What Future Historians Will Think Of Us In 100 Years - How History Works
Вставка
- Опубліковано 4 жов 2024
- if someone has ever said the following to you then you know you're dealing with a narcissistic douchebag
"Don't Be On The Wrong Side Of History"
Despite how easy it is to look back over the course of human history for all the progress that's been made it's a highly simplistic mind that thinks everything was a black and white fight between good and evil.
------
#HowHistoryWorks #History
Link To My Other Channel: / howmoneyworks
Video Created By: Arun Singh
Footage Courtesy of: Getty Images
Music Provided By: Epidemic Sound
For sponsorship inquiries, please contact sponsors@worksmedia.group
"It's a rather revealing paradox, that as our tech drives us apart, we find a unifying solace in returning to nature". - The How Money Works Guy (2022 A.D)
Channeling my inner Shakespeare on that one
Almost like we all live on the same natural planet or something
You’re an optimist to think that anyone will remember a UA-camr in a hundred years, even an awesome one as this one.
Or that more than a few hundred UA-cam videos will be preserved…
@@HowHistoryWorks I would like to point out that you only mentioned things that historians 100 years from now will hate about us, and mentioned nothing of what they will have appreciated about us. Even though we all know that Colonial England was a hell hole in a number of ways, we all still appreciate the Industrial Revolution for giving us better access to luxuries and technological advancements.
? What's a paradox is how anyone would be misguided enough to think solace or return is being found in an ever depleting ever polluting and being less visited or used nature. This is just another example of misguided controlled opposition.
I will never get over wanting a jetpack
Water driven jetpacks exist at least
Same. They're too cool to give up.
@@tomlxyzThere water jetpack, fire jetpack and air jetpack. We now need earth/soil powered jetpack to summon the avatar.
The first time I watched Iron Man, I changed... for the better.
10:44 After reading The Art of War, I came to the conclusion that war was always about business.
Yep. It was always about expanding GDP
Many wars were ideological
Why does this only have a couple hundred views? This is brilliantly edited, i wonder how long till this gets an algorithm recommendation and blows up
It’s a new spin off from their very successful channel how money works, check it out
10k
oct 25 22 13,750 从 m
Now.
This comment didn’t age well
This is the first channel I've ever got to find before they blew up big! Ha! I can't wait to see you guys hit a million subscribers! I guarantee it won't take long!
seen a couple i guess the algorithm just blesses me, but def agree this channel’s insight, analytics, evidentiated takes, humor, and graphics is top tier and def worthy of millions of subs. i agree that this is gonna blow up (he already does have another channel that’s pretty big tho too - HMW) reminds me of wendover productions or real life lore
I would love a video about the library of Alexandria and whether or not it actually lost humanity centuries of technological progress when it was destroyed as some people claim. I would like to hear your no non-sense take on it. Love your work both here and on how money works keep it up!!
From what I know, technically yes, but the Library was on the decline and a lot of stuff got moved. It was bad in that it was historic and books were rare, so burning any was a big thing, but it’s been overblown a bit.
@@Fly-the-Light From my understanding, the Library was a first concept of copying all books that they could find, and it was something impressive for everyone that it left a sense of legend related to the Library. By the time it was destroyed, it had a massive collection of literary commentaries, more than the actual books as it was inhabited by poets and thinkers that had to prove their worth, even the commentaries had commentaries, you get the point. There were many copies of all the books spread around the ancient world, the loss wasn't that big, but the idea of some rare findings which gathered dust in the library which we'll never know, created this collective paranoia.
If there was any technologies in those books, they wouldve been made by someone else before the burning
@@subotai-m3eI bet 90% of the stuff that was lost was either Theological or Mythical like old folktales or the writings of a now long forgotten Monk
apparently, you're going to drop out of your day job soon and focus on the channels full time, I hope you expand into multiple industries and always keep the perspective of the finance background in all of them.
wish you all the success!
Thanks for the kind words my friend!
The one thing about the future I can be certain of is that the majority of the people will think they are more free and virtuous than they actually are, and the few people smart enough to know better are also smart enough to keep their mouths shut.
Yeah because you’re obviously so smart and better than everyone else
oh so smart person i praise you fir bestowing us your so smart thoughts
The people in 2500 reading this: 👀
It's almost like human nature remains the same throughout time.
Yes it does but that's heresy to some philosophies.
