Watch "Was Karen Read Framed?" on UA-cam ua-cam.com/video/gHVUtH6wXkY/v-deo.htmlsi=W-GOrrfRWD_4aM8Q In this video we take a closer look at the inverted video ...
When Bev paused and gave Lally a prompt "Would you like to object?" My jaw hit the floor! I have NEVER seen a judge do that (California in the house). States have different rules, but OMG!
Party me wants to know just how many times she intervened like that, and noted the number of time she gave him HINTS of how to object and with what reasoning, but man.. I cannot listen to Lally again.
I feel like Lally was stalling. He knows how to argue, and cross just fine when it comes down to it. I can't quite put my finger on why, but I think it had to do with the FBI's testimony. I don't think we're going to hear anywhere near as much about the high top table this time, or the snow that was falling, basketball games, and hockey leagues...
It's worse than misconduct, it's downright corruption. Yet,, we have a judge that actually enables his corruption. What's worse? I'd say BEV is. She gave zero fuks about a tampered video. Wtf? She really doesn't care what the cops do.
@@KarenColeUKLawyer in the Ashley Benefield trial was bad to the prosecutor change their theory mid trial, lied about who filed for divorce first, accused the defendant of things without evidence, and told the jury that she's trying to manipulate them, and the judge ruled exculpatory evidence as inadmissible. 😮😡
The judge allowed the prosecution to withhold evidence and never set deadlines. None of the evidence should’ve been admitted, period. The judge was a problem from the beginning and refused to rotate as scheduled just to keep this case
You don’t get on a whistleblowers list (leaked before even the pre trial hearing) of conflicted persons in CW v Read case with out good reason This court is third from the bottom on the right hand page (as you look at it not inverted) She is there for good reason as we have all seen with our own eyes
Not only that, but the chain of custody on ALL physical evidence wasn’t maintained. Sure they did once it got to the lab, but the way it was collected, held, and stored before it landed there was all kinds of wrong.
I am thinking of trying to find judges to compared, when similar things happen...like most judges with a jury on multiple charges, always ask before calling a mistrial will ask is there any charges you agree on. In this video I question that. Watch "Has The Karen Read Trial Ended?" on UA-cam ua-cam.com/video/l6oxiwez6Yw/v-deo.htmlsi=mPwKsR_Kb5hWZrp2
Inverted video was a "mistake"-- my butt! They know what their sally port looks like and what direction they drive into it!!! People have to be intentionally allowing themselves to be deceived to buy this. There needs to be charges for each person involved, and that may include the prosecutor if he knew this evidence was fraudulent.
They also EDITED the original time stamp out, flipped it, and then put in another one, but they fucked up on the colors. One was yellow, the other was blue. The font wasn’t even the same
This is just so gross. How in the world has the FBI not done anything about this yet. It makes me scared for innocent people and sick that it has gotten this far.
@CSC1steel It is hard to believe, and without worldwide attention, who would even have known about it... scary thought that there could be so many innocent defendants wrongly convicted with the way these officers investigate.
They will, it’s just a matter of who they are targeting. We’ve already seen them make an arrest in the birchmore case. I am like 75% sure SB and OJO are connected. He worked in s-crimes in Boston. Brian Albert worked in Boston. CPD Kevin Albert was the first officer on seen with SB. Lank, Tully, and Proctor worked on BOTH cases. OJO had reported over a DOZEN things to the CPD-why would he do that? Imo, he knew something no one wants exposed. I believe he made other similar calls to SPD. I’m starting to wonder if the CSA extended beyond Staughton. I don’t know anything about KB, but Lank… man that guy is a piece of work. He honestly gives me more disturbed vibes than Proctor. Tully is slimy, lank and Buckhenic had arrogant attitudes. proctor seemed to recognize he was in a world of hurt. A big part of me hopes I’m wrong, but I think what led to SBs abuse and death is far more extensive. I don’t think either of them STARTED the fbi investigation,but something led to one, then the other. I would not be surprised if there was more in the works.
The FBI told the prosecution that JOK was not hit by a car and they still proceeded. Defense expert witnessess were limited with what they could testify to but prosecution "experts" could say anything. The mirrored video that was introduced after the trial started and was not identified by the prosecution as being mirrored. Not stating reasons for objections could imply to the jury that the defense was continually doing something wrong. The prompts to Lally from the judge to object. The interruptions by the jidge during key moments of questioning. Giving the prosecution weeks to ask about the snow but only giving the defense days to present their case in chief. 1 hour closing statements. The sighs amd rudeness from the judge whenever the defense brought up valid things the judge or prosecution was getting wrong. I could go on for days......smh
I don’t know if you’ve looked into the Sandra Birchmore case, but she proves there is some very, very, VERY serious problem in Mass, specifically in Norfolk county. Kevin Albert, MP, Tully, Lank did her “investigation.” Guarino, the same guy who tried to tell us he saw nothing missing on the McAlberts phones and tried to convince us that OJO records stairs while in a car while on a road with barely any noticeable elevation. He “missed” some 30,000 texts between Farrell and SB, and with his other partners in crime for CSA. it also appears they got to the medical examiner in that case. There is ZERO way a medical examiner would have concluded self deletion with all the signs of assault and manual strangling on her, including a broken hyoid bone,
@rachelann9362 I started researching the Sarah Birchmore case. And just read of the arrest. I heard the trial will not be televised. I agree with what you are saying. Hopefully, this exposure warrants an overall clean-up for the sake of justice. 💕
Why is she not being challenged by a higher authority for her blatant wrong doings in a court of law on national TV 🤷♀️ surely there is a body that judges answer too? This is all hard to watch and hard to believe.. 🇮🇪🇮🇪
@judithquarrie47 it is odd, the interrupting she does. It appears as though she is discrediting the defense. I believe the Judge in the Parkland School Shooting ended up stepping down after similar complaints were made about her.
These prosecutors need to recall their duty is to present evidence for justice not convictions. Morrisey has an ego and Lally is a yes-sir man without integrity or the conviction to do what is right. I’m very concerned they did engage in prosecutorial misconduct yes.
Excellent video!!! Prosecutorial misconduct or prosecutorial overreach is "an illegal act or failing to act, on the part of a prosecutor, especially an attempt to sway the jury to wrongly convict a defendant or to impose a harsher than appropriate punishment... Types of misconduct are... *Failure to disclose exculpatory evidence *False confession *Falsified evidence *Malicious prosecution *Prosecutorial corruption *Retaliatory prosecution *Selective prosecution *Subornation of perjury I believe there's enough evidence to prove prosecutional misconduct by way of failure to disclose exculpatory evidence, falsified evidence and malicious prosecution... So, ABSOLUTELY there was prosecutional misconduct. Next video for you is Judge Bev's judicial misconduct... Which is when a judge acts in a way that violates their ethical obligations or is considered unethical. Then lets discuss how many boxes were ticked as per Aunt Bev and her charades... I'll list out some examples of judicial misconduct: *Improper treatment: Treating lawyers, witnesses, litigants, jurors, and court staff in a rude, abusive, or improper way *Failure to disqualify: Failing to disqualify when required by law *Misapplying the law. Wrongly including or excluding testimony and evidence during the trial. Failing to relay clear jury instructions properly *Ex parte communication: Receiving information about a case outside the presence of one party *Delay: Delaying decision-making *Bribes and favors: Accepting bribes, gifts, or other personal favors related to the judicial office *Partisan activity: Engaging in partisan political activity or making inappropriately partisan statements *Outside income: Violating rules or standards pertaining to restrictions on outside income *Sexual misconduct: Sexual misconduct *Discriminatory organizations: Joining discriminatory organizations *Using position: Using the judicial position to enhance a private interest Wow!!! Auntie Bev is guilty of judicial conduct quite a few times throughout this case now isn't she?? Improper treatment, Failure to disqualify and Misapplying the law to name a few.
@lynmarie1786 I think I better pin you comment. I want to watch the retrial hearings ( I haven't watched them). But the Microdot video was retrial wow Judge Bev was terrible, worse then during trial... if you can imagine. Shame.
The Prosecution stretched the law to its maximum. If anyone hasn't read about the pre-trial and grand jury sessions please do to get a full grasp on exactly what Lally was doing. Unfortunately the Judge helped. Serious misconduct? If this case is not under review it will be. Lally himself could easily be on trial. He has no idea of the trouble he will face. Struck off - or imprisonment.
Well written and informative- thank you What is the remedy? Seriously what can and should be done about a bench as lopsided as this one, at this point, obviously is
There certainly was prosecutorial misconduct but the more egregious violation was that of the judge. Judge Cannone was running interference for ADA Lally throughout the pre-trial motions and the trial itself. She allowed Lally to lead his witnesses but sustained the vast majority of his objections when Defense Attorney Jackson was impeaching many of Lally's witnesses, as their stories fell apart on the stand. Truth and Justice? I saw very little of those judicial goals in the trial proceedings; in fact, it was blatantly obvious that Judge Cannone had her hands on the scales of justice. She had no interest in conducting a fair trial, she did her best to hamstring the Defense in all her rulings and countless sidebars. As a result, the Jury missed a lot of background that would have been instrumental in fully understanding the case. Bottom line, the CW spectacularly failed to prove their case, especially when Trooper Paul's explanation of the event totally collapsed under the weight of cross examination. If Judge Cannone had been fair-minded and properly weighed the evidence presented by the CW, she would have issued a directed verdict once the CW rested their case. The CW failed to prove Karen Read's SUV made contact with Officer John O'Keefe, and as such, none of the charges against Ms. Read were valid.
