I just recently found out these rods and I've made an observation that u can only find videos of these rods from years ago such as this one. There isn't any new videos. Strange
Probably because they were debunked as insects. The only people I see left talking about them are people thinking they're 4th dimensional beings or alien aircraft when you can easily just record a bug with a shitty camera and recreate the results.
A lot of topics/videos are just....gone. On this domain...NOT the only Search Engine, it is the largest...there is a directive for removing "invalid" info, known as Borderline Content.
It's a bug.. it's a bug that's close to the camerathe lines that you see there are going perpendicular to the rod are the wings flapping it's a blur from the camera even with a slow motion camera it's hard to pick this up because of the way the light hits the bug
You're right. If it was a flying rod, the 'wings' would be alternating on each side of the organism instead of being symmetrical. In this video, the 'wings' are directly opposite each other, which probably implies that it was just the image of a bug with symmetrical wings.
I just recently found out these rods and I've made an observation that u can only find videos of these rods from years ago such as this one. There isn't any new videos. Strange
I think that's because nobody knows about them. I've only ever seen 1 show they talked about them on and that was years ago.
I'm only here cause of S.O.
@@alanbedlyon6334
what are you talking about ?
do yuu even know whats behind this visual result ?
Probably because they were debunked as insects. The only people I see left talking about them are people thinking they're 4th dimensional beings or alien aircraft when you can easily just record a bug with a shitty camera and recreate the results.
A lot of topics/videos are just....gone.
On this domain...NOT the only Search Engine, it is the largest...there is a
directive for removing "invalid" info, known as Borderline Content.
Jojo's reference
Skyfish
いつか捕まえたいと思うのは俺だけ？
これはスカイフィッシュではないと思います。スカイフィッシュの羽根は頭から尾までつながっていて濃淡もありません。虫か鳥だと思います。
スカイフィッシュの正体は蝿。
細長く写るのは、シャッター速度が遅い為に起こる残像現象。
genndaino そういう洗脳が一昔前には、流行ってたっけ。この手の情報操作は何の目的か知らんけど鵜呑みにしない方が。現代の最高レベルの高性能カメラのコマ送り再生でも、完全な姿が捉えられてるから。この手の動画は情報鎖国の日本では、すぐに消されるけど、海外サイトでは、まあまあ残ってる
It's a bug.. it's a bug that's close to the camerathe lines that you see there are going perpendicular to the rod are the wings flapping it's a blur from the camera even with a slow motion camera it's hard to pick this up because of the way the light hits the bug
You're right. If it was a flying rod, the 'wings' would be alternating on each side of the organism instead of being symmetrical. In this video, the 'wings' are directly opposite each other, which probably implies that it was just the image of a bug with symmetrical wings.
You are wrong. Jose Escamilla filmed the first Rod in 1994 ... and many people film around the planet ... try to film too ... it is better after 5 pm
It is not a bug. Obvious
this is not english
yes its bugs ..there is a guy in the swamp surrounded by thousands of rods then he shows all the flies swarming ...
いいですね！
A flying moth. This effect is caused by low shutter speed of the camera
I have footage from dozens of kilometers high. Moths do not fly dozens of kilometers high ...
@@IrineuMigottonmw ua-cam.com/video/C35-kwXJmkU/v-deo.html
check this out
@@user-ei5oj8wf6q , check this, please ==>> ua-cam.com/video/JT8st1snjzw/v-deo.html
Definitely NOT a moth.
ズームじゃなくて拡大ですね。 正確には、、、
少しヒゲが出てる
Disparale con un rifle
Acusalo con tu mama Upasika Biblio.
Fake.
Not "fake". Flying rods aren't "fake", just misidenfitifed. They're just insects recorded by a camera with a low enough shutter speed.
@@thebenancesmodesartis fake .
I’ve rarely seen moths fly in straight lines