully, I don’t feel you can say it does not work until you build it and try it yourself. I feel that if you built it and it worked, you’d come back in another video and be honest and humble about it. I myself am making plans to get a Valeo 60011 alternator like he uses and plan to recreate his experiment to a “T”. I know this generator is not going to power a whole house. But if I can power lights in a green house and not spend so much on an inverter, solar panels etc., it’s worth the fun to try! Thank you for taking the time to make this video.
Sounds like a great experiment. You should make a video and post as a response. Be safe, hope you find your answer, and I look forward to your video response.
Now i know.. thanks to you master.... You nailed it... This video deserves millions of views... I hope they could see this before they do thier own experiments.... Thanks a lot for the information .... Loud and clear from the Philippines
So how do I make my own dynamo like on the push bike on wheel system? And how do I increase my alternator voltage from 14.3 v to 240v like my solar inverter DC to Ac
You are, of course, absolutely correct in your video. Thanks for setting the record straight.
They have modified the alternator to be a 3 phased alternator and connected to a motor, mono phased. And when they crank the motor, it seems really easy to spins.
Most likely the Alternator in the FAKE demo is not connected electrically, The wires and connector block are just for show. Please don't think that the "spare line" is the secret that delivers the "magic".
By removing the insides of the alternator it is easier for the small motor hidden in the big black motor to turn the belt.
Is this same also for liberty engine v2?
In some videos they use a huge iron weel to store some mecanical energy.
The sistem works for a few minutes untul the huge weel loses that spinning energy.
The first step in making a perpetual energy machine or a free energy machine is figuring out where to hide the batteries in the machine.
LOL :)))
thats honestly the hardest part of making such a machine
By electroboom 😂
or tesla coil
Motor-Generators are nothing new either, got to really huge size in industrial settings largely phased out since solid state converters, which are very much more efficient by a huge amount thereby saving $ by a large amount too, whatever the cost of the solid state converter initially is.
And huge reduction in maintenance .
If Motor-Generators were 200% efficient, thats like printing money, and what industry would not be doing that if it were possible? i mean it would be profit with just that!!!. So ask yourself just how plausible is the free energy bullshit. Its far more plausible if you think its possible, that you are a absolutely stupid......
Everything you explained made sense. But the problem solver in me wants to try to find a way to make it work. :-) I know that sounds funny, but that is just how I am wired.
The first thing I started thinking about was to take your solution of connecting the shafts of the generator and the motor, however I would add a heavy duty flywheel in the middle. My thought was that the flywheel would help the motor turn the more powerful generator while keeping the power consumption down. At least that is my thought. So what do you think the Flywheel would add to the equation?
it's impossible without breaking the laws of physics themselves, you'd a material with literally 0 friction and keep the thing contained in a perfect vaccum and even then the energy inside is just part of a cycle, no new energy would be able to come out
@@romanpackham8471 But did they give us all the info at school? If yes, a flying saucer or ufo can not fly or stay stationary because there are no wings or rotors and there is no sound. Same with the incredible speed they can reach and the instantaneous disappearing or movement from one place to another 10 kilometers away. Not possible with the laws of physics as we know them. Yet these phenomena have been seen and are documented.
@@martinuso7446 ufos, unlike that nonsense, actually have science to back that up
it's called the alcubierre warp drive and it basically involves compressing spacetime itself infront of you and expanding it behind you which causes spacetime to push you along
it's sci-fi and needs tons of research before it can be made but it's actually got a chance of happening
oh and the chance of those sightings actually being possible are either illusions or hoaxes, a warp drive would have a very distinctive mark with it visibly lensing the light around it
as for the lack of sound, noise cancelling headphones use inverted frequencies to cover up the external noise so just use those if you want some quiet in atmosphere
m.ua-cam.com/video/n16gzOQeMpo/v-deo.html
m.ua-cam.com/video/n16gzOQeMpo/v-deo.html
so cars use belts because they are so ineficient? analternator is the same as a motor? 10 cm copper wires is a factor for energy loss?
Was there a question we can answer?
@@pstonard there are 3 questions sir and another one from yourself. Plenty of questions and often their answers are mistaken for opinions or other questions.
@@razvan-andrei-popescu528 Please clarify for those of us confused by your earlier statement, happy to answer well crafted clear questions!
