C919: Flying Junk? Even Vietnam Won't Touch It!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 лип 2024
  • China's C919 aircraft, heavily promoted by the Chinese government as the first completely "domestic" plane, actually has poor quality and frequent issues. Most of its main parts come from the US, and it hasn't received airworthiness certificates from Europe or the US.
    Recently, Vietnam Airlines faced a shortage of planes due to engine maintenance problems, causing a spike in domestic ticket prices. During a shareholders' meeting, shareholders asked if Vietnam Airlines would consider buying the C919 to address the shortage. According to Vietnam News, CEO Le Hong Ha said they are closely watching the C919's progress in getting global airworthiness certification. Currently, only Chinese authorities have certified it, suggesting Vietnam Airlines is not considering purchasing the C919 yet.
    #chinaobserver
    All rights reserved.
    ⭐You can support us at: donorbox.org/china-observer-s...
    ⭐For business cooperation, please contact us: business@chinaobserver.co

КОМЕНТАРІ • 842

  • @holycrapski
    @holycrapski 18 днів тому +20

    Every passenger gets their own Chinese parachute that opens on impact.

    • @LiZhengYe
      @LiZhengYe 16 днів тому +1

      How about Flying coffin Boeing 737 max..??

    • @Villjune53
      @Villjune53 13 днів тому

      @@holycrapski 😂🤣😅

  • @jcmoralde65
    @jcmoralde65 18 днів тому +15

    Made in china??Think Million times😅😅😅

  • @HungPhamVan-ir6dt
    @HungPhamVan-ir6dt 18 днів тому +47

    Damn, are they getting the rejected Boeing parts to build the plane

    • @matthewmosier8439
      @matthewmosier8439 18 днів тому

      Boeing parts are generally fine.
      A door falling off has been turned into a mountain by the media.. the question is, "why?"

    • @fabferrari
      @fabferrari 18 днів тому +1

      @@matthewmosier8439 Well, it's not only a matter of a "door". Please keep in mind that just yesterday: "Boeing has agreed to plead guilty to a felony fraud charge and pay a new fine in connection with two 737 Max 8 crashes that killed 346 people in 2018 and 2019, the U.S. Department of Justice said in a court filing on Sunday night".

    • @matthewmosier8439
      @matthewmosier8439 18 днів тому

      @@fabferrari Yeah, but those crashes likely would not have occured had the pilots been Western trained.
      The dirty truth is that the men were not as experienced and the regretable crashes occured because of that. A similar incident/incidents did not result in a crash due to the response to the problem.
      Also, the issue itself was software, not parts related, I'm pretty sure.

    • @fabferrari
      @fabferrari 18 днів тому

      @@matthewmosier8439 I agree with you that we are facing a typical case of "Swiss cheese model" of accident cause. It's also a matter of fact that from the engineering standpoint the design concept was stretched way too much and it was used an "electronic trick" to overcome the technical issues. The lack of training was also part of the Boeing responsibility. In fact the investigation of the U.S. Department of Justice proved that Boeing advertised the new airplane as not needed to extra training for the pilots.

    • @tierra6391
      @tierra6391 7 днів тому

      @@HungPhamVan-ir6dt another delusional person. Who in their right mind would use anything from Boeing. Boeing is responsible for a number of accidents that cost the lives of hundreds of people and could have been avoided. News flash, China had nothing to do with it. This was all through the incompetency from Boeing. Look for another reason to trash talk the Chinese aircraft. Using Boeing is redundant as Boeing is now a dangerous manufacturing company. Only there for profits.

  • @tonythai5991
    @tonythai5991 18 днів тому +18

    They could call it C911!

    • @ronyap9746
      @ronyap9746 5 днів тому

      @@tonythai5991 is that a Chinese Porsche?

  • @raphaelgonzales8462
    @raphaelgonzales8462 18 днів тому +13

    That's what you get when you buy your airplane on temu😂😂😂😂

    • @mlee888
      @mlee888 18 днів тому

      Fly like a billionaire 🤣🤣🤣

  • @isaiahandreiaguibay8849
    @isaiahandreiaguibay8849 18 днів тому +13

    I know the doors in Boeing aircrafts can be ripped off after flight, but an airline that's made in China has a lot of red flags popping out of it

  • @chinesesparrows
    @chinesesparrows 19 днів тому +11

    Xi would rather fly on boeing than c919 🤣

    • @HaggiyoPilipinas
      @HaggiyoPilipinas 19 днів тому +6

      Exactly 😂

    • @peterantonic5216
      @peterantonic5216 16 днів тому

      @@chinesesparrows That is correct, he uses a Boeing 747-400 and he allowed North Korean Kim Jon Ul To use it to fly to Singapore for a meeting with then president Donald Trump about 4 years ago.

