The Real Purpose of Bloom's Taxonomy for Instructional Design is Not Learning Objectives?

Поділитися
Вставка

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1

  • @alexdavidsalas
    @alexdavidsalas  22 дні тому

    00:00:01 🎥 The speaker shares updates about upcoming videos on drones and mentions past interviews.
    00:01:08 📚 Bloom's taxonomy was originally created to standardize exam item validation, not to develop learning objectives.
    00:03:15 🎓 Dr. Lorin Anderson, a key figure in the revision of Bloom's taxonomy, joins the discussion.
    00:05:51 ⏳ Bloom's taxonomy was developed to manage the influx of students due to the GI Bill following WWII and to optimize examination processes.
    00:12:45 🔄 Issues in historical grading methods led to the establishment of the A-F grading system, which was more reliable than numerical grades.
    00:15:40 ⚖ The taxonomy serves as an analytical tool to assess learning objectives rather than to create them, ensuring a balanced cognitive approach.
    00:21:50 🔼 The original pyramid structure of Bloom's taxonomy is criticized for oversimplifying cognitive skills; a rectangular model is proposed for better understanding.
    00:25:03 ♻ Learning is fluid; one can create and analyze simultaneously, highlighting the non-linear nature of skill development.
    00:27:33 📝 The concept of synthesis in education has evolved; it now focuses on creating and original thinking rather than just paraphrasing literature.
    28:12 🔧 Synthesis involves reassembling components in a better way, not just putting them back together as they were.
    29:50 🏫 Many colleges still reference the outdated 1956 version of Bloom's Taxonomy and misapply it by aligning verbs inappropriately to learning objectives.
    30:43 🎯 Effective objective-setting starts with identifying the most important content for students, rather than merely selecting verbs from a list.
    31:10 🤝 Collaboration among teachers helps pinpoint key learning objectives by discussing and prioritizing what is most critical for student understanding.