(Q1) ...
(Q2) ...
(Q3)...
(Q4)...
Thanks In Advance,
Hi from cuba , what do u think about the company ONION and his GENERATIOR FK , IS REAL OR NOT ; THANKS
Thank you for taking the time to expose these liars
He is asking only stupid questions.....
@@hansjoviscroes7343 What would be the smart questions? Be specific.
this video should have 7mln views not the other way around. thanks for explanation for a non electromechanical guy. I understood everything!
How can the alternator in the car charge the car's battery when the car is running.
Engine runs the alternator its connected. Then the alternator generates the power that will be stored in the battery.
To me the guy modified the car alternator with nyodeniom magnet as shown in his video and will all no that alternator has three face and the other motor is a (synchronous motor) an this motor has a different mode of operation which Is different from other motor.the futures of the synchronous motor are
1. The motor is not self started
2. When the motor is been synchronize it lock and the motor move the with constant speed of the prime mover
3. The motor is not dependent on other prime mover when on load
4. The motor will not change in speed on load or not on load after it has been synchronize
5. The speed is constant with prime mover even if on load
Now the second point is that the guy also modified the Ac synchronous motor with nyodeniom magnet which produces low rpm with high frequency and now put the output of the motor to a socket with he use to power the instrument
Note let me give u the breakdown
1. He use the alternator to power the synchronous motor
2. He use the synchronous motor to power household
He did not show where he modified the synchronous motor
he used two power not one
One power from the alternator and the other power from the synchronous motor
It's funny to me how they couple two machines together in their videos and pretend like noone ever thought of that. If you walk into a laboratory for electrical machines you can find this kind of setup everywhere. One machine acts as load on a machine that you are trying to make measurements on. It's an efficient way to test machines because you only need to supply the energy for all of the losses in the setup. But of course you can't gain energy this way. Awesome video!
like placing a light bulb over a solar panel and close the loop :))))
@@ELECTRONOOBS ah yes. Making influencing video just to lower people's faith on free energy machines. There's no such thing as 100% efficient machines as there's always losses. However, they can be overcame by energy creation aka overunity machines. Free energy machines are a DISTRACTION towards overunity machines which naturally have greater than 100% efficiency. It's either underunity or overunity. No such thing as unity. Ironically, overunity allows FTL. It's either under light or over light. Funny how truths are stranger than fictions.
All you ever are, is an electronic engineer. You never really understood magnetism nor how it TRULY functions. Hint: They are REAL unlike what you are brainwashed with.
Why would you make this video debunking something if there wasn't something worth debunking! So what if people believe in it! Let them fail! Try all you want you will lose people are waking god is here
@@ELECTRONOOBS I believe you when you say it’s fake kinda makes sense. I’m no expert but I do have a question. If you had a batter, alternator and motor and made enough power to keep battery charged while it runs the motor wouldn’t it be possible to keep battery charged from motor and runs small appliance like charge a phone
Hallo Herr Diermeier, lesen Sie bitte mein Kommentar.
If i have one question, I'd ask why is this channel so underrated?!
Keep it high bro, You deserve more & more. Big love from Egypt💞
I have thought this up also but, i was going to use a floating magnet generator not regular bearings but magnetic floating bearings. Also to turn the generator; I was going to use earth magnets and a lever to spin the pulley/generator. Or, I was going to use electromagnets that kick on using a pickup coil; still nothing touching. Thereby spinning the generator once spun by hand. By advancing the pickup coil timing by moving / turning the pickup coil to increase speed or a timing circuit. Also I was wanting to see if I placed the whole generator in a tube like it was a bettery and vacuum pump to create a vacuum in this sealed tube.
Thats all.
Ocean waves can also spin a generator with levers and an ocean.
This is to power not just 1 house but several states. Also power wires need to be run underground and even better by optical cables using a lazer to transefer electrons with.
Idk about the lazers...
But, the generator will self turn by Earth magnets for 1k years.
And Free Energy.
We are not smart all the best ideas are outside of the box!
You Can Do It!
Please make a video when you have accomplished this!?
Your awesome and thanks!
Their example ran for two hours continuously. How was that done?
why didn't you mention the alleged patent that they say is blocking this technology
And that patents not only expire, but they don't keep ANYBODY from building something, just from profiting off it. The "patent" argument is a favorite of people who claim impossible tech.