@simmstac Did you see the FBI arrest regarding Sanadra Birchmore ? I believe some of the same police officers are involved in that investigation... as in the Karen Read.
Excellent work getting all of those clips together. I’m 100% convinced that Tully, Proctor, Canton’s Chief, and Bukhenik did shady things in this case. I’m glad you put the evidence together in a nice, concise way!
I'm a little surprised that during the trial it wasn't more heavily focused on that Higgins had access to that ring cam. In my opinion they went above and beyond to make sure that everyone knew that Higgins had access to the house. I feel like they were better ways to describe John and Higgins friendship. I feel like that was solely to make sure just in case anyone saw Higgins going into that house after John was dead and after Karen had been taken into mental health. The kids were gone, the house was empty. He had John's phone giving him access to the ring cam. So were to believe that Karen who did not have access to the phone as per testimony by the kids, was somehow able to hack into that system in about 15 minutes while she was somehow also gathering up her stuff, and alter that video exactly how it needed to be to be presented into evidence. We're supposed to believe all that craziness instead of the, realistic answer that Higgins did it. All because he's a cop and he just wouldn't do such a thing. Anyone else feeling a touch gaslit? I think Occam's razor applies here. What's the most obvious answer.? It's probably the right one. From red Solo cups to butt dials, to inverted, and missing video. To disappearing, and reappearing tail light pieces, to conflicting testimony. The FBI themselves testimony. Lally's stalling, Judge Bev's rulings, and inappropriate tone.. remember guys at the end where she chastised Karen Reed for thinking something was so funny yet at the beginning of the trial she told the jury that they couldn't do such a thing because of Karen's condition, she also told Jackson she would literally hear no more argument about the juries instructions, and how that played into how the trial ended. The confrontations that were going on in Canton at the time between turtle boy and the police department/ McCabe's, alleged misconduct with the jury... There is so much here that I'm absolutely certain that I have forgot stuff. This case absolutely stinks to high heaven and I hope with the video, that the appellate Court will be able to see that.
@JamieDoe472 Well written and thoughtful, plus don't forget there was an officer who saw the 3 of them leaving John O'Keefe's house...then it went missing. ( I cover that in the video with the thumbnail with cards on it Defence Doubling Down. ua-cam.com/video/Ml0PwwCDfqk/v-deo.htmlsi=T7AKu4evV7tZZ0pg
Thank you. I appreciate your feedback. I can not see sanctions for the court. Jurors need to be vidulent when deciding guilt and hold prosecutors to their burden. 💕
Lally's favourite word is objection. Proctor couldn't keep his lies straight and Bukhenik is just shady and Bev let's everything slide. This is still so cringeworthy watching this after knowing about all the texts he spewed out. FKR pronto!
There was a lot of video footage that was tampered with or deleted that the prosecution should have known about. I have seen that the prosecution delayed handing over evidence for almost a year and a half. And that to this day there are other items the defense asked for that were never turned over.
I watch a lot of court. This makes my head want to explode. AJ has sooo much patience. Great vid, thank you so much! If this were fiction it would be unbelievable...
There was prosecutorial and judicial misconduct. If anyone has seen the new microdots upload, there was misconduct going on in pre trial. Even though Jackson more than proved Auntie bev has ties to people in the case, and should be legal right to recused herself, she went back to her chamber (to think it over) and had a melt down and came back out of breath and visually shaking. Her hands were shaking so bad, you could see the gasses she was holding vibrate. Then she said NO. There was evidence that was supposed to be being tested and lally kept stalling about giving defence a copy, and kept telling them in a few weeks. Jackson then showed communication from the lab that said, they had attempted to reach Lally several times and were ignored, so they closed the file on the testing. I have no idea what was being tested, but it was destroyed. The Defence really needs to get this case in a higher court regarding the many issues of misconduct. What they did in Karens trial, was 100 times worse that Baldwin.
This is a disgrace,this judge should be held responsible for all of this wrong doing,how would she feel if one of her loved ones was in this position and god forbid Karen does prison time for this
The fact that no photos were taken when the car was seized, I believe all evidence collected after that should be disallowed due to chain of custody issues. The whole case is disgusting.
@robertscown9218 And why bring the SUV back to Canton ( oh because they only recused themselves for questioning... yah, right?....it was so wrong it upset me as well
The appearance of bias and corruption is real and judge Bev should never have been on the bench. Whether she knows Sean McCabe or not is irrelevant when the public perceives her action's as biased. She should have recused herself.
So much misconduct I can't even process. The way this judge rushes the defense is unlike anything I've ever witnessed in any trial I've ever watched. This judge is complicit. She's absolutely awful.
There was all kinds of prosecutorial misconduct going all the way back to the very initial pre trial hearings. The judge just ignored it all and allowed the prosecutors to "correct their errors".
Question: During the hearing to recuse Judge Bev, the defense came with some pretty solid evidence showing that Beverly has ties to the very witnesses that the defense implicates in their 3rd party culprit defense. All that is needed is the _appearance_ of bias, but regardless, Bev argued the veracity of the evidence presented against her when denying the recusal. Is she allowed to do that? Judge Glanville (YSL trial in GA) got reprimanded by the GA Supreme Court for arguing against his bias, when they granted the defense request to recuse him. The GA Supreme Court said the judge was not allowed to argue whether the facts were true or not, but rather that when the 3 prongs for recusal were met, he was to stand down and hand it over to a new judge. Does this not apply in MA as well? I hope the defense can get Bev booted off the retrial, if there is one. The public appearance of her bias is crystal clear.
The Pretrial Hearings, and there were many, were infuriating. The DAs public statement is a misconduct gem in and of itself. If you want to watch them Atty Melanie Little has all of them in her playlist. It's a calm, smart channel.
Yes, I saw Melanie's interview with a police dog trainer very good...and her commitment for Karen Read Trial is commendable. She made her first an appearance on police off the cuff. I think they met in acting classes. I believe she is a full time UA-camr... and has got a great following.
yes, when the FBI/DOJ independently tell both parties that Read didn't hit him with her car, and JOK was NOT hit by a car, the district attorney needed to drop the charges immediately.
You would think...but I heard jury thought the FBI hiring the accident reconstruction experts... the jury thought they might have been Karen Read's insurance company...*all because judge would not allow the jury to know who hired them...(hope that makes sense).
@@KarenColeUKLawyer yes, I saw that too, which makes it just more of a travesty that Beach house Bev blocked the truth, I knew the jury couldn't figure out that the Feds had hired them!!!
the whole thing has been dodgy from day one... Aunty Bev seems to have an agenda ... to pin it on the girl.. got to wonder why she is hanging on so tight to the case... exactly what dirt does who have on her?
The prosecution’s entire case had major moments of prosecutorial misconduct…the inverted video being the most glaring…beyond that the prosecution’s case alone should have left every honest soul out there with reasonable doubt as to Karen Read’s guilt on all counts. In fact I would argue it should be unreasonable to not have reasonable doubt. If the defense had rested then they should have easily gotten not guilty verdicts. And yet even after they presented their side which poked even more holes in the prosecution’s case-like gaping holes…they only got a mistrial. What trial were the O’Keefe’s watching? And to the hung jury on the one count I can’t even see where they were coming from at all.
@@anonymousowl72 Well said and written. If i voted not guilty on 2 counts, I would want to sue the court for picking the foreman who clearly had not done his job in reporting my vote...and wasted 9-1/2 weeks of my life. lol... honestly the more I think about it I feel sick this is what justice looks like.
@@KarenColeUKLawyer thank you and agree, it’s sickening and what a waste of time…especially in light of Auntie Bev coddling them knowing potentially she could manipulate their decisions.
@timquitzau1510 Ahh thanks. I value every subscriber, and my aim is that you find some value, take away, and you are inspired to comment. I heard a judge say the other day, our justice system, should be scrutinised and held to the highest standard. My aim is not to humiliate but to understand and see where it goes wrong. And commend those involved in the process, when it goes right.
It was definitely in my opinion prosecutorial misconduct. They knew good and well that video had been flipped, and they tried to present it as if though they were standing by the passenger side of the vehicle. But did the judge do anything not at all. Why would she? She’s too busy trying to cover for them. They all need to be held accountable, the judge and the prosecution along with the police officers. Hopefully the FBI will finally do some real investigation and hold all those accountable and then maybe the truth can come out for what really happened to John. We know Karen did not hit him with the car, all the evidence proves that she did not do it
Protecting serving police officers, the body was found in snow outside and yet the troopers did not get a search warrant for the home, based on one person saying Karen admitted that she hit the victim information that the witness failed to divulge on the day and hours after the body was found, therefore the evidence was made to fit the story.
💯 I did a video on the idea there was no probable cause... what if the occupants of the house were injured...why didn't the dog bark? So many questions.
The whole trial is very frustrating. Every time i rewatch testimonies i cannot understand why someone in power has not stepped in yet. My lord a blind man could see the corruption.im still amazed at the jury not just calling it NG on all counts .
I am with you ... great observation. I heard the jury thought the defense accident reconstruction experts were her car insurance. * remember the court would not allow in if was the FBI that hired them...and the defense, just asked we haven't hired you...or paid for you...
On cross examination, they are allowed to lead witnesses. So when Lally objects when AJ says things like "you clearly...", and Bev says "ask it differently"--- based on what?? The only thing I can think of is leading. I still wish they had said what the objections were. Most of them had to be BS. And the way Bev handled them and inserted herself was inappropriate. Also, 100% there was prosecutorial misconduct. In SO many ways.