Is it just me or does this look and feel similar to how money works?
That guy sucks tbh
😎
it be the same fella, with an interest in ancient stuff
@@contemplore It be that fella
@HowHistoryWorks
More channels like this, please. One for each subject.
How math works
How science works
How Politics works
Etc😊
Note that nowadays' critique of the cognitive impact of technology is strickingly similar with those formulated by Socrates' or Zhuang Zi's early testimonies about the diffusion of writing.
Philosopher G. Simondon argued we need to reset our whole conception of technique and humanize our vision of technical objects.
On the other hand I m just randomly scrolling ytube.
I think this assumes that future generations will learn from our mistakes which I honestly seriously doubt
I'm sure they'll screw things up just as badly as we do.
This specific episode, of this fine gentleman's excellent work, is, to me, the finest justification of why the internet needs to exist. No joke.
To quote Meatload, "You took the words right out of my mouth!" As you were talking about the plethora of informative material on the Web, I thought to myself, "Yeah, but most people only want to watch the Kardashians and cat videos." Then, you mentioned cat videos and the Kardashians.
"Electric Cars are replacing polluting Vehicles"
Well this aged badly.
One thing I always wonder is if artificial meat becomes a thing, folks in the future will probably think were despicable for confining animals in factories...
Many already did. Buddhist monks are traditionally vegetarian. Jainists cannot harm any animal, even flies.
It's hard for people to put themselves in the animals POV as much as it was hard for many non-enslaved to put themselves in the enslaved POV.
Bold of you to assume future people will care about any of that.
Factory farms will not look good for us 👀
“Electric cars are a thing now.” That depends on where you live.
9:34 I never expected to see someone quote Solid Snake in anything like this. But like the massive nerd I am I have to say that I'm afraid the quote is wrong. Solid Snake says that "War has changed" which is a reocuring theme in the Metal Gear games, how war has moved from boots on the ground to electronic warfare, misinformation, drones and automated mechanical warfare. The quote "War never changes" when it gomes to video games is the mantra of the Fallout series, who often run with the theme that war is inevitable and no matter what weapons you use, the senlessness of war remains the same, that even after the world as we know it has ended, we still insist on waging war over the ashes.
As a side note, many acredits the saying as having originally been uttered by Ulysses S. Grant, former US General and president, who supposedly have said "I have never advocated war except as means of peace, so seek peace, but prepare for war. Because war... War never changes" but the validity of what few sources there is to back this up is dubious at best.
I doubt future historians will judge us all that hard, the more things change the more they stay the same. I dont forsee the invention of anything at the same the level of the internet. The early internet certainly was different from what we have now, but not radically different.
But since the more things change the more they stay the same we currently judge the past the same way the future will judge us. We laugh at the thought that the lobotomy was ever treated as a proper medical procedure, we laugh at how the people in the past had asbestos in their walls and lead in their gasoline.
But the present day has its own dubious medical procedures, + the fact that big pharma will prescribe harmful drugs for anything and everything, and also theres plastic in our blood and pollution in the air which are alot harder to fix than asbestos and leaded gas.
20 years before the internet nobody was foreseeing anything on the level of the internet...
@@talknight2 David Bowie did
@@talknight2
People deep in the field could have predicted it by the late 50s, early 60s. By the mid to late 60s, the first version of the internet for the military called ARPANET was made to combat the Soviet Union in communications ability. And from then, advancements kept coming and pushing that snowball down the hill until the modern internet was released to the public in the 90s. The internet was a project involving hundreds of people spanning three full decades. It's amazing.
History does not have sides. Kudos to you for the video.
Great video. Here's a comment so the algorithm notices. Not that I know how that thing even works
Thank you. This is a response for the algorithm.
@@HowHistoryWorks A response to that response. Please notice me Algorithm senpai
10:33 bruh really presented NATO without Canada...
Love your new channel, great contact. You are one of my top 10 UA-camrs
Sleek skyscraper with nanotechnology! "No sewer system"
I'm so happy to have found your channel. One day You'll hit a million subscribers and I'll be one of them. Great video
An interesting place for the "right side of history" I'm noticing is gambling addiction: The most hardline anti-gambling people will say gambling will be treated like smoking in the future, and will follow a path of increasing awareness of its danger, suppression of studies, calls for regulatio and so on.