@@SiriusJMoonlight even if this miraculous 'patent' did exist do the crazys honestly believe countries like china and india plus any developing one would pay any attention to it if this was actually possible?
@@chrisclarke6344 They have no idea at all. They come from the "I heard a thing once" school of thought.
@@SiriusJMoonlight the number who think this is possible is amazing, it appears a lot wear tinfoil hats as well.
The dual motor design scam is very popular these days since the scam is even easier to pull off as battery technology has gotten smaller and more efficient compared to the 2010 days, so you can stuff a battery powerful enough inside one motor to drive the other pretty easily.
yea, I"m surprised so many people fall for it. At least back in the 2010s and 2000s the crazy people using this technology would claim over unity or energy created out of thin air. That video claim 10kw of energy and doesn't even attempt to explain why it creates more energy than the alternator or motor.
is there any way to make a generator ?, of 3kw. super easy to build?
I love the presentation and explanation I have a portable generator like this the only difference is mine Burns about a gallon an hour😅
I love when someone shines light on to the darkness of "free energy"
All of you are idiots thinking free energy isn't possible. Nikola Tesla created free energy from the Earth's magnetic field, but the powers at be stopped him, of course. People like you stopped him.
There actually is a working 'free-energy' machine. I've seen it, tested it, etc.. There is no such thing as creating energy from nothing; that is true. But there is a way to create energy from SOMETHING. You just need the right 'SOMETHING.' It works!
yup a Stirling engine would be ideal.. trouble is the friction and losses make them so week they could not propel a generator
Plutonium maybe? It’s what they use on the mars rovers, free energy!!! (Of course, radioactivity is just a kind of very slow burning fuel, it doesn’t last forever)
@@CJCruiser thats not free energy its literally the energy emintating from the plutonium thats what radiation is, its a form of energy that the element just cannot contain and therefore it leaks out but will eventually stop, and you cant just harness the pure energy coming from the plutonium you have to get it through other means like putting it in water so the water will heat and boil and turn to steam and then turn a turbine which produces energy
@@Fisheiyy sorry, I meant for my exclamation marks to indicate sarcasm, I know what radioactivity is, I just can't for the life of me figure out what other people here think free energy is.
@@CJCruiser That's not free energy. Try the Earth's magnetic field. Everyone needs to read about Tesla's work before commenting.
Good job keep it coming
Great video, thanks for sharing 👍
you know how its fake? its "free energy", but they dont show you how to do it and dont disclose any info on the equipment due to "patents"
The free energy is produced by the Tommyknockers.
Excellent video! I like that you mentioned the reaction to the Lorenzt force. I think many people hear "moving a magnet near a coil creates a current" and think "Oh! well then just put magnets on anything that moves anyway and presto! Free energy!". Anyone who has shorted a DC motor and tried to spin it should get the right idea pretty quick:)
Research gerad morin ,also iconium technology, free electricity is a reality
@@dominicgeorge7299 I looked them up. Both seem to live mainly on youtube. I did not find any links between these people and peer reviewed research or anything that actually challenges established physics. In the "2018 study" (actually just another yt video) the guy shows some basic textbook formulas and says they were "found on youtube"! This is glaring evidence of lack of education, and is pretty lethal in terms of credibility. Instead of presenting operating principles and relationship to known fundamentals, the "study" focused on just listing specific minutia and specifications of the motor and controller, in exhaustive detail. This is typical of analysis by uneducated people, or those who don't understand fundamentals. For example, the "study" focused on isolated voltage or current readings to support claims of over-unity, without discussing the thermodynamically meaningful quantities of power and energy that must be central in showing that you have created an over-unity device.
Full disclosure, I spent about 10 minutes scanning his 2 hr slideshow.
@@drienkm what you see being Don is not theory it's hands on real why would you look for a theory, when it's being done and explained in your face, check iconium technology again hear what is being said the principles is explained in detail, now follow the instructions yourself, also gerad morin has brought engineers at his work shop and demonstrated his principles to wich the engineers scratch their heads and said they will have to check with more theory, there's a lot of people who don't want this knowledge to be available, I'm sorry to say that I have a feeling that you are one of those people, there is a website on internet created by gerad and bue , take a trip to Nigeria where you can see multiple houses using this technology
@@dominicgeorge7299 Well, the goal in this case is to create energy for free, right? Don't you need to know what energy is to show that you're doing that? (These people have not shown that).