  • @kryts27
    @kryts27 18 днів тому +10

    C-dial 991. The wings probably will fall off mid-flight. Cardboard coffins for passengers come for free 😂

  • @daneurope9167
    @daneurope9167 18 днів тому +11

    even the chinese politburo and Xijing pi never fly this chinese planes..

    • @htee7426
      @htee7426 18 днів тому

      Of course not!

  • @lght5548
    @lght5548 18 днів тому +17

    Oh, hell no. I won't even buy a bicycle made there.😬

  • @I_SuperHiro_I
    @I_SuperHiro_I 18 днів тому +16

    A Chinese plane……..umm, no.

  • @zenon7094
    @zenon7094 19 днів тому +11

    In which planes does the CCP and state officials fly abroad? If these are not the planes thatChina itself produces, then there is something seriously wrong with them.

  • @davehue9517
    @davehue9517 18 днів тому +13

    With copied, stolen and borrowed parts and design.....no way I'd take a chance flying in it

    • @gregoriemorales9980
      @gregoriemorales9980 15 днів тому

      @@davehue9517 yes, but no not really its like drop shipping items its just old parts that western companies sell, like the LEAP-1C engine which is just a dumbed down version of the LEAP-1A found on newer A320Neos and 737max, it has more in common with the CFM56-5B which is like 90s tech

  • @rogerfroud300
    @rogerfroud300 18 днів тому +9

    The FAA can't even inspect Boeing to guarantee a safe product, so what chance do they have with a Chinese company?

  • @edwardbryan9501
    @edwardbryan9501 18 днів тому +8

    China is like that kid boasting about having built his own original Lego creation after following the instructions.

  • @user-ss4zj2sz7h
    @user-ss4zj2sz7h 18 днів тому +10

    I wouldnt fly on one. Boeing may have ssome ongoing issues but the amount of planes Boeing have flying internationaly and daily with jo issues ever speaks for itself.

    • @secretagentcat
      @secretagentcat 18 днів тому

      I wouldnt trust newer models from boeiny

    • @stevenhirsson795
      @stevenhirsson795 18 днів тому

      Haha … DEI HIRE … The DOORS FLY OFF 50,000 ft. HIGH … STILL LAUGHING

  • @terrieterblans7027
    @terrieterblans7027 18 днів тому +8

    If even 1 part on this plane is made by the same companies that makes Chinese EV's, it is a death trap .

  • @ookammi
    @ookammi 18 днів тому +7

    i dont care what certifications they end up buying, i will never fly on a chinese plane

  • @thedarkknight4243
    @thedarkknight4243 12 днів тому +12

    Made in China, Chineseum, Tofu plane, Boeing knock-off

  • @nvt6781
    @nvt6781 19 днів тому +6

    Vietnam: C919 is truly a “Beautiful Suicidal Machine”!

  • @edwinheringer8829
    @edwinheringer8829 18 днів тому +13

    Flying coffin from china free ride

  • @peterantonic5216
    @peterantonic5216 17 днів тому +11

    Tufu Dreg Airlines, who in their right mind would even consider flying in one? Just take a look at their famous BYD electric cars, no quality in materials or workmanship. BYD ( Burn Your Driveway) lost ten dealerships in China in the last 3 years due to their EV batteries going into thermal runaway and destroying everything. Would you really want to fly in the C919? 👎😳

  • @padgaprao2617
    @padgaprao2617 18 днів тому +9

    Made from the highest quality metal known to science …. Chinesium

  • @tlam23557
    @tlam23557 18 днів тому +9

    Việt Nam Airline should buy this only for high-level VN government officers to travel

    • @AndyTN64
      @AndyTN64 18 днів тому +1

      And only sell one way tickets

    • @funcuzchris4466
      @funcuzchris4466 18 днів тому

      Do you hate them?

    • @AndyTN64
      @AndyTN64 17 днів тому

      @@funcuzchris4466 Do you love them?