@Raymail-tj4cf they kept saying the other hearing. And judge would not allow defense to say the accident reconstruction experts were hired by the FBI. (So jurors, from what ... I heard assumed they were from her car insurance because the defense did say something about them not hired by defense.) Unbelievable
There were actually two separate federal grand Juries. One Levy let them lie under oath at. The next he confronted them with their electronic records. It's where the butt dial excuse came from. They couldn't admit to making those phone calls and texts after swearing they never did. Because if they admitted it they'd be admitting to lying under oath previously. Higgins also gave a proffer at some point. Nobody knows exactly what he said but it's likely how the defense knew how he disposed of his phone. Another really crazy thing that came out at trial from multiple witnesses. Lally coaching them before they testified in front of the federal grand juries.
@@KarenColeUKLawyer he really is. I can’t wait for this whole trial to be over with so we can hear what he and David Yannetti have to say. If it is maddening for us, I can’t imagine how it is for them.
I take WO to mean "without" prejudice. The state's cause revolved around the tail light and the video clips we saw provided by this presenter, showed the vehicle's tail light lens intact. Read had said she backed into O'Keefe's vehicle in the course of moving her vehicle to begin to look for O'Keefe. Hitting O'Keefe's car punched a hole in the red lens of the tail light of her vehicle. The TL lens was clearly not shattered into all the pieces the Trooper and Lally are claiming it was. Then add all the other "inexplicable" things from the magic Sally Port video to the casual continuing to find pieces of lens for weeks after O'Keefes murder. Other writers have made, to their credit, provided what amount to "laundry lists" of irregularities or assertions that seemingly negate themselves when subjected to any critical scrutiny. This prosecution should have been dismissed "with prejudice". I can understand why some people on the jury would want to believe the police, even in this case. Other podcaster's with legal experience, pointed out the the defense should have limited itself We as citizens do rely on police, for some small things, as well as events that are a crisis. I have been a minor beneficiary of police action myself. A vehicle I was driving was hit by someone running a red light, long after the traffic light had gone green in my vehicle's direction of travel. The red light runner was obscured by tall, concrete elevated commuter train supports and a large truck, waiting in a right hand only, turn lane. The red light runner had a van full of relatives and he stopped. I called the local police, who at least at that time, in that city, took fender bender reports. (I thought for a couple of seconds, I was dead meat. I was a heartbeat or two short of successfully taking evasive action, but I avoided being T-Boned in my cars driver's door.) The van driver later claimed I ran the red light, not him. He had witnesses. I had a police report that he had signed. Police officers can also make innocent mistakes. I testified as an expert witness in a car crash that involved some friends. My friend was ticketed for failing to properly control her vehicle, resulting in a car crash. The vehicle had a failure of a lower ball joint, which is a critical suspension component*. This failure caused the car to swerve into oncoming traffic. The police officer thought that my friend had negligently lossed control of her vehicle. After listening to her explanation and looking at the vehicle, it was obvious what had caused her loss of control. When the left lower front ball joint failed, it caused the steering linkage to pull the car into a sharp left turn and into oncoming traffic. The kicker to this part's failure, it was a brand new part. My friend was still responsible for the damage to the other vehicle, however, due to the facts of this incident, it was not correct to be ticketed for failing to properly operate her vehicle. *for people who know what a ball joint is: The "ball" of the ball joint pulled out the socket of the ball joint. This was a used car that had just been purchased and had had front end work, before it was sold. There was no visible wear on the "ball".
This is the most UNJUSTIFIED CASE THAT IVE EVER SEEn ,READ, OR HEARD IN MY ENTIRE LIFE. This so called judge should certainly be disbarred from her position as sho😮uld whomever was involved with this case including the DA. How can they continue to hold their positions with all of the wrong was done from the very beginning of this case? 1. They never put crime tape to protect the property from being contaminated 2. All of the people within the property (inside and outside) of the crime scene were never questioned 3. Why they didn't use sanitary products to gather evidence 4. Why were the Canton police department even involved in any part of the investigation 5. Why Trooper Proctor was involved in any matter at all knowing that he had a close relationship with the parties involved 6. ALL OF The state POLICE involved help with cover up instead of doing g their job to investigate the murder of another police officer 7. Why would every officer protect the home owner who is another police officer?
According to Proctor..it was Rafferty who passed over the inverted video...😮 Man they need to come in and clean house!! Tully and Bukaneke..such a joke, all of them
@lynettemacvicar1034 Oh wow I could have met you for coffee...England is beautiful. However when I came here I couldn't believe how the roads are smaller... I did a video on driving in a foreign country ( and I show some on lanes near me). Also did a video taking you on a drive through lanes, going to a iconic Abbey. ua-cam.com/video/vFGNYR1433Q/v-deo.htmlsi=uixAJHnF4E3TD2P3 that might bring back some memories of England for you. 💕
Disgusting how the judge helped the prosecutor by sustaining most of his BS objections that had No justified reason. Extremely Biased judge who helped the prosecutor!
Far more judicial misconduct honestly. Prosecutorial misconduct can be dealt with if there's a good defense team and a competent judge. This judge was rabidly pro prosecution to the point it's blatantly obvious she was covering for them
Also, when the vehicle is pulled into the Sally port, for supposedly the first time, the floor of the area it is pulling into is completely clear of snow in exactly the same size and shape of her vehicle. In other words, it was probably already in the Sally port prior to this, then it was made to look like it was pulled in for the first time here, but it was not. What may have happened during that period? Thank you for time and effort to exposing the prosecutorial misconduct in the case amidst so much other misconduct.
The ring camera from her leaving the house shows the tail light was intact and the pieces the accumulated in 5 days didn’t match her tail light! You don’t have to be an investigator to figure this one out
Where is the Defense MISCONDUCT charge? The Defense made a CLAIM at the beginning of the trial that some other individual committed the crime, but provided NO evidence that ANYONE other than Karen Read committed the crime. The Federal prosecutor also needs to explain TO THE PUBLIC how the federal investigation was started and why after a lot of money was spent (Some say over a million dollars) there are no federal charges. How do we know the federal investigation is over? The federal government NEVER would have turned over the 3,000 page report which lays out the investigation if the grand jury was still in session. The grand jury has to issue indictments before ending. There have been no arrests by the feds, so there were no indictments. Why couldn't the federal investigation be mentioned in court? It would have been TOO PREJUDICIAL AGAINST Karen Read. The Feds investigated many people that were not Karen Read for the crime and found NO evidence that someone else did it. The Defense was VERY CLEVER in their lies and relying on the ignorance of the general public who get their knowledge of the law from watching TV to create a conspiracy where none existed.
@nelsona8285 The Feds just arrested Officer Matthew Farewell, for the M of Sandra Birchmore. Do not sure what you mean the grand jury is not in session. 💕
@@KarenColeUKLawyer There is not just ONE federal grand jury in a federal district at any given time. There can be MULTIPLE grand juries for different investigations. The Sandra Birchmore grand jury is definitely NOT the same grand jury that heard evidence in the Karen Read case. The US Attorney's Office would NEVER release that 3,000 page report to the judge, prosecutor and defense in the Karen Read case if it was still in session. Grand Juries are SECRET proceedings and that 3,000 page report gave up the whole investigation. It also showed that many people were questioned and no one else was charged in the federal investigation. That is why the federal investigation could not be mentioned in Read's trial. It would be too prejudicial against Read. She did it. At least 8 jurors didn't believe the "corrupt cops did it as well as framed me for doing it" story that she told after about 5 other stories she told at different times before the trial started.
@nelsona8285 Thanks for that. However, whilst I understand the FBI report could be considered prejudicial for the Prosecution. The jurors thought the accident reconstruction experts were hired by her car insurance company. So, in a retrail they should say they are not hired or represent her car insurance. I am sure Karen Read was confused pretrial, with all the negative accusations. Do you really think given the terrible investigation and Sallyport video, missing time etc it is not possible the taillight pieces were planted? So do you also not believe Sargent Borrows, taillight was cracked but not completely missing?💕
@@KarenColeUKLawyer I think many guilty people have won in court by having high priced, sleazy attorneys. I think there is a special place in hell for sleazy attorneys that KNOW THAT THEIR CLIENT IS GUILTY and try to blame others for the crime their client committed. This was a simple DUI hit and run case. John O'Keefe's cell phone data reported NO new GPS positions shortly after Read left him, it was found UNDER his body and continued recording GPS positions when the police took his phone. You think she was "confused" when she gave the TV interview where she said she may have hit him and in his drunkenness he passed out? That is still causing his demise. How about her phone call to Kerry Roberts at 5am, before he was found, saying he was dead and possibly a plow hit him? What was the call at 1 am to her parents about? Why didn't the Defense put her father and brother on the stand to refute the "The taillight was not as damaged as the sallyport photo shows" defense? They both saw her SUV that morning. Her brother was on video cleaning snow off her SUV. If you listen to the actual testimony of the sergeant it was cracked and packed with snow. The dashcam photo (Exhibit 103) at 8 am in O'Keefe's driveway (before her SUV was found and seized by state police) clearly shows A LOT more missing red lens compared to the driver side tail light. Not cracked as the defense claimed happened when she backed into John's vehicle which even the ARCAA guys said would not have cracked the tail light.