On morality, I used to think grey morality is a deep and nuanced view of the world, until I start to notice the worst of business and national leaders disregarding human life and get away of being child predators.
after nuclear war, people with no tech will say that we believed in magic . and that we had strange rituals for getting food.
Cat videos are the lifeblood of modern human societies.
Society was created by cats so they could have cushy lives. Agriculture? Cats. Civilization? Cats. Beds? Cats. Internet? Cats. The only things we invented were veterinarians and doors.
I think you can easily argue that ethics have gradually shifted toward equality the more informed and educated societies become.
One can absolutely infer whether they're on the right side of history.
All things move toward balance.
Agreed, it's quite easy to see who will be on the right side of history with certain things like civil rights issues. If you look at polls from back in 2004 a strong majority of the country opposed same sex marriage, and yet polls also showed that a strong majority also believed that it was inevitable that same sex marriage supporters would eventually win even though they were clearly in the minority. So I don't think it's too hard to infer from numbers like that that people back then (including opponents of same sex marriage) knew that supporters of same sex marriage would be seen as being on the right side of history.
This video is what you hear when you're not able to think anymore, go to sleep, but need to keep thinking until you fall asleep
Burial Goods has a great “be a historian in 3023” video
I don't know. There's every reason to believe all these trends will continue and become exacerbated. The reason we hear about them a lot now is that there are lots of people who remember the world before the effects of social media. I think historians in the future are more likely to only work between watching the future equivalent of mindless tiktoks to try and keep their dopamine-resistant brains alive.
Unfortunately, you may have recency bias. History and human psychology is always cyclical. Most humans believe that things will simply be a more technologically advanced version of today - that is, we believe we will continue in the current trend forever. Usually, the world of the near future is the OPPOSITE of what we believe, do, and think today. Republican dominance for a decade results in Democratic dominance in the next decade. Individualism today means collectivism tomorrow. GI generation that fought WWII upheld collectivist values of duty and sacrifice; the Boomer generation embodied self discovery, indulgence, and individualism. Think about how just one generation ago, the US was so united/patriotic and rallied behind the government in the War on Terror; and now most young Americans hate America and we are so divided politically and socially. So on and so forth.
In a generation, we will likely be living in the opposite of the world we see today. It's a law of nature. What goes up, must go down. What goes down, must come up. We live in the best era in human history, having daily warm showers, fully stocked fridges of food or delivery on demand, and access to unlimited entertainment and pleasure at our fingertips. We live better than kings of the past. This means that hard times are ahead. Guaranteed.
If you've been in the stock market before, I'll remind you of the quote that people often say at the top of a massive bull run "this time is different - we're gonna keep progressing upwards", you know it's time to exit! Trend reversal soon. But of course one day we will be back to today's values and behaviors.
10:21 shouldn't Canada be included on the map since they are also a part of NATO?
It should
At least they're usually on maps. New Zealand is always forgotten. Just empty ocean. 🇭🇲
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
Those that care would know that that's not even the New Zealand flag. This is the new zealand flag 🇳🇿 😅
Thank you, sir, for your insights. Keep up the good work of giving out free education via the Internet!
Now we are born in ignorance, and die in ignorance.
Getting away from the philosophizing of Ancient Greece?! This is a terrible take that suffers from the same, "Today is so terrible because people believe X, we should go back to this particular mythical time that I can imagine as perfect in my mind despite the fact it would fall apart under the most shallow questioning," attitude that he complains about.
This channel will blow up for sure
I felt that what you said about politics had nothing to do with my own experience. Is it posible that you are talking from your own (American?) personal experience instead of talking from the perspective of experts on the topic?
He seems like an "Enlightened Centrist"
I do see the same thing happening in europe and south america
@@jasonhaven7170 his background in finance prevents much else. Finance education is a kind of indoctrination (like most education)
Our current period will not be envied by any person from any timeperiod -
1940's German Jews: Are we a joke to you?
(2:20) Basically, it is hard of us to imagine what kind of new technology would appear or how culture will shift. We are bound by the limitations on what we can experience and observe.
If you look into the upcoming medical advancements we might just be reminded as the last great dying, there might be humans born today witch might live for thousands of years. Seems unreal , but the rate of increase in life expectancy is 1 year each seven years, but that rate is closing, meaning it was 1 to 10, then to 1 to 9, then 1 to 8. If the pattern holds, when it reaches 1 to 1 then most people literally stop dying.