  • @lexmercatoria2774
    @lexmercatoria2774 18 днів тому +9

    Even if the Chinese get this first C919 plane certified, they'll cut corners on those coming off the assembly line afterwards.

  • @Lirang4nime
    @Lirang4nime 19 днів тому +7

    Damn, are they getting the rejected Boeing parts to build the plane?😂

    • @jimshoe402
      @jimshoe402 19 днів тому

      United tire just Fell Off But Don't worry they found it..

    • @fabferrari
      @fabferrari 18 днів тому

      No, they learnt from the Boeing mistakes and tried to improve the design.

    • @YourHineyness
      @YourHineyness 18 днів тому

      @@fabferrari Perhaps Boeing's mistake was buying Chinese parts.

  • @m.h.f3350
    @m.h.f3350 18 днів тому +8

    Bet, even Temu wouldn't distribute the C919 because it's too scammy 😂😂

  • @paulfuchs6920
    @paulfuchs6920 18 днів тому +10

    Flying coffin.

  • @brunojm7282
    @brunojm7282 18 днів тому +9

    C919 = 85% western parts and technology 15% Chinese Temu whatever parts

    • @Edwardianschool
      @Edwardianschool 18 днів тому

      Temu Airlines! 😅

    • @YourHineyness
      @YourHineyness 18 днів тому

      And the way I understand it, all of the parts on an airplane are rather important. So if 15% of them fail...

  • @Noducks4life
    @Noducks4life 19 днів тому +6

    Ryanair flights gonna get cheaper. But it’s the last flight you’ll ever take…

  • @controllerplayer1720
    @controllerplayer1720 18 днів тому +10

    C919 sounds like Covid September 2019.. C 9/19

    • @radiowolf3016
      @radiowolf3016 18 днів тому +1

      thats a good one, that one is too chineese made!

  • @rogerm4310
    @rogerm4310 18 днів тому +10

    I wouldn't fly in one of these dangerous junk heap flying coffins, no sir.

  • @curzon176
    @curzon176 18 днів тому +6

    You couldn't pay me enough money to take a flight anywhere in a Chinese made airplane. No way.

    • @vemaraju
      @vemaraju 18 днів тому

      Fly Boeing 😂

  • @lance8080
    @lance8080 18 днів тому +11

    Flying coffin 🇨🇳

  • @TigerUppercut.00
    @TigerUppercut.00 18 днів тому +6

    When you put a bunch of foreign parts together to make a plane.. it's just a "Made in China" plane.. it's not a "Chinese Made" plane..

  • @dbblues.9168
    @dbblues.9168 18 днів тому +11

    I wouldnt fly on a Boeing right now, I sure as heck wouldn't fly on CCP tofu airplanes.

    • @totzinfo
      @totzinfo 18 днів тому

      this channel is full bogus information and trolls of black propaganda, all info are reverted to appear negative views, C919 already pass all requirements and compliance to the global adaptation of reliability, performance and quality, that is why most airliners who owns of Boeing ill fated models with frequent crash in past few years are replacing their fleet with Comac C919

    • @totzinfo
      @totzinfo 18 днів тому

      it is not true that C919 components are mostly from U.S. and Europe because most parts and component of C919 is not compatible to western system including electronics and metallurgy, China now has the best ALUMINIUM ALLOYS ever produce compared to western countries, China's aluminium alloys use in COMAC C919 are 4x stronger and 2x lighter than the west can produce, even China's tensile steel are 2x stronger and .5x lighter than the western metals

    • @gaoxiaen1
      @gaoxiaen1 18 днів тому

      @@totzinfo 老王賣果!

    • @aliteralxoixeo21420
      @aliteralxoixeo21420 16 днів тому

      ill do you better how about airbus?

  • @johnhelms
    @johnhelms 18 днів тому +6

    I didn't see Xi flying in it,shouldn't the president show his people that it is safe?