@@KarenColeUKLawyer Exhibit 103 which is a photo from dashcam video taken at 8am in the driveway of John O'Keefe's home shows Read's SUV and the passenger tail light clearly has A LOT less red lens than the driver's tail light. This was BEFORE the state troopers seized her SUV at her parents home. If you watch the court testimony of the sergeant he said the lens was cracked and packed with snow. So, now please tell me how John's cellphone data that showed the phone NEVER going in the house and stopping updates shortly after Read left until it was found under John's body in the morning was wrong or somehow altered by State police detectives?
Great insight into this mess of a trial.thank you for shining a light or the misscarrage of justice.karen read is factually innocent.shame on the state for even trying this farce un open court.I look forward to your next post!
@@KarenColeUKLawyer i have been watching your content and am very impressed by theway you deliver the way the cases covered with thought and quite sound reasoning.the nuances of trial law are fascinating to me.once again,thanks for shedding some light on these matters.look forward to seeing your next post.
Appreciate your reply. I will be watching the Donna Adelson Trial coming up next week. I have a playlist on that case, very interesting. Watch "Conspiracy To Commit Murder of Dan Markel | Florida State Prosecutions" on UA-cam ua-cam.com/play/PLM8XvRAYm0JW26aCjADtGKpW1A_6UGknB.html&si=hkblPLoTqF8zM8eD
Proctors uneven and seemingly “manual” (as in…not automatic) breathing pattern seriously gives me anxiety. It’s like, he suddenly realizes his brain needs oxygen and he takes a big huge rip of fresh air, just in time. I’m assuming he’s just under an immense amount of stress and dpressure, so his body isn’t working exactly right, but man…if that’s just how he breathes regularly, 😬 is he ok?
I don’t understand why defense didn’t bring up that the roads where icy and the 23 mph was her tires spinning and when it jerked is when she hit a dry spot on the road
From what I remember...the defense proved with the SUV ignition start cycles (that LE used the wrong key cycles ..)..and that the reverse actually happened after they collected Karen Reads Car.
I think Lally covered a few backs what Lally did here is very naughty. Did you see the video I did on Can you spot a lie? ua-cam.com/video/dnoYBWq1RDo/v-deo.htmlsi=jqPI68MPND7XIRMz
In pretrial hearings, Lally said that the time on the video that showed when the defendant's car was towed from the home was wrong because of daylight savings time. So they knew before trial started. How can they claim it was a "typo" here?
@mrsloveleebest Oh yes Snap ...it was and is... painful to watch... like when she in front of the jury rushes the defense to move along...when the prosecutor should object if they think questions are repetitive...( I hope that makes sense)...
@@KarenColeUKLawyer ‘ I’ll allow that’ or ‘ I’ll give you that one Mr Lally 🤯🤯🤯 we have the reasonable man standard to uphold as jurors & it seems Judge Canone is unable to attain or maintain the reasonable man standard herself. She’s supposed to be the gate keeper, the overseer of justice and she is shameless in her application of the law imo.
@mrsloveleebest I agree...I just read the judges decision on a very famous case in uk in response to an appeal ( and it is contempt of court to share or mention it without expessed permission from the court. We are so lucky to be able to discuss and see trials in USA.
Every single element of prosecutorial misconduct in present imo. It’s tragic that this can happen in (I wanna say 2024 lol) 2025. Makes me sick tbh. Excellent video Karen ❤
Has microdots put the video of the Sally port Lally presented to the other troopers in the frame while proctor is talking about what video HE viewed in the interior for pre-trial prep? the colors he quoted for the date and timestamps were COMPLETELY different. He described yellow, they inverted video was blue. 15:15 never mind, you got to it. That was SUCH a major sticking point for me. It was glaringly obvious when I first heard his testimony. I was PISSED. The video wasn’t just inverted, it was EDITED. I don’t know who did it, whether it was the Ada office, or the police, but either way it falsified evidence. It should have been an instant mistrial.
![Jodi Arias Testifies [PT 7] | Court TV Trial Archive](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/DqKAsK5wUNg/mqdefault.jpg)
Watch "Was Karen Read Framed?" on UA-cam ua-cam.com/video/gHVUtH6wXkY/v-deo.htmlsi=W-GOrrfRWD_4aM8Q
In this video we take a closer look at the inverted video ...
This case should have been dismissed as soon as the sally port video was played. Definitely prosecutorial misconduct
The case should have been dismissed as soon as the red solo cups came in
When Bev paused and gave Lally a prompt "Would you like to object?" My jaw hit the floor! I have NEVER seen a judge do that (California in the house). States have different rules, but OMG!
@camillemayers103 the judge appeared to insert herself for the CW that was apparent to me as well.
She did that so many times!
Party me wants to know just how many times she intervened like that, and noted the number of time she gave him HINTS of how to object and with what reasoning, but man.. I cannot listen to Lally again.
@@rachelann9362 I listened to Lally at 1.5 speed. lol
I feel like Lally was stalling. He knows how to argue, and cross just fine when it comes down to it. I can't quite put my finger on why, but I think it had to do with the FBI's testimony. I don't think we're going to hear anywhere near as much about the high top table this time, or the snow that was falling, basketball games, and hockey leagues...
It's worse than misconduct, it's downright corruption. Yet,, we have a judge that actually enables his corruption. What's worse? I'd say BEV is. She gave zero fuks about a tampered video. Wtf? She really doesn't care what the cops do.
💯
I've never seen anything like this! And I hope none of us ever do again.
@marysupernova7780 💯 % this is not the way our justice system should be.
@@KarenColeUKLawyer in the Ashley Benefield trial was bad to the prosecutor change their theory mid trial, lied about who filed for divorce first, accused the defendant of things without evidence, and told the jury that she's trying to manipulate them, and the judge ruled exculpatory evidence as inadmissible. 😮😡
@tyreseforren6721 Oh I had something to say about Ashley Benefield's trial in a video. You are 💯 correct.
The whole thing was misconduct of judicial services on state side. Absolutely disgusting
The judge allowed the prosecution to withhold evidence and never set deadlines. None of the evidence should’ve been admitted, period. The judge was a problem from the beginning and refused to rotate as scheduled just to keep this case
@SueMarie-tg7xu 💯 accurate the Microdots video is very good at highlighting what you mention. 💕
You don’t get on a whistleblowers list (leaked before even the pre trial hearing) of conflicted persons in CW v Read case with out good reason
This court is third from the bottom on the right hand page (as you look at it not inverted)
She is there for good reason as we have all seen with our own eyes
Not only that, but the chain of custody on ALL physical evidence wasn’t maintained. Sure they did once it got to the lab, but the way it was collected, held, and stored before it landed there was all kinds of wrong.
Why are these people still working ?
@bridgetmoriarty7243 good question 🤔
I don't understand why the judge was permitted to be so clearly biased. What on earth is going on with US justice of late?
I am thinking of trying to find judges to compared, when similar things happen...like most judges with a jury on multiple charges, always ask before calling a mistrial will ask is there any charges you agree on. In this video I question that. Watch "Has The Karen Read Trial Ended?" on UA-cam ua-cam.com/video/l6oxiwez6Yw/v-deo.htmlsi=mPwKsR_Kb5hWZrp2
Inverted video was a "mistake"-- my butt! They know what their sally port looks like and what direction they drive into it!!! People have to be intentionally allowing themselves to be deceived to buy this. There needs to be charges for each person involved, and that may include the prosecutor if he knew this evidence was fraudulent.
They also EDITED the original time stamp out, flipped it, and then put in another one, but they fucked up on the colors. One was yellow, the other was blue. The font wasn’t even the same
This is just so gross. How in the world has the FBI not done anything about this yet. It makes me scared for innocent people and sick that it has gotten this far.
@CSC1steel It is hard to believe, and without worldwide attention, who would even have known about it... scary thought that there could be so many innocent defendants wrongly convicted with the way these officers investigate.
They will, it’s just a matter of who they are targeting. We’ve already seen them make an arrest in the birchmore case. I am like 75% sure SB and OJO are connected. He worked in s-crimes in Boston. Brian Albert worked in Boston. CPD Kevin Albert was the first officer on seen with SB. Lank, Tully, and Proctor worked on BOTH cases. OJO had reported over a DOZEN things to the CPD-why would he do that? Imo, he knew something no one wants exposed. I believe he made other similar calls to SPD. I’m starting to wonder if the CSA extended beyond Staughton. I don’t know anything about KB, but Lank… man that guy is a piece of work. He honestly gives me more disturbed vibes than Proctor. Tully is slimy, lank and Buckhenic had arrogant attitudes. proctor seemed to recognize he was in a world of hurt. A big part of me hopes I’m wrong, but I think what led to SBs abuse and death is far more extensive.
I don’t think either of them STARTED the fbi investigation,but something led to one, then the other. I would not be surprised if there was more in the works.
I am also wondering...Kevin Albert investigated Birchmore... hmmm maybe there's more of a connection 🤔
The FBI told the prosecution that JOK was not hit by a car and they still proceeded. Defense expert witnessess were limited with what they could testify to but prosecution "experts" could say anything. The mirrored video that was introduced after the trial started and was not identified by the prosecution as being mirrored. Not stating reasons for objections could imply to the jury that the defense was continually doing something wrong. The prompts to Lally from the judge to object. The interruptions by the jidge during key moments of questioning. Giving the prosecution weeks to ask about the snow but only giving the defense days to present their case in chief. 1 hour closing statements. The sighs amd rudeness from the judge whenever the defense brought up valid things the judge or prosecution was getting wrong. I could go on for days......smh
Her bias is so blatantly obvious, yet she continues to get away with it. Higher ups are protecting her. Makes me sick
@islesofshoals3551 Scary thought 😳 that higher ups are protecting her.