Also machine super-intelligence seems inevitable, at that point we might as well be regarded as children who didn't know better .
Nah, humans believe that the future is just an extrapolation of current trends, when it's usually the opposite. This is known as recency bias. As someone in the medical field, I can tell you that this upward trajectory forever will not be the case. Nature always corrects to the mean. Our advancements in the past 100-150+ years since the creation of antibiotics and advent of germ theory will not continue forever. Rise of superbugs/antibiotic resistance, pandemics, climate change, water shortage, wars and biological warfare will decrease life expectancy by a massive scale in the next 50 years or so. And then afterwards it will rise again, but it will feel like the end of the world during this era.
Future person:
"They really wouldn't let a whole quarter of the population vote? And the reasons were the same as the ones they used to deny women the vote (eg wont understand issues, just vote the way of their parent/spouse)? Aren't children citizens too?"
Voting won’t matter when the robots take over humanity
Remind me in 2040 to come back
8:25 Objectivity has never existed. The major change here is the erosion of trust in institutions. Which, can you really blame people for not trusting “objective” institutions?
There is well-documented evidence of governments lying to their own citizens and acting against their citizens’ interests throughout history. There is also plenty of evidence showing corruption in many of the largest corporations in the world.
I’m not saying that algorithms and echo chambers are better, but I do think the notion that “objectivity” has ever existed is flawed.
I'd argue that objectivity has always existed, just noever at an institutional level. Even when the ideal of objectivism began taking root in academia, institutions often ended up promoting things that where subjective out of carelesness, even those who where seeking objectivity. We have plenty of individuals and groups that seek objectivity and seek to teach through that. I think you are right that the major change is trust in those institutions but not because objectivity never axisted but that we are now more aware than ever of how said objectivity we seek is absent from those institutions.
I also believe that we now seek objectivity more than ever, and the demad for those institutions to embrace objectivity doesn't just come from academia anymore but from the laymen and general population as well, making the call much louder. There will never be absolute objectivism in any institution, after all what does a politician have to gain from it, and misstakes will always be made, and I think we have to make peace with that, but hopefully this change will lead to more institutions, especially those in academia, to return to seeking out that objectivism we want and hold it as the true ideal rather than simply saying so as lip service in a vain attempt at saving face and protecting trust.
It sounded for a second there that Thomas Sowell was quote-referencing Solid Snake, which made me frantically google
it would be crazy if the wall e movie came true
Bold of them to think I care what future history will think of me.
2023: Still no jet packs.
9:37 What the actual F….
This has to be some ironic commentary on how recent trends promote Sowell for revisionist purposes.
Regarding education, I'd argue that our present society makes it difficult to actually put that education to use. I could study neuroscience and still not be qualified for a job in that field without paying an obscene amount of money to get a piece of paper saying I studied it. I think that most people don't utilize the information we have at our fingertips, but those who do don't have the privilege to put that knowledge to use. I can't afford a good education, so I can't get a good job. It has more to do with overcomplicated processes than it does a lack of motivation. I think people are apathetic because everything is easy, yet anything actually useful is incredibly difficult to the point that it may not even be worth it.
You should have just put the Colonel speech at MGS2.
Ah! missed opportunity
this must be played in all schools
Brilliant analysis.
Tech brought us too close together and now we are can’t stand each other. Nobody needs to know every single thing we share on the internet.
You my friend are a gift to humanity. If you're ever open to it, I would love to interview for my newsletter/writing. I've recommended your things many times and I think there would be a lot to share
What happens if i only watch videos that are 10-60 minute long video?
Great content!
Thanks again, Joseph!
The ideas of women's rights vs trans women's rights, and military members fighting for countries that aren't their home countries, and so on... There's a lot of good stuff in this video.
Unbelievably based video
Why do you think it's biased?
There's no way Thomas Sowell mentioned Solid Snake in his LIFE lmao
Depends on which country you are talking about
If it's a Us-centred question, you really cannot predict...
Maybe they will admire that we had a high standard of living compared to the future generations (Maybe)
They will be jealous to see how less we had to study (Certainly)
They will feel glorious to see that the US used to be the sole/dual superpower of the world (certain)
They will be surprised at how the economy grew 2%-3% every year rather than 0.1% (certain)
Surprised that most of the world had inflation as opposed to the current (their POV) situation of decades long deflation (a la Japan).