Nobody contests that you can make devices where some particular measurement of output is higher than the input. Devices that increase measurable things like voltage, current, torque, and rpm are common, but these are not over-unity or free energy. You have to actually understand what energy is to show that you're making it from nothing. The thing about energy is you can't really measure it directly. You have to measure its components and calculate it, but that involves basic theory.
These people are not stupid, they are doing what we all do do until we learn to use the tools of prediction that established theory can provide. I tried to make a motor /generator pair run forever when I was about 8... It didn't work and now I understand why.
@@drienkm you have not and did not watch iconium technology where not only the principles was explained but a full demonstration, if you're not going to watch from beginning to end then you can't speak, please watch iconium technology where a Nigerian explains in detail then demonstrates, note that iconium technology video is not monetize, not like the free energy is faaake guy is ,he is an influencer paid to cast doubt, also I dare you to research maxwell chikumbutsu I hope I'm spelling his name right, he is from Zimbabwe 🇿🇼 and the first inventor of a television that operates on free energy, using radio waves, he has also invented an electric car that does not need charge, also an helicopter that runs on multiple fuel sources, last but not least is research the name Harlow mayne's h2 flex an inventor from Jamaica who runs his car off of water only, he sells his device for $1000 dollars, you can find his device on you tube being used by Americans, sorry but your time is up please don't be upset
Hello electroNoobs at first I always though there would be power loss but what about supra conductivity?
Yeah, I wondered why most videos didn't show the motor & alternator direct coupled by the shaft as like you say surely a belt would add unnecessary friction.
There is no reason to make the FAKE contraption efficient. It is a showman's prop. Nothing more.
Third mistake . . yes it is more efficient to use a 3 phase motor if you are transfering the total power from generator to motor and vice versa but they are using only 1 phase motor and they have given the alternator a first spin from the wire which created enough torque to generate an electrical current to run the motor which has a bigger pulley than the alternator . . so there's nothing fake in this
Basic Physics FAIL
The Spanish guys ran their equipment for 2 hours constantly, on screen, with powered accessories. Small, hidden batteries and an inverter could not achieve that. Some kind of magic is going on with the powerful neodymium-magnet configuration in the alternator, within the earth's magnetic field. The device has been replicated, or approximated, on UA-cam, in several other countries too.
He did also say there was a couple more things he hasn't told us about too.
He didn’t show all around the table, it would be easy to run a cable behind the TV. He makes it look like he plugs the TV into the device, but wires work both ways, the surge protector distributes power from the cable plugged into it.
What about resonance effects? ... for the forward-supporting coupling of both components ...
"What about resonance effects?" Can you share your theory with us? What is a forward-supporting coupling? Post a PIX or video so we can learn from your science.
@@pstonard ... well ... i have no science beside the normal physics stuff ... i found the following video with useful explainations:
ua-cam.com/video/sbdU7AkH6QM/v-deo.html
...
Mult respect ai demontat aceste nonsesuri Un om cu inteligenta nu poate crede in perpetum mobile
The secret to free energy is to hide the battery very well. :D
even the battery is old-fashioned, which is already replaced by the 'supercapacitor', fully charged in 2 minutes (80/85%) and can handle very large discharge currents, more than the 18650 battery.
@@oldwizzy supercapacitors have a very poor energy density.
@@VrumsAdventures
Je moest eens weten hoeveel echte capaciteit ze in werkelijkheid hebben.
zie onder andere > Reload station supercondensator uitgeruste faller car systeem
ua-cam.com/video/XG2DhcBAFdg/v-deo.html
oplaadtijd 1 minuut, rij tijd ruim 10 minuten, moet je eens met Li-on accu's doen qua opladen, dan ben je UREN bezig met opladen, wat dat betreft heb JIJ nog heel wat bij te leren, energie dummie.