  • @raphaelfrancis4509
    @raphaelfrancis4509 18 днів тому +3

    Imagine you are flying on a Chinese plane, and you saw one of the engine fall off.... 🤣🤣🤣

  • @Yummies_Honey
    @Yummies_Honey 18 днів тому +6

    Boing are just rusty Rolex planes
    But made in china planes are trash but shiney as frick😂

  • @misterbig9025.
    @misterbig9025. 18 днів тому +7

    China 🇨🇳 has a long history of copying planes, but failed to enter the market.
    -MA60, a copy of Antonov 🇺🇦 An-24
    -Y10, a copy of Boeing 🇺🇸 707
    -ARJ21, a copy of Douglas 🇺🇸 MD90
    and now
    C919, a copy of Airbus 🇪🇺 A320

  • @kwwong2893
    @kwwong2893 16 днів тому +6

    Without EASA and FAA certificarions, C919 can hardly get any international customer

  • @williamsue280
    @williamsue280 18 днів тому +7

    Buy quality not junk.

  • @ps3301
    @ps3301 18 днів тому +6

    Let them fly for 15 years before certification

  • @apsmith1635
    @apsmith1635 18 днів тому +9

    No flight for me in a CCP plane

  • @hunggiang1475
    @hunggiang1475 18 днів тому +15

    Let be realistic, China is not known for quality or safety.

    • @nfuryboss
      @nfuryboss 18 днів тому +1

      Indeed.

    • @G.A.C_Preserve
      @G.A.C_Preserve 17 днів тому

      @@nfuryboss it used to be an US tactic back in the Vietnam war with bullet that will explode the AK-47 (low chances), but now then china can do all of that Low Quality stuff even without the help of the USA

    • @murali5247
      @murali5247 11 днів тому +1

      That’s a myth . That’s what the westerners thought about japan before the war . If China can send people to space and bring them back, have space station , fantastic infrastructure which the west can only be jealous about etc.etc What quality do you want ? China makes products to suit your price ..consequently the quality is for the price you pay . Although China is now very assertive and at times behaves arrogantly ..... one must give credit where it’s due .. They seem to excel in everything they do - solar panels , drones , heavy equipment, power generation etc
      ,

    • @hunggiang1475
      @hunggiang1475 11 днів тому

      @@murali5247 westerners are the #1 consumers of made in China, I’m sure it’s from experience.

    • @darbas57
      @darbas57 10 днів тому

      @hunggiang1475 My friend had a shoe store where he sold better quality shoes from Spain, Germany, England, and e.t.c.
      One day, one of his suppliers came over and told him that they subcontracted their shoes to chinese. The quality improved over the years.
      Besides, before the industrial revolution, 25 % of the world's industrial output was chinese.

  • @secretagentcat
    @secretagentcat 18 днів тому +13

    BOYCOT CHINA

  • @alapaticornell4391
    @alapaticornell4391 18 днів тому +10

    Copy cats. Fake tofu Plane. The flying coffin. Fly at your onw risk😢.
    Blessings for Taiwan, Ukraine & Hong Kong.

    • @totzinfo
      @totzinfo 18 днів тому +1

      this channel is full bogus information and trolls of black propaganda, all info are reverted to appear negative views, C919 already pass all requirements and compliance to the global adaptation of reliability, performance and quality, that is why most airliners who owns of Boeing 737 ill fated models with frequent crash in past few years are replacing their fleet with Comac C919

    • @njikangclifford8259
      @njikangclifford8259 16 днів тому

      @@totzinfo Problem is the level of 'people' out here. They seem to find her the 'right place' to dump all their bitterness in life!

  • @funkyfreddurst
    @funkyfreddurst 18 днів тому +6

    Who would fly in a plane that has only 100 hours of testing. C919 belly landing all over the world.

  • @Ukie88
    @Ukie88 18 днів тому +9

    Don’t fly CCP air.

  • @SPYOPSUNDERGROUNDFOX
    @SPYOPSUNDERGROUNDFOX 18 днів тому +7

    WON'T EVER FLY IN THAT PC OF JUNK - FROM TUFO BUILDING -BRIDGES TO PLANES

    • @sugarcan1110
      @sugarcan1110 18 днів тому

      737 max c919 never had issues ....clown mate

  • @donaldsherman660
    @donaldsherman660 18 днів тому +7

    i wont fly on any chinese planes i would rather walk eventually ill make itif i stay off chinese planes

  • @TigerUppercut.00
    @TigerUppercut.00 18 днів тому +7

    I rather get on a Boeing than the C919.. 😁😁

  • @raphaelgonzales8462
    @raphaelgonzales8462 18 днів тому +15

    If it's made in china it must be crap😂😂😂

    • @u2ber888
      @u2ber888 18 днів тому +2

      @@raphaelgonzales8462 like ur iPhone crap made in ind!a today?