Surprised that no one openly called hypocrisy at the US for doing everything they accuse others of doing (meddling in elections, annexing territory, staging referenda, assassinating foreign leaders and conducting coups, etc).
Surprised that 22% of the vote could get someone elected and still be called a majority, as long as the opponents only got 21% or less (first pass the post as used in US, Canada, UK, etc).
IDK if the math and everything is completely in on massive amounts of electric cars being better than, say, using more biofuel in ice vehicles.
i literally had this exact question
Solid Snake LITERALLY SAID "WAR HAS CHANGED" ya dingus!
10:25 hey why isn't Canada highlighted in this map because we are one of the founding members of NATO and have no signs of leaving any time soon
1:06 "... or even mashing f5 to see how many views it's gotten"
How have past ideals led to current life
You speak about getting "cancelled" like it's a new thing or that it's worse than ever. Never heard of the Crusades? The Spanish Inquisition? The Salem Witch Trials? What about village stonings?...
The idea that "Cancel Culture" is new or "as bad as ever" shows a lack of historical understanding. Not good for a history channel. We've always had it and always will.
Honestly, I don't think the environmental issues of today are going to be all that important in the future. It's not that climate change isn't real or anything like that, but rather I think that there are going to be much more grave concerns, even in the near future. The price of fertilizer has increased significantly in the last year, and will likely continue to increase even more, which will make it inaccessible in sufficient quantities for many developing countries, which will in turn reduce the agricultural output. This would essentially be a reversal of the green revolution, and would result in massive famines in the poorer parts of the world. That would be a civilization killer and that alone would be enough to end our globalized world.
Secondly much of the developed world has experienced collapsing birth rates beginning 50 years and the advanced developing world has experienced the same thing beginning 30 years ago. The recent rates of immigration have not fixed this problem for almost all of europe, and the rates needed to maintain economic continuity would be so high as to threaten societal collapse by itself. China's one-child policy has absolutely gutted their birth rate, and their population could decrease by half within as little as 30 years.
In that horrific scenario, the population of the world would significantly decline, economic output would crash along with it, and carbon emissions along with that, Climate change wouldn't be an issue, because there would be many far more severe things threatening the standard of living of most humans.
Agreed. Most humans believe the future is an extrapolation of current values and behaviors, when it usually becomes the opposite. Most humans have recency bias. Current green movement is not sustainable.
Population growth/decline isn't as black and white as you make it out to be. There's problems both in endless population growth and in a shrinking population.
They’ll think we’re nutcases, that’s what they’ll think.
I freaking love this video!!! omg
I feel like you would find the social scientist robin hanson interesting: try checking his research out, and his book “elephant in the brain”
Jared is Morgans Freeman voice for UA-cam! Love u guys
Just watch end of Planet of apes. Charlton Heston screaming You maniacs. That is possible future
8:01 glass half empty view. At least there's not physical fighting between the 2 political sides, and we have some democracy. that doesn't seem gaurenteed in the future, so they may envy us
Vegetarianism, not veganism has become somewhat popular. Vegetarianism means not meat, eggs milk or dairy. Veganism means being vegetarian and not using any products of animal origin. (no leather belts, shoes, furniture, wallets, jackets, no fur, no wool). Large scale vegetarianism is probable not sustainable, reducing meat consumption is.
Furniture made of animals wtf
4:05 our technology has always been inseparable from our experience, take agriculture
They're going to think we're a bunch of liars and thieves some even worst
They would be so confused and no idea how to explain us
Dear How History Works:
This is a nice video but the statement:
6:03 "are we even using it? shure you're here, don't forget to subscribe,
but the fact that we rather watch cat video's and the Kardashians will not go unnoticed for those whom come after us"
Is uncharitable to say the least.
Not only do we need to consume data,
we also need to intergrate the information.
Otherwise we forget or even overload.
As a future historian, 11+ months into the future from which this video was first viewed, I can tell you that Human Rights, Evolution, and Critical Thinking, were never science, and still are not. In another 11 months I will invent a time machine to transport a canister into which I can seal in these basic facts, so I can punt it back into your thick skull.
I don't expect it to enlighten you, but I hope it'll hurt.