Only free energy is from sun, wind, hydro, etc forces... Its free and doesn't violate energy laws
@@oldwizzy the energy (in Joules) in a capacitor is the half the capacitance times the voltage squared. Let's take a standard 100F supercap which roughly has the same volume as an 18650 cell (18 mm diameter and 65 mm length for the 18650 Li-Ion and 22 mm diameter and 47 mm length for the supercap). At 3.7V the energy in a standard 3Ah Li Ion cell is 11.1Wh. The supercap is a 2.7V rated one, so a 100F one can hold 364.5J of energy... that's a little bit over 0.1Wh, 111 times less than a similarly sized 18650 cell on average. And this is a high end supercap.
Yes there are advantages to SuperCaps, but energy density is not (yet) one of them... and there are some new supercaps that are hibrids between a supercap and a li-ion battery, those are even more niche and still at 10x the energy density are an order of magnitude less dense than li-ion batteries.
The "free energy" video are a complete Joke no doubt. That one in particular I also watched it with interest and also looked at some comment ... hilarious.
I don't know It they delete the good comments from the comment section, but on those videos pretty much everyone agrees with that fake project...
@@ELECTRONOOBS Oh yes ...it's hilarious and that makes me think why almost all comments "buy" into the "free energy" idiocy. i wonder also if someone is not erasing the other rational and knowlegable comments alerting for the scam.
To ciekawe jak masz agregat prądotwórczy
His T-shirt convinces me that he is both smart and right. I should probably stop wearing my "I'm stupid" T-shirt.
Just saw your video about fake power generation. It was really great.
too bad he is wrong.
All factors affecting the amount of power generations and the associated motor losses and efficiency are well explained. The application of Faraday's law on power generation and the opposing magnetic field effect under Lenz law must be considered.
All the rules and conversions bring you to the state determined only by them. There are still states that no one has measured or calculated yet, but using the frame you will never get to them.
@@MsWaldx laws that in uni.v. cannot be broken much like
#1 e-mc2 thermodynamics 1st law energy cannot be created or destroyed IE. E-MC2 those are laws that cannot be broken .
1. I'm with you when you say that there should be a reduction in speed of the motors when a load is added.
2. I wouldn't be so quick to call it fake if I haven't tried the experiment myself and actually built it exactly...
3. You give your theory of how fake that video was without having built the contraption you conceived of in your mind for us to see.
4. You title your video demonstrably exaggerated as the video you're criticizing never even hinted at "perpetual" or "infinite"
5. The video... also did not say that the magnets make more power than... But most of us who watch these things know that you change the nature of the device and it can produce more power when you've done as was described...
4. The people of that video you're debunking/criticising have a much much better command of English than you do so I won't blame you if you misunderstood what they were articulating.
I will try to build it because there is some logic in it taking into consideration that the start-run capacitor in the induction motor might have something to do with what seems to be a lack of power loss when a load is added. And to be fair, the guys in that video didn't mention the start-run capacitor, but those induction motors need them and was probably connected.
I'm with you 💯% and I'll try it.
I don't know why he forgot all induction dynamos produce DC energy which all rotors in any generator produce DC which produce electromagnetic in it (N/S). When the electromagnetic force is produced in the rotor and rotate around either copper or aluminum coil the AC must be generated.
Winds up, neodymium magnets is used in a rotor to replace the electromagnetic. So the magnetic field is produced, nothing could stop the generating of AC when the rotor is rotating. He forgot that it's a low rpm alternator, it doesn't required 2800-3600 rpm.
A simple experiment (Put the wires of your induction motor in your mouth and rotate it's rotor, you will fell the charge in your mouth) the highere the speed the highere of the the charge and vice versa.
It's not face.
BS!
ua-cam.com/video/sbdU7AkH6QM/v-deo.html
Your points of criticism e.g. No 4 tell us you just don't understand the first thing about electric motors or physics. The fundamental understanding of anyone who does, is that *_by definition_* if you create a setup where a generator powers a motor that drives that generator _you have created a perpetual motion machine._
Also your patronising second point no 4 (that should have been labelled 6 I presume) indicates that you think a foreign accent means lack of "command" of English. I think he spoke well and articulately and if you can't hear past the accent then shame on you. Also, just by the way: the original video that you refer to is all narrated in text. How does that demonstrate a "better command of English"? If they put all this video's spoken information into closed captions would that impress you more?