    • @raphaelgonzales8462
      @raphaelgonzales8462 17 днів тому

      @@u2ber888 hahahahahaha ULOL i dont use iphone like you it is a piece of SH!T

    • @Joachim4964
      @Joachim4964 13 днів тому

      Even crap has fertilizer value unlike Chinese low quality products.

    • @u2ber888
      @u2ber888 13 днів тому

      @@raphaelgonzales8462 jealousy counts. Not all expensive stuff made in the West are superior.

    • @raphaelgonzales8462
      @raphaelgonzales8462 13 днів тому

      @u2ber888 wrong!! Buy cheap and you get cheap and low quality especially made in china. . .it is full of 💩💩💩💩

  • @saasasasassasa
    @saasasasassasa 18 днів тому +6

    Everyone know it's junk. Please don't use the word "even"

  • @Hyper_NexusJunisBlue
    @Hyper_NexusJunisBlue 19 днів тому +5

    Vietnam Airlines rather buys Airbus A320neo

  • @PhilmiiNutsakz
    @PhilmiiNutsakz 18 днів тому +5

    VN ain't dumb. Lol.

  • @O530CarrisPT_C2
    @O530CarrisPT_C2 18 днів тому +5

    The FAA won't certify the C919 that easily.

  • @tarzan12345
    @tarzan12345 12 днів тому +5

    “Even” is not necessary here. The Vietnamese populace are among the most skeptical of China in the world so any airline in Vietnam operates Chinese-made planes, they will likely face a boycott so the airline bosses know it.

  • @rebeltheharem7028
    @rebeltheharem7028 18 днів тому +5

    The one thing you can't cheap out on is planes. Boeing knows. Ask them how it turned out.

    • @muffdiver4973
      @muffdiver4973 18 днів тому

      I would still rather fly in a Boeing than any Chinese built airplanes.

  • @sreed8570
    @sreed8570 17 днів тому +6

    No fan of communist China here, but its ironic how China becoming an assembler of aircraft with parts outsourced from other nations is a big issue but western nations doing the same thing with parts from China is perfectly fine.

    • @eh-269
      @eh-269 17 днів тому +1

      Yk how it is, irony at its finest, although ig it’s because if 100% Chinese made parts, which can get a bit sketchy😅compared to maybe 50% 50%. Also idk about the quality inspection there in China, but I’m not really trusting it with previous situations, although 100% of it can be said about Boeing too.

    • @mypartyisprivate8693
      @mypartyisprivate8693 16 днів тому

      Easy. Basic cheap parts are less sophisticated than complicated devices and systems.
      Outsourcing cheap parts to cheap labor markets made sense.

    • @mypartyisprivate8693
      @mypartyisprivate8693 16 днів тому

      Sorry, no irony.

  • @niccoarcadia4179
    @niccoarcadia4179 18 днів тому +5

    Looks like a 1959 DC-8

  • @metwo1492
    @metwo1492 18 днів тому +7

    Would never fly on tofu dreg airliner.

  • @salvatorequattrocchi2582
    @salvatorequattrocchi2582 18 днів тому +3

    The China C919 airliner is a “FLYING JUNK” riddled with serious flaws mechanically, reliability, maintenance factors all impacting safety. Airworthiness obviously is of highest priority which DOES NOT EXISTS today in China.

  • @wintersbattleofbands1144
    @wintersbattleofbands1144 18 днів тому +4

    Oh my. Back down to just one airworthy. SWEET! What a great win for China! One of SIX still flying. That's almost 17%!
    (17% is a passing grade in China.)

  • @khaid.5167
    @khaid.5167 18 днів тому +5

    As a Vietnamese, i would confirm that vietnam communist goverment don't have enogh money to buy, we are run out of money and have a lot troubles with debt too.

    • @tenglim4406
      @tenglim4406 18 днів тому +1

      It's kinda sad to hear that. Hopefully your country's situation will turn better soon. Anyhow, I last heard that the VA's financial situation is close to bankruptcy. Is that right?

    • @htee7426
      @htee7426 18 днів тому +1

      I hope, even if they had the money, they would consider value for money and safety issues which Chinese crap tends not to provide. These planes will probably spontaneously burst into flames like some of their EV cars.