@dariansoennichsen5751 Well said, and very articulate. I agree 💯
I don’t know if you’ve looked into the Sandra Birchmore case, but she proves there is some very, very, VERY serious problem in Mass, specifically in Norfolk county. Kevin Albert, MP, Tully, Lank did her “investigation.” Guarino, the same guy who tried to tell us he saw nothing missing on the McAlberts phones and tried to convince us that OJO records stairs while in a car while on a road with barely any noticeable elevation. He “missed” some 30,000 texts between Farrell and SB, and with his other partners in crime for CSA. it also appears they got to the medical examiner in that case. There is ZERO way a medical examiner would have concluded self deletion with all the signs of assault and manual strangling on her, including a broken hyoid bone,
@rachelann9362 I started researching the Sarah Birchmore case. And just read of the arrest. I heard the trial will not be televised. I agree with what you are saying. Hopefully, this exposure warrants an overall clean-up for the sake of justice. 💕
Well done video. Canone's corruption is shameless.
Why is she not being challenged by a higher authority for her blatant wrong doings in a court of law on national TV 🤷♀️ surely there is a body that judges answer too? This is all hard to watch and hard to believe.. 🇮🇪🇮🇪
@@wtfmass I feel the same.
Judges only answer to alleged misconduct is on an appeal and appeal courts are reluctant to admonish judges
@davidreece5867 thanks for answering me ... that's crazy it's like they have no fear then and can as they please. !!
In the Alec Baldwin’s case trial judge reacted to the prosecutors misconduct, and a the case was dismissed without prejudice.
See my response below
Does a bear poop in the woods? Of course there was misconduct!!!😂
@@sandydunes6998 💯
Iv never seen a judge be so involved in a trial. Its so irritating to watch her! The sighs are the worst..unbelievable!!
@judithquarrie47 it is odd, the interrupting she does. It appears as though she is discrediting the defense. I believe the Judge in the Parkland School Shooting ended up stepping down after similar complaints were made about her.
Prosecutorial misconduct in a very deceitful manner
@@caroldepta 💯
These prosecutors need to recall their duty is to present evidence for justice not convictions. Morrisey has an ego and Lally is a yes-sir man without integrity or the conviction to do what is right. I’m very concerned they did engage in prosecutorial misconduct yes.
She didn’t dismiss the case cause in my opinion she ..is auntie Bev!
@@filio739 True...
Con flict of interest?
Excellent video!!!
Prosecutorial misconduct or prosecutorial overreach is "an illegal act or failing to act, on the part of a prosecutor, especially an attempt to sway the jury to wrongly convict a defendant or to impose a harsher than appropriate punishment...
Types of misconduct are...
*Failure to disclose exculpatory evidence
*False confession
*Falsified evidence
*Malicious prosecution
*Prosecutorial corruption
*Retaliatory prosecution
*Selective prosecution
*Subornation of perjury
I believe there's enough evidence to prove prosecutional misconduct by way of failure to disclose exculpatory evidence, falsified evidence and malicious prosecution... So, ABSOLUTELY there was prosecutional misconduct.
Next video for you is Judge Bev's judicial misconduct... Which is when a judge acts in a way that violates their ethical obligations or is considered unethical.
Then lets discuss how many boxes were ticked as per Aunt Bev and her charades...
I'll list out some examples of judicial misconduct:
*Improper treatment: Treating lawyers, witnesses, litigants, jurors, and court staff in a rude, abusive, or improper way
*Failure to disqualify: Failing to disqualify when required by law
*Misapplying the law. Wrongly including or excluding testimony and evidence during the trial. Failing to relay clear jury instructions properly
*Ex parte communication: Receiving information about a case outside the presence of one party
*Delay: Delaying decision-making
*Bribes and favors: Accepting bribes, gifts, or other personal favors related to the judicial office
*Partisan activity: Engaging in partisan political activity or making inappropriately partisan statements
*Outside income: Violating rules or standards pertaining to restrictions on outside income
*Sexual misconduct: Sexual misconduct
*Discriminatory organizations: Joining discriminatory organizations
*Using position: Using the judicial position to enhance a private interest
Wow!!! Auntie Bev is guilty of judicial conduct quite a few times throughout this case now isn't she?? Improper treatment, Failure to disqualify and Misapplying the law to name a few.
@lynmarie1786 I think I better pin you comment. I want to watch the retrial hearings ( I haven't watched them). But the Microdot video was retrial wow Judge Bev was terrible, worse then during trial... if you can imagine. Shame.
Excellent breakdown of Judge Beverages actions/behaviors
Clearly, you do not have a J.D.
Judge Canone has done NOTHING you've listed.
The Prosecution stretched the law to its maximum. If anyone hasn't read about the pre-trial and grand jury sessions please do to get a full grasp on exactly what Lally was doing. Unfortunately the Judge helped. Serious misconduct? If this case is not under review it will be.
Lally himself could easily be on trial.
He has no idea of the trouble he will face. Struck off - or imprisonment.
Well written and informative- thank you
What is the remedy?
Seriously what can and should be done about a bench as lopsided as this one, at this point, obviously is
There certainly was prosecutorial misconduct but the more egregious violation was that of the judge. Judge Cannone was running interference for ADA Lally throughout the pre-trial motions and the trial itself. She allowed Lally to lead his witnesses but sustained the vast majority of his objections when Defense Attorney Jackson was impeaching many of Lally's witnesses, as their stories fell apart on the stand. Truth and Justice? I saw very little of those judicial goals in the trial proceedings; in fact, it was blatantly obvious that Judge Cannone had her hands on the scales of justice. She had no interest in conducting a fair trial, she did her best to hamstring the Defense in all her rulings and countless sidebars. As a result, the Jury missed a lot of background that would have been instrumental in fully understanding the case.
Bottom line, the CW spectacularly failed to prove their case, especially when Trooper Paul's explanation of the event totally collapsed under the weight of cross examination. If Judge Cannone had been fair-minded and properly weighed the evidence presented by the CW, she would have issued a directed verdict once the CW rested their case. The CW failed to prove Karen Read's SUV made contact with Officer John O'Keefe, and as such, none of the charges against Ms. Read were valid.
@dji9424 Well said. And you have a keen eye for interpreting what took place during the trial. I agree 💯.
There was all kinds of misconduct. Here comes the FBI!
Like they will help omg
@simmstac Did you see the FBI arrest regarding Sanadra Birchmore ? I believe some of the same police officers are involved in that investigation... as in the Karen Read.
Excellent work getting all of those clips together. I’m 100% convinced that Tully, Proctor, Canton’s Chief, and Bukhenik did shady things in this case. I’m glad you put the evidence together in a nice, concise way!
@cstrueb1 Ahh thanks it was a bit of a challenge. The Prosecutor was all over the place. I appreciate your feedback.
I'm a little surprised that during the trial it wasn't more heavily focused on that Higgins had access to that ring cam. In my opinion they went above and beyond to make sure that everyone knew that Higgins had access to the house. I feel like they were better ways to describe John and Higgins friendship. I feel like that was solely to make sure just in case anyone saw Higgins going into that house after John was dead and after Karen had been taken into mental health. The kids were gone, the house was empty. He had John's phone giving him access to the ring cam. So were to believe that Karen who did not have access to the phone as per testimony by the kids, was somehow able to hack into that system in about 15 minutes while she was somehow also gathering up her stuff, and alter that video exactly how it needed to be to be presented into evidence. We're supposed to believe all that craziness instead of the, realistic answer that Higgins did it. All because he's a cop and he just wouldn't do such a thing. Anyone else feeling a touch gaslit? I think Occam's razor applies here. What's the most obvious answer.? It's probably the right one. From red Solo cups to butt dials, to inverted, and missing video. To disappearing, and reappearing tail light pieces, to conflicting testimony. The FBI themselves testimony. Lally's stalling, Judge Bev's rulings, and inappropriate tone.. remember guys at the end where she chastised Karen Reed for thinking something was so funny yet at the beginning of the trial she told the jury that they couldn't do such a thing because of Karen's condition, she also told Jackson she would literally hear no more argument about the juries instructions, and how that played into how the trial ended. The confrontations that were going on in Canton at the time between turtle boy and the police department/ McCabe's, alleged misconduct with the jury... There is so much here that I'm absolutely certain that I have forgot stuff. This case absolutely stinks to high heaven and I hope with the video, that the appellate Court will be able to see that.
@JamieDoe472 Well written and thoughtful, plus don't forget there was an officer who saw the 3 of them leaving John O'Keefe's house...then it went missing. ( I cover that in the video with the thumbnail with cards on it Defence Doubling Down. ua-cam.com/video/Ml0PwwCDfqk/v-deo.htmlsi=T7AKu4evV7tZZ0pg
@@KarenColeUKLawyer I never saw it. I'll have to check it out when I have time. Thanks!
@JamieDoe472 You are welcome and keep the great comments coming...very helpful 💕
Great show and spot on everything you said. Corrupt Judge and Prosecutor.
Jail time.... !!!
Thank you. I appreciate your feedback. I can not see sanctions for the court. Jurors need to be vidulent when deciding guilt and hold prosecutors to their burden. 💕
Lally's favourite word is objection. Proctor couldn't keep his lies straight and Bukhenik is just shady and Bev let's everything slide. This is still so cringeworthy watching this after knowing about all the texts he spewed out. FKR pronto!
