At 6:30 I'm really glad you didn't edit this part out. I was eating breakfast and had this video on in the background, and I didn't start paying close attention until you admitted you made a mistake in not deciding first if you need to discuss UCC or common law. This really humanized the presentation of otherwise technical contracts material, and it will definitely stick in my mind as I sit for the exam. It was a great learning moment. Thank you for the honesty. It is a valuable teaching lesson.
Every time I think about res ipsa, I think back to Torts 3 years ago and hear, "Burn versus BOWdull. Burn versus BOWdull." Try not saying it out loud lol. This guy is a lifesaver. Better than 90% of law professors
Why don't law schools talk about Mike and Studicata? I'm here in 2020 getting ready for Feb exam and this is LYFE!!! shot out to all the covid examinees!!!
Hi Michael, do you mention in your lectures that the acceptance must be communicated to the offeror or did I happen to miss that. You did mention many times that the offeror must communicate offer to the offeree.
Yes, the offeree must communicate his acceptance to the offeror. However, under the mailbox rule, an *ACCEPTANCE* that is sent by mail, email, or fax is valid at the moment of dispatch (*NOT* when the letter is received), unless: the offeree-sender uses the wrong address or has improper postage (e.g., forgets to put a stamp on the envelope); the offeror stipulates that the acceptance is valid upon receipt; an option contract is involved; the offeree-sender sends a termination letter *BEFORE* the acceptance letter (e.g., a counteroffer or rejection letter); *OR* the offeror detrimentally relies on a termination *BEFORE* he receives the acceptance letter. If an exception applies, then the acceptance becomes effective at the moment the offeror receives the acceptance. Thus, an acceptance _can_ become valid before the offeror receives the acceptance letter or otherwise has knowledge of the acceptance. This can create all kinds of interesting fact patterns. More info: ua-cam.com/video/GQ0VfUU3U9s/v-deo.html
Mike? Lol. I wrote the fucking book on contracts, civ pro, constitutional law, real property, gifts, criminal law and criminal procedure, employment discrimination, civil rights litigation, federal courts, sorry trying to remember alk the classes I took and my grades in law school. So Mike:
![Business Associations Bar Review (Partnership): Most Tested Areas of Law on the Bar Exam [PREVIEW]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/akTm6LCzbRo/mqdefault.jpg)
At 6:30 I'm really glad you didn't edit this part out. I was eating breakfast and had this video on in the background, and I didn't start paying close attention until you admitted you made a mistake in not deciding first if you need to discuss UCC or common law. This really humanized the presentation of otherwise technical contracts material, and it will definitely stick in my mind as I sit for the exam. It was a great learning moment. Thank you for the honesty. It is a valuable teaching lesson.
I'm 6 days from the bar and I'm watching these videos as a replacement for therapy
Mike, I lack words to show my appreciation to your concise and simplified guide and methods but still, thank you for being a savior.
this man has rhythm, society has forgotten that rhythm IS time
I wish it was you in the barbri lectures :(
SAME! These videos are more helpful.
He is thorough
Every time I think about res ipsa, I think back to Torts 3 years ago and hear, "Burn versus BOWdull. Burn versus BOWdull." Try not saying it out loud lol. This guy is a lifesaver. Better than 90% of law professors
Why don't law schools talk about Mike and Studicata? I'm here in 2020 getting ready for Feb exam and this is LYFE!!! shot out to all the covid examinees!!!
Seconded. This is bar prep the way I need it to be.
I love theste... hes so chill and cool
Awesome summary. Super digestibl!
Appreciate this resource. The link for the 120 rules doesn’t work. I created an account and still don’t see the document.
Do you have a video where you talk about contract remedies? Having trouble locating it...
Do you think that these info sessions could be useful for someone taking the Florida Bar and not just the UBE?
Ian Salmon no
Amazing, thank you.
No problem, happy to help! 👍
Wouldnt $1 be enough for consideration. Peppercorn theory?
For some reason this doesn't sound right unless i play it at 1.25x speed.
Thanks for this!
@@Ruben-ry4hc good luck with everything bro!
Hi Michael, do you mention in your lectures that the acceptance must be communicated to the offeror or did I happen to miss that. You did mention many times that the offeror must communicate offer to the offeree.
Yes, the offeree must communicate his acceptance to the offeror.
However, under the mailbox rule, an *ACCEPTANCE* that is sent by mail, email, or fax is valid at the moment of dispatch (*NOT* when the letter is received), unless: the offeree-sender uses the wrong address or has improper postage (e.g., forgets to put a stamp on the envelope); the offeror stipulates that the acceptance is valid upon receipt; an option contract is involved; the offeree-sender sends a termination letter *BEFORE* the acceptance letter (e.g., a counteroffer or rejection letter); *OR* the offeror detrimentally relies on a termination *BEFORE* he receives the acceptance letter. If an exception applies, then the acceptance becomes effective at the moment the offeror receives the acceptance.
Thus, an acceptance _can_ become valid before the offeror receives the acceptance letter or otherwise has knowledge of the acceptance. This can create all kinds of interesting fact patterns.
More info: ua-cam.com/video/GQ0VfUU3U9s/v-deo.html
@@studicata Thanks Michael. What about when the offer is irrevocable? The Mailbox rule does not apply in that case too ryt?
Hey do you do PPR/
Thank youuuu
The link for the 120 Free Rules only goes to the home page where everything has a fee. Please send to me. Thank you.
Sorry about that! You can use this link: www.studicata.com/frequency
I love you so much. My old familiar friend ❤️
Mike? Lol. I wrote the fucking book on contracts, civ pro, constitutional law, real property, gifts, criminal law and criminal procedure, employment discrimination, civil rights litigation, federal courts, sorry trying to remember alk the classes I took and my grades in law school.
So Mike:
das ist sehr interessant
are you in a dancing club