Your explanation skill is too good sir and after seeing this video my concept is clear regarding admissions Thank you so much !! And do upload more video of other subjects
Whether the information given by the accused that he purchased the murder weapon from shop of G followed by his leading the police, to his shop is admissible under sec 27 evidence act ? Can this be a discovery though not recovery u/s 27 ? Herein the actual weapon used in the crime is not recovered yet
Sir you are brilliant. Pls upload videos description of parties, Effect of death of parties,,legal representatives, Principles governing settlement of issues ( Issues Laws and facts)
deepika sharma The clause (3) of Section 21 lays down that an admission may be proved by or on behalf of a person making it if it is relevant otherwise than as an admission. The condition is that the statement must be relevant to determine the fact in issue and only previous statements are relevant. For example, where plaintiffs sought to establish their part by proving that A and B were brothers, a statement to that effect made by one of the plaintiffs long before the controversy arose, were held relevant. The statement admissible under clause (3) is also relevant under sections 6 to 13 and 34 and 35 of the Evidence Act
Admission is a statement oral or documentary which suggests any inference as to fact in issue or relevant fact.
Your explanation skill is too good sir and after seeing this video my concept is clear regarding admissions
Thank you so much !!
And do upload more video of other subjects
Bahot pyara...
D example is from book of Batuk Lal ,law of evidence ,section 19 . .
Sir thank you so much for the videos , these are so helpful . Simple and precise to understand . ,LL ask for the topics if needed .
Whether the information given by the accused that he purchased the murder weapon from shop of G followed by his leading the police, to his shop is admissible under sec 27 evidence act ?
Can this be a discovery though not recovery u/s 27 ?
Herein the actual weapon used in the crime is not recovered yet
It will not be admissible under section 27 untill the weapon is recovered! Also, it can't be a discovery untill the weapon is discovered.
Very well explained sir... Thank you
Sir I like your speech
Thanks sir aap bhut acha pdhate ho thanks sir lv u
sir please make a complete 2-3 hour or more, lecture on IEA.
Admission made by party are evidence against
Privies in blood, law, estate?
Tell me sir
Very nice and excellent
I have read in book in Sec 18 that statements made by persons having pecuniary interest is admission so pls clarify if possible
its super..u cleARED MY QUERY..THANKS A LOT!!!
thanks u sir ....pls upload more video on evidence Act
Very well explained!
How is a pleader? The advocate of the party?
Thanks
Sir please make videos with charts
thanks
thank u so much.sir ,I want to join ur online classes..plz tell me details...
Sir aap koi or subjct ka lecture kyu ni dete??
surbhi kumari soon will upload videos on cpc
Thanks for your beautiful lecture
thanks sir.. nice lecture
sir apke concept and cases clear nhi hai.... u need to improve your topics
sir plz dying decleration par you said you will an other video plz provide it if possible
aryan Tewari yes I've made !! see in my channel section!
Very nice
sir plzzzzz give lecture on section 14 of Indian evidence act.
Good teaching sirrr
addmission kya hai isi ko aur clear karke samjaye
Sir please upload more video on IEA
Sir pls provide the video for sec 40 to 44
u r great sir....
Sir you are brilliant. Pls upload videos description of parties, Effect of death of parties,,legal representatives, Principles governing settlement of issues ( Issues Laws and facts)
No
bhaiya plz presumptions pe video bna do
aaj hi upload kr do
plz bhaiya
plz upload more vedios of evidence act sir
plz sir upload more video on evidence act
Samikhya Mishra sure
Sir can u explain Clause 3 of section 21 again..
deepika sharma The clause (3) of Section 21 lays down that an admission may be proved by or on behalf of a person making it if it is relevant otherwise than as an admission. The condition is that the statement must be relevant to determine the fact in issue and only previous statements are relevant.
For example, where plaintiffs sought to establish their part by proving that A and B were brothers, a statement to that effect made by one of the plaintiffs long before the controversy arose, were held relevant. The statement admissible under clause (3) is also relevant under sections 6 to 13 and 34 and 35 of the Evidence Act
Akshay Bhasin Thank you for this sir😇 u r a great teacher
deepika sharma your welcome
Upload more vidio,nice sir
You're great sir
Sir when u explain everything don't mixit firstly be separate each section with examples rest of it your lecture is nice
plz upload more vedios of IEA sir.. you explain very well .
India 1st ys sure i will!!
thnx a lot sir 😊
sir plz add more lectures on evidence act.
Thanks sir
Sir kuch notes provide kar sakete hai plz
sir I want whole act lecture plz tell me how to get that
U shld see book..carefully..dt wll b hlpful.._coz its not possible to provide a full video.
dir burden of proof samjaye na
Nice sir
Sir ji black board par write kar k sikhaw
Admission may be self harming and self serving. But confession must be self harming.
Ap galt bta rhay ke admission self haming hona chaye...
M Shoaib admission is always self harming but uske bhi exceptions hai jab vo self preserving ho sakta hai jaise ki section 32(1) and others
sir ap presa kr rhe ho. aise to sb bhul jayege, kuch smjh nhi aa rha
Admissions self harming hona nai chahiye ......Pr admissions k vajah c self harm hota h
adya singh I didn't get your query! Admissions should be self harming not self preserving
Akshay Bhasin it is not a compulsion that admissions should be self harming
No it's not necessary! exception is section 32 where it can be self preservation!
It's vague sir I m sorry to say so
Sir apna phone number de dijiye
evidence sec. 103 & 106 ko detail m btaye plz🙏🙏🙏🙏
Mottey galat matt padha
Mind your language Mr. mohit.
Thanks
Nice sir