@timelymanner-nz Great interpretation... and cringe is the perfect word to describe, how most of us feel.
There was a lot of video footage that was tampered with or deleted that the prosecution should have known about. I have seen that the prosecution delayed handing over evidence for almost a year and a half. And that to this day there are other items the defense asked for that were never turned over.
And the prosecution is retrying the charges. And Paul O'Keefe has issued a civil claim against Karen Read Unbelievable.
Ich bin aus Deutschland. Der ganze Prozess wurde von mir angesehen. Unglaublich was diese Richterin veranstaltet
❤Judge Canone is recognized worldwide as corrupt!
@beatemuller1881 Welcome Deutschland, I have found memories of visiting Holland many times, your culture and people are so welcoming. 💕
@@eagle-eye29 yessssss ...
I watch a lot of court. This makes my head want to explode. AJ has sooo much patience. Great vid, thank you so much! If this were fiction it would be unbelievable...
@mammajamma4959 Thank you for you feedback. Ahh I know what you mean.
There was prosecutorial and judicial misconduct. If anyone has seen the new microdots upload, there was misconduct going on in pre trial. Even though Jackson more than proved Auntie bev has ties to people in the case, and should be legal right to recused herself, she went back to her chamber (to think it over) and had a melt down and came back out of breath and visually shaking. Her hands were shaking so bad, you could see the gasses she was holding vibrate. Then she said NO. There was evidence that was supposed to be being tested and lally kept stalling about giving defence a copy, and kept telling them in a few weeks. Jackson then showed communication from the lab that said, they had attempted to reach Lally several times and were ignored, so they closed the file on the testing. I have no idea what was being tested, but it was destroyed. The Defence really needs to get this case in a higher court regarding the many issues of misconduct. What they did in Karens trial, was 100 times worse that Baldwin.
@@SheCat1964 I agree.
Also, judicial misconduct. Cannoli needs to be de-robed.
Maybe it's time to step down if a judge can not be fair. 💕
FBI/DOJ needs to clean house of the corruption in Norfolk Co. DA, ADA, Court and Police, amongst others.
Something needs to be done.
This is a disgrace,this judge should be held responsible for all of this wrong doing,how would she feel if one of her loved ones was in this position and god forbid Karen does prison time for this
@@steveregal8592 Well said. ❤️
The fact that no photos were taken when the car was seized, I believe all evidence collected after that should be disallowed due to chain of custody issues. The whole case is disgusting.
@robertscown9218 And why bring the SUV back to Canton ( oh because they only recused themselves for questioning... yah, right?....it was so wrong it upset me as well
@@KarenColeUKLawyer completely agree, if only her surname was Baldwin
@robertscown9218 I did a couple of videos on the Judge's behaviour. ua-cam.com/video/l3XOjTVi7Ts/v-deo.htmlsi=hTgUUjlhQoriXF4E
The appearance of bias and corruption is real and judge Bev should never have been on the bench. Whether she knows Sean McCabe or not is irrelevant when the public perceives her action's as biased. She should have recused herself.
Exactly 💯 who cares, providing she can be a fair gatekeeper... in my opinion, she was really against the defense. Terrible.
Totally Agree, this judge needs to go whether she got pressured into something or not!! BOGUS!!
💯 it really amazes me how some people can not see it.
So much misconduct I can't even process. The way this judge rushes the defense is unlike anything I've ever witnessed in any trial I've ever watched. This judge is complicit. She's absolutely awful.
@@daniellealexander7392 💯
I forgot how much I disliked the judge just randomly sustaining or denying objections
It would be interesting to count 🤔
How did the jurors screw up so bad
She confused the hell out of them.
And they didn’t have a lot of evidence because Bev wouldn’t allow it
The judge disgusts me. She has no patience or tolerance for Defense, but allows Lally to ask barrage after barrage of irrelevant questions!
@EFL4952 💯 His strategy was terrible and the Judge allowing him to rabbit on was disgusting when she told the defense to move on... how many times?
There was all kinds of prosecutorial misconduct going all the way back to the very initial pre trial hearings. The judge just ignored it all and allowed the prosecutors to "correct their errors".
I agree. ❤️
Question: During the hearing to recuse Judge Bev, the defense came with some pretty solid evidence showing that Beverly has ties to the very witnesses that the defense implicates in their 3rd party culprit defense. All that is needed is the _appearance_ of bias, but regardless, Bev argued the veracity of the evidence presented against her when denying the recusal.
Is she allowed to do that? Judge Glanville (YSL trial in GA) got reprimanded by the GA Supreme Court for arguing against his bias, when they granted the defense request to recuse him. The GA Supreme Court said the judge was not allowed to argue whether the facts were true or not, but rather that when the 3 prongs for recusal were met, he was to stand down and hand it over to a new judge. Does this not apply in MA as well?
I hope the defense can get Bev booted off the retrial, if there is one. The public appearance of her bias is crystal clear.
@justkim9827 The Judge can decide not to recuse herself. They would have to appeal to a higher court.
This was so helpful. These MA state troopers are corrupt & the judge seems unbothered by their behavior. This case should have been thrown out.
@nancyusher8757 Thank you for your feedback it is greatly appreciated 😊 🙏 I agree with you. 💕
The Pretrial Hearings, and there were many, were infuriating. The DAs public statement is a misconduct gem in and of itself. If you want to watch them Atty Melanie Little has all of them in her playlist. It's a calm, smart channel.
You are right, every single hearing my jaw dropped to the floor!
Yes, I saw Melanie's interview with a police dog trainer very good...and her commitment for Karen Read Trial is commendable. She made her first an appearance on police off the cuff. I think they met in acting classes. I believe she is a full time UA-camr... and has got a great following.
I hope there was enough misconduct to rise to the level of Judge Cannone being held accountable in some way 🤞🏽🤞🏽🤞🏽🤞🏽🤞🏽
@@AussieInsider can you see you are now blue
Yes I hope so @AussieInsider
Right from the beginning, I say yes! How can anyone trust a word this state says!!!
@MatthewDePasse-sm9qf They have lost credibility in my opinion.
This is known as an "Oh Sh#t" moment!!!
Why can’t they stop this? It’s so bad! This shouldn’t be legal! Why is this happening? So frustrating!! 😢😮
yes, when the FBI/DOJ independently tell both parties that Read didn't hit him with her car, and JOK was NOT hit by a car, the district attorney needed to drop the charges immediately.
You would think...but I heard jury thought the FBI hiring the accident reconstruction experts... the jury thought they might have been Karen Read's insurance company...*all because judge would not allow the jury to know who hired them...(hope that makes sense).
@@KarenColeUKLawyer yes, I saw that too, which makes it just more of a travesty that Beach house Bev blocked the truth, I knew the jury couldn't figure out that the Feds had hired them!!!
Did you see the Sandra Birchmore arrest, 3 of the investigating officers are the same as in the Karen Read investigation. hmmmm
They all need to lose their protection and all go to prison!
the whole thing has been dodgy from day one... Aunty Bev seems to have an agenda ... to pin it on the girl.. got to wonder why she is hanging on so tight to the case... exactly what dirt does who have on her?
The prosecution’s entire case had major moments of prosecutorial misconduct…the inverted video being the most glaring…beyond that the prosecution’s case alone should have left every honest soul out there with reasonable doubt as to Karen Read’s guilt on all counts. In fact I would argue it should be unreasonable to not have reasonable doubt.
If the defense had rested then they should have easily gotten not guilty verdicts. And yet even after they presented their side which poked even more holes in the prosecution’s case-like gaping holes…they only got a mistrial.
What trial were the O’Keefe’s watching? And to the hung jury on the one count I can’t even see where they were coming from at all.
@@anonymousowl72 Well said and written. If i voted not guilty on 2 counts, I would want to sue the court for picking the foreman who clearly had not done his job in reporting my vote...and wasted 9-1/2 weeks of my life. lol... honestly the more I think about it I feel sick this is what justice looks like.
@@KarenColeUKLawyer thank you and agree, it’s sickening and what a waste of time…especially in light of Auntie Bev coddling them knowing potentially she could manipulate their decisions.
@@anonymousowl72
Great coverage and commentary. Just subscribed. This case stinks as well as MSP, Canton and all the involved actors in the cover up
@timquitzau1510 Ahh thanks. I value every subscriber, and my aim is that you find some value, take away, and you are inspired to comment. I heard a judge say the other day, our justice system, should be scrutinised and held to the highest standard. My aim is not to humiliate but to understand and see where it goes wrong. And commend those involved in the process, when it goes right.
Thank you so much for putting this all together! Fantastic coverage of the obvious prosecutorial misconduct!!❤
Thank you for your feedback your comment is so greatly appreciated 💕
Definitely interested in the Judge's conduct during the trial.
@@roseharvey2664 For your feedback 🙏
Here for the premier. Liked and shared out.
I could listen to you all day. Your voice is soothing and comforting. Also, your content is top notch.
Ah, thanks. I really appreciate your feedback. 💕
It was definitely in my opinion prosecutorial misconduct. They knew good and well that video had been flipped, and they tried to present it as if though they were standing by the passenger side of the vehicle. But did the judge do anything not at all. Why would she? She’s too busy trying to cover for them. They all need to be held accountable, the judge and the prosecution along with the police officers. Hopefully the FBI will finally do some real investigation and hold all those accountable and then maybe the truth can come out for what really happened to John. We know Karen did not hit him with the car, all the evidence proves that she did not do it
So much wrong with this 😫 case from beginning to end 😕
Excellent, also liked and shared! Thank you
@@kirstenL475 Why thank you. I appreciate your feedback.