  • @rho91
    @rho91 18 днів тому +4

    Tofu cannot maintain its integrity above 10k feet 🤣

  • @tommytomas-fr3sh
    @tommytomas-fr3sh 12 днів тому +5

    to be fair, comac is not really looking for a foreign market as their main task is to fulfill the Chinese domestic market which is already the second largest after the US. all these Europe and US certifications are just to boost their own prestige that their airplane is as good as Boeing and Airbus.

  • @NathanArnold-sf7gx
    @NathanArnold-sf7gx 17 днів тому +8

    Tofu dreg aircraft 100%

  • @maxhugen
    @maxhugen 18 днів тому +11

    Boeing is bad enough... but no way would I trust my life flying a piece of cobbled-together Chinese tofu. 😬

  • @jwholmes2
    @jwholmes2 18 днів тому +5

    Airbus produces three times as many narrow body commercial airliners in a month than COMAC has produced in 9 years. That’s pretty much all you need to know.

    • @njikangclifford8259
      @njikangclifford8259 16 днів тому

      And how old are both companies 'Mr arm-chair expert'? Aibus-1970; COMAC-2008 with several EUropean countries involved. with Some of them pioneers of Avaiation (ie over 100yrs experience), Took 4yrs to produce first their Aircraft
      COMAC-2008- China alone , little or no experience, first prototype -2015, maiden flight-2017. With your country and its lapdogs sparing no efforts to sabotage their progress, You being one such example of spreading false rumors and misinformation. Make no mistake! They'll get it eventually. It may be new to you, but you Americans stole all your Rocket and jet engine technology from the Germans after the second world war. They were light years ahead of every body in Rockets and jet engines. only the Brits came a bit close. Though they will have us think otherwise, Their first jet fighter , the Gloucester Meteor could not be trusted to make it over the Channel to France and back until the end of the war!

  • @S1337theoddoneout-ip9xc
    @S1337theoddoneout-ip9xc 18 днів тому +5

    If Xi "Winnie Pooh"Jinping goes on a grand tour of Asia and Europe flying only on the C919, i'll consider it fit for passenger transport. And we all know the Atacama desert will flood before Mr Pooh does that.

  • @user-nv5zi7tg6h
    @user-nv5zi7tg6h 18 днів тому +4

    made in china ? End of air travel 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • @k9killer221
    @k9killer221 18 днів тому +6

    Why do I have a lack of confidence in an utterly conventional small airliner that's taken 16 years to develop? And has two groundings on the first plane due to defects.

  • @madetgerardojr.e.3199
    @madetgerardojr.e.3199 18 днів тому +5

    Made in china pirates low quality😂

  • @EmmanuelleCn22
    @EmmanuelleCn22 18 днів тому +5

    🙂 look up in the sky it's a bird it's a plane no it's a flying junk from china 😅😂🤣😭

  • @bastiancooper-queen1849
    @bastiancooper-queen1849 18 днів тому +3

    Am only flying on Airbus, not anymore on Boeing and NEVER on a chinese one....don't want to stupidely dying.😊

  • @saeffareez3337
    @saeffareez3337 18 днів тому +6

    Even some body offered me everything full sponsored travel by C919 CCP's plane..i will definitely refuse the offer and never gamble when my life is at stake???😢😮

  • @PhilmiiNutsakz
    @PhilmiiNutsakz 18 днів тому +4

    Only if Xi flies in it around the world then i will believe it flies. Lol.

  • @torccchaser6712
    @torccchaser6712 19 днів тому +5

    Tofu Dreg 919

  • @stevec3526
    @stevec3526 17 днів тому +3

    If the Japanese and Mitsubishi can’t build a viable commercial airliner why do the Chinese think they can do it?
    Mitsubishi spent billions trying and ultimately failed.

  • @skysailing4355
    @skysailing4355 18 днів тому +4

    They should label it as Assembled in China.

  • @Hammerhead547
    @Hammerhead547 18 днів тому +3

    COMAC succeeded in creating the C919 by copying Airbus's 30 year old second gen A320 homework and simply changing the name on it.

  • @DrQuagmire
    @DrQuagmire 17 днів тому +5

    Couldn’t pay me to fly on that copied 2nd rate ‘made in China’ plane… a disaster waiting. 1/3 of the fuel efficiency as every other plane in its claimed class? Nooooope.. something is wrong with it.

