Most Tested Bar Exam Rules: Evidence

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 бер 2018
  • FREE Top 120 Most-Tested Rule List: studicata.com/courses/studica...
    📚 LAW SCHOOL & BAR EXAM PREP
    Law school prep: studicata.com/law-school
    Bar exam prep: studicata.com/bar-exam
    Free courses: studicata.com/free-courses
    ❤️ COMMUNITY & REVIEWS
    Community: studicata.com/groups/community
    Testimonials: studicata.com/testimonials-an...
    Submit a review: shoutout.studicata.com
    📱 TECH
    iOS app: studicata.com/ios
    Android app: studicata.com/android
    📣 ABOUT
    Studicata provides a fresher, more relatable way to prep for law school finals and the bar exam. With top-rated video lectures, exam walkthrough videos, outlines, study guides, strategy guides, essay practice exams, multiple-choice assessments, performance tracking, and more-Studicata has you covered with everything you need to ace your finals and pass the bar exam with confidence.
    Email: info@studicata.com
    Learn more: studicata.com
    🎬 VIDEO INFO
    Most Tested Bar Exam Rules (MEE): Evidence
    (1) Relevance
    (2) Character Evidence
    (3) Hearsay
    Learn more: studicata.com

КОМЕНТАРІ • 35

  • @constanzaortiz92
    @constanzaortiz92 5 років тому +27

    Hi! This summary has been so fantastic! I've watched all your other evidence videos and they've been so helpful!! Totally cleared up my understanding. I wanted to follow-up and ask whether you've had a chance to make the flowchart for character evidence?

  • @jsamanipour7540
    @jsamanipour7540 4 роки тому +5

    Im willing to be an attorney in California as a foreign lawyer. The general principles of law is all same . Like jurisdictions, evidence rules , torts .... only the type of regulations are different. Im following your videos its very helpful to give me a vision on CA state Law

  • @hyojinlee
    @hyojinlee 3 роки тому

    Love all your videos, thank you so much!

  • @poppy5267
    @poppy5267 4 роки тому

    Very helpful thank you!

  • @christianthames2302
    @christianthames2302 Рік тому +1

    You have one of the best legal channels on the net man. You should pay someone to advertise you a little bit, you make it right back in advertising revenue and grow your channel

    • @studicata
      @studicata  Рік тому +1

      Thank you for your support!

  • @VK-el3of
    @VK-el3of 4 роки тому +4

    Omg. Taking February 2020 bar and love your videos. Seriously considering enrolling

  • @cleotoo1
    @cleotoo1 5 років тому +8

    thanks for the great video! could you include the flowchart you refer to?

    • @akiyahb4276
      @akiyahb4276 5 років тому

      I was just thinking the same!

  • @timothystarks5053
    @timothystarks5053 4 роки тому

    Great explanation of this rule I've heard thus far...great....it can get complicated but great job...

  • @reycfd7753
    @reycfd7753 2 роки тому +1

    Amazing! Thanks!

  • @johnshumate8112
    @johnshumate8112 Рік тому +1

    If I asked a witness on cross how they knew it was blue ink for the contract and they said, “because it was raining that day”, I would just say no further questions and sit down.

  • @Songtress777
    @Songtress777 4 роки тому

    Thank you!!

  • @legallycurvy
    @legallycurvy 5 років тому +9

    Nothing more attractive than a man who knows his evidence law. This explanation was brilliant. Very well done❤️❤️❤️

  • @tiggerish
    @tiggerish 5 років тому +3

    This is a great video and very clear.

  • @victoriakroger5506
    @victoriakroger5506 4 роки тому +7

    This is great! I do not see the link to an evidence tree chart as stated in the video. Did you ever make it?

  • @NamasteCC
    @NamasteCC 5 років тому +2

    thank you

  • @saradavies1582
    @saradavies1582 2 роки тому

    God bless the day i found studicata!!!!

  • @dagobello
    @dagobello 4 роки тому +1

    Awesome explanations.

  • @britnyhoag7404
    @britnyhoag7404 3 роки тому

    Can you post the link to the flow chart you mentioned you would in this video?

  • @hl7642
    @hl7642 3 роки тому +1

    Helpful

  • @rayysnhelll
    @rayysnhelll 4 роки тому

    How to bring the trust forward subrogation

  • @BitterComments
    @BitterComments 3 роки тому +1

    God bless you. And your tall hair!

  • @cass4420
    @cass4420 3 роки тому

    To clarify, you said for your mnemonic device “MIMIC” (sorry, I butchered the spelling of it, love the device nonetheless) - “preponderance of the evidence” to get some evidence in under FRE 404(b) Character Evidence; however, isn’t 404(b) for criminal cases only, therefore the standard of proof being beyond a reasonable doubt instead of preponderance? Why is it preponderance of the evidence for the weight of that evidence to get it admitted?

  • @ivancarlson953
    @ivancarlson953 4 роки тому

    In the Casey Antony trial, an expert witness, Dr. Rodriguez, failed to enter into his report that he couldn't make an opinion on where was the placement of the duct tape, despite the lawyer, Mr. Baez, previously had been given a court order to tell witnesses to enter all opinions into their reports. Rodriquez claimed he wasn't aware of that court order, and he wasn't conformable making the opinion since he had none. I guess this goes to show that evidence, even documentation that there is no opinion and the basis for that opinion, needs to be entered. The old adage, "if you didn't document it, you didn't do/consider it."

  • @saradavies1582
    @saradavies1582 2 роки тому

    i cannot find the tree please

  • @Yvesun2011
    @Yvesun2011 5 років тому +2

    Hello, Im preparing for the bar exam. What is your rate for coaching or do you have a program?

    • @studicata
      @studicata  5 років тому +1

      Hi there!
      You can find all our info at: www.studicata.com/
      Thank you!

  • @rukusfan1387
    @rukusfan1387 3 роки тому

    Give him a thumbs up!

  • @hl7642
    @hl7642 3 роки тому +1

    👍

  • @AntiMasonic93
    @AntiMasonic93 5 років тому +2

    Since this pertains to the California Bar, it would be nice to go over the California specific laws pertaining to evidence, such as prop. 8 and 352.

  • @shafiqrajuyan6606
    @shafiqrajuyan6606 Рік тому

    Is there any fullstop between your two Sentences? Please follow palki Sarma's presentation in gravitas.