What about the obvious Problem of no chain of custody? There were no photos of the taillight prior to LE tampering with it.
All concerning.
Protecting serving police officers, the body was found in snow outside and yet the troopers did not get a search warrant for the home, based on one person saying Karen admitted that she hit the victim information that the witness failed to divulge on the day and hours after the body was found, therefore the evidence was made to fit the story.
💯 I did a video on the idea there was no probable cause... what if the occupants of the house were injured...why didn't the dog bark? So many questions.
I think Lally engaged in a lot of dirty tricks cloaked in ineptitude. But his closing was like he copied Jen McCabe’s burn book.
The whole trial is very frustrating. Every time i rewatch testimonies i cannot understand why someone in power has not stepped in yet. My lord a blind man could see the corruption.im still amazed at the jury not just calling it NG on all counts .
I am with you ... great observation. I heard the jury thought the defense accident reconstruction experts were her car insurance. * remember the court would not allow in if was the FBI that hired them...and the defense, just asked we haven't hired you...or paid for you...
No chain of custody, law-enforcement tampered with the video and the tail light
They didn't seem to note chain of custody. Crazy.
On cross examination, they are allowed to lead witnesses. So when Lally objects when AJ says things like "you clearly...", and Bev says "ask it differently"--- based on what?? The only thing I can think of is leading. I still wish they had said what the objections were. Most of them had to be BS. And the way Bev handled them and inserted herself was inappropriate.
Also, 100% there was prosecutorial misconduct. In SO many ways.
You know that is a good idea for a video...Questioning a witnesses. In the UK, we do it differently to America. 💕
@@KarenColeUKLawyer that's interesting! I'd be interested!
When ever they say other hearing it is the FBI hearing.
I believe it is the grand jury hearing. The FBI provided reports for that hearing.
@@KarenColeUKLawyer the federal grand jury. They were aloud to mention the state grand jury.
@Raymail-tj4cf they kept saying the other hearing. And judge would not allow defense to say the accident reconstruction experts were hired by the FBI. (So jurors, from what ... I heard assumed they were from her car insurance because the defense did say something about them not hired by defense.) Unbelievable
There were actually two separate federal grand Juries. One Levy let them lie under oath at. The next he confronted them with their electronic records.
It's where the butt dial excuse came from. They couldn't admit to making those phone calls and texts after swearing they never did.
Because if they admitted it they'd be admitting to lying under oath previously. Higgins also gave a proffer at some point. Nobody knows exactly what he said but it's likely how the defense knew how he disposed of his phone.
Another really crazy thing that came out at trial from multiple witnesses. Lally coaching them before they testified in front of the federal grand juries.
I don’t know how Alan Jackson didn’t lose his shit.
I know what you mean.. but could it be he is a cool dude from California, laid back. 🤔 AJ is amazing 💕
@@KarenColeUKLawyer he really is. I can’t wait for this whole trial to be over with so we can hear what he and David Yannetti have to say. If it is maddening for us, I can’t imagine how it is for them.
@@subewa I will be with you at a front row seat... for that interview. 💕
When is someone gonna be held responsible for the judge and prosecution in this farce??
A different, ethical judge would have dismissed this case wo prejudice.
I agree. ❤️
I take WO to mean "without" prejudice. The state's cause revolved around the tail light and the video clips we saw provided by this presenter, showed the vehicle's tail light lens intact. Read had said she backed into O'Keefe's vehicle in the course of moving her vehicle to begin to look for O'Keefe. Hitting O'Keefe's car punched a hole in the red lens of the tail light of her vehicle. The TL lens was clearly not shattered into all the pieces the Trooper and Lally are claiming it was.
Then add all the other "inexplicable" things from the magic Sally Port video to the casual continuing to find pieces of lens for weeks after O'Keefes murder.
Other writers have made, to their credit, provided what amount to "laundry lists" of irregularities or assertions that seemingly negate themselves when subjected to any critical scrutiny.
This prosecution should have been dismissed "with prejudice".
I can understand why some people on the jury would want to believe the police, even in this case. Other podcaster's with legal experience, pointed out the the defense should have limited itself
We as citizens do rely on police, for some small things, as well as events that are a crisis. I have been a minor beneficiary of police action myself. A vehicle I was driving was hit by someone running a red light, long after the traffic light had gone green in my vehicle's direction of travel. The red light runner was obscured by tall, concrete elevated commuter train supports and a large truck, waiting in a right hand only, turn lane.
The red light runner had a van full of relatives and he stopped.
I called the local police, who at least at that time, in that city, took fender bender reports. (I thought for a couple of seconds, I was dead meat. I was a heartbeat or two short of successfully taking evasive action, but I avoided being T-Boned in my cars driver's door.) The van driver later claimed I ran the red light, not him. He had witnesses. I had a police report that he had signed.
Police officers can also make innocent mistakes. I testified as an expert witness in a car crash that involved some friends. My friend was ticketed for failing to properly control her vehicle, resulting in a car crash. The vehicle had a failure of a lower ball joint, which is a critical suspension component*. This failure caused the car to swerve into oncoming traffic. The police officer thought that my friend had negligently lossed control of her vehicle. After listening to her explanation and looking at the vehicle, it was obvious what had caused her loss of control. When the left lower front ball joint failed, it caused the steering linkage to pull the car into a sharp left turn and into oncoming traffic.
The kicker to this part's failure, it was a brand new part.
My friend was still responsible for the damage to the other vehicle, however, due to the facts of this incident, it was not correct to be ticketed for failing to properly operate her vehicle.
*for people who know what a ball joint is: The "ball" of the ball joint pulled out the socket of the ball joint. This was a used car that had just been purchased and had had front end work, before it was sold. There was no visible wear on the "ball".
This is the most UNJUSTIFIED CASE THAT IVE EVER SEEn ,READ, OR HEARD IN MY ENTIRE LIFE. This so called judge should certainly be disbarred from her position as sho😮uld whomever was involved with this case including the DA. How can they continue to hold their positions with all of the wrong was done from the very beginning of this case?
1. They never put crime tape to protect the property from being contaminated
2. All of the people within the property (inside and outside) of the crime scene were never questioned
3. Why they didn't use sanitary products to gather evidence
4. Why were the Canton police department even involved in any part of the investigation
5. Why Trooper Proctor was involved in any matter at all knowing that he had a close relationship with the parties involved
6. ALL OF The state POLICE involved help with cover up instead of doing g their job to investigate the murder of another police officer
7. Why would every officer protect the home owner who is another police officer?
@@florencepariseau1574 Proctor lied so much.
According to Proctor..it was Rafferty who passed over the inverted video...😮 Man they need to come in and clean house!! Tully and Bukaneke..such a joke, all of them
@lynettemacvicar1034 And who did Rafferty give it to...watch @Aussieinsider she did a great video on How sallyport video could have been altered.
@@KarenColeUKLawyer will do. Maybe I missed something..quite possible 🇨🇦
@@lynettemacvicar1034 ❤️ my native country Canada 🇨🇦 💕
@@KarenColeUKLawyer I've been to the UK..loved it !! I envy you.will watch Aussieinsider today
@lynettemacvicar1034 Oh wow I could have met you for coffee...England is beautiful. However when I came here I couldn't believe how the roads are smaller... I did a video on driving in a foreign country ( and I show some on lanes near me). Also did a video taking you on a drive through lanes, going to a iconic Abbey. ua-cam.com/video/vFGNYR1433Q/v-deo.htmlsi=uixAJHnF4E3TD2P3 that might bring back some memories of England for you. 💕
Listening to these liars wriggle around the truth the first time around was painful enough for me.
@ladymuck2151 I found the prosecutor's questions time-consuming, and he jumped around so much. He made no sense.
Disgusting how the judge helped the prosecutor by sustaining most of his BS objections that had No justified reason. Extremely Biased judge who helped the prosecutor!
Far more judicial misconduct honestly. Prosecutorial misconduct can be dealt with if there's a good defense team and a competent judge. This judge was rabidly pro prosecution to the point it's blatantly obvious she was covering for them
Oh yeh... the judge would NOT have found the prosecutor did anything wrong...sad.
Biased Bev says it all!
I agree totally!
Also, when the vehicle is pulled into the Sally port, for supposedly the first time, the floor of the area it is pulling into is completely clear of snow in exactly the same size and shape of her vehicle. In other words, it was probably already in the Sally port prior to this, then it was made to look like it was pulled in for the first time here, but it was not. What may have happened during that period? Thank you for time and effort to exposing the prosecutorial misconduct in the case amidst so much other misconduct.
The ring camera from her leaving the house shows the tail light was intact and the pieces the accumulated in 5 days didn’t match her tail light! You don’t have to be an investigator to figure this one out
This should have never went to trial
The judge sucks. She must have been paid off.
@tracy3066 Look for clues, does she have a gold gavel or silk robe ? lol but seriously ( sadly my opinion is she favours the Commonwealth). 💕
Where is the Defense MISCONDUCT charge? The Defense made a CLAIM at the beginning of the trial that some other individual committed the crime, but provided NO evidence that ANYONE other than Karen Read committed the crime. The Federal prosecutor also needs to explain TO THE PUBLIC how the federal investigation was started and why after a lot of money was spent (Some say over a million dollars) there are no federal charges. How do we know the federal investigation is over? The federal government NEVER would have turned over the 3,000 page report which lays out the investigation if the grand jury was still in session. The grand jury has to issue indictments before ending. There have been no arrests by the feds, so there were no indictments.