  • @olivierdk2
    @olivierdk2 18 днів тому +4

    Boeing dosen't look that bad now.
    Maybe i've been a bit harsh with them.

    • @O530CarrisPT_C2
      @O530CarrisPT_C2 18 днів тому +1

      At least Boeing has the FAA that punishes Boeing for their safety lapses.

  • @renzverg119
    @renzverg119 17 днів тому +4

    Very risky investment. It's like buying a problem.

  • @MrDannyZ123
    @MrDannyZ123 18 днів тому +4

    If Boeing is having a hard time building planes awwww hell naaaa am i getting on a chinese plane

  • @JorgePerez-jg5cm
    @JorgePerez-jg5cm 18 днів тому +4

    Like most if not all Chinese products absolute garbage.

  • @Shinobubu
    @Shinobubu 18 днів тому +3

    Why choose a plane that has even fewer parts in stock and fewer people trained to maintain it? makes no sense.

  • @biggseye
    @biggseye 18 днів тому +7

    There is no way I would ever fly on that plane. It has to be a Chinese deathtrap.

  • @leechrec
    @leechrec 18 днів тому +3

    I expect China to find a way to pay off whoever is doing the inspection and verification.

    • @nicholasrockall7308
      @nicholasrockall7308 18 днів тому

      That's exactly what I was thinking too, or else they'll try to somehow blackmail the inspectors.

  • @rodolfovalero638
    @rodolfovalero638 18 днів тому +9

    CHINA MADE KITE😂😂😂😂

  • @georgeszurbach444
    @georgeszurbach444 18 днів тому +4

    This plane will never be certified by the EASA.

  • @meandshe1518
    @meandshe1518 18 днів тому +4

    Like their super-duper aircraft carrier, this craft is full of techology dating back 25+ years ago.

    • @gaoxiaen1
      @gaoxiaen1 18 днів тому +1

      China's aircraft carriers almost caught up with US technology... from WWII.

  • @richardincm
    @richardincm 18 днів тому +4

    Up to Vietnam, whether they want to buy/lease this plane, or not ? And China has been assembling B737s & A320s for some time now, also the C919 is approximately 50% foreign-parts, this is by-no-means 100% Chinese-made, despite what they might wish to project. Airbus & Boeing took several decades to reach their current dominant positions in the industry.

  • @vichyfrance7062
    @vichyfrance7062 18 днів тому +4

    Man this I just a knockoff Airbus, this is no better

  • @Gw2kitty
    @Gw2kitty 18 днів тому +5

    Which part of C919 is made of reinforced bamboo, does it have toilets or people just relieve themselves on the aisles.

    • @kennydude7971
      @kennydude7971 18 днів тому

      😂

    • @YourHineyness
      @YourHineyness 18 днів тому

      Hey now, they have restrooms. It's a hole in the floor that you squat over.

    • @ActiveAussie2024
      @ActiveAussie2024 18 днів тому

      They sell gutter oil dumplings before the people relieve themselves.

  • @samrhecker9636
    @samrhecker9636 18 днів тому +6

    it's an Airbus A-300 series copycat with substandard quality

    • @Krazycat321
      @Krazycat321 18 днів тому

      It’s actually a McDonald’s Douglas plane that they started to set up in the china and after Boeing bought them, they deserted the plant and left all the tooling for the Chinese to absorb and they still couldn’t get it right😂😂

  • @Nivethi-143
    @Nivethi-143 12 днів тому +6

    yes of course, cheaper and poor quality, i m not wondering about that. Made in China 😅🤣😇

    • @galaxymode
      @galaxymode 12 днів тому +2

      Unlike 737 max it hasn’t fall off the sky

  • @user-munm
    @user-munm 18 днів тому +3

    Plane looks like a one-to-one copy of Bombardier CSeries CS300

    • @O530CarrisPT_C2
      @O530CarrisPT_C2 18 днів тому +1

      I wonder what would have been the name of the Bombardier CSeries if the program was bought by COMAC. Maybe C909-100 (for the CS100) and C909-300 (CS300)?

  • @cerverg
    @cerverg 18 днів тому +4

    Guys that plane is not what everybody thinks it is... there so many western parts and I'm not even talking about the engines and it's still shit