@Peter Türr Yeah either Google translate is having a meltdown or you just wrote 199 words of meaningless technobabble. I'll leave it up to the student to work out which "as an exercise."
Sure, scientists don't know what they are talking about because they only work in theory. Of course, they haven't ever reproduced the experiment. Because that's exactly how science works, right? Yaaaah.
what if they are connected at the shafts/
Until I saw this video, I didn't know if this type of free energy device works or not. In the video I detected multiple psychological tricks used to influence people. There's that. Also I am an electrician. And I caught him telling a couple of untruths. So now I KNOW the devices work. Thank you.
I'm sick of all these rubbish free energy videos when awesome content like yours exists.
no not sick they are entertaining and fun to watch. oh and also make one think a little outside the box.
What content ? Using irrelevant arguments to denounce something unrelated si as fake as it gets.
Jews...
Magnets are devices that cne help us convert aetheric energy into electricity through induction.
Correct me if I'm getting something wrong, but wouldn't using a coupler and connecting the motors face to face make the direction of their rotation opposite to each other? Where as using a chain/belt system makes both the motors spin in clockwise/anti-clockwise direction. Or the direction doesn't matter?
Doesn't matter. Just swap the cables...
this was a great video, thank you
Combine self running generators and power walls in homes and businesses, to have seemingly endless clean energy everywhere all the time. Even if the the output is lower, if it's continuous, you'd still build up ALOT of energy in your power walls, to use for everything.
How much is ALOT? Can you share some maths or measurements to your claims?
I love a lot of energy in my power walls !!!
Nice video, about time someone did not try to brake the laws of thermodynamics
Why would you do that? Please don't stop dreaming about braking 'some law'. Let's call it visioneering, which might lead to pioneering. Just know when you are dreaming
In order for the laws of "thermodynamics" to apply you would have to incorporate something that generates energy from a heat source. Dumba$$ don't even understand the term "thermo" but want to open their mouths like they know something. 🤦♂️
man dreams of building the eternal machine
I want to see the free energy video, where they hook up bright lights to shine on solar panels.
The bright light hits the solar cell, & generates enough energy to power the lights.
Another winner.
Surely, you jest...??
FINALY! Someone getting this nonsens BS attacked and debunked! Great video!
So let me get this straight, dude debunks a product by building something completely different and spouting off theories that are not applicable.
Thanks Todd, I will add to your clever comment here and repeat what I said above.
It is real. The Liberty Engine is the level of Tesla technology in the 21st century, created by someone with an open mind and the balls to show and share it with the world. He wants more people to know about it, but is afraid the government will fuck him and kill him if he does, like what happened to Tesla and many others who tried to publicize and commercialize similar inventions. There is apparently another piece of the puzzle which he doesn't reveal because he is justifiably afraid of the government coming after him, and I would be too if I were in his position demonstrating a scientific breakthrough/discovery to the world, and as Tesla also was hesitant to go public with his invention, especially after receiving a number of threats. Anyone who urges that it is fake is either a naive, cynical close-minded idiot, competitor, working for a power company, is a member of a branch organization of the asshole "illuminatis", or is simply a disgusting reptilian alien being working undercover, as usual, as they are not allowed to blow their own cover. And the people who are going to reply to my comment here, you will be able to tell what kind of person it is based on what they say. Pay close attention. You are smarter - and more spiritual - than you know.
Anyway, I don't know about more energy being put out than put in (he may have some secret to that that he's afraid to reveal to the public because of what happened to Tesla and others for trying to do the same), BUT it makes sense to me that if you design/tweak a motor to have the same amount of friction and level of efficiency when rotating as the alternator connected to it (with the help of a little magic of strong coil + powerful magnets), the power assigned and transferred to the motor from the alternator would be the same amount of power returned to the alternator by the motor, hence an infinitely, autonomously running, free energy machine (after you give it the initial starting energy or 'jump start'). Where the hell is the doubt in that??
Thank you for making this!!! I wish it was more convincing to those noobs in the comments of the aforementioned channel.
Plz make a video on using washing machine motor to convert hydro power into electric power . Is it real
But would it work if you used a low to high transformer? Then it should have more output than input yes no?
No, sorry it won't work. A transformer can step up or step down VOLTAGE (or CURRENT) but a transformer can NOT step up or step down POWER. Please do your own research on something this basic.
No