'Poker's 1%' by Ed Miller | Podcast

I review the GTO related book, ‘Poker’s 1%’ by Ed Miller. I don’t necessarily recommend the book to my audience, but there are plenty of good strategy takeaways I got from it.
#pokerbooks
Visit this episode’s show notes page for screenshots and links:
www.smartpoker...
Thank you so much for watching this podcast episode. If you’d like more audio goodness, subscribe to the Smart Poker Study Podcast in your favorite podcatcher.
iTunes: itunes.apple.c...
Stitcher: www.stitcher.c...
Player FM: player.fm/seri...
Soundcloud: / user-705283261-811626729
Podbean: www.podbean.co...

[@chessbrilliance8783]

This 1% stuff is unapplicable concretely. Since 85 % of the players at least has a hand's strength oriented philosophy and underbluff massively, keeping a 70% call frequency is a major leak in most poker game.

[@SmartPokerStudy]

I would agree with you, Chess

[@paulpena5040]

I think he's misunderstanding this book. I read it and he's outlining key components of minimum defense frequency and how crucial frequencies are. He is NOT saying that's all there is to poker. It's a baseline to START from. But then you adjust per player type, game type, board texture, # of villains in the hand, etc. But I can assure you at lower stakes almost everyone folds too easily and bluffs too infrequently. I've bet $10 on the river into a $100 pot and gotten folds more times than I can count with literally any two cards. They could call me 70% of the time and I'm still printing money (they need to call 91% of the time).

[@chesscoachgerry4140]

I have to agree with this quote 100% of the time lmao only poker players say that :D

[@SmartPokerStudy]

Cool beans

[@user-nm8ji4fk2v]

Perfect video!

[@SmartPokerStudy]

Thanks, Buddy.

[@oliverjordan695]

@@SmartPokerStudy ed should release 1% gto solver edition

[@SmartPokerStudy]

Yeah, but I'm not sure how much he's into poker nowadays. Seems to be more into sports gambling.

[@kawahxue8332]

ilove your video，

[@SmartPokerStudy]

Thanks, kawah