A granola bar, a peanut granola bar
I'm still trying to figure out how to get laid without human interaction that you talked about. Without human interaction (but counting oneself obviously), it's not getting laid, it's having happy time.😅
I mean, without human interaction at all (including oneself), I guess you can go to the phone settings and try out the vibrate 😂
Without a shadow of a doubt, the thing that future historians will be most shocked about is the way we treat animals today. We torture and kill over 80 billion animals per year, not including the 1.3 trillion fish
Nice, Boston Baked Beans
They will wonder why we say we care so much about the planet but went away from nuclear.
Why would anyone fight a war for Lithium when so many alternative exist. What will be looked back how dumb we were for not developing nuclear power sooner since it takes up such a small foot print and can be develop in such a way to generate nearly any waste products.
I think that they wont care more than just a few marking things. Yes, maybe a very well educated historian will remember the dates of the vietnam war and it's consequences and bla-bla-bla, but most people will remember as much of this as we, uneducated masses remember of the Portuguese dicoveries: "there was a guy that sailed arround africa because spices were expensive". There, there you have 100 years of portuguese politics, protests, love and disgrace, heyday and decline. A few ones will learn about the details, but the people will just not care.
5:23 did not age well lol
Here's some little bit of fish food for the algorithim.
I really don't think it's smart to ever quote thomas sowell
4:55 have some respect you're talking about upcoming (technically returning back to) world superpower 🇮🇳. Don't be on the wrong side of history 😁
Quoting Thomas Sowell is kinda suspect…
As a 15 year old I have two probably wrong critiques of this video, 1. Electric cars are bad for the environment too and the pollution caused by the energy needed to dig up the resources needed to make a battery for one is way more than the pollution a normal car will make in its life time
2. This videos kinda weird cause you’re sounding like you think that one day we’ll all be united and have the exact same thoughts which no hate will never happen and has never happened and no one expects that to happen. Honestly a society where everyone thinks the same things is probably bad
Oh and also you have some really cliche opinions about the internet. I hate when people complain about being canceled n shit because that only happens to famous people. The people who complain about getting canceled will have like 3 followers on Twitter, tweet the n word and complain when they get backlash. Only famous people get canceled and it’s when they either groom a kid or say a billion slurs. Usually anyone complains about cancel culture or how they can’t say anything online anymore are just really racist or sexist or homophobic and get mad when someone tells them that’s not ok and you’re just kinda coming off in that way. Also the internet isn’t that bad, calm down the internets not ending the world. And do you want unity or not? The only way to get unity today would be with the internet but apparently the internets ruining society according to you
Yeah you know some shit but you can’t yap for 10 minutes about society and the internet when you clearly haven’t had a positive conversation in years
I agree
I would like to add some that is not talked about in this video:
1. Western civilization's self-flailing, and constant white guilt
2. Sugar addiction
3. The openness and lack of punishment for casual sex,
4. left-right swiping dating sites
5. the fear of masculinity and femininity
6. How Islam was practiced (e.g. Iran and Saudi Arabia, which if you had interacted with a lot of muslims, you can tell they detest and actively distance themselves from the way Islam and Syariah Law is currently being conducted, aka a reform/restructure of Islam will be seen, a revised version of the Prophet's life, and i also can see a new religion taking over and replace Islam)
7. The fear of China and any other country other than the USA will overtake USA in 100 years. (Except for Russia, Russia's fear of China can totally be justified, good luck Russia, I hope there is still a united Russia before i die, i really like Russians and Russian culture ;-; )
Anyways, I think i made a comment that will make me be exiled from my own Country or even have my life threatened. Good luck bois :) We'll meet again. Out.
With collapsing fertility rates, people of the future are going to value human life much more and be absolutely horrified that we allowed abortion. They are going to view abortion as a worse evil than slavery.
Hmmm...have you ever wondered if maybe, maybe the ultra-rich don't even seem that smart, because the real leaders already left?
Handed these guys the keys, and instructions to basically salt the earth, and encourage anti-generative social behaviors...you know, basically the plot of that weird 1970's sci-fi, "Zardoz", with Sean Connery?
"The 🔫 is good! The 🍆 is evil!"
Maybe it's "reverse aliens".
"We" are the 👽, but in the future...when they come back 🛸
After...you know, the thing...💥🔥🌋🌪️⚡🌊☄️
And you and I have become 🙊🙉🙈
if we keep the current pc/ cancel culture further historian's will say nothing because they are afraid to be cancelled ^^
Feels like somebody is on Andrew Tate side😂
Legal prostitution:)