Why couldn't the federal investigation be mentioned in court? It would have been TOO PREJUDICIAL AGAINST Karen Read. The Feds investigated many people that were not Karen Read for the crime and found NO evidence that someone else did it. The Defense was VERY CLEVER in their lies and relying on the ignorance of the general public who get their knowledge of the law from watching TV to create a conspiracy where none existed.
@nelsona8285 The Feds just arrested Officer Matthew Farewell, for the M of Sandra Birchmore. Do not sure what you mean the grand jury is not in session. 💕
@@KarenColeUKLawyer There is not just ONE federal grand jury in a federal district at any given time. There can be MULTIPLE grand juries for different investigations. The Sandra Birchmore grand jury is definitely NOT the same grand jury that heard evidence in the Karen Read case. The US Attorney's Office would NEVER release that 3,000 page report to the judge, prosecutor and defense in the Karen Read case if it was still in session. Grand Juries are SECRET proceedings and that 3,000 page report gave up the whole investigation. It also showed that many people were questioned and no one else was charged in the federal investigation.
That is why the federal investigation could not be mentioned in Read's trial. It would be too prejudicial against Read.
She did it. At least 8 jurors didn't believe the "corrupt cops did it as well as framed me for doing it" story that she told after about 5 other stories she told at different times before the trial started.
@nelsona8285 Thanks for that. However, whilst I understand the FBI report could be considered prejudicial for the Prosecution. The jurors thought the accident reconstruction experts were hired by her car insurance company. So, in a retrail they should say they are not hired or represent her car insurance. I am sure Karen Read was confused pretrial, with all the negative accusations. Do you really think given the terrible investigation and Sallyport video, missing time etc it is not possible the taillight pieces were planted? So do you also not believe Sargent Borrows, taillight was cracked but not completely missing?💕
@@KarenColeUKLawyer I think many guilty people have won in court by having high priced, sleazy attorneys. I think there is a special place in hell for sleazy attorneys that KNOW THAT THEIR CLIENT IS GUILTY and try to blame others for the crime their client committed. This was a simple DUI hit and run case. John O'Keefe's cell phone data reported NO new GPS positions shortly after Read left him, it was found UNDER his body and continued recording GPS positions when the police took his phone.
You think she was "confused" when she gave the TV interview where she said she may have hit him and in his drunkenness he passed out? That is still causing his demise. How about her phone call to Kerry Roberts at 5am, before he was found, saying he was dead and possibly a plow hit him? What was the call at 1 am to her parents about? Why didn't the Defense put her father and brother on the stand to refute the "The taillight was not as damaged as the sallyport photo shows" defense? They both saw her SUV that morning. Her brother was on video cleaning snow off her SUV.
If you listen to the actual testimony of the sergeant it was cracked and packed with snow. The dashcam photo (Exhibit 103) at 8 am in O'Keefe's driveway (before her SUV was found and seized by state police) clearly shows A LOT more missing red lens compared to the driver side tail light. Not cracked as the defense claimed happened when she backed into John's vehicle which even the ARCAA guys said would not have cracked the tail light.
@@KarenColeUKLawyer Exhibit 103 which is a photo from dashcam video taken at 8am in the driveway of John O'Keefe's home shows Read's SUV and the passenger tail light clearly has A LOT less red lens than the driver's tail light. This was BEFORE the state troopers seized her SUV at her parents home. If you watch the court testimony of the sergeant he said the lens was cracked and packed with snow.
So, now please tell me how John's cellphone data that showed the phone NEVER going in the house and stopping updates shortly after Read left until it was found under John's body in the morning was wrong or somehow altered by State police detectives?
Prosecution, judge and canton PD are a disgrace on this case! #FreeKarenRead
New subscriber! 👍👍 Thanks for cover this so good!
@Voyagersk9 welcome new subscriber 💕 and I wish I had answers to your questions. If we bring awareness, change will happen.
Jackson should have asked Buchenik since when do vehicles have steering wheels on the passenger side.
Defense had all reasons to file a motion to dismiss based on this deceptive video. Did they?
I doubt the Judge would have found The Prosecutor did it in bad faith...
Great insight into this mess of a trial.thank you for shining a light or the misscarrage of justice.karen read is factually innocent.shame on the state for even trying this farce un open court.I look forward to your next post!
@briancorbier3549 thanks for the feedback. Have you watched our other videos on this case?
@@KarenColeUKLawyer i have been watching your content and am very impressed by theway you deliver the way the cases covered with thought and quite sound reasoning.the nuances of trial law are fascinating to me.once again,thanks for shedding some light on these matters.look forward to seeing your next post.
Appreciate your reply. I will be watching the Donna Adelson Trial coming up next week. I have a playlist on that case, very interesting. Watch "Conspiracy To Commit Murder of Dan Markel | Florida State Prosecutions" on UA-cam ua-cam.com/play/PLM8XvRAYm0JW26aCjADtGKpW1A_6UGknB.html&si=hkblPLoTqF8zM8eD
This should have been thrown out in so many points! This is obvious!! Where is the rule of law? How lay Sh….it!!!
💯 % agree with you. 💕
Does a bear poo in the forest? Was there misconduct? They tried to frame the lady!
On that we can agree. 💯
Pretty sure if u hafta ask... solo cups leaf blower missing phones until the murderers are caught we fight for kr❤
The toppers are not tell the truth. It’s so bad!! They need to be behind bars!! 😮
I don’t understand why Allie saying ‘Colin wasn’t there when JOHN WAS IN THE HOUSE!!!!’ Didn’t get any traction…. Yet!????
Hopefully, they will see these videos and point out all this. It is serious, no messing about, there is so much doubt.
Proctors uneven and seemingly “manual” (as in…not automatic) breathing pattern seriously gives me anxiety.
It’s like, he suddenly realizes his brain needs oxygen and he takes a big huge rip of fresh air, just in time.
I’m assuming he’s just under an immense amount of stress and dpressure, so his body isn’t working exactly right, but man…if that’s just how he breathes regularly, 😬 is he ok?
He knew, his investigation was going to scrutinised... shame.
That Sgt. is an absolute SNAKE!
@globyois Scary isn't it...
Great video
Thank you. 💕
I don’t understand why defense didn’t bring up that the roads where icy and the 23 mph was her tires spinning and when it jerked is when she hit a dry spot on the road
From what I remember...the defense proved with the SUV ignition start cycles (that LE used the wrong key cycles ..)..and that the reverse actually happened after they collected Karen Reads Car.
They cover each other's backs Bev Lally Proctor ex
I think Lally covered a few backs what Lally did here is very naughty. Did you see the video I did on Can you spot a lie? ua-cam.com/video/dnoYBWq1RDo/v-deo.htmlsi=jqPI68MPND7XIRMz
In pretrial hearings, Lally said that the time on the video that showed when the defendant's car was towed from the home was wrong because of daylight savings time. So they knew before trial started. How can they claim it was a "typo" here?
I can not figure out why they would lie, unless to cover up something, or to ensure a conviction against Karen Read. Shameful either way. 😕
Yes there was misconduct in the worst way, when you have to resort to quoting sophrates, it’s bad
😆 🤣 💕
23:48 I have ptsd from watching this trial the first time. It’s painful to watch the judge 🤯 the witness 🤯 the frustration 😭
@mrsloveleebest Oh yes Snap ...it was and is... painful to watch... like when she in front of the jury rushes the defense to move along...when the prosecutor should object if they think questions are repetitive...( I hope that makes sense)...
@@KarenColeUKLawyer ‘ I’ll allow that’ or ‘ I’ll give you that one Mr Lally 🤯🤯🤯 we have the reasonable man standard to uphold as jurors & it seems Judge Canone is unable to attain or maintain the reasonable man standard herself. She’s supposed to be the gate keeper, the overseer of justice and she is shameless in her application of the law imo.
@mrsloveleebest I have not seen a Judge behave like that. And no basis for an objection...frustrating.
@ it’s truely shocking. But at least we get to witness it. All courts should have cameras for public availability so kudos to the US for allowing it.
@mrsloveleebest I agree...I just read the judges decision on a very famous case in uk in response to an appeal ( and it is contempt of court to share or mention it without expessed permission from the court. We are so lucky to be able to discuss and see trials in USA.
Liked & shared
Thanks @Lexy❤
Every single element of prosecutorial misconduct in present imo. It’s tragic that this can happen in (I wanna say 2024 lol) 2025. Makes me sick tbh. Excellent video Karen ❤
@LeanneRigby-iy7nx unbelievable Thanks it is such a miscarriage of justice...
Has microdots put the video of the Sally port Lally presented to the other troopers in the frame while proctor is talking about what video HE viewed in the interior for pre-trial prep? the colors he quoted for the date and timestamps were COMPLETELY different. He described yellow, they inverted video was blue.
15:15 never mind, you got to it. That was SUCH a major sticking point for me. It was glaringly obvious when I first heard his testimony. I was PISSED. The video wasn’t just inverted, it was EDITED. I don’t know who did it, whether it was the Ada office, or the police, but either way it falsified evidence. It should have been an instant mistrial.
All good questions who altered the video? 💕